7/29/2019 IN CONCLUSION by Ivo Lapenna

1/1

IN CONCLUSION: . : f ,. : l.' .. J . ~ : ) l/',i

, , . By Dr. :Ivo; Lapenna 1 ; . " ~ :' - ::. . \ '; ;:- :. . .,. . I t. a l l .be.gan wi th my a r t!i c l:e '. published in the J u ly / ,- .' . August 1ssue , 1962, of the monthly '"Esperanto". I am thereforeglad '.that . I have now the opportunii t y to s t ress in conclusionthe fol lowing poin ts :

1. The d i s c u s ~ i o n has shown t ha t there i s s t i l l , evenamong some profess iqnal ph i lo log i s t s , a considerable lack ofknowledge about e : j , ~ E i n t a r y fac ts in r e s p ~ c ~ ~ o Esperanto . I tcan be hoped t ha t 4h:e loya l and frank c r i ic ism of such d i s -.to r t ions wi l l help in avo_ding s imi lar gross mistakes in the