in the united states bankruptcy court for the …cases.gcginc.com/kwk/pdflib/122_10585.pdfand...
TRANSCRIPT
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) Quicksilver Resources Inc., et al.,1 ) Case No. 15-10585 (LSS) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) ) Hearing Date: April 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. (EDT)
) Obj. Deadline: April 8, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. (EDT)
DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND COMPENSATION OF
PROFESSIONALS UTILIZED IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE
The debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases
(collectively, the “Debtors”) respectfully submit this Debtors’ Motion for an Order Authorizing
the Employment and Compensation of Professionals Utilized in the Ordinary Course of Business
Nunc Pro Tunc to the Petition Date (the “Motion”). In support of the Motion, the Debtors
represent and set forth as follows: 2
JURISDICTION
1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and
1334. This matter is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2).
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax
identification number, are: Quicksilver Resources Inc. [6163]; Barnett Shale Operating LLC [0257]; Cowtown Drilling, Inc. [8899]; Cowtown Gas Processing L.P. [1404]; Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc. [9774]; Cowtown Pipeline L.P. [9769]; Cowtown Pipeline Management, Inc. [9771]; Makarios Resources International Holdings LLC [1765]; Makarios Resources International Inc. [7612]; QPP Holdings LLC [0057]; QPP Parent LLC [8748]; Quicksilver Production Partners GP LLC [2701]; Quicksilver Production Partners LP [9129]; and Silver Stream Pipeline Company LLC [9384]. The Debtors’ address is 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
2 A detailed description of the Debtors and their businesses and the Debtors’ restructuring, are set forth in greater detail in the Declaration of Vanessa Gomez LaGatta in Support of First Day Pleadings (the “First Day Declaration”), filed contemporaneously with the Debtors’ voluntary petitions for relief filed under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”).
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 11
2
2. Venue in this Court is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.
3. The statutory predicates for the relief requested herein are Bankruptcy Code
sections 105(a), 327, 328, and 330; rule 2014 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the
“Bankruptcy Rules”); and rule 2014-1 of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure
of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Local Rules”).3
BACKGROUND
A. General Background
4. On March 17, 2015 (the “Petition Date”), each of the Debtors filed a voluntary
petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in this Court. The Debtors continue
to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to
Bankruptcy Code sections 1107(a) and 1108. These chapter 11 cases have been consolidated for
procedural purposes only and are being jointly administered pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015
and Local Rule 1015-1. No request for the appointment of a trustee or examiner has been made
in these chapter 11 cases. No committees have been appointed or designated.
5. This Motion incorporates by reference the facts set forth in the First Day
Declaration as if fully set forth herein. Additional facts specific to this Motion are set forth
below.
B. Specific Background
6. The Debtors, in the day-to-day performance of their duties, regularly call upon
certain professionals, including attorneys and accountants (collectively, the “OCPs”), to assist
them in carrying out their responsibilities. The OCPs provide services to the Debtors in a variety
3 Under Local Rule 9013-1(f), the Debtors hereby confirm their consent to the entry of a final order by this
Court in connection with this Motion if it is later determined that this Court, absent consent of the parties, cannot enter final orders or judgments in connection therewith consistent with Article III of the United States Constitution.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 2 of 11
3
of matters unrelated to these chapter 11 cases, including accounting services, tax services, and
legal services with regard to specialized areas of the law. The OCPs utilized or expected to be
utilized by the Debtors during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases are identified on Exhibit B
to this Motion.
7. The Debtors submit that the continued employment and compensation of the
OCPs is in the best interests of their estates, creditors, and other parties in interest. The Debtors
commenced these chapter 11 cases to maintain and preserve the value of their business while
investigating and evaluating all potential means of maximizing the value of their assets and to
minimize any disruption that could negatively impact the Debtors’ business operations as they
transition into these chapter 11 cases. It is essential that the Debtors call upon certain
professionals that have institutional knowledge of the issues, facts, and circumstances related to
the Debtors’ business and that could impact the Debtors’ restructuring efforts to realize the most
value from the Debtors’ estates.
8. The efficient administration of these chapter 11 cases and the Debtors’ efforts to
transition into chapter 11 with minimal disruption would be hindered if the Debtors were
required to submit to the Court an application, affidavit, and proposed retention order for each
OCP; if each OCP was required to apply for approval of its employment and compensation; and
if each OCP was required to submit monthly applications for compensation and expense
reimbursement. The costs of preparing separate applications for each professional would
substantially outweigh any benefit to the bankruptcy estates. Further, a number of the OCPs may
be unfamiliar with the fee application procedures employed in bankruptcy cases. Given the
relatively small monthly fees expected to be incurred for each OCP, some of the OCPs may be
unwilling to render services to the Debtors if these requirements were imposed. The
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 3 of 11
4
uninterrupted services of the OCPs are vital to the Debtors’ continuing operations and their
ultimate ability to maximize value for the benefit of creditors.
9. Moreover, a requirement that the OCPs each file retention pleadings and follow
the usual fee application process required of other bankruptcy professionals would burden the
Clerk’s office, the Court, and the Office of the United States Trustee (the “U.S. Trustee”) with
unnecessary fee applications. This Motion proposes procedures to alleviate such a burden.
10. The list of OCPs listed on Exhibit B includes four accounting firms. In addition
to the OCPs, the Debtors have filed the Debtors’ Application for an Order Authorizing the
Employment and Retention of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Auditor for the Debtors Nunc
Pro Tunc to the Petition Date contemporaneously herewith. Importantly, the accounting firms
listed on Exhibit B will not perform bankruptcy-related services. Rather, these firms will
continue to provide the same ordinary course services that they provided to the Debtors pre-
petition, which services include, among other things, preparation of state and federal tax returns,
property tax valuation and related services, and assistance with technical accounting matters in
connection with the Debtors’ preparation of consolidated financial statements.
C. Proposed Procedures
11. The Debtors anticipate employing, among others, the OCPs listed on Exhibit B to
perform ongoing services during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases. During the pendency
of these chapter 11 cases, no single OCP will be paid more than $60,000 per month, on average,
over the preceding three-month period, excluding costs and disbursements (the “OCP Cap”), for
post-petition compensation for services rendered to the Debtors absent the consent of the U.S.
Trustee; provided, however, that the Debtors reserve the right to seek authority to increase the
OCP Cap if necessary under the circumstances upon notice and opportunity to object. The
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 4 of 11
5
Debtors also reserve the right to supplement or otherwise amend Exhibit B to add additional
professionals as they deem necessary and appropriate.
12. The Debtors propose that the following procedures shall govern the retention and
payment of OCPs (the “OCP Procedures”):
(i) To ensure that none of the OCPs represent or hold any interest adverse to the Debtors or their estates with respect to the matter on which such professional is employed, each OCP shall be required to file a declaration (each, a “Declaration of Disinterestedness”) with the Court, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, stating that it does not hold an interest materially adverse to the Debtors, and to serve its Declaration of Disinterestedness on the following parties: (a) Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100, Dallas, TX 75201, Attn: Charles R. Gibbs, Esq. and Sarah Link Schultz, Esq., counsel to the Debtors; (b) Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., One Rodney Square, 920 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: Paul N. Heath, Esq., Delaware counsel to the Debtors; (c) counsel to any official committee appointed in these cases; (d) Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, 425 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017, Attn: Steven M. Fuhrman, Esq., counsel to the First Lien Agent; (e) Latham & Watkins LLP, 885 Third Avenue, Suite 1000, New York, NY 10022, Attn: Mitchell A. Seider, Esq., counsel to the Second Lien Agent; (f) Emmet, Marvin & Martin LLP, 120 Broadway, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10271, Attn: Edward P. Zujkowski, Esq., as counsel to the Second Lien Indenture Trustee; (g) Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, 28 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10005, Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. and Samuel A. Khalil, Esq., counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders; and (h) the Office of the United States Trustee for Region 3, 844 King Street, Suite 2207, Lockbox 35, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: Jane Leamy, Esq.; and (i) those parties requesting notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002 (collectively, the “Notice Parties”).
(ii) The Notice Parties shall have seven days after the filing and service of a Declaration of Disinterestedness to object to the retention of the OCP filing such declaration (the “Objection Deadline”). Any objecting party shall serve its objection upon the Notice Parties and the relevant OCP on or before the Objection Deadline. If an objection cannot be consensually resolved within seven days after the Objection Deadline, then the retention of the OCP that is the subject of the objection shall be scheduled for hearing by the Debtors at the next regularly scheduled omnibus hearing date that is no less than fourteen days from that date or on a date otherwise agreed by the parties. The Debtors shall not be authorized to retain and pay such OCP until all outstanding objections have been withdrawn, resolved, or overruled by order of the Court.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 5 of 11
6
(iii) If no objection is received by the Objection Deadline with respect to an OCP, the Debtors shall be authorized to retain and pay that OCP in accordance with these OCP Procedures.
(iv) The Debtors are authorized to pay any retained OCP, without further application to the Court, 100% of fees and disbursements upon submission of an appropriate invoice setting forth in reasonable detail the nature of the services rendered after the Petition Date and the fees and disbursements related thereto; provided, however, that each OCP’s fees, excluding costs and disbursements, do not exceed the OCP Cap.
(v) To the extent that an OCP seeks compensation in excess of the OCP Cap (the “Excess Fees”), the OCP shall file with the Court and serve on the Notice Parties, which service may be via email, a notice of fees in excess of the OCP Cap (the “Notice of Excess Fees”) and an invoice setting forth, in reasonable detail, the nature of the services rendered and disbursements actually incurred, Notice Parties shall then have fourteen days to object to the Notice of Excess Fees. If after fourteen days no objection is filed, the Excess Fees shall be deemed approved, and the OCP may be paid 100% of fees and 100% of its expenses without the need to file a fee application.
(vi) The Appendix B Fee Guidelines adopted by the EOUST shall not be applicable to the retention or compensation of any OCP employed or compensated by this Order; provided, however, that any OCP who exceeds the OCP Cap may be required to comply with the Appendix B Fee Guidelines thereafter to the extent reasonably requested by the U.S. Trustee.
(vii) At three-month intervals during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases beginning with the period of March 17, 2015 through June 30, 2015, and for each three-month period thereafter (each, a “Quarter”), the Debtors shall file with the Court and serve on the Notice Parties, no later than 30 days after the end of such Quarter, a statement that shall include the following information for each OCP: (a) the name of the OCP; (b) the aggregate amounts paid as compensation for services rendered and reimbursement of expenses incurred by that OCP during the reported Quarter; (c) all post-petition payments made to that OCP to date; and (d) a general description of the type of services rendered by that OCP.
(viii) The Debtors may retain additional OCPs from time to time during these chapter 11 cases by (a) including each additional OCP on a supplement to Exhibit B that shall be filed with the Court and served on the Notice Parties and (b) having such additional OCP comply with the OCP Procedures.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 6 of 11
7
13. Although certain of the OCPs may hold minor amounts of unsecured claims
against the Debtors in respect of pre-petition services rendered, the Debtors do not believe that
any of the OCPs have an interest materially adverse to the Debtors, their creditors, or other
parties in interest. Thus, no OCP would be retained who does not meet, if applicable, the special
counsel retention requirement of Bankruptcy Code section 327(e). Importantly, the Debtors are
not requesting authority to pay any pre-petition amounts owed to OCPs.
RELIEF REQUESTED
14. The Debtors submit this Motion (a) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 105(a)
and 327 and Bankruptcy Rule 2014, authorizing, but not directing, the Debtors to retain the
OCPs without requiring the submission of separate retention pleadings for each OCP;
(b) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 105(a), 328, and 330, authorizing, but not directing,
the Debtors to pay the OCPs 100% of their post-petition fees and expenses, subject to the
limitations set forth in this Motion; and (c) requesting entry of an order substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Proposed Order”).
SUPPORTING AUTHORITY
15. In determining whether an entity is a “professional” within the meaning of
Bankruptcy Code section 327 and therefore whether it must be retained by express approval of
the Court, courts generally consider whether such entity is involved in the actual reorganization
effort, rather than a debtor’s ongoing business operations. See, e.g., Comm. of Asbestos-Related
Litigants v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In re Johns-Manville Corp.), 60 B.R. 612, 619 (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. 1986) (“[T]he phrase ‘professional persons,’ as used in § 327(a), is a term of art
reserved for those persons who play an intimate role in the reorganization of a debtor’s estate.”);
In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Grp. Inc., 112 B.R. 584, 587 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1990) (same).
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 7 of 11
8
Courts often consider the following factors in determining whether an entity is a “professional”
within the meaning of Bankruptcy Code section 327:
(i) whether the entity controls, manages, administers, invests, purchases, or sells assets that are significant to the debtor’s reorganization;
(ii) whether the entity is involved in negotiating the terms of a plan of reorganization;
(iii) whether the entity is directly related to the type of work carried out by the debtor or to the routine maintenance of the debtor’s business operations;
(iv) whether the entity is given discretion or autonomy to exercise his or her own professional judgment in some part of the administration of the debtor’s estate;
(v) the extent of the entity’s involvement in the administration of the debtor’s estate; and
(vi) whether the entity’s services involve some degree of special knowledge or skill, such that it can be considered a “professional” within the ordinary meaning of the term.
See, e.g., In re First Merchs. Acceptance Corp., No. 97-1500, 1997 WL 873551, at *3 (D. Del.
Dec. 15, 1997) (listing factors); In re Sieling Assocs. Ltd. P’ship, 128 B.R. 721, 723 (Bankr. E.D.
Va. 1991) (authorizing the debtor to retain an environmental consultant in the ordinary course of
business); In re Riker Indus., Inc., 122 B.R. 964, 973 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1990) (not requiring
Bankruptcy Code section 327 approval of the fees of a management and consulting firm that
performed only “routine administrative functions” and whose “services were not central to [the]
bankruptcy case”); In re Fretheim, 102 B.R. 298, 299 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1989) (holding that only
those professionals involved in the actual reorganization effort, rather than debtor’s ongoing
business, require approval under Bankruptcy Code section 327).
16. The foregoing factors must be considered as a whole when determining whether
an entity is a professional within the meaning of Bankruptcy Code section 327. None of the
factors alone are dispositive. Considering all of the factors, the Debtors do not believe that the
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 8 of 11
9
OCPs are professionals requiring a full retention under Bankruptcy Code section 327. The OCPs
will not be involved in the administration of these chapter 11 cases. Instead, the OCPs will
provide services in connection with the Debtors’ ongoing business operations, which services are
ordinarily provided by non-bankruptcy professionals. Nevertheless, to provide clarity and an
opportunity for oversight, the Debtors seek the relief requested herein to establish clear
mechanisms for retention and payment of the OCPs and thereby avoid any subsequent
controversy with respect thereto.
17. The importance of a debtor’s OCPs to its ongoing business operations and
restructuring efforts has been recognized by courts in this District in granting relief similar to the
relief requested in this Motion. See, e.g., In re Endeavour Operating Corp., No. 14-12308 (KJC)
(Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 6, 2014) (D.I. 155); In re Phoenix Payment Systems, Inc., No. 14-11848
(MFW) (Bankr. D. Del. Aug. 28, 2014) (D.I. 114); In re Energy Future Holdings Corp., No. 14-
10979 (CSS) (Bankr. D. Del. Jun. 3, 2014) (D.I. 765); In re Green Field Energy Servs., Inc., No.
13-12783 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 26, 2013) (D.I. 186); In re PMGI Holdings, Inc., No. 13-
12404 (CSS) (Bankr. D. Del. Oct. 11, 2013) (D.I. 130); In re Exide Technologies, No. 13011482
(KJC) (Bankr. D. Del. Jul. 11, 2013) (D.I. 332).4 The Debtors submit that similar authorization
is appropriate in these chapter 11 cases.
WAIVER OF BANKRUPTCY RULE 6004(a) AND 6004(h)
18. Given the nature of the relief requested herein, the Debtors respectfully request a
waiver of the notice requirements under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a) and the fourteen-day stay
under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), to the extent that either rule is applicable.
4 Because of the voluminous nature of the orders cited herein, such orders are not attached to this Motion.
Copies of these orders are available upon request of the Debtors’ proposed counsel.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 9 of 11
10
DEBTORS’ RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
19. Nothing contained herein is intended or should be construed as an admission as to
the validity of any claim against the Debtors, a waiver of the Debtors’ rights to dispute any
claim, or an approval or assumption of any agreement, contract, or lease under Bankruptcy Code
section 365. Likewise, if this Court grants the relief sought herein, any payment made pursuant
to the Court’s order is not intended and should not be construed as an admission as to the validity
of any claim or a waiver of the Debtors’ rights to dispute such claim subsequently.
NOTICE
20. No trustee, examiner, or creditors’ committee has been appointed in these chapter
11 cases. The Debtors have provided notice of this Motion to (a) the Office of the United States
Trustee for the District of Delaware, Attn: Jane Leamy, Esq.; (b) the entities listed on the
Consolidated List of Creditors Holding the 30 Largest Unsecured Claims filed pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 1007(d); (c) counsel to the agents under the Debtors’ pre-petition credit
facilities; (d) counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders; (e) counsel to the indenture
trustees under the Debtors’ pre-petition indentures; (f) the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission; (g) the United States Internal Revenue Service; and (h) any parties entitled to
notice pursuant to Local Rule 2002-1(b). In light of the nature of the relief requested in this
Motion, the Debtors respectfully submit that no further notice is necessary.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 10 of 11
11
WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, the Debtors respectfully request that the
Court (a) enter the Proposed Order substantially in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto
granting the relief requested in the Motion and (b) grant such other and further relief as may be
just and proper.
Wilmington, Delaware Date: March 25, 2015 /s/ Amanda R. Steele RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
Paul N. Heath (DE 3704) Amanda R. Steele (DE 5530) Rachel L. Biblo (DE 6012) One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: (302) 651-7700 Facsimile: (302) 651-7701 – and –
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Charles R. Gibbs (admitted pro hac vice) Sarah Link Schultz (admitted pro hac vice) 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 969-2800 Facsimile: (214) 969-4343 Ashleigh L. Blaylock (admitted pro hac vice) Kevin M. Eide (admitted pro hac vice) Robert S. Strauss Building 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20036-1564 Telephone: (202) 887-4000 Facsimile: (202) 887-4288 PROPOSED COUNSEL FOR DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122 Filed 03/25/15 Page 11 of 11
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) Quicksilver Resources Inc., et al.,1 ) Case No. 15-10585 (LSS) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered ) ) Hearing Date: April 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. (EDT)
) Obj. Deadline: April 8, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. (EDT)
NOTICE OF MOTION AND HEARING
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, on March 25, 2015, the above-captioned debtors and
debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed the Debtors’ Motion for an Order
Authorizing the Employment and Compensation of Professionals Utilized in the Ordinary Course
of Business Nunc Pro Tunc to the Petition Date (the “Motion”) with the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”).
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, any responses or objections to the Motion
must be filed in writing with the Bankruptcy Court, 824 N. Market Street, 3rd Floor, Wilmington,
Delaware 19801, and served upon and received by the undersigned proposed counsel for the
Debtors on or before April 8, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time).
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, if an objection is timely filed, served and
received and such objection is not otherwise timely resolved, a hearing to consider such
objection and the Motion will be held before The Honorable Laurie Selber Silverstein at the
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax
identification number, are: Quicksilver Resources Inc. [6163]; Barnett Shale Operating LLC [0257]; Cowtown Drilling, Inc. [8899]; Cowtown Gas Processing L.P. [1404]; Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc. [9774]; Cowtown Pipeline L.P. [9769]; Cowtown Pipeline Management, Inc. [9771]; Makarios Resources International Holdings LLC [1765]; Makarios Resources International Inc. [7612]; QPP Holdings LLC [0057]; QPP Parent LLC [8748]; Quicksilver Production Partners GP LLC [2701]; Quicksilver Production Partners LP [9129]; and Silver Stream Pipeline Company LLC [9384]. The Debtors’ address is 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 2
2
Bankruptcy Court, 824 N. Market Street, 6th Floor, Courtroom 2, Wilmington, Delaware 19801
on April 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time).
IF NO OBJECTIONS TO THE MOTION ARE TIMELY FILED, SERVED AND
RECEIVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS NOTICE, THE BANKRUPTCY COURT
MAY GRANT THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN THE MOTION WITHOUT FURTHER
NOTICE OR HEARING.
Wilmington, Delaware Date: March 25, 2015 /s/ Amanda R. Steele RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
Paul N. Heath (DE 3704) Amanda R. Steele (DE 5530) Rachel L. Biblo (DE 6012) One Rodney Square 920 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: (302) 651-7700 Facsimile: (302) 651-7701 – and –
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP Charles R. Gibbs (admitted pro hac vice) Sarah Link Schultz (admitted pro hac vice) 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 969-2800 Facsimile: (214) 969-4343 Ashleigh L. Blaylock (admitted pro hac vice) Kevin M. Eide (admitted pro hac vice) Robert S. Strauss Building 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20036-1564 Telephone: (202) 887-4000 Facsimile: (202) 887-4288 PROPOSED COUNSEL FOR DEBTORS AND DEBTORS IN POSSESSION
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-1 Filed 03/25/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit A
Proposed Order
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-2 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) Quicksilver Resources Inc., et al.,1 ) Case No. 15-10585 (LSS) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered )
ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND COMPENSATION OF PROFESSIONALS UTILIZED
IN THE ORDINARY COURSE OF BUSINESS NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE PETITION DATE
Upon the Motion2 of the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively,
the “Debtors”), for entry of this Order pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 105(a), 327, 328,
and 330 and Bankruptcy Rule 2014 authorizing the employment and compensation of
professionals utilized by the Debtors in the ordinary course of their business, all as further
described in the Motion; and the Court having jurisdiction to consider this Motion and the relief
requested therein in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334; and consideration of the
Motion and the relief requested therein being a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
§§ 157(b)(2); and venue being proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409;
and due and proper notice of the Motion being adequate and appropriate under the
circumstances; and a hearing having been held to consider the relief requested in the Motion; and
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax
identification number, are: Quicksilver Resources Inc. [6163]; Barnett Shale Operating LLC [0257]; Cowtown Drilling, Inc. [8899]; Cowtown Gas Processing L.P. [1404]; Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc. [9774]; Cowtown Pipeline L.P. [9769]; Cowtown Pipeline Management, Inc. [9771]; Makarios Resources International Holdings LLC [1765]; Makarios Resources International Inc. [7612]; QPP Holdings LLC [0057]; QPP Parent LLC [8748]; Quicksilver Production Partners GP LLC [2701]; Quicksilver Production Partners LP [9129]; and Silver Stream Pipeline Company LLC [9384]. The Debtors’ address is 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
2 All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein are to be given the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-2 Filed 03/25/15 Page 2 of 6
2
upon the First Day Declaration, the record of the hearing and all proceedings had before the
Court; and the Court having found and determined that the relief sought in the Motion is in the
best interests of the Debtors’ estates, their creditors, and other parties in interest and that the legal
and factual bases set forth in the Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and any
objections to the requested relief having been withdrawn or overruled on the merits; and after
due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED:
1. The Motion is granted to the extent provided herein.
2. The Debtors are authorized, in their discretion, to retain and pay reasonable fees
and expenses for the services of the OCPs, subject to the terms of any cash collateral or financing
order entered by the Court, in the ordinary course of their business.
3. The following procedures shall govern the retention and payment of OCPs:
(i) To ensure that none of the OCPs represent or hold any interest adverse to the Debtors or their estates with respect to the matter on which such professional is employed, each OCP shall be required to file a declaration (each, a “Declaration of Disinterestedness”) with the Court, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C, stating that it does not hold an interest materially adverse to the Debtors, and to serve its Declaration of Disinterestedness on the following parties: (a) Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100, Dallas, TX 75201, Attn: Charles R. Gibbs, Esq. and Sarah Link Schultz, Esq., counsel to the Debtors; (b) Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., One Rodney Square, 920 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: Paul N. Heath, Esq., Delaware counsel to the Debtors; (c) counsel to any official committee appointed in these cases; (d) Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, 425 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10017, Attn: Steven M. Fuhrman, Esq., counsel to the First Lien Agent; (e) Latham & Watkins LLP, 885 Third Avenue, Suite 1000, New York, NY 10022, Attn: Mitchell A. Seider, Esq., counsel to the Second Lien Agent; (f) Emmet, Marvin & Martin LLP, 120 Broadway, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10271, Attn: Edward P. Zujkowski, Esq., as counsel to the Second Lien Indenture Trustee; (g) Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, 28 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10005, Attn: Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. and Samuel A. Khalil, Esq., counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of Second Lienholders; and (h) the Office of the United States Trustee for Region 3, 844 King Street, Suite 2207, Lockbox 35, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: Jane Leamy, Esq.; and
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-2 Filed 03/25/15 Page 3 of 6
3
(i) those parties requesting notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002 (collectively, the “Notice Parties”).
(ii) The Notice Parties shall have seven days after the filing and service of a Declaration of Disinterestedness to object to the retention of the OCP filing such declaration (the “Objection Deadline”). Any objecting party shall serve its objection upon the Notice Parties and the relevant OCP on or before the Objection Deadline. If an objection cannot be consensually resolved within seven days after the Objection Deadline, then the retention of the OCP that is the subject of the objection shall be scheduled for hearing by the Debtors at the next regularly scheduled omnibus hearing date that is no less than fourteen days from that date or on a date otherwise agreed by the parties. The Debtors shall not be authorized to retain and pay such OCP until all outstanding objections have been withdrawn, resolved, or overruled by order of the Court.
(iii) If no objection is received by the Objection Deadline with respect to an OCP, the Debtors shall be authorized to retain and pay that OCP in accordance with these OCP Procedures.
(iv) The Debtors are authorized to pay any retained OCP, without further application to the Court, 100% of fees and disbursements upon submission of an appropriate invoice setting forth in reasonable detail the nature of the services rendered after the Petition Date and the fees and disbursements related thereto; provided, however, that each OCP’s fees, excluding costs and disbursements, do not exceed the OCP Cap.
(v) To the extent that an OCP seeks compensation in excess of the OCP Cap (the “Excess Fees”), the OCP shall file with the Court and serve on the Notice Parties, which service may be via email, a notice of fees in excess of the OCP Cap (the “Notice of Excess Fees”) and an invoice setting forth, in reasonable detail, the nature of the services rendered and disbursements actually incurred, Notice Parties shall then have fourteen days to object to the Notice of Excess Fees. If after fourteen days no objection is filed, the Excess Fees shall be deemed approved, and the OCP may be paid 100% of fees and 100% of its expenses without the need to file a fee application.
(vi) The Appendix B Fee Guidelines adopted by the EOUST shall not be applicable to the retention or compensation of any OCP employed or compensated by this Order; provided, however, that any OCP who exceeds the OCP Cap may be required to comply with the Appendix B Fee Guidelines thereafter to the extent reasonably requested by the U.S. Trustee.
(vii) At three-month intervals during the pendency of these chapter 11 cases beginning with the period of March 17, 2015 through June 30, 2015, and for each three-month period thereafter (each, a “Quarter”), the Debtors
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-2 Filed 03/25/15 Page 4 of 6
4
shall file with the Court and serve on the Notice Parties, no later than 30 days after the end of such Quarter, a statement that shall include the following information for each OCP: (a) the name of the OCP; (b) the aggregate amounts paid as compensation for services rendered and reimbursement of expenses incurred by that OCP during the reported Quarter; (c) all post-petition payments made to that OCP to date; and (d) a general description of the type of services rendered by that OCP.
(viii) The Debtors may retain additional OCPs from time to time during these chapter 11 cases by (a) including each additional OCP on a supplement to Exhibit B that shall be filed with the Court and served on the Notice Parties and (b) having such additional OCP comply with the OCP Procedures.
4. Any payment made pursuant to this Order is not intended and should not be
construed as an admission as to the validity or priority of any claim or as a waiver of the
Debtors’ rights to subsequently dispute such claim, and any such payment is not intended and
should not be construed as an assumption of any executory contract or obligation of the Debtors.
5. The Debtors are authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief
granted pursuant to this Order in accordance with the Motion.
6. The banks and financial institutions on which checks were drawn or electronic
payment requests made in payment of the pre-petition obligations approved herein are authorized
and directed to receive, process, honor, and pay all such checks and electronic payment requests
when presented for payment, provided that sufficient funds are on deposit in the applicable
accounts to cover such payments, and all such banks and financial institutions are authorized to
rely on the Debtors’ designation of any particular check or electronic payment request as being
approved by this Order.
7. Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h), 7062,
9014, or otherwise, this Order shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.
8.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-2 Filed 03/25/15 Page 5 of 6
5
9. The Court retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to
the interpretation or implementation of this Order.
Wilmington, Delaware Dated: April _____, 2015 ________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE LAURIE SELBER SILVERSTEIN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-2 Filed 03/25/15 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit B
List of Ordinary Course Professionals
NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OF
SERVICES
ALBERT NEELY & KUHLMANN LLP 1200 OIL& GAS BUILDING 309 WEST SEVENTH STREET FORT WORTH, TX 76102
Legal (title opinions)
CTMI LLC 12720 HILLCREST RD, SUITE 1010 DALLAS, TX 75230 Accounting (property tax)
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP 450 LEXINGTON AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10017 Legal (general corporate)
GREGORY G. GIBSON 2208 HAWTHORNE AVENUE FORT WORTH, TX 76110 Legal (oil and gas)
JONES DAY 2727 NORTH HARWOOD STREET DALLAS, TX 75201 Legal (401(k) advice)
KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP 201 MAIN, SUITE 2500 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 Legal (litigation defense; oil
and gas; tax-related litigation)
KPMG LLP SUITE 3100 717 NORTH HARWOOD STREET DALLAS, TX 75201-6585
Accounting (consultation regarding federal and state gross margin tax)
LITTLER MENDELSON PC PO BOX 45547 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94145-0547 Legal (employment and
immigration)
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP PO BOX 952282 DALLAS, TX 75395-2282 Accounting (accounting
consulting services)
WHITLEY PENN LLP 8343 DOUGLAS AVENUE SUITE 400 DALLAS, TX 75225
Accounting (preparation of federal and state tax returns)
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-3 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit C
Form Declaration of Disinterestedness
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-4 Filed 03/25/15 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) Quicksilver Resources Inc., et al.,1 ) Case No. 15-10585 (LSS) ) Debtors. ) Jointly Administered )
DECLARATION OF DISINTERESTEDNESS OF [NAME] IN
SUPPORT OF RETENTION AS AN ORDINARY COURSE PROFESSIONAL
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct:
1. I am a [title] of [name], located at [address] (the “Firm”).
2. The Debtors have requested that the Firm provide [service description] services to
the Debtors, and the Firm has consented to provide such services.
3. The Firm may have performed services in the past, may currently perform
services, and may perform services in the future in matters unrelated to these chapter 11 cases for
persons that are parties in interest in these chapter 11 cases. The Firm does not perform services
for any such person in connection with these chapter 11 cases or have any relationship with any
such person, their attorneys, or accountants that would be adverse to the Debtors or their estates,
except as follows: [PROFESSIONAL TO INSERT DISCLOSURE OF ANY NON-
MATERIAL, POTENTIALLY ADVERSE INTEREST TO THE DEBTORS.]
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax
identification number, are: Quicksilver Resources Inc. [6163]; Barnett Shale Operating LLC [0257]; Cowtown Drilling, Inc. [8899]; Cowtown Gas Processing L.P. [1404]; Cowtown Pipeline Funding, Inc. [9774]; Cowtown Pipeline L.P. [9769]; Cowtown Pipeline Management, Inc. [9771]; Makarios Resources International Holdings LLC [1765]; Makarios Resources International Inc. [7612]; QPP Holdings LLC [0057]; QPP Parent LLC [8748]; Quicksilver Production Partners GP LLC [2701]; Quicksilver Production Partners LP [9129]; and Silver Stream Pipeline Company LLC [9384]. The Debtors’ address is 801 Cherry Street, Suite 3700, Unit 19, Fort Worth, Texas 76102.
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-4 Filed 03/25/15 Page 2 of 3
2 109783324
4. [As part of its customary practice, the Firm is retained in cases, proceedings, and
transactions involving many different parties, some of whom may represent or be retained by the
Debtors, claimants, and parties in interest in these chapter 11 cases.]
5. Neither I nor any principal, partner, director, or officer of, or professional retained
by, the Firm has agreed to share or will share any portion of the compensation to be received
from the Debtors with any other person other than the principal and regular employees of the
Firm.
6. Neither I nor any principal, partner, director, or officer of, or professional retained
by, the Firm, insofar as I have been able to ascertain, holds or represents any interest adverse to
the Debtors or their estates with respect to the matter(s) upon which this Firm is to be retained,
except as follows: [PROFESSIONAL TO INSERT DISCLOSURE OF ANY NON-
MATERIAL, POTENTIALLY ADVERSE INTEREST TO THE DEBTORS.]
7. The Debtors owe the Firm $[_____] for pre-petition services, the payment of
which is subject to limitations contained in the Bankruptcy Code. The Firm understands that its
designation as an OCP does not entitle the Firm to payment services provided pre-petition
outside of a confirmed plan.
8. The Firm is conducting further inquiries regarding its retention by any creditors of
the Debtors, and upon conclusion of that inquiry, or at any time during the period of its retention,
if the Firm should discover any facts bearing on the matters described herein, the Firm will
supplement the information contained in this Declaration.
Executed on Date: [_______________], 2015 Name: Title:
Case 15-10585-LSS Doc 122-4 Filed 03/25/15 Page 3 of 3