incorporate cpv and continual improvement into your validation plan
DESCRIPTION
This workshop examines the approach to Continued Process Verification and demonstrating that your product and process are operating in a state of control and continue to do so over the life of the product. Without any prior coordination, the theme was elaborated by the afternoon speakers once the conference itself was underway. The concept of “step up step down” for adjusting the level of product scrutiny both for process parameters monitoring and for sampling and testing quality attributes was explored and developed.TRANSCRIPT
Incorporate CPV and Continual Improvement into Your Validation Plan
Presented by: Karen S Ginsbury PCI Pharmaceutical Consulting Israel Ltd IVT’s 4th Annual Validation Week Copenhagen, Denmark March 2013
Stage 1: Process Design Stage 2a: Equipment &
Facility Qualification
Stage 3: Continued Process Verification Stage 2b: Process
Performance Qualification
Stage 2: Process Qualification
To be considered…
• Regulatory requirements for Process Validation
• 21 CFR part 820 QSR
• 21 CFR part 211
• ICH Q10: PQS and Lifecycle
• EU Annex 15 and EU PV Guideline March 2012
• FDA process validation guide January 2011
• GHTF Guidance, 2004
• Inspectional observations and expectations
To be considered…
• II. Policy and Practice
• Adopt the lifecycle concept (Validation Policy)
• Policy: – Post launch for new products
– Legacy products
• CPV templates
• Data collection plan: product / process and CAPA sources
• Data analysis and feedback
To be considered…
III. Continual Improvement through managing variation
– Studying variables and variation using DOE in design
– Post Launch Scrutiny and Ongoing verification
– An ongoing exercise to increase efficiency (the real “lean”)
Validation = Intensive Testing
"My Bread is Fresh and Tasty”
Can’t test quality into a product
Must design quality into a product
21 CFR 820 Subpart C: 820.30(f) Design verification
• Each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures for verifying the device design
• Design verification shall confirm that the design output meets the design input requirements
• The results of the design verification, including identification of the design, method(s), the date, and the individual(s) performing the verification, shall be documented in the DHF
21 CFR 820 Subpart C: 820.30(g) Design validation
• Each manufacturer shall establish and maintain procedures for validating the device design
• Design validation shall be performed under defined operating conditions on initial production units, lots, or batches, or their equivalents
• Design validation shall ensure that devices conform to defined user needs and intended uses and shall include testing of production units under actual or simulated use conditions
• Design validation shall include software validation and risk analysis, where appropriate
• The results of the design validation, including identification of the design, method(s), the date, and the individual(s) performing the validation, shall be documented in the DHF
GMP Regulations - cfr
21 cfr 211.68 Automatic/mechanical/electronic equipment..routinely calibrated /inspected/checked to assure proper performance
21 cfr 211.110 Establish control procedures to assure batch uniformity. Monitor output, validate performance or manufacturing processes that may be causing product variability
ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System
Annex 15 -EU DQ, VMP, PQ / PV, Cleaning
Annex 15 -EU
Validation
Action of proving, in accordance with principles of GMP, that any procedure, process, equipment, material, activity or system actually leads to the expected results (see also Qualification)
EU Rules & Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Annex 15
Qualification
Action of proving that any equipment works correctly and actually leads to the expected results.
The word “validation” is sometimes widened to incorporate the concept of qualification
EU Rules & Guidance for Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Annex 15 – “In-Use” Facilities
Qualification of established (in-use) facilities, systems and equipment
• Evidence should be available to support and verify the operating parameters and limits for the critical variables of the operating equipment
• Additionally, the calibration, cleaning, preventative maintenance, operating procedures and operator training procedures and records should be documented
FDA PV Guidance
15
Process validation definition
• …the collection and evaluation of data, from the process design stage throughout production, which establishes scientific evidence that a process is capable of consistently delivering (product meeting its CQAs and intended use KSG) quality product
• …involves a series of activities taking place over the lifecycle of the product and process
2011 FDA Guidance
Life Cycle Approach
Identification of process variables
Control strategy
Process qualification
Process monitoring
and improvement
Process design
PROCESS
VALIDATION
FDA Process Validation 2011 Stage Purpose Activities
Process Design Define commercial process based on
knowledge gained through
development and scale up activities
Outcome: design a process for routine
manufacture that will consistently
deliver product meeting its (critical)
quality attributes
Integrated product and process design
Product development activities
DOE combined with Risk Assessment
to explore process parameters,
variability, effect on quality attributes
and process controls
Process
Qualification
Confirm process design as capable of
reproducible commercial manufacturing
Facility design
Equipment & utilities qualification
Process Performance qualification
Emphasis on use of statistically based
sampling plans, statistically valid
acceptance criteria and statistical
analysis of process data to understand
process consistency and performance
Continued
Process
Verification
Provide ongoing assurance that the
process remains in a state of control
during routine production through
quality procedures and continuous
improvement initiatives
Organized data collection every batch
Data trending and statistical analysis
Product review
Equipment and facility maintenance
Calibration
Management review and production
Employee feedback
Continuous improvement
Worst Case
• A condition or set of conditions encompassing upper and lower processing limits and circumstances, within standard operating procedures, which pose the greatest chance of product or process failure when compared to ideal conditions
• Such conditions do not necessarily induce product or process failure
- Annex 15 glossary
GHTF Guidance 2004
GHTF: PV within the QMS
• Process validation is part of the integrated requirements of a Quality Management System
• It is conducted in the context of a system including design and development:
– Control
– Qualiity assurance
– Process control
– CAPA
PV Decision Tree
Warning Letter
Water System Warning
And the Big One….
• Failure to establish a written procedure to calibrate, inspect, and check automated, mechanical, or electronic equipment used to manufacture drug products to assure proper performance. [21 CFR 211.68 (a)]
• Specifically, there is no data to demonstrate that production equipment (two mixers, one filler, a water system) has been properly validated (installation qualification, operational qualification, and performance qualification) as acceptable for its intended uses
EMA Draft Guideline (March 2012)
Any problems you can see here?
EMA Draft Guideline (March 2012)
EMA Draft Guideline (March 2012)
EMA Draft Guideline (March 2012)
And now to policy and practice: implementation