increasing student engagement while reducing textbook costs using ginkgotree
DESCRIPTION
July 8th, 2014 , Sloan-C Blended ConferenceTRANSCRIPT
Increasing Student Engagement While Reducing Textbook Costs Using GinkgoTree
July 8th, 2014Sloan-C Blended Conference
Download at slideshare.net/tjoosten
Why pilot Ginkgotree?
Open textbook authoring
Mobile devices Video sharing eTexts0
10
20
30
40
50
60
42 46 44 4927 20 25 2531 34 31 26
What are you interested in learning more about?
Very/interested Neutral Very/uninterested
M=2.94M=2.99 M=2.96 M=2.79
Solution
Why use Ginkgotree in your class?
Enhanced the packaging of content
Improved access to content
Increased interactivity
An Example: English course
What did students think?
Easy
Agree Neutral Disagree
Ginkgotree 86.7 8.4 4.8
Registering 80.7 9.6 9.6
Features and navigation 78.3 10.8 7.2
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
Ease of use
EngagedCC Flickr Vandy CFT
Agree Neutral Disagree
Feel like part of the class 50.6 32.5 10.8
Increase participation 51.8 26.5 18.1
Increase interaction with content 61.4 28.9 6
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
Engagement
Learned
CC Flickr katherine.a
Agree Neutral Disagree
Understand course material 68.7 30.1 1.2
Benefical to learning 68.7 26.5 4.8
Helped connect ideas 59 32.5 7.2
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
Learning
Liked!
Agree Neutral Disagree
Another course 61.4 28.9 7.2
Recommend continued use 73.5 18.1 8.4
Overall 71.1 21.7 7.2
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
Satisfaction
Agree Neutral Disagree
More portable 73.5 19.3 6
More relevant content 61.4 27.7 9.6
Better than 57.8 24.1 13.3
Prefer over 55.4 25.3 19.3
Learned more 48.2 37.3 14.5
Read more 50.6 27.7 20.5
5152535455565758595
Textbook comparison
Learning
Satisfaction
Engagement
(r = .84, p<.001)
(r = .67, p<.001)
(r = .60, p<.001)
What surprised us?
Flexibility
Agree Neutral Disagree
Greater flexibility to learn 66.3 24.1 7.2
Better organize and structure learn-ing
62.7 26.5 10.8
More efficient study time 59 31.3 8.4
5
25
45
65
85
Predicts learning
Flexibility
Engagement
Learning
F(2, 144) = 328.60, p<.001
Approximately 82% of the variance accounted for by flexibility and interactivity(adjusted R2 = .818)
Recommendations
Based on the results of our data analyses from the student and
instructor surveys
Use OER
Annotate text
Agree Neutral Disagree
Annotations connected to instruc-tor
62.9 26.5 10.6
5152535455565758595
Make Active
Annotation Highlighting Commenting Discussions
Use Rich Content
Book Chapters
(2)
Articles Videos (3)
Images Audio Web Pages
(1)
Check Pricing
Connect and Share
CC Flickr bengray
Make Time
CC Flickr zamboni.andrea
Not just an e-text
Questions
Resources
• Faculty interests survey• Ginkgotree instructor midterm evaluation
survey• Ginkgotree end-of-the-semester student
survey• Ginkgotree end-of-the-semester instructor
survey
Not included
Agree Neutral Disagree
Improved overall grade 43.4 42.2 9.6
Got better grades 34.9 44.6 18.1
Discussions helped do better 47 34.9 4.8
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
Performance
Agree Neutral Disagree
Ginkgotree introduction 84.2 13.2 2.6
Ginkgotree instructions 88 10.6 1.3
Recommend instructor 79.4 13.2 7.3
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
Satisfaction