independent review into the future security of the national electricity market

29
Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market (NEM) (The Finkel Review) Aurecon summary of panel findings and recommendations

Upload: aurecon

Post on 23-Jan-2018

24.498 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

Independent Review into theFuture Security of the National Electricity Market (NEM)

(The Finkel Review)

Aurecon summary of panel findings and recommendations

Page 2: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

Table of Contents

Sense making & shared benefits 3 - 5

System Security 6

Low Emissions Transition 10

The Role of Gas 13

System Planning 16

Rewarding Customers 19

Stronger Governance 23

Glossary 27

Contact 28

Page 3: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

3

Sense making The Review contains 50 recommendations in total. All but the Clean Energy Target have been

adopted by the government – with four key outcomes sought

Page 4: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

4

Sense making The Review contains a matrix for success – spread across three pillars

Page 5: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

5

Shared benefits

Government

Clear line of sight for planning energy policy and delivery

Business

Clarity around making investment decisions

Customers

Improved supply continuity and pricing

Environment

Reduced emissions

We shouldn’t have iStock

logo images on here!

Page 6: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

System Security

Page 7: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

7

Withdrawal of synchronous generation is

reducing security

− Less physical inertia

− International experience shows that in large

power systems, such as the NEM, FFR cannot

provide a complete substitute for physical inertia

− Minimum levels of physical inertia are required

− Demand side FFR should be further considered

System restart capability

− Can we get the system back up in case of a

system wide blackout?

System Security: Issues identified

Lack of DER visibility to AEMO

− Makes management of power system more

difficult

Solutions should be technology neutral, they

should also be supply side/demand side

neutral

− Specify technical parameters of the service, not

the technology

− Market mechanisms preferred, however non-

market approaches may still be required

Page 8: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

8

TNSPs to quantify minimum required inertia

levels

− Also quantify the proportion to be substituted by

synthetic inertia (FFR)

Review and update connection standards

requirements

− Existing performance requirements are written

for synchronous generators (considerations:

FFR/FCAS, SCC, inertia, power ramp rates due

to changing weather, etc.)

All new generators to provide fast frequency

response capability

System Security: Recommendations

Full disclosure by generators of parameters

which could affect security or reliability

Three yearly review of connection standards

for generators

Page 9: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

9

Establish a data collection framework/mechanism for DER

− At a suitable aggregate level

− Map locations of clusters of DER for inclusion in power system models

Cyber security

− Annual report on the cyber security preparedness/maturity

National skills assessment for workforce skill

− Need: Power system engineers, data specialists in analytics and visualisation, cyber security specialists,

software programmers with an energy specialisation

System Security: Recommendations

Page 10: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

Low Emissions

Transition

Page 11: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

11

As coal plants are retired, the NEM will need dispatchable capacity:

− Clean coal, gas, hydro, solar thermal, biomass, interconnectors, storage and demand response

Wind and solar PV (not dispatchable), will therefore require complementary dispatchable

capacity to maintain reliability

Issue with energy market: VRE capacity has been pulling wholesale prices down, inhibiting

investment in dispatchable capacity – issue is if generators exit the market at short notice

things could switch from a NEM capacity oversupply to undersupply in a short period

Low Emissions Transition: Issues identified

Page 12: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

12

Capacity market is not recommended

− Too big a transition, will take too long to implement, more immediate reliability concerns

− Instead: Provide long term investor confidence and greater control to AEMO

Whole of economy emissions reduction strategy

Large generators to provide three year notice of closure

Emissions reduction mechanism (CET)

AEMO to identify and ensure adequate dispatchable capacity is available in each region

“Generator Reliability Obligation”

Low Emissions Transition: Recommendations

Page 13: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

The Role of Gas

Page 14: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

14

NEM is likely to require higher levels of gas fired generation to support VRE

− Gas generators will need to switch in and out, provide fast ramp rates while operating and require more

starts (depending on intermittent generation)

− Aging, inefficient turbines will need to replaced with more modern turbines at the same sites

AEMO should have better oversight of gas supply contracts to ensure sufficient supply is

available

Need to avoid blanket restrictions/bans on gas projects, encourage development of the industry

The Role of Gas: Issues identified

Page 15: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

15

Gas generators to provide info to AEMO on fuel resource adequacy and fuel supply contracts

to enable assessment of fuel (and subsequently generator) availability

Increase community trust and understanding on gas (including hydraulic fracturing) by mid-

2019

− COAG Energy Council to bring together scientific and regulatory data in an easy to understand

format

The Role of Gas: Recommendations

Page 16: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

System Planning

Page 17: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

17

Whole of system planning approach required− Considering interstate generation availability,

interstate interconnectors

− No longer appropriate to plan the network at a state/jurisdictional level

Optimise the design of the network to enable connection of new renewable energy resources− Providing capacity for new renewable generators

− Integrated grid plan: renewable energy zones, concept line routes to connect, quality of resource, cost, network impacts etc.

− High level assessment of economics of the zones

− Publically available

System Planning: Issues identified

Co-ordination of generation and

transmission investment

− Transition requires closer co-operation

between NSPs and generators in making

investment decisions

Page 18: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

18

System Planning: Recommendations

Develop integrated grid plan by 2018

− Facilitate efficient development and connection of

renewable energy

AEMO to identify priority projects which

governments may need to support if market is

unable to deliver

− Framework is required to achieve this

− Cost to be allocated in NSP revenue proposal &

recovered through users

COAG Energy Council to review AEMO’s role in

national network planning

Reforms to limited merits review regime

Further reviews to enhance effectiveness of

RIT-T & RIT-D

Page 19: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

Rewarding

Customers

Page 20: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

20

Improved access to data for consumers,

service providers, system operators and policy

makers is required

− More transparency and clarity on electricity prices

so customers can understand and compare prices,

know when discounts expire etc

− Customers should have access to consumption

data in real time and control over who can access

this data

− Smart meters are the required enabling technology

Rewarding Customers: Issues identified

Reward consumers financially for participating

in demand management, energy efficiency,

security and reliability improvement

− Demand response is cheaper and faster to

implement than new infrastructure construction

− International evidence is that for long term

customer participation in DR to occur, orchestrated

demand response through a service provider

under an agreement is preferred

− An estimated 2000MW of load in the NEM is

considered price responsive to a cost saving

Page 21: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

21

To obtain value from DER, dispatch needs to be coordinated to be material

− Example: ARENA/AEMO 100MW demand response by December 2017

Opt in payment

Further curtailment payment

Incentivising networks to avoid capex‒ Current model of economic regulation may not be providing enough incentive for networks to

consider non-network solutions

‒ Alternate economic model: Single estimate of efficient total expenditure (totex) rather than separate

capex and opex determinations

Rewarding Customers: Issues identified

Page 22: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

22

As part of its existing inquiry into the retail market, the ACCC should make recommendations

on improving the transparency and clarity of electricity retail prices

COAG Energy Council to remove complexities and make it easier for customers to access

and share their energy data

AEMC to recommend a mechanism that facilitates DR in the wholesale energy market – draft

rule change ready by mid 2018

AEMC to assess alternative models for revenue setting (totex approach) by mid-2019

Rewarding Customers: Recommendations

Page 23: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

Stronger

Governance

Page 24: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

24

No agency currently has explicit responsibility

under legislation to track emerging risks in

relation to the power system

− A new body is required to:

Report on Health of the NEM

Report on actions being undertaken to respond

to risks

Provide whole of system oversight for security

and reliability

Market body boards, have insufficient power

system engineering representation

− AEMO in particular requires network expertise on

the board, currently only has generation, retail and

energy market backgrounds

Governance: Issues identified

Response to change: NER have failed to keep

up with changes in technology and the NEM

− Time taken for end-to-end rule changes too long

(one year)

− Existing NER too long and too complex

Page 25: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

25

AER needs a data strategy to ensure:

− Visibility of DER

− Consumption data sharing

− Changing drivers of demand & demand

forecasting

− Note: CSIRO Energy Use Data Model will help

address this issue but a funding, governance

structure needs to be in place to support this data

gathering and provision under law

Current level of AER funding considered

inadequate compared to the resource

requirements and workload

Governance: Issues identified

Perception of incumbency bias in AEMO due to

funding model which relies on industry co-

contributions

No single organisation has a complete view of

the NEM – less visibility of emerging threats

Page 26: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

26

COAG to establish an Energy Security Board

to implement the panel’s recommendations

and provide whole of system oversight for

security and reliability

AEMC or other suitable body to complete by

2020 a comprehensive review to streamline

the NER

Vertigan review recommendations to expedite

the rule making process be implemented by

end of 2017

Governance: Recommendations

Increase funding to the AER

New skills matrix for AEMO directors to

ensure power systems engineers are

represented

AER to develop a data strategy for the NEM

Page 27: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

27

Acronym Definition Explanation

ACCC Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Australia’s competition regulator and national consumer law authority.

AEMO Australian Energy Market Operator AEMO is responsible for the administration and operation of the wholesale national electricity

market in accordance with the National Electricity Rules.

AEMC Australian Energy Market Commission The rule maker for the Australian electricity and gas markets.

ARENA Australian Renewable Energy Agency ARENA funds innovation and shares knowledge relating to renewable energy.

CET Clean Energy Target A policy mechanism that provides an incentive for new low emissions forms of energy generation

to enter the market.

COAG Council of Australian Governments An organisation consisting of the federal government, the governments of the six states and two

mainland territories and the Australian Local Government Association.

DR Demand Response A change in energy usage by a customer in response to a change in price or incentive payment.

DER Distributed Energy Resources Small sources of power such as roof-top solar PV, diesel generators, home battery storage which

can be aggregated to enable a broader demand management response.

FCAS Frequency Control Ancillary Services A market in the NEM under which participants bid for the provision of active power to regulate

power system frequency.

FFR Fast Frequency Response An injection of active power at the right time, magnitude and phase in order to stabilise a power

system following a disturbance event such as loss of a generator, or transmission line.

NEM National Electricity Market The wholesale electricity market for the electrically connected states and territories of eastern and

southern Australia.

NER National Electricity Rules The rules which under the force of law govern the operation of the NEM.

NSP Network Service Provider A business or organisation which owns and operates an energy supply network, i.e. the grid.

PV Photovoltaic An electrical device which converts solar energy to electrical energy, also known as a solar cell.

RIT-T/D Regulatory Investment Test – Transmission/Distribution A cost benefit analysis process required to be followed by NSPs for investment in regulated asset

network augmentations of a cost over a particular threshold.

SCC Short Circuit Current The magnitude of electrical current that flows under short circuit (fault conditions). SCC is a

measure of the strength of the power system at a particular location.

VRE Variable Renewable Energy An energy resource which is non-dispatchable, i.e. the fuel source is fluctuating and not

controllable such as wind or solar power.

Glossary

Page 28: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

28

Discuss the Finkel Review

Dr Alex WonhasManaging Director, Energy, Resources & Manufacturing

E: [email protected]

Paul GleesonEnergy Leader, East Coast Australia

E: [email protected]

Aneetha de SilvaManaging Director – Government

E: [email protected]

Victor YoungClient Director – Energy, ANZ

E: [email protected]

Page 29: Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market

Follow us on

www.twitter.com/Aurecon

Join us on

www.facebook.com/Aurecon

Watch us on

www.youtube.com/user/AureconGroup

Follow us on

www.instagram.com/Aurecon

Follow us on

www.linkedin.com/company/Aurecon

Follow us on

www.slideshare.net/Aurecon