independet study report 2012 2 28_zgl.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
1
Building Control Systems Modeling A Case Study using Syracuse COE Headquarter
Independent Study Final Report
By
Korbaga F. Woldekidan
Wenyi Jin
Zhigao Li
Advisor:
Jianshun (Jensen)Zhang
2
1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………4
2. SYRACUSE COE Builiding……………………………….……………………………………………………….………..………5
2.1 Background………………………………………………………………………………………………….……….……………5
2.1.1 Objective …………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………6
2.1.2 Scope ………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………6
2.2 Building Features ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7
2.2.1 Overall Building Features …………………………………………………………………………….………..7
2.2.2 Building Envelope ………………………………………………………………………………………….………..11
2.2.3 Zones and Occupancy …………………………………………………………………………………...………14
2.2.4 Internal Heat Sources …………………………………………………………….…………….…...………….15
2.2.5 Set Point Temperatures …………………………………………………………………….………………………18
2.3 HVAC System ……………………………………………………………………………………….………………..…………19
2.3.1 HVAC System Overview ……………………………………………………………….………….…….…………19
2.3.2 Air System ……………………………………………………………………………………….……….……….…20
2.3.3 Water System ……………………………………………………………………………………….……….….………27
3. Modeling and Simulation with BCVTB and Energy+ ……………………………………………..….…….……36
3.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………36
3.2 BCVTB Platform ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………36
3.2.1 Structure and Functionality ………………………………………………………………………….…………36
3.2.2 Interface with Energy+ ………………………………………………………………………………….…………37
3.2.3 Interface with Dymola …………………………………………………………………………………….………38
3.3 Energy+ Model for COE Enclosure ………………………………………………………….……….…………40
3.3.1 Create an EnergyPlus idf file for COE enclosure ………………………………………………………40
3.3.2 Add the exchanged schedule and variable with BCVTB ………………………………………40
3.4 Modelica Model for HVAC system …………………………………….………………….……. ……………41
3.5 Whole Building Model using BCVTB to couple Enclosure and HVAC system ………… ……42
3.5.1 Create a configuration file for Energy+ IDF file ………………………………………… ….………42
3.5.1 Create a BCVTB model to integrate Energy+ and Dymola ………………………………………43
4. Modeling and Simulation Using Modelica ………………..…………………………………….………….…………44
4.1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………….……..…………………44
4.1.1 Features of Modelica ……………………………………………………………………………….……………44
4.1.2 Objective and Scope ……………………………………………………………………………….……………44
4.2 Case Study: Heat Transfer Lab ……………………………………………………………………………….……45
4.2.1 Description of the facility ………………………………………………………………………….…………45
4.2.2 Model assumptions and representation. …………………………………………………………..…46
4.2.3 Communication logic between Energy plus and Dymola ………………………………………48
5. Results and Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………49
5.1 Simulatoin ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………49
5.2 Results ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………49
6. Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………52
3
1. INTRODUCTION
In the modern world, Buildings consume quite enormous amount of energy and different
researches are emerging with the objective of making buildings more efficient from energy
consumption point of view. In practical application it is often difficult to see the effect of
different energy saving strategies until those strategies are implemented in the actual
Building. Usually investors don’t want to take risk before knowing whether the strategy could
really save the claimed energy saving or not. To alleviate this problem different simulation
tools are coming that can be used for checking the performance of new energy saving
strategies before being implemented in the actual building. Some of the existing energy
simulation tools include Energy Plus, google scetchup, Design Builder, Ecotec etc
Even if Energy plus has quite a variety of models that can be used for representing a building
with its HVAC system it is not friendly to use for the fact that it uses a high level language
(text based) for defining the configuration of the building geometry and HVAC systems. One
way of reducing the difficulty of Energy plus is through the use of other software with
graphical user interface like Design builder and Scatchup for geometry definition and some
simple HVAC system definition which can be later transported as an idf file to energy plus for
detail definition of the system
Currently Energy plus is the most widely used and matured simulation software in the
building simulation research society. Despite the richness of Energy plus in terms of available
mechanical component models, it lacks a way to define modern control system and
Lawrence Berkley National laboratory is coming up with an idea of interfacing Energy plus
with other simulation software or programming languages like Matlab through the use of
BCVTB (Building controls virtual test bed) so that modern control systems can be designed
outside Energy plus and can dictate the components in the energy plus.
In this paper we make use of a new simulation tool known as Modelica , an object oriented
programming language to define our HVAC system together with its control system so that It
can be interfaced with Energy plus for whole building energy simulation through the use of
BCVTB. Modelica is used for its ease of graphical representation and possibility to develop
our own component model or models from existing library.
4
2. SYRACUSE COE BUILDING
2.1 Background The LEED Platinum Certified Syracuse CoE Headquarters building is a test bed for
environmental and energy technologies and building innovations. The facility includes an
array of high-end technologies which is foreseen as an excellent source to carry out
research and development.
The various features are - Total Indoor Environmental Quality [TIEQ] Lab, Green Roof,
Geothermal System, Lighting and Control Systems, Natural Ventilation, Personal
Ventilation Systems, Advanced Building Heat Recovery/Reuse Systems, Air Quality
Monitoring of Outside Air and Integrated Controls for Improving/Protecting Indoor Air,
Building Materials Testing, Rain Water Capture and Reuse. As we can see, most of these
features are concerned with improving the energy performance.
And more importantly the Syracuse CoE Headquarters building has lab and office space
available. Companies and organizations are going to be investing in the building areas for
offering services, development and research by making use of the thoroughly unique
facilities and/or functions in the building.
Figure2.1.1: Syracuse CoE Headquarters building
This iconic, high-performance, LEED-Platinum designed "living laboratory" is the
realization of a dream shared by leaders in government, industry, and academia to create
a world-renowned location for collaborations that address global challenges in clean and
renewable energy, indoor environmental quality, and water resources.
5
Syracuse Center of Excellence Headquarters Quick Facts:
Cost: $41 million (funded from state and private sources)
Size: 55,000 square feet
Location: 727 E. Washington Street, Syracuse, NY, 13210. The three-acre site on the
corner of Almond and Washington streets is a designated “brownfield,” the former site
of the LC Smith typewriter factory and Midtown Plaza.
Number of Stories: 5
LEED Rating: Platinum
Uses: Offices for SyracuseCoE staff; classrooms; public spaces; indoor environmental
quality (IEQ), biomass fuel, and other research laboratories for use by SyracuseCoE
academic and industry partners.
Main Laboratory: Willis H. Carrier Total Indoor Environmental Quality Lab—the only
research facility of its kind in the world, a space to conduct controlled experiments on
the human response to indoor environments (temperature, air quality, odor, light, etc).
Funded by NY State Offi ce of Science, Technology, and Academic Research (NYSTAR)
and Carrier Corp.
Urban Ecosystem Observatory: The 150-foot Urban Ecosystem Observatory takes
measurements of outdoor air quality to help research into urban air pollution and the
impact of buildings on urban ecosystems.
2.1.1 Objective
The objectives of Chapter 2 are,
1. Introducing the SyracuseCoE Headquarter.
2. Giving information to another two partners for Building control system modeling.
2.1.2 Scope
The Mechanical Control Systems of the SyracuseCoE Building include Heat Pump system,
Control Heating Water System, Chilled Water System, Radiant System, Air System, and TIEQ
Air System. In this study, we will only cover the Mechanical Control Systems. Other systems
like Sound Control System and Lighting System will not be included in this study.
6
2.2 Building Features
2.2.1 Overall Building Features
The COE building has five floors each floor having different zones with different activities and
floor area. Below is an overview of some of the features of the SyracuseCoE Headquarter
that make it so "green" .
1. Restrooms - Restrooms feature waterless urinals, dual flush low-flow toilets and faucets,
and sustainable paper and cleaning products.
2. Furniture - Furniture by Haworth and Herman Miller is made from recycled materials
and FSC wood and wood products. Furniture is also 100% recyclable by the
manufacturers upon return.
3. Insulation - Solid façades include superior insulation to reduce heating and cooling loads.
Interior insulation uses Demilec, a 100% soy-based spray foam. Exterior insulation
boards were created from sustainable natural fiber materials.
4. Vapor Intrusion System - Ventilation below the foundation prevents underground vapors
from entering the building, eliminating a potential source of contaminants in indoor air.
5. Storm Water Retention Tank - The southwest corner of the property features a storm
water retention tank to control run-off entering the sewer system.
6. Urban Ecosystem Observatory - The 150-foot Urban Ecosystem Observatory tower is
being used for a long-term, one-of-a-kind study that will assess Syracuse’s urban air
quality, air flow, and how outside air affects air quality inside a building.
7. Demand-Controlled Ventilation - The amount of fresh air delivered to a room varies
depending on the number of people who are present, saving energy when rooms are
partially occupied.
8. Building Shape and Form - The building is relatively narrow with extensive windows,
providing a high level of occupant comfort with ample natural light and opportunities for
views and natural ventilation.
9. Windows - The south façade features highly insulated glass with integrated electronically
controlled blinds that provide solar heat and glare control, capable of operation at
15-degree increments. The ceramic white dots on the windows passively reduce glare
and solar heat gain.
10. Radiant Ceilings - Most of the heating and cooling in rooms is provided via ceiling panels
that are embedded with copper piping that efficiently carries warm or cool water.
11. Underfloor Ventilation and Raised Flooring - Ventilation is provided close to occupants
for improved thermal comfort using a raised floor system, allowing for even air
distribution with lower fan speeds. The Tate raised floor system, situated 12 inches
above the concrete deck, also provides convenient wire routing.
12. Brownfield Remediation - Environmental contamination associated with previous
industrial site uses was remediated, restoring the site for sustained use by future
generations.
13. Sustainable Construction Practices - The construction team, led by LeChase, diverted 98%
of construction waste from going to a landfill.
14. Roof - The building roof is designed to reflect most of the sunlight, minimizing solar heat
gain and reducing the cooling load. The roof is also designed to allow future installation
7
of photovoltaics, building-scale wind turbines, and roof top HVAC units.
Features of the Lobby:
1. Regenerative Elevator - The Otis elevator generates electricity on the way down, which
can then be used for going back up, used elsewhere in the building, or fed back into the
grid.
2. Reception Desk - The desk, built by Syracuse firm CabFab, features an e2e Materials
product that uses renewable fibers processed with a soy protein-based resin system.
3. Underfl oor Heating - Hot water is circulated through tubes embedded in the lobby floor
to provide efficient heating with a high level of comfort.
Features of the Lab Wing:
1. Façade Testbed - The south façade of the laboratory wing includes an opening of the
building envelope that can be used to test future building envelope and window systems.
The current research apparatus was installed into the curtain wall unit by licensees
HeliOptix and Island External Fabricators.
2. Solar Power Prototype - This is the first building-integrated concentrating photovoltaic
system, developed by researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute with collaborators
at Harvard University, and tracks the motion of the sun and uses lenses to concentrate
sunlight 500 times, generating both electricity and heat. This system was developed with
funding from NYSERDA, NYSTAR, and the US Department of Energy. It is being tested in
collaboration with SyracuseCoE.
3. Biofuels R&D Lab - An advanced biofuels laboratory is planned in the east end of the
laboratory wing to develop new methods of extracting and synthesizing fuels and
chemicals using woody biomass as feed material.
4. Water Tank - Rain and meltwater are collected from the roof, stored in an 8,000-gallon
Figure2.2.1-1: Syracuse CoE Headquarters building
8
tank, and used to flush toilets, reducing both the consumption of drinkable water and
the amount of water that is discharged to the sewer.
5. Laboratory Exhaust - Air from laboratories is exhausted at low speed via a tall stack,
which saves energy compared to conventional high-speed designs.
6. Energy Recovery Ventilator - All buildings need to breathe fresh air. In winter and
summer replacing indoor air consumes energy to heat or cool incoming air. This
advanced energy recovery ventilator exchanges heat and moisture between outgoing
and incoming air streams, significantly reducing the amount of energy required to
condition incoming air.
Features of the 2nd Floor:
1. Carpet - Carpet tiles by InterfaceFLOR are made from recycled materials and installed
with minimal adhesive. Zero waste was created by our order: extra carpet tiles were sent
back to the manufacturer to be used for another order.
2. Boiler - The boiler, made by The Fulton Companies, touts 93% efficiency and uses the
latent heat of vaporization to create more heat.
3. Heat Pumps - Carrier heat pumps optimally manage the heating and cooling needs of
the building.
4. Geothermal Pipes - Heat exchanged with the ground—via water circulated through more
than five miles of tubing installed in 49 300-foot-deep wells—is used for both heating
and cooling, saving about 35% of energy compared to traditional systems. With a
constant temperature of 53 degrees, the groundwater helps heat the building in the
winter and cools it in the summer.
Features of the 3rd Floor:
1. Green Roof - Plantings on the
laboratory roof, made up of six
different varieties of sedum,
provide rainwater retention and a
visible connection to nature, while
also reducing the heat island effect.
2. Kitchenette - Cabinets were
created by RB Woodcraft out of a
unique e2e Materials product that
uses renewable fibers processed
with a soy protein-based resin
system.
3. SyracuseCoE Offices - The third
floor houses SyracuseCoE staff, who
works to catalyze collaborations
among academic, industry, and
government partners to create environmental and energy innovations for a sustainable
Figure 2.2.1-2: The layers of the green roof at
SyracuseCoE
9
future. The open office configuration allows for maximum daylighting, air circulation, and
enhanced views. This suite will be used for testing of new heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning systems.
4. EFC Offices - This space houses the Environmental Finance Center at Syracuse University
(EFC) staff, who work to enhance the administrative and financial capacities of state and
local government officials and the nonprofit and private sectors as they endeavor to
improve environmental infrastructure and quality of life.
5. Natural Ventilation Indicator Lights - Manual windows are provided to allow for natural
ventilation throughout the building. Red and green lights alert occupants when it is best
to open windows based on measurements of outdoor temperature, humidity, air quality,
and wind speeds. While the windows are open, sensors notify the building management
system to reduce the amount of mechanical ventilation to save energy.
Features of the 4th Floor:
1. Building Management System - The building automation system installed by Siemens
ensures that heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC), and other building systems
perform in harmony. The system provides information needed to maximize energy
efficiencies and optimize indoor air quality, such as advising occupants when outside
conditions are favorable for natural ventilation, controlling the amount of artificial
lighting, and managing the blind controls to reduce glare and heat gain.
2. Interstitial Mechanical Equipment Room - This area provides flexible space to install and
test new heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems.
3. Air Treatment Modules (ATMs) - These Carrier ATM units are European technologies
being introduced in the US for the first time. They allow individuals to control their
environment to meet personal preferences at desktops located at the Carrier TIEQ Lab.
Energy use measurements for these units allow for optimal control of comfort while
balancing energy consumption.
Features of the 5th Floor:
1. Willis H. Carrier Total Indoor
Environmental Quality (TIEQ)
Laboratory - A unique facility,
funded by NYSTAR, Carrier, and
Empire State Development, in
which researchers will study how
multiple factors—including
temperature, humidity, air quality,
lighting, and sound—combine to
affect human health and
performance in built
environments.
2. P. Ole Fanger Room - This room is
dedicated to the memory of Prof. Figure 2.2.1-2: Room on the 5th floor with
electronically controlled blinds
10
P. Ole Fanger of Denmark for his contributions to the field of thermal comfort and
ventilation, and for his service as University Professor at Syracuse University during
2006-07.
2.2.2 Building Envelope
The COE building has five floors each floor having different zones with different activities and
floor area. Data with regards to building geometry, materials, zones, occupancy, openings,
lighting, internal heat source has been collected from
Architectural and mechanical design drawings of the case study building
From the final reports of class HVAC in 2009.
Textbook and references for the thermal properties of materials.
Site visit to see geometry, outlook, materials and orientation of the building
Own estimates and approximations on issues where data is not available or difficult
to get (internal heat and pollutant source)
The building envelop is made out of different materials at different wall sections. The figure
below shows the different wall types used to make the outer envelops of the case building.
Figure 2.2.2-1: Different wall types on case building
Wall type 2, 3 and 4 are curtain walls with different type of glazing materials. Whereas wall
type 1, 6 and 7 are external walls with different cross sections.
The following figures show the different cross sections of the wall materials, partitions, floor,
roof, doors and windows used in the model and their thermal properties.
11
U= 0.139 Btu/hr- ft2-F
U= 0.442 Btu/hr- ft2-F
U= 0.659 Btu/hr- ft2-F
12
U= 0.258 Btu/hr- ft2-F
U= 0.148 Btu/hr- ft2-F
U= 0.068 Btu/hr- ft2-F
13
2.2.3 Zones and Occupancy
Floor Zone Area (Sq. Ft) Max. Occupancy No. People /sq.ft
I
Assembly lobby 1432 95 0.0663
Storage/Mech. 2727 9 0.0033
Labs/educational 2886 58 0.0201
Storage/Mech. 780 3 0.0038
Labs 2518 50 0.0199
Labs/educational 4178 83 0.0199
Circulation 4563 46 0.0101
II
Assembly 449 30 0.0668
Classrooms 982 49 0.0499
Kitchen 125 1 0.0080
Storage/Mech. 2956 10 0.0034
Circulation 3315 34 0.0103
Business area 1472 15 0.0102
III
Business area 1935 20 0.0103
Assembly 940 63 0.0670
Kitchen 123 1 0.0081
Assembly 335 22 0.0657
Circulation 1216 12 0.0099
Assembly 589 39 0.0662
Storage 250 1 0.0040
IV
Educational shops/ voc. Rooms 3298 66 0.0200
Business area 673 7 0.0104
Storage/Mech. 44 1 0.0227
Business area 979 10 0.0102
Circulation 1254 13 0.0104
VI
Storage 215 1 0.0047
Business area 2130 22 0.0103
Storage/Mech. 187 1 0.0053
Business area 998 10 0.0100
Circulation 1591 16 0.0101
Mechanical 241 1 0.0041
Business area 1005 10 0.0100
Table 2.2.3 Different Zones and Their Area in the Case Building
14
2.2.4 Internal Heat Sources
The internal heat sources like occupancy, lighting, computers and office equipment and
other sources have to be inputted in the building model to get reliable building performance
results. These sources vary with time as they are very much dependent on the occupancy
pattern of the different zones of building. The tables below show the occupancy schedule
and internal heat source schedule for the case building.
Floor 1
Hr. Foot traffic Percent Comp/light Percent
Occupancy #
people
Lighting
Btu/hr Equipments Btu/hr
Maximum Value 113 50154.32 10160
1 5 5 5 2507.72 508
2 5 5 5 2507.72 508
3 5 5 5 2507.72 508
4 5 5 5 2507.72 508
5 8 5 15 2507.72 508
6 15 5 17 2507.72 508
7 30 10 34 5015.43 1016
8 70 50 79 25077.16 5080
9 75 80 85 40123.45 8128
10 80 85 90 42631.17 8636
11 82 95 93 47646.60 9652
12 85 95 96 47646.60 9652
13 80 85 90 42631.17 8636
14 90 87 102 43634.26 8839
15 98 90 111 45138.88 9144
16 90 98 102 49151.23 9957
17 80 95 90 47646.60 9652
18 70 50 79 25077.16 5080
19 50 30 20 15046.29 3048
20 40 20 15 10030.86 2032
21 25 10 12 5015.43 1016
22 5 5 10 2507.72 508
23 5 5 5 2507.72 508
24 5 5 5 2507.72 508
15
Floor 2 Floor 3
Occupancy
Lighting
Btu/hr
Equipments
Btu/hr Occupancy
Lighting
Btu/hr
Equipments
Btu/hr
Max 120 87955.53 15240 158 80548.22 23368
1 6 4397.78 762 5 4027.41 1168.4
2 6 4397.78 762 5 4027.41 1168.4
3 6 4397.78 762 5 4027.41 1168.4
4 6 4397.78 762 20 4027.41 1168.4
5 9 4397.78 762 15 4027.41 1168.4
6 17 4397.78 762 24 4027.41 1168.4
7 34 8795.55 1524 47 8054.82 2336.8
8 79 43977.77 7620 111 40274.11 11684
9 85 70364.43 12192 119 64438.57 18694.4
10 90 74762.20 12954 126 68465.98 19862.8
11 93 83557.76 14478 130 76520.81 22199.6
12 96 83557.76 14478 134 76520.81 22199.6
13 90 74762.20 12954 126 68465.98 19862.8
14 102 76521.31 13258.8 142 70076.95 20330.16
15 111 79159.98 13716 155 72493.40 21031.2
16 102 86196.42 14935.2 142 78937.25 22900.64
17 90 83557.76 14478 126 76520.81 22199.6
18 79 43977.77 7620 111 40274.11 11684
19 57 26386.66 4572 79 24164.47 7010.4
20 45 17591.11 3048 20 16109.64 4673.6
21 28 8795.55 1524 10 8054.82 2336.8
22 6 4397.78 762 5 4027.41 1168.4
23 6 4397.78 762 5 4027.41 1168.4
24 6 4397.78 762 5 4027.41 1168.4
16
Hr.
Floor 4
Floor 5
Occupancy
Lighting
Btu/hr
Equipments
Btu/hr Occupancy
Lighting
Btu/hr
Equipments
Btu/hr
Max 97 100739.1 33528 61 94554.96 44704
1 5 5036.95 1676.4 3 4727.75 2235.2
2 5 5036.95 1676.4 3 4727.75 2235.2
3 5 5036.95 1676.4 3 4727.75 2235.2
4 5 5036.95 1676.4 3 4727.75 2235.2
5 8 5036.95 1676.4 5 4727.75 2235.2
6 15 5036.95 1676.4 9 4727.75 2235.2
7 29 10073.91 3352.8 18 9455.50 4470.4
8 68 50369.54 16764 43 47277.48 22352
9 73 80591.26 26822.4 46 75643.97 35763.2
10 78 85628.22 28498.8 49 80371.71 37998.4
11 80 95702.12 31851.6 50 89827.21 42468.8
12 82 95702.12 31851.6 52 89827.21 42468.8
13 78 85628.22 28498.8 49 80371.71 37998.4
14 87 87643.00 29169.36 55 82262.81 38892.48
15 95 90665.17 30175.2 60 85099.46 40233.6
16 87 98724.30 32857.44 55 92663.86 43809.92
17 78 95702.12 31851.6 49 89827.21 42468.8
18 68 50369.54 16764 43 47277.48 22352
19 49 30221.72 10058.4 31 28366.49 13411.2
20 39 20147.82 6705.6 24 18910.99 8940.8
21 24 10073.91 3352.8 15 9455.50 4470.4
22 5 5036.95 1676.4 3 4727.75 2235.2
23 5 5036.95 1676.4 3 4727.75 2235.2
24 5 5036.95 1676.4 3 4727.75 2235.2
Table 2.2.4 Floors Internal Heat Source and Occupancy Schedule
17
2.2.5 Set Point Temperatures
Floor Zone Heating Set point
Temperatures
Cooling set point
Temperatures
Heating (F) Heating set
back (F)
Cooling (F) Cooling set
back (F)
I
Assembly lobby 75 60 65 77
Storage/Mech. 73 58 66 78
Labs/educational 77 62 62 75
Storage/Mech. 73 58 66 78
Labs 77 62 62 75
Labs/educational 77 62 62 75
Circulation 70 55 68 80
II
Assembly 75 60 65 77
Classrooms 73 58 66 79
Kitchen 65 55 70 84
Storage/Mech. 73 58 66 78
Circulation 70 55 68 80
Business area 75 60 65 77
III
Business area 75 60 65 77
Assembly 75 60 65 77
Kitchen 65 55 70 84
Assembly 75 60 65 77
Circulation 70 55 68 80
Assembly 75 60 65 77
Storage 73 58 66 78
IV
Educational shops/ voc. Rooms 73 58 66 79
Business area 75 60 65 77
Storage/Mech. 73 58 66 78
Business area 75 60 65 77
Circulation 70 55 68 80
VI
Storage 73 58 66 78
Business area 75 60 65 77
Storage/Mech. 73 58 66 78
Business area 75 60 65 77
Circulation 70 55 68 80
Mechanical 73 58 66 78
Business area 75 60 65 77
Table 2.2.5 Zones Set Point Temperatures
18
2.3 HVAC System
2.3.1 HVAC System Overview
HVAC System of the Syracuse CoE Building makes use of Hydronic radiant cooling and
heating (HRC&H) systems. Using of HRC &H systems allow the separation of the tasks
of ventilation and thermal space conditioning.
While the primary air distribution is used to fulfill the ventilation requirements for a
high level of indoor air quality, the secondary water distribution system provides
thermal conditioning to the building. Most of the heating and cooling in rooms is
provided via ceiling panels that are embedded with copper piping that efficiently
carries warm or cool water.
HRC&H Systems significantly reduce the amount of air transported through buildings,
as the ventilation is provided by outside air systems without the re-circulating air
fraction.
Due to the physical properties of water, HRC&H Systems remove a given amount of
thermal energy and use less than 5% of the otherwise necessary fan energy. The
separation of tasks not only improves comfort conditions, but increases indoor air
quality and improves the control and zoning of the system as well.
Major Subsystems of the HVAC System:
Air(ventilation) system
Water System -- Heating system
Water System -- Cooling system
19
2.3.2 Air System
The air system is used for supplying fresh air requirement for the space based on ASHRAE
standards and to take hot air from the rooms. The air system has a very small role in
offsetting the cooling or heating load and is set to be supplied at a constant temperature of
72°F.
Figure 2.3.2-1: AHU-1 (Air Handling Unit-1)
There are two air handling units in the faculty,
1. AHU1- supports the air requirement of the whole building except the cubicles in the
TIEQ.
2. AHU2 -especially assigned to supply air to the TIEQ cubicles.
The drawing below is the Air System Riser Diagram for the whole building, New air is took
from the OA Intake Louver at north wall of MER., then the AHU-1 would treat the new air
then supply the fresh air directly to the whole building. The air supply mode for the building
is Under Floor Air Supply. Return air would be taken from the rooms, and the enthalpy wheel
in the AHU-1 would make heat exchange between the fresh air and the return air. But there
is no mix between return air and fresh air. Because the air system has a very small role in
offsetting the cooling or heating load, the air system just take the work of supplying fresh air
to the building.
20
Figure 2.3.2-2: Air System Riser Diagram (AHU-1)
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-301 for detail)
The drawing below is the TIEQ Air System Flow Diagram. The AHU-2 is just serving for the
TIEQ lab. The supply air mode is also Under Floor Air Supply. Except the fresh air send from
the AHU-2, each cubicle in the TIEQ lab equipped with its own ATM (Air Treatment Modules)
that enable each individual to control and adjust his own comfort condition.
Figure 2.3.2-3: TIEQ Air System Flow Diagram (AHU-2)
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-302 for detail)
AHU-1
AHU-2
21
ATM ( Air Treatment Modules)
1. The TIEQ lab is equipped with ATMs that enable each individual to control and adjust
his own comfort condition.
Figure 2.3.2-4: ATM (Air Treatment Modules)
AHU2 supply air to ATMs for further treatment according to individual preferences. In the ATM,
the return air will mix with the fresh air from the AHU-2. Then the mixed air would be sent to the
cubicle. People can adjust the temperature and humidity according to his own comfort condition.
One ATM only serves one cubicle.
Figure 2.3.2-5: Air Treatment Modulus (ATM) Air Flow Diagram
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-302 for detail)
ATM
22
Below is the AHU-2 Control System for TIEQ lab. You can see many dampers. Their job is
controlling the fresh air amount from the AHU and the air from ATMs which are controlled by
individuals for their specific comfort need. If the CO2 level in the cubicle over the set point,
the damper which controls the fresh air from AHU will open more to let more fresh air go
into the cubicle.
Figure 2.3.2-6: AHU-2 Control System for TIEQ lab
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-807 for detail)
Currently the set up of dampers closing and opening is based on
Time of the day
Day mode and night mode
Level of CO2
Depending on the level of CO2 ,which is a an indication of the number of
occupants ,the damper will automatically adjust to bring the level of CO2 to the
acceptable range.
23
Major components supporting Air System,
1. Supply and return fans
Supply and return fans are used to supply and
return fresh air to and from the facility.
Both fans have variable frequency drive to control
the mass flow rate.
2. Enthalpy wheel
used for heat and moisture
exchange.
3. Desiccant wheel
used when more dehumidification
is needed.
4. Pre heater
used to preheat the incoming air
during winter.
Uses hot water from the ground water loop as a heat source.
5. Cooling coil
Uses chilled water supply as a cooling media.
6. Heating coil
Uses hot water supply as a heating media.
7. Air outlets
Different diffusers and registers are used for supply, return and exhaust systems.
The registers are equipped with dampers to controls the flow of air in to the
room.
24
Below is the design data for the major components supporting Air System, refer to the
drawing M-004.
AIR HANDLING UNIT SCHEDULE
ITEM HOT WATER COIL
MAX
FACE
VEL
(FPM)
TOTAL
CAP
(MBH)
FLOW
RATE
(GPM)
WATER
PD
(FT)
ENT
DB
TEMP
(°F)
LVG
DB
TEMP
(°F)
ENT
WATER
TEMP
(°F)
LVG
WATER
TEMP
(°F)
AHU-1 475 266 53.2 6 52.3 72 130 120
AHU-2 475 84.9 17 6 32.7 72 130 120
AIR HANDLING UNIT SCHEDULE
ITEM COOLING COIL
MAX
FACE
VEL
(FPM)
TOTAL
CAP
(MBH)
SENS
CAP
(MBH)
FLOW
RATE
(GPM)
WATER
PD
(FT)
LVG
DB
TEMP
(°F)
LVG
AIR
WB
(°F)
ENT
DB
TEMP
(°F)
ENT
AIR
WB
(°F)
ENT
WATER
TEMP
(°F)
LVG
WATER
TEMP
(°F)
AHU-1 475 510.4 257.9 113.4 3.46 56.2 55.7 75.3 68.7 50 60
AHU-2 475 100 57.3 20 12 54.2 63.6 81.1 69.6 45 55
AIR HANDLING UNIT SCHEDULE
ITEM PRE-HEAT COIL
MAX
FACE
VEL
(FPM)
TOTAL
CAP
(MBH)
FLOW
RATE
(GPM)
WATER
PD
(FT)
ENT
DB
TEMP
(°F)
LVG
DB
TEMP
(°F)
ENT
WATER
TEMP
(°F)
LVG
WATER
TEMP
(°F)
AHU-1 500 254 103.0 5 -15 0 45 40
AHU-2
AIR HANDLING UNIT SCHEDULE
ITEM ENTHALPY WHEEL
WINTER SUMMER
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
AHU-1 0 -0.2 38.6 32.6 85.0 75.0 75.3 68.7
25
AHU-2 -15 -15 32.6 31.3 85.0 75.0 81.2 69.6
AIR HANDLING UNIT SCHEDULE
ITEM DESICCANT WHEEL
WINTER SUMMER
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
ENT
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
LVG
AIR
DB
(°F)
AHU-1 38.6 32.6 52.3 42.5 56.2 55.7 62.9 56
AHU-2 NOT APPLICABLE
AIR HANDLING UNIT SCHEDULE
ITEM SUPPLY FAN RETURN FAN
FLOW
RATE
(CFM)
EXTL
SP
(IN
WG)
MOTOR DATA MOTOR DATA
MAX
HP
VOLT PH HZ MAX
HP
VOLT PH HZ
AHU-1 14,840 1.5 25 460 3 60 12,844 1.5 20 460 3 60
AHU-2 2,315 1 3 460 3 60 2,315 1 1.5 460 3 60
26
2.3.3 Water System
Below is the Mechanical Plant Single Line Diagram. The hot water is supplied by the 7 heat
pumps and 2 boilers installed in the facility. The first stage of heating is provided by the
geothermal heat pumps and the second stage of heating is provided by boiler 1 and boiler 2.
Currently four heat pumps are dedicated for heating only but all of the heat pumps have a
reversing valve to change the mode of operation (heating and cooling mode).
Figure 2.3.3: Mechanical Plant Single Line Diagram
Heat pumps Heat Exchanger (HX-5)
Ground Loop Pumping Zone
Cooling Tower Pumping Zone
Boiler Heating Pumping Zone
27
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-303 for detail)
In Heating mode any cooling demand will use water directly from the geothermal loop or
cooling tower.
2.1.1.1 Heating System
The hot water system is used to offset the heating load during cold season through the
radiant panels. It is also used as a heat source for the coils in the AHUs, Fan coil units, finned
radiation units (FTR) and unit heaters and ATMs.
Figure 2.3.3.1-1: Mechanical Heating Single Line Diagram
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-305 for detail)
Below is the Radiant Ceiling/Floor water Single Line Diagram. Radiant Ceiling/Floor Panels
can offset the cooling or heating load. The control valves can regulate between the hot water
tubes and chilled water tubes. The Radiant Ceiling/Floor Panels take the main role in offset
the cooling and heating. But the air system is set just to supply fresh air at a constant
temperature of 72°F.
28
Figure 2.3.3.1-2: Radiant Ceiling/Floor water Single Line Diagram
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-306 for detail)
The control logic for the heating system is based on,
1. Time of the day
During nights only the boilers are set to operate
2. Load on the building
Depending on the load 1 2 3 or 4 heat pumps work at a time
Besides there are control valves that regulate the flow of hot water to each room depending
on the heating load.
Components of the hot water system,
1. Boiler
for heating water to the required temperature
2. Heat pump
for heating water to the required temperature
3. Liquid to liquid heat exchanger
4. Air separators
used for separating air from going to the pumps
5. Chemical pot feeder
used for treating the water to prevent corrosion in the system
6. Hot water pump
29
Used to circulate hot water in the system
7. Radiant panels
8. Finned tube radiation(FTR)
9. Fan coil unit(FCU)
10. Unit heater(UH)
11. ATM
Used to condition the air based on the occupant preference
12. Duplex basket strainer
used for filtering the water before it goes to the pump
Below are tables of Mechanical Schedule of the Components of the hot water system.
HOT WATER BOILER SCHEDULE
ITEM CAPACITY FUEL
TYPE
FLOW
RATE
GPM
WATER
TEMPERATURE
(°F)
ELECTRICAL DATA
INPUT
(MBH)
OUTPUT
(MBH)
ENT LVG AMPS VOLT PHASE HZ
B-1 500 440 NATURAL
GAS
22 120 160 4 115 1 60
B-2 500 270 NATURAL
GAS
13.5 120 160 4 115 1 60
HEAT EXCHANGER PACKAGE
ITEM SOURCE LOAD
FLOW
RATE
(GPM)
WATER TEMP MAX
PRESS
DROP
(PSIG)
FLOW
RATE
(GPM)
WATER TEMP MAX
PRESS
DROP
(PSIG)
ENT
(°F)
LVG
(°F)
ENT
(°F)
LVG
(°F)
HX-1 46.0 50 60 0.5 115.0 66 62 2.6
HX-2 5.1 50 60 0.1 10.2 60 55 0.3
HX-3 6.8 160 120 0.5 3.4 40 120 0.1
30
HX-4 2.5 160 120 0.4 1.3 40 120 0.1
HX-5 217.0 40 45 2.3 217.0 60 50 0.6
31
Table 2.3.3.1: Mechanical Schedule of the Components of the hot water system
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-004 for detail)
32
2.1.1.2 Cooling System
The cooling system is responsible for offsetting the cooling load of the building. Cooling is
achieved through the use of chilled water.
Major components using chilled water,
2 Radiant panels
3 Cooling coils of AHU1 and AHU2 and ATMs
4 Separate fan cooling units(FCU) in each level of the building
33
Figure 2.3.3.2: Mechanical Cooling Single Line Diagram
(Refer to the SyracuseCoE drawing M-304 for detail)
Chilled water generation:
Chilled water is generated in the facility through the geothermal heat pumps and also
through heat exchange with cold water from the ground loop.
towers are used for heat rejection from the heat pump.( condenser side heat rejection).
Currently there are three heat pumps which are dedicated to generate cold water needed to
exchange heat
Ground loop or cooling with the chilled water system.
Components supporting Chilled water system,
1. Water to water heat exchangers
2. Chilled water pumps
3. Cold water pumps
4. Ground water pumps
5. Cooling tower
6. Automatically regulated valves
7. Air separators
8. Chemical pot feeder
HEAT EXCHANGER PACKAGE
ITEM SOURCE LOAD
FLOW
RATE
(GPM)
WATER TEMP MAX
PRESS
DROP
(PSIG)
FLOW
RATE
(GPM)
WATER TEMP MAX
PRESS
DROP
(PSIG)
ENT
(°F)
LVG
(°F)
ENT
(°F)
LVG
(°F)
HX-1 46.0 50 60 0.5 115.0 66 62 2.6
HX-2 5.1 50 60 0.1 10.2 60 55 0.3
HX-3 6.8 160 120 0.5 3.4 40 120 0.1
HX-4 2.5 160 120 0.4 1.3 40 120 0.1
HX-5 217.0 40 45 2.3 217.0 60 50 0.6
COOLING TOWER SCHEDULE
ITEM TYPE GPM CAPACITY
(TONS)
ANTIFREEZE COIL
PRESSUR
E DROP
(FT)
WATER
TEMP
WEB
BULB
TEMP
(DEG
F)
AIR
FLOW
(CFM)
34
CT-1 CLOSED
CIRCUIT
300 125 DYNALENE
HC-20
8.9 95 85 75 59,550
35
3. Modeling and Simulation with BCVTB and Energy+
3.1 Introduction We need to analyse the energy and control system of COE building. As we all know, Energy+
is good at energy simulation and Dymola is good at control simulation, so we use those two
tools to analyse the simulation. The energy and control simulation are coupled, however,
Energy+ and Dymola cannot directly connect with each other, so we plan to use Building
Controls Virtual Test Bed (BCVTB) to connect Energy+ and Dymola.
3.2 BCVTB Platform
3.2.1 Structure and Functionality
BCVTB is a software environment that allows expert users to couple different simulation
programs for co-simulation. For example, the BCVTB allows the simulation of a building and
HVAC system in EnergyPlus and the control logic in Modelica or in MATLAB/Simulink, while
exchanging data between the software as they simulate. A system model for such a coupled
simulation is shown in Figure 3.2.1.1.
Figure 3.2.1.1: System model that links EnergyPlus with Simulink
The BCVTB is based on the Ptolemy II software environment that has been developed by the
University of California at Berkeley. The BCVTB is aimed at expert users of simulation that hit
limitations of existing simulation programs.
Programs that are currently linked to the BCVTB are
• EnergyPlus
• Dymola, which is a Modelica modeling and simulation environment,Building Controls
Virtual Test Bed
• Radiance
36
• MATLAB
• Simulink
• the BACnet stack
3.2.2 Interface with Energy+
Figure 3.2.2.1 shows the architecture of the connection between EnergyPlus and Ptolemy II.
Ptolemy II connects to the external interface in EnergyPlus. In the external interface, the
input/output signals that are exchanged between Ptolemy II and EnergyPlus are mapped to
EnergyPlus objects. The subject of this section is to show how to configure this mapping and
how to use these objects.
Figure 3.2.2.1: Architecture of the BCVTB with the EnergyPlus client (black) and other clients (grey)
The external interface can map to three EnergyPlus input objects called “ExternalInterface:
Schedule”, “ExternalInterface: Actuator” and “ExternalInterface: Variable”. The
“ExternalInterface: Schedule” can be used to overwrite schedules. The other two objects can
be used in place of Energy ManagementmSystem (EMS) actuators and EMS variables. The
objects have similar functionality as the objects “Schedule:Compact”,
“EnergyManagementSystem:Actuator” and
“EnergyManagementSystem:GlobalVariable” ,except that their numerical value is obtained
from the external interface at the beginning of each EnergyPlus zone time step, and will
remain constant during this zone time step.
This element will contain child elements that define the variable mapping. In between the
element tags, a user needs to specify how the exchanged data is mapped to EnergyPlus
objects. Hence, the order of these elements matter, and it need to be the same as the order
of the elements in the input and output signal vector of Ptolemy II actor that calls EnergyPlus.
The exchanged variables are declared in elements that are called “variable” and have an
attribute “source.” As described above, the external interface can send data to
ExternalInterface:Schedule, ExternalInterface:Actuator, and ExternalInterface:Variable. For
these objects, the source attribute needs to be set to Ptolemy, because they are sent by
37
Ptolemy II. The xml elements for these objects are defined as follows:
1) For ExternalInterface:Schedule, use
<variable source="Ptolemy">
<EnergyPlus schedule="NAME"/>
</variable>
where NAME needs to be the EnergyPlus schedule name.
2) For ExternalInterface:Actuator, use
<variable source="Ptolemy">
<EnergyPlus actuator="NAME" />
</variable>
where NAME needs to be the EnergyPlus actuator name.
3) For ExternalInterface:Variable, use
<variable source="Ptolemy">
<EnergyPlus variable="NAME"/>
</variable>
where NAME needs to be the EnergyPlus Energy Runtime Language (Erl) variable name.
The external interface can also read data from any Output:Variable and
EnergyManagementSystem:OutputVariable. For these objects, set the "source" attribute to
"EnergyPlus," because they are computed by EnergyPlus.
In order to connect Energy+ and Dymola, we also need to syntax of an xml file that
configures the data mapping between EnergyPlus and the externalinterface.The data
mapping between EnergyPlus and the external interface is defined in an xml file called
variables.cfg. This file needs to be in the same directory as the EnergyPlus idf file. The file has
the following header:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE BCVTB-variables SYSTEM "variables.dtd">
Following the header is an element of the form
<BCVTB-variables>
</BCVTB-variables>
3.2.3 Interface with Dymola To create a new Modelica model, proceed as follows: First, open Dymola and the Buildings library,
which may be downloaded from http://simulationresearch.lbl.gov/modelica . From the Buildings
library, add the block Buildings.Utilities.IO.BCVTB.BCVTB to your model. Next, connect the bcvtb block
to your other Modelica models to create a system model that takes signals from the bcvtb block and
writes signals to the bcvtb block. This may yield a system model as shown in Figure 3.2.3.1
38
Figure 3.2.3.1: Graphical view of the dymola model exchanging data with BCVTB.
To configure the bcvtb interface, double-click on the bcvtb block that is shown in the left of the
figure. This will open the input form shown in Figure 3.2.3.2.
Figure 3.2.3.2: Configuration of the bcvtb block in the Modelica Buildings library
In the above setting example, a vector with two double values are obtained from the BCVTB and
written to the BCVTB every 60 seconds of simulation time. Additional information about this
block can be obtained by pressing the Info button.
39
3.3 Energy+ Model for COE Enclosure
3.3.1 Create an EnergyPlus idf file for COE enclosure
We build a code simulation model in DesignBuilder. The figure is shown in Figure 3.3.1
Figure 3.3.1 The enclosure of COE building inDesign Builder.
And then we export the building into IDF file. Finnally, we can have the Energy+ Model for COE
Enclosure.
Figure 3.3.2 IDF file of COE Building from Design Builder
4.3.2 Add the exchanged schedule and variable with BCVTB
To enter schedules to which the external interface writes , we should add the following code in
the IDF file, which is created in 4.3.1 part.
ExternalInterface, PtolemyServer
TSetCoo,
40
Temperature,
24;
ExternalInterface:Schedule,
TSetHea,
Temperature,
20;
The function of each line is in the below table.
ExternalInterface,
keywords in IDF, Object to activate the external
interface
PtolemyServer; Name of external interface
ExternalInterface:Schedule, keywords in IDF
TSetCoo, Name
Temperature, ScheduleType
24; Initial Value, used during warm-up
!Heating schedule. This schedule is set directly by the external interface. During warm-up
and system-sizing, it is fixed at 20 degC.
ExternalInterface:Schedule, keywords in IDF
TSetHea, Name
Temperature, ScheduleType
20; Initial Value, used during warm-up
! Heating schedule. This schedule is set directly by the external interface.During warm-up
and system-sizing, it is fixed at 20 degC.
ExternalInterface:Schedule, keywords in IDF
TSetHea, Name
Temperature, ScheduleType
20; Initial Value, used during warm-up
3.4 Modelica Model for HVAC system We can build a modelica model in Dymola (we will introduce the method in the next chart).
41
3.5 Whole Building Model using BCVTB to couple Enclosure and HVAC system
3.5.1 Create a configuration file for Energy+ IDF file
Note that we have not yet specified the order of the elements in the signal vector that is
exchanged between EnergyPlus and Ptolemy II. This information is specified in the file
variables.cfg. The file variables.cfg needs to be in the same directory as the EnergyPlus idf file. For
the objects used in the section above, the file looks like
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE BCVTB-variables SYSTEM "variables.dtd">
<BCVTB-variables>
<!-- The next two elements send the set points to E+ -->
<variable source="Ptolemy">Building Controls Virtual Test Bed
<EnergyPlus schedule="TSetHea"/>
</variable>
<variable source="Ptolemy">
<EnergyPlus schedule="TSetCoo"/>
</variable>
<!-- The next two elements receive the outdoor and the zone air temperature from E+ -->
<variable source="EnergyPlus">
<EnergyPlus name="ENVIRONMENT" type="OUTDOOR DRY BULB"/>
</variable>
<variable source="EnergyPlus">
<EnergyPlus name="ZSF1" type="ZONE/SYS AIR TEMPERATURE"/>
</variable>
<!-- The next two elements receive the schedule value as an output from E+ -->
<variable source="EnergyPlus">
<EnergyPlus name="TSetHea" type="Schedule Value"/>
42
</variable>
<variable source="EnergyPlus">
<EnergyPlus name="TSetCoo" type="Schedule Value"/>
</variable>
</BCVTB-variables>
This file specifies that the actor that calls EnergyPlus has an input vector with two elements that
are computed by Ptolemy II and sent to EnergyPlus, and that it has an output vector with four
elements that are computed by EnergyPlus and sent to Ptolemy II. The order of the elements in
each vector is determined by the order in the above XML file.
Hence, the input vector that contains the signals sent to EnergyPlus has elements “TsetHea” and
“TsetCoo”. The output vector that contains values computed by EnergyPlus has elements
“Environment” (Outdoor drybulb temperature), “ZSF1” (ZONE/SYS AIR TEMPERATURE), “TSetHea
“(Schedule Value), and “TsetCoo” (Schedule Value).
3.5.1 Create a BCVTB model to integrate Energy+ and Dymola
Create a model in BCVTB as figure 3.5.1.1
Figure 3.5.1.1 BCVTB model that links a model of a Energy+ with the Dymola modeling
43
4. MODELING AND SIMULATION USNG MODELICA
4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 Features of Modelica
Modelica primarily is a modeling language, sometimes called hardware description
language, that allows to specify mathematical models of complex physical systems, e.g.
for the purpose of computer simulation of dynamic systems where behavior evolves as a
function of time. Modelica is also an object-oriented equation based programming
language, oriented towards computational applications with high complexity requiring
high performance.
The four most important features of Modelica are:
Modelica is based on equations instead of assignment statements. This permits
acausal modeling that gives better reuse of classes since equations do not specify a
certain data flow direction. Thus a Modelica class can adapt to more than one data
flow context. Modelica has multi-domain modeling capability, meaning that model components
corresponding to physical objects from several different domains such as e.g.
electrical, mechanical, thermodynamic, hydraulic, and biological and control
applications can be described and connected.
Modelica is an object-oriented language with a general class concept that unifies
classes, generics —known as templates in C++, and general subtyping into a single
language construct. This facilitates reuse of components and evolution of models.
Modelica has a strong software component model, with constructs for creating
and connecting components. Thus the language is ideally suited as an architectural
description language for complex physical systems, and to some extent for software
systems.
4.1.2 Objective and Scope
As mentioned in the introduction of this paper Energy Plus, which is one of the most
developed and matured energy simulation tool available, lacks the following basic features
from simulation point of view
1- Energy plus is a text based simulation tool which is very difficult and takes lots of
time for system definition.
2- The control strategy developed in Energy plus is very simplified type and there is no
way of checking the effect of implementing modern control strategy in a building
system.
3- The users of Energy plus are restricted to use only the models available and no way
to incorporate a new model
To circumvent those problems we are planning to use Modelica for the fact that
2- It is an object oriented language which is easy for system definition
44
3- Most of the Common HVAC systems are already developed and are ready to use
which in this case is just dragging and dropping unlike that of Energy plus which
needs lots of node generation and definition
4- New components and systems which are not available can be developed by the user.
Thus the objective of this paper is to study the thermal behavior of a building through
simulation by making use of the good feature of both simulation tools, Energy Plus and
Modelica, by bridging them through the use of BCVTB
4.2 Case Study : Heat Transfer Lab
4.2.1 Description of the facility
The heat transfer lab of Mechanical and Aerospace lab is used as a case study for the HVAC
system simulation. The facility contains all the basic components needed for full air conditioning.
The following are list of components comprising the whole system
Figure 4.2.1.1 Heat transfer Lab
a-Water cooled heat pump- this heat pump is responsible for cooling down the moist air and for
pumping air to the whole system. And it has a continues supply of cold water as a cooling media
for the condenser.
b-Electric heater
a duct mounted electric heater with a capacity of 5kw is for heating the moist air to the required
temperature level. Its operation is controlled by a PID controller which is acting as a switch to
turn on and off depending on the system requirement.
c-Electric humidifier
The last air conditioning component in the system before supplying the moist air to the room in
the facility is the electric humidifier. It has a duct mounted steam outlet which is used for
injecting steam to the moist air. A PID controller is used to control the function of the humidifier
depending on the relative humidity set point of the room.
45
d- insulated duct
A duct is used as a means of transporting the treated moist air to the room. The surface of the
duct is insulated to minimize interaction of heat with the surrounding which otherwise would
increase the load on the air conditioning system.
e- test room
The Test Room has supply diffusers, one in the roof and one in the floor. During the
experiment it is optional to use either of the two supply diffusers or both at the same
time depending on the objective of the experiment. A manual damper is installed for
switching the flow to the roof or floor.
Three sides of the test room are covered with ¼” polycarbonate sheet and the fourth
side is equipped with a wall divided into three test panels. Two of the panels are made
of plywood while the third one is made of gypsum board, fiber glass insulation and
plywood.
Inside the room there is a manikin which is designed to mimic an occupant which can generate
heat. Beside there are two fluorescent lumps which contribute to the total cooling load.
4.2.2 Model assumptions and representation.
We have used Modelica for modeling the components and see the energy consumption of the
system. For the modeling we used the available models in the library of Modelica and Buildings
library developed by the Lawrence Berkley national laboratory. Below are the different
assumptions used for modeling the different components of the system.
a- Water cooled heat pump.
The water cooled pump used in the facility gives a constant cooling and there is no control device
for switching on and off. Thus at steady state it is acting as a simple heat exchanger with a
constant cooling duty. We have found experimentally that the unit gives a temperature of 8oC for
an inlet temperature of 23 oC at a flow rate of 480cfm. Besides the fan in the heat pump is a
constant speed fan and it always give a flow rate of 460 to 480cfm irrespective of the load. So to
make the simulation model simple we represent the water cooled pump by a combination of a
fan and a heat exchanger which is acting as a cooling coil.
b- Electric heater
The electric heater is providing a heating effect for the moist air passing over and besides the
main switch there is a PID controller which switch on and off the heater depending on the set
point. The PId controller has two input, the set point temperature and the temperature of the
room and it acts based on the difference in value between the two. At nominal condition the
heater has a power output of 5kw. We have picked a component from the buildings library that
mimics the actual operation of the heater which is a heater with a nominal power output similar
to the capacity of the actual heater with an input signal coming from the PID controller which
regulates the power outage from the power supply depending on the system requirement.
46
c- Electric humidifier
The humidifier section of the system is responsible for maintaining the required relative humidity
of the system. The actual humidifier is similar to a boiler with the steam generated ejected to the
moist air system. Since the objective is just to see how the air property would be affected
through introduction of a humidifier, we represent the humidifier as a simple heat exchanger
with mass interaction. Because of the simplicity of the model we didn’t consider the effect of
steam temperature on the temperature of the moist air and we only consider the effect of the
humidifier on the moisture content of the air.
d- Insulated duct
The duct in the actual system has an effect both on the pressure and temperature of the system.
In our simplified model we assume the duct to be adiabatic so that there would be no energy
interaction with the surrounding air. We account the pressure loss of 200pa to account for its
resistance so that it would be incorporated in the power requirement of the fan.
e- Test room
The test room is made of walls with ¼” polycarbonate glass in the three sides and with ply wood
on the remaining side. The model available in the building for a room model is very much
simplified and it doesn’t take the effect of moist air for the room and it is designed for a case of
ideal air to show the effect of different loads in the room temperature. Since our model is for a
medium of moist air instead of ideal air we were not able to use it due to its incompatibility. So to
represent the actual thermodynamics of the room we make use of energy plus for modeling the
room and use BCVTB to interface it with the other components modeled in modelica.
Figure 4.2.2.1 Definition of the Model using Dymola.
47
4.2.3 Communication logic between Energy plus and Dymola
An energy plus model for the room is developed with no AC system. Thus the room
temperature in the room will keep on increasing with the influence of loads incoming to the
room. In practice the air conditioning system is responsible for taking off the heat added to
the room by supplying an air with a lower temperature in such a way that the desired room
temperature and relative humidity will be maintained. The load in the room can be
categorized to sensible load and latent load and in other terms the air conditioning system
should send equal and opposite amount of those loads so that the room condition will be
maintained. In the simulation model those to forms of heat loads (sensible and Latent) are
supplied by the HVAC system developed in the Dymola platform. And to calculate the values
of sensible and latent load Dymola need outdoor condition and desired indoor conditions as
an input.
Since the facility is inside a conditioned room the outdoor conditions are assumed to be 23oC
and 30% relative humidity. These two values are obtained through experimental
measurement. The desired indoor conditions are obtained through simulation of the room
with energyPlus making use of the existing loads in the system. These values will be sent to
dymola through BCVTB as a communication bridge.
On the other hand Energy plus make use of the computed values of the sensible and latent
loads for the next time step computation of indoor air conditions and it gets those values
through BCVTB.
Thus for “to and from” kind of communication BCVTB requires a variable configuration file
called .cfg that describes which values are to be read from Energy plus and which values
from Dymola. The cfg. File used for the communication is shown in figure 3.2.2.2
Figure 4.2.2.2 Variables defined for communication between Dymola and EnergyPlus.
48
5. Results and Discussion
5.1 Simulatoin Having built the energy+ IDF file, Dymola model and BCVTB connector, we can do the whole
simulation right now, as shown in Figure 5.1.
Figure 5.1: whole simulation configuration of the Energy+ Simulator actor and Dymola.
5.2 Results As can be seen from figure 5.2the model tries to maintain the set temperature of 20oC by
varying the supply temperature based on the load available in the test room. As can be seen
there is a big variation in the supply temperature because of the fact that there is load
variation throughout the day. The result shows a higher supply air temperature during night
where there is no sunlight and lower supply temperature when there is sunlight. Even if we
are simulating an indoor condition we were not able to neglect the effect of environmental
condition for computation of indoor air condition since Energy plus uses weather data for
the computation. One thing that can be done is to edit the TMY3 weather data neglecting
the solar radiation and making the outdoor condition to be the same as 23 oC. But this takes
a lot of time to edit and we didn’t consider this option.
Figure 5.2 Indoor temperature and supply temperature profile for two day simulation.
49
Figure 5.3Indoor relative humidity.
Besides the temperature the relative humidity of the room is maintained to the set point of
40%. The PID controllers were responsible for maintaining 20oC and 40% relative humidity
by sending the right signals to the heater and the humidifier respectively. The time variation
of the signals from the two pid controllers is indicated in figure 4.2.3
Figure 5.4 Signals from PID controllers for heater and humidifier
As can be seen from the figure above, the humidifier has been working around 40% of its
capacity for most of the time and the heater uses a maximum of around 37% of its nominal
capacity of 5KW. And from this we can conclude that the humidifier and heater are oversized
for the system.
As discussed in the previous section the HAVC system in the dymola provide a moist air to
the room with specific temperature and relative humidity at each time step in such a way
50
that the resulting sensible heat and latent heat from the supply moist air will offset the
available sensible and latent load in the room so that a constant room temperature and
relative humidity will be maintained. The time variation of the latent heat and sensible heat
computed by dymola as an input to Energy Plus is shown in figure 3.2.4.
Figure 5.5 Sensible heat and latent heat computed by Dymola
As can be seen we have to send more sensible heat to the system during day time compared
to night time to offset the load due to solar radiation and hot outdoor condition.
51
6. Conclusion
During the course of this research we have seen the different features of energy plus and
modelica. We were able to integrate energy plus with modelica making use of Modelica as a
bridge for communication. The integration of the two simulation tools provide us a way to
use better features of both tools for a better understanding of interaction of HVAC system
and building.
During the modeling we found the debugging part of modelica to be far more complex than
we thought it would be. With the time limitation we had we were forced to use the available
component models in the library. Besides some of the components we wanted for the
simulation like water cooled heat pumps are not available and we were forced to use
simplified models available. Actually one can also develop a model using modelica and we
found it to be not that straight forward especially for a moist air since it is a mixture of water
and air.
Other than the above mentioned drawbacks, we found modeling using modelica to be very
much straightforward and very easy to see the system structure. Since it is graphic based
simulation environment it takes very less time to define a model compared to energy plus
which needs text based node definition for connection each component in the system.
Another interesting feature about modelica is that it has different algorithms for control
system which makes it very suitable for designing and simulation of control system. As
mentioned in the introduction section Energy plus lucks modern control strategy and use of
energy plus together with Dymola can improve the performance of Energy plus.
It is found that BCVTB is very friendly to use and the procedures to follow are very easy to
catch. One can use BCVTB as a tool for communicating Energyplus and Dymola as well as a
tool to display some of the required outputs both from Modelica and EnergyPlus.