indian political economy_naim

2
The Indian Political Economy_ Naim Keruwala THE INDIAN POLITICAl ECONOMY Until the early 1990s, the Political Economy of India was in a sorry state of affairs. Till the end of 1980s, Poli ti cal Economy of Indi a  was protec ted and str ict ly regula ted economy, both internally and externally. The wars with Pakistan, increased tensions with Chi na, communal, li ngu is ti c or cast e vi ol ence, Naxal it e upri si ngs, secessionist movements in Kashmir, the Northeast, and Punjab created a crisis of governability in India. The dramatic and pragmatic shift in reforms started taking place from the 1991s onwards. The crises during that period initiated a process of economic reforms and structural adj ustment. It was ma rked with speedy reforms and it s subs equen t successf ul implementation. The Government took measures which were more rational than their  pr evious ones. Its paradi gm shif t fr om st rong gover nment holdings to market liberalization marks the Revival of Indian Economy. India started its reforms very late, thirteen years after China changed had its course. Even when the change took place, the shift took very long and was not as sharp a turnaround as it was in China in 1978 or the Soviet Union after the mid-1980s. The Change in India was fr om one ki nd of soci et al consensus (s uch as the Nehr uvi an consensus) to a new consensus (say around reforms) and had to be a process and not an event, which had its own dyn ami c, ver y dif fer ent fro m tha t ope rat ing in a non- democr ati c or tot ali tar ian society. The 1991 reforms showed a lot of positive aspects. The growth rate of India’s GDP which had fallen to a paltry 0.8 per cent in the crisis year of 1991-92 recovered very quickly to 5.3 per cent by 1992-93 and further rose to 6.2 per cent in 1993-94 despite the major disturbances in 1992-93 triggered by the destruction of Babri Masjid. Despite the crisis and necessary structural adjustment, the Eight Five Year Plan (1992-97) averaged a growth rat of nearly 7 per cent. The Industrial production which showed a dismal, less than 1 per cent growth rate in 1991-92 rose to 12.8 per cent by the end of Eight five year  plan. The Capital Goods sector also showed a growth rate of 25 per cent from a negative growth in 1991-92. The Centr al Government ’s fiscal deficit was reduced to 2.9 per cent from 8.3 per cent, in just 3 years of the reforms. It is constantly proclaimed that poverty in India is declining, and a great industry has sprung up of academic treatises to show how fast poverty is declining. However, these treatises have reduced poverty by defining the term so that it no longer relates to whether or not people get their minimum requirements of calories. The official National Sample Survey of 2000 revealed that three-fourths of India's rural population and half the urban  pop ula ti on did not get the min imum rec ommended cal ories. This is confir med by nut rit ional and hea lth sur vey s, whi ch reveal tha t more tha n two-f ift hs of the adul t  population suffer from chronic energy deficiency, and a large percentage are at the border of this condition; half India's women are anemic; half its children can be clinically defined as malnourished (stunted, wasting, or both). - 1056 words Page 1 of 2

Upload: naimkeruwala

Post on 08-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

8/6/2019 Indian Political Economy_Naim

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-political-economynaim 1/2

The Indian Political Economy_ Naim Keruwala

THE INDIAN POLITICAl ECONOMY

Until the early 1990s, the Political Economy of India was in a sorry state of affairs. Tillthe end of 1980s, Political Economy of India  was protected and strictly regulated

economy, both internally and externally. The wars with Pakistan, increased tensions with

China, communal, linguistic or caste violence, Naxalite uprisings, secessionistmovements in Kashmir, the Northeast, and Punjab created a crisis of governability in

India.

The dramatic and pragmatic shift in reforms started taking place from the 1991s onwards.

The crises during that period initiated a process of economic reforms and structuraladjustment. It was marked with speedy reforms and its subsequent successful

implementation. The Government took measures which were more rational than their 

  previous ones. Its paradigm shift from strong government holdings to marketliberalization marks the Revival of Indian Economy.

India started its reforms very late, thirteen years after China changed had its course. Evenwhen the change took place, the shift took very long and was not as sharp a turnaround as

it was in China in 1978 or the Soviet Union after the mid-1980s. The Change in India was

from one kind of societal consensus (such as the Nehruvian consensus) to a new

consensus (say around reforms) and had to be a process and not an event, which had itsown dynamic, very different from that operating in a non-democratic or totalitarian

society.

The 1991 reforms showed a lot of positive aspects. The growth rate of India’s GDP

which had fallen to a paltry 0.8 per cent in the crisis year of 1991-92 recovered very

quickly to 5.3 per cent by 1992-93 and further rose to 6.2 per cent in 1993-94 despite the

major disturbances in 1992-93 triggered by the destruction of Babri Masjid. Despite thecrisis and necessary structural adjustment, the Eight Five Year Plan (1992-97) averaged a

growth rat of nearly 7 per cent. The Industrial production which showed a dismal, less

than 1 per cent growth rate in 1991-92 rose to 12.8 per cent by the end of Eight five year  plan. The Capital Goods sector also showed a growth rate of 25 per cent from a negative

growth in 1991-92. The Central Government’s fiscal deficit was reduced to 2.9 per cent

from 8.3 per cent, in just 3 years of the reforms.

It is constantly proclaimed that poverty in India is declining, and a great industry has

sprung up of academic treatises to show how fast poverty is declining. However, thesetreatises have reduced poverty by defining the term so that it no longer relates to whether 

or not people get their minimum requirements of calories. The official National SampleSurvey of 2000 revealed that three-fourths of India's rural population and half the urban  population did not get the minimum recommended calories. This is confirmed by

nutritional and health surveys, which reveal that more than two-fifths of the adult

 population suffer from chronic energy deficiency, and a large percentage are at the border 

of this condition; half India's women are anemic; half its children can be clinicallydefined as malnourished (stunted, wasting, or both).

- 1056 words Page 1 of 2

8/6/2019 Indian Political Economy_Naim

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/indian-political-economynaim 2/2

The Indian Political Economy_ Naim Keruwala

One sector of the country's economy has seen breakneck growth in the past decade: the

 provision of software services and business process outsourcing services to foreign(principally US & UK) firms. However, that sector accounts for 0.25 per cent of the labor 

force. Where are the rest? Nearly half of India's total working-age population (15-59

years of age) is unemployed, most of it not even counted as part of the labor force. While

agriculture continues to employ the majority of those considered employed, it accountsfor less than a quarter of the national income, and that share continues to shrink.

The Industrial growth rate was mounting high after the 1991 reforms, but the agriculture

and allied sectors showed negative growth-rate. In 2002-03, the growth rate of agriculture

and allied sectors was only 3.8 per cent which further declined to 2.3 per cent in 2006-07.These figures are a disaster for a country like India where more than half of its population

is completely dependent on agriculture and allied sectors.

Poverty remains to be the biggest challenge for India and one of the main reasons for it isthe sluggish growth in agricultural and allied sectors. This has serious implications for the

 poor as about 55 per cent of the total work-force in India is still engaged in agricultureand Employment in agriculture is facing a near collapse. The absolute number of poor inIndia is intolerably large, about 300 million (as estimated in 2004-05). This makes the

size of the poor population nearly as large as what the size of the total Indian population

was at independence.

Wide prevalence of poverty, inequality and social justice and the poor quality of life of 

the vast majority of the people are the major areas of darkness in India’s social and

economic development. The Indian people enter the twenty-first century with a low per capita income, an intolerable level of illiteracy and a lowly position on the world index

on human resource development, despite commendable achievements in terms of 

economic growth and political democracy. A change in the social and economiccondition of the people has occurred since independence but at too slow a rate.

Today, India does no face the challenge of economic growth but the challenge of effective governance that would harness this growth, create institutions and structures

that would make this growth sustainable and inclusive.

India is not a great nation but it has the potential to be one, and it’s the responsibility of 

its citizen to embrace the diversity of its nation, forget the differences and work towards

achieving the common goal of development of India and its people. There is a need for 

the Civil societies to help in effective implementation of the programs such as NREGA

and RTI. There is a need that the benefits reach to the most needy through ‘self selection’without dividing the poor into caste and other categories, as is repeatedly done, not so

much to reach benefits to the most needy, but to seek short-term political dividends oncommunal or caste basis.

To conclude, If India has the will, and is able to realize even half of its potential in the next 20 or 25

 years, poverty would become a distant memory

- 1056 words Page 2 of 2