indicative ballast water analysis testing for port state
TRANSCRIPT
Okko Outinen
Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)
The Tenth Meeting of the Joint HELCOM/OSPAR Task Group on Ballast Water Management Exemptions (TG BALLAST 10-2019), Tallinn, Estonia,
17-18 December 2019
Indicative ballast water analysis testing for port State control
purposes
2017
• Onboard BW sampling
• Test different indicative analysis devices and recommend the most suitable method for PSC compliance monitoring purposes
• Provide input for IMOs BW Experience-building phase, designed to monitor the implementation of the BWMC
2018 - 2019
Co-operation with TRAFICOM
Materials and methods
M/S Polaris (Arctia Shipping, 2019). Mirva VG (VG-Shipping, 2019).
• M/S Polaris• Filtration and Ultraviolet (UV)
radiation BWTS• Ballast water was treated on the dock
• Mirva VG• Filtration, Electro-Catalysis and
ultrasound treatment (EUT) BWTS• Ballast water was treated 72 hours
before sampling in Sillamäe, Estonia.
Sampling point at M/S Polaris (above) and Mirva VG (below).
Water flow meter, hose and 50µm plankton net at M/S Polaris.
Viability assessments
• Indicative analysis methods:
1. Adenosine TriPhosphate (ATP) Ballast
water monitoring kit
2. Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM)
fluorometry
3. Single Turnover Active Fluorometry
(STAF)
ATP Ballast water monitoring kit.
4. Motility and Fluorescence Assay (MFA)
• Detailed analysis for the 10-50µm organisms using Fluorescein diacetate
(FDA) staining and epifluorescent microscope
MFA >50µm analysis (left) and the device and external computer (right).
10-50µm analysis results
Viability assessments (10-50µm) for the UV-treated samples. Viability assessments (10-50µm) for the untreated (UT) samples.
• M/S Polaris
• All analyses indicated non-compliance• All analyses indicated non-compliance, except ATP
Detailed MFAPAMSTAFMFA PAM STAF
Viability assessments (10-50µm) for the EUT-treated samples.
• Mirva VG = All
analyses indicated
compliance, except
STAF.
ATP analysis results (10-50µm).
• UT = Untreated
sample
Detailed STAF MFA PAM
• All devices were considered portable and reasonably priced.
• ATP – Analysis time and accuracy: How much cATP is per viable organism?
• STAF – Filtration step most likely needed
• MFA – Promising device in the development stages.
• PAM – Viable organism counts correlated relatively well with detailedanalysis
Discussion
Thank you!
• Full report:
https://www.traficom.fi/en/news/new-study-published-indicative-analysis-methods-used-control-ships-ballast-water-treatment