1

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2019: North Tyneside

Policy, Performance and Research

1 October 2019

2

This document has been produced by the Policy, Performance and Research team. It based on the Indices that are published by the

Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG).

Please note that indicators in the 2019 Indices of Deprivation relate to various financial years, including 2015/16 – 2017/18.

October 2019

3

Contents

Executive Summary Page 4

1. The English Indices of Multiple Deprivation Page 5

1.1 Using the IMD 2019 Page 5

2. Relative deprivation in North Tyneside Page 6

2.1 Overview of North Tyneside Page 6 2.2 Most deprived Page 8 2.3 Least deprived Page 8

3. North Tyneside Wards Page 9

4. A national and regional view Page 20

4

Executive Summary

• In 2019 North Tyneside is less deprived, relative to England, than it was in 2015 North Tyneside is ranked 128 out of 3171 Local Authorities (Lower Tier) in England (higher is better). In 2015 North Tyneside was ranked 126

This continues the improving trend2 from previous iterations of IMD, which is shown in the chart below (higher is better)

• While the overall number of local neighbourhoods within the most deprived 20% in England has remained level since 2015, there has been an increase in the number of neighbourhoods that are within the most deprived 10% of communities in England. In contrast there has been a reduction in the number of communities that are judged to be the most deprived 10% to 20% category of communities in England.

• There has been no change in the number of neighbourhoods that are in the least 10% deprived decile

• 9.3% (19,0193) of North Tyneside residents live in neighbourhoods judged to be in the 10% most deprived in England.

• 11.8% (24,219) residents live in the 20% most deprived neighbourhoods.

1 2015 data has been rebased to reflect that there are now only 317 Lower Tier LA’s (In 2015 there were 326 Lower Tier LA) 2 As defined by the Index of Multiple Deprivation Rank of Average Scores 3 Based on the 2017 Mid Year Population Estimates

80

102113

126 128

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

2004 2007 2010 2015 2019

Ran

k o

f A

vera

ge S

core

Index of Multiple Deprivation Rank of Average Rank 2004 - 2019

North Tyneside

5

1. The English Indices of Multiple Deprivation

The English Indices of Deprivation 2019 are based on 39 component indicators, organised across seven domains4 (and sub-domains) of deprivation which are combined, using appropriate weights, to calculate the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The following domain scores are weighted and combined to produce an overall IMD.

• Income Deprivation (22.5%)

• Employment Deprivation (22.5%)

• Education, Skills & Training Deprivation (13.5%)

• Health Deprivation and Disability (13.5%)

• Crime (9.3%)

• Barriers to Housing and Services (9.3%)

• Living Environment Deprivation (9.3%) This is an overall measure of multiple deprivation experienced by people living in an area and is calculated for every Lower layer Super Output Area (LSOA5) in England. An LSOA has an average population of 1,500 people, with a lower threshold of 1,000, and an upper threshold of 3,000. There are 32,844 LSOA’s in England; they are ranked according to their level of deprivation relative to that of other areas, 1 being classed the most deprived and 32,844 being the least.

1.1 Using the IMD 2019 The data can be used to assess which parts of North Tyneside face particular challenges, down to very small geographical areas. It is common to describe how relatively deprived an area is by saying whether it falls among the 10% or 20% most deprived areas in England. It is important to note that the indices are relative measures of deprivation. They do not indicate how much more deprived an area is, just that one is more deprived than the other. They are not a measure of affluence, i.e. the area ranked as most deprived is not necessarily the least affluent. Deprivation scores are based on the proportion of people living in a district or LSOA who are classed as deprived in circumstance and lifestyle, not whether the area itself is deprived. However it is not possible to identify deprived people, because you do not have to live in a deprived area to be deprived. The scores should not be compared between domains as they have different minimum and maximum values and ranges. To compare between domains, only the ranks should be used.

4 Domains of deprivation: Income, Employment; Education, Skills and Training; Health and Disability; Crime;

Barriers to Housing and Services; and Living Environment. 5 LSOA (Lower Layer Super Output Area) is a unit of geography for the collection and publication of small area

statistics. There are 32,844 LSOA’s in England, and 131 in North Tyneside.

6

2. Relative deprivation in North Tyneside

2.1. Overview of North Tyneside While North Tyneside has improved, relative to England, there has been an increase in the number of small neighbourhoods that are within the most deprived 10% of communities in England. In contrast there has been a reduction in the number of communities within the most deprived 10% to 20% of communities in England. The chart below shows the movement in overall deprivation by decile for the LSOA’s in North Tyneside, between the 2019 IMD, 2015IMD and the 2010 IMD.

The two maps on the next page show the relative deprivation in North Tyneside for IMD2015 compared to IMD 2019

0

5

10

15

20

25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Nu

mb

er

of

LSO

A's

Decile of Deprivation

IMD: North Tyneside LSOA's by Decile of Deprivation2010 LSOA's

2015 LSOA's

2019 LSOA's

Most Deprived Least Deprived

7

2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation – North Tyneside

2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation – North Tyneside

8

2.2. Most Deprived

There are currently 131 LSOA’s in North Tyneside, of which, twelve are in the most deprived (worst 10%) in England. The previous IMD in 2015 reported nine North Tyneside LSOA’s in the most deprived 10%. There are fifteen LSOA’s in the 20% most deprived in England. Previously, in the 2015 IMD, there were eighteen LSOA’s in the 20% most deprived in England.

10% and 20% most deprived areas of North Tyneside

2.3. Least Deprived

There has been no change in the number of small neighbourhoods that are in the least deprived areas in England. Eighteen LSOA’s in North Tyneside are in the least 10% deprived decile.

9

3. Ward level information The rank of the individual LSOA’s can be aggregated and applied at a Ward level to give an IMD rank by Ward.

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

IMD

Ran

k

IMD: Change in Average Rank of Wards2010 Average Rank

2015 Average Rank

2019 Average Rank

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

Wal

lsen

d

Be

nto

n

Pre

sto

n

No

rth

um

ber

lan

d

Co

llin

gwo

od

Ch

irto

n

Cu

llerc

oat

s

Lon

gben

ton

Ho

wd

on

Riv

ersi

de

Val

ley

Mo

nks

eat

on

Nth

Mo

nks

eat

on

Sth

Kill

ingw

ort

h

Bat

tle

Hill

Cam

per

do

wn

St M

ary'

s

Tyn

em

ou

th

Wh

itle

y B

ay

We

etsl

ade

Ch

ange

in R

ank

Difference in IMD Ward Average Rank between 2015 and 2019 Ward Rank Better

Ward Rank Worse

10

Of the 20 North Tyneside Wards, 13 have seen their overall national rank worsen from the previous IMD, and 7 have improved, relative to the rest of the Country.

Change in Average Rank by IMD Domain

90 144 137

-874

1220

-1955

-3921

3937

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000O

VER

ALL

IMD

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Battle Hill Ward

-1623

-343-1213

-333 -441

-10782

-2414

2116

-12000

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Benton Ward

11

91497

-107

-1050

1323

3056

-7776

1894

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Camperdown Ward

-949-116 -656

8 604

-18377

7796

5615

-20000

-15000

-10000

-5000

0

5000

10000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Chirton Ward

12

-1130-420 -659 -742

620

-135

-8191

2824

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Collingwood Ward

-630

21

-242

2018942

-8250

-3458

2002

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Cullercoats Ward

13

-494

36 139

-864

745

-12693

3779 4055

-14000

-12000

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Howdon Ward

-20-700 -295

290

2302

43

-7590

4394

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Killingworth Ward

14

-1383 -1013-1440

65

-1084

-9225

-302

3855

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Longbenton Ward

-237

143384

-486

934

-2983

-4309

1690

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Monkseaton North Ward

15

-55-437 -125

1738 2055

-7635

-2220

2573

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Monkseaton South Ward

-1195 -1316

367

-83

6

-4104

-6002

3087

-7000

-6000

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Northumberland Ward

16

-1383 -1013-1440

65

-1084

-9225

-302

3855

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Preston Ward

-461 -227 -104

783 397

-12099

2204

6983

-15000

-10000

-5000

0

5000

10000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Riverside Ward

17

179802

1943

204

-459

4850

-11998

1340

-14000

-12000

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

St Mary's Ward

268 333

-295

6821380

-9315

33614215

-10000

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Tynemouth Ward

18

-391

218 335 150

1917

-5799-6550

3583

-8000

-6000

-4000

-2000

0

2000

4000

6000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Valley Ward

-1771

82

-393 -1262

713

-27102

17320

5525

-30000

-25000

-20000

-15000

-10000

-5000

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Wallsend Ward

19

711 655

1504

-900

1808

178

-5042

2244

-6000

-5000

-4000

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

OV

ERA

LL IM

D

INC

OM

E

EMP

LOYM

ENT

EDU

CA

TIO

N S

KIL

LSA

ND

TR

AIN

ING

HEA

LTH

DEP

RIV

ATI

ON

AN

D D

ISA

BIL

ITY

BA

RR

IER

S TO

HO

USI

NG

AN

D S

ERV

ICES C

RIM

E

LIV

ING

EN

VIR

ON

MEN

T

Ch

ange

in A

vera

ge R

ank

Weetslade Ward

20

4. A national and regional view

Middlesbrough, Liverpool, Knowsley, Kingston upon Hull and Manchester are the local authorities with the highest proportions of neighbourhoods among the most deprived in England. This is largely unchanged from 2015 The heatmap below shows the relative rankings across England (darker shade equates to more deprived)

The table below shows the rankings for the 12 north east authorities.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

IMD Average Rank: By Local Authority 2015 IMD (rebased) Rank of AverageScore

2019 IMD Rank of Average Score