indonesia peter d. ellis senior urban economist easis
TRANSCRIPT
INDONESIA
Incentivizing Local Government Deliveryby Rewarding Results in Indonesia
Peter D. EllisSenior Urban EconomistEASIS
2
Local Government (LG) Engagement Approach
Lack of transparency and accountability
Inadequate and cumbersome reporting
Weak monitoring and evaluation
Very little verification
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
Strengthen Country Institutions
Target large set of LGs
Improve LG internal controls
Work through existing transfer system
3
Dana Alokasi Khusus (Specific Purpose Grants)
Dana Alokasi Khusus (Specific Purpose Grants) allocated from national budget to local governments (LGs) to finance specific activities which are determined by the central government but under the jurisdiction of LG.
DAK allocation amount is determined on annual basis within the national budget, with LGs satisfying specific criteria to qualify
Total DAK allocation for 2010 is about US$2.32 billion.
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
4
The Project will be a pilot with a proposed size of US$ 220 million over four years.
Focused in five provinces: Jambi, East Java, Central Kalimantan, West Sulawesi, and North Maluku.
Will be designed as Specific Investment Lending and the mechanism will be Output-Based Disbursement (OBD) triggered by achievement of results.
The project will focus on the infrastructure sector (road, irrigation, water and sanitation), which makes up about 21% of DAK allocations
Overview of DAK Reimbursement Program
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
5
Five Pilot Provinces
6
MoF BAPPENAS MoHA MPW
NATIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE
Executing Agency
DGFB
MPW
Secretariat General
LG
PROV KAB KOT
BPKP
WB
Integrated Financial and Output Verification Reports
Outputs
DINAS/SKPDDGBM
DGSDA
DGCK
OVR
Reimbursement
ItJen
Monitoring & Evaluation of DAK Program
Institutional Arrangements
7
Project Development Objectives (DO)and Results Framework (RF)
PDO:
Improve the accountability and reporting of the central government’s Specific Purpose Grants (DAK) for the infrastructure sectors.
RF: Improve financial and technical reporting
RF: Conduct output verification of projects financed by DAK funds
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
8
Results focused• Reward Performance with grants• Reimburse eligible outputs
Strengthen Government Systems• Central government ownership and control
Strengthen LG Internal Controls
Web-based Monitoring and Reporting SystemsIndependent Verification of Outputs and Compliance
• Government internal auditor, BPKP
Key Features of DAK Program
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
9
Output Eligibility Criteria for Reimbursement
Physical Realization of Outputs
• Construction Completion Certificates.
• Compliance with Technical Specifications
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
Compliance with National
Procurement
• National Procurement
Law and Regulations
through competitive
procedures in hiring of
contractors.
Compliance with Environmental &
Social Safeguards:
• Compliance with
Indicators listed in the
Project Operations
Manual.
• MPW Minister Issue
Supplement to Technical
Guidelines.
10
Fiduciary and Safeguards Aspects
•Follow national procurement procedures
Procurement
•BPK as auditor of program
Financial Managem
ent
•Comply with Bank policies on social and environment
•Environmental AMDAL acceptable
•Social Addendum to Technical Guidelines for compliance with Involuntary Resettlement and Indigenous People
Safeguards
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
11
The State Finance and Development Supervisory Board (BPKP) will carry out the output verification process on a representative sample basis for projects in LGs.
Verification of Outputs (VO)
BPKP will finance the VO function.
BPKP will report its finding and recommendations in an Output Verification Report (OVR).
OVR will be the only basis to request Bank disbursements.
BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK
12
Delivering Institutional Strengthening (TA) to LGs.Delays in the delivery of TA due to restructuring in
MoF.
Compliance with Technical Guidelines. LGs lack capacity to deliver DAK outputs and to
submit reports.
Coordination within Central Government. Multiple GoI stakeholders have overlapping roles.
Monitoring & EvaluationUnclear on who should conduct M&E.
Challenges in Project
Implementation
13
Advance Payment. Made on July 5, 2011 and covers 64 percent of eligible districts.
Verification Arrangement. BPKP has finalized verification guidelines and started verification test-run with LGs.
Development of WBRS. Developing a new web-based system for financial and technical reporting.
Improved Coordination. GoI has held several coordination meetings to define the role of each stakeholder in the project implementation.
What Has Improved So Far
14
Scale up existing project to more Provinces or sectors
Deepen reforms within LGs Promote improved accountability
downwards Greater transparency in budgeting Strengthen LG annual planning and
execution Improve efficiency and effectiveness of
expenditures
WHAT’S NEXT?