indonesia peter d. ellis senior urban economist easis

14
INDONESIA ntivizing Local Government Deli Rewarding Results in Indonesia Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

Upload: jasper-daniels

Post on 18-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

INDONESIA

Incentivizing Local Government Deliveryby Rewarding Results in Indonesia

Peter D. EllisSenior Urban EconomistEASIS

Page 2: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

2

Local Government (LG) Engagement Approach

Lack of transparency and accountability

Inadequate and cumbersome reporting

Weak monitoring and evaluation

Very little verification

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Strengthen Country Institutions

Target large set of LGs

Improve LG internal controls

Work through existing transfer system

Page 3: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

3

Dana Alokasi Khusus (Specific Purpose Grants)

Dana Alokasi Khusus (Specific Purpose Grants) allocated from national budget to local governments (LGs) to finance specific activities which are determined by the central government but under the jurisdiction of LG.

DAK allocation amount is determined on annual basis within the national budget, with LGs satisfying specific criteria to qualify

Total DAK allocation for 2010 is about US$2.32 billion.

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Page 4: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

4

The Project will be a pilot with a proposed size of US$ 220 million over four years.

Focused in five provinces: Jambi, East Java, Central Kalimantan, West Sulawesi, and North Maluku.

Will be designed as Specific Investment Lending and the mechanism will be Output-Based Disbursement (OBD) triggered by achievement of results.

The project will focus on the infrastructure sector (road, irrigation, water and sanitation), which makes up about 21% of DAK allocations

Overview of DAK Reimbursement Program

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Page 5: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

5

Five Pilot Provinces

Page 6: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

6

MoF BAPPENAS MoHA MPW

NATIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE

Executing Agency

DGFB

MPW

Secretariat General

LG

PROV KAB KOT

BPKP

WB

Integrated Financial and Output Verification Reports

Outputs

DINAS/SKPDDGBM

DGSDA

DGCK

OVR

Reimbursement

ItJen

Monitoring & Evaluation of DAK Program

Institutional Arrangements

Page 7: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

7

Project Development Objectives (DO)and Results Framework (RF)

PDO:

Improve the accountability and reporting of the central government’s Specific Purpose Grants (DAK) for the infrastructure sectors.

RF: Improve financial and technical reporting

RF: Conduct output verification of projects financed by DAK funds

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Page 8: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

8

Results focused• Reward Performance with grants• Reimburse eligible outputs

Strengthen Government Systems• Central government ownership and control

Strengthen LG Internal Controls

Web-based Monitoring and Reporting SystemsIndependent Verification of Outputs and Compliance

• Government internal auditor, BPKP

Key Features of DAK Program

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Page 9: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

9

Output Eligibility Criteria for Reimbursement

Physical Realization of Outputs

• Construction Completion Certificates.

• Compliance with Technical Specifications

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Compliance with National

Procurement

• National Procurement

Law and Regulations

through competitive

procedures in hiring of

contractors.

Compliance with Environmental &

Social Safeguards:

• Compliance with

Indicators listed in the

Project Operations

Manual.

• MPW Minister Issue

Supplement to Technical

Guidelines.

Page 10: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

10

Fiduciary and Safeguards Aspects

•Follow national procurement procedures

Procurement

•BPK as auditor of program

Financial Managem

ent

•Comply with Bank policies on social and environment

•Environmental AMDAL acceptable

•Social Addendum to Technical Guidelines for compliance with Involuntary Resettlement and Indigenous People

Safeguards

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Page 11: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

11

The State Finance and Development Supervisory Board (BPKP) will carry out the output verification process on a representative sample basis for projects in LGs.

Verification of Outputs (VO)

BPKP will finance the VO function.

BPKP will report its finding and recommendations in an Output Verification Report (OVR).

OVR will be the only basis to request Bank disbursements.

BANK DUNIA │THE WORLD BANK

Page 12: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

12

Delivering Institutional Strengthening (TA) to LGs.Delays in the delivery of TA due to restructuring in

MoF.

Compliance with Technical Guidelines. LGs lack capacity to deliver DAK outputs and to

submit reports.

Coordination within Central Government. Multiple GoI stakeholders have overlapping roles.

Monitoring & EvaluationUnclear on who should conduct M&E.

Challenges in Project

Implementation

Page 13: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

13

Advance Payment. Made on July 5, 2011 and covers 64 percent of eligible districts.

Verification Arrangement. BPKP has finalized verification guidelines and started verification test-run with LGs.

Development of WBRS. Developing a new web-based system for financial and technical reporting.

Improved Coordination. GoI has held several coordination meetings to define the role of each stakeholder in the project implementation.

What Has Improved So Far

Page 14: INDONESIA Peter D. Ellis Senior Urban Economist EASIS

14

Scale up existing project to more Provinces or sectors

Deepen reforms within LGs Promote improved accountability

downwards Greater transparency in budgeting Strengthen LG annual planning and

execution Improve efficiency and effectiveness of

expenditures

WHAT’S NEXT?