indoor vapour inhalation risks from a leaded gasoline ... · nino devdariani, b.sc., m.env.sc....
TRANSCRIPT
Indoor Vapour Inhalation Risks from a Leaded
Gasoline Additive (1,2-Dichloroethane) that
Still Contaminates Groundwater
By: Karl Bresee, B.Sc., PBD, P.Biol. &
Nino Devdariani, B.Sc., M.Env.Sc.
Intrinsik Corp.
April 5, 2017
Fairmont Banff Springs, Banff
Outline
• History and use in gasoline
• Environmental fate and partitioning
• Environmental quality guidelines
• Case Study #1
• Case Study #2
• Indoor air sources
• Toxicology
• Conclusion1,2-Dichloroethane (DCA)
C2H4Cl2
History and Use in Gasoline
• DCA was used as “lead
scavenger”
• Since 1990, Canada’s
Gasoline Regulations
limit concentrations of
lead in gasoline
• DCA encountered at
historically impacted
gasoline sites
Environmental Fate and Partitioning
Property Value Reference
Molecular weight 98.96 g/mol SRC 2013
Henry’s law constant 0.00118 atm-m³/mol SRC 2013
Vapour pressure 78.9 mmHg SRC 2013
Water solubility 8,600 mg/L SRC 2013
Half-life in groundwater
23 years
1-30 years
GOC 1994
ATSDR 2001
Volatile
Soluble
Persistent
Environmental Fate and Partitioning
• Fugacity modeling (US EPA 2012)
Environmental
MediaAir (%) Water (%) Soil (%) Sediment (%)
Released to air 97 2 <1 <1
Released to water 16 84 <1 <1
Released to soil 26 4 70 <1
GROUNDWATER
• Groundwater quality guidelines (μg/L) (AEP 2016)
Environmental Quality Guidelines
Land Use
Human Health Ecological Receptors
Vapour InhalationPotable Water Aquatic Life
Coarse Fine
Residential 10 170 5 100
Commercial 130 1,200 5 100
SOIL VAPOUR
• Soil vapour quality guidelines (<1 m depth) (μg/m³)
INDOOR AIR
• Inhalation exposure limit: 0.4 μg/m³ (AEP 2016)
Environmental Quality Guidelines
Land UseHuman Health
Vapour Inhalation
Residential 40
Commercial 140
Case Study #1
• Village in southern Alberta
• Commercial land use
• Property developed prior to 1929 as hardware store
and gas bar
• Source is former underground storage tanks (USTs)
and pump island
• Petroleum hydrocarbons investigated in soil,
groundwater, soil vapour and sub-slab vapour
Case Study #1
• Shallow
(<1 m)
soil
vapour
samples
Land Use
Vapour Inhalation
Soil Vapour
Guideline (μg/m³)
Residential 40
Commercial 140
Case Study #2
• Community in Calgary, Alberta
• Residential land use
• Source is nearby former gasoline station
– Decommissioned and USTs removed in mid-1990s
• Petroleum hydrocarbons investigated in soil,
groundwater, soil vapour and indoor air of homes
Case Study #2
• DCA measured
in groundwater
• 42 monitoring
wells
• 302 samples
• Groundwater
depth 5 to 10 m0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Gro
un
dw
ate
r C
on
cen
tra
tio
n (μ
g/L
)
Sample Date
Indoor Vapour Inhalation Groundwater Guideline DCA
Case Study #2
• DCA analyzed
in soil vapour
(1 to 6 m
depth)
• 45 locations
• 90 samples
• Detection limit
0.4 μg/m³ 0.1
1
10
100
So
il V
ap
ou
r C
on
ce
ntr
ati
on
(μ
g/m
³)
Sample Date
Indoor Vapour Inhalation Soil Vapour Guideline DCA
<0.4 (n=44) <0.4 (n=45)
Case Study #2
• DCA
analyzed in
indoor air
• Detection limit
0.4 μg/m³
• Sub-slab
sample non-
detect
(<0.4 μg/m³)0.05
0.5
5
Summer2014
Fall 2014 Summer2015
Summer2016
Winter 2017 Indoor Air -Canada
(GOC 1994)
Indoor Air -USA (US
EPA 2011)
Outdoor Air- Calgary
Air
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n (μ
g/m
³)
<0.4 <0.4
Inhalation Exposure Limit DCA
Case Study #2 Indoor Air
Indoor Air Sources
• DCA found in automotive products, oils, greases
and lubricants and miscellaneous products (Sack et
al. 1992)
• DCA also found in cleaning agents, pesticides,
glued wallpaper and glued carpet (Wallace et al.
1987)
• North American residences average detection
frequency 13.8% (US EPA 2011)
Indoor Air Sources
• A recent study conducted in the United States found that
consumer products, namely molded plastic holiday
ornaments manufactured in China, were the primary
sources of DCA in indoor air (Doucette et al. 2009)
• In one home, the room in which molded plastic
ornaments were stored had a DCA concentration of 82
μg/m³, while in other rooms of the house concentration
ranged from 0.41 to 12 μg/m³
Toxicology
• DCA carcinogenic via ingestion (US EPA 1987)
• Oral slope factor = 0.091 per (mg/kg/day)
• Inhalation unit risk was calculated from oral data
• Inhalation unit risk = 2.6E-05 per (μg/m³)
Toxicology
• Acceptable
benchmark
incremental cancer
risk = 1.0E-05 (i.e.,
1 in 100,000)
• 0.4 μg/m³ DCA is
associated with
1.0E-05 risk of
cancer (AEP 2016) 1.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.0E-04
1.0E-03
1.0E-02
1.0E-01
1.0E+00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Incre
men
tal C
an
cer
Ris
k
Air Concentration (μg/m³)
DCA Vinyl Chloride Benzene
Toxicology - Uncertainty
• Extrapolating from oral to inhalation exposure
• No consideration by US EPA for potential differences in
metabolism between oral and inhalation exposures,
internal exposure, mode of effect or key toxicological
endpoints
• An evaluation of pharmacokinetics and mode of action
after oral and inhalation exposure should be undertaken
to ensure that it is appropriate to use oral values for
inhalation exposures (CCME 2014)
Conclusions
• Consider DCA as a chemical of concern for sites
with old gasoline impacts
• Always collect sub-slab and/or soil vapour
samples when analyzing indoor air to address
background indoor sources
• Health risks need to be interpreted cautiously
due to toxicological uncertainty
ReferencesAEP (Alberta Environment and Parks). 2016. Alberta Tier 1 Soil and Groundwater Remediation Guidelines.
ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 2001. Toxicological Profile for 1,2-Dichloroethane.
CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment). 2014. A Protocol for the Derivation of Soil Vapour Quality Guidelines for Protection of Human
Exposures Via Inhalation of Vapours.
Doucette, W.J., Hall, A.J. and Gorder, K.A. 2009. Emissions of 1,2-Dichloroethane from holiday decorations as a source of indoor air contamination. Ground
Water Monitoring & Remediation, 30(1):65-71.
GOC (Government of Canada). 1994. Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Priority Substances List Assessment Report. 1,2-Dichloroethane.
Sack, T.M., Steele, D.H, Hammerstrom, D. and Remmers, J. 1992. A survey of household products for volatile organic compounds. Atmospheric Environment,
26A(6):1063-1070.
SRC (Syracuse Research Corporation). 2013. FatePointers Search Module. Website: http://esc.syrres.com/fatepointer/search.asp.
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1987. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Chemical Assessment Summary. 1,2-
Dichloroethane; CASRN 107-06-2. Website: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/subst/0149_summary.pdf.
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2011. Background Indoor Air Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in North American
Residences (1990-2005): A Compilation of Statistics for Assessing Vapor Intrusion. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA 530—R-
10-001.
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. Estimation Program Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11. United States
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
Wallace, L.A., Pellizzari, E., Leaderer, B., Zelon, H. and Sheldon, L. 1987. Emissions of volatile organic compounds from building materials and consumer
products. Atmospheric Environment, 21(2):385-393.
Figures: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/12/1,2-dichloroethane-eclipsed-side-3D-balls.png,
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gamersincepong/4987129907, Doucette et al. 2009