industrial waste control site remedial … waste control site remedial investigation/ feasibility...
TRANSCRIPT
INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL SITEREMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/
FEASIBILITY STUDY
FINALWORK PLAN
JANUARY 25. 1984
CH2M HILL Project No. W-66237.00
Prepared by:Subconsultant:
CH2M HILL. INC.Black & Veatch Engineers-ArchitectsEcology & Environiiient; Field Investigation Team; Region VI
This document has been prepared for the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency under Contract No. 68-01-6692. The material contained herein isnot to be disclosed to, discussed with, or made available to any personor persons foe any reason without the prior express approval of aresponsible official of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
OCCOCC63
000885
WORK PLAN FORREMEDIAL INVESTIGATION AND FEASIBILITY STUDY
FORINDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL SITE
FORT SMITH. ARKANSAS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTIONA. Work PlanB. Historical SummaryC. Activity 1 - Project Startup Activities
Pa&e1-11-11-11-2
II. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION II-l
III. WORK PLAN ACTIVITIES FOR REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONActivity RI2 - Site Definition Activities
Phase I Site InvestigationsPhase II Site InvestigationRemedial Investigation ReportManagement Activities
Activity RI3Activity RI4Activity RI5Activity RJ6
111-1111-1111-4111-15III-19111-20
IV. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE FEASIBILITY STUDY IV-1
V. WORK PLAN ACTIVITIES FOR THE FEASIBILITY STUDYDevelop Potential Remedial AlternativesActivity FS1
Activity FS2Activity FS3Activity FS4Activity FS5Activity FS6Activity FS7Activity FS8
Screen AlternativesRecommend and Conduct AdditionalEngineering Studies
Technically Assess and Evaluate theAlternatives
Prepare Preliminary ReportPrepare Conceptual DesignPrepare Final ReportManagement Activities
VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE
V-lV-lV-2V-2V-3V-5V-5V-6V-7
VI-1
TC-1
IWC WP11/9/84
000886
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)
FIGURES:Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
APPENDIX:Appendix A -Appendix B "Appendix C -
Boring and Ground Water Monitoring WellLocations
Project Schedule, Project Startup and RemedialInvestigations (Phase 1 and Phase II)Project Schedule, Feasibility Study AfterRI Phases I an4 XI
Detailed Cost Summary
Project team Organization
Priority Pollutant - Laboratory Analysis
000887
WORK PLAN FORREMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDYAT TIE INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL SITE
FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS
I. INTRODUCTION
A- Work Plan
This work plan was prepared to response to CH2M HILL'S Task Order
iio. 602 dated October 31, 1983. The basts for the Work Plan is the Draft
Remedial Action Master Plan (RAMP) prepared by CH2M KILL and dated 03
r-September 30, 1983.1^
Schedules ahoviag the duration and sequence of all work tasks are pre" '"*0*•"'»eented as Figures 2 and 3 at the end of this Worh Plan.
B. Historical Summary
The Industrial Waste Control (IWC) Site is an unsecured industrial
waste landfill located in Se'i/aatian County, Arkansas, approximately 8 miles
south of Fort Smith. The landfill operation was located along with liquid
waate io-nounAncnts in an abandoned coal strip mine. bastes from a variety
of local industries were accepted there from at least 1974 through 1978.
The site was used as a duap for several years prior to 197^, but records
are v^gue concerning what material was dumped during those initial years.
The site was covered and closed in 1978. Analyses of soil and water
samples in the area have indicated th& site has the potential to adversely
affect public health and the environment. Historical data indicates
ecological damage may have already occurred due to migration of waste
materials from the site.
1-1
000888
C. Activity 1.0 - Project Startup Activities
Several tasks identified ia the RAMP as Project Startup Activities
have been undertaken simultaneously with preparation of this Work Plan
which is identified as Task 1.6. These tasks include:
o Task 1.1 Assemble Project Team
o Task 1.2 Collect and Review Background Data
o Task 1.5 Identify Project Goals and Objectives
The completion of these tasks is discussed in the paragraphs below.
TASK 1.1. ASSEMBLE PROJECT TEAM 0\
r-1-The remedial investigations and feasibility study at the Industrial E^
T—Waste Control site will be performed by project team personnel from CH2M Q
HILL (CH2M), Black & Vcatch (B&V) and Ecology and Environment's Field
Investigation Team for Region VI (E£FIT).
Dr. Richard E. Moos of CH2M will act as the Site Project Manager,
performing overall management activities for the project and coordinating
the RI/FS activities of B&V and EEFIT.
Black 6 Veatch will direct and manage all FS activities, prepare work
plans and assist EEFIT in design and performance of the remedial tnv-'stiga*
tiou. EEFIT will be primarily responsible for the execution of the RI,
including subsurface investigations, sampling and prcpcration of the RI
report.
A more detailed description of project teaa organization aad responsi-
bilities is included in Appendix B. Project responaihilitiea are also
defined throughout this work plan.
Subcontractors from the area capable of performing soil borings and
installing ground fa'ater monitoring wells, conducting aerial photography «nd
1-2IWC WH1/9/84
000889
site surveys, conducting geophysical surveys, and fencing the site will be
identified. These subcontractors will be contacted regarding their avail-
ability to perform the required services. The costs presented in Appendix
A represent estimates for the proposed scope of services identified at this
time.
TASK 1.2. COLLECT AND REVIEW BACKGROUND DATA^^; • " " - " ' " ™
The Work Plan has been prepared baaed on the evaluation of the Draft
Remedial Action Master Plan, the Field Investigation Team Reports of 1981
and 1983, and background data and correspondence pertaining to Arkansas o
waste management rules and regulations, geological and soils information,
landfill site operation, previous site litigation, and mining activities in 'r"0
the area. Other background data provided by CH2M HILL has been preliai-
narily reviewed for general applicability to this work plan development.
TASK 1.5. IDmiFY PROJECT GOALSAHD OBJECTIVES
The goals and objectives of performing the RI/FS at the Industrial
Waste Control site include:'
o To identify the problems (existing and potential) associated withthe hazardous materials disposed on site.
o To gather sufficient information to determine tha need for andpotential extent of remedial action.
o To develop appropriate remedial action alternatives to mitigatethe problems identified.
o To evaluate the alternatives and to develop the most appropriateremedial alternative.
Identification of theae goals and objectives allows the project management
personnel to target vork efforts and ttonttor performance during project
progress.
1-3IWC WP11/9/84
000890
Detailed discussions of t^e scope and objectives of th^ remedial
'.nvestigatioos and feasibility study are presented in Sections II and IV of
this Work Plan.
The following Project Startup Activity Tasks identified in the RAMP
will be completed by Black & Veatch, Ecology & Environment and CH2M HILL or
others prior to initiation of Site Definition Activities.
o Task 1.3 Prepare Quality Assurance Project Plan
o Task 1.4 Prepare Site Health and Safety Plan
o Task 1.7 Develop a Community Relations Plan. v-00The procedures used to perform these tasks are described below. ^
TASK 1.3. PREPARE QUALITY ASSURAKCE PROJECT PLAH ^r-k
CH2M will have overall quality assurance responsibilities, will review
-T* nroject deliverablea and will perform quality assurance audits based on
the QAPP addressing all elements of the project.
A Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) will be prepared by CH2M with
Input from B&V and EEFIT to ensure quality control during site activities.
The QAPP will consist of a Quality Control Plan and a Site Sampling Plan.
The Quality Control Plan will incorporate, by reference, the .ppropriate
portions of the REM/FIT general quality assurance plan. The Quality Control
Plan will address: quality assurance objectives for aeasureaeat data,
instrument calibration procedures, quality control performance audits and
reporting, preventive maintenance, and corrective action procedures and
documentation.
The Site Sampling Plan will be prepared by EEFIT prior to any sampling
operations. The plan will: define sampling locations by site map and
1-4£WC WP1
R£V 1/25/84
000891
narrative; establish the media to be sampled; define the number of samples
from each media and quantities of sample material required; establish
sampling techniques, preservation, packaging and container requirements for
the various typ^s of samples; provide documentation, chain-of-custody and
shipping information; and define specific quality assurance requirements.
The plan will be based on information obtained during the preparation of
the Work Plan.
The QAPP will be submitted by the project staff to EPA project
personnel for review and comment prior to implementation.
TASK 1 .4 . PREPARE SITEJC&ALTH AM) SAFETY PLAH .
CMCDr-
The site-specific Health and Safety Plan will be prepared by Ecology0
and Environment (Corporate Office). la accordance with this plan, EEFIT ^
will provide a Site Safety Officer (SSO). The SSO will conduct field
safety training at the site for all project team personnel and subcontrac-
tor personnel who must perform work at the site.
The IWC Project Staff will review the site Health and Safety Plan as
it effects proposed activities at the site and suggest areas of clarifi-
cation or modification. Each project team firm, and any subcontracting
firms, will be responsible for providing safety equipment, clothing, etc.
for their personnel in compliance with the plan.
TASK 1 - 6 . PREPARE WORK PLAN
The project team has prepared a detailed work plan for the remedial
investigation, Phaae I and Phase II, and for tha feasibility study and
conceptual design. The work plan is based Oil currant available data and
can be modified as necessary during the perform&oce of the work to reflect
Major changes in the vork scope or effort-
1-5IWC WP1
SEV 1/25/84
000892
The work plan scope has been developed utilizing the combined capa-
bilities and expertise of each member of the project team. The scope of
the remedial investigations follows the general guidance provided by the
Draft RAMP, but is more definitive on the extent of proposed investiga-
tions. The feasibility study/conceptual design scopes are general in
nature and may be further defined as the work progresses.
TASK 1.7. DEVELOPLACOMMUNITY'RELATIONS PLAN
The Community Relations Plan will be developed for EPA Region VI by
CH2M un^er a separate work assignment. However, the Rl/FS Project Team^00
may be required to support the conBnuaity relations program at regularr^-T-
intervals. /*-,^w'
/—t
Examples of expected support activities include:
o Preparation of documents such as diagrams, plans, charts, etc..to support community relations and to assist in obtaining permitsor other institutional requirements.
o Attend public meetings and project review meetings.
o Hake presentations and briefings as needed.
The budget allowance for this task is 150 person hours and $1,500
travel and expense allowance. EPA through the CH2M Site Project Manager,
will request appropriate community relations support as needed. Labor and
expenses for the requested support will be estimated and monitored on a
monthly basis for comparison with the budgeted allowances.
1-6IWC WP1
KEV 1/25/84
000893
II. SCOPE AM) OBJECTIVES OF REMEDIAL INVESTIGATIONS
The Remedial Investigation, in addition to the project startup tasks
identified in the Introduction, will require performance of the following
activities:
Activity RI2.0 - Site Definition Activities
Activity RI3.0 " Phase I Site Investigations
Activity RI4.0 - Phase II Site Investigations
Activity RI5.0 - Preliminary Remedial Technologies
Activity R16.0 - Remedial Investigation P.eport
Activity RI7.0 - Management Activities
<=}•00r-
Site Definition Activities will establish a detailed data base to Q^\
define the basic physical characteristics of the site. The health and
safety and site security facilities required will also be established on
site during these activities.
The Site Investigation Activities will be performed in ttfo phases
because subsurface information at the site is almost nonexistent. During
Phase I, the subsurface data voids will be filled and the nature and
general extent of problems or hazards at the IWC site will be determined.
At the conclusion of this initial phase, any further data gaps that may
exist will be identified. It* additional information is needed, Phase II
investigations will be designed to complete the data base required for
developing and evaluating remedial action alternatives. The Phase II
investigations would include more extensive and intensive field studies
and testing programs. The exact nature and scope of these secondary
investigations can not be defined until the initial field studies are
completed. However, an expected scope of work, baaed on current knowledge
H-l
IwC WP11/9/8A
000894
of the site, is proposed in this work plan. This work scope will be
revised as additional site data become available during Phase I.
The development and refinement of reasonable remedial technology
alternatives will be an ongoing task throughout the Remedial Investigation.
Consideration of all practical alternatives will assure that Site Investi-
gations are'designed and conducted to obtain the required site data.
The Remedial Investigation Report will present the results of the
investigations in a com^ rehensive Banner to provide the necessary data for
evaluation and selection of remedial action alternatives. inooUJ
EPA will be kept informed of the technical progress and financial t^-v"status of the investigation through monthly reports and by frequent ^
<'—»communication between the SPM and RSPO. Project management will also
include documentation of field and sampling activities, and maintenance of
critical project communications in a secured project file.
The objectives of performing the Remedial Investigation at the IWCsite include:
o Identification of contaminants posing immediate or chronichazards to public health and safety.
o Evaluation of the physical characteristics of the IVC Site.
o Evaluation of the type and extent of soil and groundvater con-tamination at the IWC Site.
o Evaluation of the type and extent of soil, grouadwater, andsurface water contamination that nay have siigratad from the IWCSite.
o Assessment of pathways of surface and groundwater transport ofcootaminaots.
o Evaluation of whether or not the IVC Site contamination hasadversely affected the area ecology.
000895
11-3
IWC WPl1/9/84
000896
III. REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION ACTIVITIESThe description of the tasks and subtasks required to accomplish each
of the Remedial Investigation activities is presented below.ACTIVITY RI2.0 - SITE DEFINITION ACTIVITIES
The Site Definition activities will define the basic physical char-acteristics of the IWC site and will establish on-site health and safetyfacilities for use by all field personnel.TASK RI2.1. COLLECT ADDITIONAL DATA
t—CO
Subtask RI2.1'.I InitiateIndividuals.
Contacts with Agencies, Companies, andr-
Contact officials with EPA, ADPCE, Sebastian County, Jenny Lind, <—University of Arkansas, Arkansas Geological Commission, IWC, Qprevious site investigators such as Ecology and Environment or ^McClelland Consulting Engineers, waste contributing industriessuch as Whirlpool or General Electric, local Audubon Society andother agencies, companies and individuals with site information.EPA will initiate contacts with ADPCE and any industries and willmake all official contacts with local news, citizen groups andlocal officials. The officials will be contacted by telephoneand/or letter requesting information applicable to the IWC site.The information requested will include: reports of previous siteinvestigation work, mining activity, analytical test results,boring log data (Shell Oil Co.; Western Coal and Hiaiog Co.) , -geological and hydrogeological ttiaps, aerial photography, sitephotographs, boundary and topographic survey data, local watersupply information, maps with locations of groundwater wells,utility maps, waste generator, hauler, and facility owner files,stream flow and soil classification data.
Subtask RI2.1.2 Collect Data.
For budgetary purposes it is assumed two members of the projectstaff, EEFIT, will need to travel to the Fort Smith area tosearch files and collect applicable data.
Subtask RI2.1.3 Review Data.
The data collected and the background information ccUactedduring project initiation will be reviaw&d to idantify iRfonaa-tion gaps. A standard project form will be coaapletat! fldBVBarizingeach major technical report reviewed. Tbift fiUflyaary will bedistributed to other members of the project team.
m-iIWC WPl
REV 1/25/84
000897
TASK RI2.2. VISIT SITE
Subfcask RI2.2.1 Contact local Officials and agencies.
Local officials will be contacted by phone and/or letter todevelop liaison for future investigations on*sifce. Contactpersons will be identified by EPA for some agencies- Contactswill be initiated by both Black & Veatch and EEJFIT personnel.Contacts will be coordinated through the EPA RSPO and theconsaunity relations group. The agencies contacted will include:sheriffs, police and Jire departments; Sebastian County HealthDepartment; and local hospitals.
Subtask RI2.2.2 Conduct Site J'amniarizatioc Visit.
After the EPA has obtained permission to access the site, the /w->CH2H HILL SPH, two pers'.-anel from Black & Veatch and one from _EEFIT will visit the site initially to determine pertinent physi-cal site features, site boundary conditions, available site r"access roads, existing access control, distance to hospitals s""and/or emergency facilities, proximity of utilities. ©
/"*TASK RI2.3. PREPARE^TOPOGRAPHIC: SITg_MAP.
Subtask RI2.3.1 Review Legal Description o^ IWC_S_ifce,
The leg^l description of the IWC site and adjacent propertieswill be identified and reviewed. The issues encountered whenremedial actions are performed on property not under IWC controlwill be analyzed for impact to the project by EPA.
Subtask R12.3.2 Perform Limited Field Survey
By subcontract» a limited field survey will be performed toverify features Identified in aerial photos and to establishbenchmarks for horizontal and vertical control.
Subtask RJ2.3.3 Prepare, Site Hans.
Through EPA's £as Vegas mapping service, two topographic sitebase maps will be prepared. The base maps will be developed fromaerial photographs take:; and field surveys. Proposed locationsof groundwater monitoring wells, suspected areas of contamination3t,d benchmarks may be Indicated on site with markers suitable insize and shape to be seen in photograph at scale. A topographicbase map of site will be prepared on mylar at a scale of 1" s SOfeat with 2 foot contour intervals, A baae nap of the site andimmediate vicinity will be prepared at a scale of 1" ss yo0 feetwith 5 foot contour interval. The large scale base map will beplaced on mylar and will cover an area skewed to the north of thesite
III-2
IWC WP11/9/84
000898
TASK RI2.A. ESTABLISH SITE SAFETY FACILITIES.
Subtask RI2.4.1 Schedule FIT Mobile_Van/Rent Storage Space.
BEFIT will schedule and provide an equipped mobile van for theremedial investigation activities. The van will containsampling, decontamination and general site safety equipment.Additional temporary storage space may be rented to storematerials which cannot be kept in the on-site van.
Subtask RI2.4.2 Rent, Special Safety,Equipment.
So special safety or decontamination equipment requirements areanticipated at this time. However, special decontaniinatiOD andsafety equipment required which ia not available from EPA orowned by B&V, CH2H or EEFIT will be rented, leased or purchased, c^
00Subtask RI2.4.3 Secure Site. .• • - — •" •• r~-
By subcontract, a four-wire barb wire fence will be installed *'"around the site perimeter and warning signs posted. The new 0fence will tie into the existing fence on the north side of the site and an existing, partial fence along the east perimeter.The existing east fence will be repaired as necessary under thissubcontract.
Site security for the drilling equipment and temporary storage ofproject gear will be a requirement of that subcontract.
RX2.5. UPDATE WORK PLAN AND PREPARE SITE DESCRIPTION.
Subtask RI2.5.1 Update, Work Plan.
Based on the evaluation of additional information gathered duringthe data collection, site visit and site map preparation tasks,the work plan will be updated. The areas tvhere additionalinformation is required will be identified and the work plan forthe Phase I site investigation and subsequent tasks will bemodified accordingly.
Eubtask RI2.5.2 Prep3re__Site_Description
Based on additional data obtained during Activity RI2.0, anupdated site description will be prepared by EEFIT modifying thedescriptions included in the RAMP. This description will beprepared in a format suitable for direct incorporation in thfiRemedial Investigation Report. Copies of the description will bemade available to thfi project staff and the RSPO.
IWC WPi]R2£V 1/25/8A
000899
TASK RI2.6 ^E iI_^ MINARy_REMEDIALJECHNOLOGIES.
Review potential remedial technologies that could be implemented atthe Industrial Waste Control Site, prior to initiating site studies.Any prior responses taken or attempted by the operator or governmentagencies will be considered. The objectives are to identify sourcecontrol and offsifce remedial technologies that are reasonable for thissite and to direct the site investigations so they provide the datanecessary to develop and evaluate these technologies. Basic remedialaction alternatives to be considered will include onsite containment,onaite treatment and offsite disposal. These alternatives may beconsidered singularly or in coabxnation.
Periodic review of field results will be completed to reconsiderpractical technologies and to fine-tune data collection activities.Data will be reviewed as it becomes available and additional appli"cable technologies will be considered as the data warrants. v
0^^
ACTIVITY RI3.0 - PHASE I SITE INVESTIGATIONS v-©
Phase I site investigations will be conducted to assist in character!- ^
zing the site and in defining actual or potential public health and envi-
ronmental hazards. These investigations will gither additional site data,
determine physical site and waste characteristics, and determine if migra-
tion of contaminants from the site hail occurred or has the potential to
occur. The investigations will be primarily focused on the geology and -
hydrogeology of the site, on the characteristics of the wastes disposed, on
the chemical quality of groundwater, surface water and sediments, and on
the ecological impacts of the site on the •urrounding area*
The scope of the Phase I investigation is based on the best available
information. The scope and extent will be continually reappraised during
field activities and the scope modified tf necessary to provide more mean-
ingful or complete data,
m-4IWC WP1
REV 1/25/84
000900
The geological investigations required to determine the potentialhazards posed by the site and the major pathways which may exist foroff site migration of contaminants include mine working investigations,aerial photo interpretation and geologic reconnaissance, and sub-surface borings*
Subtask RI3.1.1 Investigate Historical Mining Activities.
Geologists on the project staff (EE?IT and B&V) will cooperate inthe collection and assessment of this data.
1. Collect Additional Mine Maps.
By contacting the Arkansas Geologic Commission ana' miningfirms, additional maps and literature defining the scope and ^_methods of surface and underground nine operations will be -^collected and reviewed. This will be undertaken concurrent-ly with subtask R 1 2 . 1 . 1 .
Interview Mine Personnel.2.
Identify, contact and int=rviaw people familiar with mineworkings.
Perform Onaite Roconnaiaaanca and Survey.3.
Attempt- to identify and locate pertinent nine features in alimited field survey. This will be done In conjunction withsubtask RI3.1.2.
Subtask RI3.1.2 Interpret Aerial Photos.
1 . Review Aerial Photos.
The EPA la presently obtaining currfcflt and historical aerialphotos for project staff review and analysts* Ths photoswill be studied for evidence o; potential contaminant trans-port pathways by examining for the presence of majorgeologic features such as faultsi folding, aod joints, areasof groundvater discharge. Areas of subsidence or otherfeatures associated with the nearby underground nines willalso be determined.
2- J'^gform ^ield Geolofe^c Survey.
A Umi-bed geologic field reconua.issancd survey will beundertaken after the photo interpretation anu miuiag revieware completed, bo verify features identified in the priorstudies and to note general surficial geologic conditions.
0<—t
111-5
IVC WP11/9/84
000901
Subtask KI3.1.3 Perform Subsurface Jtnvestigatiqn.
1. Conduct Conductivity/Resistivity .Surveys.
Conductivity/resistivity surveys will be performed to locateanomalies which could potentially indicate the lateral andvertical extent of contaminant plunie(s) emanating from thesite» if existent. Secondary targets include the buriedhigh wall of the strip mine, bedrock fracture zones, anddeep mine workings. Survey results will be used to helplocate monitoring wells in a more cost-effective manner. Asubcontractor will conduct the surveys.
A total of approximately 5 kilometers of electromagnetic(EM) conductivity profiles will be obtained from the areasto the north, nortb-northweat and north-northeast of thesite, extending to the vicinity of Prairie Creek. GeonicsEM51 and EM3^-3 Terrain Conductivity meters will be used, c\i
giving exploration depth intervals of about 0-20 feet. 0-50 0s
feet and 0-100 feet. (*-v-
Vertical electrical soundings (VES) utilizing the Schlum- ^berger array will be conducted at aix offsite locations,The VES will ba used to determine the distribution of re"BiaLlvlt les to depths of 100-200 feet. This will aid ininterpretation of the EH data.
Isoresistivity maps prepared from EM survey data will beused to interpret anomalous areas. These anomalies will becorrelated with existing site data, such as mine (Daps andborehole logs, to identify the anomaly sources and toprovide input for locating monitoring wells.
2- Drill Deep Borings.
By subcontract, under the direction of EEFIT, two (2) deepborings will initially be drilled. The first deep boringwill be drilled north of the site. The boring will bedrilled through the Lover Hartshorne coal bed or to a depthof 250 feet. The second deep boring located on the routhsite perimeter, will be drilled to a depth of 150 feet. Theborings will be made by the rotary drilling method usingwater or compressed air with 1DC coring in the underlyingbedrock. The location of these two (2) borings are shown onFigure 1. The borings will be developed as 2 inch aoaitor-iog wells as described in Task R-I3.2.2.
Dovnhole geophysical logging (gamma, SP and reaiativity)will be aaed in each hole. The geophysical scale readingswill be correlated to known stratigraphy of the core to
111-6
IWC WPlBEV 1/25/84
000902
INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTftfot SITEPROPOSED BORINO ANO MONITORING
WELL LOCATIONS
FIGURE I
000903
provide a basis for interpreting further geophysicalmeasurements in Phase I and II borings. The geophysicallogging will be a requirement of the drilling subcontract.
Two (2) additional deep borings (average depth of 200 feet)i/ill be made north of the site into the old underground nineworkings based on the results of the geophysical study andthe mining activities investigations. These borings will bemade by the rotary method but will not be cored. Theborings will be geophysically logged. These borings will bedeveloped as 4 inch monitoring wella under Task RI3.2.2.
The north, deep borings will provide information to definethe gradient> flow direction anJ water quality in the deepaquifer. The south, deep boring is required to establishbackground water quality as well as to provide informationon aquifer continuity across the site. ,a-
prill SbalLowJBoriogs.
Under the aame subcontract following completion of the deep '"boringsi four (4) shallow borings will be drilled to a depth 0of about 50 feet. Borings vill be made by the rotary drill- ing method usiog water or compreaaed air. Three boringsvill be located along the northern perimeter of the site,down gradient from the fill area. The fourth boring will belocated along the southern perimeter of the aile, up gradi-ani from the fill area. The proposed locationi of thesefour borings are shown on Figure 1.
The purpose of the shallow boring program is to determinetb« gradient , flow direction and water quality in the upperaquifer. *
Sample Soi^ and Bedrock During Borings.
Sfliapleb of uncoosolidated matariala or overburden soils willbe taken at five-foot intervals or obvious strata changesfor analysis. Samples will be taken first from deep boringswhere adjacent ahallow wells are installed. Sampling in theadjacent shallow well will be done only in aelected inter-vals to augment the deep bore sample. The soil character-istics/types will be logged by the geologist. Samples willbe tested for degree of contamination, liquid limit, plasticlimit, plasticity index, and particle size analysis.Samples will be field scanned using a HNV photoiooizer forpresence of volatile or^anics. Sacplea exhibiting highvolatile organic levels will be packaged and shipped to thelaboratory (CLP) for analysis. Composite sanaplex will beprepared of the other material for analysis.
III-?
IVC WP1S2V 1/25/84
000904
Samples will be placed in 8 ounce, clear glass bottles withteflon-lined caps and will be properly labeled, sealed,packaged and shipped to the laboratory (CLP) for analysis.When the underlying sedimentary bedrock is encountered inthe two initial deep borings, continuous core samples willbe retrieved to final depth. Bedrock core samples will becarefully logged and used to define subsurface stratigraphy,structure of the rock and rock quality designation. Bedrocksamples will also be tested using a HNU photoionizer forpresence of volatile organic contaminants.For budgetary purposes, it is assumed that 14 samples willbe forwarded for laboratory analysis of priority pollutantorganics and Task 1 , 2, and 3 inorganics (see. Appendix C ) ,and 14 samples will be forwarded to the laboratory to estab"lish physical properties of the materials, U
ChThe four shallow boreholes will have falling head in-situ -permeability tests conducted after casing and screening byfilling each hole with water and measuring the water level versus time relationship.All drilling will be done in compliance with EPA and otherapplicable regulations. Drilling equipment will be decon-taminated between borings, And sampling equipment will bedecontaminated between sample retrieval.
TASK RI3.2. HmOGEQLOGIC INVESTIGATION
A hydrogeologic study will be cooducted to evaluate the occurrence,direction and rate of flow of groundwater in the vicinity of the Bite,the potential contamination of groundwater in the vicinity of thesite, and the current use of groundwater in the area.
Sublaak RI3 .2 .1 Conduct, Survey of Private _Wells..
1- Review Public..Records.
Review public records for the presence and use of privatewells within a 1-fflile radius of the IWC site.
2* Cond_uct_ Su rvey.
Conduct door-to-door survey within 1/2 mile semicircle northof site. The location, type, and use of wells, and thenumber of persons using each well as a potable water sourcewill be identified. The survey rosy be extended during PhaseII remedial investigation activities based on the results ofthe Phase I investigation.
III-8
000905
Subtask RI3.2.2. Develop Monitoring Wells.Each of the eight (8) borings drilled (under subtask R I 3 . 1 . 1 )will be developed as a monitoring well. The four (4) shallowborings will be developed as 2 inch diameter monitoring wells.The 2 inch size is suited to the preliminary investigativeobjective for these wells. The two (2) initial deep borings willalso be developed as 2 inch wells. The 2 inch size meets theinvestigative objective and is cost effective since the under-lying bedrock ia these holes is cored and sampled. The two (2)additional deep borings into the mine workings will be developedas 4 inch wells. The 4 inch si2e provides the desired monitoringfunction and allows aquifer evaluation by pumping during Phase IIinvestigations or ultimate remedial measures.Casing will be flush jointed, Schedule 40 PVC (Schedule 80 for4 inch, deep wells). A PVC cap with a hook to bold a bailer will \0be supplied for each well. The PVC casing will be protected by a Clarger diameter steel casing with lockable cap and cement benton- r-ite sealed to prevent runoff entry down the annulus. The zones ,„to be screened (0.03 inch minimum size) and developed will be —determined in the field based on results of the drilling. Thewells will be developed by surging and pumping. Well completionwill be in accordance with EPA and applicable .state and localregulations. The well casing and ground surface elevations willbe established by field personnel from bench darks establishedunder Subtask R I 2 . 3 . 2 .
Subtask RI3.2.3 Sample _and Analyze Ground Water.Under this task, groundwater samples will be taken from both themonitoring wells that were installed under subtask RI3.2.2 and -existing wells in the area of the site. All samples will besubjected to proper chain-of-custody procedures, and afterlabeling, packaging» and completion of the paperwork, will beshipped to the appropriate EPA Contract Laboratory for prioritypollutant organic and inorganic Tasks 1 , 2 and 3 analyses. (SeeAppendix C ) . Subsequent review of the analytical data mayprovide information that allows revision of the number of anal-ytical tests that need to be conducted under Phase II activities.This task assumes sampling of eight (8) new monitoring wells andfour existing domestic wells identified in Task R I 3 . 2 . 1 . Theeight (8) new wells will be sampled a second fciinei approximatelytwo weeks after the initial sampling while the field saropliagteam is still mobilized. Sampling of the wells will be accom-plished by using the baler dedicated to each well. Prior toactual sampling, the static water level in each monitoring wellwill be measured. Three to five well volumes will then be purgedfrom each monitoring well prior to actual sampling. Fieldffleasurements will include pH, temperature, and specificconductance.
III-9
IWC WP1REV 1/25/84
000906
A groundwater sample will also be analyzed from the artesian wellsouth of Bonanza Road and approximately 1/4 mile west of thesite. A groundwater sample vill also be collected and analyzedfrom a second artesian well when and if its location can beidentified. The approximate discharge volume and depth of thesewells will be estimated at the time of sampling.
Ground water samples for priority pollutant analysis will beplaced in the proper containers for shipment to the laboratory.For extracfcable organics, one-half gallon amber glass bottleswith teflon-lined screw caps will be used. Forty millilitervials with teflon screw caps will be used for volatile organics,and for metals and inorganics analysis, one liter high-densitypolyethylene bottles will be used to contain the samples. Dupli-cate samples will be taken on approximately 10 to 20 per cent ofthe samples. It is assumed that the ground water samples willall be low level hazard samples so no special shipping require-ments will be necessary and that a total of 24 samples (8 new ^wells initially, 8 new wells second sampling, 4 existing wells, 2 0^artesian wells, 2 duplicates) are taken, f^.
^_.After proper sample preservation within the above mentioned con- ^t-ainers, the paperwork for chain-of-custody and for analyticaltesting will be completed. Sample tags, sample seals, inorganicand organic t raff ic reports, chaio-of-custory records and samplereceipt forms will be filled out. The sample containers willthen be packed to minimize breakage during shipment and shippedto the appropriate contract laboratory for analysis.
Analytical procedures for the ground water samples vill conformto the guidelines of the U.S. ERA Contract Laboratory Program.Review of the data generated from laboratory analysis may yieldrevisions in the list of parameters necessary for subsequent -laboratory analysis. It is assumed that any further sampling andanalysis will be conducted under Phase II.
Field blanks will be prepared at the time of sampling and sub-mitted with the samples taken from the monitoring wells. Fieldblanks will consist of laboratory prepared blank water in theappropriate containers.
TASK RI3.3. CHARACTERIZE OT-SITE WASTE
In order to characterize the cover material on the landfill and deter-mine the nature of wastes buried in the landfill site, an on-sifcesampling program will be conducted that utilizes geophysics, soilborings and laboratory analyses to establish the level and extent ofcontamination at the site.
III-10
IWC WP11/9/84
000907
Subfcask RI3.3.1 Extend Magnetometer Survey.To minimize potential exposure to field personnel and potentialoff-site migration of the contaminants during the waste sampling,the magnetometer and conductivity surveys taken in May of 1983will be reviewed and extended. This will allow location ofsampling points that will minimize potential for encounteringburied drums.The initial magnetometer survey ended at the existing north fenceline because access to the north could not be obtained at thattime. To establish the possible extent of waste material to thenorth, the magnetometer grid will be expended north ninety feet(3-30 foot grids). The two adjacent grids used in the earliersurvey will be reestablished and resurveyed as a control. A mapwill be prepared incorporating the results of both the originaland new surveys. The map will overlay the site map prepared in Task RI2.3. _0
Subtask RI3.3.2 Perform _Subsur_face Inye.stiga tion. r 's—
The cover material and characteristics of shallow waste will be ©sampled by drilling four holes as deep as possible (10' to 1 5 ' ) /-using a two-man, powered portable auger. The approximate loca-tion of the borings are ahown in Figure 1 . Final locations willbe determined in the field when the magnetometer survey grid hasbeen reestablished to avoid area of high metallic concentration.The material will be sampled with a hand driven split-spoonsampler.Based on the results of the magnetometer survey and the portableauger investigation, one to three (3) borings will be drilledinto the waste material. These borings will be angered through 'the waste and disturbed material to the natural material beneaththe waste (approximately 3 0 ' ) . A continuous flight auger will beused for these borings if possible. Xf not successful, a hollow-stem auger will be used. Following sampling of the naturalmaterial beneath the waste, the natural Riafcerial strata will beresealed with a cement, bentonite mixture. The location for theborings will be selected in the field based on the results of theprevious en-site work
Subtask RI3.3.3 Sample Subsurface MaterialsWaste samples will be taken with a split-spooa sampler at five*foot intervals if possible. A soil sample will also be taken ofthe natural material If encountered in each hole. Waste sampleswill be field scanned using a HNU photoionisEer for the presenceof volatile organics. Samples exhibiting high volatile organiclevels or other visual evidence of contamination will be packaged
ni-nIVC WP11/9/84
000908
and shipped to the laboratory (CLP) for analysis. Compositesamples will'be prepared of the other material. Samples will beplaced in 8 ounce, clear glass bottles with teflon-lined caps andwill be properly labeled, sealed, packaged and shipped to thelaboratory for analysis. The laboratory analysis will includepriority pollutant organics and inorganics Tasks 1 , 2 and 3 (seeAppendix C ) . As with the ground water samples, review of theanalytical data may result in revision of apalytical parametersfor Phase II.For planning and budgetary purposes it is assumed that ofthirteen (12 samples, 1 duplicate) soil samples will be taken andanalyzed in this work effort. Field blanks will be prepared atthe time of sampling and submitted with the subsurface samples inaccordance with the QAPP and sampling plan.Each of the three (3) 30 foot borings will be developed as a 2inch diameter monitoring well as described ia Subtask RI3.2.3. A <y\water sample will be taken from each well, packaged and analyzed as other groundwater samples described in Subtask RI3.2.3. f-
TASK RI3.4. COKDUCT SURFACEWATER AND,. SgPnffiHT INVESTIGATION
This task will delineate surface hydrological features of the site andimmediate surrounding area and also provide information relating tocontamination of surface water bodies near the site.
Sunace drainage pathways at the site will be delineated through fieldreconnaissance and review of existing data such as topographic naps.The surface drainage features include springs, seeps, standing water,artesian wells, drainage ditches and ponds. The location ^nd mappingof such surface drainage features will take place in the springtimewhen there is more water on the site and such surface features will bemore readily apparent.
Surface water samples will be taken at the following locations:
o Prairie Creek, one upstream of the site and one downstream(2). The approximate volume of flow in Prairie Creek will beestimated at the time of sampling.
o Farm pond on Heason property (5) .
o Liquid filled depression approximately 1/4 mile east of thesite (I),
o Liquid filled depression northeast of the site behind thedark's Seamless Guttering building (1).
III-12
0/-\
000909
Surface water aamplcs will be placed in the appropriate containers asdescribed earlier for analysis of extractable organics, volatileorganics, metals, and other inorganics and pesticides.
>Soil/sediment saiaples will be taken at the following locations:
o At all locations of surface water sampling.(5)o Old leachate seeps downgradient of old site impoundment. (2)o East and west primary surface drainage ditches. (2)o Stain in southwest corner of site. ( 1 )
io Upgradient ditch sample. (1 )
Soil/sediment samples will be placed in 8 ounce, clear glass jars with oteflon-lined caps. It is anticipated that these samples will be either low or medium concentration samples. A HKU photoionizer will beused to determine the presence of volatile organics in the soil/sediment samples. Sample containers will be packaged to preventbreakage and all necessary paperwork such as chain-of-custody docu" 0ments and sample tags will be completed and properly affixed before shipment to the laboratory. Laboratory analyses will be conducted forthe parameters as described under Subtaak R1 3 . 2 . 3 .
CO
Additional surface water and soil/sediment sample requirements will beidentified based on the results of the field screening and Phase Ilaboratory analysis. Based on the field screening, a limited nuioberof additional saiaples may be taken during Phase I activities. Forbudgetary purposes, two (2) additional surface water and two addi-tional soil/sediment samples are assumed io locations Identifiedduring the Phase I work.Field blanks will be prepared at the time of sampling and submittedwith the surface water and sediment samples in accordance with theQAPP and sampling plan.The Phase II sampling program, if required, will be based on theresults of the Phase 1 laboratory analysis.
TASK 1U3.5. COMPUCT ECOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONA general ecological survey of the site and surrounding vicinity willbe conducted to assess environmental impacts resulting from the migra-tion of contaminants from the site. The vegetative communities andassociated animal populations will be characterized and adverseimpacts on those biotic components will be assessed. Special atten-tion will be paid to areas of stressed vegetation, especially the de-idtrees that are located north of the site boundary.
III-13
IWC WP11/9/84
000910
Existing inf creation concerning the biotic communities in the areawill be reviewed prior to the site survey. This information includesexisting aerial photographs, vegetation an<? animal studies, and inter-views with the Arkansas Fish and Game Commission, the t." S. WildlifeService, the Audobon Society, and local citizens.
A stream survey in Prairie Creek will be conducted to provide qualita-tive information on benthic organisms, fish, and instream habitats.Integration of the Murfaca liydrology studies and the stream studiesmay reveal any direct afldcts resulting from the migration of con-taminants from the site into frfle stream.
The results of these field investigations will provide informationto characterize adverse environmental impact resulting from the site.This information will also be used in the development and evaluationof remedial action alternatives.
TASK RI3.6. ANALYZE DATA AND PREPARE REPORT (DRAFT) 000
Data f"oro the Phase 2 investigations will be presented in a draft ,-report prepared by EEj-17. This report will document the nature and Qextent of contamination at the site and present a scope of work for ^any required Phaae II investigations.
All data obtained during the site investigations will be tabulatedand presented in a form that is easily readable and understandable.These data will include the results of the geologic and hydrogeologicinvestigations, the air photo reconnaissance, the mine investigations,well surveys, saapling of monitoring wells, sampling and analysis ofenvironmental media and the ecological investigation. Analytical datawill be tabulated and presented along with descriptions of proceduresused to collect and analyze the data. -
The data will be analyzed to provide a description of the natureand extent of contamination at the site. The report will document thegeneral distribution of contaminants on the site and describe anymigration off-site through surface and ground wafr systems. Thereport will also provide baseline data to support the feasibilitystudy.
The results of the Phase I investigations will be used to determine ifany data gaps still exist for the feasibility study. The Phase IIinvestigations will be designed to fill in the gaps. The Phase IIinvestigations will be discussed in the report and a scope of work andschedule will be presented.
The draft report will be submitted to CH2M and EPA for review andapproval prior to beginning the Phase II investigations or feasibilitystudy. One of tha project meetings identified in Task RI6.0 will bescheduled to discaas the study results and/or report review comments.
III-14
IWC WP1REV 1/25/84
000911
ACTIVITY RI4.0 " PHASE II INVESTIGATIONSThe scope and sequence of Phase II Site Invastigstiuns will be deter-
ained at the conclusion of the Phase I Investigations. The Phase Hinvestigations will be conducted ocly if Phase I investigations determinethat the IWC site poses significant hazards or if the data generated inPhase I is inadequate for developing ind evaluating remedial action alter-natives. The actual number of samples, types u< analyses and cost ofadditional recommended field investigations can only be defined at theconclusion of Phase I activities. However, a proposed Phase II program is"
0presented at this time to describe anticipated areas of study and provide 00an estimate of cost. 0
/-sThe following task descriptions were developed for the "/ork plan onthe assumption that groundwater contamination and limited surface contami-nation (on^site, some ponds but not Prairie Creek) was discovered duringthe Phase I investigation. On this basis, the purpos? of the Phase IIinve^-igations will be to identify and quantify to the degree possible thefollowing:
o Further define extent and degree of groundwater contamination.both aereal and vertical.
0 Estimate rate at which the contaminant plume is moving.
o Further evaluate the hydrologic pathway connecting groundwaterand surface waters and the potential for cross contamination.
o Attempt to quantify the amount, extent and characteristics ofcontaminated source material.
This additional data will provide the information required to effectively
analyze remedial alternatives during the feasibility study.
III-15
IWC WP1REV 1/25/84
000912
TASK RI4.1. CONDUCT GEOPHYSICAL JSURVEYS.
Based on the results of Phase 1 Geological and Hydrogeological Investi-gations, including Phase I EM and VES surveys the cost-effectivenessof further geophysical surveys for Phase II investigations will beevaluated. The geophysical techniques considered wili. include:
o EM profiling
o EM transient soundings
o Seismic refraction/reflection
o Microgravity
Survey targets might include contaminant plume(s), bedrock fracturezOties or faults, deep mine workings, and strip mine (Xandfill) confi-tr\
guration. 0
COA subcontractor will conduct the geophysica.1 surveys. For planning,-purposes, the sc^pe of the additional surveys ia assumed to include ^3 km of multilevel EM profiling and 15 £11 transient soundings. ^RTA t /'•mmnf"" /" - - - - - - - - • -TASK R I 4 . 2 . CONDUCT GEOLOGICAl INVESTIGATIONS.
Phase II geological invectigat JDS, if required, will include addi-tional borings to further define subsurface conditions at the IWCSite, with an emphasis on conditions relevant to development, evalua-tion, and possible design of remedial action alternatives. It isassumed that three additional shallow borings, to a depth of approxi-mately 50 feet, and three additional deep borings, (150* to 250' tocoal seflffl), will be required to further define subsurface conditions,
Borir.gs will be drilled and sampled following similar procedures asfor Phase I borings (see Subtask RI3.1.3). The deep holes will bedrilled using the rotary drilling method and geophysically logged. Theshallow holes will be rotary drilled but not geophysically logged.
Samples will be taken at five-foot intervals or obvious strata changesfor analysis ad described in Subtask RI3.1.3, Item 4. ?or budgetarypurposes, it is assumed that 14 samples (13 samples, 1 duplicate) willbe forwarded for analysis of priority pollutant organics aad Task 1, 2and 3 inorgaaics (See Appendix C). Since the physical properties ofthe subsurface materials will have been established during Phase Iinvestigations, only two (2) additional physical properties analysisare assumed for Phase II.
III-16
IWC WPl1/9/84
000913
Field blanks will be prepared and subro .tted in accordance with theQAPP and sampling plan.
Boring locations will be determined after the completion of Phase Iinvestigations.
TASK RI4.3. PERFORM, HTORQGEOLQGICAL IMVESTIGATIOHS.
Phase II groundwater studies, if required, will include the installa-tion, sampling, and testing of additional monitoring wells includingwells located in the abandoned underground mines, where possible.These wells will be used to further delineate the level and extent ofgroundwater contamination and to define whether or not the undergroundmines are hydraulically connected to aquifers identified in Phase I.These data will be used for evaluation of remedial actionalternatives, ^f
Phase XI will include the installation and testing of two additional2-inch-diameter (one deep, one shallow) and four 4-inch~diameter(2 deep, 2 shallow) monitoring wells to provide a more complete cover- T"age of groundwater flows and quality than Phase I. The two inch wells ©will provide information on hydraulic gradients, subsurface geology /"'>and water quality at a reasonable cost. The 4 inch wells will alsoallow the evaluation of aquifer characteristics such as transmisslvity,storage coefficient And drawdown characteristics in each aquifer.
Locations of wells will be based on Phase I findings. New wells willbe installed and developed following the same procedures used in PhaseI. oampling procedures will also be the same and the same chemicalparameters will be analyzed. Samples will be taken from each wellafter the well has stabilized. All sampling and testing will conformto the guidelines established for the EPA Contract tab Program.
A second sampling and analysis of the wells identified or installedduring Phuse I (Subtask RI3.2.3) will be performed to identifyseasonal changes in groundwater levels, degree of contamination, etc.The analysis will also be performed through the CLP, The extent of thePhase II laboratory analysis aay be reduced based ou the Phase Iresults. For budgetary and planning purposes it is assumed that atotal of 22 samples (34 original locations in Task 3.2.3, 6 new wellsand 2 duplicates) will be taken. Field blanks will be prepared andsubmitted in accordance with the QAPP and sampling plan.
A limited pump test will be made in two of the 4-inch wells (one deep,one shallow) to define aquifer caracteristics.
TASK RJ4.4. COyDUCT SimFACE WATER A^ SEPJ rr IKVgSn^ATIQy^^
Additional surface water and sediment investigations may be requiredto define the seasonal variability of previously sampled areas or toextend sampling coverage to areas not sampled during Phase I. For
IH-17
IWC WPl1/9/84
000914
example, areas downgradient of locations fo'md contaminated in Phase Iwould be candidates for the Phase II sampling. For budgetary andplanning purposes Phase II surface water and sediment samples will betaken at the following locations,
Surface Water
Prairie Creek (upstream)Prairie Creek (downstream)Liquid filled depression;Downgradient surface samplesLeachaLc seeps (wet season only)Duplicate Samples
The results of the laboratory analyses performed during Phase I willbe reviewed to determine appropriate analytical parameters for the °Phase II. It is assumed that a limited number of complete priority COpollutant analyses will be necessary and that specific inorganica and s-organics analyses will comprise the bulk of the laboratory investiga- Qtion. Additional laboratory analysis may also be considered to /-^further characterize the hazardous waste (eg. EP Toxicity,Ignifcability).
TASK RK.5. PERFORM QN"§ITE WASTE CHARACTER I ZATI ON
Depending on the results from the Phase I waste characterizationunder T:*;.., RI3.3, additional studies may be conducted in Phase II.
The Phase I studies will attempt to define the nature and types ofhazardous wastes located at the site. The additional Phase II oa-sifceinvestigations would further define these waste characteristics. Inaddition, the a real location and volume of contamination will beestimated. This information would allow refinement of remedial alter*natives should the contamination source be of limited extent, Abetter definition of any Phase XI waste characterization efforts willbe possible after the results of the Phase I study are received.However, for the purposes of this Work Plan development the on-siteactivities will consist of four (4) trench excavations at selectedareas.
The geophysical surveys will be reviewed to ainiaize the potential forboring into buried drums.
Soil and waste material wlii be sampled and shipped for analysis asdescribed in Task RI3.3. For budgeting purposes it is aasuraed that atotal of eight (8) waste aamples will be collected, shipped andanalyzed via tha CLP in thia work effort.
ill-18
IWC WFlSEV 1/25/84
000915
ACTIVITY RI5.0 - REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORTTASK RI5.1. Dgm REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORTOUTLINE.
An outline of the proposed report will be prepared by EEFIT for reviewby EPA and other project team members.
TASK RI5.2. REVIEW SCOPE OP REPORT.The results of the site studies will have been presented to CH2M HILLin the form of Interim Reports cr Task Memos at the conclusion of eachactivity. A meeting will be scheduled by CH2M HILL with the EPA,ADPCE, and other project team aembers. The meeting will serve as areview session of the site study results, of the proposed reportoutline and its scope, and of the viable remedial actions identified.
TASK RI5.3. PREPARE REMEDIAL. INVESTIGATION REPORT.»fl/
After the outline of the Remedial Investigation Report and report scope have been approved by EPA, the Report will be written by EEFIT. <"The Report will be written to meet the following objectives: 0
r~\o To identify the sources of contamination on the IWC site.o To determine the extent of contamination and describe the
pathways for contaminant migration off the site, if anyexist.
o To assess the potential impacts and hazards of contaminationon public health and the environment.
o To provide data for evaluation and selection of remedialaction alternatives.
o To provide information for selecting source controls, off-site measures or an appropriate combination. *
Twelve copies of a draft of the report will be submitted to CH2M HILLfoe distribution, review and comment. Comments from the variousreview agencies will be coordinated through CH2M HILL into one sub-aittal to EEFIT. A final report incorporating the comments receivedwill then be prepared.
ACTIVITY RI6.0 - PERFORM MANAGE^jg ACTIVITIES.During the course of the remedial investigations, the key project
management personnel (See Appendix B) will maintain control over thetechnical and financial progress of the project. The following tasks willbe performed to document this maintenance of control:
III-19IWC WP1
000916
TASK RI6.1. SUBMIT HQimg.Y PROJECT STATUS REPORTS.
Monthly technical and financial progress/status reports will be sub-mitted to ZPMO and EPA. Technical progress/status reports willidentify project tasks completed during the previous month, deviationsfrom planned progress, difficulties encountered and corrective f --ionsproposed to remedy deviations and overcome difficulties. Black &Veatch and EEFIT will make a telephone report concerning the technicalstatus at the end of each month to CH2M's SPM. The SPM will preparethe technical status report based on these reports.
The financial status report will include comparisons of proposedversus actual expenditures and projections of cost to completion.Variations in actual or projected costs will be explained. CH2H willprepare the project financial leport based on financial informationprovided by B&V and EEFIT The financial information shall includedthe previous month's invoice as well as projections for manpower andoexpenses for the next three months, r-^
TASK RI6.2. DOCUMENT^HLP^PROCEDURES.
All field sampling activities will be documented and the requiredchain-of-cusfcody procedures will be followed by EEFIT personnel. Sitesafety, quality assurance/ quality control, and standard operatingprocedures will be monitored to maintain the standards set for theproject.
TASK RI6.3. HAIKTAIM PROJECT'FILE.
Project files will be kept under lock and key with access limited onlyto authorized project personnel. Critical project communications willbe documented by letter* telephone memo, or other correspondence.
TASK RI6.4. ATTEM) MEETINGS.
The project team will schedule and attend all meetings required tomaintain or monitor project progress. For budget purposes, four(1984) progress meetings, one each in Kansas City, Fort Smith, Dallasand Denver are assumed during the remedial investigation phase. TheFort Smith meeting will be scheduled to coincide with RJ startupactivities. Other meetings such as the site visit (Task RI2.2) andreport review (Task RI5.2) are included under separate tasks.
TASK RI6.5. COORDINATE LOGISTICSLOQIEU) ACTIVITIES.
Subta.ik R16.5 .1 . Procure Subcontractors.
I. Sefine items of work to be subcontracted. Tentative itemsto be subcontracted include: geophysical surveys, sitefencing, soil borings, and monitoring well installations.
0^\
III-20
IWC WP1REV 1/25/84
000917
Aerial, ground surveys and topographic mapping will beobtained through EPA's Las Vegas mapping service.
2. Identify potential subcontractors to pc-rfona the work. Sub--contractors will be identified from existing lists of .sub-contractors at the ZPMO, and other sources including localbusiness directories» fcha Procurement Automated SourceSystem (PASS) operated by the Small Business Administration,previous business relationships and client contacts.
3. Develop work scope and prepare request for proposals.
4. Request proposals for required work activities.
5. Evaluate responses to the requests and evaluate subcon-^ tractor qualifications. 00
06. Award subcontracts (utilizing CH2M's BOA subcontractors if 00v-0f~\
appropriate) and mobilize the subcontractors.
7. Subcontract administration.
Subfcask RI6.5.2. Conduct .Sampling _and^Analysis.
1. EEHT will arrange for the analysis, inform the SMO of thetypes and numbers of analyses for each media sampled, andverify these can be handled through the Contract LaboratoryProgram (CLP) in a timely manner. Contracts may be arrangedwith private laboratories if the CLP cannot accommodate theanalyses scheduling required. For cost estimating it wasassumed that all chemical sample analyses will be done bythe CX.P.
2. EEFIT will also perform the following:
a. Obtain sample bottles, packaging and shippingmaterials,
o Contact CH2M and private supply houses formaterials not available through EPA.
o Purchase necessary preservation, packaging, andshipping materials.
b. Obtain necessary sample documents and materials.
o Chaia-of-custody tags and records from EPARegion 6.
o SMO Traffic Reports and labels.
III-2:
IWC WP1REV 1/25/84
000918
Obtain other necessary sampling materials and equipmentnot available in-house -or through subcontractors.o Identify material and equipment requirements.o Rent, lease or purcahse as appropriate.
Identify appropriate means of sample transport fronfield to laboratory. Package and ship the samples tothe laboratory designated by the SMO. Maintainrequired communications with the SMO from the periodprior to sampling through delivery "of sample analysesresults. os
0COt—0^
III-22
IWC WP1REV 1/25/84
000919
IV. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF FEASIBILITY STUDYThe Feasibility Study wil' *.ake the site data analyzed in the Remedial
Investigations and develop and k dluate reasonable remedial action alterna-tives. The most cost-effective alternative will be recommended to the EPAfor consideration. Following review and approval, a conceptual design willbe developed for the selected alternative and a final report will be pre-pared. The Feasibility Study will include the following activities:
Activity FS1.0 - Develop Potential Remedial Alternatives0^—
00v-0t~-\
Activity FS2.0 - Screen AlternativesActivity FS3.0 - Recommend and Conduct Additional Engineering Studies v-Activity FSA-0 - Technically assess and Evaluate the Alternatives 0
t~-\Activity FS5.0 - Prepare Preliminary ReportActivity FS6.0 - Prepare Conceptual DesignActivity FS7.0 - Prepare Final ReportActivity FS8.0 - Management ActivitiesThe potential and realistic remedial action alternatives, developed
from the work completed during the remedial investigation, will be listed.These alternatives will then be subjected to an initial screening-type
evaluation process. Based on economic, environmental and engineeringfeasibility criteria inappropriate and infeasible alternatives will beeliminated from further consideration. This screening will yield a refinedlist of remedial alternatives.
Additional studies, if required to evaluate the cost-effectiveness,reliability or coostructability of alternatives, will be conducted.
The screened remedial action alternatives will be refined and morefully developed. The developed alternatives will be assessed on detailed
IV-1IWC WP11/9/84
000920
engineering, envirootnental and economic criteria. The alternatives will be
ranked based on the technical assess" ^snts,
A preliminary report summarizing the technical assessment of alterna-
tives will then be prepared and submitted to SPA. The highest ranked
alternative will be recommended for implementation.
After the recommended alternative has been approved by the EPA, it
will be further defined through the development of a conceptual resign.
A final report summarizing the results of the feasibility study and
presenting the conceptual design of the selected remedial alternative will'7"T-
be prepared. The final report will also incorporate the EPA's reviewGO^_
comments on the draft report, and will document the decision process used/-,
for the selection of the preferred alternative.
The EPA will be kept informed of the feasibility study progress
through monthly reports and project meetings. Project management activi-
ties will also include maintaining quality assurance programs, and monitor-
ing staffing, budgets and staff performance.
The objectives of performing the Feasibility Study ^t the IWC site
include:
o Development of remedial action alternatives to control or elimi-nate the source(s) of contamination at the IWC Site and thecontaminants that may have migrated off the site.
o Evaluation of remedial action alternatives considering environ-mental effects, engineering feasibility and cost (cost-effectiveness).
Recommendation of the most cost-effective remedial action alfcerEa-Uve. The lowest cost alternative (of those evaluated) that is
IV-2
IWC WP11/9/84
000921
technologically feasible and reliable and that adequately pro-tects (or mitigates damage to) public health an^ the environmentshould be considered the cost-effective alternative.
o Preparation of a cbnceptua'i. design of ';he recommended remedialaction alteraative.
Black & Veatch will be prMaarily responsible for the feasibility
study. However, key personnel from EEFIT involved in the remedial investi-
gation phase of the work will participate in FS Activities 1 and 2. This
will provide continuity between the RI and FS and take advantage of their
first-hand experience gained during :he field work. /-n
T-
00s~0<^
IV-3
IWC WP11/9/84
000922
V . WORK PLAN ACTIVITIES FOR THE FEASIBILITY STUDY
The description of the tasks aad subtasks required to accomplish eachof the Feasibility Study (FS) activities is presented below.
ACTIVITY FS1.0 - DEVELOP POTENTIAL REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVESTASK FS1.1. DEFINE REMEDIAL ACTION.pBJECTlvES
Define specific remedial action objectives based on the informationcollected during the Remedial Investigation. Basic considerationswill include: (a) the existing and potential hazards to public healthand the environment; (b) the geographical extent of the hazardoussubstances, both lateral aad vertical; (c) the major pathways ofoffsite migration. K\
TASK FS1.2. IDENTIFY REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES „
Identify appropriate remedial technologies to use as a basis in tc"developing remedial alternatives. Proven technologies for handling, disposal, control, containment and treatment that have been success- fully implemented in similar instances will be considered.
TASK FS1.3. DEVELOP mgDIAL ALTERNATIVES
Develop specific remedial alternatives using the appropriate remedialtechnologies. The alternatives will ®eet the defined objectives insubtask 1 of this Activity. Alternatives may include either sourcecontrol or offsifce remedial actions, or both. Ba&ic alternatives suchas onsifce containment, onsite treatment and offsite disposal will be _developed. For example, cnsifce containment would entail the evalua-tion of the existing subsurface strata to preclude migration ofhazardous materials from the site, the potential Cor using groundwatercutoff walls ( e . g . slurry walls) and impervious surface capping ( e . g .clay caps or impermeable membranes). Onsite treatment could includegroundwater pumping, possibly in conjunction with a ground dter cutoffvail, in additioa to physical treataent. ( e . g . carbon adsfir^tion). Onsite treatment could also include excavation, Stabilization and re-placement of the waste in an encapsulated area on fi' £ ° . Offsifcedisposal would include developing an inventory of dispc.a) facilitiessuited to handle the contaminated materials ( e . g . deep .1 injectionfacilities), their locations and associated removal and «,ransport re-quirements. A no-action alternative will be considered if: ( I ) theother remedial actions present a greater health or environsientaldanger than DO action; (2) the results of the remedial invesfcigationindicate no existing or potential adverse public health or environ-mental effects; (3) the costs to implement the remedy is substantiallygreater than the resulting benefits; (4) an appropriate remedy istechnically unfeasible.
V-l
IWC WP11/9/84
000923
ACTIVITY FS2.0. " SCREEN ALTERNATIVES
TASK FS2.1. DEVELOP ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Develop technical, environmental, and economic criteria to assist inperforming an initial review of the remedial alternatives. Basiccriteria will include:
o Order-of^magnitude cost estimates consisting of capital andlifetime operational and maintenance costs, and the presentworth value of these costs.
o Resulting adverse public health or environmental effectsfrom implementation of the alternative.
o Reliability, effectiveness, implementability and technical .feasibility in meeting the defined objectives.
TASK FS2.2. SCREEN ALTERNATIVES 00
Initiate the screening process applying the criteria in the previous 0Task FS2.1. Alternativea costing substantially more than others, /-\those which pose significant public health or environmental problems,and those determined to be unreliable, ineffective, not implementableor technically infeasible will be eliminated from further considera-tion. Members of the project team, EPA and representatives of otherFederal, state, and local agencies may participate in thifi screeningprocess.
TASK FS2.3. PREPARE^SUMMARY
Prepare a technical memorandum summarizing the objectives defined i-n ""Activity 1 , the screening process and the criteria developed iu TaskFS2.1 above. The summary will list the alternatives not eliminatedduring the screening process. Submit the summary to CH2M for distri-bution to ERA and other Federal, state, and local agencies asappropriate.
ACTIVITY FS3.0. - RECQ^ENP AND ^CONDUCT ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING STUDIES.
TASK FS3.1. IDEm?TJ)ATA GAPS
Review the reiaedial investigation studies for all appropriate data.Field data deficiencies and data gaps pertinent to tne evaluation ofthe remaining remedial alternatives will be identified.
TASK FS3.2. IGEHTirL STUDIES SEEDED
Determine the need for laboratory or bench scale treatability andother studies to fully evaluate the regaining remedial alternatives.
V-2
IWC WPl1/9/84
000924
These may include studies to further determine reliability, applica-bilxty, constructability and costs. Prepare a memorandum listingrecommendations for additional engineering studies along with support-ing documentation and submit to EPA for review.
TASK FS3.3. PREPARE STUDY WORK PUNPrepare and submit a work plan for the additional studies based on theoutcome of EPA's review of the recommendations.
TASK FS3.4. PERFORM THE STUDIES AS APPROPRIATE.Based on the approved work plan the additional engineering studieswill be performed. For budgetary purposes an allowance of $15»000 hasbeen included for subcontractor performance of the special studies.
in•r"00ACTIVITY FS^O. - TECHNICALLY ASSESSAND EVALUATE THE ALTERNATIVES.
TASK FSA.l. DEVELOP ALTERNATIVES T"0
Develop each alternative in sufficient detail to allow comparative <^technical assessment. This task includes the following components:
o Refine the alternatives and specify major logistic, equip-ment and utility requirements. Use of established technolo-gies will be emphasized.
o Prepare a basic component diagram.o Define operation and maintenance/monitoring requirements.o Def-'ne implementation requirements including safety consid-
erations, regulatory and permit requirements, temporarystoraget offsite disposal and transportation.
o Prepare a conceptual site layout drawing.o Develop a schedule for implementation and address phasing
and segmenting options.o List potential adverse environmental Impacts, describe
methods to mitigate those impacts and costs of mitigation.o Prepare a preliminary opinion of probable costs associated
with the alternative including distribution of costs overtime.
TASK m.2. PERFORM DETAILED TECTfI CA^ ASSESSMENT OF^ALTERNATIVESPerform a comparative technical assessment of each alternative basedon accepted engineering, economic and environmental criteria.
V"3
000925
a. Determine the engineering implementability in terms of:
o Reliability
Established technology
Suitability to effectively control the site specific problem
0
ConsfcructabiUty and operability under site conditions
Onsite/offsitc disposal capacity
Transportationo
Determine the environmental ramifications as appropriate interms of:
b.
o Adverse impacts
o Effectiveness of mitigation measures
Adequacy of source control measureso
effectiveness of offsite control measureso
Institutional and legal constraints
Health and safety requirements
Evaluate the economic viability in terms of:c.
o Construction cost
o Operation and maintenance/monitoring costs
o Health and safety requirement costs
o Potential for cost escalation
o Present-worth analysis
TASK FS4.3. RA?fK_AI.TERMATIVgS
o
ttank the alternatives within each assessment category and theu developoverall rankings. Rankings will be based on all available data,professional judgement and experience with other hazardous wastesites. Meetings with CH2M H.TLL and others determined by CH2M HILLsuch as ERA and other Federal, state and local agencies and the publicif appropriate will be held to solicit input prior to final ranking ofthe alternatives
V-4
JWC WH1/9/84
000926
TASK FS4.4. PREPARE PRELIMINARY FS REPORT ^Aa outline of the FS report will be prepared by B&V for review by EPAand other project team members.Preliminary sections of the report will e drafted as in-house workingdocuments for internal review and review by project team members.These sections will follow the proposed outline and will document thefeasibility study procedures and technical development and ranking ofalternatives. The findings and recommendations will be developed.
.-^TIVITY FS5.0. - PREPARE DRAFT FS REPORT
TASK FS5.1. PREPARE DRAFT REPORT
A draft report will be prepared incorporating sections developed forthe preliminary report working document. The draft report will defineand provide a. basis for the recommended cost-effective alternative. c0
The report will summarize the information developed during the evalua- f"fcxon and assessment and will document that process. The report will 0incorporate comments from the internal review. f->
TASK FS5.2. SUBMIT THE DRAFT REPORT TO EPA (via CH2H HILL) FOR REVIEW AM)APPROVAL
TASK FS5.3. DEVELOP_COHPROMISE ALTERNATIVE
Develop a compromise alternative if EPA does not approve of the recom-mended alternative.
ACTIVITY FS6.0. - PREPARE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
TASK FS6.1. PREPARE WORK PLAN
Prepare a work plan which will allow the preparation of a conceptdesign consistent with the objectives of the recommended remedialaction.
TASK FS6.2. PREPARE ENGINEERING DESIGN
Prepare an engineering design including as appropriate.
o Conceptual plan view drawing of the overall site showinggeneral locations for project actions and facilities.
o Conceptual layouts (plan and cross-sectional views) asrequired for individual facilities, other items to beinstalled, or actions to be implemented.
V-5
IWC WP11/9/84
000927
o Conceptual design criteria and rationale.
o A description of types of equipment required, including.approximate capacity, size, and materials of construction.
o Process flow schematics and process descriptions.
A description of structural concepts for facilities.
Utility requirements and rationale.
An inventory of the required environmental permits andinstitutional requirements.
Operation, maintenance and monitoring requirements. CD
o Engineering approach, implementation schedule and overall °^project schedule. 'r"
0o Safety requirements and associated costs. <^-.
o Refined opinion of probable cost.
TnSK FS6.3. SUBMIT TO CH2H HILL FOR REVIEW.
The conceptual design will be submitted to CH2M for review prior toofficial submittal to EPA. Comments will be incorporated as appro-priate in the design.
TASK FS6.4. SUBMIT TO EPA FOR REVIEW.
ACTIVITY PREPARE FINAL REPORTTASK FS7.1. HEET WITH EPA
Meet with EPA to discuss the results of the feasibility study andcomments on the cooceputal design and to review the submitted data.
TASK FS7.2. PREPAY FINAL REPORT
The results of the feasibility study and conceptual design of theselected remedial alternative will be included. The report will alsoincorporate review comments received from EPA on the draft report anddocument the decision process used by the EPA and the project team forselection of the preferred alternative.
000928
During the course of the feasibility study, project management
personnel will maintain control over the technical and financial progress
of the project. The following tasks will be performed to document this
maintenance of control:
TASK FS8.1. SUBMIT MONTHLY PROJECT STATUS _REPORTS.
Monthly technical and financial progress/status reports will be sub-mitted to - 2PMO and EPA. Technical progress/status reports willidentify project tasks completed during the previous month, deviationsfrom planned progress, difficulties encountered and corrective actions o\proposed to remedy deviations and overcome difficulties. Black & ^_Veatch and BEFIT will make a telephone report concerning the technical „status at the end of each month to CHZM's SPM. The SPM will preparethe technical status report based on these reports. ^~
0The financial status report will include comparisons of proposed ^versus actual expenditures and projections of cost to completion.Variations in actual or projected costs will be explained. CH2M willprepare the project financial report based on financial informationprovided by B&V and EEFIT. The financial information shall includethe previous month's invoice as well as projections for manpower andexpenses for the next three months.
TASK FS8.2. ATTEND roOJECT MEETINGS
Project team personnel will attend all project review meetings re-quired by EPA or state agencies. For budgetary purposes, two projectmeetings, both in Kansas City are assumed during the Feasibility Studyphase. Other meetings such as the meeting for draft report review(Task FS7.2.) are included under separate tasks.
TASK FS8.3. MAINTAIN PROJECT FILE
Project files will be kept under lock and key with access United onlyto authorized project personnel. Critical project communications willbe documented by letter, telephone oiemo» or other correspondence.
V-7
000929
VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following project schedules have beea developed based on present
available information. The schedule will be adjusted during the course of
Lhe project to provide a graphic description of project progress and future
activities.
Two schedules have been prepared. The Remedial Investigation schedule
is shown on Figure 2. The schedule indicates Project Startup activities
beginning in November 1983, followed by the Phase I Remedial Investigation0
(RI) beginning in February 1984. The schedule assumes that a second phase C\J
investigation. Phase II, is required. This investigation would start
immediately following the compilation and analysis of the Phase I results. ^/•-
Figure 3 shows the Feasibility Study (FS) schedule. The proposed
schedule assumes the FS could begin after the Phase II RI startup activi-
ties and b6 partially performed simultaneously with the Phase II investiga-
tions. Based on this assumption the FS could be concluded approximately
three months after the final Phase II RI report is completed. ,
It is possible that the initial remedial investigation will produce
adequate information to evaluate remedial action alternatives without a
second stage investigation. If this occurs, the FS schedule would be
advanced an addi&ional one to two months to start in conjunction with the
completion of the Phase I RI Report.
VI-1
IWC WP1REV 1/25/84
000930
000931
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT STARTUPASSEMBLE PROJECT TERM
COLLECT REVIEW BACKG^GUN^ DATAPREPARE QA PLANS
PREPARE SITE H & S PLANS
IDENTIFY PROJECT GOALS 1 '
PREPARE WORK PLANREMEuIAL INVESTIGATION
COLLECT AND REVIEW ADDITIONAL D A T AINITIAL SITE V I S I T
PREPARE SITE TOPO MAP
ESTABLISH S : T f c SAFETY F A C I L I T I E S
UPDATE WORK PLA\/PRE:PARE SHE riESCRIPT ] Of,-;DE.ST]Fv P R E ^ i M ; \ ^ ^ ^ REMLCJr.L T£Ci-1 .P^ASE I INVES^CPTrONS
I N V E S T I G A T E HIS"IO^:C:A_ M:S;\3 A C T I V I T I E SINTER^^ET ABR:AL ^"CTCS
PERFORM SUBSURFACE : N V E S T I G A T I O N
HYDROGECLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS
CHARACTERIZE ON-SITE HAZARDOUS ^ASTESURFACE HATER ANO SEDIMENT INVESTIGATIONCONDUCT ECOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORT - PHASE 1
PHASE I; INVESTIGATIONS
GEOLOGICAL INVESTi-GATTONS
HVOROGEOLOGiCAL INVESTIGATIONSSURFACE MATER AND SEDIMENJ INVEST.WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
DRAFT RI REPORT OUTLINE - PhftSE 1 1
REVIEW RI REPORT SCOPE - PHASE II
PREPARF RI REPORT - PHASE II
000932
000933
1 V7~~~C^5 ~CS"~~^~ ' "CT
INDUSTRIAL MASTE CONTROL SITEPROJECT SCHEDUU. (CON'T)
FEASIBILITY S'UDYTASK NO.
FS1 .3
FSI.2FS1.3
FS2.1FS2.2
FS2.3
FS3.0
FS4.1FS4-2FS4,3
FS5.1FS5.3
FSB.tFS6.2
FS7.0
FS8.0
DESCRIPTION
nrFINE REMEDIAL ftCTION OBJECTIVES •
IDENTIFY REMEOIftL TECHNOLOGIES
DEVELOP REMEDIAL RLTERNRTIVES
DEVELOP ASSESSMENT CRITERlfl
PREPARE SUMMflRYSCREEN RLTERNRT1VES
RECOMMEND/CONDUCT RDD. ENGR. STUDIES
DEVELOP ftLTERNftTIVESPERFORM TECHNICAL flSSESSMENTRftNK ftLTERNflTIVES
PREPARE PRELIMINARY REPORTINCORPORATE COMMENTS
PREPRRE CONCEPTUftL DESIGN WORK PLftNPREPRRE ENGINEERING DESIGNREVIEW BY EPfl/CH2M
PREPfiRE FINflL REPORT
MftNflGEMENT flCTIVITIES
t
OCT 84
VKONTHLy
1PROJ
NOV 84
r LIST ALT
WORK PLAf
^REPORTSr
MT©
DEC 84
:RNRT[VE'S
^
0 1 8 S
JftN 85
"~V LET
" ^> 4 vPROJ. MTG
FEB 85
rER REPOR1
——V DRrtP
V t
REVIEW
^1
MAR 85
REPORT
ORK PLflN———w CON
OES
„ ,y „.--,„„ ,MTC FE^
'»
flPR 85
:EPnWL[GN
v•^L REPORT
v
FIGURE 3
000934
APPENDIX A
DETAILED COL/T SUMMARY
000935
APPENDIX ATABLE OF CONTENTS
o0000000000
Table I, RI/FS Project Cost SummaryOptional Fonn 60—CH2M KILLRI Cost Summary—CH2M HXLLFS Cost Summary--CH2M HILLOptional Form 60--Black & VeatchDirect Expenses (Schedule 2)--Black & VeatchRI Cost Summary—Black & VeatchFS Cost Summary—Black & VeatchOptional Form 60—Ecology and Environment, XncTable 2, Rl/FS Cost Display—Region VI FITTable 3, RI/FS Cost Summary by Firm
DEIWC/024
000936
Table 1
INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL SITEFORT SMITH, ARKANSAS
RI/FS PROJECT COST SUMMARYWA 69-6L37
January 24, 1984Company
CH2M HILL (see Optional Form 6 0 ;less Cost Element No. 8)
Slack and Veatch (see OptionalForm 60)
Ecology & Environment--Corp.(see Optional Form 60)
Region VI FIT (see Table Mo. 2)Fee ( 3 1 ) on Region VI FIT
TOTAL Ri/FS PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Cost Estimate
$134,229
» 164,227
1 , 9 6 6290,3608^711
$ 5 9 9 , 4 9 3
f -OJCOV-0/
RI FS Total
REM chargeable costsFIT chargeable costsTOTAL COSTS
DEIWC/022
$184,903288,760
$473,663
$124,2301^600
$125,830
$309,133290,360
$ 5 9 9 , 4 9 3
000937
^W»«»»*-*^» • r»«0»'*^<» 1 »l^»
'<'<£J£.-tACJ®ND D£l'ELOPy£V7
TiMi Jomi 11 faf •*c •hen /»/ lubmrtiion of rod or pficm| diu (f PTH 1-t.KP-H n required uu/M; tub«i)iu(nn fof the Opoonil Fofni 19 n wi^orutd by ihr cofttnmne o&cet-
HJLW4 O* WlltQt
CH2M HILL SOUTHEAST, INC.HOM< CtfACI ACOtf&S
1941 Roland Clarke PlaceRest-on, Virginia 22091OlvtUONtki »« LOCATlONdl WHCK wQU tS 10 U KVOCMCD
Denver, Dallas, Kansas Citv» fi Ft. SmithDETAll DESCRIPTION OF COST ELEMENTS
1 DIKCI mwmltfmiH — £«4J*tf if
«. ^voutiD »*ns» tuKOnriACTIO'TiMir. 0"<«-./1; Uw *»A»(tlAl
/;/ »ou« (fJWOAiocOMfttfKui rrcMl/J; WTIIOtVI&IOHJU fUMlfllS 1 If fifr fJwir fMfJ
ror.u D/wcr n^rt<MLI UtIIW OnlHlAO' tl^lf X.VI i«M»J
1 WIOlA*Ot IS^MI/H
P4P30
TOl-U 0/K<CT UfiOt
*. LAW OvtMAO '^ftf/J D^wnrcf •r ^N< CtfMff'
TOT^L LABOH 01'tltllt.iDi inCut nilM6 rfn/«^if| /<1 •w4 tff G^wMsl nmlt^iMtl
Not applicable—using EPA Contract Lah Program
«
roriL smut. ruT/vc« tHOJUlOWKNl SSf ^wl f^iitl tluvn, M IA^I At (866 Exhibit A)7 IHAVIt rf/^mJfki<ir; fGny^fbi/> — ^WfA^&i4^r/f/ (866 Exhibit A)
«. fUNifOitAnoNi HI OHM 0« flAUltlMCI
iora TK<I «.1 CO**$Ul»w*t» ft^vhff-.fM'yM-Wfl
a^ ^eolocw and EnvironK^nt! Corporate.- Buffalob. Black f Veatch - Kansas City
Tor.u co\s<L7 <\n• on«c Ctucfeoin rfftuc Mr ftirtif .u (see Exhibit A)10 ro/.U OfM&f COi/- ,4\0 Ul£Kt/t </)1 1 OCMtUt WOAOMMtitlArM IU(N3| fXtfft 12^ X tf tM ttlMftH \M. 3 ;•
1 2 •OVMIU •
13 TO/<1. U*;M<n.» <,UM
1 4 ni 01 Honris iOT4L esri AArw con A\O FEE on muni
wr-tV
^ ^
t *lHS WO/0
WA Ho. 6Remedial
.StudyIndustri101*1 AMOUNt Of MOWA
l300,422
(ITIMAHOHOU1S
1 ,41096
268
OH »All
0.41
'/ ."-"" ..
n yivas 10 u «niiMtD9-6U7Investigation and Feasibility
al Haste Control, Arkansas
IAH/HOU«
24.6517.708.37
•XUUR
38.734
• •
ES1
tStCOS? /!/
34,756.1.7352,243
111 COH Hi
15,881
ItKO
1ST COS*/*/
7.7flQ2.1.QO
nice1.966
164,227
v/'m».i 01 muna^rmeni •na DwageiApprov»l No. 29-ROlt<
tkCl HO
N/A
COi* Cl/
<*0v-t toucn»nc>M MO68-01-6692
——w
D ru
»t 'JJ
TOlAt(s» cosr
38,734
15,881
425
9,880
166^1932.72Q,
46,868
280,70-119.J21
300,422
HO O* flOlt
H/A '
(tfti-EKE
•—^ao"-c^
"""•"""flO'<r-
0/—*
OPTlOSAfc roillH MOootx* WlOnrfJl Swr* AJnuwmJduKPM 1-16 »«U6C-ISI
000938
JnJ rrJxil «afrimO NMX *M6 tmi IK IAIUN
N. fc'ayne SelltnanCor.tract Administrator
HAJ4 0» »B>* 0*tl O* tUK-uSUO^
CH2M HXLL SOUTHEAST, INC.EXHIBIT A-SUPWRT1NG SCHEDULE (Specify. I/man spaft h »«</«/. mi nunO
COST (t MO
6.7a.
7b. ..., ,a.,n, „ . . .,,,u.-„„„,,
T": '
1. K*4 *MI (IICUDVI *6t»<« Of '*•* VMttb 11*1(1 OOvdKMtMl n«0««^0 AMT HvKW Of 'GUI ACCOVNT1 01 UCOIOi IN CONMCTIOM W>(H u** 01*4 >OOv|h««l»I »4i«i iOMTKACt ©• WCONlUCT wlw mi rUt 1WUVI rONTHi*
E) <t1 D"0 firfn.^trff^r.tHAMi w« •acwu Of MVXWTNO o/na AMO u«mouM nufwox Miwn»/iniMitO*<
DCAA Seattle, Washington Dennis Petergon. 206/442-47'?0«. WU TOV ttOviU M UU Of AMT GOvifteMlNl MOHTr IN IM( HUOlMAMCl O* TK( KC^OUD COMTtAfn
E w 0 N0 /V^1- •*•"/» - '»'»»«» w»"*' m*t (Schedule. AlBL oo vou Kout oovUMMiNi cowm? tiHAJOHG 10 H«K>LM fHa noorto cfiMftAcn
O m D no ft/yti. ^wn/f.t Q *a»*MCi w<Nn Q WXMIM fxvwMri o< [ ] <UMIAMTUO LOAMSIV. 60 «0u HOW HOU) AHT COMttACI l0r. A fw i«r« ««J is^i^^mif JlwfW {IH&Of ^/ttlH KM fHt &AJMJ CM IUUIAI wou CAuiB *0< k« tfi
MOfOUD COmiACn
D "» D "o w^1' **•/•/»-;V b0«i A<& C011 lUMMftiT COftfOCJft WIIN tMl COil HMClPUt U1 KUIIH •« *GtNCT BGAAlKXi?
^3 1fft 0 N0 ^V**' e«yi*<• — WKM* •» UlMWf f^ttf
tfil A.W ®
ml fttiRKr* i* O/ ihi* dJtc. <A KTuriJtfHt •ith ihr InKruinni in Oflrnm. Jnd <kr ?w«Bo»rt »hi^h I'ullir
(TIM DtSC«l"K>l {Sft f—tftf 1^
Disoosable Safety Eauioment and ClothingTi'ansportation—14 round trip air fares @ $450, plus 1
round trip @ $200, plus 32 days car rental @ $40Per Diem-15 days @ $60TeleDhone. twstaqe reoroductions, word processing, and others
FP.P-: 10% of Cost Eloment No. 13 minus line 8 (280,701*-166,193)5^ of Cost E-lement No. 8b. (1^4,227)31 of Cost Element No. 8a. (1,966)
TOTAL FEE FOR COST ELEMENT NO. 14
Reaion VI F3,T Office and ^ouioment used durJ-n^RI Activities ie qoverment piroperty.
-
•
»
Sit C O S T I t l
425
7,7802,1002,720
., - .^-451 •• " ' • "B'.m""1
„„ ., „„„ gg,,,,,,,,
19,721Oi-
CM„„,.„„„„.„.„, ,00 , , ,
————©—
OPTIONAL roKM 60 l lf l^lt
000939
INDUSTSlflL UftSTE COHTRO.FOBT SMTti, fiRKfihSftS
K66237.MUft69-6U7
WHE .
" SENIOR ENGfi
L DCirCER
[] ENGIfflCT
| STflFFOC
r 8RTED1
| JRTECH
p OFFICE
k*
L TOTfiLHRS
p TOTftL <
tflTMULT
R T1W5.
aJBSIfTftCE
?L 010*5
f" asctKni
TOTBL
ff» BsyPCSBl
fiEKDIflL INVESTISflTlOM TfiSK
L£VB. RflTE TflSLI
M 84.65 SS7197.S(
P3 17.7» 1177.«
P2 14.64.«
PI u.6a «.M
TB 11,69 i.tt
Tl a. 75.ft
0 fl.37 42351.54
344
77S6.34 3304.94 5&36,
2.65»243.1t 865694 15291.42
ai. M4 .1
569.)
1966.8
£55fl9.fll
3
a»ai6
4
rnM
TASK.2 TfiSK.3
139 1943^4.50 47S2.I0
e sa.W 9^49
a a•W «w
e fliE0 tW
e «.M .«
.» .N
12 16169.44 133.92
142 &2
579.M me.NIU.M T^M
285.99 4S5.M
.69 .»
%93.94 1B176.42
Tfta<.4 TfiSK 5 TfiSK,
68 94 211676.23 2317.10 6696.
32 4 •566*44 79.88
1 9.U .M
« 1.63 .«
9 «.« .M
Q 9.% .W
\Z 12 I1W.44 IW.44 1&37,
112 111 392 1362
2343.64 246&34 7644.08 29343.16
6138.76 6519.452W27.49 76879. t8
579.M S39.M 539.
189. M la.tt 12«.
315.N 219.10 5 .
.« .«
72U.76 /379.452If77.49 .M fi9^«.9a
wBWvnM^u^aaisssMsti
6 TQTtiL
£8 16428 2578^
e 9W 1734,6
03 .i!
N .«
N ,t
66 .(
24 216SB 1624.66
M 6230.!
M laiN.M
ee 234&e«
1966.
i^^T»M,ri(>air)ii^
'6
»
ifl)8
e»
0»
9»
e»
M
M
«
,—
0^00^B-
0/—»
...d-M bBlUA
000940
flffl HB JflUIQBV ?t I AiW r W^9 ilrvlUFim c i JinINDUSTRIRL WSTE COMTROL
! FCST S.1ITM, RIKflKSflSi
1
•
C- NftiC ."IT- 1 ^ 1 1 1L
SENIOR EN55
LEN61F£2
EEXSItCEX
Ew S7ffT£N6
^ SR TU.-
?" JB TECh
[ OFFICEL—«
r———h
TOTfilHfiSi/^ TDTfiL 1
p » ftT HJLT
p1 TRfi L
P. SUBSISTfiNCE
(ice's1. §UBCflKTR
IS' TOTflL
£?; B;UFCS32
- - - --^aaei - -- — - - - - ^a,N U K A P L R H C O S T- - Ja& -
Cti2N HILL 1.66237. Myfl6?-&-37
FKS:B1L1TY
LEVEL fMTt TftSK. 1 TftS<. 3 TftSK. 3 TftSK. *
^ 24.65 2 f l 3 2 l 6 3 a 5 2 4 8 6 8 9 6493.00 758.68 394.4« 788.B8 1381.63 1163.Zfl 1676.23 2366.4«
P3 17*70 0 8 6(CO •W iW iW
P2 14.64 a 6 9 9•00 •w «W •W
PI 13.02 a fl e e*TO iQo iVS i8Q
T2 11 .69 0 6 0 8M M AX jto• •ITO <W a9D
Tl 8.75 9•W (89 «w |VQ
0 8.37 9 4 2.66 33.48 .« 16.74
26 36 15 34
493.M 52.23 394.49 305,54 1298.54 1216.68 1743.16 2fil7.M
2.62 1291.66 2154.37 1633.33 2119.51 3462.17 3187.76 4567.66 685785
,efl 499.08 .W 530.U
.N 69.U .» 188.09
iM.69- IW.M iw.w iw.% IW.OT ice.M i%.w IM.M see.ft)•ea .88 .» .oi
1391.66 2^4.37 1133.33 2863.51 3502.17 3287.78 S317.W 6957.83
S U M K ^ R ^ —-.-^
STUDY TRSK
TftSK 5 TflSK.6 TftSK.7 TfiSK,8
.tt .63 .1 .N
9.% .N .« .ee
• «-83 .M .68 .60
efid aa <id &iiw tW tW iW
a.M .00 .M ,%
2 4 8 3816.74 33.48 66*96 251.16
54 52 76 126
.63 530.»3
.96 129.M
.ea
- ^- - - - -
•
TffTff.
3648972.69
9.68
dB.09
fl '89 ^tOlp
CO< <—•
.S9 0<-*
.09
416.59
414
9391.19
24684.66
1559.66
390.09
.01)
27254.68
:
000941
CONTRAC^RICING PROPOS(RESEARCH AND Df^fcZOP.MfNY
Th» fmm H for UK »»KB /*; lubmimoB of fo»< of pricing <Jiu (KC FPR l-).80l-i| n required andfill lubiiituKon for the Op(ron*l Fofot 19 if luihorucd br (he Concriciuig officcf.
MA.M{ o o"uoa
Black & Veatch Engineers-ArchitectsHO-i <ynCl AOOXSS , , ~'"~
1500 Meadow Lake ParkwayP.O. Box 8405^n«;as fit-v. HO 64114 . . . . . .
oivistOxt&i ANO IOC*TICM(S| wKEif WQIK ts TO u nyo«woIndustrial Waste Control Site; Fort Smith,A
DETAIL DESCRIPTION
i. DKECT MAtiBAl fiiwii M e^u AI })ot Applicable«. »mcHASiO rxirst. su»cOHriACT(0 ITIHS/. OfM(K—/IJ tAW K*f(«*Jl
( 1 ) VOU1 StANOAtOCOMAUItOAl (T(Mi
/.I/ iNTllOtvlSlONM llAMlfOS /^» Mifr rAw Wt;
ror/<i. RiKur M.^reitHLa. iitiAi ovitMiAo- /^ft \.\-i fc/»»; Not Applicable
) (Ht(0 lAlOt IS^flfyi
P4P^. - -.P2 .PIT2 - „ . . .
.0 .TOIAI. niRit.r t^Bon
4. IA»O« Ov(ln(*0 fSpfiify Oip^nimiii ^ Cfii tivuf)'
General 0£ficeQyerhead
TOr.li L^OOR lH'ERtlE..10
1 SMCUl KITING iln,li^i»t /'// "*''* r' GfufiMtui imi^llulmii
Not Applicable CUsin&CLP for analytical services)
ftlTAL tPHUAt. ThAH^t,
«. stciAi iflwM^ti iif wi i^irf finouii in E\^ii .if Re^er to Schedule ^? fRAVtl fif^n-hl riu f; /Clt» i/fJtfi/i «N mt/tAftf YfAr^ir/fJ Refer
M IlAMlrORlAllON
t. »(1 Ol(« 0« SUtStittMCff
lo/ </. /»<r»-/
11 COMlUltAMIS ll^t»llff-.fsrp4H-Wtl
^of^r frtfifh(*t1ll1p...2 - - . -
ffirn. {n\sri.i IM\» GIM(» i>iur* COSH tiHiitt •» £«Ai6» .<; Refer to Schedu]to roru. fiisf.t.i owl *\n mninmi» otwtuiANo»OM>Nn»*tivi(iif(Ni(/Jt^M ^ ,/.«„ f/t^w \,4i. ^ ^Q(; Applicable1 3 •o»*itKs' Not Applicable
11
•< '"^ROEitx Refer Co Exhibit A•* ror«- EJnti iru* <.mT <\,n ^^ «|K
1
-——""———•—SK""*SAL wa\ ^"} 1
Humus *NO/O< scv'as •0 w W^ISHEOSubcontract Services to Zone IREM/FIT ContractRemedial Investigation/Feasibi
tQtJU AMOUNT Of PtO^OSAl
* 164.227OF COST ELEMENTS
ESttMATEOHOUKS
6551001269292497296
OH tAt(
.08381
to Schedule 2
& 2
rain i:Mimtin <IIM
ltAIE/HOU».
25.5020. ?!16.9414.8511.32
7.61•
X **« if
54^206
CST
ESTCOST /t;
16,20.
HI CO
58.749
tS*C03
(St COST fff
IVWHIl
pir
Office of Minieinent Jnd BiKicrtApprovl No. 29-ROIHI
f*.Gl NONA
COST <1J
^4,5,2,
(?,2,
f»~77
GOV-I sonciuno68-01-fi
70373155733b626253
ii iti
•t fH
.^0-400
i; 152.
4 -——i
lOTAt(SI COST'
^4.206
58.
8.920;
25.000»'•"•5; 14515S.
U.164,
NO 01 '*GI1NA
I
lit5
HHQ~
)692
7^9
740
7^
760l
46712271
/ Study
ttfEa.ENCE-'
CM•-'" •rn
00T~
..„ ^ 0|
-
000942
Thii p-opoiil •* *ubm>«ed tor ux in cunA«.-lion with ind in mpuni« 10 {Otieri*« KI-P. tU f
Subcontract Services Co Zone II REM/l-'IT ContractIndustrial Waste Control Site; Fort Smith, AR
,' txil rliiftiili* 11 6{ th<« dl((. in tccurdince ruh ih<- (Aiiruniunt to Oflrrofi ind <hi fctunotn xhich follow.
:mo -uurf AND Tltl(
L. T. Schaper, Project Manager
Black & Veatch Engineers-ArchitectsEXHIBIT A-SUPPORTING SCHEDULE (Specify, if man ifiace i. neeJ<t/.
COST £1 NO.
1 t.
r——i
^
.
•
-
*
f. HAS AMT IXtCUTtVt AOtKY Of Ihl UNttiO ItAttS COVt»N**(Nr H»OlM{0 ANY 1(VI(W 0' TOUI *<:COUM*S 0» ItCOICi IN CONN((;HON WITH ANV 0*><1GOVffNMiNi fllMf CONtRACi 01 SUaCt>^"*Ct WirmN tM( »AST tWUVl MOMIMl?
(3 ns DM0 ^v'"- •/""A t '"- /NAM( AM* AOOKil Of 1(VIEW)N<; 0"<t AM6 IMCHVIOUAt
DCAA, 302 E* Lexington, Independence. MOu. wni »ou 'iouat tM( ust o» AMI covemf«Nf MOPM" ini »CB*O'IMAMCI o/ rw$ r«»ouo eoNT«Acn
U Tl!^ 03 N0 ////"• i^wf'i V* wi^ w nf^wn f^ti*t
HI. 00 tOU itOUItf 60Vl*MM<M CONtfAff HHAt^tHG 10 rUf<HM fWS MO^OitP COWHACn
O VU [3 M0 ///^"••/W/r-f D A8VANCI >»ytt't»<ll Q MOGIEM fATl-<Ntl 0» 0 CUA<ANl((0 lOANi
IV- 00 »OU NOW KOlC AH» CONtlACT /O.- V* 7»« i«r^ an) m^^^»t/yMO»O»IO eow-»Acn
D w Q M0 <if t». ^^fy.f-v eofs »xs con SUMMAfty c04fO«M wiin tt« COST fKu ind SIT foaw (M AOENCV tt&AAii NS?
1'H ^ti ( J KO Hf M9. nf/i/w M w»i» »>' ifp^fnu fuX'J
fTEM OESCIIMION
8Z x Cost Elements Nos. 3 & 4 (54.204 + 58.747)8S x Cost Elements Nos. S+6+7+95X x Cost Elements No. 8 (25,000)
Total Cost Element 14
1
StGM*ru*t
^7. y^
/'JM ffosnon 5)
(0 + 740 + 8.920 +
fnwMti^ ftR6t>t pn/ttitf t0l V
5,145)
tEiey*«>
816
Mt SAM{ OB HWlAt W0*< £M.l(& «( |Y IMS
. -
OAt{ Of lUlMilllON
January 3 3 ^ 1 9 8 4art ret'erse)
• —TT"TT"•— —©-—
^l MUMl(B/EtT(NitON
-374-6213
(STCOSI /X/
""^•036^ "-1.184 "" -1.250
11 .467 . . , m ,
OPT10NA1. FORM &0 (lO-'ll
000943
Industrial Waste Control SiteFt. Smith, Arkansas
SCHEDULE 2
BLACK & VEATCH
DIRECT EXPENSESJanuary 23, 1984
Special EquipmentDisposal Safety EquipmentSafety Equipment Rental
TotalTravel10 Mantrips to Dallas @ $375 »7 Mancrips to Ft. Smith @ $25022 Days Car Rental @ $45 sMiscellaneous
Total
$ 460 ^-280 ^
$ n0 00
1.750990
30$ 6,520
$ 3.750 0
Per Diem or.JSubsisCgQcg,40 Mandays @ $60 $ 2,400
Consultancs• Franklin & Associates• FS Laboratory Studies
Total
Other Direct CostsTelephoneReproductionPostageOther
Total
$15.00010,000
$25.000
$ 5102.735600
1,300$ 5.145
000944
B L A C K & V E A T C H
U O R K P L f l K C O S T S U K H f t R Y
ItffiUSTRlH. WS^ C3KTROLFORT SKHti, flflKASSPS
y&6e37.fle?69-^37
CATE V16/84
RefflMJai Investigation Task
crr^ 5322 2154 1243 1491 663 497 1137^- ^
eF1
^
^ ———-
04«
L|P
„. Total Expense, » 2695 1685 2505 1720 1100 100 9805
*H
f"
2218 1530 2550 1224 1020 1224 W
'\
1984Caiesory twel Rate 1
Senior Engineer M 25,50 87
Engineer P3 20.71 257
engineer P2 16.34 731237
Staff Engineer PI 14.85 44S53
$r. Technician T2 11.32 57645
Of/iK 0 7.61 68517
Total Hours 586Raw Labor,* 10594 3835 4321 3047 1744 4803 2S403
Special Equipment, » 0Transportation, 5 1305Subsisted, % 360Other Direct Costs, t. 1030
Total Subcontract, ( 6
Total Price, S 26?52 1
2
50
104
8136
00
445
430
180
140885 1425 760. 840540120
0
0586 12430 8715 5112 10917 74511
3 4
100 48
60 72
24 16407 271
00
00
16122 61
200 144
300 300
480 360 120300 300 140 100 1990
0
5
00
00
8
0
40
32
00
00
00
861
80
0
0
HI
6
48 383
24 549
240 3012717 3407
48 152365 1157
360 1550 -
Total
00
09
000
0
SB&
i2to2050^
c^653
7435215I860
SUSS
f^,
0
)
.1
-T
•s^^^
000945
tKOUSTREft. yflSTE CONTRG.FOftT StiTH. fiiKfttiSflS
yfiK37.eflW69-&37
Feasibility Study T&sA
Category level
Senior Engineer P4
6191'neer P3
Engineer P2
Staff Engineer Pi
^r. Technician T2
Office 0
Total HoursRsu Later, 1
Special Equipment, t 0Transportation, tSubsistCTC^, aOther OuBCt Costs, <
Total Expenss, »
1984Rate
25.50
20.71
S6.94
14.85
U,%
7.61
i
4Q1020
48994
00
00
00
430
922045
00
100
100
2
16408
24497
00
24356
891
430
761382
000
240
24fl
3
8204
28580
16271
• 16238
445
26122
ee1460
006
m200
4
28714
561160
00
24356
24272
24183
1562684
000
400
400
5
24612
56U60
00
48713
16181
4P304
16429?C
000
350
350
6
32816
801657
13?2236
801188
40453
16122
3806471
000
300
300
7
441122
40828
00
32475
24272
16122
1562819
01305
5401015
2860
8
802040
1202485
00
24356
80906
24183
3285970
000
550
550
Total
2726936
452936JL
1433250^
24§°368T
01^0
2219
1441036
146025801
01305
5403155
5000
Total Subcontract, i 2500 2500 10000 5000 2500 O 2500 0 25000
Total Price, t 7334 5335 14901 11723 9687 12058 14029 89716
000946
—,————————————^B» "' ' "——"""——————————ySK "•CQNTrW-- PRICING PROPOSAL W
C RESEARCH -<VO 0£r£LOP.UE\T>
TI)!* fwrti 11 fot uie when ft/ lubmititon of coll or pricing <jiu (Me FVR 1-i.aOT-Jt D tcquirrd *fldHtJ itibitKuwi for the Opnonil Form W fi tuihomed by tht ContTtCUnK officer.
n*Mt Of OFFEIOR
Ecotoov and Environment. .Inc. . . .. .KOMI Of"C£ ADOiESS
195 Sugg Road, P.O. Box DBuffalo. New York 14225
DIVISIONS! V*0 lOCAfONlSl WHEII WO«X IS t0 U HUOItMfO
BuffaloDETAIL DESCRIPTION
1 6fCT MAnHAl (lliwm SM £iAAi( <J
<- PUICHASIO ?AIIS
t. SlJKONtftACTfO itfMS
(- OTKiC—/l/»AW*WWU*l
/^/ VOUIt SliWOAlO COMMtfCUl ntMI/j; INTCtHVISlOWAl TlAN&ftU /^» */*«'• /&<« full
TOlAl, DIRECT VtrESI a
3 MAT{II*L OVfHfAO' /ftrift %.\i *Li»a/
3 OKECT i*to>/^/,; (including fringe)P-4P-3Ser.retary .„ . - - ... -- -- ,
;
TO»AL niltECT L.<fl0tf
< lAW OV(IK(*O fSfifiify O^niumi <r CA/ Cuitf)'
i
ror-ii. t^/ioff 01 Emis.ioS SnClAL ttSWIti //J»i/«A»( /*»// wrt df CfrvmnnJil lum/l^lumf i tV COlt f t , ~-
1'
I
rflTii ^EC/U t-isn^G* 1HO«1 (OutfuENf ///Afrt/<*<*i*/ Ihmnt *n S.\kikn •IJ f .
? ItAVEL /// /»w/ iA*»»</ /<S<r» </«b«/i •« ^ihnhid ^<hiJuh) ty cost /£;
d. rU.NSh3*t*tK3N
A H« 010. 01 iUISIirENCE 1
/OTIJL rtttr£L1 CONiuirANtS {lifiitiifJi-fMi^u-fani
f
i
roru<o\?ii,r*sn ! . ;9 OfH(F i>i>EO COS>1 ilifwiu m £.^&n * } IflO
*o r<»u OMecrtOfT t\ooic»Hf)/s ' 1.603 •I* GENHAfc tMO *0»lNlSt«A"Vl tM?6N5E/«."» 10 1 ^ </ 'Sil ifwm \M. Irt ;' ^rti-
i, lOYAints •
11 font. esrmnkn ui\r ' *SC9
•* »(i0»»»0n» 3% 57
IA »oru yr/n irtr* rtir <\D Fti us vsitFir } ,966
SUMUES AND/OI iEBVlCES TO U FUlNliM
Reniedial Work at IWaste Control» ForW 66237.00 (C
(OUl AMOtflrfl Of MOPOSJU.
* 1 .966OF COST ELEMENTS
ESIlMATEOHOUHS
.4.. „-..38. ,-„..^ ,8
OH »Ali
,38 .6
l(AfE/. HOUll
•r ?6;34'"2?:56'
7 . 9 8 ^ fi4
> UUB 1 IStCOit ^IJ 1
1027
EST
£STCOST f5)
ti COST/t;
Office of iMina^eApprovaf \(:
»AGE NO NO y »A£,£S
COST / S )
n850. „
CO
ndustrialth Smith,H 979-2)CiOv T SOitOTAnON NO
3
TOTAl «EfE».EST COST- ENCE-
o
•TW' ' • •
396
t
ment Jnd Budge!3- ,:9-ROl84
ii
Ark.
r-— — h - »
COV—
r-
OPT10VU. FORM w.0«ob«r if'tC<flt-;-ii St'n.<rt UinifnRr i,mCPR --Ibmn-<06>'"10t
000947
Thu propoui 11 lubniiiltd tor UM in i ^gi.iiufl «nb iniJ in fttpunw to fOiHi-ibe ItF". »/../ ^S&W Q|1
rfod ririccii out b«*f eitxmtci is of" rfiii dice. in Jicurdirtcc •mh ch< Initrucouni it Olfrfoft Jnd the Footnote! «li(ch foH'i»•tw ^AMi wo nm I stOhAfun
N . '"? 'James B. Coll ins, Controller y^^/•a^^ '
««**« Of »<t» /
Ecology and Environment, Inc. 'EXHIBIT A-SUPPORTING SCHEDUIE (Specify. I/wore space if needed, use rtienef
COST EL NO
9 lt
;. . . . .„„ „.,„..„„,-. ^,
'
. „ ^ . . nverhp^^i
. - fi-A A
i
'i
tt HAA Am (llCunvt AGI*<V e' 'hi UWKO *U(tS GOv((N-dNt K*KiU»iO .u" llvi(w Of *OUt ACCOUNTS 0« IIC0101 ^ COi CCnOM witx ANT s*^<*
00«EUcM(Nf riiMi cONlucr 0« lr»c&Nr»A6T WITHIN fni fxil twnvt fc6*<*Hsr
0 m QN0 ///'J"- •*''""/' w••r /NW< ANO AOOXIIS Cf uvitww; Ofrici u« MMVIOUAI
• '•m rov itOuui tK UM Of AN* 6o»(if«M(Hi »»oHir» in fhi HWO&MAMCI cur tm now*a coNriAcr
- £ ) ^U a <'//'»"- ^H'i/f *» /•'»»n» *y af^fitii f^<HBL GO r0u UOUiXE; 60v(tHMENI CONrUCt fiNtfONO 10 fflfOBM THIS »t<WS(0 CCMKAC^
Q tU D NO f//^*. nAn/fA-; 0 AOVxrtCl »A»MINIS 0 F10611U »»t»^WF3 0« Q QuAlANrHD iO*M
IV- 60 TOU NOW H0t& AMT CONflACt /Of. A J«B i«rf rf«J l^ffH^mtifMtOKMW COnrtACO
D til Q MO ///^*. ^iify.t
v odi* i*c» £O<T SUMMAIV CCWOIM wim f**i coir niHCinu irt »O»T» IN A<n«y uswAttOw?
L ' '(*il Q "0 Iff M*- af'-uw *» WMW* <f u^i'nir nyl
RtM OESCRIfTtON
• OtherDirect Costs
Coimmi cations .CopvPostagp A Pnrwat-riing
NOTE: Overhead rat.p< qnnfpd,arp-thp nrnu.-fcinnal . . . ^rates per t-heMrf a^
——————rnntrflctor. ^However, .... .,..,. ,,„. . ocKmatflf4 l-rt h& ac ^rtn^.c •
-^ (-/ '\
^»t foetus^ t;
',
-Kfinuasted, by- .tha--f-ho -a^t-nal t-a+oe
C;f^
, 2.1^- ,.. -
ftusft^ {lltfiOf f»fHlli KH fht IA*(( 01 il*BL»» w0»t t»U(0 10» IT fMi
! 0*tt 0' SufcwSStOt*
E 1 1 / 1 5 / 8 3
1 EST COS* •S;
„ . , 80, r 30
- , „ ,-. -. 70
•prune——————————f<v~arQ • 03
s—., .-.. ,.,, , , , „ ,0.—————————r\
FdiPMONi MUMUVWWWn
SM HiHru fv humtfu»i fmsMt
1
orriOi-A*. »oftH w . io--11
wotiilt) (HHJ.Wtin/lunriil . . . — . . , - ,
000948
Table 2REGION VI FIT - RI/FS COST DISPLAY
INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL SITE, i'ORT SMITH, ARKANSASWA HO. 69-6L37JANUARY 24, 1984
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT (REGION VI FIT)
DIRECT LABOR
P3P2PIT2
12560
2,0081/504
TOTALFIT Labor Costs;SUBCONSULTANTS
4/084
4,084 x $40/hour " $163,360
Subcontractor No. 1Subcontractor No. 2Subcontractor No. 3Subcontractor No. 4Subcontractor No. 5Total Subconsultants:TOTAL FIT COST
GeophysicsFencingSurveyingReport GraphicsDrilling
S 14,0003,0001,0001,000
.AOS.OOO
$127 ,000
$290,360
000949
Rer
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
RI
Feasibility Study
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
6.
PS
PKOJECT TOTAL (RI/PSt
71 r : E
I
Tasks
nedial Investigation
Project Startup
Site Definition
Phase 1 SiteInvestigations
Phase II SiteInvestigations
Remedial InvestigationReport
RI Management
Subtotal
Develop RemedialAlternatives
Screen Alternatives
Conduct EngineeringStudies
Evaluate Alternative
Prepare PreliminaryReport
Prepare Conceptual resign
Prepare Pinal Report.
PS Management
Subtotal
re r"
KDUSTR:(
CH2&'Hours
344
142
262
112
110
392
1,362
20
36
16
34
S4
S2
76
126
414
1.776
" :rsRI/PS
EAL WAST:tfA NO- 6
( HIU.Dollars0
7,726
3,305
5,836
2.343
2,488
7^644
29,343
493
822
394
806
1,299
1,217
1,743
2,617
9-391
38,734
FT
T<COST 1
E COMTI9-6L37.
RegiorHours
220
242
2,142
1,024
120
296
4,044
16
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
4.084
•——— T
sble 3iREAKOUTWIL, FOR. JAKUAR
l VI PITDollars
8,800
9,680
85,680
40,960
4.800
11,840
161.760
640
960
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,600
163.360
n r-^BY FIR
T SMITHY 24, 1
Blade &Hours
586
180
200
144
80
360
1.S50
92
76
88
1S6
184
380
156
328
1.460
3,010
m r:
M, ARKANSAS984
Veatch EDollars" He
10,594
3.895
4,321
3.047
1.744
4.803
28,404
2.045
1,382
1,460
2,684
2.970
6.471
2,8X9
5,970
25.801
54,205
3 r
i
: £ E I!UL-S E
SO
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
-^ r"
buffalo)oUars"
1,027
0
0
0
0
0
1,027
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,027
} " •
ToHours
1,200
564
2.604
1,260
310
1,048
7.006
128
136
104
190
238
432
232
454
1,914
8,920
•talDollars
28.147
16,880
95,837
46,350
9,032
24,287
220,533
3.178
3,164
1,654
3,490.
4,269
7,688
4,562
8,587
36,792
257,325
abRaw Labor.
)0 1 8 4 0Una form rate of $40 per hour established by iPMO.DRIWC/D20
000950
APPENDIX B
PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION
000951
IWC SITEKEY PROJECT STAFF
PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
CH2M HILL (SPM)
1. Submit project deliverables
2. Prepare monthly status reports
3. Center for all communications
4. Requests TDD's via RSPO
5. Approves all subcontracting
6. Prepares all Task Orders
Ecology & Environment PIT (RITM)
1. Onslte health and safety
2. OP
3. RI subcontracting
4. RI planning and status
5. Sampling chain-of"custody
6. RI document control
7. RX work plan input
8. Sampling plan for RI
9. RI Report
EPA-Region, VI_(RSPO)
1. Approves work plans and allchange orders
. 2. Interfaces with state agencies
3. Reports project plans andstatus to EPA Region and HDQS
C\J4. Requests TDD's via FIT-RPO <=f
CO5. Aerial photography & mapping ,-
0
Black & Veatch (PS-DO ^
1. Refinement of RI/PS activities
2. S/FS subcontracting
3. PS planning and status
4. FS document control
5. RI/FS work plan
6. PS Report and conceptual design
7< Work plan production
B-l
000952
Position; Regional Site Project OfficerDavid Price - RSPO
Responsibilities:1. Represent EPA in the management of all IWC Site activ-
ities.2. Represent EPA and the IWC Project in all liaison mat-
ters with state and federal agencies and private indus-tries (the principal communication link).
3. The principal communication link between the communityrelations group (EPA) and the project staff*
4. Approve work plans and all changes in work scope andbudget.
5. Define objectives and schedule deadlines for IWC Siteactivities with support from the SPM.
6 . Report technical and financial status of theIWC Project to EPA Region VI.
7. Approve all TDD's requested by the SPM and coordinateswith the FIT-RPO in issuing the TDD's to FIT.
8. Prepare work assignment for Regional and HDQS approval.9 . Approve RI/FS vouchers.
B-2
000953
Position: Field Investigation Team - Regional Project OfficerKeith Bradley - FIT-RPO
Responsibilities:1. Coordinate FIT-RI work on the IWC project with ERA re-
quested FIT activities on other projects.2. Coordinate with the RSPO in preparing TDD's for the FIT
to work on RI/FS activities.3. Issue TDD's to the FXT-RPM.4. Coordinate with the RSPO and RPM in establishing the
TDD budget.5. Support the RSPO on technical and administrative func-
tions at the discretion of the RSPO.
B-3
000954
Position: Site Project ManagerDick Moos - SPM
fie s ponsioxli t ies;1 . Management and primary responsibility for executing the
RI/FS Work Assignment at the IWC Site.2. Coordinate the RI/FS planning activities of CH2M HILL,
Black and Veatch, and the HI Team (FIT) .3 . Approve all project deliverables and submit these to
EPA.4. Provide the principal communication link between the
IWC Site project and EPA via the RSPO.5. Manage the staffing, planning, mobilization, and con-
duction of RI/FS activities at the IWC Site with ap-propriate support from the RI Team, the FS Team, andthe Technical Support st^ff.
6 . Define priorities, schedules, and work scope at theIWC Site.
7. Approve all subcontract procurement processes and par-ticipate with RI Team and FS Team in subcontractorreview and selection.
8. Resolve any potential conflicts between the HI Team andFS Team and coordinate with RPM and FIT-RPO concerningpotential conflicts between RI Team activities andFIT Region VI activities.
9 . Direct work of the CH2M HILL Technical Support Staff.10. Approve all invoices prior to submittal to ZPMO and
EPA.11. Request Health and Safety Plans from the Health and
Safety Manager (E&E, Corporate).12. Initiate all Task Orders ( T . O . ) and Technical Direction
Documents ( T D D ' s ) . Obtains approval of T . O . ' s fromRPTL and 2PMO and approval of TDD's from RSPO andFIT-RPO.
13« Maintain budget and schedule control.14. Maintain communication with external project partici-
pants such as state and federal agencies and industryat the discretion of and under guidance from the RSPO,
B-4
000955
15. Provide principal communication.link with EPA concern-ing community relations activities.
16* Maintain project quality.1 7 . Draft and submit monthly reports including technical
and financial status, sampling plans, REM performanceevent reports, etc.
18. Responsible for technical, management, and financialinformation transfer to the RPTL and 2PMO.
1 9 . Maintain project records.20* Manage document control provisions for documents in the
project team's possession.21. Comply with contract goals for small business, eco-
nomically disadvantaged business, and labor surplusarea subcontracting.
000956
Responsibilities:1. Direct and manage all FS activities assigned to Black
and Veatch; work with SPM in defining priorities andschedules.
2 . Direct preparation of RI/FS work plans utilizing FITinput for RI activities and CH2M HILL review of initialworking copy and draft work plan.
3. Develop preliminary list of remedial action alterna-tives prior to starting RI field work and refine thislist as the project continues.
4. Request required Task Orders and support the SPM inpreparing technical and cost portions of the T . O .
5. Report directly to the SPM concerning all IWC projectactivities.
6 . Work with the SPM and RSPO concerning all potentialchanges to the work plan. Change requests are initi-ated through the SPM.
? . Provide support to or observe RI activities to ensureefficient transfer of RI information and data to the FSactivities.
8. Take responsibility for all QA/QC requirements withinthe defined work scope performed by the FS Team.
9 . Submit all project deliverables to the SPM.10. Work with the SPM and RSPO to initiate and complete any
revisions requested en draft reports prepared by theFS Team.
11. Assist SPM during preparation of monthly reports (tech-nical and financial status, sampling plans,H&S reports, e t c . ) .
12. Submit all invoices and labor/expense reports to theSPM monthly.
13. Direct and be responsible for FS document control^written communication, and field logs for FS Team work.
14. Ensure fchat all equipment and personnel necessary toefficiently execute FS Team activities at the XW-J Siteare available.
B-6
000957
Take lead in procurement of Fo subcontractors.Monitor FS subcontractor rerformance; technical,schedule, and financial aspects.Responsible for Health and Safety training and medicalmonitoring of all FF Tea^n members.Direct production of the FS Report including conceptualdesign.
Support EPA Region VI community relations efforts asrequested througl* the RSPO via the SPM by supplyinginformation or personnel.
B-7
000958
Position: Remedial Investigation Project ManagerGordon Duncan " RIPM
Responsibilities:1. Direct and manage all RI activities assigned to FIT;
work with SPM in defining priorities and schedules.2. Direct RI Team efforts in preparing work plan, working
closely with CH2M HILL and Black and Veatch.3. Report directly to the SPM concerning all XWC project
activities.4. Work with the SPM, RSPO, RPM, and FIT-RPO concerning
all potential changes to the work plan. Requests ini^tiated thru SPM.
5. Coordinate project RI activities with the RPM (FIT) andFIT-RPO and keep them informed of project schedules andstatus.
6 . Coordinate with SPM, RSPO, and FIT-PRO to ensure thatRI Team has the required TDD's.
7. Take responsibility for all QA/QC requirements withinthe defined work scope performed by the RI Team.
8. Submit all project deliverables to the SPM.9 . Direct FIT'S participation in the early phases of the
FS to screen potential remedial action alternatives andassist continuity between the RI and FS activities.
10. Work with the SPM and RSPO to initiate an3 complete anyrevisions requested on draft reports prepared by theRI Team.
11. Assist SPM during preparation of monthly reports (tech-nical status, sampling plans, HAS reports, e t c . ) *
12. Maintain budget and schedule control of RI Teamactivities and report monthly financial status of RITeam to FIT HDQS management.
13. Direct and be responsible for RI document control, writ-ten communication, sampling plans, chain-of-custody,CLP requirements, site safety, and field logs forRI Team work.
14. Ensure that all equipment and personnel necessary toefficiently execute RI work plans at the IWC Site areavailable.
B-8
000959
15. Take lead in procurement of RI subcontractors.1 6 . Monitor RI subcontractor performance; technical,
schedule, and financial aspects.17. Take lead in defining CLP requirements and train RI andFS Teams in correct utilization of CLP.18. Responsible for Health and Safety training and medicalmonitoring of all RI Team members.19. Direct production of the RI Report.20. Support ERA Region VI community relations efforts, as
requested through the RSPO via the SPK by supplyinginformation or personnel.
DEIKC/011
B-9
000960
000961
APPENDIX CPRIORITY POLLUTANT - LABORATORY ANALYSIS
000962
mOSITY POLLUTANT - LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Due to the unknown character of the waste at the Industrial Waste Control^Ice and the limited testing program to date, a complete priority pollutant^^.on will be made for most samples collected in Phase 1. Following is alisting of the analytical protocol which is considered the prioritypollutant scan.
000963
UA EMVWCNMIL^TAL PXOTtCnOr^yi r Pi T - ^^y Sunpta M«n«««f^Box SIX.AJcMJXir-.i.Virum* 23J15 - W/357-2W- * • -
ORGAMCSAWALVr
.JAorABirY NbA«t „„„,„„.,,,., -LJ* SUTW(« LO. Not ,^,^, - „.....,-...... - -
Multiply Dwciitfi Umia by 1 0 or 10
AOO COMPOUNDSUK/t
flrt»/hifV f CM f (cfr«J« oo»)(3: A) U-dt.2 2.k.6-tricftlorocfWMiIfZiA) 55-50.? >i<?>(o*'0-M-cr»aBt ^ (2»A) M-57U ?. sftlofOBheftolOlAt 120-13-2 l.t-didtlorooheftol . . ^(5>Al 103-A7-1 2.t-1l^,tth»l(rfwy)l(57AI 11-73-1 2- nic-ocftcftol(JaAl 100^7.» k- iirooht-tot(ytAl 51.21*3 2.»-dinitrec<w»elWA) J3k*f2.1 k.(«diniiro-?wn«ihyl wnol(»--) 17J&4*9 owi»dit<ro&h?<wl ^t»3A» l<)t-»3-? -Shenol .... . .
BA»/N&unLU COUPOUNEU
(161 13-n-t u»nAehtrwrf ,«a; i3.<?.a bwnidiMUft* li0-4;-l I.?.t-nrt0lero<wniowi^6* ^ Ill-».) h«neniy^b r.i -» . . ^ , , „ , ,(ya) t».yi.i txmcfliywiwM - - , ,. 1 . 1 iii(116) ill.**-* bu« ly th?JhlhCL^l39ftl ll.U-7 l-<»i|»yort^t^thaf«^(2i6* 'H-M-I l .<^31?»'OB<*M'en*(S*»; . 3»1.?5.1 l.l-in tcr b^nnfn(P6I lOi-H.? l(twji^ilarobeAl«A«t21B> »l-H-t 3.1' n^lwatt<niidi.^»U56t :?l.l».? ?.» im»o»^trt«p(6) (.;O.I Z.t^Jintiratanww(•76) 132-M.? l.?^»fw»TP^4f*<ifty(3»»* »*-A*^ nutt-ift*htrt< .(MB) ^OS. l.? ><»i!(rephw»( ^«o»f *th*f(«l6> 101*1) . ) t-ftfcm^wt Sftwyl *tfW - -f»2Bl W31.S2.1 bil *;-cM<roMBMwl* *t»w - -t^W lll.ll-l bu fl. ftlgro<tfto»vJ t«iM^»in&) S?m.l Kc»x»lfiraouudi^(13&1 y7«*?*A »>«ia lera<p'<-loo«ni> ty ,(?tfl) ?S-»-1 •ie .er,i<^^tfll "*.»-J JWh'J^:afl* .
• ^6) U-ti.l nitfotxtzw .«2S» U-56-* N.A.iy<»» ieh*fl»iamift»(H6) t21«*<-7 •J^i^ofe^iB'SpyfJfniA^
',*7B* »-tl-)1 &«nxytbuivlehthJi4c . -fUft»,, l»-rt-( (ii-i.fcut^lcnwaurt . . . .UW il?^* l di-rt«?ccvt9naut.iriTae* ik-u-i di^thviori^n-.*(7161 1 ) 1 . I t - 1 ^m»*pv) &rtrtwlif .iy^s; <t-<i.) &tnio><)an-.n.-)<n« * .
recvcJ«d uocr
"*mi0illc» '!•»' 5w»9Mf*wtxw 1
- - 1
TB DATA SMUT
CAM N01,, QC Rfpofl NW
0 (Ct«ck 601 (of Apix^yruta Finnof)
BASE/NliUTHAL COMPOUN03Ul/1
»t^V<?y» CA5 < (cirei* art**
(71B1 iO-R-l bfiofifevrm*&iB», 205-M.2 bAiofblfluorififnetwffiB) ?07-0»-» bf^tefklfluorxAt^n*0(6) 311-31.1 c-rvi »C?»B) 10t-%^ tcwiB/.thvtt^C'161 120-12.7 tflthnce^et?36* Ill.i»~? b#nsa<i/-.i)ixfvltn<(IGfl) 16-71.7 (ltMcen«(1161 !3-flM y»tUAiAr«n« 'si
.. .•-..n,,..n . i .. ,•«.. ,„-. . T- i«. Bi». „„ . .„ »r»»w»» „»»»». • .n.-
(J2») M.70.; o-bcAio^ttuMhneen* -• '(061 l«).».l inQ«nofl.2.}*<t!)o«r«f COII»61 m^O^ B»Wt <-
oVOLATM3 »"*>
(;V1 107^1-4 lOTUinOV1 10?.|^.l Jhcrylo".Mf»&V1. l-} ^W(tVt )(<I}>) ev^oc (tTinchtyfi^t(?vi 101-W^ ffiyiteWM, . .<IOV» lOy.4*-^ U.4i lOfOa<M«(11VI ?l.)i-A I.I.I*tfi<yicro«tMn«(1;V» 7;.lfc.f l.(-HC-'l^&<lf^A^«(lii vi rt^a.5 l.l.l^tricnioroathiA*(OVI 7l.}t.» l.;,U.*«tf»c?f<ye«tM^*tttyi ?}^6.) cni6re«iMn«(HVl ||/»-:t-) i^^fe/tul^tvinrf (WwtW. P-O-l ff!wt»m(3iv> ?l.M-< (.}-dic?tsr<mht»ntpcvi IU-W-1 (ranf<U*dicnt«r««;h«ft«02VI n-a?. l.: ic-'!o*-oofco»n«Oiv* |00<t^H ff»A<-lt)-dicftte«-<wo&<n<
IOOAI.A1.4) cu-1.3.<t.^*tyw»w ... . .()|VI lflC-*l-A »tftv»b«fllp^(fc-V> ?3^1.2 -TKI.^K-« c-'lo<-d«(HVl r*^7.1 i»t(rom«iruA4(l*Vl •»-11.» ^bmiim«tnu««C?Vl »».;3.2 Bw»«(/»'n(Uvi ».;7-a bi i odiotoraHrpLVM^»v» ?^1-» puorarrxnfergiACt'uftf ,Wrt »?,/U tfKMar^Jifl'xiroi'lflha^M.irt ."t—l.t ilwirfi mMMmftlun*(aSV* i 2?. 11^ M t/^LW»«-;ft«e*»tittt lOl-W.) •Jk*cn«WVI ,»lJ:i-< y-<?tlo«-a«in«-i«itW »<-.^l-i •H'T! ;l4ridf
^*H
*-r<4mi« M * ^«t'nw*n»***-m. *»'••
000964
<»GAMC3AWAA,ySQDATASMW - r«««2iwnpte fkJmtar
L*6 f«m«d« LO. Nai
Multtpir 0€t«ciion Umia by I Q or 10
Ptsnaocs
ITtf<W^f50Pt
(MPl(»ip»(»*p)
'.'-:"(9*P)(WP)(MP»WP)(IMP)(|61f>)
tU"£!
CA5^305^0-?«s-?y-i.••.,*i-»W.?».5y2.55-»72-5*-!
.: *.;».?ll5.1>-?
1051^7-*71.W-1
?»3t.»»-A7C-k*-l
t02»-37-»5H-1*-*
arugAx(drcl«cn«
kidrinditldrindilofd*ff»,»'-06T•.>--ooet.v-OOQtf-<ndoiu)(»nf -«ndaiuJfan
tndoiulim luU«t«cndrinmdrm <I'l<Ay<rhcftacMarhtpacMa- «ooxid«Cf^MC
^y»aHc^j^^HC______.9<'aHC fUftd^wl
^^ CA3^C03P) 3H>n.y»0*^ 3H-1^Jagjpi 3i-itigtP) 33*0.31.*tigypi iiMy i.iaOJP) 1110fc.3A-7(LOJP) 111*1.it.]QlOP) 1^79.3^
UllPi ||Q»^7-<
illap) iU7fc.n.3
000965
• to ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYHVI Sample Management Office
'\ P.O. Boat 81& - Alexandria. Virginia 22313/ ^n-i/wc^ tfitwi e"s"- • »»°T "qftafi703W7-2W FT2 S-557.2,90
Sample No.
1NORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHE£T
LAfi SAMPLE tD. NO. ____________ QC RfiPORT NO. __
TA5K I (Elements to be tdenlified and Measured). ug/1 or mg/ks
(circle one)ug/1 of mg/hg
(circle one)
c0F.LLE:L
Lr
l« Aluminum2- Chromium3- Barium4. Beryllium5. Cobalt6< Copoer7. Iron2. Nickel9. Mar.Kanese
I* Arsenic2. Antimonv3. Selenium&. ThaUium
COMMENTS:
10.11 .12.13.
•
TASK 2 (Elements to be Idenus/I or mg/l<g(circle one)
^ ^ ^«6.7.S.
TASK 3 (EIcCTWita to be Men
|< Ammonia2- Cyanide3. SuUlde
Zir^:BoronVanadium— ———"—————————'——————tA-—Silver ^
v-0/^
txiied and Measured)uz/l or mgAg(circle one)
MercurvTinCadmiumLead
titled and Measured)ug/l or mg/kg(circle one)
WYCW D4P4[ t^-iAtt* itiul pfinrtiflfttt-m. iBr.
000966