inequality of educational_opportunity_in_higher_education
TRANSCRIPT
Graduate School of Social Sciences
Msc International Development Studies
Master’s Thesis
Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education
São Paulo, Brazil
Michal Ragowan
January 2013
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 2
Cover photo: Classroom of the public secondary school E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin in São Paulo, Brazil
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 3
Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher
Education
São Paulo, Brazil
Michal Ragowan
Student number: 10156984
Supervisor: Dr. Xavier Bonal Sarró
Second assessor: Drs. Margriet Poppema
Amsterdam, January 2013
Master’s Thesis
Msc International Development Studies
Graduate School of Social Sciences
University of Amsterdam
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 4
Supervisor
Dr. Xavier Bonal Sarró
Sociology, Anthropology and International Development Studies
Graduate School of Social Sciences
University of Amsterdam
Plantage Muidergracht 14
1018 TV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.uva.nl/over-de-uva/organisatie/medewerkers/content/b/o/f.x.bonal/f.x.bonal.html
Second Assessor
Drs. Margriet F. Poppema
Senior Lecturer International Development Studies
Human Geography, Planning and International Development Studies (GPIO)
Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences (FMG)
University of Amsterdam
Plantage Muidergracht 14
1018 TV Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Phone: 020-5255035 / 020-5257409
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.uva.nl/profiel/m.f.poppema
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 5
Abstract
In Brazil, the educational system acts as an elitist entity which serves students from high-income classes.
Therefore, the structural inequalities present throughout the country are reflected in the area of education
as well. Public education at primary and secondary educational levels is of poor quality. Here the pupils
do not receive the necessary preparation for the entrance exam of a public university. Conversely, pupils
who have the privilege to attend private primary and secondary schools are sufficiently prepared and
succeed in entering a public university. In Brazil, at the higher educational level, public universities are
of much better quality than private universities. Pupils who attend public schools are left with the
educational opportunity of attending low-cost private universities. The purpose of this research was to
explore how socio-economic factors influence the access of low- to middle-income students to public
higher educational institutions. Additionally, the aim was to research the educational experience of
students from low- to middle-income classes who are attending low-cost private universities. Moreover,
the aim was to explore the quality of low-cost private universities and the perceptions and expectations of
the students in reference to their educational opportunities.
The research took place in São Paulo, Brazil, where I conducted 22 semi-structured in-depth
qualitative interviews. I interviewed 22 students from the following different low-cost private
universities: Centro Universitário Sant’anna (Unisant’anna), Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove),
Universidade Paulista (Unip) in São Paulo and Ribeirão Preto and, finally, Centro Universitário
Anhanguera de São Paulo (Anhanguera). Additionally, I conducted participatory research activities with
children, ranging from 16 to 21, at three different public secondary schools in São Paulo. For this, I
visited the following secondary schools: E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin, E.E. Augusto Meirelles Reis Filho
and E.E. Casimiro de Abreu.
Key words: privatization; higher education; educational opportunities; inequality; São Paulo.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 6
Acknowledgements
I very much enjoyed conducting this research in São Paulo, Brazil, and there are several people who I
would like to acknowledge and thank, because they helped me in one way or another during this research.
First of all, I would like to acknowledge and thank my supervisor, Dr. Xavier Bonal Sarró. He helped me
find my respondents and guided me through the entire process from the field to the thesis writing.
Additionally, I would like to thank my family who supported me through this research. I would like to
thank my translator, Leonel Marini, who helped me with the translations during the first ten interviews. I
also want to thank Maria Antonieta Penido, who welcomed me to her home and helped me get to know
São Paulo. Moreover, I want to thank Mara Paulini Machado who invited me to stay at the house of her
aunt and uncle during my stay in São Paulo.
Furthermore, I would like to thank Camilla Croso who referred me to Romualdo Portelo and José
Marcelino Rezende Pinto from Universidade Paulista. Moreover, I would like to thank Romualdo
Portelo who introduced me to Carlos Bauer from Uninove and Renata Marcilio Candido from
Anhanguera. These professors provided me with the contact information of several of their students.
Additionally, I would like to thank José Marcelino Rezende Pinto who referred me to Ana Paula Leivar
Brancaleoni from Unip in Ribeirão Preto. Thanks to Ana Paula and her sister Renata Brancaleoni, who
helped me with translations, I was able to conduct six interviews in Riberão Preto with the students from
Unip. Moreover, I would like to thank George Longhitano from Unisant’anna for introducing me to his
students. Of course, I would like to thank all the students who participated in the interviews and who
spared an hour of their time to help me in this research. Especially, I would like to thank Guilherme Reis
who invited me to visit the three public secondary schools where he was teaching. Thanks to Guilherme,
I was able to visit these schools and get a first-hands impression of the quality of public education at
primary and secondary levels. This was quite an experience.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 7
Table of Contents
Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………..5
Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………....6
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………………………….......7
Glossary………………………………………………………………………………………………..9
1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..10
2. Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………………………………...12
2.1. Globalization agenda…………………………………………………………………………...12
2.2. Processes of privatization………………………………………………………………………12
2.2.1. Privatization of education……………………………………………………………....13
2.3. Effects on educational policy…………………………………………………………………...15
2.4. Educational opportunities………………………………………………………………………16
2.5. Equity and the reproduction of inequalities..…………………………………………………...18
2.6. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...20
3. Research Methodology…………………………………………………………………………….21
3.1. Research questions……………………………………………………………………………...21
3.2. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………21
3.3. Units of analysis………………………………………………………………………………...23
3.4. Methods…………………………………………………………………………………………23
3.5. Limitations and ethics……...……………………………………………………………………27
3.6. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………28
4. Context: Introducing São Paulo, Brazil…………………………………………………………..29
4.1. Socio-economic background........................................................................................................29
4.2. Educational policy in Brazil…………………………………………………………………….33
4.3. Sistema educacional Brasileiro…………………………………………………………………35
4.4. Accessibility to higher education……………………………………………………………….40
4.5. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………45
5. The Influence of Socio-Economic Factors………………………………………………………...46
5.1. Real opportunities of students from low- to middle-income classes……………………………46
5.1.1. Doing a pré-vestibular or cursinho……………………………………………………...47
5.1.2. Introducing low-cost private universities………………………………………………..49
5.1.3. Applying for a bolsa……………………………………………………………………..53
5.2. Influence of socio-economic factors on access………………………………………………….55
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 8
5.2.1. Parental influence………………………………………………………………………..55
5.2.2. Household income……………………………………………………………………….58
5.2.3. Previous schools…………………………………………………………………………60
6. The Educational Experience and Expectations…………………………………………………...67
6.1. Conditions under which the educational experience takes place………………………………...67
6.1.1. Maintaining a job………………………………………………………………………...67
6.1.2. Attending classes at night………………………………………………………………..67
6.1.3. Minimum grade average to maintain bolsa……………………………………………...68
6.2. Quality of low-cost private universities…………………………………………………………69
6.2.1. Evaluation of the quality………………………………………………………………...69
6.2.2. Perceptions of the educational experience and quality………………………………….76
6.3. Expectations regarding further educational and professional opportunities…………………….78
6.3.1. Further educational opportunities……………………………………………………….78
6.3.2. Further professional opportunities………………………………………………………78
6.3.3. Inequalities………………………………………………………………………………80
7. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………...82
7.1. Findings of the research……………………………………………………………………83
7.2. Reflection on the methodology…………………………………………………………….85
7.3. Suggestions for further study………………………………………………………………85
Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………………87
Appendix I: Interview Guide………………………………………………………………………….93
Appendix II: Overview Respondents…………………………………………………………………96
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 9
Glossary
Bolsa Scholarship
CAPES Foundation Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Educational
Personnel, linked to the Ministry of Education
CNPq National Council of Scientific and Technological Development,
linked to the Ministry of Science and Technology
Concurso público Public examination in order to work in a public area
Cursinho / Pré-vestibular Preparatory course to prepare students for the vestibular and in
some cases for the ENEM exam
Educacão de Jovens e Adultos (EJA) Education for both youth as adults, where students can complete
their primary and secondary schooling (previously referred to as
supletivo)
Educação professional (nível técnico) Professional education (technical course) of two years, usually
done after secondary school
ENADE National Survey of Student Performance
ENEM Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (National Examination of
Secondary Education)
Ensino fundamental Primary school
Ensino médio Secondary school
Ensino superior Higher education
FIES Student Financing Programme (loan scheme)
FUNDEB Fund for the Maintenance and Development of Basic Education
and Enhancement of Educational Professionals
FUNDEF Fund for Maintenance and Development of the Fundamental
Education and Valorization of Teaching
Ministério da Educação (MEC) Ministry of Education
Particular Private
ProUni University for All Programme (scholarship programme)
Pública Public
Supletivo Education for both youth as adults (now called EJA)
Vale refeição Meal allowance or meal voucher
Vestibular Entrance exam of higher educational institutions
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 10
1. Introduction
In Brazil, the segregated educational system causes for an unjust distribution of educational opportunities.
The educational system in Brazil offers more and better quality education to children from the more
affluent classes of society. Conversely, poor families, who often have a different cultural, ethnic and
linguistic background, have less educational opportunities and receive education of inferior quality.
In Brazil today, processes of capitalist expansion are derived from neoliberal policies. These
processes have caused for the area of education to increasingly become a space open to the rules and
regulations of the market. Moreover, the current globalization agenda has greatly affected global and
national policies, impacting educational development and equity. The expansion of capitalist and market-
led economies and the decentralization of the state have resulted in processes of privatization and the
increasing expansion of private schools. The privatization of education has caused for educational
reform, affecting educational policies. Moreover, the privatization of education has greatly affected the
educational opportunities of students from low- to middle-income classes.
Furthermore, in reference to the privatization of education, higher education has become a great
field of interest for profit-seeking business. Educational policies, such as the Global Campaign for
Educational for All (EFA) and the Millennium Development Goal Two to achieve universal primary
education, focus on sending all children to primary and sometimes secondary schools. Moreover, the
little budget governments have for education is primarily devoted to primary education. Therefore, the
gap of investment in higher education is filled by private investors.
In the case of Brazil, private schools at primary and secondary educational levels are of much
better quality than public schools. Therefore, children from the more affluent classes of society are sent
to private primary and secondary schools. Conversely, at the higher educational level, public universities
are considered more prestigious and of much better quality than private universities. To enter these
public universities, the student must pass the vestibular, which is the entrance exam. This exam is to such
an extent difficult that usually only children pass, who have attended private primary and secondary
schools. Contradicting, children from low- to middle-income classes who do not share the privilege of
attending private schools generally do not pass the vestibular. This leaves the students from low- to
middle-income classes with the educational opportunity of attending low-cost private universities, but
most of these students do not have the economic conditions to pay for tuition fees. Some students
manage to obtain a scholarship which enables them to attend a low-cost private university. Nevertheless,
the education at these universities is of inferior quality in comparison to the quality of education at public
universities. Therefore, access to good quality education and the unjust distribution of educational
opportunities are pressing issues in Brazil. Moreover, the Brazilian educational system serves the affluent
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 11
classes of society, greatly reflecting the inequalities present throughout the social-, political- and
economic system in Brazil.
At the start of the sugar production in the coastal areas of Brazil, which made use of slave labor,
the means of production were controlled by a small group of owners. The colonial period lasted from
1500 to 1822 and focused on the accumulation of wealth based on property. In agriculture, there was a
significant growth in productivity, but the great concentration of land ownership prevented the
democratization of possession of the land (CEBRAP 2012: 15). This “led to extreme exploitation of
workers in the absence of social policies, dragging down standards of living in the countryside.”
(CEBRAP 2012: 15) As a result, mass migration occurred as people moved to the city in the search of
employment and opportunities. This caused for a transformation of Brazil towards urbanization, initiating
the industrialization, which lasted from 1930 to 1980. Conversely, these changes did not bring about a
just and democratic society. “It became an authentically capitalist inequality, tied to monetary wealth,
which exploited differences of region, race/color and gender to create a working class, in which the
majority of its members did not have social and labor rights.” (CEBRAP 2012: 13) Moreover, by the
1980s the economic growth had stalled, poverty grew and inequality became more pronounced, marking
the beginning of the crisis. However, with this also came an end to the military regime and the
establishment of the Brazilian Federal Constitution as of 1988, introducing the first steps towards a
democracy. The structural causes of inequality are embedded in Brazil’s historic trajectory, “producing
exclusion and contributing to wealth concentration in the hands of the few” (CEBRAP 2012: 3). “Poverty
in Brazil remains high and social inequality in the country reaches extreme levels.” (CEBRAP 2012: 23)
Moreover, “Brazil remains among the five most unequal countries in the world” (IMF 2011).
This thesis is divided into seven chapters. Now I will discuss the theoretical framework, which
are the theories and the academic debate in which I placed my research. I will then discuss the research
methodology and explain which methods I used and the reasons behind this. Furthermore, I will discuss
the context and my empirical findings. The following two chapters will discuss the data collected in São
Paulo. Finally, I will complete this thesis with a conclusion.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 12
2. Theoretical Framework
In this chapter, I will draw upon theories regarding the globalization agenda and the processes of
privatization. Additionally, I will look at the privatization of education and the effects on educational
policy more specifically. I wish to challenge the assumed positive effects of the privatization of
education on educational expansion and quality. Furthermore, I will discuss how the privatization of
education and the expansion of private schools affect educational opportunities. Finally, I will touch
upon the concept of equity and show how the privatization of education contributes to the reproduction of
inequalities.
2.1. Globalization agenda
Dale (1999) discusses the political aspect of the globalization agenda and states’ reactions to changing
circumstances. Individually, states’ responses to changing global realities evolve around making
themselves more competitive (Dale 1999: 4). Collectively, states have become more concerned in setting
an international framework of large international organizations, the most prominent being the
International Monetary Fund, the OECD and the World Bank. Through this international framework,
states seek to establish ‘governance without government’ (Rosenau 1992 in Dale 1999: 4). The common
ideology which drives these organizations to enhance in policy changes within this set international
framework is described by John Williamson (1993) in his ‘Washington Consensus’1. Williamson
emphasizes ten features of the ‘Washington Consensus’, including among others, public expenditure
priorities, financial and trade liberalization, foreign direct investment, deregulation and privatization.
(Dale 1999: 4) Together these processes act as “the preferred ideological filters that inform the directions
in which national policy decisions are to be shaped” (Dale 1999: 4).
Conversely, it is important to keep in mind the fact that “external policies are likely to be
differently interpreted and differently acted on in different countries” (Dale 1999: 5).
2.2. Processes of privatization
Among the features of the ‘Washington Consensus’ described by Williamson (1993) is privatization.
Therefore, processes of privatization are part of the globalization agenda. Moreover, Dale (1999)
discusses the variety of mechanisms which influence national policies and through which the effects of
globalization are delivered. One of these mechanisms is privatization.
1 Williamson, J. (1993) Democracy and the `Washington Consensus’, World Development, 21(8), 1329- 1336
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 13
It is argued that privatization takes place to make up for the lack of the public sector. Ball (2010)
argues that “privatization is attractive to governments and to multi-lateral agencies as ‘solutions’ to the
‘problem’ of public-sector reform (with the promise of increasing productivity, introducing innovations
and reducing costs) and is a new (and relatively safe) profit opportunity for capital (large and small)
particularly at a time when other areas of business activity are in recession” (Ball 2010: 229).
Furthermore, in Brazil, “privatization was considered a key element in the process of
restructuring the economy” (IHEP 2009: 4) after the economic crisis. The government implemented
several plans to reverse the economic crisis, including fiscal adjustment, control of inflation,
modernization of domestic industry and privatization. Privatization was successful in some sectors, such
as power companies, banks and telecommunications, but became very unpopular in Brazil. Privatization
brought unemployment and few benefits as the people “paid more taxes and higher prices for services”
(IHEP 2009: 4).
Moreover, with the emergence of privatization processes, education became more and more a
field for private investors who seek to make profit. These investors ‘sell’ education as a commodity,
which is sensitive to competition and commercialization. Ball and Youdell (2008) explain this when
saying: “privatization tendencies are at the centre of the shift from education being seen as a public good
that serves the whole community, to education being seen as a private good that serves the interest of the
educated individual, the employer and the economy.” (Ball & Youdell 2008: 15-6)
2.2.1. Privatization of education
Now I will discuss the privatization of education more specifically. Current neoliberal policies, set within
the context of the globalization agenda, focus on the expansion of capitalism and market-led economies,
the deregulation of state power and the privatization of the public sector. Additionally, these policies
have led to the privatization in and of public education.
Furthermore, the privatization of education is based on the argument that the educational system
as provided by the state is of low quality. Therefore, the ‘solution’ could be found in the privatization of
education. In other words, this means opening education up to the norms and values of the market, “to
parental choice and competition between schools for student recruitment, and to allow new providers,
including for-profit providers, to operate alongside or within the state school system” (Ball & Youdell
2008: 14).
Additionally, it is argued that the public sector should not be responsible for all aspects of
education. Four main reasons are argued here advocating for the privatization of education. Firstly, the
effectiveness and efficiency of public education is questioned. Secondly, the equity and accountability of
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 14
public education is questioned, particularly affecting the poor. Thirdly, the increase of initiatives of
educational entrepreneurs raised awareness of the significant educational improvements which could be
the result of competitive pressures. Finally, it is necessary to find alternative sources of educational
funding in order to restrain public expenditure and reduce budget deficits and external debts.2
Furthermore, privatization interprets education as a market-oriented commodity. Privatization
understands education as a competitive, private good, which benefits solely the individual and stimulates
competitive individualism. This ignores the idea of international or collective solidarity where the
investment in education results in rates of return which benefit the whole of society and not merely the
individual. Moreover, the idea behind the privatization of education is primarily derived from the concept
of choice. Choice is then facilitated by initiatives to diversify the provision of local education through
different mechanisms: “per-capita funding; the devolution of management responsibilities and budgets to
schools; the provision of school ‘vouchers’ for use in public or private schools; the relaxation of
enrollment regulations; and the publication of ‘performance outcomes’ as a form of market ‘information’
for parent-choosers” (Ball & Youdell 2008: 18). Finally, competition is meant to raise the standards
across the educational system.
Additionally, Ball (2005) argues that processes of privatization resulted in three major re-
orientations of educational values. Firstly, privatization resulted in an increased emphasis on outcomes.
Secondly, it has caused for a shift in direction towards obligations, namely obligations towards sponsors,
funders and/or ‘partners’. Lastly, privatization has lead to “the cultivation/valorization of ‘new’
dispositions – e.g., enterprise, competitiveness, commercialism, the skills of selling and spinning” (Ball
2005: 121). To sum up, the privatization of education caused for an orientation towards “personal and
institutional success and rewards […] over and against whatever we take ‘teacherly’, scholarly or
collegial virtues to be” (Ball 2005: 121).
Furthermore, in Brazil, neoliberal policies were introduced by the World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund after the crisis. These policies affected Brazil’s government policies and
transformed its educational system. (Hackshaw 2008) This resulted in the implementation of privatization
policies in higher education to increase enrollment (Pinto 2004: abstract). Moreover, “between 1995 and
2005, the number of institutions in the private sector increased by 182 percent” (IHEP 2009: 4). Several
factors influenced this expansion of private institutions in higher education. Firstly, the idea was to raise
the percentage of adolescents between the ages of 18 and 24 who attend undergraduate programmes at the
university from 12 to 30 percent by 2015, through the expansion of private institutions. Additionally, the
government implemented the Education act of 1996, which made the process of accreditation and
2 http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2015/Government-Education-Changing-Role.html (Accessed
24/05/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 15
licensing more flexible with as result the creation of 1,297 new institutions between 1998 and 2006.
Moreover, “other factors contributed to the expansion of the private sector, including the stagnation of
state investment in public universities during the 1990s, the growth of enrollment at the secondary level,
and increased demand for higher education in the job market.” (IHEP 2009: 12) Conversely, the
enrollment rate in higher education remains low, leading to “an overall elitization of the profile of
students, especially in the fields with the highest demand and in private institutions, where the presence of
African-descendant or poor students is still very low” (Pinto 2004: abstract).
2.3. Effects on educational policy
Bonal (2004) argues the following in reference to the effects of globalization on education: “the indirect
effects of globalization on education are undeniable: restrictions in public spending, changes in the
structure of qualifications and their remuneration, an increase in the demand for higher education,
changes in the patterns of demand for education (particularly among the middle classes) and the search
for quality and differences in education, etc.” (Bonal 2004: 664).
In Brazil, the effects of the globalization agenda and the processes of privatization led to
educational reform in higher education. The Brazilian educational system shifted from an elite public
system to a more diversified system in which private higher educational institutions play a significant
role. McCowan (2007) explains that some of these private higher educational institutions cater for
wealthy elites, however, “a growing number target lower-income students who are unable to enter the
selective public universities” (McCowan 2007: 580). Conversely, McCowan argues that it remains to be
seen whether the increase in private higher educational institutions represents a feasible solution to the
pressing need to expand the higher educational system, “while at the same time maintains teaching and
research of a high quality” (McCowan 2007: 580).
Furthermore, Ribeiro (2005) argues that in Brazil, “where the degree of income concentration is
scandalous, the decreasing capacity of public services surely represents another step in this profoundly
deepening inequality” (Ribeiro 2005: 3). He argues that, in the last decade, the public higher educational
system was mostly affected by neoliberal policies based on the ‘Washington Consensus’ (Ribeiro 2005).
Moreover, McCowan (2007) states that in Brazil, under the rule of Cardoso (1995-2002) an educational
reform programme was implemented, following recommendations of the World Bank, which reduced
public spending and increased private involvement in all areas. (McCowan 2007: 584)
Additionally, “the changing economic and social environment in the 1990s put new pressures on
the Brazilian higher education system” (IHEP 2009: 7). The job market changed and the demand for
quality control of undergraduate programmes increased, especially in private universities. Therefore, the
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 16
government adopted new approaches to assure the provision of higher quality undergraduate education at
private institutions. From 1995 to 2002, the Ministry of Education implemented the National Evaluation
of Undergraduate Programmes (ENADE), which measures the performance of the students and ranks the
universities. Moreover, in 2003, the new administration created a new evaluation system, consisting of an
internal evaluation (a council of students, faculty and employees) and an external evaluation (expert
evaluators assigned by the Federal Council of Education). (IHEP 2009: 7)
Also, in Brazil, at the higher educational level, public universities are of the best quality. Public
universities are usually supported by the federal government, however, there are also public universities
funded by the state, such as in the state of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. In the last twenty or thirty years,
the privatization of higher education in Brazil has resulted in a strong increase in the number of
faculdades, that is, “small institutions offering primarily professional degree programs and a few
undergraduate courses” (Ribeiro 2005: 3). Ribeiro argues that this is the result of a complex combination
of several closely related factors. Firstly, Ribeiro mentions the implementation of neoliberal policies,
often recommended to the state by multilateral agencies, which are aimed at opening up the economic
sector of education to entrepreneurs. Secondly, the public universities could not grow and accept the
increasing number of students completing secondary school due to the reduction in funds allocated to the
public universities. Lastly, entrepreneurs become more and more aware of the extremely profitable
business higher education could be. (Ribeiro 2005: 3)
To sum up, Brazil has been very sensitive to the globalization agenda and the processes of
privatization, resulting in the reform of educational policies. I will now discuss the effects this has on the
educational opportunities of students.
2.4. Educational opportunities
Privatization has several effects on the educational opportunities of students. Firstly, privatization could
lead to exclusion, because, in the context of the neoliberal paradigm, privatization forces the economy to
integrate and compete in the global chain of production and distribution. This is the ‘open’ global market
which “can offer opportunities for growth, but also exploitation in a marginalized position” (Andriesse et
al. 2011: 6).
Additionally, the value of education in general decreased due to the processes of globalization
and the mass expansion of education. This resulted in the social segmentation of children from the
middle- or higher-classes of society and children from the low-income classes. Furthermore, this resulted
in the public-private segmentation of educational institutions. Moreover, Bonal (2007) argues that the
middle classes, when potentially facing the devaluation of the educational capital they have acquired,
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 17
search for ways to distinguish themselves on the basis of quality differences (Bonal 2007: 90). In the case
of Brazil, when students from low-income classes do not have access to public universities, they are left
with the educational opportunity of attending a low-cost private university. That is, if these students can
afford the tuition fees. This allows the students from the affluent classes of society to raise the quality
standards of their educational capital within the public university, hereby reducing the quality of low-cost
private universities. Furthermore, this leaves no space to vindicate the public school system at primary
and secondary educational levels, because the poor usually do not have a voice to fight for the quality of
these schools, or are not listened to. As such, inequalities are reproduced and the gap between the poor
and rich becomes larger.
Furthermore, the privatization of education includes the implementation of several techniques to
ensure performance management and accountability different than public-sector education. These
techniques, such as performance-related pay, are introduced from business into the public sector of
education to ensure the quality of education and to make the educational processes more transparent and
accountable. Conversely, these techniques and strategies can also have large effects on the way schools
and teachers prioritize and value their educational system within a classroom. (Ball & Youdell 2008: 24)
Additionally, new strategies are implemented to measure the quality of educational institutions through
standardized testing, such as PISA. These new strategies, implemented in private schools to ensure the
quality and performance, actually lead to a reorientation in priorities focusing away from high quality
education.
Moreover, practices of commercialization or the ‘cola-isation’ of schools in the United States “are
so normalized that their role in the privatization of education can go unrecognized” (Ball & Youdell 2008:
38). This refers to commercial companies targeting children and young adolescent consumers at schools,
promoting their products and brands. This is yet again another focus of private schools away from what
should be the schools’ genuine goal; that is, to ensure access and provide high quality education.
Finally, Ball & Youdell (2008) discuss philanthropy or ‘philantrocapitalism’ as the idea that
charity resembles a capitalist economy in which those who award a benefit become a consumer of social
investment. In spite of the improvement in educational provision which could be the result of such
strategic interventions, the flow of these educational ‘subsidies’ can serve to intensify existing inequalities
in educational provision (Ball & Youdell 2008: 40).
In Brazil, educational opportunities are unequally distributed in relation to accessing public or
private educational institutions. At primary and secondary educational levels, private schools are of better
quality and are attended by children from the affluent classes of society. In contrary, at the higher
educational level, public universities are considered more prestigious and of better quality. However,
public universities are also attended by students from the high-income classes of society as these students
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 18
have a better educational background and have received a better preparation in relation to the entrance
exam. Therefore, the educational system of Brazil serves the wealthy, providing students from high-
income classes with access to good quality education. This leads me to discuss the concept of equity and
the reproduction of inequalities.
2.5. Equity and the reproduction of inequalities
Now I will briefly discuss the concept of equity. McCowan (2004) describes the different possible
definitions of the concept of equity. McCowan (2004) states:
The policies of the World Bank for higher education are designed to promote economic development with
equity. The Bank’s report on higher education in Brazil states:
Equity can mean different things, for example: (i) a reasonable degree of equality of opportunity to
participate in higher education, and (ii) a reasonable and fair balance between paying the costs and
obtaining the benefits from higher education (World Bank 2001: 41).
A less problematic definition of equity in education is that of Brighouse (2002), namely that those
“with similar levels of ability and willingness to exert effort should face similar educational prospects
regardless of their social background, ethnicity or sex” (Brighouse, 2002, p.10). (McCowan 2004: 459)
The discussion regarding the definition of equity is endless and I do not wish to focus on this in this
thesis. I will continue to discuss how the privatization of education affects educational opportunities and
results in the reproduction of inequalities.
Firstly, Tarabini (2010) argues that the global agenda leaves out strategies used by middle-classes
to differentiate themselves in order to maintain the highest value of their educational capital.
Globalization, leading to the devaluation of returns to education, therefore, creates a “growing
competition between individuals for access to the most prestigious kind of schooling and to the best
places in the occupational structure, thus, leading to a reinforcement of inequalities in educational
opportunities” (Brown 2003 in Tarabini 2010: 210). This results in an unequal distribution of the
possibilities to invest in education and creates unequal possibilities to retrieve the benefits that the
investment in education promises. (Tarabini 2010: 210)
Furthermore, Carnoy (1995) argues that John Ambler’s analysis of school-choice plans3 shows
that “the primary negative effect of school choice is its natural tendency to increase the educational gap
between the privileged and the underprivileged” (Carnoy 1995: 52). Providing subsidies for private
education would benefit higher-income families more than others. Moreover, Carnoy (1995) discusses
Chile as case study and the results of the voucher plan introduced in the 1980s under Pinochet. Firstly,
3 John Ambler (1994) ‘Who Benefits From Educational Choice? Some Evidence From Europe’, Journal of Policy
Analysis and Management
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 19
total spending on education fell; secondly, “those who took advantage of the subsidized private schools
were predominantly middle- and higher-income families” (Carnoy 1995: 52); and finally, the increase in
pupil achievement predicted by the voucher plan never occurred. In conclusion, “voucher plans increase
inequality without making schools better. Even more significantly, privatization reduces the public effort
to improve schooling since it relies on the free market to increase achievement, but the increase never
occurs.” (Carnoy 1995: 52)
Additionally, Bonal (2004) argues as well that processes of educational expansion involve risks
of inequality: “the clearest risk was that decisions regarding priorities and the allocation of resources were
made in favour of those who had a greater capacity to voice their demands and apply pressure to ensure
their satisfaction” (Tedesco & Lopez 2002 in Bonal 2004: 657). Moreover, he discusses social
polarization, because “the increase in access and attention to groups previously excluded from education
tended to result in the withdrawal of the middle-classes from public education and an increase in demand
in the private sector” (Bonal 2004: 657). “Decentralization has, therefore, intensified the inequality
between schools.” (Espinola 1997 in Bonal 2004: 663)
Furthermore, Härmä (2009) discusses low-fee private (LFP) schools in India and concludes that
“those with fewer socio-economic resources find it extremely difficult to access LFP schooling” (Härmä
2009: 164). Moreover, “placing increased reliance on LFP schools will run the risk of further polarizing
society with the poorest remaining poor” (Härmä 2009: 164).
As Stromquist indicated, “it is not that families are poor because they have no education, it is
rather that they have no education because they are poor” (Stromquist 2001 in Bonal 2004: 658).
In the case of Brazil, the government discourages some forms of privatization, due to the negative
perception of its policies in the 1990s. For instance, the government discourages the reduction of state
investment, the introduction of tuition fees in the public sector and private investments in the public
sector. Conversely, the government has encouraged the expansion and rise of the private sector, by
implementing policies which increased access to private institutions by low-income students. “However,
many groups have criticized these policies because they do not foster social equality; low-income students
attend private institutions, which have high tuition fees and low quality, while high-income students
receive a better education in public institutions.” (IHEP 2009: 7-8)
2.6. Conclusion
In conclusion, in this theoretical framework I touched upon theories in relation to the globalization agenda
and the processes of privatization. Moreover, I showed how the privatization of education is derived from
neoliberal policies and a focus on the expansion of capitalist and market-led economies. More
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 20
specifically, I looked at the privatization of education and its influence on educational policies. I briefly
explained the arguments used to advocate for the privatization of education, but I showed the effects of
the privatization of education on educational opportunities as well. Lastly, I discussed the concept of
equity and the contribution of the privatization of education to the reproduction of inequalities.
In the next chapter I will discuss the methodological framework of this research in further detail.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 21
3. Research Methodology
In this chapter I will discuss the methodological framework of this research. Firstly, I will discuss the
central research question and sub-questions and then I will talk about the research methodology.
Additionally, I will discuss the units of analysis, the methods I used for this research, the sampling
methods and the methods of analysis. Furthermore, I will discuss the limitations and ethical
considerations. Finally, I will conclude this chapter.
3.1. Research questions
I based my central research question on the literature and the theories I described in the theoretical
framework and on my empirical findings, which I will discuss in the following chapter. Moreover, the
access to good quality education, that is, private schools at primary and secondary educational levels and
public universities at the higher educational level, is a severe problem in the case of Brazil, particularly
for those from low- to middle-income classes. Therefore, my central research question is: What are the
educational opportunities of students from low- to middle-income classes in relation to higher
education in the state of São Paulo, Brazil?
Furthermore, to answer this research question, my sub-questions are as follows:
1. Which real educational opportunities do students from low- to middle-income classes have in
reference to attending university?
2. Which social and economic factors influence the access of students from low- to middle-income
classes to public higher educational institutions?
3. Under which conditions does the educational experience of students at low-cost private
universities take place?
4. What is the quality of the low-cost private universities and what perceptions do the students have
of their educational experience and the quality?
5. What are the expectations of the students at low-cost private universities in reference to their
further educational and professional opportunities?
3.2. Methodology
For this research I made use of the mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and participatory
methods. As qualitative method I made use of semi-structured in-depth interviews and as participatory
methods I made use of participant observation and participatory research activities. I will discuss these
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 22
methods later on in this chapter. The idea behind using different methods for the research, in other words,
the idea behind triangulation, is that “if the same conclusion is reached from each of the approaches,
greater confidence exists that conclusion is valid” (Sumner & Tribe 2008: 108-9). This is needed to
check the credibility of the data collected, that is, the extent to which the data collected is believable or
considered true. Additionally, the use of these different methods helps to ensure other quality criteria in
international development studies, such as the dependability of the data collected, that is, that the data
collected is consistent and repeatable. Furthermore, this is to check the transferability, that is, if the
findings are applicable in other contexts. Lastly, auditability entails a transparent description of all steps
taken from the start of the research to the development and reporting of findings.
Now I will discuss the ontology and epistemology behind the research. Firstly, ontology is the nature of
reality itself, whereas epistemology is the nature of knowledge itself (Sumner & Tribe 2008: 55).
Moreover, “ontology is best described as a theory or set of assumptions concerning what ‘exists’ and thus
what is and what is ‘knowable’?” (Summer & Tribe 2008: 55). This research was done from the
ontological perspective of constructivism, which “describes the individual human subject engaging with
objects in the world and making sense of them” (Crotty 1998: 79).
Furthermore, Crotty (1998) describes constructivism as meaning which is constructed by minds;
there is no objective and only truth to be discovered, but, “truth, or meaning, comes into existence in and
out of our engagement with the realities in our world” (Crotty 1998: 8). As such, different people
construct meaning in different ways, even in relation to the same phenomena. In this view, Crotty argues,
“subject and object emerge as partners in the generation of meaning” (Crotty 1998: 9).
In reference to this research, a constructivist ontology attempts to explain how different social
actors, or the different students, construct different meanings of a phenomenon. In this case, the
phenomenon could be the access to higher education, which is part of reality.
Secondly, epistemology is thus the nature of knowledge itself. Moreover, it is defined as “a set of
assumptions concerning how we can ‘know’ that which ‘exists’” (Sumner & Tribe 2008: 55). The
epistemological background of this fieldwork can be described as realist, meaning that “there is a
physical reality which exists independently of our cognition but that we cannot appraise it – we can only
describe it due to the fact that we are dependent observers – and we are not independent of events. Thus
knowledge is a social construct, but one which aims to explain a physical reality” (Molteberg &
Bergstrom 2000 in Sumner & Tribe 2008: 63).
In the epistemological assumption of realism, reality is that “which exists independently of the
researcher and which can be described” (Sumner & Tribe 2008: 59). The aim of conducting research is to
describe this reality, because there is not solely one objective truth about reality. Additionally, “the
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 23
researcher and their thoughts are part of reality; the researcher is a dependent observer” (Sumner & Tribe
2008: 59). As the researcher and his or her thoughts are part of reality, one is automatically subjective,
however transparent about this.
In relation to the research, as researcher, I aimed to describe a reality, of which I form part. The
reality could be the rapid expansion of low-cost private universities and the inequalities present in the
educational system. Moreover, I aimed to describe this reality and the different meanings of its effect on
educational opportunities, as constructed by the different actors or students.
3.3. Units of analysis
This research predominantly aims to understand the educational opportunities, experience and perceptions
of students attending low-cost private universities. Therefore, there is one main unit of analysis, namely
the low-cost private universities. Moreover, of the different low-cost private universities present in São
Paulo, Brazil, I chose to focus my research on the following universities: Unisant’anna, Uninove
(Universidade Nove de Julho), Unip (Universidade Paulista), in the municipality of São Paulo and
Ribeirão Preto), and Anhanguera (which now has become Universidade Bandeirante de São Paulo or
Uniban).
Furthermore, I attended three public secondary schools, governed by the state of São Paulo, to
better understand the quality of public education at the secondary educational level and the perceptions of
the pupils in relation to attending university. Therefore, the second unit of analysis is the public
secondary schools I visited in São Paulo. The schools I attended are E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin, E.E.
Augusto Meirelles Reis Filho and E.E. Casimiro de Abreu.
3.4. Methods
For this research I made use of a mixed-methods approach as I discussed above. I combined qualitative
and participatory methods during my research. Firstly, I will discuss the qualitative semi-structured in-
depth interviews. Secondly, I will go into more detail concerning the participatory methods I used.
Semi-structured in-depth interviews
For this research, I conducted 22 semi-structured in-depth interviews with students attending the different
low-cost private universities. The interviews were semi-structured, because I made an interview guide
with the set of questions I wanted to ask the respondent and highlighted those which were important to
include in the interview. Conversely, I wanted the respondent to have the space to talk freely when he or
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 24
she wanted to. The interviews were meant to act as life stories or histories, sketching the social and
economic background of the respondent and the path he or she has taken in relation to education.
Furthermore, the majority of the interviews took between one hour and one hour and ten minutes. Other
interviews took between 40 minutes and one hour.
In total, I conducted four interviews with students from Uninove. Additionally, I conducted nine
interviews with students from Unisant’anna and one interview with a student from Anhanguera.
Furthermore, I conducted two interviews with students from Unip in São Paulo and another six interviews
with students from Unip in Ribeirão Preto. Moreover, I conducted three interviews with professors from
the universities Anhanguera, Uninove and Unisant’anna, but eventually I did not use these data for the
research. I did not find the data very relevant, as this research is focused on the perceptions, experience
and educational opportunities of the students.
Furthermore, it is important to point out that the interviews were done in Portuguese. A translator
accompanied me to the first ten interviews and translated the questions from English to Portuguese and
the answers from the respondents from Portuguese to English. I conducted the other six interviews in the
city of São Paulo alone. Moreover, during five of the six interviews I conducted in Ribeirão Preto,
Renata Brancaleoni helped me with the translations.
Participatory research methods
I also visited three public secondary schools during my time in São Paulo to get a better understanding of
the quality of public education at the secondary educational level and the lack of preparation for the
vestibular of a university. Furthermore, I wanted to get a better impression regarding the educational
opportunities and perceptions of the pupils in relation to higher education. I visited the public secondary
school E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin twice. The other two schools, E.E. Augusto Meirelles Reis Filho and
E.E. Casimiro de Abreu, I visited only once.
First visit to Dulce Ferreira Boarin
My first visit to E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin was not planned. I had interviewed a student at Uninove,
Guilherme, and he told me that he was currently teaching at different public schools. He was about to go
to this school to teach and asked me if I wanted to come along and so I did. At the school, I used the
opportunity to interview several of the pupils. In total, there were approximately twelve children in the
classroom. Additionally, I observed as Guilherme asked the children questions and engaged the pupils in
a discussion with each other regarding the quality of public education at the secondary educational level
and the opportunity to attend higher education.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 25
Participatory methods
After my first visit to E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin, Guilherme invited me to visit two other public schools
as well, namely E.E. Augusto Meirelles Reis Filho and E.E. Casimiro de Abreu. Here I organized a
participatory activity to engage the children in the research. However, as I arrived to the schools I
realized that the children were older than I expected. Therefore, instead of the activity I had prepared, I
asked the children to write down what they think of the quality of their school. Moreover, I asked them to
write down how they see themselves in the next five years; what would they be doing and what would be
important for them in the next five years? I quoted several of the writings of the children in the first data-
analysis chapter.
Furthermore, after I had visited the two schools, I returned to E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin one
more time. This time I had prepared the participatory activity and I hoped I would be able to do the
activity with these children. The children of this class are a few years younger than the children from the
other two schools. Therefore, I was able to do the activity very well. Firstly, I asked the children to write
down five things which are the most important for them in the following five years. Then I divided the
class into groups of three to five pupils. I asked them to compare what they had written down and make a
top five of most important things per group. Afterwards I asked each group to share their five most
important things with the rest of the class. I stuck the post-its of each group on the classroom board and
grouped the ones that were similar. Each group explained to the others why these particular things are
important and why one thing is more important than the other. Finally, we ended the activity in a group
discussion. The purpose of this activity was to find out whether the pupils would find education or going
to university as important factors. Moreover, I wanted to find out how important this may be to the
children. I will discuss the findings of this activity in chapter five.
In conclusion, the data I collected by visiting the different public schools complemented the
interviews in such a way that it gave me a better understanding of the quality of public education at
primary and secondary educational levels. Moreover, I became more aware of the real educational
opportunities children from low- to middle-income classes have in relation to receiving good quality
education. Furthermore, it made me realize that the students I interviewed, who are currently attending
the low-cost private universities, are most probable not a real representation of students from low- to
middle-income classes. I believe that the sample of students I interviewed is very determined and has a
strong will to continue studying. Unfortunately, I do not think that most students from low- to middle-
income classes actually have the educational opportunity of even attending the low-cost private
universities.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 26
Participant observation
At the beginning of my stay in São Paulo I attended a meeting on the public-private relations in education
at Unicamp (Universidade Estadual de Campinas), the University of Campinas, in the state of São Paulo.
Unicamp is a public university, provided and maintained by the state of São Paulo. The meeting was
called: ‘Relações público e privado na educação: embates e desdobramentos para a democratização da
educação’. Here Toni Verger spoke about public-private partnerships. I used this meeting as an
opportunity to talk to the different professors present about the higher educational system and the public-
private divide. Furthermore, it was an opportunity for me to make contacts to help me find further
respondents.
Sampling methods
For the interviews, I used non-random or non-probability sampling to find the respondents. More
specifically, I made use of the snowball method. My supervisor provided me with the name of Camilla
Croso from the Global Campaign for Education in São Paulo. She then provided me with the names of
two professors from the public university USP. These professors were then able to help me get into
contact with three other professors from the different low-cost private universities. These professors were
also the professors I interviewed. They then helped me reach most of the students I interviewed.
Moreover, I was able to reach other students through the students I had already interviewed.
Methods of analysis
I used the scientific programme Atlas.ti to analyze the data I collected through the interviews and the
participatory methods. I coded the transcribed and translated interviews in Atlas.ti and made a table in
Excel as an overview of the most important characteristics of the respondents. Moreover, I used quotes
from the interviews to support my interpretation of the data in the data-analysis chapters (chapters five
and six).
Dimensions of analysis
In this analysis, I focused on several dimensions of education, relevant to the inequality of educational
opportunity in the case of Brazil. As derived from the research of Ribeiro (2011), there are several factors
which have a significant influence on the students’ possibility to have access to good quality education
and to progress in education. These factors play a key role in the reproduction of educational inequalities.
Firstly, Ribeiro discusses the factor of parental resources (Ribeiro 2011: 41). Additionally, he discusses
the institutional characteristics of the educational system, which promote inequalities by its own design
(Ribeiro 2011: 44). Thirdly, he discusses the stratification of the Brazilian educational system between
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 27
school types, which differ in quality, as an important factor in determining the inequality of opportunities.
He states that students who attended private primary and secondary education have higher chances of
progressing in the system than those who attend public schools (Ribeiro 2011: 78). Based on these
analytical categories, I formulated my research questions and decided on which factors to focus when
researching the educational opportunities of low-income students in higher education in Brazil.
3.5. Limitations and ethics
In this sub-chapter I will discuss the challenges I encountered during my research. Additionally, I will
briefly discuss some ethical considerations.
Limitations
I encountered several challenges and limitations during my research. Firstly, I did not speak the local
language which made the communication with the respondents more difficult. Initially I was
accompanied to the interviews by a translator who translated the questions and answers for me, which
worked out quite well. Conversely, I was afraid to lose valuable information in the translations.
Afterwards, I did several interviews myself as I become more confident with the Portuguese. This went
well, but there were moments in which I did not fully understand what the respondent was saying.
Secondly, the city of São Paulo was a personal challenge for me. As São Paulo is a very large
metropolitan city, I did not find it easy to travel to and from the interviews. Moreover, I visited the
schools during the evenings and most of the interviews took place at night as well. I did not experience
São Paulo as a safe city to travel great distances alone and after dark.
Ethics
Special attention should be given to ethical considerations. With all the interviews I conducted, I
carefully explained the purpose of my research and the reasons for my stay in São Paulo. I promised the
respondents confidentiality and anonymity. Obviously, the respondent did not have to answer a question
if he or she did not want to. Moreover, I was open to answering any questions from their side. I also
promised the respondents that I would e-mail them my thesis when I have completed it.
Furthermore, I always planned to meet the respondents for the interviews at a time and place
convenient for the respondents. I was careful not to be suggestive in my questions and as objective as
possible during the interview. I aimed to be as transparent and honest about the research as possible.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 28
3.6. Conclusion
In conclusion, this research was carried out using a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and
participatory research methods. For this research I conducted 22 semi-structured, in-depth interviews
with the students of the following different low-cost private universities: Unisant’anna, Uninove
(Universidade Nove de Julho), Unip (Universidade Paulista, in the municipality of São Paulo and
Ribeirão Preto) and Anhanguera (which now has become Universidade Bandeirante de São Paulo or
Uniban). Moreover, I made use of participant observation and I engaged the children of different public
secondary schools in a participatory activity. Furthermore, the schools I visited are E.E. Dulce Ferreira
Boarin, E.E. Augusto Meirelles Reis Filho and E.E. Casimiro de Abreu. Therefore, the units of analysis
for this research are the low-cost private universities and the public secondary schools I visited. In
chapter five and six I will present and discuss the data I collected in São Paulo. Moreover, I will answer
my research questions. Now I will discuss the context of the research location and my empirical findings.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 29
4. Context: Introducing São Paulo, Brazil
In this chapter I will discuss the context of Brazil, São Paulo and Ribeirão Preto. I will briefly discuss the
socio-economic characteristics and then I will focus predominantly on the Brazilian educational system.
Additionally, I will discuss my personal observations and empirical findings in reference to the Brazilian
educational system.
4.1. Socio-economic background
Brazil, officially referred to as the Federative Republic of Brazil, was a colony of Portugal until 1815.
Brazil is the largest country in South-America and it is the world’s fifth largest country, both by
geographical area and by population. Brazil has a population of 196.655 million people as of 20114. It is
also the only Portuguese-speaking country in the Americas.
Brazil is bounded by the Atlantic Ocean on the east and bordered on the north by Venezuela,
Guyana, Suriname and the French overseas region of French Guiana. It is bordered by Colombia on the
northwest, by Bolivia and Peru on the west, by Argentina and Paraguay on the southwest and by Uruguay
on the south. On page 32 you will find a map of Brazil and Latin America (figure 1).
Additionally, the Brazilian economy is the world’s seventh largest with a GDP of $2.4 in trillions
of US Dollars as of 2012, according to the IMF, World Economic Outlook.5 Moreover, the minimum
salary of Brazil today is R$6226 per month, which is an equivalent of USD$298.11 and €226.56.
Furthermore, the Brazilian middle class has increased significantly in the last ten to twenty years,
according to a study conducted by the Brazilian Secretariat of Strategic Affairs. In fact, “Brazil’s
growing middle class is as diverse as Brazil itself, currently accounting for 52 percent of the total
population of the country, with per capita income ranging from R$291.00 to R$1,019.00 per month.”
(Brazilian government 20127) The Brazilian Secretariat of Strategic Affairs states that the increased
participation of the middle class is a key factor in the growth and development of Brazil. Moreover, 35%
of the current Brazilian middle class has entered the middle class in the past ten years. Additionally, 28%
of the population belongs to the lower class, with a monthly household income per capita below
4 World Bank, last updated October 31 2012, Source:
https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_pop_totl&idim=country:BRA&dl=en
&hl=en&q=population%20brazil (Accessed 29/12/2012) 5 Source: http://www.blatantworld.com/feature/the_world/most_populous_metropolitan_areas.html (Accessed
29/12/2012) 6 Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/BZMW:IND (Accessed 16/12/2012)
7 Source: http://www.brasil.gov.br/para/press/press-releases/november-1/brazilian-middle-class-reaches-52-of-total-
population/br_model1?set_language=en (Accessed 31/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 30
R$291.00, and 20% belongs to the upper class. Conversely, “if the same cut-off points per class (R$
291.00 to R$1,019.00) are applied to households worldwide, only 18% of the population is in the upper
class, while 54% is in the lower class.” (Brazilian government 2012)
Moreover, “Brazil is a racially mixed country in which the majority of people have ancestors in
more than one of the three main groups: white Europeans (mostly Portuguese); black Africans (mainly
from the west of the continent); and the original indigenous Indian population.” (Embassy of Brazil in
London) In the first half of the 20th century, as a consequence of war and economic pressures, large
groups of immigrants came to Brazil from various parts of Europe.
São Paulo
Furthermore, São Paulo is the largest city in Brazil, the largest city in the southern hemisphere and the
largest city in South-America. Moreover, it is the world’s ninth largest city by population.8 The city of
São Paulo has a population of 19.96 million people.9 It is ranked the second most populous metropolitan
area in the Americas and is among the six largest metropolitan areas in the world.10
São Paulo is the
capital of the state São Paulo and it is popularly referred to as Sampa. The following Table 1 includes
information regarding the population, area and population density of the state and city of São Paulo.
Table 1: Indicators regarding the population, area and population density of the state and city of São Paulo
8 Source: http://americanlivewire.com/top-10-largest-cities-in-the-world-2013/ (Accessed 29/12/2012)
9 Source: http://www.indexmundi.com/brazil/major_cities_population.html (Accessed 29/12/2012)
10 Source: http://www.blatantworld.com/feature/the_world/most_populous_metropolitan_areas.html (Accessed
29/12/2012) 11
Source: http://ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla=sp (Accessed 03/12/2012) 12
Source: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/link.php?uf=sp (Accessed 03/12/2012)
Indicators São Paulo state11
São Paulo city12
Population 2010 41.262.199 11.253.503
Area (km²) 248.222,801 1.521,101
Population density (inhab/km²) 166,25 7.387,69
Number of municipalities 645 -
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 31
Figure 1: Map of Latin America and the Caribbean13
13
United Nations, Department of Field Support Cartographic Section (May 2010), Source:
http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/eclac.pdf (Accessed 28/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 32
Additionally, Brazil is ranked 85 in the Human Development Index14
(HDI) according to the United
Nations Development Programme. Moreover, in relation to education, the mean years of schooling of
adults is 7.2 years. It is important to point out here that the inequality-adjusted HDI value is 0.519,
whereas the loss due to inequality in education is 25.7%. Moreover, the inequality-adjusted education
index is 0.492. The Figure 2 below shows how inequality affects the HDI achievement of Brazil.
Figure 2: The inequality-adjusted HDI of Brazil in 201115
Ribeirão Preto
Ribeirão Preto is a relatively small city in comparison to the city of São Paulo. Moreover, it is located to
the northwest of the city of São Paulo. Below you will find a map of São Paulo state showing the
location of both cities (figure 3). Moreover, Ribeirão Preto has a population of 604.682 (in 2010), an area
of 650,955 km² and a demographic density of 928,46 inhabitants/km².16
14
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2011) Brazil, Country Profile: International Human
Development Indicators: http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/BRA.html (Accessed 02/06/2012) 15
Source: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ihdi/ (Accessed 12/12/2012) 16
Source: http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/link.php?uf=sp (Accessed 28/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 33
Figure 3: Map of São Paulo state, showing the capital São Paulo city and Ribeirão Preto (underlined)17
4.2. Educational policy in Brazil
Now I will discuss the educational policy in Brazil. In the next sub-chapter I will discuss the Brazilian
educational system.
Firstly, in 1988 the Federal Constitution of Brazil was established, which states that the
(financial) responsibility for education is to be divided and shared among the three government levels,
namely, federal, state and municipal. I will discuss this in further detail in the next sub-chapter.
17
Source: http://www.v-brazil.com/tourism/sao-paulo/map-sao-paulo.html (Accessed 28/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 34
Additionally, “fixed amounts of tax revenue are earmarked for education and constitute the education
fund” (UNESCO 2006: 14). The new Brazilian Constitution stated that “all States, Municipalities and the
Federal Government had to spend a fixed share of their tax and transfer revenues in their public education
system” (Menezes-Filho & Pazello 2007: 661). Moreover, the Constitution mandated that 25% of state
and municipal income and 18% of federal government income are to be spent on education. (JBIC Sector
Study Series 2004; UNESCO 2006; Menezes-Filho & Pazello 2007)
Furthermore, in 1998, in Brazil, a reform was implemented in the funding of the public education
at the primary educational level. This educational reform was FUNDEF (Fundo para Manutenção e
Desenvolvimento do Ensino Fundamental e Valorização do Magistéerio), translated as the Fund for
Maintenance and Development of the Fundamental Education and Valorization of Teaching. Moreover,
the main aim of FUNDEF was to “redistribute resources from the richer to the poorer regions and to
increase public teachers’ wages.” (Menezes-Filho & Pazello 2007: 2) In this period both teacher salaries
and the enrollment rates in primary education increased.
Additionally, in 2006 FUNDEF expired and in 2007 FUNDEB was implemented. FUNDEB is
Fundo de Manutenção e Desenvolvimento da Educação Básica e de Valorização de Professionais de
Educação, translated as the Fund for the Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and
Enhancement of Educational Professionals. FUNDEB focuses on all basic education, from kindergarten
to secondary school. Moreover, the programme is intended to run until 2020. FUNDEB has as main
objective to promote the redistribution of resources related to education across the country. Moreover,
FUNDEB aims to redistribute the resources while taking the social and economic development of the
different regions into consideration. (MEC – Ministério da Educação)
Furthermore, Brazil offers conditional cash transfers (CCT) to students. In the 1990s local
conditional cash transfers were implemented and were experienced as successful. Afterwards, “the issue
gained momentum in Congress and several other bills were presented to introduce cash transfers
nationally, always linked to educational conditionalities” (Britto 2011). Under the rule of President
Cardoso in 1997, the federal government started to co-fund the local initiatives. “That arrangement was
reformulated in 2001 and led to Bolsa Escola, the biggest CCT among Bolsa Familia’s predecessors.”
(Britto 2011) Moreover, “by late 2003, Bolsa Escola had been implemented in almost all of Brazil’s 5,561
municipalities, providing nearly US$500 million in total stipends paid to over 8.6 million children from
5.06 million families.” (World Bank 2005: 1) In October of 2003 under the rule of President Lula da
Silva, Bolsa Escola merged with three other conditional cash transfer programmes to form the Bolsa
Familia. Bolsa Familia provides financial aid to poor Brazilian families under the condition that the
children of the families attend school and are vaccinated. The educational programme aims to reduce
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 35
short-term poverty by direct cash transfers and fight long-term poverty by increasing human capital
among the poor through conditional cash transfers.
In addition to the conditional cash transfer Bolsa Familia, there are several other educational
programmes which offer scholarships to students who go to university. Moreover, FIES is an educational
programme which offers loans to the students. I will discuss these other educational programmes in the
next sub-chapter. Now I will go into more detail regarding the Brazilian educational system.
4.3 Sistema educacional Brasileiro
I will briefly discuss the public educational system, as provided by the nation, state or municipality.
Moreover, I will discuss the educational structure at primary, secondary and higher educational levels.
Additionally, I will look at the public-private divide. I will discuss the access to universities, focusing on
the National Examination of Secondary Education and the vestibular or entrance exam. Finally, I will
discuss the FIES and ProUni as educational programmes which aim to increase the enrollment of poor
students in private higher educational institutions.
Public educational system
In Brazil, public education is provided by the nation, the state or the municipality. There are thus three
types of public education. In general, public education at primary and secondary educational levels as
provided by the municipality is considered of better quality than public education provided and
maintained by the state. Obviously, this differs per state and municipality as well. Moreover, in general,
public education at primary and secondary educational levels is of very poor quality.
At the higher educational level, Universidade de São Paulo, Unesp and Unicamp are examples of
universities provided by the state of São Paulo. Moreover, the federal university Unifesp is also located
in the state of São Paulo.
As stated in the Constitution, the states and municipalities are responsible for basic education.
Furthermore, “a historical feature of Brazilian basic education is its extremely decentralized nature, which
gives organizational autonomy to sub-national governments (27 states and 5,546 municipalities) in
organizing their educational systems” (JBIC Sector Study Series 2004: 7). The municipalities are
responsible for early childhood education (including kindergarten and pre-school education), while the
states and municipalities share responsibility for primary education. Secondary schools are the
responsibility of the states. Moreover, “maintenance of the system, including salaries, the definition of
teacher career structures and supervision of early childhood, primary and secondary levels (which make
up basic education) is decentralized, and these levels are responsible for defining their respective
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 36
curriculum content” (JBIC Sector Study Series 2004: 7). Below I have placed a figure showing the
Brazilian educational system and regulation.
Figure 4: The Brazilian educational system and regulation (JBIC Sector Study Series 2004: 8)
Educational structure
Children are expected to start primary school (ensino fundamental) at the age of seven. Moreover, this is
mandatory for all children. Primary school consists of eight years or series, which are divided into two
graus. The first four years of primary school are referred to as the first grau and the last four years of
primary school are referred to as the second grau. Sometimes, the first grau is also referred to as ensino
fundamental um (1) and the second grau as ensino fundamental dois (2).
After primary school, children go to secondary school, usually at the age of 15. Secondary school
mostly consists of three years, but is not mandatory.
Public vs. private universities
At the higher educational level, public universities, which are offered by the state or by the nation, are
considered the most prestigious and of the best quality. In addition to public universities, students can
attend private universities. Among the private universities, there is a distinction between the more
traditional private universities, which have higher tuition fees as well, and the low-cost private
universities. Examples of traditional private universities in the state of São Paulo are Pontificia
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 37
Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) and Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (Mackenzie).
The structure of the traditional private universities is similar to the structure of public universities.
Therefore, the quality of traditional private universities is comparable to the quality of public universities.
Moreover, Centro Universitário Sant’anna (Unisant’anna), Universidade Nove de Julho (Uninove),
Universidade Paulista (Unip) and Centro Universitário Anhanguera de São Paulo (Anhanguera) are
examples of low-cost private universities. In general, low-cost private universities offer poor quality
education.
Higher educational structure
In Brazil, an undergraduate programme would most likely be compared to the Brazilian bacharelado.
The bacharelado courses usually take about four years to complete. In addition to the bacharelado,
Brazilian universities offer licenciaturas, which usually only take up to three years to complete. The
licenciatura predominantly focuses on preparing the students to teach, with a strong emphasis on
pedagogy, whereas the bacharelado teaches the students the technical area of the course.
Furthermore, in reference to graduate programmes, Brazilian universities offer a pós-graduação
programme. The pós-graduação could be two things as well; it could be a specialization (especialização
or lato sensu) or a master’s programme (mestrado or strict lensu). The mestrado has a stronger academic
and scientific emphasis and focuses mainly on research. A mestrado could therefore be followed by a
PhD programme (doutorado).
Access to higher education
All higher educational institutions are obliged by law to have an entrance exam, which is called the
vestibular. The vestibular of most public universities consists of two phases, of which the second phase
is the most difficult. In general, students who are capable of passing this very difficult entrance exam
have attended good quality private schools. Conversely, the vestibular of low-cost private universities is
known to be relatively easy. The vestibular of low-cost private universities serves more as a protocol;
therefore, the low-cost private universities are more accessible for students who have not received good
quality private education.
The vestibular
As I have mentioned above, the vestibular is the entrance exam of a higher educational institution.
Moreover, in relation to the vestibular of a public university, the possibility of a student to pass the
vestibular is influenced by the specific group of students who are doing the entrance exam in that
moment. The vestibular has a nota de corte, which is translated as a cutoff score. In other words, the
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 38
student who scores the highest on one particular entrance exam sets the tone for the rest of the students
who are participating in this particular exam. There is thus not a fixed minimum score required to pass
the exam; the minimum score depends on the highest score and the amount of vacancies. There are for
instance twenty vacancies available for one higher educational course at a particular university. The
twenty students who score the highest will pass the entrance exam. Therefore, sometimes, it can be more
difficult to enter a certain university one year and less difficult the next year. Additionally, the possibility
of a student to pass the vestibular also depends on the popularity of a higher educational course and the
amount of vacancies it has. Moreover, the vestibular takes place only once a year.
ENEM exam
The ENEM exam is the Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio, or the National Examination of Secondary
Education. It is the national exam taken by each student in their last year of secondary school. Moreover,
it is obligatory. The score of the ENEM exam influences the score of the entrance exam of a higher
educational institution. In the case of the vestibular of a public university, the score of the ENEM exam
counts as 10% of the score of the vestibular. In the case of low-cost private universities, the score of the
ENEM exam, when high enough, can even exempt the student from the vestibular of the low-cost private
universities. Additionally, the score of the ENEM exam influences the possibility of the student to obtain
a scholarship of 100% or 50%, in the case of ProUni. Again, this depends heavily on the university, the
course and the amount of vacancies as well. Finally, how higher the student’s score of the ENEM exam,
the more chance he or she has in obtaining a scholarship covering 100% of the tuition fees. For example,
a certain score of the ENEM exam can provide a student with a scholarship of 100% for geography at
Unisant’anna, whereas the same score can only provide the student with a scholarship of 50% for
business administration at Unip. Therefore, the possibility of obtaining a scholarship also depends on the
popularity of the course.
The universities
The public university Universidade de São Paulo (USP) is the largest and most prestigious university in
Brazil and it is the number one university in the whole of South-America.18
Moreover, USP was founded
in 1934.
Additionally, two of the traditional private universities in the state of São Paulo are Pontificia
Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) and Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie (Mackenzie).
PUC-SP is a Catholic non-profit university and it has an ethos similar to that of the public universities
18
http://www.usnews.com/education/worlds-best-universities-rankings/best-universities-in-latin-america (Accessed
05/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 39
(McCowan 2007: 584). Moreover, PUC has a total enrollment of 30,000 to 34,999 and a total staff of
3,500 to 3,999. Additionally, the tuition fees are approximately 15,000 to 20,000 BRL per year, which is
equal to €5,553 to €7,404 or $7,324 to $9,765.19
Additionally, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
was founded in 1952. Mackenzie is a non-profit traditional private university of much prestige in Brazil
and has an educational structure similar to the public universities.
Furthermore, in addition to these traditional private universities, “a new group of profit-making
(or highly commercialized non-profit) institutions has emerged, with a very different orientation from
both public and traditional private institutions” (McCowan 2007: 584-5). These universities are primarily
teaching institutions, with little focus on research and a strong emphasis on “rapid expansion and cost
efficiency, employing aggressive marketing strategies in response to increasing competition” (McCowan
2007: 584-5). Universidade Paulista is one of the larger institutions and runs on a franchise basis.
Moreover, Universidade Paulista is very concerned with operating visibility strategies, positioning
campuses in prominent locations. (McCowan 2007: 584-5) Other low-cost private universities in São
Paulo are Uninove, Unisant’anna and Anhanguera.
FIES
Another attempt to allow students to attend private universities without paying the full tuition fees is
FIES, the Student Financing Programme or Programa de Financiamento Estudantil. FIES was initiated
in 1999 and provides students with a loan of 70% of the fees. This amount is paid directly to the
institution rather than to the student. Moreover, the interest charged is low by Brazilian standards and the
repayment begins in the first year after graduation. (McCowan 2007: 587) However, students from low-
to middle-income classes “may be unwilling to take on such large debt even at low rates of interest”
(McCowan 2007: 588). Additionally, the remaining 30% of the tuition fees to be paid by the student
himself can still be a too heavy burden.
ProUni
ProUni is the University for All Programme or the Programa Universidade para Todos. ProUni is a
rather new educational programme, implemented in 2004 under the rule of President Lula da Silva. “The
idea of ProUni is to encourage these universities [private institutions] to allocate their unfilled places free
of charge to low-income students, in return for exemption from tax payments.” (McCowan 2007: 589) In
reality, the unfilled places at private institutions are not allocated completely free of charge to low-income
students. This depends on the household income per capita of the student and partly on his or her score
on the ENEM examination as well. Students from families whose household income per capita is not
19
www.4icu.org/reviews/344.shtm (Accessed 16/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 40
more than three times the minimum wage can receive the ProUni scholarship which covers up to 50% of
the tuition fees. Students from families whose household income per capita is not more than 1.5 times the
minimum wage can be allocated a vacancy at a private institution free of charge, thus with a scholarship
covering 100% of the tuition fees. Moreover, “non-profit institutions have to dedicate 20% of their places
in this way in order to maintain their existing status of exemption from taxes. Profit-making institutions
have the option to allocate 10% of their places in order to obtain exemption from some taxes.” (McCowan
2007: 589) To sum up, initiatives such as ProUni and FIES do allow for a greater enrollment of students
in private institutions, but these initiatives do not contribute to an equitable expansion or will not ensure
equitable access to higher educational institutions.
Ministry of Education
The Brazilian Ministry of Education (MEC) evaluates and regulates the educational system of Brazil. For
undergraduate programmes, the quality is evaluated on the basis of the national exam, the ENADE. For
graduate programmes, the evaluation is facilitated by the CAPES Foundation, which grades the university
courses from one to five.
4.4. Accessibility to higher education
Now I will briefly discuss the accessibility to higher education in Brazil. I will discuss the findings of the
World Bank Policy Research Paper of 2008 on the Accessibility and Affordability of Tertiary Education
in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and Peru within a Global Context.
Firstly, the World Bank Paper shows the participation rates in tertiary education as percentage of
the four year age-group with the highest average participation rate. For Brazil, the four year age-group
with the highest average participation rate in higher education is 20-23 years old. Conversely, “the
limitation of this indicator is that the highest four year participation rate does not reflect the participation
of other age groups into tertiary education” (World Bank 2008: 22). For Brazil, the participation rate is
12.5%. In comparison, the participation rate as percentage of the four year age-group with the highest
average participation rate is 29.6% in the Netherlands and 20.3% in the United States. (World Bank 2008:
22)
Additionally, “the Education Equity Index (EEI) seeks to measure the socio-economic status
(SES) of students with access to tertiary education” (World Bank 2008: 24). The indicators used to
measure the EEI are the ratio of the percentage of university students whose fathers’ have a tertiary
education degree, which measures the SES of the student population, and the percentage of men aged 45-
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 41
64 who have a tertiary education degree, which measures the SES of the general population. Moreover, a
lower EEI indicates less equal access to tertiary education. Figure 5 shows the EEI.
Figure 5: Education Equity Index (World Bank 2008: 24)
Furthermore, the World Bank paper discusses the education attainment rate, which measures “a
percentage of population that attains a particular educational level” (World Bank 2008: 8). The ratio is
calculated between the people aged from 25 to 34 years who completed a tertiary education degree in
relation to the total population in the same age range. For Brazil, the education attainment is 8,5%,
compared to 25,0% in the Netherlands (World Bank 2008: 40). Figure 6 shows the education attainment
rates.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 42
Figure 6: Education Attainment Rates in percentages (World Bank 2008: 23)
Furthermore, the paper shows how the different indicators of accessibility provide different
insights as to which countries are “high access” countries. (World Bank 2008: 25) The Figure 7 shows the
overall accessibility, combining the different access indicators, namely the participation rates, gender
parity, the Education Equity Index and the educational attainment rate. This figure suggests that the
overall accessibility of tertiary education in Brazil is relatively low compared to high-income countries.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 43
Figure 7: Overall Accessibility (World Bank 2008: 26)
Addtionally, the paper states that the education costs as percentage of the GDP per capita is 48%
in Brazil, as compared to an average of 10% amongst the high-income countries. Moreover, the average
of the education costs as percentage of the GDP per capita amongst the Latin American and Caribbean
countries is 35%. (World Bank 2008: 36)
Furthermore, the public-private divide is of importance in relation to higher education. Schwartzman
(2004) discusses data which shows the increased enrollment in private higher educational institutions in
the last ten to twenty years. Figure 8 shows the growth of enrollment in higher education from 1990 to
2002.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 44
Figure 8: Growth of enrollment in higher education from 1990 to 2002 (Schwartzman 2004: 174)
As the Figure 8 shows, the enrollment in federal, state and municipal higher educational institutions
increased slightly throughout the years. Conversely, the enrollment in private higher educational
institutions increased significantly from 1998 to 2002.
Additionally, Schwartzman discusses the enrollment in private or public higher educational
institutions in relation to family income. The Figure 9 shows that as the family income increases the
enrollment in both private and public universities increases. This reflects how the Brazilian higher
educational system predominantly serves students from the affluent classes of society, acting as an elitist
entity. See the Figure 9 below.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 45
Figure 9: Enrollment in public and private higher educational institutions in relation to family income (Schwartzman
2004: 177)
4.5. Conclusion
To sum up, Brazil is one of the world’s largest countries in area and population and its economy belongs
to the seventh largest of the world. However, inequality is a pressing issue in Brazil and this is strongly
reflected in the unjust distribution of educational opportunities. Access to higher education, even more
good quality education, is a severe problem in Brazil. The higher educational system, public and private,
serve the students from the higher-income classes of society. Now I will discuss and analyze the data
collected in São Paulo and I will answer my research questions.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 46
5. THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS
In this chapter I will answer the first two sub-questions of my research. Firstly, I will discuss which real
educational opportunities students from low- to middle-income classes have. I will look at the possibility
of doing a pré-vestibular or a course to prepare for the vestibular. I will then discuss the only educational
opportunity these students have in reference to going to university, which is attending low-cost private
universities. Moreover, I will discuss the possibility of applying for a bolsa, which is a scholarship.
Then, I will discuss which social and economic factors influence the access of low- to middle-income
students to public higher educational institutions. I will look at various factors such as parental influence,
the household income and the previous schools the students attended.
Moreover, these factors are derived from a previous research from Ribeiro (2011) on the
inequality of opportunities and educational outcomes in Brazil. Ribeiro states several main factors which
influence the inequality of educational opportunities. Firstly, he mentions parental resources and
characteristics, which include occupational status and educational level of the parents (Ribeiro 2011: 78).
Moreover, in determining the inequality of educational opportunities, he includes the type of school
attended by the student before each educational transition, thus public or private (Ribeiro 2011: 43).
Lastly, he refers to the educational system itself and its institutional characteristics which promote
inequality in its own design (Ribeiro 2011: 44). Additionally, in her research, Torche (2010) discusses
the factor of family background, which include “family resources and conditions when growing up”
(Torche 2010: 85), as influencing educational attainment as well.
5.1. Real opportunities of students from low- to middle-income classes
The majority of the students from low- to middle-income classes are limited in their possibilities of
accessing a public higher educational institution. Now I will discuss the real educational opportunities
students from low- to middle-income classes have. Firstly, I will discuss the possibility of doing a pré-
vestibular or a cursinho, which is a preparatory course to prepare the students better for the entrance exam
of a public university. The pré-vestibular also serves to prepare the students better for the ENEM exam.
Then I will introduce the low-cost private universities as only opportunity for low- to middle-income
students to study at a university. Lastly, I will discuss the possibility of applying for a bolsa and the
different bolsas available for these students.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 47
5.1.1. Doing a pré-vestibular or cursinho
The education at public primary and secondary schools is of poor quality and does not prepare the
students well for the vestibular. Another possibility for students from low- to middle-income classes is to
do a pré-vestibular or cursinho. This is a preparatory course of usually one year, with classes five times a
week. These classes can be either during the day or at night, depending on where the student takes the
course. If students wish to take this preparatory course in their last year of secondary school for example,
the students often have the pré-vestibular classes in the afternoon, after school. Most students, however,
choose to do a pré-vestibular after secondary school. In this case, the students are already working and
therefore attend the pré-vestibular classes at night. In general, a pré-vestibular course is very expensive;
the costs of a one-year preparatory course are comparable to the yearly tuition fees of a low-cost private
university. I have come across two students who have done a pré-vestibular course which was offered by
USP, the public university of São Paulo, for free, but I believe that most students are not aware of this
opportunity.
The pré-vestibular or cursinho
Of the 22 students I spoke to, seven students were actually accepted to a public higher educational
institution, however were not able to enroll. I will discuss this in further detail in the next section. Of
these seven students, three students did a pré-vestibular. Three other students were more comfortable
with the quality of their previous schools and of what they had learned in school. Moreover, these
students studied at home in preparation for the vestibular. The last student, Evandro (30) explains why he
decided not to do a pré-vestibular course:
Yes, I thought about it, because as soon as you register for the tests of the vestibular, you are bombed with
propaganda of cursinhos and of people doing a cursinho. Or you meet people who are much better
prepared than you; you feel certain willingness. But you have to be able to finance it, to be able to pay for
the cursinho; a lot of times the price of a cursinho is the same as the tuition fees of a private superior
education.
In addition to these seven students who were accepted to a public university, another 11 students
attempted to enter a public university, however, without success. Of these 11 students, five students did a
pré-vestibular course. One of the students I spoke to, Cristiane (29) even did a preparatory course for two
years. Unfortunately, these two years were still not sufficient to pass the vestibular of a public university.
Cristiane explains that the two years of the pré-vestibular course were not even nearly comparable to the
years of good quality education and preparation students at private schools receive.
Many students explain that the costs of a preparatory course are too high. The costs are
approximately the same as one year of tuition fees at a low-cost private university. Additionally, doing a
pré-vestibular course is absolutely not a guarantee that the student will be accepted at a public university.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 48
Therefore, the majority of the students prefer to spend the money on their first year of university studies
at a low-cost private university than on a preparatory course. In this way, they have more certainty that
the money will not go to waste.
Furthermore, one student I spoke to, Jorge (37) explained to me that he simply did not want to
wait another year before starting his university studies, because he felt he was already too old at that
moment. By doing a preparatory course he would only be further delayed.
Conversely, doing a cursinho did help several students in preparing them for the ENEM exam.
For example, Solon (22) believes his high score on the ENEM exam is partly due to the preparatory
course he did. This score then enabled him to obtain his bolsa, which helps him during his university
studies at UNIP.
In conclusion, the majority of the students find the preparatory course too expensive when
compared to the yearly tuition fees of low-cost private universities. Other students prefer not to postpone
their university studies by doing a preparatory course of one year. For several students the pré-vestibular
course did help in reference to the ENEM exam. I will now discuss the vestibular and how the vast
majority of the students I spoke to tried to do the vestibular to enter a public university, but,
unfortunately, did not pass.
The vestibular
The vestibular of USP and most other public universities is known to be extremely difficult. The entrance
exam consists of two phases, of which the second phase is the most difficult. From the 22 students I
spoke to, 18 students did the vestibular and tried to get accepted at a public university, but 11 of these
students did not pass. These students mainly tried at the following universities: USP, UNESP, UNIFESP
or FATEC. One of the four students who did not try to enter a public university, Caio (24) explains that
he was not interested in entering a public university when he finished his secondary school. Additionally,
Jacqueline (30) tells me she was too afraid to do the vestibular. She says: “I believe it’s far outside of my
possibilities, far beyond what I could do… I think I am a bit scared for the vestibular; the vestibular is a
bit stigmatized.”
Of the seven students who were accepted to a public university, two of these students attended
private secondary schools. Daisy (51), who is currently studying at UNIP, already completed her
university studies at USP years before. Daisy attended private schools at primary and secondary
educational levels. Additionally, Guilherme (47) is currently studying at Uninove, but completed his
university studies at FATEC after he finished his private secondary school.
Furthermore, five students were accepted to public universities, but for different reasons were not
able to start their university studies. Joice (19) was accepted to a public university, but her mother did not
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 49
allow her to enroll. Joice’s mother preferred her to go to a university closer to home and to attend night
classes, so she could continue working. Additionally, Henrique (22) was accepted to a public university,
but was not able to enroll due to family reasons. Rodrigo (22) was accepted to two different public
universities, but the first university was in another state and, unfortunately, he could not afford to move to
this state. He was also unable to enroll at the second university for which he was accepted, due to a
mistake made in the registration.
In addition to this, two students were accepted to a public university and enrolled at this
university, but stopped after several years. Firstly, one of the students, Felipe (22) studied for
approximately 1.5 years at FATEC when he decided that he preferred to study something else. He then
switched to UNIP where he is currently studying. Secondly, Evandro was studying at the Instituto
Federal de São Paulo, but due to personal reasons he was not able to complete his thesis and was forced
to leave the university. Moreover, he explains why it took him three years to get accepted at this
university:
There’s a great difference between what you learn in the graduation of the first till the eighth serie today
and the three years of high school, and with what they ask from you in the tests of the vestibular. And I
didn’t have the ENEM in this time which gives you access to a federal university or the bolsa of ProUni; I
didn’t have this in my time.
Conversely, the vestibular of the low-cost private universities is considered very easy by the majority of
the students. The students tell me that it is more a protocol and that everyone passes. Additionally,
students who did the ENEM exam and scored well are exempted from the vestibular of a low-cost private
university.
In conclusion, the majority of the students tried to pass the vestibular to enroll at a public
university, but was not successful. This is mainly due to the difficulty of the entrance exam, but in some
cases, money, distance and personal reasons play a role as well. Lastly, the differences in age of the
students also explain some of the differences and the different strategies developed by the students. For
example, when the student is older of age and returns to school after years of working, it is more probable
that he or she will not spend another year in a preparatory course to prepare for the vestibular of a public
university. Moreover, it is often not very convenient for these students to study at the public university as
they work during the day and must attend classes at night. Now I will discuss which educational
opportunity these students have in reference to going to university, namely attending low-cost private
universities.
5.1.2. Introducing low-cost private universities
Due to the social and economic factors which I will discuss in the next sub-chapter, students from low- to
middle-income classes are limited in their possibility of accessing a public university. In reality, the only
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 50
educational opportunity these students have in reference to going to university is attending low-cost
private universities. In the last ten or twenty years there has been a rapid expansion of low-cost private
universities in Brazil, which greatly increased the enrollment rate of students in higher educational
institutions. Conversely, there is much discussion on the quality of these low-cost private universities. I
will discuss this in further detail in the next chapter. Now I will discuss who has access to which levels
and types of education. In the next sub sub-chapter I will discuss another opportunity most of the
students from low- to middle-income classes have, namely applying for a bolsa.
The Table 2 shows the percentages of people attending educational institutions, distributed by the
different levels and types of education. In this Table, the state and municipality of São Paulo is included
in the south-east region of Brazil. The Table clearly shows a vast majority attending public schools at
primary and secondary educational levels (ensino fundamental and ensino médio). At primary
educational levels this is a majority of 87.5% and at secondary educational levels this is 85.5%.
Conversely, at the higher educational levels (ensino superior) the percentage of people attending public
universities is reduced to a small 12.7%.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 51
Table 2: Percentages of people attending educational institutions, distributed by type and level of education (IBGE
2009)
Additionally, the Table 3 shows the enrollment of students at secondary and higher educational levels,
and in private and public schools, according to the quintiles of the monthly household income per capita.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 52
Table 3 clearly shows that the higher the monthly household income per capita is, the greater the
percentage is of students enrolled in private secondary schools. This is 2.7% in the first quintile of the
monthly household income per capita and no less than 55.7% in the fifth quintile. Conversely, in public
schools, the enrollment is less as the household income per capita is higher. The enrollment of students in
public schools at secondary educational levels is 23.3% in the first quintile of the monthly household per
capita and 8.0% in the fifth quintile. Moreover, at the higher educational level, more students are enrolled
at public universities as the monthly household income per capita is higher. Overall there are more
students enrolled in private universities, but the enrollment rates also increase according to the household
income. This clearly reflects that at the higher educational level, the educational system acts as an elitist
system, serving those with a higher household income.
Table 3: Students from public and private schools in secondary and superior education, distributed by quintiles of
monthly household income per capita (IBGE 2009)
Furthermore, among the private higher educational institutions it should be noted that there is a distinct
difference between the more traditional private universities and the low-cost private universities. The
students from low- to middle-income classes have the possibility of attending low-cost private
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 53
universities; this is their real educational opportunity. In some cases, this may also depend on the fact if
the student is able to obtain a bolsa. I will discuss this in further detail in the next sub sub-chapter.
Moreover, Solon comments on who actually has access to public universities:
So these people, who have more money and who have had a better basic education, go here [to a public
university]. Here, private schools are better than public; it’s very rare for students to get into a public
university who haven’t had good schooling since they were a child.
In conclusion, as students from low- to middle-income classes are limited in their possibility of accessing
a public university, these students are left with very few real educational opportunities. Evandro tells me
why he does not have many educational opportunities in reference to going to university: “Because the
vestibular is very difficult, with which I had many difficulties, and I didn’t have economic conditions to
pay [for a cursinho or a private university].”
Therefore, the real educational opportunities these students are left with are firstly, the possibility
of doing a pré-vestibular course to prepare the students better for the entrance exam of a public
university. Secondly and more importantly, these students are left with the real educational opportunity
of attending a low-cost private university. Thirdly, I will discuss the possibility for these students to
apply for a bolsa in the next sub sub-chapter.
5.1.3. Applying for a bolsa
Another educational opportunity which students from low- to middle-income classes have, is applying for
a bolsa at the moment of enrolling at a low-cost private university. Today, the most common bolsa in
Brazil is ProUni. ProUni, which was implemented by the Ministry of Education in 2007, offers
scholarships to students from public secondary schools who wish to enroll at private universities.
Participating universities are granted tax exemption. Not all students are qualified candidates to apply for
a bolsa. This depends heavily on the household income per capita of the student, as I will explain in the
next sub-chapter. The bolsas can differ from covering 50% of the tuition fees of the student to 100%,
depending on the household income per capita. This can help students from low- to middle-income
classes who wish to pursue a university studies at a low-cost private university to a great extent.
Conversely, the student must keep up good grades in order not to lose his or her bolsa. I will discuss this
in further detail in the next chapter.
In addition to ProUni, there are other bolsas as well for which the students can apply. There is
the possibility to apply for a scholarship from CNPq20
when the student is involved in any kind of
20
CNPq is the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development, linked to the Ministry of Science and
Technology.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 54
research during his studies. Conversely, usually, the student may only take part in a research group or
conduct research himself in the student’s second or third year of his university studies. Furthermore, a
few low-cost private universities have an agreement with the social movement Sem Terra. According to
this agreement, students from these universities may apply for a Sem Terra bolsa if they attend the
movement’s monthly meetings. At these meetings the students are expected to participate in the group
discussions.
Seven of the 22 students I spoke to do not have a bolsa, five of which did not qualify due to their
household income per capita. The other two students are currently doing their second university study, of
which their first university study was at a public university. Moreover, both students attended private
secondary schools. Therefore, these students are not eligible candidates to apply for a bolsa of ProUni.
Of the 15 students who do have a scholarship, eight students have a bolsa of ProUni. In addition
to bolsas with CNPq and Sem Terra, one student has a bolsa with a teacher’s union. Another student has
a bolsa with the educational programme Educa Mais Brazil21
and yet another student with the programme
Mais Estudos22
.
In conclusion, even when attending low-cost private universities is the only educational
opportunity for low- to middle-income students to go to university, many students are limited by the
possibility if they are able to obtain a bolsa. Only seven of the 22 students do not have a bolsa and of
these seven, five students told me that it would be difficult for them to continue studying if they would
lose their job for some reason. Additionally, the majority of the students who do have a bolsa told me
that it would be difficult for them to continue their studies as well if they would lose their bolsa. The
students from low- to middle-income classes are therefore extremely dependent on their job and of their
scholarship when studying at a low-cost private university.
To sum up, the real educational opportunities students from low- to middle-income classes have, is firstly
the opportunity of doing a pré-vestibular or preparatory course in order to prepare the students better for
the vestibular. Secondly, the students are left with the educational opportunity of attending low-cost
private universities. Lastly, in most cases, the students have the possibility of applying for a bolsa to help
them pay for their university study at the low-cost private university.
21
http://www.educamaisbrasil.com/ (Accessed 02/01/2013) 22
http://www.maisestudo.com.br/ (Accessed 02/01/2013)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 55
5.2. Influence of socio-economic factors on access
In this section I will discuss which social and economic factors influenced the access of low- to middle-
income students to public higher educational institutions in São Paulo, Brazil. I will discuss the
involvement and influence of the parents of the students in the students’ education. Then I will focus on
the household income and how this affected the educational opportunities of the students. Lastly, I will
look at the previous schools the students attended before enrolling at the university.
5.2.1. Parental influence
Educational level of the students’ parents
In this section I will discuss the educational level and the current occupation of the parents. Additionally,
I will look at the emotional and financial support of the parents for the students. I will focus on how these
factors may have affected the access of the students to a public university.
Firstly, by talking to the different students, who vary in age from 19 to 51, I was given the
impression that, in the time of the students’ parents, the importance of a university degree was not
strongly emphasized. Conversely, I understood that in Brazil today, society requires you to obtain a
university degree. This is also confirmed when speaking to several students whose parents are either
currently enrolled at a university or have recently completed their university studies. Felipe explains that
in Brazil today, however poor the education may be, the job market requires a lot from the people: “They
[companies] do not want anyone without a degree… So it is not a case of option, it is the case of
obligation; because, if you don’t do it, you don’t have any kind of future here in Brazil.”
Additionally, another student I spoke to, Guilherme (47), who teaches at public secondary schools
as well, argues that, twenty years ago, one could find a job at a bank without even completing secondary
school. Now the situation has changed, however, and the market asks more from you academically.
Even today, the students I interviewed do not agree that, having a university degree, will lead to a better
job and/or a better salary. Therefore, this could be the reason why some of the students’ parents do not
consider pursuing a university degree of extreme importance for the students, because it is not a guarantee
for finding a good job.
Furthermore, respondents have mentioned that, previously in Brazil, public education at primary
and secondary levels was of much better quality than it is today, perhaps even better than the current
private education (at primary and secondary educational levels). Therefore, I believe that the majority of
the students’ parents do not find it necessary to send the students to private primary and secondary
schools, as in the time of the students’ parents public schools were considered of better quality.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 56
Current occupation of the students’ parents
The current occupation of the students’ parents influences the household income per capita. Six of the
students’ mothers do not work, but attend after the house; three of the students’ mothers are deceased or
absent since the student was young; and one of the students’ mothers is retired. Three of the students’
fathers are deceased or have left the family and five of the students’ fathers are retired. The household
income determines the possibility of the student to attend private primary and secondary schools as well
as private higher educational institutions. Additionally, the household income per capita determines if the
student is a qualified candidate to apply for a bolsa23
. In the next sub sub-chapter, this will be discussed
in more detail.
The occupation of the students’ parents influences the educational opportunities of the students
and their possibility of entering a public university. With only one parent currently working in a
household, the student might be or feel obliged to work as well to contribute to the household’s expenses.
I will discuss this in the next section of this sub sub-chapter, ‘Financial support of the students’ parents’.
Emotional support of the students’ parents
The emotional support of the students’ parents greatly affects the students’ possibilities of accessing a
higher educational institution. It should be made clear that there is a difference in the emotional support
of the students’ parents depending on the age of the students ranging from 19 to 51. For example, one of
the students, Flavia (40), who is currently studying at Unisant’anna, went to school until her first year of
secondary school, only to complete her secondary school much later. She explains her situation in that
time:
No, my parents weren’t like that, if we went to school until the third year, this was OK. They didn’t see
their children in the faculty. Because we started working when we were very young, I started working when
I was 14, it was more for necessity and a dream we [Flavia’s sibling and her] had [to go to university].
Conversely, the students between the ages of 19 and 30 believe their parents motivated them to continue
studying and supported them in their choice of going to university.
Guilherme (47), the same student mentioned before who teaches at public secondary schools,
argues that the schools are not solely responsible for the poor education of its children, but that the
parents are partly to blame for this as well. Moreover, this is a common discourse among primary and
secondary school teachers in Brazil. Guilherme explains:
The children’s parents do not teach them [the children] that studying is important and that they should do
well at school. This is not something the teachers should teach them, but without this, it’s very difficult.
This happens a lot. I try to teach them [the children] that they need to study to find a job, but if they don’t
want this mentality, if they don’t absorb this, I won’t be the one to change this.
23
A bolsa is a scholarship.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 57
Guilherme compares where he teaches today to how things were twenty years ago and explains to me that
the parents of the children at school do not see the necessity of their children going to school or
university.
Additionally, a few students I spoke to argued that their parents do not necessarily disapprove of
them going to university, but would rather see them working and earning money. For example, Joice,
who studies at Unisant’anna, explains that her mother did not mind her going to university, but preferred
her to go to a university closer to home and to attend night classes so she could still work during the day.
However, this meant that Joice was not allowed to enroll at a public university for which she was
accepted, about three hours in public transport from home. For Joice’s mother, there was no difference
between a public university and the more accessible low-cost private universities.
Financial support of the students’ parents
All students, except for two, pay for their tuition fees of the university themselves. As such, the students
need to work in order to pay for their tuition fees, books, transportation and for other relevant school
material. In this way, the students’ parents do not support the students financially.
Conversely, 14 of the 22 students I spoke to are still living with their parents at the moment
versus in their own apartment or school housing. These students do feel that their parents support them
financially in this way. Caio explains his situation in relation to financial assistance from his parents:
“They already helped, but it depends, if I need help, they will help me; sometimes, if I don’t have the
conditions to pay for tuition fees, they will help me. But in the majority of the cases, I can pay myself,
because of my work.”
Additionally, some students assist their parents or family with various costs when they can, such
as the internet bill or groceries. For example, Joice works six hours a day to pay for her tuition fees, the
telephone and internet bill, and, with her vale refeição24
she buys food for at the house. The students’
parents never asked the students for money or financial assistance, but most of the students feel a certain
moral obligation to help their parents out financially, when they can. Jorge, who studies at Unisant’anna,
tells me: “She [Jorge’s mother] never asked me, but with my possibilities, if I can, I help out. Because all
my brothers and sisters are married and my mother lives alone, so when I can, I help.”
In response to my research question, parental influence is one of the factors which influence the access of
low- to middle-income students to public higher educational institutions. As I have discussed, the
educational level of the students’ parents can determine to which primary and secondary schools, private
24
A vale refeição is a meal allowance or a meal voucher.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 58
or public, the parents send their children. This is because, in the time of the students’ parents, public
education at primary and secondary levels was of better quality than private education. In addition, the
parents’ educational level can be a reason why the parents do not find pursuing a university degree of
extreme importance, because it is not a guarantee for finding a good job. The occupation of the students’
parents determines the household income, which might result in the student having to work as well.
Additionally, the household income influences which schools the students attended and their access to
traditional private universities. The household income per capita also influences the possibility of the
student to apply for a bolsa. I will discuss this in the next sub sub-chapter. The emotional support of the
students’ parents is important for the students’ motivation to go to university and continue studying.
Some parents do not see the necessity of going to university, whereas, fortunately, most parents today do
motivate the students to go to university and are involved in their education. Lastly, due to the financial
support of the students’ parents, all students, but two, work to pay for their tuition fees. However, 14 out
of the 22 students do live with their parents, which is a form of financial support in this way.
5.2.2. Household income
Another factor which greatly influences the access of low- to middle income students to public higher
educational institutions is the household income. Firstly, the household income limits the student in his
or her possibility of attending private primary and secondary schools. Secondly, the household income
limits the student in his or her possibility of entering an expensive (traditional) private university. In
addition to this, the household income per capita determines if the student is a qualified candidate to apply
for a bolsa. It also determines how much the bolsa will cover of the student’s tuition fees.
Access to private primary and secondary schools
In Brazil, private schools at primary and secondary educational levels are considered of much better
quality than public schools at primary and secondary educational levels. I will discuss the importance and
the influence of previous schools on the access to public universities in the next sub sub-chapter.
Therefore, the household income determines whether or not the student has the possibility to attend
private primary and secondary schools.
Five of the 22 students have attended both private and public schools at primary and secondary
educational levels. One of these five students, Caio explains to me that he attended a private school when
his parents were in a better financial position. Then, when his parents were in a more difficult situation,
he was sent to a public school. Caio says: “Then, in high school, I don’t remember why, but for sure
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 59
because of financial reasons, I went to a public school; I also have three other brothers and sisters from
more or less the same age who were going to school. So it was a bit complicated.”
Moreover, Joice went to a private secondary school, because she was able to obtain a bolsa here.
She obtained a bolsa atletica at her secondary school, because she was very good at sports and this
particular school invested a lot in sports to promote education. Therefore, Joice did not have to pay for
her tuition fees.
Conversely, a student from Uninove, Raisa (21) explained to me that she switched primary
schools from a private to a public school, because she felt judged at the previous school. She told me that
the children were prejudiced against people with less money: “They used to see in what kind of house you
were living, or the car your mother had.”
Access to traditional private higher educational institutions
The private universities of most prestige in São Paulo, Brazil, are the more traditional private universities
Pontificia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) and Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
(Mackenzie). In addition to the highest ranked university of Latin-America25
, the public university
Universidade de São Paulo, these universities are considered of very good quality in the state of São
Paulo.
The tuition fees of these universities differ greatly per course and year of studies. However, to
get a general impression of the yearly tuition fees of undergraduate programmes at PUC and Mackenzie,
see Table 4 beneath.
Yearly Tuition Fees BRL R$ USD $ €
PUC-SP26 15,000 – 20,865 7,500 – 10,000 5,500 – 7,600
Mackenzie27
12,000 – 18,000 5,861 – 8,791 4,504 – 6,756
Table 4: Yearly tuition fees of undergraduate programmes at traditional private universities in São Paulo, Brazil
Furthermore, today, the minimum salary in Brazil is R$62228
per month, which is an equivalent of
USD$298.11 and €226.56. This clearly shows the monetary threshold for students from low- to middle
income classes to attend traditional private universities.
25
Source: http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/latin-american-university-rankings/2012 (Accessed
16/12/2012) 26
Source: http://www.4icu.org/reviews/334.shtm (Accessed 16/11/2012), last updated 28/11/2012 27
Source: student from Mackenzie; http://www.mackenzie.com.br/mensalidades.html (Accessed 18/01/2013) 28
Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/BZMW:IND (Accessed 16/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 60
Access to bolsas
The household income per capita limits the student in his possibility of attending private primary and
secondary schools and traditional, private universities. Additionally, the household income per capita
may limit the student in his possibility of obtaining a bolsa.
When enrolling at a low-cost private university, the student has the possibility to apply for a
bolsa. In the case of ProUni, the household income per capita may be as high as 1.5 times the minimum
salary to be a qualified candidate for a bolsa covering 100% of the tuition fees. To apply for a bolsa of
50%, the household income per capita may be as high as three times the minimum salary. This may
determine if the student is able to attend a low-cost private university, because if the student does not
receive a bolsa of 100%, he or she must work as well, or work more, in order to pay for tuition fees and
other costs.
In conclusion, the household income is another important factor which influences the access of low- to
middle income students to public higher educational institutions. The household income influences the
access, because it limits the student in his possibility to attend private primary and secondary schools.
Private primary and secondary schools are considered of better quality and give a much better preparation
for the vestibular29
and a greater possibility of accessing a public university. Additionally, the household
income limits the student in his possibility to attend a traditional private university, such as PUC-SP and
Mackenzie, due to the high tuition fees. This leaves the student with as only real opportunity to attend a
low-cost private university. Lastly, the household income per capita determines if the student is a
qualified candidate to apply for a bolsa as well as the coverage percentage of the bolsa.
5.2.3. Previous schools
A third very important factor which influences the access of low- to middle-income students to public
universities is the previous schools the student attended. Private schools at primary and secondary
educational levels are of much better quality than public schools at primary and secondary educational
levels. Therefore, students who have attended private primary and secondary schools are generally better
prepared for the vestibular and have a greater possibility of accessing a public university. The Table 5
shows the student enrollment at the different educational levels and in public and private schools, in the
city of São Paulo.
29
The vestibular is the entrance exam of higher educational institutions.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 61
Table 5: Number of students enrolled in different levels of education, and in public and private schools (INEP 2012)
Table 5 shows a clear majority of the students enrolled in public schools; this is 73% for the first four
years of primary school, 80% for the last four years of primary school and 83% for secondary school.
Moreover, educação profissional is professional education or a technical course of usually two years,
which students do when they have completed their secondary school. EJA or educação de jovens e
adultos is an educational level at which both adults and youth can finish their primary and secondary
schooling, usually at a later age.
Most of the students I spoke to also attended public primary and secondary schools. 17 out of 22
students attended public primary schools and 13 students attended public secondary schools. As I
mentioned before, Joice had the opportunity of attending a private secondary school, because she obtained
a bolsa atletica. Officially, this is seen as attending a public school, because the bolsa covered 100% of
her tuition fees. The Tables 6 and 7 show the distribution of the respondents according to public and
private, and primary and secondary schools.
Public Private EJA Total
Primary school 17 5 - 22
Secondary school 13 5 4 22
Table 6: Distribution respondents by public and private, and primary and secondary education
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 62
Public Private EJA Total
Primary school 77,3 % 22,7 % - 100 %
Secondary school 59,1 % 22,7 % 18,2 % 100 %
Table 7: Distribution in percentages of respondents by public and private, and primary and secondary education
In summary, the majority of the students I spoke to attended public schools. This is a very important
factor which influences the access of these students to public universities. This is due to the poor quality
of the education at public schools, which therefore, does not prepare the students well for the entrance
exam of a public university. I will now discuss how the previous schools of the students affected their
possibility of accessing a public university.
In the last year of secondary school, the students do the ENEM exam. The ENEM exam is a final exam
which influences the entrance exam of a public and private higher educational institution as well as the
bolsa a student may obtain, in the case of ProUni. In addition to this, the student must do the vestibular,
which is the entrance exam of a university. With regard to public universities, the vestibular consists of
two phases, of which the second phase is more difficult. However, unfortunately, the public schools do
not prepare the students well for the ENEM or the vestibular. Five respondents argue that their previous
schools directly affected their possibility of accessing a public university. Evandro tells me about the
poor preparation he got from his school in reference to the ENEM:
No, it’s not fair, because you are doing an evaluation based on education which is not working. I have to
study outside; I have to do other courses outside of what is being offered, outside of what the state is
offering, to have conditions of doing well enough on the test in order to get a bolsa. It’s not fair, because I
could’ve had better marks, if the school would’ve prepared me better.
Furthermore, Evandro argues that his previous schools affected his possibility of going to a public
university:
[My previous schools affected my possibility of going to a public university] by not having learned a
greater knowledge, because of a lack of dedication from the part of the professors. There were problems
with students, confronting demonstrations/strikes, confronting unmotivated professors in the classroom.
The majority of them [the professors] had one student write something on the board and the rest would
have to copy, because in my time, education was about copying, so everyone would copy everything. It
wasn’t an education of discovering, of liberation, of empowering the students; I had an education which
was fragmented. It didn’t have much sense what I learned in school.
In addition to this, Solon, who studies at Unip, explains that he went to primary school during the time
that an educational programme was implemented, referred to as Progressão Continuada. The programme
was implemented under the rule of President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, who was the Brazilian
president from 1995 to 2002, before Lula da Silva. This educational programme would show for the
necessary statistical data with reference to literacy. The literacy data were necessary to maintain the
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 63
money given to Brazil by UNESCO to invest in its public educational system. However, it did not assure
that more children learned how to read and write, but it approved of all students, disregarding literacy, to
keep the necessary statistics. Solon argues that his education suffered from this, because many of his
classmates did not even know how to read or write. He says: “I think that, if I had gone to different
primary and secondary schools, I could have gotten into a public university.”
Conversely, two respondents argue that their previous schools were not the only factor which
limited them in their possibility of accessing a public university. In fact, these students admit it was
partly due to their own lack of dedication in secondary school. Furthermore, two other students argue that
their previous schools did not directly affect their possibility of access to a public university, but that it
still would have been necessary to do a pré-vestibular. A pré-vestibular or cursinho is a preparatory
course preparing the student for the vestibular, but also the ENEM.
Additionally, two students make a clear distinction between the preparation for the vestibular of a
public university and the preparation for the vestibular of a low-cost private university. They state that
their previous schools did not prepare them for the vestibular of a public university, but sufficiently for
the vestibular of a low-cost private university.
Quality of public education at primary and secondary levels
I will now discuss the quality of public education at primary and secondary educational levels. In
general, the Brazilian public education at primary and secondary levels is of bad quality. However, it is
important to note that within the public educational system there is a distinction between federal, state and
municipal schools, as I have previously discussed in chapter 4. Public schools which are run by the
municipality of São Paulo are usually of better quality than public schools run by the state.
Additionally, when applying to a public primary or secondary school, the month and year in
which the student was born, is important. For example, the quality of the public primary school Joice
attended was of good quality, according to Joice:
But it’s like this, it’s one of the regional schools for which a lot of people apply and I was lucky to get in. I
only got in, because I lived close and because I was born on the 8th
of January. In Brazil, the closer you are
to January, the more chances you have to obtain a vacancy, and I’m from the 8th
of January and I lived
close, so that was excellent. The education was great.
Joice explains that, as children have to be seven to enter a primary school, the children whose birthday is
before March have a preference. Thus, not all public schools are of bad quality, but unfortunately, the
majority is.
The students I spoke to describe the public primary and secondary schools they attended as very
basic, lacking infrastructure, facilities and dedication of the teachers. Moreover, Guilherme also teaches
at three different public secondary schools, provided and maintained by the state of São Paulo. I went
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 64
with Guilherme to the different schools to talk to the children, who are between 16 to 21 years old. When
asking the children about the quality of the schools, the children told me that they hardly have class.
They are supposed to have about eight classes per day, but in reality, they only have about three. This is
because teachers do not show up or are on strike.
In addition to this, Guilherme tells me that the majority of the pupils are sent to school by their
parents to keep them off the street. The children ask me if I know that the schools turns into a drug
trafficking point at night. Many children also come to school, because they get a free warm meal for
lunch. They act surprised as well when I tell them that I am enjoying São Paulo, because apparently I
have not been in the center of the city after dark.
I divided the class into five groups, of each about four pupils, and asked each group to write down
the five things which are the most important for them in their near future. Only one group wrote down
the word ‘studying’ as an important part of their future. Three other groups wrote down ‘knowledge’ and
‘wisdom’, but did not associate this with going to school. The most occurring words were ‘peace’,
‘family’ and ‘working’ or ‘profession’. Words that drew my attention were ‘determination’ or
‘perseverance’, ‘faith’, ‘having good social conditions’, ‘social equality’, ‘harmony’, ‘respect’ and
‘freedom’. This shows that the personal situation of the children and their socio-economic background
influences their thoughts about education. Moreover, being wise or having knowledge was not associated
with going to school or university. The real situation of poverty of these children impacts their
expectations in reference to their educational and professional opportunities; poverty does not allow them
to think in education or having a good job, when factors as ‘social equality’, ‘harmony’ and ‘freedom’ are
not yet achieved.
In conclusion, the pupils find their schools to be of very bad quality. Most pupils are not thinking
about going to university, but of working and having a family. Others are considering going to
university, but they do not know how they will get there. When I ask if the school is preparing the pupils
for the vestibular, Guilherme answers:
I teach at public high schools, so I can tell you, they don’t get any preparation for this [the vestibular of a
public university]. It is a complicated problem, because they are unprepared since the beginning, since
they are six or seven years old. I teach children of 16 and 17 years old and they hardly know how to read. I
would look for a text, but nobody wants to read, because they are either embarrassed or ashamed, or when
they read, they read without concordance, without respecting punctuation, etc. So I see no way out for
them.
The pupils use an interesting word to describe a person who knows how to read, but who does not
understand the meaning of what he or she is reading: analfabeto funcional. In addition to this, what drew
my attention as well was a young girl explaining how the situation was never going to change. She was
convinced the public education would never improve, because “they need people like us”. She explained
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 65
that the government does not want to improve the education, because the government needs people with a
poor education, who can be easily “controlled” by the government, to fill the simple jobs in the market.
Many pupils speak of a dream which they have to follow as well. I believe this dream is the
dream to escape from poverty. Many boys write of wanting to become a professional soccer player as
well.
Here are several quotes from the pupils of the public school Dulce Ferreira Boarin. I find these
important to note in reference to the public educational system of Brazil and the access of low- to middle-
income students to public universities:
Figure 10: Quotes of the pupils at the public secondary school Dulce Ferreira Boarin
In conclusion, I believe the quotes show very well the poor quality of a Brazilian public secondary school,
as provided by the state of São Paulo. In addition to this, the quotes and examples show the poor
preparation the students receive from the school in reference to going to university. It becomes clear that
the previous schools attended by the student significantly influence the possibility to access a public
Monica (21) says: “The only thing I can say is that this school doesn’t respect the cultures that come from
outside. I suffered a lot of prejudice because I am older, I have a different accent and I am more educated… In
my opinion, coming from this school, I do not have any capacity to do any faculty.”
Kaio says: “I think that with the level of education of my school, I will have to study three times more than a
student from a private school or than a student from a public school with a higher level of education than my
school. In my future, I would like to do a faculty of engineering, but I know that I lack 100 steps with the level of
learning of my school; I lack 500 steps for me to get to a faculty.”
Paulo: “I think that, not only me, but many people feel that they are being robbed, not of money, but of
knowledge, which the governors take from us every time they pretend that everything is fine with the education.”
Denise: “In the future I would like to do a faculty of veterinarian, but I think that I will not, for reasons of
money. And I think that I will not manage or succeed in doing a public university. They should give us conditions
to enter.”
Igor: “I do not want to do a faculty, because it is a waste of time and money. I would like to become an
international rapper. I think the school is a shit, it is six hours wasted of my life, but it’s better than selling
drugs.”
Ingrid (17): “The school I study at is of the worst infrastructure, not only of education, but it lacks professors.
The school is not to blame for this. For lack of the government which does not help us to improve the education.
I think it is because of a lack of respect to us as students, we are destroying our public heritage. We should come
together and fight to improve the education, not just for us, but for our children; we should charge the
government for our rights of having an education of quality.”
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 66
university. Moreover, Henrique comments on the poor public educational system: “In reality, public
education does not prepare the youth, the children, to have access to a public university.”
To sum up, there are three social-economic factors which predominantly influence the access of
low- to middle-income students to public higher educational institutions. Firstly, the parental influence
affects the possible access of the student to a public university, because the educational level and current
occupation of the students’ parents influence which schools the student attended. Secondly, the
household income also limits the student in his possibility to attend a private primary and secondary
school, as well as a traditional private university. The household income determines if the student is a
qualified candidate to apply for a bolsa. Lastly, the previous schools prevent the student from having
access to a public university, due to the poor quality of the education and the lack of preparation for the
ENEM and the vestibular.
In the next chapter I will go into more detail with regard to the educational experience of these
students at low-cost private universities. Additionally, I will discuss under which conditions this
experience takes place. Furthermore, I will discuss the quality of these low-cost private universities.
Lastly, I will talk about the expectations of low- to middle-income students in reference to their further
academic and professional opportunities.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 67
6. THE EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND EXPECTATIONS
In this chapter I will look at the educational experience of students from low- to middle-income classes at
low-cost private universities. I will discuss under which conditions this educational experience takes
place. Additionally, I will look at the quality of low-cost private universities and at the perceptions
students have of their educational experience. Lastly, I will discuss the expectations of the students in
reference to their further educational and professional opportunities.
6.1. Conditions under which the educational experience takes place
There are several conditions under which the educational experience of low- to middle-income students at
low-cost private universities takes place. Firstly, the majority of the students work besides their
university studies. Secondly, most students attend classes at night, after work. Thirdly, students who
have a bolsa must study hard to maintain a minimum 7.0 grade average in order not to lose the bolsa.
6.1.1. Maintaining a job
12 of the 22 students I spoke to work full-time. Three students are currently participating in a research
group or are doing an internship. Another three students work part-time, that is, six or four hours a day.
Finally, four students do not work, of which two students do not need to work, because their parents pay
for their tuition fees. A third student is not working at the moment, but is looking for a job. And the
fourth student worked a lot before enrolling at the university and saved money for his first year of his
university study. In this way, he has more time to focus on his study.
6.1.2. Attending classes at night
I will discuss another condition under which the educational experience of low- to middle-income
students at low-cost private universities takes place. As we have seen, the majority of the students work
during the days. Therefore, these students are compelled to taking classes at night.
Furthermore, there are four students who attend classes during the day. Among these four
students, two of these students do not work. Two other students have more flexible jobs, which enables
them to organize and manage their university studies and jobs in a manner which suits them best.
In conclusion, maintaining a (full-time) job and attending classes at night, leaves these students
little time for extracurricular activities or for family and friends. A few students have done or are
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 68
currently doing an English course and three students are involved in a research group or an internship, as I
have discussed above. This gives the students at low-cost private universities a disadvantage in
comparison to students attending public universities. The majority of the students attending public
universities are enrolled here, because they attended good quality private schools. It is also safe to say
that most of these students thus come from the higher-income classes of society. Therefore, the majority
of the students at public universities do not have to work and attend classes during the day. This also
leaves them with much more time to study in comparison to students at low-cost private universities.
Moreover, the quality of public universities is significantly better than the quality of low-cost private
universities. I will discuss this in further detail in the next sub-chapter.
6.1.3. Minimum grade average to maintain bolsa
In addition to maintaining a (full-time) job and attending classes at night, the students who have a bolsa
must maintain a certain minimum grade average to not lose their bolsa. Moreover, in most cases, this
means having a minimum 7.0 grade average.
Furthermore, the students who have a bolsa were also limited in their choice of university and
university study. For example, in the case of ProUni, the score of the ENEM exam determines your
chances of obtaining a bolsa at a certain university or with a certain study. For example, for a university
study which is very popular, such as business administration, it is more difficult to obtain a bolsa of
100%. Therefore, the chances of obtaining a bolsa vary per university and per university study.
In conclusion, the educational experience of students attending low-cost private universities takes place
under several conditions. Firstly, the vast majority of the students work (full-time) in addition to their
university studies. Secondly, these students are therefore required to take classes at night. Thirdly, the
students who have a bolsa must maintain a minimum 7.0 grade average in order for them not to lose the
bolsa. It is important to note that nearly all the students would not be able to continue their university
studies if, for some reason, they would either lose their job or their scholarship. To sum up, students from
low- to middle-income classes are limited by various social and economic factors in their possibility of
accessing a public higher educational institution. This leaves these students with as only real educational
opportunity to attend a low-cost private university, which is of poor quality. In the next sub-chapter I will
discuss the quality of the low-cost private universities. Moreover, besides attending low-cost private
universities, the students must work (full-time), attend classes at night and, in most cases, maintain a
minimum 7.0 grade average.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 69
6.2. Quality of low-cost private universities
I will now discuss the quality of low-cost private universities. Additionally, I will talk about the
perceptions of low- to middle-income students, who are attending these universities, in reference to the
quality and their educational experience. Each university is evaluated by the Ministry of Education. For
undergraduate programmes, the quality is evaluated on the basis of the big national exam, the ENADE.
For graduate programmes, the evaluation is done by the CAPES Foundation. Now I will discuss the
evaluation of the quality of the different universities.
6.2.1. Evaluation of the quality
The quality of low-cost private universities differs greatly per university and per university study. In
addition to this, Brazilian higher educational institutions are divided into three categories:
(1) Universities: institutions required to carry out research and community outreach as well as teaching, to
have at least 1/3 of their teaching staff with Master’s or Ph.D. qualifications, and at least 1/3 of their
teaching staff working full time. They have the highest level of autonomy.
(2) University centres: multi-course institutions not required to carry out research, but with autonomy to
open new courses without seeking the permission of the Ministry.
(3) Integrated faculties, faculties, and institutes or schools of higher education: smaller institutions, with
little autonomy, and which must have new courses approved one-by-one by the Ministry. (Neves 2002 in
McCowan 2007: 583-4)
Moreover, I spoke to students from the following low-cost private universities: Unisant’anna, Uninove
(Universidade Nove de Julho), UNIP (Universidade Paulista, in the municipality of São Paulo and
Ribeirão Preto) and Anhanguera (which now has become Universidade Bandeirante de São Paulo or
Uniban). Of these universities, Centro Universitário Sant’anna (Unisant’anna) and Centro Universitário
Anhanguera de São Paulo (Anhanguera) are university centres. The other higher educational institutions
are referred to as universities.
Furthermore, according to the Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio
Teixeira (INEP) of the Ministry of Education, the quality of higher education is measured by the General
Index of Assessed Courses of Institution (IGC). The IGC is an indicator, which considers the quality of
undergraduate and graduate programmes, the latter including mestrado and doutorado programmes. With
reference to undergraduate programmes, the CPC is used, which is the Preliminary Concept of Course. In
relation to graduate programmes, the CAPES ranking is used. The final result is in continuous values
(ranging from 0 to 500) and fixed values (ranging from 1 to 5).
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 70
Undergraduate programmes
Undergraduate programmes at higher educational institutions are evaluated on the basis of the big
national exam, the provão. The provão is a required test taken by the students attending a university and
is designed to measure the academic quality of the university.
The indicator measuring the quality of the undergraduate programmes at universities, the CPC
(Preliminary Concept of Course), is an average of the different measures of the quality of a course.
Firstly, the provão or the ENADE measures the performance of the students at undergraduate
programmes. The ENADE is the National Survey of Student Performance and part of the National
System of Higher Education Assessment (SINAES). It aims to assess the performance of students of
undergraduate courses in relation to programme content, skills and competencies. Additionally, the CPC
consists of the performance of freshmen in ENADE, the concept of IDD (the indicator of the Difference
between the Expected and Observed Performances) and the input variables. The data of the input
variables, which include the faculty, infrastructure and educational programme, is made with information
from the Higher Education Census questionnaire responses and the socio-economic ENADE. (INEP
Cálculo do Conceito Preliminar de Curso (CPC))
Moreover, the way of calculating the CPC has implications for the representativeness of the IGC,
being the General Index of Assessed Courses of Institution. For the CPC of a certain course to be
calculated, the course must have participated in the ENADE with freshmen and senior students.
Therefore, the IGC is representative of the courses which have participated in the assessments of the
ENADE with students who just entered the course and students who are about to graduate.
As each area of knowledge is assessed every three years by the ENADE, the IGC will always
represent a three-year period. Therefore, the IGC of 2007 will take into account the CPC of
undergraduate courses which participated in the ENADE in 2007, 2006 and 2005. As such, the IGC of
2008 will take into account the CPC of the courses which participated in the ENADE in 2008, 2007 and
2006, and so on. The measurement of the quality of the undergraduate programme which consists of the
IGC is equal to the average of the CPCs for the three-year period of interest.
Below I placed Table 8 of the results of the IGC per university, according to the INEP in 2011.
In this Table I included three universities from which I spoke to students for my research. Unfortunately,
Unisant’anna was not included in this Table. To compare, I included the traditional private universities
Mackenzie and PUC São Paulo. Additionally, I included two public universities: the state university
UNESP and the federal university UNIFESP of São Paulo.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 71
Table 8: IGC per university of 2011, according to the INEP
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 72
This Table includes the IGC of 2009, which takes into account the CPCs of the years 2007, 2008 and
2009. The IGC of the low-cost private universities which I included in my research (unfortunately,
Unisant’anna was not included in this Table) score lower than the traditional private university PUC-SP
and the public universities Unesp and Unifesp. Conversely, Mackenzie scores a three on the IGC results
as well. Uniban scores the lowest with a two. Moreover, if undergraduate courses score a two, the
university is required to improve this course, according to the Ministry of Education. If, however, the
course scores a two on the next evaluation as well, it must be closed.
Furthermore, in Table 10 below I have included an evaluation based on the ENADE of 2011. In
the Table I only focused on the low-cost private universities included in the research. Additionally, I
included the traditional private universities Mackenzie and PUC-SP. All universities are thus private.
Moreover, Unisant’anna and Anhanguera belong to the university centers, the rest of the higher
educational institutions are referred to as universities. Table 10 includes different areas per university,
which consist of several courses. Moreover, it includes the number of enrolled graduates and graduating
participants. The sixth column of Table 10 includes the score of the ENADE exam, ranging from one to
five. The last column includes the result of the CPC per area of university. I included Table 9 to give an
overview of the different universities included in the various Tables and the scores of the IGC, the
ENADE and the CPC. I calculated an average of the results of the ENADE exam and the CPC indicator
per university. Moreover, the IGC indicator includes the quality of undergraduate as well as graduate
programmes.
Universities IGC ENADE CPC
Unisant’anna - 2.54 2.6
UNIP-SP 3 4.06 4.31
UNIP-RP - 3.63 4
Uninove 3 2.5 3.38
Uniban 2 2.73 2.86
Anhanguera - 2.5 3
Mackenzie 3 3.4 3.72
PUC-SP 4 2.7 3.57
Unifesp 4 - -
Unesp 5 - -
Table 9: Overview of the universities with the score on IGC, ENADE and CPC
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 73
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 74
Table 10: Evaluation based on ENADE 2011
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 75
In conclusion, it is clear that, according to the IGC, the indicator measuring the quality of higher
education, considering undergraduate as well as graduate programmes, the public universities score the
highest. Unifesp, the federal university of São Paulo scores a five. Unifesp is followed by Unesp, the
state university of São Paulo, and PUC-SP, the traditional private university. In comparison, Mackenzie
does not score so well and scores equal to Uninove and UNIP-SP with a three. Uniban scores the lowest
with a two.
Furthermore, the scores of the ENADE exam vary greatly. UNIP São Paulo scores the highest
among the different universities, followed by UNIP in Ribeirão Preto and the traditional private university
Mackenzie. PUC-SP is next in line, followed by Uniban, Unisant’anna, Uninove and finally
Anhanguera.
Additionally, the CPC shows the quality of the undergraduate programmes of the university,
according to the different quality measures, including the score of the ENADE exam. Here UNIP São
Paulo and Ribeirão Preto score the highest, followed by Mackenzie and PUC. Uninove is next in line,
followed by Anhanguera and Uniban. Unisant’anna scores the lowest.
Graduate programmes
The universities are also evaluated by the CAPES Foundation. The CAPES Foundation is the
Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, linked to the Ministry of Education.
The CAPES evaluation ranks each university from one to five, which determines the type of financing a
given graduate programme receives from CAPES. The CAPES Foundation only evaluates graduate
programmes.
The CAPES evaluation includes the annual monitoring and a three-year assessment of the
performance of all programs and courses that are integrated in the National System of Graduate
Programmes. The results of this process, which are expressed by assigning a grade ranging from one to
five, determine which courses will obtain the renewal of recognition, by the Ministry of Education and the
CNE (The Higher Education Chamber of the Brazilian National Education Council), to prevail in the next
three years. The IGC, the measure of quality of graduate programmes, is a conversion of the rankings by
the CAPES evaluation. Table 11 shows the IGC score, as converted through the CAPES evaluation for
the graduate programmes of the following universities: UNIP-SP, Uninove, Uniban, Unisant’anna and
Unip-RP. Moreover, the rankings are from one to five, one being very poor, five being very good.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 76
Universities IGC CAPES Evaluation Year
Unip-SP 4 2011
Uninove 3 2011
Uniban 2 2011
Unisant’anna 3 2011
Unip-RP 4 2011
Anhanguera 3 2011
PUC-SP 4 2011
Mackenzie 3 2011
Unifesp 5 2011
Unesp 4 2011
Table 11: IGC scores of 2011 based on the CAPES evaluation for graduate programmes (emec.mec.gov.br)
It becomes clear that, in reference to graduate programmes, Unifesp scores the highest. Unifesp is then
followed by Unesp, PUC-SP and Unip in São Paulo and Ribeirão Preto. Mackenzie, Uninove,
Unisant’anna and Anhanguera score equally a three. Uniban scores the lowest with a two.
In conclusion, the public universities are of the best quality in comparison to other universities.
The public universities are then mostly followed by the traditional private university, PUC. Mackenzie
does not score as well as PUC and is comparable, in the evaluations, to the low-cost private university
UNIP. Conversely, UNIP scores very well in comparison to the other low-cost private universities. Most
low-cost private universities score, on average, a three out of five. Uniban and Unisant’anna score a two
which is the lowest score of these universities. Overall the quality of most low-cost private universities is
very low in comparison to the public universities or the (more expensive) traditional private universities.
6.2.2. Perceptions of the educational experience and quality
I will now briefly discuss the perceptions of the students from low- to middle-income classes, who are
attending low-cost private universities. Firstly, I will discuss their perceptions regarding the educational
experience. Then I will discuss their perceptions in reference to the quality of the low-cost private
universities.
The students I spoke to for this research differ in opinion in reference to the educational experience and
the quality of the low-cost private university the student is attending. All of the students like their
university studies and are convinced they will complete their studies. Moreover, the majority of the
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 77
students find the university they are attending to be of good quality. There are several aspects, however,
which could be improved.
Firstly, most of the students claim that their professors at the university are well prepared and
have as main goal to provide the students with good quality education. The students tell me that the
majority of their professors are graduated from USP or another public university. The students explain
that the professors organize fieldtrips outside of the university curriculum. The professors organize these
fieldtrips themselves and often pay for these as well. Additionally, one student tells me that the
professors even continue teaching when the university does not have the money to pay them. Moreover,
Evandro claims that the professors he has at Unisant’anna are better than the professors he had at the
public university he was attending previously. Additionally, the students attending the low-cost private
universities claim that the professors teaching at public universities are more preoccupied with their own
research and publications than actually providing the students with good quality education.
Conversely, the low-cost private universities lack a lot of investment in the infrastructure,
facilities and the materials of the universities. Furthermore, the universities are predominantly concerned
with having sufficient students; one student tells me they focus more on quantity than on quality. The
universities need a certain minimum amount of students in order to open a new course. Additionally, the
universities are for-profit universities and, therefore, seek to make the most profit. Moreover, the
universities invest a lot in commercials and the advertising of the universities.
Furthermore, in general, the classes of low-cost private universities are smaller than the classes at
public universities. Therefore, the students argue that they receive more attention of the professors. The
professors take their time to help the students and explain more thoroughly when necessary. Conversely,
several students argue that this slows the class down. Additionally, another student I spoke to, Tiago (24)
argues that the diversity of the class is very big. Due to the vestibular which is very easy at low-cost
private universities, all students get accepted regardless of their educational background. Therefore, the
educational background and the educational level of the students vary greatly in the class. This makes it
more difficult for the professors to teach the students.
In conclusion, the majority of the students like their university studies and believe the quality is
good. Conversely, there is much which could be improved. Additionally, as has become clear from the
data on the quality of the different universities, one can conclude that the quality of low-cost private
universities is significantly lower than the quality of public or even traditional private universities.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 78
6.3. Expectations regarding further educational and professional opportunities
Now I will discuss the expectations of the students attending low-cost private universities in reference to
their further educational and professional opportunities. Additionally, I will discuss whether or not the
students believe they have equal opportunities in comparison to students from a public university.
6.3.1. Further educational opportunities
In this section I will discuss whether the students are thinking of doing a pós-graduação, which could be
a master’s programme or a specialization, after completing their current university studies.
Of the 22 students I spoke to, the majority wants to continue his or her university study. Five
students told me they would like to continue studying, but were not sure yet what they would like to do.
One student was planning on doing an extra year to complement his licenciatura and complete his
bacharelado. Another four students were thinking of doing a especialização and five students explained
to me that they would even like to do a mestrado and a doutorado.
The other seven students either did not want to continue studying or were not sure whether they
wanted to continue studying or not. One student, Patricia (28) explained to me that she would like to do a
pós-graduação, but that she was not sure whether she would be able to pay for this. The other students
feel it is too much pressure to continue studying, in addition to their job and family; they prefer to wait a
while before thinking of continuing their university studies.
To sum up, the majority of the students is thinking of continuing their university studies.
Conversely, seven students do not wish to continue their studies or are not sure about this.
6.3.2. Further professional opportunities
In this section I will discuss what the students think to gain from studying at a university. Additionally, I
will look at where the students see themselves working after having completed their university studies.
Then I will look at whether the students think that obtaining a university degree will result in having a
better job or a higher salary. Lastly, I will talk about whether the students feel they are being sufficiently
prepared to insert in the job market.
Firstly, six of the 22 students I spoke to believe that studying at a university will provide the
student with knowledge. Other important motivators for the students to study at a university are
improving their professional possibilities as well as being able to do what he or she likes. Moreover,
Evandro explained that studying at a university would mean for him to be better recognized as a citizen
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 79
and to have a better social position. Additionally, Jacqueline expected or hoped to gain ‘felicidade
financeiro’ by studying at a university. Translated this means something similar to ‘financial happiness’,
which is doing what you like and also earning good money by doing it, she explained to me.
Furthermore, I will discuss where the students see themselves working after graduation. Half of
the students I spoke to would like to work in the area of education. Preferably, these students would like
to teach. To become a teacher in Brazil, the students must do the concurso público, which is a public
examination one must do to become a teacher or to work in any other public area. Additionally, several
students see themselves working in research, or having their own business or office (in the areas of
psychology and medicine). Some students see themselves working in programming, environment
analysis, tourist geography and most importantly, an area of interest. Most students also believe they will
accomplish these professional expectations. Conversely, one student told me that she would like to have
her own practice, but that she did not think she would be able to, because of monetary reasons.
Additionally, 16 of the 22 students believed that obtaining a university degree would result in
having a better job. Conversely, three students argued that having a university degree is not a definite
guarantee in achieving a better job. Three other students believed that the knowledge and experience they
obtained during their university studies are more important than the actual diploma. Furthermore, they
believed that this knowledge and experience would help them in getting a better job. Moreover, a better
job was defined by most students as working in an area of personal interest rather than a well respected
job or a job with which the student could earn a lot of money.
Moreover, 16 of the 22 students also believed that having a university degree would result in a
higher salary. One student, Rafaela (22) argued that it is not a rule that having a university degree will
result in a higher salary, but without it, this would be even more difficult. Additionally, Patricia argued
that a university degree is not so much valued in Brazil today.
Lastly, I will discuss whether the students feel they are being sufficiently prepared to confront the
job market. 12 of the 22 students believe their current university study is preparing them well for the job
they wish to pursue. Two students, who are currently doing their licenciatura, believe their university
study is preparing them well to become a teacher. Another five students believe that the university is
preparing them for the job market to a certain extent, but that it will require full dedication from the
student to get where he or she wants. Lastly, three students believe their university study is not preparing
them at all for the job market and is solely providing them with the basis of what is necessary.
In conclusion, the students from low- to middle-income classes at low-cost private universities
believe they will gain knowledge by studying at a university. Additionally, studying at a university will
provide the student with better professional possibilities and it will enable the student to work in an area
which he or she likes. Furthermore, the majority of the students see themselves working in the area of
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 80
education. Moreover, nearly all students believe they will reach their goals in reference to their career.
The majority of the students also believe that having a university degree will result in a better job and a
higher salary. Lastly, about half of the students feel their university study is preparing them well to
confront the job market. Conversely, the other half believes their studies is not preparing them at all or is
preparing them to a certain extent, but that it will require much devotion and dedication of the student
himself to get where he wants professionally.
6.3.3. Inequalities
In this last sub sub-chapter I will discuss the concept of inequality. Moreover, I will discuss the
perceptions of the students at low-cost private universities regarding inequality of educational
opportunity. I will talk about whether the students feel competition from students at public universities.
Additionally, I will discuss the perceptions of the students in reference to equal opportunities of career
possibilities.
I asked the students at low-cost private universities about their opportunities in reference to career
possibilities. Nine of the 22 students feel they do not have equal opportunities in comparison to a student
from a public university. These students claim that the students at public universities or at USP have an
advantage due to the name of the university and its status. Moreover, these students are aware of the fact
that USP and other public universities are of much better quality than the low-cost private universities
they are attending. Another six students feel that they do have equal opportunities in reference to career
possibilities, because of the experience they obtained during their university studies. They feel this
experience is significantly important when applying for a job position. Lastly, seven students believe that
the students from USP or another public university have a different mentality. First of all, these students
have already passed a more difficult vestibular and secondly, they have more time to study. This gives
the students from a public university a certain advantage, but these seven students believe that if they try
hard enough, they could get there.
To sum up, Henrique gives a good explanation of the differences between the students at low-cost
private universities and the students at public universities:
The students from USP, I don’t say that all students are like this, I do not want to generalize, but the
majority of the students there are precisely the students from the elite, who have studied in extremely
expensive schools. Simple people, who have access to public education, end up having much more
difficulties, because they need to work, etc. The conditions are very unequal in comparison to a student
who went to the best schools, who had better conditions, who doesn’t need to work and who can stay home
to study. This is not fair. I think that many governments have the interest that, the more students have
difficulties going to a good university, the better, because then there are more people with a less
institutional level, who are easier to dominate, who accept…
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 81
In conclusion, the students at low-cost private universities do not have the same opportunities, educational
and professional, in comparison to students at public universities. All the same, not all the students at
low-cost private universities are aware of this or choose not to acknowledge this. When discussing the
advantage students have at public universities in comparison to students at low-cost private universities,
Daisy says: “You cannot give too much importance to this; otherwise you’ll just give up. The people have
hope that everything will be all right.”
In conclusion, the educational experience of low- to middle-income students at low-cost private
universities takes place under three conditions. Firstly, the students must maintain a (full-time) job to pay
for their university studies. Secondly, this causes the students to attend classes at night. Thirdly, the
majority of the students must maintain a certain minimum 7.0 grade average in order not to lose their
bolsa. Additionally, the quality of low-cost private universities is significantly lower than the quality of
public universities and traditional private universities. Lastly, the majority of the students at low-cost
private universities expect to continue their university studies. Furthermore, the students are convinced
that they will accomplish their professional expectations. Conversely, the students at low-cost private
universities do not share the same opportunities, educational and professional, as students from public or
traditional private universities.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 82
7. Conclusion
Today, Brazil is the fifth largest country in the world, both by area and by population, and its economy is
the 7th largest in the world by GDP. Moreover, São Paulo is the largest city in South-America and in the
southern hemisphere. However, unfortunately, in Brazil, structural inequalities are deeply present in the
country’s social-, political and economic system. This is no different in the Brazilian educational system,
which acts as an elitist entity, serving the wealthy and those from the affluent classes of society.
Moreover, access to good quality education is a severe problem, especially for pupils and students from
low- to middle-income classes. The purpose of this research was to explore the educational opportunities
of students from low- to middle-income classes in relation to higher education. Therefore, my central
research question is as follows:
What are the educational opportunities of students from low- to middle-income classes in relation
to higher education in the state of São Paulo, Brazil?
In the theoretical framework I explained how the privatization of higher education is derived from
neoliberal policies in the context of the current globalization agenda, leading to processes of privatization.
I questioned the assumed positive effects of the privatization of education on educational expansion and
quality and discussed its effects on educational policy. Lastly, I showed how the privatization of
education and the expansion of private schools influence educational opportunities and reproduce
inequalities.
Moreover, in this research I aimed to explore which real educational opportunities students from
low- to middle-income classes are left with in relation to higher education. Additionally, I looked at
which socio-economic factors influence the access of low- to middle-income students to public higher
educational institutions. Furthermore, I discussed the educational experience of students attending low-
cost private universities and the conditions under which this educational experience takes place. I also
discussed the quality of the low-cost private universities and the perceptions of the students regarding the
quality and the educational experience. Finally, I looked at the expectations of the students attending
low-cost private universities in relation to their further educational and professional opportunities.
Lastly, to answer these questions I interviewed students from the following different low-cost
private universities: Centro Universitário Sant’anna (Unisant’anna), Universidade Nove de Julho
(Uninove), Universidade Paulista (Unip) in São Paulo and Ribeirão Preto and, finally, Centro
Universitário Anhanguera de São Paulo (Anhanguera). Moreover, I visited three public secondary
schools, governed by the state of São Paulo, where I engaged the children in participatory activities in
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 83
relation to (higher) education. The schools I visited are E.E. Dulce Ferreira Boarin, E.E. Augusto
Meirelles Reis Filho and E.E. Casimiro de Abreu.
In this chapter I will highlight the main findings of this research and through these findings I will
answer the main research question. Additionally, I will reflect on the research methodology. Finally, I
will discuss suggestions for further study in relation to the privatization and educational opportunities of
low-income students in Brazil.
7.1. Findings of the research
Now I will highlight the main findings of this research. In summary, as public education at primary and
secondary educational levels does not prepare the student sufficiently to enter a public university, the
students from low- to middle-income classes are left with the opportunity of doing a pré-vestibular to
prepare the student better for the entrance exam. In most cases, the preparatory course is still not
sufficient for the student to access a public university. Therefore, the real educational opportunity these
students have, is attending a low-cost private university. Finally, the student usually has the possibility of
applying for a bolsa to help pay for the tuition fees.
Additionally, there are three predominant factors which emerged from this research and influence
the access of students from low- to middle-income classes to public higher educational institutions.
Firstly, the parental influence, including the educational level and current occupation of the students’
parents, affects the possible access of the student to a public university. Secondly, the household income
limits the student in his possibility to attend private primary and secondary schools and traditional private
universities. Moreover, the household income changes the conditions under which the educational
experience takes place, as the students have to work besides their studies. Thirdly, the previous schools
attended by the student prevent the student from having access to public universities, due to the poor
quality of the education and the lack of preparation for the ENEM and the vestibular.
Furthermore, the educational experience of the students attending low-cost private universities
takes place under several conditions. Firstly, the majority of the students work (full-time) in addition to
their university studies. Therefore, the students attend classes at night. Moreover, the students who
managed to obtain a bolsa must maintain a minimum 7.0 grade average in order not to lose their bolsa.
In this way, students from low- to middle-income classes are very limited in their educational
opportunities. Moreover, they usually receive education of very poor quality at the low-cost private
universities. The public universities are considered of the best quality and very prestigious, followed by
the traditional private universities.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 84
Finally, the students attending low-cost private universities believe they will gain knowledge by
studying at a university. Moreover, studying at a university will provide the student with better
professional opportunities and most likely a better job and a higher salary. Half of the students feel the
university is preparing them well to confront the job market, whereas the other half feels it will require
much extra devotion and dedication on the student’s part to reach his or her professional goals. Lastly,
the students at low-cost private universities do not share the same opportunities, educational and
professional, in comparison to students at public universities.
In conclusion, students from low- to middle-income classes are very limited in their educational
opportunities in relation to higher education in the case of São Paulo, Brazil. The student’s household
income and the previous schools attended by the student prevent the student from having a good
educational background. Therefore, these factors prevent the student from passing the vestibular,
attending a public university and thus from having access to good quality higher education. Furthermore,
these students are left with as only educational opportunity in relation to higher education to attend a low-
cost private university. Moreover, these students do not consider their educational experience as easy, as
the students work full-time, attend classes at night and must maintain a minimum grade average in order
not to lose their bolsa. Therefore, the Brazilian educational system serves the affluent classes of society,
at primary, secondary and higher educational levels. Students from low-income classes receive poor
education since they are young, starting with primary and secondary school. Due to their poor
educational background and the monetary threshold to good quality education, only very few students
actually have the educational opportunity of attending university.
Moreover, the few students from low-income classes who do have the educational opportunity of
attending university only have the educational opportunity of attending low-cost private universities.
Even more so, the quality of these low-cost private universities is very poor in comparison to the public or
traditional private universities. Therefore, the students attending low-cost private universities do not
share the same educational and professional opportunities as students from public or traditional private
universities, yet again reproducing inequalities.
Conversely, several educational programmes, such as ProUni, have been implemented with as
aim to democratize the educational system and provide more educational opportunities for students from
low- to middle-income classes. These educational programmes have resulted in a greater enrollment of
poor students at the low-cost private universities, but this expansion has not been equitable and little
attention has been paid to the quality.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 85
7.2. Reflection on the methodology
Now I will reflect on the methodology. This research was conducted using a mixed-methods approach,
combining qualitative in-depth semi-structured interviews and various participatory research methods.
This allowed me to explore the experience, perceptions and expectations of the students attending low-
cost private universities in reference to their educational opportunities. Moreover, attending the different
public schools enabled me to better understand the quality of public education at primary and secondary
educational levels, which is very poor, and the actual educational opportunities these pupils have in
reference to attending university.
Furthermore, as I discussed previously as well, initially, I did not speak the local language.
Therefore, the interviews had to be translated for me, with the risk of losing information in translation.
Later on, my translator was not able to accompany me to the interviews and therefore, I conducted the
interviews myself. This was quite a challenge. Additionally, the participatory research activities were not
as applicable as I expected beforehand, because the pupils were older than I expected and the class was
rather chaotic. Conversely, after visiting the different schools, I was able to return to the first school and
successfully do the activity.
With this approach I was able to get a better understanding regarding the educational experience,
perceptions and expectations of the students. The interviews were meant to act as life stories, reflecting
the students’ history and educational trajectory. I believe I was able to understand better the students’
experience, perceptions and expectations in reference to their educational opportunities by using this
approach and engaging in one-on-one in-depth interviews. Conversely, by not including a quantitative
approach in this research, I missed out on statistical primary data. A quantitative analysis could have
been convenient in researching the socio-economic background of the students and collecting data on the
quality and evaluation of the different educational institutions, the enrollment rates and the public-private
divide. Moreover, I believe I was able to include the most important statistics by making use of
secondary data regarding these topics.
7.3. Suggestions for further study
In line with the conclusions of this research, I would like to make several suggestions for further research.
In Brazil, the problem of access to good quality education starts with primary and secondary education.
Here students from low-income classes cannot afford to attend private schools. Therefore, low-income
students do not have the educational background to gain access to a public university. Conversely, due to
the privatization of higher education in Brazil, a rapid expansion occurred of low-cost private universities.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 86
With the increase of educational programmes, which help low-income students pay for these universities,
the enrollment in higher education increased significantly. However, little attention has been paid to an
equitable expansion and to the quality of these low-cost private universities. In relation to the
privatization of education, I would like to do further research on the different educational programmes
which aim to include the marginalized and the low-income students in Brazil, such as ProUni. I would
like to research how educational programmes could contribute to a more equitable expansion of higher
educational institutions.
Additionally, I would like to research the educational opportunities of low-income students in
relation to attending private primary and secondary schools. Moreover, it would be interesting to research
the professional opportunities of students who have completed their university studies at a low-cost
private university, exploring the relation between inequality of educational opportunity and unequal
educational outcomes. Lastly, it would be interesting to do a comparative study, researching the
educational opportunities of students at low-cost private universities and students at public or traditional
private universities. Here I would like to look at the quality of the different universities and explore the
inequalities of educational opportunity.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 87
Bibliography
Andriesse, E., Beerepoot, N., van Helvoirt, B. & A.C.M. van Westen (eds) (2011) ‘Business Systems,
Value Chains and Inclusive Regional Development in South-East Asia’, In Helmsing, A.H.J. & S.
Vellema (eds) Value Chains, Inclusion and Endogenous Development Contrasting Theories and Realities,
pp. 151-177, New York: Routledge
Ball, S. & A. Cribb (2005) ‘Towards An Ethical Audit of the Privatisation of Education’ British Journal
of Educational Studies 53(2): 115-128
Ball, S. & D. Youdell (2008) ‘Hidden Privatisation in Public Education’ Education International,
Brussels
Ball, S. J., Thrupp, M. & M. Forsey (2010) ‘Hidden markets: the new education privatization’ British
Journal of Sociology of Education 31(2): 229-241
Bonal, X. (2004) ‘Is the World Bank education policy adequate for fighting poverty? Some evidence from
Latin America’ International Journal of Educational Development 24: 649-666
Bonal, X. (2007) ‘On global absences: reflections on the failings of the education and poverty
relationship’ International Journal of Educational Development 27(1): 86-100
Britto, T. (2011) ‘Conditional Cash Transfers and the Basic Income Grant in Brazil: Will They Ever
Merge?’ The International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth 124, Available online at: http://www.ipc-
undp.org/pub/IPCOnePager124.pdf (Accessed 28/12/2012)
Brazilian Government (2012) ‘Brazilian Middle Class Reaches 52% of Total Population’ Press Releases,
Available online at: http://www.brasil.gov.br/para/press/press-releases/november-1/brazilian-middle-
class-reaches-52-of-total-population/br_model1?set_language=en (Accessed 31/12/2012)
Carnoy, M. (1995) ‘Is school privatization the answer?’ Education Week 14(40): 52, Academic Search
Premier
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 88
CEBRAP (May 2012) ‘The real Brazil: The inequality behind the statistics’ Christian Aid: 1-88,
Available online at: http://www.christianaid.org.uk/images/real-brazil-full-report.pdf (Accessed
12/01/2013)
Consortium of: Paulo Renato Souza Consultores, Tendências Consultoria Integrada and Núcleo de
Estudos de Políticas Públicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (2005) ‘Sector Study for Education
in Brazil’ JBIC Sector Study Series 2004 (2), Available online at:
http://www.jica.go.jp/activities/schemes/finance_co/approach/pdf/brazil.pdf (Accessed 15/01/2013)
Crotty, M. (1998) The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research
Process
Dale, R. (1999) ‘Specifying Globalisation Effects on National Policy: focus on the Mechanisms’ Journal
of Education Policy 14(1): 1 -17
Embassy of Brazil in London Population Available online at:
http://www.brazil.org.uk/brazilinbrief/population.html (Accessed 31/12/2012)
Google Public Data Explorer – World Development Indicators and Global Development Finance,
Available online at:
https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_pop_totl&idim=country:BR
A&dl=en&hl=en&q=population%20brazil (Accessed 29/12/2012)
Hackshaw, J. (2008) ‘Disaster Capitalism in Brazil’s Education System: The Commodification of
Education’ The Politics eZine – Privatization, Available online at: http://politics.lilithezine.com/Disaster-
Capitalism-Brazil.html (Accessed 13/01/2013)
Härmä, J. (2009) ‘Can choice promote Education for All? Evidence from growth in private primary
schooling in India’ Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 39(2): 151 – 165
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas Cidades Available online at:
http://www.ibge.gov.br/cidadesat/link.php?uf=sp (Accessed 03/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 89
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas Estado Available online at:
http://ibge.gov.br/estadosat/perfil.php?sigla=sp (Accessed 03/12/2012)
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas (2009) Summary of Social Indicators, An analysis
of the Brazilian population life conditions 2009 Available online at:
http://www.ibge.gov.br/english/estatistica/populacao/condicaodevida/indicadoresminimos/sinteseindicsoc
iais2009/default_tab.shtm (Accessed 03/12/2012)
IHEP – Institute for Higher Education Policy (March 2009) Privatization in Higher Education: Cross-
Country Analysis of Trends, Policies, Problems and Solutions, Available online at:
http://www.ihep.org/assets/files/publications/m-r/(Issue_Brief)_Privatization_in_Higher_Education-
Cross_Country_Analysis_of_Trends__Policies__Problems__and_Solutions.pdf (Accessed 13/01/2013)
IMF – International Monetary Fund (2011) ‘More or Less’ Finance & Development 48 (3), Available
online at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2011/09/milanovic.htm (Accessed 12/01/2013)
INEP – Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais ‘Anísio Teixeira’, Ministério da
Educação Cálculo do Conceito Preliminar de Curso (CPC) Available online at:
http://www.colgrad.fis.ufba.br/enade/cpc_final.pdf (Accessed 02/01/2013)
INEP – Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais ‘Anísio Teixeira’, Ministério da
Educação (2012) Sistema de Consulta a Matrícula do Censo Escolar – 1997/2012 Available online at:
http://portal.inep.gov.br/basica-censo-escolar-matricula (Accessed 03/12/2012)
INEP – Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais ‘Anísio Teixeira’, Ministério da
Educação Indicador de qualidade das instituições de educação superior (2011) Available online at:
http://portal.inep.gov.br/indice-geral-de-cursos (Accessed 19/12/2012)
McCowan, T. (2004) ‘The growth of private higher education in Brazil: implications for equity and
quality’ Journal of Education Policy 19(4): 454-472
McCowan, T. (2007) ‘Expansion without equity: An analysis of current policy on access to higher
education in Brazil’ Higher Education 53: 579-598, Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 90
MEC – Ministério da Educação Fundeb Available online at:
http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12407&Itemid=725
(Accessed 28/12/2012)
MEC – Ministério da Educação Instituições de Educação Superior e Cursos Cadastrados Available
online at: emec.mec.gov.br (Accessed 18/12/2012)
Menezes-Filho, N. & E. Pazello ‘Evaluating the Effects of FUNDEF on Wages and Test Scores in Brazil’
University of São Paulo
Pinto, J.M. (2004) ‘Access to higher education in Brazil’ Educação & Sociedade 25(88): 727-756,
Available online at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0101-
73302004000300005&script=sci_abstract (Accessed 13/01/2013)
Ribeiro, G.L. (2005) ‘Neoliberalism and higher education in Brazil’ Anthropology in Action 12(1): 23-29
Ribeiro, C.A.C. (2011) ‘Inequality of opportunities and educational outcomes in Brazil’ Dados: Revista
de Ciências Sociais 54(1): 41-87, Available online at: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/dados/v54n1/02.pdf
(Accessed 17/01/2013)
Schwartzman, S. (2004) ‘Equity, quality and relevance in higher education in Brazil’ Anais da Academia
Brasileira de Ciências 76(1): 173-188, Available online at:
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aabc/v76n1/a15v76n1.pdf (Accessed 15/01/2013)
Sumner, A. & M. Tribe (2008) International Development Studies: Theories and Methods in Research
and Practice, London: SAGE Publications Ltd
Tarabini, A. (2010) ‘Education and poverty in the global development agenda: Emergence, evolution and
consolidation’ International Journal of Educational Development 30: 204-212
Torche, F. (2010) ‘Economic Crisis and Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Latin America’
Sociology of Education 83(2): 85-110, Available online at:
http://soe.sagepub.com.ezproxy.leidenuniv.nl:2048/content/83/2/85.full.pdf+html (Accessed 17/01/2013)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 91
UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Division for the Promotion
of Basic Education, Education Sector (July 2006) ‘Policy Review Report: Early Childhood Care and
Education in Brazil’ UNESCO/OECD Early Childhood Policy Review Project, Available online at:
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001512/151271e.pdf (Accessed 15/01/2013)
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2011) Brazil, Country Profile: International Human
Development Indicators, Available online at: http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/BRA.html
(Accessed 02/06/2012)
United Nations Development Programme – Human Development Reports (2011) Inequality-adjusted
Human Development Index (IHDI) Available online at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ihdi/ (Accessed
12/12/2012)
United Nations, Department of Field Support Cartographic Section (2010) Available online at:
http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/eclac.pdf (Accessed 28/12/2012)
World Bank (2005) ‘Brazil’s Bolsa Escola Program: The Role of Local Governance in Decentralized
Implementation’ Social Safety Nets Primer Series (Social Protection, World Bank Institute) Available
online at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOCIALPROTECTION/Resources/SP-Discussion-
papers/Safety-Nets-DP/0542.pdf (Accessed 28/12/2012)
World Bank (2008) Accessibility and Affordability of Tertiary Education in Brazil, Colombia, Mexico and
Peru within a Global Context (Latin America and Caribbean Region, World Bank Human Development
Sector) Available online at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-
1099079877269/547664-1099079956815/wps4517.pdf (Accessed 28/12/2012)
Internet Sources:
www.4icu.org/reviews/344.shtm (Accessed 16/12/2012)
http://americanlivewire.com/top-10-largest-cities-in-the-world-2013/ (Accessed 29/12/2012)
http://www.blatantworld.com/feature/the_world/most_populous_metropolitan_areas.html
(Accessed 29/12/2012)
http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/BZMW:IND (Accessed 16/12/2012)
http://www.educamaisbrasil.com/ (Accessed 02/01/2013)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 92
http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2015/Government-Education-Changing-Role.html
(Accessed 24/05/2012)
http://www.indexmundi.com/brazil/major_cities_population.html (Accessed 29/12/2012)
http://www.mackenzie.com.br/mensalidades.html (Accessed 18/01/2013)
http://www.maisestudo.com.br/ (Accessed 02/01/2013)
http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/latin-american-university-rankings/2012
(Accessed 16/12/2012)
http://www.usnews.com/education/worlds-best-universities-rankings/best-universities-in-latin-
america (Accessed 05/12/2012)
http://www.v-brazil.com/tourism/sao-paulo/map-sao-paulo.html (Accessed 28/12/2012)
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 93
Appendix I: Interview Guide
These are the questions for the interviews with the students from the low-cost private universities Unip,
Uninove, Unisant’anna and Anhanguera.
1. Name
Pode me dizer seu nome completo?
2. Sex
Genero
3. Age
Quantos anos tem?
4. Where are you from? Where did you grow up?
De onde é você? Aonde voce creceu?
a. If not from Sao Paulo, why did you/your parents come to SP?
Caso no seja Sao Paulo, Porque você/seus pais viram para São Paulo?
5. Where are your parents from?
De onde são seus pais?
6. To which primary and secondary schools did you go? Were these public or private schools?
A quais instituições de ensino básico e meio você assistiu? São escolas privadas ou publicas?
7. What do you think of the quality of these schools?
O que você acha da qualidade dessas escolas?
8. Did your parents or one of your parents go to university?
Seus pais (ou algum deles) assistiram na universidade?
a. If yes, which one? Public or private?
Caso afirmativo, Qual unversidade? Publica ou privada?
b. If not, what is their highest level of education? Was this public or private?
Caso negativo, Qual é o maior grau de educação deles? Foi educação privada ou publica?
9. What do your parents do now? What kind of job do they have?
O que fazem seus pais? Que tipo de trabalho têm eles?
10. Why did you choose to go to university?
Porque você escolheu assistir à universidade?
11. What is your reason for choosing this particular university?
Porque ecolheu issa universidade em particular?
12. Do you believe you had many options/opportunities to choose from when choosing a university?
Voce acredita que tevi diferentes opções/oportunidades na hora de escolher uma universidade?
13. Do you think your primary and secondary school affected your possibility of choosing a
university?
Você acha que a sua escola primaria e secundaria afectou suas possibilidades na hora de escolher
uma carreira ou universidade?
14. Was this your first choice of universities?
Foi sua universidade a primeira opção ou mais accessível?
a. If not, which was one was?
Caso contrario qual foi?
b. And, why did you not go to this university?
Porque não decidiu assistir à outra universidade
15. Do you feel your past schools have prepared you well for the vestibular of a public (federal or
state) university?
Você acha que o ensino basico e meio prepararam bem você para a vestibular?
a. If not, why not?
Caso negative, porque não?
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 94
16. Did you do the vestibular of a public university? Did you find this difficult?
Você fez o vestibular? Você achou dificil o mesmo?
17. What did you think of the vestibular to enter in this university you are currently studying?
O que você achou do vestibular para entrar nesta universidade que você está estudando?
18. How much do you pay for tuition fees?
Quanto você paga pelo seu estudo universitario?
19. Do you consider this a lot of money for you?
Você acha isso é muito dinheiro para você?
20. Do you have a job?
Você trabalha?
a. If yes, part-time or fulltime?
Trabalho horario integral ou part-time?
b. Also, if you would not have this job, would you still be able to continue your studies?
Se você não tivesse esse trabalho, poderia continuar seus estudos?
21. Are your parents involved or interested in your education?
Seus pais fazem um seguimento do seus estudos ou tem interesse neles?
22. Do you feel they motivate you to continue studying? Do they support your decision to go to
university?
Você acha que eles motivam você para continuar estudando? Eles apoiam você na desição de
assistir na universidade?
23. Do your parents support you financially?
Seus pais oferecem algum tipo de assistencia economica?
24. Do you feel your parents expect you to support them by working for example? Or do you perhaps
feel your parents expect you to go to university and get a university degree?
Você acha que o seus pais esperam que você mantenha eles economicamente trabalhando? Ou
você acha que o seus pais esperam você assita à universidade e obtenha seu diploma?
25. Do you live with your parents?
Você mora com seus pais?
a. If yes, would you like to live alone?
Caso afirmativo, Gostaria de morar sozinho?
i. If yes, why don’t you?
Caso afirmativo, porque não vai morar sozinho?
ii. If not, but could you afford to live alone?
Caso negative, você tem as possibilidades economicas de morar sozinho se
quiser?
26. Do you receive any financial aid in the form of loan (FIES) or a bolsa (PROUNI, CNPq, CAPES,
Escola Familia, etc.)?
Você recebe algum tipo de assistencia economica financeira?
a. If yes, how much is this?
Caso que sim, quanto dinheiro seria?
b. If the payment would stop, would you still be able to continue your studies?
Se o governo deixare de assistir você poderia continuar seus estudos?
27. What do you think of PROUNI in relation to ENEM? (Scoring high on ENEM provides students
the opportunity to receive more money from the government within the PROUNI program.)
O que você acha de PROUNI em relação a ENEM?
28. What are you currently studying? And, in which year of your studies are you?
O que você esta estudando? Você esta cursando qual ano do seus estudos?
29. Do you like your studies?
Você gosta do seus estudos?
30. Do you think you will be able to finish your studies?
Você acha que vai termirar o seus estudos?
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 95
a. If not, why not?
Caso negative, por qual motivo?
31. Are you involved in any extracurricular activities besides your studies (such as a student
organization, volunteer work, etc.)?
Você faz algum tipo de actividade extracurricular ( trabalho voluntario, pertenecer a uma
organizção estudiantil, etc)
a. If yes, do you feel you can manage this well in combination with your studies?
Caso afirmativo, Você acha que pode combinar seus estudos com issas activdades sem
problemas?
b. If not, why not? Would you like to do get involved in any activities?
Caso negative, Porque não? Você gostaria de fazer algum desses tipos de actividades?
32. What do you think of the quality of your studies/university?
O que você acha da qualidade do seus estudos/universidade?
33. Do you feel your teachers have as main goal to provide you of good quality education? Do you
feel motivated by them to continue studying?
Você acha que o principal objetivo do seus professores é lhe oferecer uma educação de boa
qualidade? Você sente que eles lhe motivam para continuar estudando?
34. How do you manage your studies (in combination with work/family/friends/etc)
Como você gere seus estudos (em combinação com sua familia, amigos, trabalho, etc?
35. What do you expect to gain by studying at a university?
O que você espera obter estudando numa universidade?
36. Are you planning on pursuing a master’s degree?
Você tem pensado começar algum tipo de estudo de post-graduação (máster)?
a. If not, why not?
Porque não?
37. Do you think having a university degree (graduacao/pos-graduacao) will get you a better job?
Você acha que tendo um titulo universitario você pode obter um melhor trabalho?
38. Do you think having a university degree (graduacao/pos-graduacao) will get you a better salary?
Você acha que tendo um titulo universitario você pode obter um melhor salario?
39. Would you like to do a PhD in the future?
Você gostaria de fazer um doutorado no futuro?
40. What expectations do you have regarding your career opportunities?
Qual expectativas você tem em relação às oportunidades para sua carreira?
a. Where would you like to work?
Aonde gostaria de trabalhar?
b. Do you think you will get accepted/hired here?
Você acha que seria aceitado aqui?
41. Do you think your studies/university is preparing you well for the “market”?
Você acha que o seus estudos/universidade esta oferecendo uma boa preparação para enfrentar o
mercado?
42. Do you think you have an equal chance with regard to a job position in comparison to students
from a public university, such as USP?
Você acha que tem iguais possibilidades em relação a uma vaga laboral em comparação com um
estudante de uma universidade federal como a USP?
43. Are you willing to participate in a group discussion with other students in the near future?
Você gostaria de participar num grupo de discussão com outros estudantes num future proximo?
Michal Ragowan Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Higher Education Page 96
Appendix II: Overview Respondents
Respondent Name Sex Age University
1 Emerson M 38 Uninove
2 Raisa F 21 Uninove
3 Flavia F 40 Unisant'anna
4 Paulo M 24 Unisant'anna
5 Tiago M 24 Anonymous
6 Caio M 24 Unisant'anna
7 Joice F 19 Unisant'anna
8 Jorge M 37 Unisant'anna
9 Evandro M 30 Unisant'anna
10 Solon M 22 UNIP
11 Guilherme M 47 Uninove
12 Henrique M 22 Unisant'anna
13 Natacha F 21 Unisant'anna
14 Cristiane F 29 UNIP-RP
15 Rafaela F 22 UNIP-RP
16 Daisy F 51 UNIP-RP
17 Rodrigo M 22 UNIP-RP
18 Jacqueline F 30 UNIP-RP
19 Patricia F 28 UNIP-RP
20 Felipe M 22 UNIP
21 Gleici F 23 Anhanguera
22 Guilherme M 21 Uninove