infant microbiome in health and disease: current ... · joe petrosino tatiana fofanova tommy...

33
Infant microbiome in health and disease: current understanding and future direction Dr. Christopher J Stewart, PhD SIGNEC 2018 October 2018

Upload: trinhhuong

Post on 19-Aug-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Infant microbiome in health and disease:

current understanding and future

direction

Dr. Christopher J Stewart, PhD

SIGNEC 2018

October 2018

Disclosures

Support from Danone Nutricia to be at SIGNEC 2018

Agenda

1. Term infant2. Preterm infant3. Looking ahead

Translation

What is the Microbiome?

Micro – SmallBiome – Community that occupies a distinct environment

Proportion of cells in the human body

Gaby D'Allesandro / © AMNH

Aagaard, Stewart, Chu. EMBO Reports. 2016;17(12):1679-1684

Gut microbiome

Stewart CJ et al. Nature. 2018; Vatanen T et al. Nature. 2018.

Development of the gut microbiome early in life

Gut microbiome phases

Stewart CJ et al. Nature. 2018.

Significance and explained variance of 22 microbiome covariates

Metagenomics - Species10,602 samples

783 children

Metagenomics - Module (function)10,602 samples

783 children

Stewart CJ et al. Nature. 2018.

BM increases Bifidobacterium and delays microbiome maturation

Stewart CJ et al. Nature. 2018.

BM increases Bifidobacterium and delays microbiome maturation

Stewart CJ et al. Nature. 2018.

Human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs)

Zivkovic AM et al. Food Rev In. 2013.

Bifidobacterium growth assays

Vatanen T et al. Nature. 2018.

Epidemiological association of breast milk with later life disease

Dogaru et al., Am J Epidemiology (2013)

Allergy - 117 study meta-analysis

Davis et al., Diabetes Care (2006)

Obesity – 15,253 children age 9-14 years old

Agenda

1. Term infant2. Preterm infant3. Looking ahead

Translation

Key differences in microbiome acquisition and development

Term infantPreterm infant

Child

?

Reduced:

Diversity

Stability

Bifidobacterium sp.

Lactobacillus sp.

Bacteroides sp.

Increased:

Klebsiella sp.

Staphylococcus sp.

Escherichia sp.

Enterococcus sp.

1-3 Yearsof age

Full termPreterm

Stewart and Cummings, Taylor & Francis. 2016

●● ●

●● ● ● ●

● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

● ● ●

●● ●

● ●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ● ● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●

●● ●

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0 25 50 75 100DOL

Alp

ha

Div

ers

ity

Disease●

ControlLOSNEC

DOL

Shan

nonDiversity

4.0

PD1 – 3 Yr

●● ●

●● ● ● ●

● ●●

●●

●● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

● ●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●●

● ● ● ●

● ●

●●

●● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

● ●

● ● ●

● ●

●●

● ●

●●

● ● ●

●● ●

● ●

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

● ● ● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

● ●

●● ●

● ●

● ●● ●

●●

● ● ●

●● ●

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

0 25 50 75 100DOL

Alp

ha

Div

ers

ity

Disease●

ControlLOSNEC

DOL

Shan

nonDiversity

Preterm infants restore diversity post-discharge from NICU

Day of life

Stewart, CJ. et al., Nature Scientific Reports (2016)

Preterm microbiome and NEC

Warner, BB. et al. 2016. Lancet

• Increased Gammaproteobacteria in infants diagnosed with NEC after day 30 of life only• Most NEC is diagnosed prior to day 30 of life

• Shannon diversity generally decreased in NEC

n = 46 NEC casesn = 120 controls

Preterm microbiome and NEC

Pammi, M. et al. 2016. Microbiome

• Potentially some differences between NEC and controls, but not predictive of onset

8 studies (106 NEC cases, 278 controls, 2944 samples)

Microbiome modelling of NEC and LOS

Stewart, CJ. et al. 2016. Microbiome 7 NEC / 7 LOS / 28 matched controls. 747 samples

Bifidobacterium and diversity associated with protection from NEC and LOS

Stewart, CJ. et al. 2016. Microbiome

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

Adj. P = 1.7e−13

● ●

●●●●

Adj. P = 2.9e−61

Observed OTUs Shannon

0

10

20

30

40

50

0

1

2

A B C D E F A B C D E FA

lph

a D

iversity

PGSTletterABCDEF

1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6PGCT PGCT

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●●●●

●●●●

●●●●●

●●●●●●●

●●●●●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●

●●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●●●●●

●●

●●●●●

●●●●

●●

●●●●

●●

●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●

●●

●●●●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●

●● ●

●●●●●●

●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●

●●●●●●●●●●● ●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●●

●●●●●●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●●

●●

●●●

●●

● ●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●

●●●

●●●

●●

●●●

●●

*** *** ****** ****** *** ****** ***

4%

16%

36%

64%

100%

K.oxytocea

E.coliE.faecalis

S.aureus

Bifidobacterium

Clostr idium_sensu_stricto

Streptococcus

Lactobacillus

Morganella

Veillonella

Re

lative

Abu

nd

an

ce

PGSTletter

A

B

C

D

E

F

123456

A B

C

StatusPGCT

PGCT

K.oxtocea

E.coli

PGCT

S.aureus

E.faecalis

Bifidobacteria

1 2 3 4 5 6

NEC microbiome highly unstable

1

2

3

4

5

6

PGCT

Klebsiella

Staphylococcus

Enterococcus

Escherichia

Klebsiella + Enterococcus

Bifidobacteria

Stewart, CJ. et al. 2016. Microbiome

NEC vs. SIP tissue

Stewart, CJ. et al. Unpublished

13 NEC 16 SIP

Altered alpha- and beta-diversity in NEC

Stewart, CJ. et al. Unpublished

Significantly altered phyla in NEC

Stewart, CJ. et al. Unpublished

Phyla

Genera

Agenda

1. Term infant2. Preterm infant3. Looking ahead

Translation

Preterm enteroids to study host-microbiome in health and disease

Example usesEpithelial integrity

Bacterial translocationInflammatory responses

Collaborative neonatal trials

Speed of Increases in Feeds Trial

SIFT n=2804

Enteral lactoferrin in Neonates

ELFIN n=2204

Interactions between diet and growth outcomes

Exclusive human milk (Prolacta)

INDIGO n=50/100

INDIGO

Mechanisms Affecting the Gut of Preterm Infants in Enteral feeding studies (MAGPIE)

Immune(Transcriptome)

Microbiome

VOCsMetabolome

Stool

Urine

Salvaged blood / Resected tissue

MAGPIE n=481

Collaborative neonatal biobanks

Great North Neonatal BiobankRoyal Victoria Infirmary~700 preterm infants ~10,000 stool samples~3,000 Urine samples~3,000 Serum samples

MAGPIE12 UK centers~500 preterm infants~15,000 stool samples~25,000 urine samples

Future Direction

‘Omics

Discovery Translation

Models

Clinic

Diagnostics/ Therapeutics

Samples

Clinic

HumanInterventions

Joe PetrosinoTatiana FofanovaTommy AuchtungMary EstesSasirekha RamaniUmesh KarandikarJennifer AuchtungAmy Hair

Acknowledgements

Chris LambJohn KirbySophie HambletonRebecca Payne

Janet BerringtonNick Embleton

Tommi VatanenCurtis HuttenhowerRamnik Xavier

Jonathan MansbachKohei HasegawaCarlos Camargo

@CJStewart7

[email protected]

neonatalresearch.net