influence of a fat-rich diet, folic acid supplementation and a human-relevant concentration of...

7
GENOTOXICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY Influence of a fat-rich diet, folic acid supplementation and a human-relevant concentration of 2-amino-1-methyl- 6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine on the induction of preneoplastic lesions in the rat colon Petra Nicken Nicole Brauer Alfonso Lampen Pablo Steinberg Received: 14 November 2011 / Accepted: 14 February 2012 / Published online: 28 February 2012 Ó Springer-Verlag 2012 Abstract In the present study, the effect of three con- troversially discussed risk factors for colorectal cancer, a fat-rich diet (16% raw fat content), dietary folic acid supplementation (50 mg folic acid/kg lab chow) and a human-relevant concentration (0.1 ppm) of the heterocy- clic aromatic amine 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), either alone or in combination, on the induction of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in the colon of male Fischer 344 rats was analyzed. The mean number of ACF per rat in the case of the four groups fed a fat-rich diet tended to be higher than that of the four groups being fed a standard diet. However, the increase in the mean number of ACF per rat only reached statistical significance in the case of the rats receiving a fat-rich lab chow supplemented with 50 mg/kg folic acid. Moreover, a concentration of 0.1 ppm PhIP per se, either in the standard or in the fat-rich lab chow, did not lead to an increase in the mean number of ACF per rat. In conclusion, the present study provides additional evidence for a colon cancer promoting effect of folic acid supplementation when rodents are fed the com- pound in supraphysiological concentrations. Keywords Aberrant crypt foci Á Colorectal cancer Á Fat-rich diet Á Folic acid Á Heterocyclic aromatic amines Introduction Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men (6,63,000 cases, 10% of the total) and the second in women (5,71,000 cases, 9.4% of the total) worldwide (Ferlay et al. 2010; Jemal et al. 2011). Moreover, about 6,08,000 deaths from colorectal cancer are estimated worldwide, account- ing for 8% of all cancer deaths and making it the fourth most common cause of death from cancer. As early as in 1999, a scientific panel of the World Health Organization postulated that consumption of red meat and particularly of processed meat most probably enhances the risk to develop colorectal cancer (Scheppach et al. 1999). In 2007, a joint committee of the World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research reviewed the available scientific literature and concluded that red meat as well as processed meat is a convincing cause of colo- rectal cancer (World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research 2007). In this regard, it has been suggested that heterocyclic aromatic amines (HCAs) being formed when muscle meat is strongly heated may trigger colorectal cancer development (Sinha et al. 2001, 2005; Shin et al. 2007; Rohrmann et al. 2009; Zheng and Lee 2009; Cross et al. 2010). HCAs are pyrolysis products derived from amino acids or proteins that emerge when protein-rich food is fried, grilled, or cooked. They are particularly formed on the surface of strongly heated fish and meat, but low levels of HCAs have also been detected in white and red wine, in different beer types and in the tar fraction of cigarettes. Among the various HCAs known, the quantitatively most important one in fish and meat samples is 2-amino-1- methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). PhIP is mutagenic in bacteria and in mammalian cells (Thompson et al. 1987) and carcinogenic in the colon of male rats P. Nicken Á N. Brauer Á P. Steinberg (&) Institute for Food Toxicology and Analytical Chemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany e-mail: [email protected] A. Lampen Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Thielallee 88-92, 14195 Berlin, Germany 123 Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821 DOI 10.1007/s00204-012-0819-1

Upload: pablo-steinberg

Post on 20-Aug-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

GENOTOXICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY

Influence of a fat-rich diet, folic acid supplementationand a human-relevant concentration of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine on the inductionof preneoplastic lesions in the rat colon

Petra Nicken • Nicole Brauer • Alfonso Lampen •

Pablo Steinberg

Received: 14 November 2011 / Accepted: 14 February 2012 / Published online: 28 February 2012

� Springer-Verlag 2012

Abstract In the present study, the effect of three con-

troversially discussed risk factors for colorectal cancer, a

fat-rich diet (16% raw fat content), dietary folic acid

supplementation (50 mg folic acid/kg lab chow) and a

human-relevant concentration (0.1 ppm) of the heterocy-

clic aromatic amine 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo

[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), either alone or in combination, on

the induction of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in the colon of

male Fischer 344 rats was analyzed. The mean number of

ACF per rat in the case of the four groups fed a fat-rich diet

tended to be higher than that of the four groups being fed a

standard diet. However, the increase in the mean number of

ACF per rat only reached statistical significance in the case

of the rats receiving a fat-rich lab chow supplemented with

50 mg/kg folic acid. Moreover, a concentration of 0.1 ppm

PhIP per se, either in the standard or in the fat-rich lab

chow, did not lead to an increase in the mean number of

ACF per rat. In conclusion, the present study provides

additional evidence for a colon cancer promoting effect of

folic acid supplementation when rodents are fed the com-

pound in supraphysiological concentrations.

Keywords Aberrant crypt foci � Colorectal cancer �Fat-rich diet � Folic acid � Heterocyclic aromatic amines

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men

(6,63,000 cases, 10% of the total) and the second in women

(5,71,000 cases, 9.4% of the total) worldwide (Ferlay et al.

2010; Jemal et al. 2011). Moreover, about 6,08,000 deaths

from colorectal cancer are estimated worldwide, account-

ing for 8% of all cancer deaths and making it the fourth

most common cause of death from cancer. As early as in

1999, a scientific panel of the World Health Organization

postulated that consumption of red meat and particularly of

processed meat most probably enhances the risk to develop

colorectal cancer (Scheppach et al. 1999). In 2007, a joint

committee of the World Cancer Research Fund and the

American Institute for Cancer Research reviewed the

available scientific literature and concluded that red meat

as well as processed meat is a convincing cause of colo-

rectal cancer (World Cancer Research Fund/American

Institute for Cancer Research 2007). In this regard, it has

been suggested that heterocyclic aromatic amines (HCAs)

being formed when muscle meat is strongly heated may

trigger colorectal cancer development (Sinha et al. 2001,

2005; Shin et al. 2007; Rohrmann et al. 2009; Zheng and

Lee 2009; Cross et al. 2010).

HCAs are pyrolysis products derived from amino acids

or proteins that emerge when protein-rich food is fried,

grilled, or cooked. They are particularly formed on the

surface of strongly heated fish and meat, but low levels of

HCAs have also been detected in white and red wine, in

different beer types and in the tar fraction of cigarettes.

Among the various HCAs known, the quantitatively most

important one in fish and meat samples is 2-amino-1-

methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). PhIP is

mutagenic in bacteria and in mammalian cells (Thompson

et al. 1987) and carcinogenic in the colon of male rats

P. Nicken � N. Brauer � P. Steinberg (&)

Institute for Food Toxicology and Analytical Chemistry,

University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover,

Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany

e-mail: [email protected]

A. Lampen

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Thielallee 88-92,

14195 Berlin, Germany

123

Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821

DOI 10.1007/s00204-012-0819-1

(Ito et al. 1991; Hasegawa et al. 1993). It should be noted that

in the case of the studies by Ito et al. (1991) and Hasegawa

et al. (1993) as well as in most of the later reports having been

published in the scientific literature and dealing with the

induction of colon carcinomas by PhIP, rats were fed with

extremely high (i.e., totally human-irrelevant) amounts of

PhIP in the range of 100 to 400 ppm. In contrast, in those

feeding studies, in which PhIP was used in human-relevant

concentrations (i.e., \0.1 ppm), no preneoplastic or neo-

plastic lesions were induced (Fukushima et al. 2004; Doi

et al. 2005; Kuhnel et al. 2009), whereby in these three

studies PhIP was added to standard rat chow.

Various studies reported that high levels of dietary fat

were able to enhance colon epithelial cell proliferation,

thereby promoting colon carcinogenesis (Thornton and

MacDonald 1997; Kim et al. 1998; Fujise et al. 2007). In

accordance with these observations Ochiai et al. (1996) and

Ubagai et al. (2002) showed that a fat-rich diet strongly

enhanced the induction of preneoplastic lesions in the

colon of rats fed 400 ppm PhIP (Ochiai et al. 1996; Ubagai

et al. 2002). However, up to now it is not known whether a

human-relevant concentration of PhIP added to a fat-rich

diet could eventually lead to the formation of colonic

lesions.

Folic acid fortification of cereal grain flour was fully

implemented in the United States and Canada in 1998 and

has led to a significant reduction in neural tube defects in

neonates (Berry et al. 2010). In this context, the possibility

that folic acid fortification may enhance the risk to develop

colorectal carcinomas is a matter of considerable debate.

On the one hand, Mason et al. (2007) highlighted a tem-

poral association between folic acid fortification of enri-

ched cereal grains in the United States and Canada and an

increase in the incidence of colorectal carcinomas in these

two countries. Furthermore, in a multicenter study by Cole

et al. (2007), the safety and efficacy of folic acid supple-

mentation (1 mg/day, in part in combination with aspirin)

for preventing colorectal adenomas was analyzed in par-

ticipants with a recent history of colorectal adenomas.

Three to 5 years after beginning folic acid supplementa-

tion, the risk of developing advanced colorectal lesions,

multiple (C3) colorectal adenomas as well as noncolorectal

cancers (prostate cancer) was significantly increased (Cole

et al. 2007). On the other hand, very recent studies show

that folic acid fortification actually reduces the risk to

develop colorectal cancer (Gibson et al. 2011; Kennedy

et al. 2011; Lee et al. 2011; Stevens et al. 2011).

In a limited number of animal studies, the effect of

supraphysiological levels of folic acid on colon carcino-

genesis has been analyzed. Kim et al. (1996) reported a

nonsignificant trend toward increased colorectal tumori-

genesis in Sprague–Dawley rats treated with 1,2-dimeth-

ylhydrazine and fed a supraphysiological dose of folic acid

(40 mg folic acid/kg diet, i.e., 20 times the daily folic

acid requirement of rats). In support of this early finding,

azoxymethane in combination with a dietary folic acid

supplementation exceeding the basal requirements of rats

by 1,000 times (2.0–5.0 g folic acid/kg diet) significantly

increased the number of so-called aberrant crypt foci

(ACF), preneoplastic lesions in the rat colon (Bird 1987;

Tudek et al. 1989), when compared to the combination of

the above-mentioned colon carcinogen and a standard diet

including 2 mg folic acid/kg diet in Fischer 344 rats

(Reddy et al. 1996; Wargovich et al. 1996, 2000). Kim

(2004) hypothesized that in a strongly procarcinogenic

environment, in which the appearance of microscopic

neoplasms is inevitable, exceptionally high folic acid

supplementation may promote the progression of chemi-

cally induced colorectal neoplastic lesions. Up to now, it is

not known whether a supraphysiological level of folic acid

combined with a fat-rich diet and/or a human-relevant

concentration of PhIP will enhance the induction of ACF in

the rat colon.

In the present study, the effect of three controversially

discussed risk factors for colorectal cancer, a fat-rich diet,

dietary folic acid supplementation and a human-relevant

concentration of PhIP, either alone or in combination, on

the induction of ACF in the colon of Fischer 344 rats was

analyzed.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

All chemicals were of reagent grade and from commercial

sources. PhIP was obtained from Albrecht Seidel (Bio-

chemisches Institut fur Umweltcarcinogene, Großhansdorf,

Germany).

Animals and diets

Five to six-week-old male Fischer 344 rats were purchased

from Charles River WIGA (Deutschland) GmbH (Sulzfeld,

Germany) and allowed to acclimatize to the housing con-

ditions for 4 weeks before the start of the experiment. One

animal per cage was held under specific pathogen-free

conditions at a room temperature of 22�C, 40–60% air

humidity, a fixed 16/8 h day and night cycle and free

access to food and water. PhIP was added to a standard

rodent lab chow and a fat-rich rodent lab chow from

Altromin Spezialfutter (Lage, Germany) to give a final

PhIP concentration of 0.1 ppm. The raw fat content of the

standard and the fat-rich lab rodent chow was 5 and 16%,

respectively. The concentration of the various fatty acids in

the standard and fat-rich diet is listed in Table 1. The

816 Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821

123

physiological and supraphysiological concentration of folic

acid in the standard and the fat-rich rodent lab chow was 2

and 50 mg/kg, respectively. All diets were regularly ana-

lyzed for the presence of mutagenic compounds such as

N-nitrosamines and aflatoxins by the manufacturer (Altro-

min Spezialfutter) and were consistently tested negative

throughout the whole experimental period. The animal

study was approved by the local regulatory agency for

animal experiments (Niedersachsisches Landesamt fur

Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Oldenburg,

Germany [approval number 33.9-42502-04-09/1729]).

Experimental design

Rats were randomly divided into 8 groups of 12 animals

each. Group 1 was fed with the standard lab chow (5% raw

fat and 2 mg/kg folic acid), group 2 with the standard lab

chow (5% raw fat, 2 mg/kg folic acid) containing 0.1 ppm

PhIP, group 3 with the lab chow containing 5% raw fat and

50 mg/kg folic acid, group 4 with the lab chow containing

5% raw fat, 50 mg/kg folic acid and 0.1 ppm PhIP, group 5

with the fat-rich lab chow (16% raw fat and 2 mg/kg folic

acid), group 6 with the fat-rich lab chow (16% raw fat,

2 mg/kg folic acid) containing 0.1 ppm PhIP, group 7 with

the lab chow containing 16% raw fat and 50 mg/kg folic

acid, and group 8 with the lab chow containing 16% raw

fat, 50 mg/kg folic acid and 0.1 ppm PhIP. Body weight

and food consumption were recorded weekly. All animals

were killed after 12 months by decapitation following CO2

inhalation. The entire large intestine was removed for

dissection and flushed with cold phosphate buffered saline

solution (PBS) to remove intestinal content. The tissue was

opened longitudinally, washed extensively with PBS, and

fixed in 4% formalin (Roti�-Histofix 4%; Carl Roth,

Karlsruhe, Germany).

Histology

The formalin-fixed tissues were stained with a 0.1% w/v

methylene blue solution in PBS for 10 min. Thereafter, the

tissue was washed with PBS and the number of ACF per

animal was determined by making use of a SZX16 ste-

reomicroscope from Olympus (Hamburg, Germany).

Statistics

The body and liver weight data were subjected to an

analysis of variance, and the statistical significance was

established by using Tukey’s post hoc test. The data on the

number of ACF per animal were analyzed with the Kruskal–

Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test.

Results

Six out of 96 rats died before the end of the feeding period

of 12 months (one animal in group 2, three animals in

group 5, and two animals in group 6), the overall mortality

of 6.25% being very low. No statistically significant dif-

ference in food consumption was observed between the

different groups, rats in groups 1–8 consuming 90 ± 8,

89 ± 8, 94 ± 8, 91 ± 11, 86 ± 11, 101 ± 9, 101 ± 10,

and 103 ± 10 g food/week, respectively. Based on the

weekly food consumption, rats fed 0.1 ppm PhIP (i.e.,

those in groups 2, 4, 6, and 8) took up 8.8–10.2 lg PhIP/

rat/week. In the case of the groups 5–8, which had been fed

the fat-rich lab chow, the body weight was 12–21% higher

than in the groups 1–4, which had received the standard lab

chow (Table 2). Furthermore, the mean weight of the rats

in the groups 6–8 was significantly higher than that of the

rats in group 5. The feeding of the fat-rich lab chow led to a

strong fat accumulation in the liver, the mean liver weight

in the groups 5–8 being 2 to 2.4-fold higher than in the

groups 1–4 (Table 2).

Table 1 Raw fat content and concentration of the various fatty acids

in the standard and fat-rich diet

Constituent Content (mg/kg feed)

Standard diet Fat-rich diet

Raw fat 50,843.333 159,967.560

Capric acid C-10:0 2.500 2,302.500

Lauric acid C-12:0 2.500 2,502.500

Myristic acid C-14:0 2.500 11,002.500

Pentadecanoic acid C-15:0 2.500 1,002.500

Palmitic acid C-16:0 2,700.000 31,700.000

Palmitoleic acid C-16:1 2.500 4,502.500

Heptadecanoic acid C-17:0 2.500 1,002.500

Stearic acid C-18:0 1,250.000 10,250.000

Oleic acid C-18:1 10,950.000 37,450.000

Linoleic acid C-18:2 35,050.000 39,800.000

Linolenic acid C-18:3 150.000 150.000

Arachidic acid C-20:0 250.000 2,550.000

Eicosenoic acid C-20:1 250.000 250.000

Eicosadienoic acid C-20:2 250.000 250.000

Arachidonic acid C-20:4 2.500 2.500

Eicosapentaenoic acid C-20:5 2.500 2.500

Behenic acid C-22:0 250.000 250.000

Docosahexaenoic acid C-22:6 2.500 2.500

Tricosanoic acid C-23:0 2.500 2.500

Nervonic acid C-24:1 2.500 2.500

Erucic acid C-22:1 2.500 1,402.500

Butyric acid C-4:0 0.000 3,500.000

Caproic acid C-7:0 0.000 2,000.000

Caprylic acid C-8:0 0.000 500.000

Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821 817

123

The mean number of ACF per rat in the different groups

is shown in Fig. 1. It is evident that the mean number of

ACF per rat in the case of the four groups that received a

fat-rich lab chow tended to be higher than that of the four

groups being fed a standard lab chow. However, the above-

mentioned increase in the mean number of ACF per rat

only reached statistical significance in the case of the rats

receiving a fat-rich lab chow supplemented with 50 mg/kg

folic acid (group 7) (Fig. 1). Moreover, a concentration of

0.1 ppm PhIP per se, either in the standard or in the fat-rich

lab chow, did not lead to an increase in the mean number of

ACF per rat (Fig. 1).

Discussion

Various surveys have shown that the daily uptake of HCAs

in general does not exceed the amount of 1 lg per person

(Rohrmann et al. 2009; Carthew et al. 2010). Because of

this extremely low exposure level, the Senate Commission

on Food Safety of the German Research Foundation (1998)

came to the conclusion that the risk to develop colorectal

cancer due to the presence of HCAs in food is very low.

This early evaluation is supported by a very recent study by

Carthew et al. (2010), in which the calculated ‘‘Margin Of

Exposure’’ (MOE) value for PhIP was extremely high

(i.e., [100.000). The MOE value represents the quotient

between the doses of a compound causing cancer in ani-

mals and the estimated exposure level of humans to that

compound. If the calculated MOE value is lower than

10.000, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) con-

siders the carcinogenic risk of a compound to humans to be

high; if it is greater than 10.000, the carcinogenic risk is

supposed to be low. In the present study, feeding a human-

relevant concentration of PhIP either in a standard diet or in

a fat-enriched diet to rats did not lead to an increase in the

number of preneoplastic lesions (ACF) in the rat colon.

Thus, the results obtained herein experimentally support

previous evaluations that human-relevant concentrations of

PhIP alone or in combination with a fat-rich diet is not a

major factor leading to colorectal cancer in humans (Senate

Commission on Food Safety of the German Research

Foundation 1998; Santarelli et al. 2008; Carthew et al.

2010).

The fact that feeding 0.1 ppm PhIP for up to 12 months

did not lead to a statistically significant increase in the

number of ACF per rat is in accordance with previous

reports (Fukushima et al. 2004; Doi et al. 2005; Kuhnel

et al. 2009). In this context, Fukushima et al. (2004) pos-

tulated that a threshold of 50 ppm for the PhIP-mediated

induction of aberrant crypt foci in the rat colon can actually

be defined. Whereas it is evident from this and previous

studies (Fukushima et al. 2004; Doi et al. 2005; Kuhnel

et al. 2009) that a human-relevant concentration of PhIP

alone is not sufficient to initiate colon carcinogenesis, a

Table 2 Body and liver weight of rats fed the different diets for 12 months

Group Raw fat, folic acid and PhIP content of the feed Body weight (g)a Liver weight (g)a

1 5% Raw fat ? 2 mg/kg folic acid 442 ± 26 14.2 ± 0.8

2 5% Raw fat ? 2 mg/kg folic acid ? 0.1 ppm PhIP 429 ± 22 13.7 ± 0.9

3 5% Raw fat ? 50 mg/kg folic acid 444 ± 18 14.6 ± 0.8

4 5% Raw fat ? 50 mg/kg folic acid ? 0.1 ppm PhIP 428 ± 32 14.0 ± 1.5

5 16% Raw fat ? 2 mg/kg folic acid 481 ± 34b 27.2 ± 3.3b

6 16% Raw fat ? 2 mg/kg folic acid ? 0.1 ppm PhIP 519 ± 31b,c 30.0 ± 3.4b

7 16% Raw fat ? 50 mg/kg folic acid 515 ± 27b,c 31.5 ± 2.9b

8 16% Raw fat ? 50 mg/kg folic acid ? 0.1 ppm PhIP 517 ± 26b,c 32.4 ± 3.5b

a Shown is the mean ± standard deviation of 9–12 rats per groupb The mean of the groups 5, 6, 7, and 8 is significantly different from the mean of the groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (analysis of variance and

Tukey’s post hoc test; p \ 0.001)c The mean of the groups 6, 7, and 8 is significantly different from the mean of the group 5 (analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test;

p \ 0.05)

raw fat (%) 5

0

1

2

3

4

5

5 5 5 16 16 16 16

folic acid (mg/kg) 2 2 50 50 2 2 50 50

PhIP (mg/kg) 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1

***

*

nu

mb

er o

f A

CF

/rat

Fig. 1 Number of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) per rat after a 12-month

feeding period. The results are expressed as means ± SD of 9–12 rats

per group (statistically significant difference between the means of the

two groups, Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s post hoc test; *p \ 0.05;

**p \ 0.01)

818 Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821

123

mixture of food contaminants (e.g., HCAs, polycyclic

aromatic hydrocarbons, nitrosamines, acrylamide) could

very well overcome the threshold to induce preneoplastic

lesions in the colon. Further experiments are needed to

clarify this important open question in chemically induced

colon carcinogenesis.

The fact that the number of ACF pro rat in all four

experimental groups having been fed a fat-rich diet was,

although not statistically significant, higher than the num-

ber of ACF pro animal in the four experimental groups

receiving a standard lab chow suggests that a fat-rich diet

per se may support the development of ACF. In this con-

text, it has indeed been demonstrated that a fat-rich diet

strongly enhances the number of ACF in rats fed extremely

high concentrations of PhIP (400 ppm; Ochiai et al. 1996;

Ubagai et al. 2002) or azoxymethane (Nigro et al. 1975;

Bull et al. 1979). However, as shown in the present study, a

fat-rich diet does not lead to an increase in the number of

ACF pro animal when these are concomitantly fed a

human-relevant concentration of PhIP.

The most striking result of this study is that the feeding

of rats with a supraphysiological concentration of folic acid

and a fat-rich diet leads to a significant increase in the

number of ACF per rat. These observations are the first to

be made in rats that have not concomitantly received a

known carcinogen. Since folic acid is not mutagenic (i.e.,

does not possess tumor initiating activity) and the fat-rich

diet did not include any genotoxins such as N-nitrosamines

and aflatoxins (see ‘‘Materials and methods’’) with tumor

initiating activity, the question as to the initiating stimulus

for the ACF remains unanswered. However, it has been

known for a number of years now that Fischer 344 rats

spontaneously develop a limited number of ACF through-

out their lifespan (Furukawa et al. 2002), and this has been

corroborated in this study: a low number of ACF were seen

in the group of rats fed a standard diet containing physio-

logical amounts of folic acid. Hence, the results obtained

herein could very well be the consequence of a supra-

physiological concentration of folic acid promoting the

growth of spontaneously initiated ACF and together with

previous reports demonstrating that the growth of chemi-

cally initiated ACF is significantly stimulated by supra-

physiological levels of folic acid (Reddy et al. 1996;

Wargovich et al. 1996, 2000; Lindzon et al. 2009) lend

support to the concept that folic acid supplementation, once

early preneoplastic lesions such ACF (Bird 1987; Tudek

et al. 1989) have developed, promotes carcinogenesis (Kim

1999; Choi and Mason 2002; Kim 2003, 2004).

As to the mechanisms involved in the tumor promoting

activity of folic acid, it has been proposed that increased

DNA methylation leads to the silencing of the expression

of regulatory or mismatch repair genes, which in turn may

provide a growth advantage to the initiated cells (Shen and

Issa 2002; Issa 2004; Wallace et al. 2010). Furthermore, it

has very recently been shown that multiple pathways

related to inflammation and immune response were

upregulated in rectosigmoid biopsies from volunteers

receiving supplemental folic acid (1 mg/day) for 8 weeks

(Protiva et al. 2011). In the case of the fat-rich diet, it has

been proposed that it upregulates the activity of cycloox-

ygenase-2 (Singh et al. 1997; Rao et al. 2001), thereby

leading to the enhanced production of prostaglandin E2,

which results in the activation of multiple intracellular

signaling pathways, including the transactivation of the

epidermal growth factor receptor and G-protein-mediated

activation of b-catenin/TCF-dependent transcription (Wu

et al. 2010).

In summary, the present study provides additional evi-

dence for a colon cancer promoting effect of folic acid

supplementation when rodents are fed the compound in

supraphysiological concentrations. While folic acid sup-

plementation in humans may prevent the development of a

colorectal tumor in those people without a preexisting

preneoplastic lesion in the colorectum, folic acid supple-

mentation in those people with an existing preneoplastic

colorectal lesion may support the development of a colo-

rectal tumor (Cole et al. 2007; Fife et al. 2011). Regardless

of the ongoing discussion on the pros and cons of folic acid

supplementation to prevent colorectal cancer and based on

the overwhelming body of evidence supporting the pro-

tective effect of periconceptional folic acid supplementa-

tion against neural tube defects, cleft palate, spina bifida,

and anencephaly, the advice for women planning a preg-

nancy to increase folic acid intake during the preconception

period to prevent the above-mentioned pregnancy out-

comes remains valid.

Acknowledgments This study was supported by a grant from the

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment in Germany (grant FK 3-1329-

303).

References

Berry RJ, Bailey L, Mulinare J, Bower C, Folic Acid Working

Group (2010) Fortification of flour with folic acid. Food Nutr

Bull 31(1 Suppl):S22–S35

Bird RP (1987) Observation and quantification of aberrant crypts in

the murine colon treated with a colon carcinogen. Preliminary

findings. Cancer Lett 37:147–151

Bull AW, Soullier BK, Wilson PS, Hayden MT, Nigro ND (1979)

Promotion of azoxymethane-induced intestinal cancer by high-

fat diet in rats. Cancer Res 39:4956–4959

Carthew P, DiNovi M, Woodrow Setzer R (2010) Application of the

Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that

are genotoxic and carcinogenic. Example: CAS No: 105650–23-5

PhIP (2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine). Food

Chem Toxicol 48(Suppl 1):S98–S105

Choi SW, Mason JB (2002) Folate status: effects on pathways of

colorectal carcinogenesis. J Nutr 132(Suppl):2413S–2418S

Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821 819

123

Cole BF, Baron JA, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Ahnen DJ, Bresalier RS,

McKeown-Eyssen G, Summers RW, Rothstein RI, Burke CA,

Snover DC, Church TR, Allen JI, Robertson DJ, Beck GJ, Bond

JH, Byers T, Mandel JS, Mott LA, Pearson LH, Barry EL, Rees

JR, Marcon N, Saibil F, Ueland PM, Greenberg ER, Polyp

Prevention Study Group (2007) Folic acid for the prevention of

colorectal adenomas: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 297:

2351–2359

Cross AJ, Ferrucci LM, Risch A, Graubard BI, Ward MH, Park Y,

Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Sinha R (2010) A large prospec-

tive study of meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an

investigation of potential mechanisms underlying this associa-

tion. Cancer Res 70:2406–2414

Doi K, Wanibuchi H, Salim EI, Morimura K, Kinoshita A, Kudoh S,

Hirata K, Yoshikawa J, Fukushima S (2005) Lack of large

intestinal carcinogenicity of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimi-

dazo[4,5-b]pyridine at low doses in rats initiated with azoxyme-

thane. Int J Cancer 115:870–878

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers CD, Parkin D (2010)

GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide:

IARC cancerbase No. 10. Lyon. International Agency for Research

on Cancer, France. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 27 Oct 2011

Fife J, Raniga S, Hider PN, Frizelle FA (2011) Folic acid supple-

mentation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Colorectal

Dis 13:132–137

Fujise T, Iwakiri R, Kakimoto T, Shiraishi R, Sakata Y, Wu B,

Tsunada S, Ootani A, Fujimoto K (2007) Long-term feeding of

various fat diets modulates azoxymethane-induced colon carci-

nogenesis through Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in rats. Am J

Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292:G1150–G1156

Fukushima S, Wanibuchi H, Morimura K, Iwai S, Nakae D, Kishida

H, Tsuda H, Uehara N, Imaida K, Shirai T, Tatematsu M,

Tsukamoto T, Hirose M, Furukawa F (2004) Existence of a

threshold for induction of aberrant crypt foci in the rat colon with

low doses of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine.

Toxicol Sci 80:109–114

Furukawa F, Nishikawa A, Kitahori Y, Tanakamaru Z, Hirose M

(2002) Spontaneous development of aberrant crypt foci in F344

rats. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 21:197–201

Gibson TM, Weinstein SJ, Pfeiffer RM, Hollenbeck AR, Subar AF,

Schatzkin A, Mayne ST, Stolzenberg-Solomon R (2011) Pre-

and postfortification intake of folate and risk of colorectal cancer

in a large prospective cohort study in the United States. Am J

Clin Nutr 94:1053–1062

Hasegawa R, Sano M, Tamano S, Imaida K, Shirai T, Nagao M,

Sugimura T, Ito N (1993) Dose-dependence of 2-amino-1-

methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) carcinogenicity

in rats. Carcinogenesis 14:2553–2557

Issa JP (2004) CpG island methylator phenotype in cancer. Nat Rev

Cancer 4:988–993

Ito N, Hasegawa R, Sano M, Tamano S, Esumi H, Takayama S,

Sugimura T (1991) A new colon and mammary carcinogen in

cooked food, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyri-

dine. Carcinogenesis 12:1503–1506

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011)

Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

Kennedy DA, Stern SJ, Moretti M, Matok I, Sarkar M, Nickel C,

Koren G (2011) Folate intake and the risk of colorectal cancer: a

systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol 35:2–10

Kim Y-I (1999) Will mandatory folic acid fortification prevent or

promote cancer? Am J Clin Nutr 80:1123–1128

Kim Y-I (2003) Role of folate in colon cancer development and

progression. J Nutr 133(Suppl 1):3731S–3739S

Kim Y-I (2004) Folate, colorectal carcinogenesis, and DNA meth-

ylation: lessons from animal studies. Environ Mol Mutagen

44:10–25

Kim Y-I, Salomon RN, Graeme-Cook F, Choi SW, Smith DE, James

SJ, Mason JB (1996) Dietary folate protects against the

development of macroscopic colonic neoplasia in a dose

responsive manner in rats. Gut 39:732–740

Kim D-Y, Chung KH, Lee JH (1998) Stimulatory effects of high-fat

diets on colon cell proliferation depend on the type of dietary fat

and site of the colon. Nutr Cancer 30:118–123

Kuhnel D, Taugner F, Scholtka B, Steinberg P (2009) Inflammation

does not precede or accompany the induction of preneoplastic

lesions in the colon of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]

pyridine-fed rats. Arch Toxicol 83:763–768

Lee JE, Willett WC, Fuchs CS, Smith-Warner SA, Wu K, Ma J,

Giovannucci E (2011) Folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer

and adenoma: modification by time. Am J Clin Nutr 93:817–825

Lindzon G, Medline A, Sohn K-J, Depeint F, Croxford R, Kim Y-I

(2009) Effect of folic acid supplementation on the progression of

colorectal aberrant crypt foci. Carcinogenesis 30:1536–1543

Mason JB, Dickstein A, Jacques PF, Haggarty P, Selhub J, Dallal G,

Rosenberg IH (2007) A temporal association between folic acid

fortification and an increase in colorectal cancer rates may be

illuminating important biological principles: a hypothesis. Can-

cer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16:1325–1329

Nigro ND, Singh DV, Campbell RL, Sook M (1975) Effect of dietary

beef fat on intestinal tumor formation by azoxymethane in rats.

J Natl Cancer Inst 54:439–442

Ochiai M, Nakagama H, Watanabe M, Ishiguro Y, Sugimura T,

Nagao M (1996) Efficient method for rapid induction of aberrant

crypt foci in rats with 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]

pyridine. Jpn J Cancer Res 87:1029–1033

Protiva P, Mason JB, Liu Z, Hopkins ME, Nelson C, Marshall JR,

Lambrecht RW, Pendyala S, Kopelovich L, Kim M, Kleinstein

SH, Laird PW, Lipkin M, Holt PR (2011) Altered folate

availability modifies the molecular environment of the human

colrectum: implications for colorectal carcinogenesis. Cancer

Prev Res 4:530–543

Rao CV, Hirose Y, Indranie C, Reddy BS (2001) Modulation of

experimental colon tumorigenesis by types and amounts of

dietary fatty acids. Cancer Res 61:1927–1933

Reddy BS, Wang CX, Aliaga C, Rao CV, Lubet RA, Steele VE,

Kelloff GJ (1996) Potential chemopreventive activity of perillyl

alcohol and enhancement of experimental colon carcinogenesis

by folic acid and genistein. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res

37:A1849

Rohrmann S, Hermann S, Linseisen J (2009) Heterocyclic aromatic

amine intake increases colorectal adenoma risk: findings from a

prospective European cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 89:1418–1424

Santarelli R, Pierre F, Corpet DE (2008) Processed meat and

colorectal cancer: a review of epidemiologic and experimental

evidence. Nutr Cancer 60:131–144

Scheppach W, Bingham S, Boutron-Ruault MC, Gerhardsson de

Verdier M, Moreno V, Nagengast FM, Reifen R, Riboli E, Seitz

HK, Wahrendorf J (1999) WHO consensus statement on the role

of nutrition in colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 8:57–62

Senate Commission on Food Safety of the German Research

Foundation (1998) Heterocyclic aromatic amines. Opinion dated

14th and 15th December 1998

Shen L, Issa JP (2002) Epigenetics in colorectal cancer. Curr Opin

Gastroenterol 18:68–73

Shin A, Shrubsole MJ, Ness RM, Wu H, Sinha R, Smalley WE, Shyr

Y, Zheng W (2007) Meat and meat-mutagen intake, doneness

preference and the risk of colorectal polyps: the Tennessee

colorectal polyp study. Int J Cancer 121:136–142

Singh J, Hamid R, Reddy BS (1997) Dietary fat and colon cancer:

modulation of cyclooxygenase-2 by types and amount of dietary

fat during the postinitiation stage of colon carcinogenesis.

Cancer Res 57:3465–3470

820 Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821

123

Sinha R, Kulldorff M, Chow WH, Denobile J, Rothman N (2001)

Dietary intake of heterocyclic amines, meat-derived mutagenic

activity, and risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol

Biomarkers Prev 10:559–562

Sinha R, Peters U, Cross AJ, Kulldorff M, Weissfeld JL, Pinsky PF,

Rothman N, Hayes RB (2005) Meat, meat cooking methods and

preservation, and risk for colorectal adenoma. Cancer Res

65:8034–8041

Stevens VL, McCullough ML, Sun J, Jacobs EJ, Campbell PT,

Gapstur SM (2011) High levels of folate from supplements and

fortification are not associated with increased risk of colorectal

cancer. Gastroenterology 141:98–105

Thompson LH, Tucker JD, Stewart SA, Christensen ML, Salazar EP,

Carrano AV, Felton JS (1987) Genotoxicity of compounds from

cooked beef in repair-deficient CHO cells versus Salmonellamutagenicity. Mutagenesis 2:483–487

Thornton WH Jr, MacDonald RS (1997) Dietary fat quantity and

composition induce changes in proliferation and membrane

lipids in rat colon cells. Ann Nutr Metab 41:260–268

Tudek B, Bird RP, Bruce WR (1989) Foci of aberrant crypts in the

colons of mice and rats exposed to carcinogens associated with

foods. Cancer Res 49:1236–1240

Ubagai T, Ochiai M, Kawamori T, Imai H, Sugimura T, Nagao M,

Nakagama H (2002) Efficient induction of rat large intestinal

tumors with a new spectrum of mutations by intermittent

administration of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyr-

idine in combination with a high fat diet. Carcinogenesis

23:197–200

Wallace K, Grau MV, Levine J, Shen L, Hamdan R, Chen X, Gui J,

Haile RW, Barry EL, Ahnen D, McKeown-Eyssen G, Baron JA,

Issa JPJ (2010) Association between folate levels and CpG island

hypermethylation in normal colorectal mucosa. Cancer Prev Res

3:1552–1564

Wargovich MJ, Chen CD, Jimenez A, Steele VE, Velasco M,

Stephens LC, Price R, Gray K, Kelloff GJ (1996) Aberrant crypts

as a biomarker for colon cancer: evaluation of potential

chemopreventive agents in the rat. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark-

ers Prev 5:355–360

Wargovich MJ, Jimenez A, McKee K, Steele VE, Velasco M, Woods

J, Price R, Gray K, Kelloff GJ (2000) Efficacy of potential

chemopreventive agents on rat colon aberrant crypt formation

and progression. Carcinogenesis 21:1149–1155

World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research

(2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of

cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington

Wu WK, Sung JJ, Lee CW, Yu J, Cho CH (2010) Cyclooxygenase-2

in tumorigenesis of gastrointestinal cancers: an update on the

molecular mechanisms. Cancer Lett 295:7–16

Zheng W, Lee SA (2009) Well-done meat intake, heterocyclic amine

exposure, and cancer risk. Nutr Cancer 61:437–446

Arch Toxicol (2012) 86:815–821 821

123