influence of sugars on the infrared spectrum of water...bertie, j. e. & lan, z. (1996), 'infrared...

1
To collect a series of IR spectra of sugar solutions at different concentrations an automated setup was chosen consisting of a 5mL syringe pump, an injection valve, and an ATR flow-through cell in the BRUKER 80v infrared spectrometer. The injected sample plug diffused into the H O carrier stream to create a sugar concentration gradient by the time it reached the flow through cell. The abrupt change of the refractive index of water from n=1.49 at 3160cm to n=1.11 at 3590cm [1] leads in combination with ATR crystals with a refractive index close to that of water (e.g. diamond, n=2.4) to a perceived shift of the water band (anistropic dispersion). To counteract this effect, a Germanium ATR (n=4) was used. With this setup 200g/L solutions of trehalose, maltose and sucrose were analyzed, approximately 400 spectra per run were aquired. 2 -1 -1 HO dest. 2 Ge-ATR syringe pump l i o c g n i d l o h injection valve 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 wavenumber / cm -1 absorbance Diamond ATR 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 0.05 water on Diamond ATR water on Germanium ATR Experimental Setup In this work we investigate the impact of the concentration of sugars in aqueous solutions on the strong and bands of water through Ge-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy using an automated setup. 2DCoS was used to study the changes in the and The investigated sugars were trehalose, maltose and sucrose. Trehalose is of importance in biophysics due its role as cryoprotectant in insects and bacteria. ν ν ν ν bands of water caused by changes of the sugar concentration. 1 3 1 3 Influence of sugars on the infrared spectrum of water Georg Ramer, Christoph Wagner, Bernhard Lendl Intitute of Chemical Technologies andAnalytics, Vienna University of Technology A-1060 Vienna, Austria http://cta.tuwien.ac.at/cavs Due to long measurement times, all spectra were affected by a noticeable baseline drift. This could easily be corrected for by subtracting the last collected spectrum of each series multiplied by a correction factor from all the other spectra in the series. was calculated via a method of least squares fit of the last spectrum to the other spectra in the peakless 1850-1950cm region. Only the spectra between the concentration maximum and the end of each run were used for the calculation of 2DCoS plots. The integral of the strong sugar bands between 1400-800cm (directly proportional to the concentration of the sugar) was used as perturbation [2]. α α -1 -1 Typical Dataset and Data Treatment b. after background correction Sugars cause a shift of waterbands ( , , ) Strong, clear peaks in the asynchonous 2DCoS spectrum of the sugar solutions show, that the changes in the spectra are not simply caused by the displacement of water. At least one additional process is at work. The sequence of these processes is dependent on the sugar used (see asynchronous plots). This is likely caused by the influence of sugars on H-bond network of water [3]. ν ν ν 1 2 3 Results ν 1 / cm -1 ν 2 / cm -1 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 x 10 -7 ν 1 / cm -1 ν 2 / cm -1 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 x 10 -7 ν 1 / cm -1 ν 2 / cm -1 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 x 10 -7 1 / cm -1 2 m c / 1 - 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 x 10 -7 1 / cm -1 2 m c / 1 - 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 x 10 -8 1 / cm -1 2 m c / 1 - 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 x 10 -8 Sucrose Maltose Trehalose [1] ° [2] [3] ù ; Bertie, J. E. & Lan, Z. (1996), 'Infrared intensities of liquids XX: the intensity of the OH stretching band of liquid water revisited, and the best current values of the optical constants of H2O(l) at 25 C between 15,000 and 1 cm-1.', Appl. Spectrosc. 50, 1047-1057. Noda, I. & Ozaki, Y. (2004), Two-dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy -Applications in Vibrational and OpticalSpectroscopy, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Magaz , S. Migliardo, F. & Telling, M. (2008), 'Structural and dynamical properties of water in sugar mixtures', Food Chemistry 106(4), 1460 - 1466. Institute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics Trehalose a. before background correction 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 wavenumber / cm -1 absorbtion H 2 O dest. ( relative to air) 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 trehalose solution H 2 O dest. ν 3 ν 1 ν 2 Do you know what causes this difference? n o i t u l o s e s o l a h e r t f o n o i t b r o s b a ) r e t a w o t e v i t a l e r ( Financial support from Carinthian Tech Research AG and the COMET Competence Center Program of the Austrian Government is gratefully acknowledged.

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • To collect a series of IR spectra of sugarsolutions at different concentrations anautomated setup was chosen consistingof a 5mL syringe pump, an injection valve,and an ATR flow-through cell in theBRUKER 80v infrared spectrometer. Theinjected sample plug diffused into the H Ocarrier stream to create a sugarconcentration gradient by the time itreached the flow through cell.The abrupt change of the refractive indexof water from n=1.49 at 3160cm ton=1.11 at 3590cm [1] leads incombination with ATR crystals with arefractive index close to that of water (e.g.diamond, n=2.4) to a perceived shift of thewater band (anistropic dispersion). Tocounteract this effect, a Germanium ATR(n=4) was used.With this setup 200g/L solutions oftrehalose, maltose and sucrose wereanalyzed, approximately 400 spectraper run were aquired.

    2

    -1

    -1

    H Odest.

    2

    Ge-ATR

    syringepump

    lioc gnidloh

    injection valve

    10001500200025003000350040000

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    wavenumber / cm-1

    abso

    rban

    ce D

    iam

    ond

    ATR

    1000150020002500300035004000

    0

    0.05

    water on Diamond ATRwater on Germanium ATR

    Experimental Setup

    In this work we investigate the impact of the concentration of sugars in aqueous solutions on the strong and bands of water throughGe-ATR-FTIR spectroscopy using an automated setup.2DCoS was used to study the changes in the andThe investigated sugars were trehalose, maltose and sucrose. Trehalose is of importance in biophysics due its role as cryoprotectant ininsects and bacteria.

    ν ν

    ν ν bands of water caused by changes of the sugar concentration.

    1 3

    1 3

    Influence of sugars on theinfrared spectrum of water

    Georg Ramer, Christoph Wagner, Bernhard LendlIntitute of Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Vienna University of TechnologyA-1060 Vienna, Austria http://cta.tuwien.ac.at/cavs

    Due to long measurement times, all spectra were affected by anoticeable baseline drift. This could easily be corrected for bysubtracting the last collected spectrum of each series multiplied by acorrection factor from all the other spectra in the series. wascalculated via a method of least squares fit of the last spectrum to theother spectra in the peakless 1850-1950cm region.Only the spectra between the concentration maximum and the end ofeach run were used for the calculation of 2DCoS plots. The integral ofthe strong sugar bands between 1400-800cm (directly proportional tothe concentration of the sugar) was used as perturbation [2].

    α α

    -1

    -1

    Typical Datasetand Data Treatment

    b. after background correction

    Sugars cause a shift of waterbands ( , , )

    Strong, clear peaks in the asynchonous 2DCoS spectrum of the sugarsolutions show, that the changes in the spectra are not simply causedby the displacement of water. At least one additional process is atwork.

    The sequence of these processes is dependent on the sugar used(see asynchronous plots). This is likely caused by the influence ofsugars on H-bond network of water [3].

    ν ν ν1 2 3

    Results

    ν1 / cm-1

    ν 2/ c

    m-1

    280030003200340036003800

    2800

    3000

    3200

    3400

    3600

    3800-4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    x 10-7

    ν1 / cm-1

    ν 2/ c

    m-1

    280030003200340036003800

    2800

    3000

    3200

    3400

    3600

    3800

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    x 10-7

    ν1 / cm-1

    ν 2/ c

    m-1

    280030003200340036003800

    2800

    3000

    3200

    3400

    3600

    3800

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    x 10-7

    1 / cm-1

    2mc /

    1-

    280030003200340036003800

    2800

    3000

    3200

    3400

    3600

    3800-1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1x 10

    -7

    1 / cm-1

    2mc /

    1-

    280030003200340036003800

    2800

    3000

    3200

    3400

    3600

    3800 -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    x 10-8

    1 / cm-1

    2mc /

    1-

    280030003200340036003800

    2800

    3000

    3200

    3400

    3600

    3800

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    x 10-8

    Sucrose Maltose Trehalose

    [1]°

    [2][3] ù ;

    Bertie, J. E. & Lan, Z. (1996), 'Infrared intensities of liquids XX: the intensity of the OH stretching band of liquid water revisited, and the best current values ofthe optical constants of H2O(l) at 25 C between 15,000 and 1 cm-1.', Appl. Spectrosc. 50, 1047-1057.

    Noda, I. & Ozaki, Y. (2004), Two-dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy - Applications in Vibrational and OpticalSpectroscopy, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Magaz , S. Migliardo, F. & Telling, M. (2008), 'Structural and dynamical properties of water in sugar mixtures', Food Chemistry 106(4), 1460 - 1466.

    Ins t i t u te o f Chemica lTechnologies and Analytics

    Trehalose

    a. before background correction

    1000150020002500300035004000-0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    wavenumber / cm-1

    abso

    rbtio

    n H

    2O d

    est.

    ( rel

    ativ

    e to

    air)

    1000150020002500300035004000-0.005

    0

    0.005

    0.01

    0.015

    0.02

    0.025

    trehalose solutionH2O dest.

    ν3 ν1 ν2

    Do you know what causes this difference?

    noitulos esolahert fo noitbrosba)reta

    w ot evitaler(

    Financial support from Carinthian Tech Research AG and the COMET Competence Center Program of the Austrian Government is gratefully acknowledged.