informal knowledge in e learning
DESCRIPTION
These alides were presented during the 5th Annual Conference on Teaching & Learning: Learning Technologies in Galway.TRANSCRIPT
Copyright 2007 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved.
www.deri.ie
Adapting informal sources of knowledge to e-Learning
Jacek Jankowski, Jaroslaw Dobrzanski, Filip CzajaDigital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
<firstname.lastname>@deri.org
2
Presentation scope
• Motivation
• Formal and Informal learning
• Didaskon project
• IKHarvester project
• Social Semantic Information Sources (SSIS)
• Conclusions
3
Motivation
• Huge amount of information to capture
• Predefined, rigid courses – made once and for all
• Expensive content creation and maintenance
• 80% of possessed knowledge is acquired from informal sources
4
Formal and Informal learning
• Formal learning:– Traditional, old, preparatory approach (i.e. gathering in a
classroom)– Predefined, inflexible courses – made once and for all– Training is PUSHED– Employs advanced and expensive solutions (LMS)
• Informal learning: – More natural, unofficial aproach– Flexible and spontaneous – learn when/where/what you want– Learning is PULLED– Free in most cases
5
Didaskon
DidaskonDidaskon - a framework for automated composition of a learning path for a student
Architecture of the future e-Learning system (our idea presented on LACLO 2006):
• Ontology for user model – delivering personalised content
• Ontology for content - ensuring cooperation of heterogeneous environments which use different formats
6
Didaskon Context
7
Didaskon - Architecture
Didaskon – e-Learning framework, that will be based on existing solutions:
• Users management: FOAFRealm, Windows CardSpace
• Formal Repositories (for learning object’s): LOstRepository
• Informal Repository: IKHarvester• MarcOnt – handling different
formats• UDDI – Didaskon API description
8
IKHarvester - Informal Knowledge Harvester
9
Social Semantic Information Sources (SSIS)
• Compilation of the Semantic Web and Web 2.0– Collaboration– Sharing– Semantic annotations for resources– Interlinking resources and people related to them– Dedicated for people and computers
• Examples:– Semantic wikis: Semantic MediaWiki extension– Semantic blogs: SIOC Plugin for WordPress– JeromeDL – the Social Semantic Digital Library
10
IKHarvester - Goals
• Capturing informal learning/knowledge from SSIS
• Providing data for eLearning frameworks, e.g. Didaskon
11
Data Harvesting
• The Semantic Web– RDF feeds (semantic wikis)– Relation with RDF documents
• Information in HTML
• Non-semantic web pages– HTML of Wikipedia or blogs on Blogger still is quite
semantic – common templates of web pages– HTML scraping
12
Data Providing
• Learning Object Metadata (LOM)– Standard underlying SCORM 2004
• LOM features:– Used in a number of LMSs– Rich description– Many aspects: educational, technical, relations with
other LOs, classification, ...
13
IKHarvester - Architecture
• Service Oriented Architecture ensures:– Encapsulation– Abstraction – hidden logic– Loose coupling - independancy– Quicker reposnses– Reusability - one deployment, many usages
• REST-based Web Services– Popular with Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web– Resource-oriented
14
IKHarvester – API specification
URLHTTP
MethodDescription
http://server/ikh/soa/[type] GETReturns available LOs or LOs of the specified type (type parameter)
http://server/ikh/soa/$URI$/manifest GET Returns LOM for a specified LO
http://server/ikh/soa/$URI$/content GET Returns the content of a specified LO
http://server/ikh/soa/$URI$PUT / POST
Adds/updates LOM for a specified LO
http://server/ikh/soa/$URI$ DELETE Removes LOM for a specified LO
15
Extensibility – support for new types of resources
16
Comparison with existing tools
17
Conclusions
• Features of Didaskon:– Dynamically builds courses for specific user– Uses formal courses described in LOM– Derives from IKHarvester which
• Captures knowledge from informal sources of information (wikis and blogs)
• Exposes harvested data in LOM