innovate educate empower · innovate educate empower annualreport2011 !...

21
Innovate Educate Empower Annual Report 2011 September 1, 2010 — August 31, 2011 MERIT Summer Institute 2011

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

   

   

   

       

Innovate Educate Empower

Annual  Report  2011  September  1,  2010  —  August  31,  2011  

 

MERIT  Summer  Institute  2011  

Page 2: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

 

  ii  

 Krause  Center  for  Innovation  

Annual  Report  2011  September  1,  2010  —  August  31,  2011  

 

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY  

Innovate  –  Educate  –  Empower  Since  2000,  the  Krause  Center  for  Innovation  (KCI)  has  provided  critical  resources  for  

educators,  utilizing  applied  technologies  to  enhance  teaching  and  learning.  The  KCI’s  classes  and  programs  employ  cutting-­‐edge  tools  and  modalities  to  advance  subject  matter  knowledge,  technological  expertise,  and  professional  development  so  that  students  are  more  engaged  and  better  equipped  to  learn.  Its  programs  focus  on  21st-­‐century  learning  skills—creativity  and  innovation,  critical  thinking  and  problem  solving,  communication  and  collaboration—with  the  goal  of  transforming  teaching  practices  and  integrating  technology  into  every  level  of  curriculum.    

 In  2010−11,  the  KCI  designed,  developed,  and  enhanced  a  number  of  programs  and  events  to  

motivate,  challenge,  and  inspire  diverse  learners  and  future  leaders.  Highlights  of  the  year  include:    MERIT  (Making  Education  Relevant  and  Interactive  through  Technology)  The  yearlong,  donor-­‐funded,  technology-­‐focused  education  program  featured  an  intensive  

Summer  Institute  attended  by  48  educators  from  California,  Michigan,  Ireland,  Italy,  and  El  Salvador.  Teacher  participants  were  exposed  to  digital  media  technologies,  online  tools,  and  open  educational  resources  as  potential  classroom  tools,  and  developed  ongoing  collaborative  projects.  Based  on  participant  feedback,  Institute  goals  were  met  or  exceeded.    

 FAME  (Faculty  Academy  for  Mathematics  Excellence)  Thanks  to  philanthropic  support,  KCI  offered  this  professional  development  program  for  middle  

school  mathematics  teachers  for  the  second  year.  Thirty-­‐one  mathematics  teachers  took  part  in  an  intensive  summer  program  designed  to  increase  content  knowledge  and  promote  technology  to  enhance  the  teaching  and  learning  of  mathematics.  Participants  rated  their  teaching  skills  at  99  percent  after  the  summer  session.  

 FASTtech  Classes  Over  800  people  took  FASTtech  courses  throughout  the  2010−11  academic  year.  For  the  first  

time,  the  KCI  launched  an  entire  summer  series  of  FASTtech  classes,  and  more  than  140  teachers,  students,  and  community  members  enrolled.    

 Adobe  Youth  Voices  Training  Center  (AYV)  The  KCI  trained  more  than  370  teachers  to  use  Adobe  software  during  the  final  year  of  its  grant,  

and  more  than  250  educators,  students,  and  community  members  attended  two  Adobe  Days  in  January  and  May.    

 Replication  of  KCI  Programs    A  unique  partnership  between  the  KCI  and  San  Bruno  Park  School  District  resulted  in  the  Tech  

Savvy  Teacher  Program,  which  extends  the  MERIT  program  concept  to  the  Danford  Center  for  

Page 3: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

 

  iii  

Innovation.  Twenty-­‐three  participants  took  part  in  the  first  collaborative  session  in  June,  and  the  goal  is  to  extend  this  outreach  approach  to  other  sites.  

 Educational  Technology  for  Administrative  Leadership  Certificate  For  the  second  year,  this  collaboration  with  the  Silicon  Valley  Education  Foundation  focuses  on  

helping  school  administrators  incorporate  educational  technologies  to  improve  student  outcomes  and  enhance  teacher  effectiveness.    

 Final  Thoughts  Overall  more  than  445  educators  from  27  regional  school  districts  took  part  in  donor  funded  

programs  during  2010−11  year,  with  an  immeasurable  impact  on  well  over  8,675  students  in  elementary,  middle,  and  high  school,  particularly  English  learners,  underrepresented  minorities,  and  from  low-­‐income  families.  The  goal  of  the  KCI  is  to  identify  and  help  educators  incorporate  the  technological  tools  that  will  allow  their  students  to  learn,  thrive,  and  succeed.      

 If  you  have  questions  or  comments  about  the  2010−11  KCI  annual  report,  please  contact  any  

member  of  the  KCI  Leadership  Team:      

Gay  Krause   Steven  McGriff,  Ph.D.   Liane  Freeman  Executive  Director   Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence   Director,  Strategy  and  Marketing  650-­‐949-­‐7113   650-­‐949-­‐7681   650-­‐949-­‐7180  [email protected]   [email protected]   [email protected]  

 

Page 4: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

 

  iv  

TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011  

Executive  Summary   ii  

 

Introduction   1  

Overview  of  Key  KCI  Programs  and  Events   1  

Program  Descriptions  &  Outcomes   1  

MERIT  (Making  Education  Relevant  and  Interactive  through  Technology)   1  

MERIT  2011  Program    

MERIT  2011  Program  Goals  and  Outcomes    

FAME  (Faculty  Academy  for  Mathematics  Excellence)   7  

FAME  2011  Program  Goals  and  Outcomes    

FASTtech  Classes   10  

Adobe  Youth  Voices  Training  Center  (AYV)   10  

Replication  of  KCI  Programs  at  the  Danford  Center,  San  Bruno  Park  School  District   10  

Educational  Technology  for  Administrative  Leadership  Certificate   11  

Microsoft  Innovative  Educator  Forum   12  

Community  Education  Program   12  

 Recognition  of  Innovative  Teachers   12  

KCI  Leadership  Highlights   15  

KCI  Operations   15  

Contact   17  

Page 5: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   1  

 

INTRODUCTION  

Innovate,  Educate,  Empower  The  Krause  Center  for  Innovation  at  Foothill  College  (KCI)  has  served  the  professional  

development  needs  of  K-­‐14  teachers,  administrators,  and  educational  leaders  since  2000.  The  vision  of  the  KCI  is  to  be  the  premier  educational  technology  professional  development  center  for  educators  working  in  every  role  at  any  level.  Through  its  college-­‐level  classes,  training  workshops,  educational  courses,  certificate  programs,  and  special  events,  the  KCI  provides  practical  experience  in  integrating  multimedia,  Web,  audio-­‐visual,  and  computer-­‐based  technologies  into  the  curriculum.  By  applying  its  three  core  values—innovate,  educate,  and  empower—the  KCI  prepares  educators  to  pass  their  enhanced  knowledge  and  abilities  onto  their  students  to  improve  student  engagement  and  learning  outcomes.    

OVERVIEW  OF  KEY  KCI  PROGRAMS  AND  EVENTS  

In  the  report  period  September  1,  2010  −  August  31,  2011,  KCI  used  donations  from  individuals  and  foundations,  along  with  support  from  Foothill  College,  to  design,  develop,  and  implement  the  following  professional  development  programs  and  events:  

  MERIT  (Making  Education  Relevant  and  Interactive  through  Technology)   FAME  (Faculty  Academy  for  Mathematics  Excellence)   FASTtech  classes   Adobe  Youth  Voices  Training  Center  (AYV)   Replication  of  KCI  program  at  the  Danford  Center,  San  Bruno  Park  School  District   Educational  Technology  for  Administrative  Leadership  Certificate   Microsoft  Innovative  Educator  Forum   Community  Education  program  

PROGRAM  DESCRIPTIONS  &  OUTCOMES  

MERIT  (Making  Education  Relevant  and  Interactive  through  Technology)  “This  has  been  the  best  professional  development  I've  attended.  I  am  a  different  educator  now  than  when  I  started  two  weeks  ago.  Thank  you  to  all  of  those  who  made  this  possible.”      MERIT  is  the  KCI’s  premier  research-­‐based,  educator  development  program.  It  is  designed  

to  help  teachers  bolster  their  curriculum  with  technology-­‐enhanced  learning  activities  to  motivate,  challenge,  and  inspire  diverse  learners  and  future  leaders. The  MERIT  program  uses  qualitative  and  quantitative  measures  to  determine  if  a  well-­‐trained  teacher  using  engaging  technology  can  improve  student  learning.  Participants  have  the  opportunity  to  learn  to  use  and  contribute  to  a  variety  of  resources  for  collaboration  and  are  required  to  design  projects  that  not  only  provide  dynamic  learning  experiences  for  their  students  but  also  create  resources  that  will  be  of  value  to  other  teachers  and  students  near  and  far.  MERIT  is  a  year-­‐long  program  that  starts  each  spring  quarter,  includes  a  two-­‐week  intensive  summer  institute,  and  continues  with  follow-­‐up  classes  in  the  fall  and  winter  quarters.      

Page 6: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   2  

 

MERIT  2011  Program    “Thank  you  for  giving  me  the  confidence  that  I  can  use  technology  in  my  class  and  at  my  school.”    MERIT  2011  is  designed  to  create  a  technology-­‐focused  professional  development  

experience  for  educators  to  transform  teaching  and  learning  in  the  classroom  and  school  site.  The  two-­‐week  intensive  Summer  Institute  was  held  July  18–29  on  the  Foothill  campus.  

 The  MERIT  2011  cohort  comprises  48  teachers:  43  from  California,  one  from  Michigan,  and  

four  international  teachers  (two  from  Italy,  one  from  Ireland,  and  one  from  El  Salvador).  The  data  in  this  report  is  based  on  the  California  teachers  only  (43).      

MERIT  Teachers  by  Grade  Level    9   High  School  

14   Middle  School  17   Elementary  School  3   Other  

43   Total        

 Frequency  of  Middle  and  High  School  Subject  Areas  Taught  by  MERIT  Teachers  

7   English  1   Library  Science  5   Math  7   Science  7   Social  Studies  1   Technology  2   World  Languages  

         

   

MERIT  Teachers  by  County  22   Santa  Clara  10   San  Mateo  7   Alameda  1   San  Francisco  3   Other  

43   Total        

 

“This  was  the  best  use  of  my  professional  development  time  ever.  I  am  feeling  reinvented,  renewed,  and  ready  to  do  something  different.”  

 

   

Number  of  MERIT  Teachers  Participating  as  a  Team  from  Same  School  Site     School   District  

3   Garden  Gate  Elementary   Cupertino  Union  3   Peterson  Middle  School   Santa  Clara  Unified  2   Junipero  Serra  High  School   Archdiocese  of  San  Francisco  2   Sedgwick  Elementary   Cupertino  Union  2   Fallon  Middle  School   Dublin  Unified  2   Easterbrook  Discovery   Moreland  2   Graham  Middle  School   Mountain  View−Whisman  2     Jordan  Middle  School   Palo  Alto  Unified  2   El  Crystal  Elementary   San  Bruno  Park  2   Burlingame  High  School   San  Mateo  Union  2   Hillsdale  High  School   San  Mateo  Union  2   Creekside  Elementary   San  Ramon  Valley  

     

 

Page 7: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   3  

 

Beyond  Borders:  MERIT  Reaches  Teachers  Outside  California  Expanding  the  geographic  reach  of  the  KCI  allows  the  primary  audience  of  California  

teachers  to  see  what  teaching  and  learning  looks  like  in  a  global  context.  Last  year  was  the  first  time  MERIT  selected  teachers  outside  Silicon  Valley  to  participate.  This  year,  five  non-­‐California  teachers  joined  MERIT  2011:  one  high  school  teacher  from  Byron  Center,  Michigan;  one  middle  

school  and  one  high  school  teacher  from  Milano,  Italy;  a  college  professor  from  Limerick,  Ireland;  and  one  elementary  teacher  from  San  Salvador,  El  Salvador.  The  mix  of  international  teachers  has  generated  plans  for  activities  that  will  have  students  in  Silicon  Valley  working  with  their  peers  around  the  world.  The  non-­‐California  teachers  provided  their  own  financial  support  to  participate  in  MERIT  and  were  not  awarded  college  credit  or  stipends  paid  by  donations  to  the  KCI.  

 

MERIT  2011  Program  Goals  and  Outcomes  “You  have  really  transformed  how  I  think  about  education.  I  want  to  find  a  way  to  weave  tech  into  the  heart  of  my  entire  into  my  curriculum  ...  one  step  at  a  time.”    MERIT  teachers  are  responsible  for  producing  multiple  projects  to  ensure  that  what  they  

learn  is  integrated  into  their  curriculum  planning  and  courses  throughout  the  school  year.  Teachers  are  required  to  report  on  their  progress  and  continue  to  receive  feedback  from  KCI  instructors,  peers,  and  even  students  on  how  to  continue  to  improve.  The  MERIT  leadership  team  provides  explicit  training  on  how  teachers  can  share  their  new  expertise  with  colleagues  at  their  schools,  districts,  and  conferences.    

 The  MERIT  2011  goals  are  listed  below  followed  by  a  brief  analysis  of  the  results  of  

evaluation  data  collected  from  46  of  the  48  participants  before  and  after  the  Summer  Institute.    

Goal  1.   Integrate  technology  into  the  learning  environment  that  enhances  student  engagement  

One  key  measure  of  the  MERIT  Summer  Institute’s  success  is  the  confidence  level  of  the  participants  to  choose  and  use  technology  in  the  classroom.  The  post-­‐Institute  survey  indicates  that  teachers  feel  they  are  better  able  to  integrate  technology  into  the  learning  environment.  Participants  were  asked  to  rate  statements  about  their  knowledge  or  ability  to  use  educational  technology  before  and  after  the  Summer  Institute  using  a  5-­‐degree  scale  from  “strongly  disagree”  to  “strongly  agree.”    

 Among  the  many  survey  items,  the  two  following  

statements  elicited  very  positive  responses:     I  know  how  to  choose  technologies  that  

enhance  the  teaching  approaches  for  a  lesson  or  unit  of  study  

I  can  choose  technologies  that  enhance  student  learning  for  a  lesson  or  unit  of  study  

 The  results  show  a  22  percentage  point  positive  

Page 8: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   4  

 

change:  42  percent  chose  “neutral”  before  the  Summer  Institute  and  64  percent  chose  “strongly  agree”  after  the  Summer  Institute.  In  addition,  100  percent  of  the  participants  chose  either  “agree”  or  “strongly  agree”  to  the  statements  after  completing  the  Summer  Institute.  

 Participants  were  also  asked  to  share  their  comments  about  their  Summer  Institute  

experiences  using  digital  media—a  new  technology  for  the  vast  majority.      

“Now  that  I've  done  it,  I  plan  to  incorporate  more  videos—both  with  students  teaching  or  demonstrating  their  knowledge,  and  with  me  providing  additional  instruction  or  documenting  classroom  events.”    “I  was  absolutely  terrified  of  making  a  video.  I  NEVER  would  have  attempted  to  make  one  or  use  them  for  my  classroom  before  but  having  to  do  the  90-­second  video  showed  me  that  not  only  is  it  possible,  it  is  an  AWESOME  learning/teaching  tool.”    “MERIT  has  encouraged  me  to  let  the  

students  explore  even  though  I  am  not  an  expert  in  the  use  of  each  tool.”    

These  responses  illustrate  the  high  level  of  interest  in  integrating  video  as  a  new  tool  for  teaching  and  learning  that  encouraged  by  MERIT  participation.  

 Another  survey  question  asked,  What  are  one  or  two  ideas  you  learned  from  the  MERIT  

Summer  Institute  that  you  feel  you  will  most  likely  apply  or  use  in  the  next  school  year?  The  following  responses  are  typical:    

 “Using  collaboration  tools  to  augment  student  learning.  More  emphasis  on  video  as  a  tool  to  support  learning.”    “I  think  the  main  idea  I  am  taking  away  is  the  overall  use  of  technology  and  thinking  about  ways  to  make  some  of  the  everyday  things  more  interesting  and  easy  through  technology.  I'm  excited  to  try  more  Google  tools  and  change  the  workflow  in  the  classroom  and  work  on  some  more  online  discussion  practices  with  my  students.”    Goal  2.   Create  technology-­‐enriched,  student-­‐centered  learning  projects  that  improve  

learning  outcomes  Video  making  was  a  novel  technology  for  the  majority  of  MERIT  participants,  who  each  

received  a  Flip  MinoHD  video  camera  to  create  projects  as  part  of  the  professional  development  curriculum.  They  were  encouraged  to  create  a  project  for  their  students  using  video  as  part  of  the  lesson.  In  response  to  the  post-­‐Institute  survey  question,  Can  you  think  of  several  activities,  lessons,  or  units  where  students  could  use  video  devices  to  enhance  learning?    81  percent  strongly  agreed  and  17  percent  agreed  with  the  statement.    

Page 9: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   5  

 

MERIT  participants  will  continue  to  develop  student-­‐centered  learning  projects  throughout  the  academic  year  in  order  to  complete  the  program  requirements.  Updates  on  their  projects  will  be  documented  in  the  mid-­‐year  report.    

Goal  3.   Evaluate  the  effectiveness  of  educational  technology  projects  on  teaching  practice  and  learning  outcomes  

Data  will  be  collected  over  the  duration  of  the  yearlong  MERIT  program  as  the  teachers  implement  their  projects  and  will  be  included  in  the  mid-­‐year  report.    

Goal  4.   Analyze  the  efficacy  of  innovative  technologies,  such  as  open  educational  resources  and  emerging  technologies,  for  teaching  and  learning  

Evidence  of  achieving  this  goal  is  derived  from  the  survey  question,  What  are  one  or  two  ideas  you  learned  from  the  MERIT  Summer  Institute  that  you  feel  you  will  most  likely  apply  or  use  in  the  next  school  year?  Responses  clearly  indicate  a  high  comfort  level  in  using  open  education  resources  (OERs):    

“OERs!  This  is  the  solution  to  hardware/software  problems  between  home  and  school.  Don't  have  iMovie  or  Keynote?  Forgot  your  USB?  We  can  edit  the  video  online.  Or  create  things  IN  THE  CLOUD!  This  solves  many  problems,  and  I  love  how  much  the  arts  are  infused  into  these  online  tools—colors,  backgrounds,  design  elements,  music,  and  singing.  I  love  it!”    “The  program  makes  these  digital  tools  accessible  to  me.  They  are  mostly  free  tools,  and  I  don't  have  to  be  an  expert  to  start  using  them.”  

 Critical  thinking  is  essential  to  effectively  analyze,  select,  and  use  open  educational  

resources.  When  participants  were  asked  to  rate  their  ability  to  think  critically  about  how  to  use  technology  in  the  classroom,  the  majority  of  responses  rated  critical  thinking  ability  as  either  “neutral”  (40  percent)  or  “agree”  (43  percent)  before  the  Summer  Institute.  After  the  Institute  the  responses  shifted  up  the  scale  approximately  one  level  to  32  percent  “agree”  and  68  percent  “strongly  agree.”    

Goal  5.   Foster  collaboration  within  the  MERIT  cohort,  the  teacher’s  school  site,  and  other  academic  venues  in  the  nation  and  world  

Participants  and  instructors  used  a  social  collaboration  website  created  using  the  Ning  platform  to  chat,  blog,  post,  respond,  download,  and  share  resources  to  build  a  strong  professional  learning  network  beyond  the  borders  of  their  school  sites.  Building  this  network  within  Ning  allows  participants  to  continue  direct  dialogue  and  to  share  resources  with  one  another  after  MERIT.  The  majority  of  respondents  rated  the  quality  of  the  Ning  resource  as  “very  good”  (49  percent)  or  “excellent”  (38  percent).    

 In  terms  of  helping  other  teachers  within  their  school  site  or  district  to  combine  content,  

technologies,  and  teaching  approaches,  most  (53  percent)  rated  their  ability  before  MERIT  as  “neutral”  or  lower.  The  responses  after  the  Summer  Institute  show  significant  positive  change,  

Page 10: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   6  

 

in  which  32  percent  “agree”  and  64  percent  “strongly  agree”  that  they  possess  the  ability  to  help  their  peers.  

 Further  evidence  of  achieving  this  goal  is  derived  from  participant  responses  to  the  survey  

question,  What  did  you  like  most  about  the  MERIT  Summer  Institute?    

“The  ability  to  collaborate  with  peers.  Have  them  give  me  feedback  on  how  to  improve  my  project.  They  also  helped  me  troubleshoot.  I  really  feel  like  I  have  made  some  great  contacts  that  will  continue  throughout  the  year.”    “The  collaboration  with  others.  I  made  some  great  friends  here  at  MERIT,  and  it’s  wonderful  to  have  a  group  of  people  to  call  on  when  I  get  stuck  or  need  inspiration  or  just  encouragement.”    “Working  in  grade-­level  groups  was  extremely  helpful  both  for  information  and  connecting  with  my  tribe.”    “Collaboration.  I'm  now  highly  motivated  to  teach  in  a  new  way,  influenced  much  by  technology.”    

MERIT  is  a  yearlong  program  that  includes  ongoing  professional  development  beyond  the  Summer  Institute  through  the  academic  year.  Teacher  participants  will  continue  to  develop  their  skills  while  creating  student-­‐centered  classroom  projects  that  use  digital  media.  For  example,  five  MERIT  Teachers  from  the  previous  cohort  (MERIT  2010)  presented  seven  sessions  at  a  local  teacher  professional  development  conference,  Silicon  Valley  Computer  Using  Educators  (SVCUE),  in  March.  Those  presentations  comprised  one-­‐fourth  of  all  presentations  at  SVCUE  and  are  further  evidence  of  the  MERIT  program’s  success  and  ability  to  spread  the  ideas  and  techniques  of  MERIT  beyond  the  program  participants.  Continuing  the  professional  development  theme  during  the  Summer  Institute,  five  MERIT  2010  graduates  returned  to  present  the  classroom  projects  they  had  implemented  in  the  academic  year  in  order  to  inspire  and  encourage  the  current  cohort  to  see  themselves  as  teacher  leaders.  

Page 11: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   7  

 

 

FAME  (Faculty  Academy  for  Mathematics  Excellence)  The  Faculty  Academy  for  Mathematics  

Excellence  (FAME)  is  a  yearlong  professional  development  program  for  middle  school  mathematics  teachers  designed  to  increase  student  achievement  in  pre-­‐algebra  and  algebra  courses,  reduce  the  achievement  gap,  and  promote  the  use  of  technology  to  enhance  the  teaching  and  learning  of  mathematics.  Teachers  are  recruited  from  San  Mateo  and  Santa  Clara  county  schools  with  significant  numbers  of  English  language  learners  (ELL)  and  low-­‐income  families  to  help  their  students  be  better  prepared  to  take  algebra  in  the  eighth  or  ninth  grade.    

 FAME  2011  is  the  second  time  the  KCI  has  

presented  this  program,  thanks  to  a  generous  grant  from  the  Silicon  Valley  Community  Foundation  and  support  from  private  family  foundations.  The  FAME  Leadership  Team  is  made  up  of  Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence  Steven  McGriff,  Ph.D.;  KCI  Executive  Director  Gay  Krause;  and  an  instructional  team  led  by  Jivan  Dhaliwal  and  Melissa  Christie,  math  program  coordinators  from  the  Santa  Clara  County  Office  of  Education,  Steve  Matusow,  professor  emeritus  of  mathematics  at  Evergreen  Valley  College,  and  Joe  Chee,  a  KCI  instructor.    

 The  FAME  instructional  team  selected  31  mathematics  teachers  to  participate  in  the  two-­‐

week,  intensive  summer  professional  development  program  in  July.  FAME  was  designed  to  deepen  teacher  participants’  math  knowledge,  expand  their  repertoire  of  mathematics  instruction  strategies,  and  help  them  integrate  technology  into  their  teaching  practice.  Topics  included  how  to  use  computer  and  Internet  technologies  (e.g.,  GeoGebra,  spreadsheet  software,  and  virtual  manipulatives)  to  support  the  challenging  math  topics  covered  in  the  program.  In  the  2011−12  academic  year,  FAME  will  include  four  follow-­‐up  sessions  to  support  the  teachers  as  they  implement  new  math  teaching  strategies.  

 FAME  2011  included  teachers  representing  school  districts  in  Santa  Clara  and  San  Mateo  

counties  with  high  populations  of  students  who  are  underrepresented  in  college  math  courses.      

 

FAME  Teachers  by  County  25   Santa  Clara  6   San  Mateo  31   Total      

 

 

Number  of  Teacher  Teams  from  Same  School  Site     School   District  4   Morrill  Middle  School   Berryessa  Union  3   Monroe  Middle  School   Campbell  Union  3   LeyVa  Middle  School   Evergreen  3   Bernal  Intermediate   Oak  Grove  3   Orchard  Elementary   Orchard  2   Abbott  Middle  School   San  Mateo−Foster  City  

   

Page 12: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   8  

 

FAME  2011  Program  Goals  and  Outcomes  

Goal  1.     To  increase  teachers’  content  knowledge  and  teaching  skills  in  key  pre-­‐algebra  and  algebra  concepts,  such  as  proportional  reasoning,  linear  relationships,  functions  and  graphs,  and  problem  solving  

Responses  in  the  post-­‐Summer  Institute  survey  show  positive  change  in  teachers’  self-­‐reported  confidence  level  for  adapting  mathematics  instruction  based  upon  student  understanding.  The  majority  of  teachers  (55  percent)  reported  a  moderate  degree  of  adaptability  and  12  percent  reported  a  strong  degree  before  the  Institute  training.  Afterwards,  64  percent  reported  a  strong  degree  of  adaptability  and  33  percent  a  moderate  degree.  

 One  FAME  participant  described  new  

strategies  to  help  motivate  students  to  succeed  in  math:    

“I  believe  these  tools  were  the  most  beneficial  for  me  and  ones  that  I  think  will  be  most  beneficial  for  students:  algebra  tiles,  percent  strips,  fraction  tiles,  area  models  for  multiplication.  Sharing  and  using  the  virtual  manipulatives,  Excel,  and  GeoGebra  would  all  help  motivate  students  as  well.”    Goal  2.   Promote  and  encourage  the  use  of  technology  in  instruction  to  support  and  

enhance  mathematics  teaching  and  learning  Based  on  self-­‐reported,  post-­‐Summer  Institute  data,  participants  greatly  increased  their  

skill  in  using  spreadsheet  applications,  GeoGebra,  and  virtual  manipulatives.  Teachers  expressed  greater  confidence  and  knowledge  about  how  to  integrate  technology  into  math  instruction.  

 A  FAME  participant  wrote,    “All  of  the  technology  parts  will  be  brand  new  for  my  students,  and  it  will  all  work  in  some  form—I  just  need  to  play  with  them  first.  The  arrays  are  my  new  best  friend.  I  will  use  more  pictures  and  visuals.”   Another  FAME  teacher  wrote,    “I  liked  the  Internet  resources  provided,  such  as  the  places  to  find  rich  problems,  virtual  manipulatives,  and  other  non-­Internet  manipulatives.”      

Page 13: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   9  

 

 Goal  3.   Increase  the  use  of  technology  for  visualization  and  multiple  representations  

of  pre-­‐algebra  and  algebra  concepts  The  FAME  Summer  Institute  used  a  number  of  visualization  technologies  and  multiple  

representations  of  mathematical  concepts  as  models  to  emulate  in  the  classroom.    A  FAME  teacher  provided  the  feedback  that    “FAME  has  reinforced  the  importance  of  making  math  conceptual  for  students  and  that  technology  is  an  important  part  of  our  students’  lives  that  they  need  to  be  skilled  in.”    Another  FAME  teacher  described  a  favorite  aspect  

of  the  Summer  Institute  as    “…using  a  document  camera  and  using  the  math  manipulatives.”    Goal  4.   Guide  teachers  to  make  connections  between  school  mathematics,  the  

California  Mathematics  Content  Standards,  the  California  Common  Core  State  Standards,  and  the  ELD  standards  

The  FAME  program  will  continue  to  collect  data  on  this  goal  and  analyze  the  ability  of  teacher  participants  to  connect  the  standards  with  their  own  curriculum.  Results  will  be  reported  in  the  mid-­‐year  annual  report.  

 Goal  5.   Enable  teachers  to  utilize  effective  mathematical  instructional  strategies  to  

meet  the  needs  of  all  students  Based  on  self-­‐report  data,  the  great  majority  of  teachers  (91  percent)  initially  indicated  

their  ability  to  use  a  variety  of  mathematics  teaching  approaches  in  a  classroom  setting  as  weak-­‐to-­‐moderate.  Following  FAME,  99  percent  indicated  their  ability  as  strong  to  very  strong.  

 Based  on  qualitative  data  and  

observations,  teacher  participants  better  understood  the  importance  of  developing  students’  understanding  of  mathematical  ideas.  They  increased  their  skill  and  knowledge  of  using  mathematically  rich  problems  in  instruction.  

 

Page 14: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   10  

 

 

FASTtech  Classes  FASTtech  classes  are  Foothill  College  courses  designed  and  developed  by  the  KCI  to  meet  

the  technology  training  needs  of  the  general  local  community,  but  more  specifically  those  of  elementary,  middle,  secondary,  and  community  college  educators.  FASTtech  classes  feature  a  series  of  short,  affordable,  and  conveniently  timed  courses  for  K-­‐14  educators  that  address  the  California  Technology  Proficiencies  and  provide  teachers  with  an  opportunity  to  discover  ways  to  incorporate  technology  into  their  curriculum.  Course  topics  include  Google  applications,  Adobe  applications,  blogs  and  wikis,  websites,  ePortfolios,  21st-­‐century  teaching  and  learning,  and  general  integration  strategies.    

 Nearly  800  people  took  FASTtech  courses  throughout  the  2010−11  academic  year.  For  the  

first  time,  the  KCI  launched  an  entire  summer  series  of  FASTtech  classes,  and  more  than  140  teachers,  students,  and  community  members  enrolled.    

 

Adobe  Youth  Voices  Training  Center  (AYV)  The  KCI  completed  its  grant  with  Adobe  as  an  AYV  teacher  training  center  in  June.  The  goal  

of  the  program  was  to  train  teachers  of  underserved  youth  to  create  an  educational  venue  for  creative  expression  while  improving  students’  technology  literacy  and  academic  achievement.  During  the  2010−11  grant  period,  the  KCI  trained  more  than  370  teachers  to  use  Adobe  software  to  implement  meaningful  projects  with  their  students.    

Adobe  Day  at  the  KCI  To  further  expand  the  partnership  between  the  KCI  and  Adobe,  and  to  provide  additional  

opportunities  to  potential  users,  the  KCI  hosted  two  Adobe  Days  in  January  and  May.  More  than  250  educators,  students,  and  community  members  attended  sessions  given  by  Adobe  engineers  that  focused  on  the  features  and  functionality  of  the  latest  Adobe  products.  The  trainers  were  able  to  address  audience  skill  levels  that  ranged  from  novice  to  advanced.  Using  Adobe  Contribute,  the  KCI  was  able  to  set  up  overflow  rooms  for  additional  participants  to  watch  the  presentations  live.  One  attendee  described  the  day  as  “compelling  and  mind-­expanding!”  Another  participant  wrote,  “I  have  been  anxious  to  learn  more  about  desktop  publishing,  and  now  that  I  have  seen  what  [Adobe]  InDesign  can  do,  I'm  really  excited  about  using  it.  I  can't  wait  to  take  the  InDesign  class  that  I  signed  up  for!”    

Replication  of  KCI  Programs  at  the  Danford  Center,  San  Bruno  Park  School  District  The  KCI  and  the  San  Bruno  Park  School  District  created  a  partnership  at  the  beginning  of  

the  2010−11  school  year  to  replicate  a  MERIT-­‐like  program  at  the  new  Danford  Center  for  Innovation.  The  Tech  Savvy  Teacher  Program  is  the  first  project  of  this  partnership.  Steven  McGriff,  Ph.D.,  Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence  at  the  KCI,  worked  closely  with  Skip  Johnson,  principal  of  El  Crystal  Elementary  School,  who  originally  inspired  this  collaborative  program.  

 The  Tech  Savvy  Teacher  Program  began  in  June  with  23  participants  and  will  conclude  

November.  The  goal  is  to  prepare  teachers  to  implement  21st-­‐century  technology  skills  into  daily  instructional  practice  through  an  intensive  process  of  learning  how  to  implement  interactive  whiteboards,  document  cameras,  related  software,  and  a  LCD  projector.  Those  who  complete  the  program  will  earn  six  units  of  college  credit  and  a  certificate.  

 

Page 15: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   11  

 

The  San  Bruno  Park  School  District  has  invested  more  than  $100,000  in  equipment  for  the  graduates  of  this  program.  KCI  instructors  Chris  Heumann  and  Gayle  Britt  are  teaching  the  courses  and  guiding  the  San  Bruno  Park  teachers  through  technology  integration.  This  approach  to  replication—the  network  model—reflects  a  fundamental  direction  of  the  KCI,  which  seeks  to  encourage  qualified  organizations  to  host  programs  at  their  own  facilities  and  to  enable  our  instructional  team  to  help  shape  a  curriculum  based  on  the  partner’s  needs.  Ultimately  the  goal  is  to  have  the  newly  trained  teachers  take  on  the  broader  role  of  training  their  colleagues  within  the  district.    

 A  summary  of  the  Tech  Savvy  Teacher  participants’  responses  to  a  survey  completed  at  the  

start  of  the  program  follows:     45%  identified  their  technology  use  as  “developing”  and  50%  as  “proficient”  on  a  four-­‐

item  scale  of  early,  developing,  proficient,  and  advanced  categories.   The  majority  of  respondents  agree  that  teaching  21st  century  skills  is  important.   The  majority  of  respondents  have  designed  lessons  that  include  digital  learning  tools.   The  three  most  significant  obstacles  to  integrating  digital  daily  are  time,  class  size,  and  

teacher  training.   41%  of  teachers  had  up  to  8  hours  of  professional  development  within  their  district  in  

the  past  12  months  and  36%  reported  they  had  no  district  training.   27%  of  teachers  had  up  to  8  hours  of  professional  development  outside  their  district  in  

the  past  12  months  and  50%  reported  they  had  no  outside  training.   The  most  often  repeated  themes  to  the  open-­‐ended  question,    

“what  would  you  like  to  learn  most…,”  are  epitomized  by  the  following  quotes:  “…ways  to  actually  get  kids  using  technology  to  improve  confidence  and  intelligence.”  

“I  would  like  to  be  able  to  provide  interactive  opportunities  to  my  students  to  enhance  learning,  skill  building,  with  the  ultimate  goal  to  increase  student  productivity  and  test  scores.”  

“How  to  incorporate  technology  more  frequently  in  my  lessons,  and  specifically,  how  to  use  the  tools  that  will  be  installed  in  my  classroom.”  

More  results  of  the  FAME  2011  program  will  be  published  in  the  KCI  mid-­‐year  report.    

Educational  Technology  for  Administrative  Leadership  Certificate  The  KCI  continues  to  develop  Educational  Technology  for  Administrative  Leadership  in  

collaboration  with  the  Silicon  Valley  Education  Foundation  (SVEF),  a  six-­‐unit  certificate  program  that  was  initiated  in  fall  2010.  The  goal  is  to  prepare  school  leaders  (i.e.,  lead  teachers,  principals,  directors  of  curriculum,  district  administrators,  superintendents)  to  guide  their  school  or  district  to  improving  student  learning  through  strategic  application  of  educational  technologies.  

 

Page 16: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   12  

 

KCI  Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence  Steven  McGriff,  Ph.D.,  in  collaboration  with  Michael  Simkins,  Ed.D.,  of  the  SVEF  developed  and  led  courses  for  local  school  administrators  who  want  to  be  on  the  forefront  of  emerging  educational  technologies.  The  program  is  designed  for  educational  leaders  who  want  to  be  more  efficient  and  effective  in  using  technology  tools  to:  

improve  their  workflow;   implement  effective  educational  technologies  that  improve  student  success;   enhance  teacher  effectiveness  with  integrating  technology  in  instruction;   create  school  conditions  that  support  the  effective  use  of  technology  in  instruction.    

 This  certificate  program  marked  a  new  direction  for  the  KCI,  which  has  traditionally  offered  

professional  development  courses  targeted  to  teachers.  The  first  year  of  the  program  served  as  a  useful  pilot,  providing  feedback  on  how  to  modify  and  improve  the  program.  A  number  of  administrators  from  throughout  the  Bay  Area  have  volunteered  to  work  on  and  teach  the  next  series  of  program  courses.  In  the  coming  year,  the  development  team  will  focus  on  refining  the  program  based  on  the  pilot  experience.  

 

Microsoft  Innovative  Educator  Forum  The  KCI  seeks  to  recognize  outstanding  achievements  of  teachers  in  the  Silicon  Valley.  In  a  

unique  partnership  with  the  Silicon  Valley  Education  Foundation,  the  KCI  was  able  to  coordinate  the  selection  of  three  local  teachers  to  present  their  innovative  education  projects  at  the  national  Microsoft  Innovative  Educator  Forum  held  in  Redmond,  Washington,  in  July.  The  three  outstanding  teachers  were:    

Corinne  Takara  of  Horace  Cureton  Elementary  school  in  San  Jose,  presented  “You  are  Here,”  a  street  banner  design  project  with  fifth-­‐grade  students;    

Angela  Sveda  of  Ralston  Middle  School  in  Belmont,  who  created  the  project  ECOPoetry;  

Meg  Omainsky  of  Gunn  High  School  in  Palo  Alto,  presented  STEM  Slam,  a  showcase  of  videos  produced  by  students  to  show  their  knowledge  of  science,  technology,  engineering,  or  math  (STEM)  concepts.    

Community  Education  Program  This  year  the  KCI  formed  a  partnership  with  the  Foothill–De  

Anza  Community  College  District’s  Community  Education  organization.  Community  Education  offers  short,  non-­‐credit  courses  that  are  fee  based  and  do  not  require  participants  to  enroll  in  the  college.  These  courses  are  advertised  primarily  in  Santa  Clara  County.  The  KCI  has  scheduled  courses  on  topics  using  Adobe  software,  Google  applications,  and  video  production  that  have  a  broad  audience  appeal  for  the  fall  quarter  as  a  pilot  to  determine  whether  this  is  a  good  approach  to  create  a  revenue  stream  for  the  KCI.  Revenue  from  this  effort  will  go  to  support  KCI  staffing.  

RECOGNITION  OF  INNOVATIVE  TEACHERS    

One  of  the  goals  of  KCI  programs  is  to  encourage  teacher  participants  to  broaden  their  influence  beyond  their  immediate  classrooms  and  to  have  a  wider  impact  on  their  schools,  districts,  and  

Meg  Omainsky  and  Corinne  Takara  at  the  Microsoft  IEF  Event  

Page 17: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   13  

 

beyond.  Participants  are  up  to  the  challenge,  and  their  achievements  over  the  last  year  are  impressive.  

Three  MERIT  graduates—Corrine  Takara,  Meg  Omainsky,  and  Angela  Sveda—were  selected  to  represent  Silicon  Valley  at  the  Innovative  Education  Forum,  a  national  competition  sponsored  by  the  Microsoft  Corporation  (see  section  above).  

Meg  Omainsky  (Librarian,  Gunn  High  School,  Palo  Alto)  was  one  of  five  winners  at  the  annual  STEMposium,  which  is  sponsored  by  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  for  her  project  STEM  Slam.  

Due  to  the  effort  of  MERIT  graduate  Cindy  Ginther  (Math  Teacher)  to  implement  innovative  methods  of  teaching  math,  Valley  Christian  Junior  High  School  was  awarded  the  Intel  School  of  Distinction  Star  Innovator  Award  2011  and  the  Intel  School  of  Distinction  Middle  School  Mathematics  Award  2011.  

Nicole  Dalesio    (5th  Grade  Teacher,  Fairlands  Elementary  School,  Pleasanton)  was  named  a  member  of  the  2011  cohort  for  the  Apple  Distinguished  Educator  team,  a  program  that  occurs  once  every  two  years.  

Joe  Donahue  (Math  Teacher,  Santa  Ynez  Middle  School,  Santa  Ynez)  was  selected  as  one  of  the  new  Google  Certified  Teachers  for  the  April  2011  Google  Teacher  Academy  in  Sydney,  Australia.  

Lisa  Highfill  (5th  Grade  Teacher,  Fairlands  Elementary  School,  Pleasanton)  won  an  award  at  the  California  Student  Media  Festival  for  her  class  project,  Outdoor  Education  at  Pigeon  Point  Lighthouse.  

NUMBER  OF  PARTICIPANTS  SERVED    

The  table  below  shows  the  number  of  educators  who  participated  in  the  primary  KCI  programs  in  2010-­‐11  and  the  number  of  students  these  educators  could  affect  in  the  2011-­‐12  school  year.  

 Estimated  Number  of  Students  Affected  by  KCI  Teacher  Participants    

Total  applicants  

Enrollments  or  participants  accepted  into  program  

Estimated1  numbers  of  students  taught  by  participant  educators  in    2011-­‐12  

MERIT     130     43     3,875  FAME     40     32     4,800  FASTtech  classes       n/a     866     Unknown†     Adobe  Youth  Voices*     n/a      370*     Unknown†  Totals     170     941     8,675    

TABLE  NOTES:  1.  Total  estimates  for  students  who  are  affected  by  a  program  participant-­‐teacher  are  based  on  the  average  number  of  students  taught  per  teacher  by  grade  levels  per  year:     Elementary  K−5  (25),  Middle  school  6−8  (150),  High  school  (150)    †  Estimates  of  students  affected  by  Adobe  Youth  Voices  and  FASTtech  classes  are  unknown  because  the  number  of  teachers  and  the  grade  levels  taught  are  not  tracked.  *  Adobe  Youth  Voices  classes  are  a  subset  of  enrollments  included  in  the  total  for  FASTtech  classes.    

Page 18: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   14  

 

CALIFORNIA  PUBLIC  SCHOOL  DISTRICTS  REPRESENTED  BY  SELECTED  PROGRAM  PARTICIPANTS    

The  table  below  shows  the  California  public  school  districts  organized  by  county  that  were  represented  by  teachers  in  the  MERIT  and  FAME  programs.  Six  MERIT  teachers  work  in  private  schools,  so  the  total  number  shown  is  38.  Additional  data  on  student  demographics  is  presented  to  show  the  percentages  of  underserved  students  in  the  district.  Districts  with  50  percent  or  more  of  low-­‐income  students  are  noted  in  bold.  

         

MERIT  2011  Teachers  

FAME  2011  Teachers  

Percentage  of  reported    English  Learners  /  students  of  color  /  low-­‐income  families  (Source:  Ed-­‐Data,  2009−10)  

Santa  Clara  County           Alum  Rock  Union   —   3   57%  /  87%  /  82%     Berryessa  Elementary   —   6   35%  /  45%  /  36%     Campbell  Union  Elementary   —   3   31%  /  9%  /  38%     Cupertino  Union   5   —   10%  /  8%  /  6%     Eastside  Union  High   1   —   22%  /  61%  /  39%     Evergreen  Elementary   —   3   27%  /  43%  /  31%     Franklin  McKinley   1   —   53%  /  68%  /  79%     Gilroy  Unified   —   2   32%  /  79%  /  63%     Los  Altos  Elementary   1   —   7%  /  21%  /  3%     Los  Gatos  Saratoga  Joint  High   1   —   1%  /  14%  /  1%     Moreland  Elementary   2   —   27%  /  45%  /  34%     Mountain  View-­‐Whisman   2   —   44%  /  55%  /  45%     Oak  Grove  Elementary   —   4   33%  /  61%  /  50%     Orchard  Elementary   —   3   32%  /  49%  /  49%     Palo  Alto  Unified   2   1   9%  /  24%  /  8%     Santa  Clara  Unified   4   —   32%  /  52%  /  44%  

   

San  Mateo  County       San  Bruno  Park   2   1   36%  /  65%  /  42%     San  Carlos  Elementary   —   1   7%  /  18%  /  5%     San  Mateo  Foster  City   1   5   29%  /  46%  /  30%     San  Mateo  Union  High   5   —   11%  /41%  /  17%            

Alameda  County           Alameda  Unified   1   —   22%  /  38%  /  33%     Dublin  Unified   2   —   10%  /  33%  /  15%     Pleasanton  Unified   3   —   7%  /  17%  /  6%            

Other           Elk  Grove  Unified   1   —   16%  /  55%  /  51%     Salinas  Union  High   1   —   33%  /  89%  /  62%     San  Francisco  Unified   1   —   24%  /  49%  /  57%     San  Ramon  Valley  Unified   2   —   4%  /  21%  /  3%          

Total  Public  School  Teachers   38   31    

Page 19: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   15  

 

KCI  LEADERSHIP  HIGHLIGHTS  

Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence  In  addition  to  program  development  and  implementation,  Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence  Steven  

McGriff,  Ph.D.,  participated  in  three  conferences.  He  presented  at  the  Silicon  Valley  Computer  Using  Educators  (SVCUE)  annual  teacher  technology  conference  in  March  on  the  topic  of  visual  literacy  and  communication  principles  and  served  as  co-­‐presenter  about  the  MERIT  program.  Also  in  March,  he  presented  on  visual  literacy  at  the  annual  Computer  Using  Educators  (CUE)  conference  in  Palm  Springs  and  co-­‐presented  on  educational  technology  for  administrative  leadership.  At  Foothill  College,  he  led  three  professional  development  workshops  for  faculty  and  staff  on  educational  technology  integration  in  the  college  curriculum.    

New  Strategy  and  Marketing  Leader  After  spending  a  year  as  an  Encore  Fellow  at  the  KCI,  focused  primarily  on  strategic  

planning,  Liane  Freeman  has  joined  the  KCI  management  team  on  a  full-­‐time  basis  to  head  up  strategy  and  marketing  efforts.  Liane  has  more  than  20  years  of  corporate  experience  in  the  energy  and  software  industries,  as  well  as  a  background  in  teaching  at  the  college  level.  She  is  using  this  experience  to  work  with  the  KCI  team  on  strategic  planning,  organizational  planning,  marketing,  and  development.    

KCI  OPERATIONS  

Strategic  Plan  Review  and  Program  Replication  Planning.    A  key  operational  strategy  for  the  KCI  is  to  have  a  robust  3-­‐year  strategic  plan—which  is  reviewed  annually—and  to  organize  operations  to  better  serve  the  needs  of  its  expanding  client  population.  The  focus  of  2010-­‐2011  was  to  conduct  program  replication  planning.    We  now  have  a  framework  for  replicating  our  programs  inside  and  outside  of  the  Bay  Area.  We  will  be  employing  a  network  model  that  relies  on  partners  as  program  operators.    At  this  point,  we  have  identified  a  couple  of  potential  partners  and  replication  sites.    

 Fundraising  and  Grant  Proposals.  The  KCI  continues  to  seek  funding  to  support  its  primary  

programs.  Although  the  KCI  is  part  of  Foothill  College,  it  requires  funds  to  support  its  staffing  and  programs,  such  as  ongoing  assistance  for  scholarships  for  educators  and  additional  instructional  and  staffing  needs.  The  KCI  also  seeks  to  raise  funds  for  new  positions  to  maintain  existing  programming  levels  and  expand  program  offerings,  to  increase  marketing  for  existing  programs,  to  stabilize  internal  operations,  and  to  position  itself  for  solid  program  development  in  the  future.  

 In  2010−11,  the  KCI  expanded  its  grant  proposal  efforts  and  collaborated  on  a  number  of  grants  

seeking  major  funding  to  replicate  its  trademark  teacher  professional  development  that  focuses  on  student-­‐centered  learning.  The  KCI  has  actively  partnered  with  other  nonprofit  organizations  and  universities  on  proposals  for  the  National  Science  Foundation  (NSF),  the  U.S.  Department  of  Education,  Silicon  Valley  Community  Foundation,  National  Semiconductor,  and  the  California  Math  and  Science  Project.      

 Budget.  Philanthropic  contributions  account  for  73  percent  of  the  KCI’s  funding,  with  the  

remaining  27  percent  coming  from  Foothill  College,  primarily  in  facility  support,  hardware,  software,  and  one  staff  position.  Donations  specified  for  operations  also  support  the  majority  of  the  KCI  staffing,  with  the  exception  of  class  instructors,  who  are  paid  by  the  State  of  California.  

Page 20: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   16  

 

 KCI  Operating  Budget        

   

                   

DESCRIPTION   TOTAL  KCI  BUDGET      

FUNDING  SOURCE  Personnel   Salary   Benefits   Total  

   FHDA   Donor  

           

   Includes:  Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence,  Program  Coordinator,  Strategy  &  Marketing  Director,  Senior  Web  Developer,  Web  Design  and  Support,  Admin  Assistance**   $334,717     $76,384     $411,101    

   

$131,606     $279,495                    KCI  Program  Budget        

   

   MERIT  Program  –    48  Participant  Teachers       $226,000    

   $0     $226,000    

FAME  Program  –    30  Participant  Teachers           $180,000    

       $0     $180,000    

           

   Detailed  Budget  for  KCI  Expenses      

   

   Supplies  and  Materials           $14,333    

       

$7,166     $7,166    Printing  -­‐  General       $19,845    

     

$9,923     $9,923    Postage  and  Mailings           $8,820    

       

$4,410     $4,410    Firewall  Maintenance  Agreement  

    $3,308          

$3,308     $0    

Cisco  Wireless  Maintenance           $1,323            

$0     $1,323    Software  Replacement  –  Labs       $30,000    

     

$15,000     $15,000    Photocopy  Rental/Lease           $3,528    

       

$3,528     $0    Photocopying       $3,859    

     

$1,929     $1,929    Adjunct  Faculty  Fees           $47,000    

       

$0     $47,000    Bldg.  Maintenance  –  FHDA  District  Budget  

    $110,250          

$110,250     $0    

Grand  Total           $1,059,366          

$287,120     $772,246    

Distribution  of  Total  Funding  Sources        

27%   73%    **Note:  all  staff  positions  are  part  time  with  the  exception  of  the  Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence,  Program  Coordinator,    and  Strategy  and  Marketing  Director  

 The  KCI  continues  to  work  within  the  Foothill−De  Anza  Community  College  District  to  address  

its  current  budget.  To  address  the  loss  of  staff  in  the  multimedia  lab,  the  KCI  formed  a  creative  partnership  with  the  Foothill  Entrepreneurs  Club  (FEC).  Today  FEC  students  manage  and  volunteer  staff  the  multimedia  lab,  which  gives  them  hands-­‐on  experience  and  allows  the  KCI  to  keep  the  lab  open  six  days  a  week  to  serve  students  and  community  members.    

   

 

Page 21: Innovate Educate Empower · Innovate Educate Empower AnnualReport2011 ! September!1,!2010!—August31,2011 !! MERIT!Summer!Institute!2011!!

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  Annual  Report  2011   17  

 

CONTACT  

For  more  information  about  this  report  or  KCI  programs,  please  contact:    

KCI  Leadership  Team  Gay  Krause   Steven  McGriff,  Ph.D.   Liane  Freeman  Executive  Director   Professor-­‐in-­‐Residence   Director,  Strategy  &  Marketing  650-­‐949-­‐7113   650-­‐949-­‐7681   650-­‐949-­‐7180  [email protected]   [email protected]   [email protected]  

 

KCI  Staff  Gayle  Britt   Kathy  Fransham   Rushton  Hurley  Instructional  Leader   FASTtech  Program  Coordinator   MERIT  Program  Director  650-­‐949-­‐7680   650-­‐949-­‐7614   650-­‐949-­‐7680  [email protected]   [email protected]   [email protected]    

 

Krause  Center  for  Innovation  

Foothill  College  

12345  El  Monte  Road  

Los  Altos  Hills,  CA  94022    

www.krauseinnovationcenter.org      

    Foothill  De  Anza  Community  College  District  Board  of  Trustees    

Joan   Barram;   Betsy   Bechtel;   Pearl   Cheng;   Laura   Casas   Frier;   Bruce  Swenson;  Stephanie  McGee,  Foothill  Student  Trustee;  Emily  Kinner,  De  Anza  Student  Trustee.    Foothill   College   does   not   discriminate   against   any   person   in   the  provision   of   its   educational   programs   and   services,   and   personnel  practices   on   the   basis   of   race,   color,   national   or   ethnic   origin,   age,  gender,   religion,  sexual  orientation,  marital  status,  physical  disability,  or   mental   disability.   Coordination   of   Title   IX   of   the   Education  Amendments   of   1972   prohibiting   sex   discrimination;   Section   504   of  the  Rehabilitation  Act  of  1973;  and  the  Americans  with  Disabilities  Act  of   1990   governing   accessibility   is   the   responsibility   of   acting   Vice  President  of  Instruction  and  Student  Development  Denise  Swett,  650-­‐949-­‐7228.  

   PHOTO  CREDITS:  Front  cover  and  page  7  group  photo,  Karim  Mansouri;  all  other  photos  taken  by  KCI  staff  EDITOR:  Ruth  Schecter