innovation zone update: board presentation march 12, 2012
DESCRIPTION
Innovation Zone Update: Board Presentation March 12, 2012. Innovation Zone and Lead Partner strategy Introduction to UP! and Cambium/NAEP Performance contract overview ESEA flexibility and local implications . Office of Transformation and Innovation. Our Mission. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
© 2012 Providence Public School District
1
Innovation Zone Update: Board Presentation
March 12, 2012
© 2012 Providence Public School District
2
• Innovation Zone and Lead Partner strategy
• Introduction to UP! and Cambium/NAEP
• Performance contract overview
• ESEA flexibility and local implications
© 2012 Providence Public School District
3
The OTI works directly with the district’s nine Innovation Schools and supports broader, district-wide reform efforts through three core functions:
1. Supporting Innovation Schools as they pursue innovative and sustainable reform strategies;
2. Monitoring progress made and outcomes achieved in the Innovation Schools;
3. Engaging partners and community members in the reform process.
PSD’s new Office of Transformation and Innovation (OTI) is committed to dramatically improving student achievement in Providence’s lowest-performing schools and inspiring district-wide innovation and reform.
Office of Transformation and Innovation
Performance MonitoringCommunity EngagementSchool Support
Our Mission
Our Role
© 2012 Providence Public School District
4
Innovation Zone Structure within PPSD
Additional Capacity
Thoughtful Clustering
Flexible Conditions
Innovation Zone
Providence School Department
Office of Transformation and Innovation Lead Partner
Lead Partner
Lead Partner
© 2012 Providence Public School District
5
District Turnaround Goals
Short-Term Goal: Long-Term Goal:
To dramatically accelerate and improve student achievement in the district’s most struggling schools by implementing comprehensive and innovative reform strategies and
aligning district resources to support these efforts.
To pursue broader, district-wide improvement by scaling promising practices, rethinking the structure of the district, and organizing the district central office to promote gains in student achievement.
© 2012 Providence Public School District
6
What is a Lead Partner?
are organizations or units of district central offices on contract with the district or state to turn around schools. Lead Partners receives authority and flexibility and are accountable for results. The role of the Lead Partner is defined by four overarching responsibilities:
Sign a 3-5 year performance contract for student achievement with the district or state that:• Assigns the Lead Partner responsibility for a small,
intentional cluster of schools where systems and programs will be aligned
• Holds the Lead Partner accountable for improving student achievement
Provide core academic and student support services directly or by aligning the services of other programs and supporting partners, who are on sub-contracts with the Lead Partner, and build internal capacity within the schools and by extension, the district
Assume authority for decision making on school staffing (as well as time, money, and program); the Lead Partner:• Hires a new principal or approves the current one• Supports the principal in hiring and replacing
teachers and has responsibility for bringing in a meaningful cohort of new instructional staff
Maintain an embedded, consistent, and intense relationship with each school, requiring a presence in each school 5 days per week during the turnaround period
1 2
3 4
Lead Partners:
ACCOUNTABILITY AUTHORITY
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES SCHOOL PRESENCE
© 2012 Providence Public School District
7
Critical Role and Function of Lead Partners: The Value Proposition for PPSD
Turnaround is complex and challenging work; Lead Partners provide additional capacity
Lead Partners bring knowledge and expertise and results in other urban districts
Lead Partners operate independently from the district and can be more efficient and more innovative
Lead Partners are designed to make the principal more successful by freeing up his/her time to serve as the building’s instructional leader
Turnaround schools are inundated with programs, partners, plans, etc.; the Lead Partner serves as the hub of these often disconnected spokes
Lead Partners experience scale benefits; by doing this work in multiple schools, they can provide the services at a lower cost than if one school were to do it alone
This is not a punitive measure; rather, we have the exciting opportunity to infuse our schools with additional capacity and turnaround expertise
Lead Partners will be held accountable for performance
© 2012 Providence Public School District
8
Lead Partner Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
Purpose: To identify highly effective Lead Partners to manage the turnaround process in clusters of Providence’s Innovation Schools.
# of Responses: 5
© 2012 Providence Public School District
9
Innovation Zone
Inside the Innovation Zone
Providence School Department
Lead Partner
Office of Transformation and Innovation
Cluster 1 Lead Partner: OTI
Cluster 2 Lead Partner: UP!
Cluster 3 Lead Partner: Cambium/NAEP
Roger Williams MS
Feinstein @ Sackett St ES
Young/ Woods ES
Pleasant View ES
Carl Lauro ESGilbert
Stuart MS
Dr. Jorge Alvarez HS
Mount Pleasant HS
Sanchez Complex
TBD
© 2012 Providence Public School District
10
• Innovation Zone and Lead Partner strategy
• Introduction to UP! and Cambium/NAEP
• Performance contract overview
• ESEA flexibility and local implications
© 2012 Providence Public School District
11
About United Providence!
Joint Labor-Management Compact
Reciprocal Obligation
• Reciprocal obligation is the mutual responsibility and commitment between labor and management to ensure student and school success.
• Reciprocal obligation extends to other important parties in the educational process including staff, partners, and family and community members.
• Rhode Island is the only state that allows districts to pursue the Restart model with an EMO managed collaboratively by labor and management.
• A Joint Labor-Management Compact must detail reciprocal obligations that create a new management structure with shared decision-making designed to fully address the needs of each student in the school.
UP!’s Mission
UP!’s mission is to maximize student achievement in Providence’s most struggling schools by promoting innovation and fostering a truly collaborative environment for teaching and learning. In so doing, UP! will serve as a groundbreaking national model for student-centered collaboration between labor and management.
© 2012 Providence Public School District
12
UP! Updates
UP! recently submitted its business plan to the Rhode Island Department of Education.
UP! also advanced the final round of the AFT Innovation Fund grant application process.
© 2012 Providence Public School District
13
About Cambium/NAEP
The mission of NAEP is to transform, sustain and accelerate education through the formation of partnerships with low-performing schools nationwide. NAEP works with schools and school districts to implement effective turnaround strategies such as building a system of outstanding schools to serve students, staff, families and the community in an accelerated learning environment that leaves no one behind.
Approach to School Turnaround
Cambium/NAEP’s Mission
© 2012 Providence Public School District
14
Cambium/NAEP’s Experience and Track Record
Example: Palm Beach County
Example: Milwaukee
Subtest Bay View HS Bradley HS
Language Arts
5% -5%
Math 8% 8%
Science 6% 6%
Social Studies
18% 7%
Increases in the percentage of students scoring proficient or higher during the 2010-11 SY
© 2012 Providence Public School District
15
• Innovation Zone and Lead Partner strategy
• Introduction to UP! and Cambium/NAEP
• Performance contract overview
• ESEA flexibility and local implications
© 2012 Providence Public School District
16
Purpose and Goals of the Performance Contract
• Formalize any understandings between parties• Codify the terms of the partnership as described in the accepted proposal (as
developed through the RFQ process)• Establish goals and benchmarks for both partners and districts/states• Create a sense of partnership and common goals• Provide a blueprint for the working relationship• Protect investments on both sides• Ensure fidelity of implementation • Clarify consequences for failing to meet any of the conditions (for all parties)
To articulate the roles, responsibilities, and expectations of the Lead Partner and the contracting local education agency.
Purpose:
Goals:
© 2012 Providence Public School District
17
Importance of the MOU
Lead Partners are guaranteed the autonomies, resources, and
support services they need from the district to do the work
The district ensures that Lead Partners will be held accountable
for results
Both parties benefit from a high level of detail and clarity upfront
© 2012 Providence Public School District
18
Lead Partner Contracting Process
• Provide ongoing oversight of performance agreements
• Secure/Maintain autonomies described in the MOU
• Provide services and supports described in the MOU
• Ensure faithfulness of implementation
• Develop Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to guide relationship(s) with partner(s)
• Negotiate terms of the MOU with the Lead Partner(s)
• Issue Lead Partner Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
• Market RFQ (identify and approach prospective partner organizations)
• Review proposals and select partner(s)
Post-MOU WorkMOU ProcessRFQ Selection Process
The OTI will continue to drive this process with the support of the legal department.
© 2012 Providence Public School District
19
Components of the MOU
Terms of Agreement:
• Parties to the agreement • Duration of the agreement• Options for renewal, expiration, and
termination• Funding and compensation for partners
1 Operating Conditions and Services:
• Autonomies – Scope of decision-making authority over (1) people, (2) time, (3) money, and (4) programming
• Mechanisms for securing autonomy – Ex: waivers/exemptions, thin contracts, EWAs
Performance Accountability:
• Implementation – Fidelity to the school reform plan and agreed upon scope of services and deliverables
• Impact – Gains measured by leading and lagging indicators of school turnaround
Roles and Responsibilities:
• Scope of services and deliverables• Service-/Resource- sharing agreements• Communication norms between the
partner and contracting agency • Expectations of the partner and district
3
2
4
© 2012 Providence Public School District
20
Lead Partner Performance Metrics
Historic and Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
Student attendance rate
Chronic absenteeism rate
Number of suspensions (out-of-school)
First time credit acquisition rate
Math proficiency rate (teaching year)
Reading proficiency rate (teaching year)
Writing proficiency rate (teaching year)
Science proficiency rate (teaching year)
Graduation rate
Dropout rate
In exchange for increased flexibility and authority, Lead Partners will be held accountability for implementing the school reform plans and improving student achievement.
© 2012 Providence Public School District
21
Lead Partner Compensation
• National benchmarking research shows that Lead Partners typically receive
a management contract totaling approximately 7-12% of the school’s per pupil allocation.
• During FY 09, PPSD’s per pupil allocation was $15,305.
• Assuming that Lead Partners work with approximately 1,500 students, then
a baseline management fee would be $1.6 M.
• Therefore, the proposed contracts with Cambium/NAEP and UP! are reasonable and research-based.
© 2012 Providence Public School District
22
• Innovation Zone and Lead Partner strategy
• Introduction to UP! and Cambium/NAEP
• Performance contract overview
• ESEA flexibility and local implications
© 2012 Providence Public School District
23
What is the ESEA Waiver?
History and Context
• The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was enacted in 1965 to provide all students with equal access to a public education and establish high standards and accountability
• In 2001, Congress amended and reauthorized ESEA as the No Child Lead Behind Act (NCLB); NCLB has been in place for over a decade; however, it has some flaws
ESEA Flexibility: The Opportunity
• The U.S. Department of Education has invited state education agencies (SEAs) to request flexibility on behalf of the state, local education agencies, and schools
• States can voluntary choose to submit a waiver in order to pursue a state-developed plan to improve educational outcomes for all students, close achievement gaps, increase equity, and improve the quality of instruction
Waiver Status
• 11 states have already been approved for ESEA flexibility• 26 states and Washington, D.C. submitted flexibility requests in February
2012; the Rhode Island Department of Education submitted a waiver application in February
© 2012 Providence Public School District
24
Anticipated Impact in Providence
• The School Improvement Grant program will no longer exist in its current form (e.g., the four models no longer apply)
• RIDE must identify Reward, Priority, and Focus schools
• Priority and Focus Schools must develop and implement reform plans in accordance with the processes outlined by RIDE and approved by the US DOE
• SEAs and LEAs will have increased flexibility over certain federal funding streams
• More schools in Providence will be identified, and more schools will be identified soon
• Low-performing schools will be expected to design bold and comprehensive reform plans; however, schools will have more flexibility in designing these reform strategies
• We must continue to invest in the Innovation Zone so that we are prepared for the next round of Focus and Priority Schools
RIDE is identifying approximately 30 schools that will be required to implement interventions. Of these schools, 11 of them have already been identified as PLA schools and, for those schools, their identification with not change
their requirements, funding, or plans. Based on Providence’s past performance, we should be prepared to have at least half of the remaining schools identified in our district.
© 2012 Providence Public School District
25
RIDE’s Proposed Tiered Intervention Strategy for Low-Performing Schools
Reward Schools
The state’s high-performing and high-progress schools
Priority Schools
The state’s lowest-performing schools equal to at least 5% of the State’s Title I schools
Focus Schools
A number of low-performing schools equal to at least 10% of the State’s Title I Schools
Focus and Priority Schools identified by RIDE (spring 2012)
RIDE completes diagnostic identifying LEA and school strengths and
weaknesses
Closure Restart Flex plan
RIDE approval RIDE approval
Planning Early implementation
Full implementation
Full implementation
Full implementation
Full implementation
School Year 2011-12,
Summer ‘12
School Year 2012-13
School Year 2013-14
School Year 2014-15
© 2012 Providence Public School District
26
For More Information
Email us: [email protected]
Visit our website: www.ppsdinnovationzone.org