insights - cleveland clinicprofile in brain regions but suffers from long data acqui-sition times....
TRANSCRIPT
Insights 2013A publication of the Center for Behavioral Health
Whole Brain 3-D Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyNew Windows into the Abnormalities Underlying Neuropsychiatric DiseaseSee page 4
Download our new Physician Referral App
With our new free Physician Referral
App, contacting us is easier than ever.
Download it today at the App Store or
Google Play.
24/7 ReferralsReferring Physician Hotline
855.REFER.123 (855.733.3712)
Go green with Cleveland Clinic today!
Scan this code with your device to
connect to our Medical Professionals
page and sign up to receive publications
electronically from Cleveland Clinic’s
Neurological Institute.
Insights 2013
In tHIS ISSue
neuRoIMAgIng In PSYCHIAtRIC DISeASe
4 Whole Brain 3-D Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Advancing the exploration of neuropsychiatric Disorders — Amit Anand, MD, and Pallab K. Bhattacharyya, PhD
CLInICAL tRIALS In ALZHeIMeR DISeASe
7 ‘Multiple Shots on goal’ Strategy Aims to empower Patients Against Alzheimer Disease — Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD, and Kate Zhong, MD
PSYCHo-onCoLogY
10 Psycho-oncology update: Innovating an Approach to Systematic Distress Screening in Patients with Cancer — Beth Gardini Dixon, PsyD, and Isabel Schuermeyer, MD
funCtIonAL IMAgIng In neuRoPSYCHIAtRY
12 Magnetoencephalography Provides new Window into Brain Connectivity Across Diverse neuropsychiatric Conditions — Patricia Klaas, PhD, and John C. Mosher, PhD
ADDICtIon MeDICIne
14 Medication-Assisted treatment with Suboxone: finding Success with a nontraditional Approach to opiate Dependence — Jason M. Jerry, MD
BRAIn StIMuLAtIon In neuRoPSYCHIAtRIC DISeASe
16 Development of Innovative technologies for Brain Stimulation: going Microscopic to overcome earlier Limitations — John T. Gale, PhD
IntenSIve outPAtIent tHeRAPY
19 outcomes Collection effort Showcases value of an evolving Intensive outpatient Program — Daniel Jones, PhD
PSYCHIAtRY eDuCAtIon
21 Medical Students and the eMR: Improving the educational experience by tailoring templates — Margo C. Funk, MD
PeDIAtRIC BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH
24 early Intensive Behavioral Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorders Maximizes Mainstream educational Placements — Thomas W. Frazier II, PhD
BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH In CARDIovASCuLAR DISeASe
26 Hearts and Minds: offering Behavioral Health Services in a Cardiology Clinic to Boost Patients’ Spirits — and Outcomes — Leo Pozuelo, MD, and Leslie Cho, MD
ADoLeSCent PSYCHIAtRY
28 electroconvulsive therapy: underutilized Modality Can Be Safe, effective for Severe Mood Disorders in Adolescents — Joseph Austerman, DO
ALSo InSIDe
31 Staff Listing
32 Resources for Physicians
on tHe CoveR: three-dimensional maps of brain metabolites using a high- spatial-resolution 3-D PePSI pulse sequence. See article on page 4.
Dear Colleagues,
Donald A. Malone Jr., MD
Medical Editor
glenn Campbell
Managing Editor
Anne Drago
Art Director
Insights is published by Cleveland
Clinic’s Center for Behavioral Health to
provide the latest information about the
center’s clinical services and research.
Insights is written for physicians and
should be relied on for medical educa-
tion purposes only. It does not provide
a complete overview of the topics
covered and should not replace the
independent judgment of a physician
about the appropriateness or risks of a
procedure for a given patient.
the Center for Behavioral Health is part
of the multidisciplinary Cleveland Clinic
neurological Institute, which is dedi-
cated to the diagnosis and treatment of
common and complex neurological dis-
orders of adult and pediatric patients.
Its more than 300 specialists combine
expertise and compassion to achieve
measurably superior results. By
promoting innovative research and care
models, the neurological Institute ac-
celerates development and application
of new treatments and technologies to
patient care. the neurological Institute
is one of 27 institutes at Cleveland
Clinic, a nonprofit academic medical
center ranked among the nation’s top
hospitals (U.S. News & World Report),
where nearly 3,000 physicians in 120
specialties collaborate to give every pa-
tient the best outcome and experience.
clevelandclinic.org
Psychiatric research and discovery have deep roots at Cleveland Clinic. Did you know
that in 1948 researchers here were the first to isolate a batch of a substance in blood that
we know today as serotonin?1 Those Cleveland Clinic researchers gave the substance its
name, to reflect its presence in blood serum (sero) and its effect on vascular tone (tonin).
While the early characterization of serotonin sets a high bar for research achievement,
today’s clinicians and researchers in Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Behavioral Health are
committed to upholding that legacy, as demonstrated by the diverse research initiatives
profiled in this issue of Insights. Here are a few examples:
• Inourcoverstory,Drs.AmitAnandandPallabBhattacharyyaoutlinetheinsights
they are gaining through whole brain 3-D magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging
and how they plan to build on these insights with Cleveland Clinic’s new 7-tesla (7T)
MRIscanner,whichourNeurologicalInstituteacquiredinmid-2013.
• Onpage7,Dr.JeffreyCummings,oneoftheworld’spremierAlzheimerdisease(AD)
researchers, and Dr. Kate Zhong share the rationale and potential benefits of the
nearlymatchless“multipleshotsongoal”ADresearchstrategythey’veputinplace
at Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health.
• Onpage12,Drs.PatriciaKlaasandJohnMosherexplainwhyandhowtheyarelever-
aging Cleveland Clinic’s highly prolific magnetoencephalography (MEG) laboratory
to pursue innovative MEG research in multiple neuropsychiatric applications.
• Onpage16,Dr.JohnGaleupdatesusonpromisingworkhisgroupisdoingtoover-
come limits of current brain stimulation methods with a novel modality known as
microscopic magnetic stimulation.
Inbetweentheseandotherresearchprofilesarereportsofmanynotableclinicalactivi-
ties across our center, from an innovative tool to systematically screen for psychosocial
distress in cancer patients to our nontraditional but highly successful approach to treat-
ing opiate dependence.
We intend this publication as a launching pad for dialogue with you, our colleagues
aroundthenation.Ifyouseesomethingofinterest,don’thesitatetocontactmeormy
colleagues featured within to continue the exchange.
Sincerely,
DonaldA.MaloneJr.,MD
Director, Center for Behavioral Health
Chairman, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology
President, Lutheran Hospital
RefeReNCe
1.RapportMM,GreenAA,PageIH.Serumvasoconstrictor,serotonin;isolationandcharacterization. J Biol Chem.1948;176(3):1243-1251.
© the Cleveland Clinic foundation 2013 CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 3
Whole Brain 3-D Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
MRSI,alsoknownaschemicalshiftimaging,records
spectroscopicdataforagroupofvoxelsusinganMRI
scanner. To date, attempts to characterize the neuro-
biological basis of psychiatric illness have used proton
MRSItononinvasivelymeasuretheneurochemical
environment within the brain. The neurochemicals most
commonly visualized are:
• Lactate
• ThemetabolitesN-acetylaspartate(NAA),creatine(Cr)
and choline (Cho)
• Theaminoacidsγ-aminobutyricacid(GABA),glutamate
and glutamine
Asimagingtoolsarerefined,knowledgeofbrainneu-
rochemistry in neuropsychiatric disorders will expand,
promising better disease detection, superior therapy
monitoringandimproveddrugdevelopment.New
imagingmethodsandtechniquestomapmetabolites
in larger volumes of the brain are being developed to
accomplishthesegoals.Advancesinhardwareandpulse
sequenceshavealreadymadeitpossibletoscanamuch
larger portion of the brain in three dimensions (3-D) with
good signal-to-noise ratio and in reasonable scan time.1-3
This article highlights the advantage of building on
theseadvancesbyperforming3-DMRSItogainclinical
insights and discusses the potential for future insights
withtherecentarrivalofa7-tesla(7T)MRIscannerat
Cleveland Clinic.
Whole Brain 3-D Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Advancing the exploration of neuropsychiatric Disorders
By Amit Anand, MD, and Pallab K. Bhattacharyya, PhD
n E u R o i M A G i n G i n P S y C H i A t R i C D i S E A S E
Figure 1. Single-slice spectra of N-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr) and choline (Cho) using three-dimensional proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI). A total of eight slices were scanned for this study.
Mapping biochemical information in the brain has the potential to unlock the biochemical processes involved in neu-
ropsychiatric disorders, which remain poorly understood. Although techniques such as proton magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (MRS) have yielded insight into the workings of the brain, these techniques are mostly restricted to
single voxels (to obtain relatively large signal over a homogeneous area of brain) and thus to small areas of the brain
that sometimes may not be relevant to psychiatric illness. in addition to single-voxel spectroscopy, multivoxel MR
spectroscopic imaging (MRSi) has long been used in spectroscopy studies, but MRSi studies often scan over a single
slice and require long scan times to obtain useful information.
4 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
n E u R o i M A G i n G i n P S y C H i A t R i C D i S E A S E
Abnormalitiesinconcentrationsofthesemetabolites
are indicators of abnormal neuronal energy metabolism,
which is known to occur in several neuropsychiatric
disorders. For technical reasons, a single-voxel design
that allows signal detection from a well-defined area and
requiresshortermeasurementtimestypicallyhasbeen
employed. Unfortunately, measuring localization limits
measurement to brain areas that may not be involved in
psychiatric illness (e.g., the occipital cortex) and therefore
does not provide a meaningful and comprehensive
picture of whole brain metabolite concentrations.
Althoughacquisitiontimesareshorterwithsingle-voxel
spectroscopy, that approach is best suited to imaging
when a volume of interest is known. Multivoxel spectro-
scopicmethodscanpresentdatain2-Dor3-Dimages.
Multivoxel spectroscopy is able to identify the metabolite
profileinbrainregionsbutsuffersfromlongdataacqui-
sition times.
Building on insights from 2-D Studies
Inarecentstudy,Dr.Anandandcolleagues,4 using a sin-
gle-slice2-Dtechnique,reporteddifferentconcentrations
of glutamate in different brain regions among patients
with bipolar depression, patients with bipolar mania and
healthy controls, whereas concentrations of lactate were
uniformly high in all regions.
Thisdiscoveryhasignitedaquesttostudychemical
changes in large volumes of brain simultaneously. By
using 3-D proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging
(PePSI),brainmetabolitescanbemeasuredsimultane-
ously from multiple brain regions to accelerate spectra
acquisitiontimes.Usingahigh-spatial-resolution3-D
PePSIpulsesequenceat3Tfieldstrength,high-quality
spectra of the metabolites from a large part of the brain
were obtained (Figure 1). The scan also generated excel-
lent3-DmapsofNAA,CrandCho(figure2).
Figure 2. Three-dimensional maps of N-acetylaspartate, creatine and choline using a 3-D PEPSI sequence.
n-Acetyl Aspartate
Creatine
Choline
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 5
n E u R o i M A G i n G i n P S y C H i A t R i C D i S E A S E
new opportunities with 7t MRi Scanner
ClevelandClinic’sCenterforNeuroimagingrecently
acquireda7TSiemensMRIscannertoconductstate-of-
the-artMRI/MRSstudies,makingoursoneofthefirst
institutionstousea7TMRIscannerinaneuropsychiat-
ric research setting. The advantages of MRS at 7T include:
• Ahighsignal-to-noiseratiotoenhanceimagequalityby
decreasing voxel size
• Improvedspatialresolutionrelativetoothernoninvasive
imagingtechniques
WewillbeworkingtodevelopMRSIsequencessuited
for ultra-high fields to take advantage of the increased
spatial and spectral resolution they provide.
With our new ability — made possible by ultra-high field
strengths — to map metabolite distribution in the entire
brain, we hope to gain further insight into the pathophys-
iology of neurological and psychiatric disorders. n
KEy PointS
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides an invaluable tool to noninvasively study the neurochemis-try of the living brain in neuropsychiatric disorders.
Whole brain 3-D MRS imaging could potentially be an extremely important tool to study the distribution and concentration of metabolites in the whole brain, provid-ing a comprehensive picture of what abnormalities may underlie neuropsychiatric disorders.
7t MRI scanners offer improved signal-to-noise ratio and faster imaging to facilitate whole brain study, over-coming limitations of traditional MR imaging modalities in neuropsychiatric disease. Cleveland Clinic is one of the first institutions to use a 7T scanner in a research setting to study brain neurochemistry in neuropsychiat-ric disorders.
RefeReNCeS
1.MaudsleyAA,DomenigC,GovindV,etal.Mappingofbrain metabolite distributions by volumetric proton MR spectroscopicimaging(MRSI).Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(3):548-559.
2.PosseS,OtazoR,DagerSR,AlgerJ.MRspectroscopicimaging: principles and recent advances. J Magn Reson Imaging.2013;37(6):1301-1325.
3.OtazoR,TsaiSY,LinfH,PosseS.Acceleratedshort-Te3D proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging using 2D-SeNSewitha32-channelarraycoil.Magn Reson Med. 2007;58(6):1107-1116.
4.XuJ,DydakU,HarezlakJ,NixonJ,DzemidzicM,GunnAD,KarneHS,AnandA.Neurochemicalabnormalitiesinunmedicatedbipolardepressionandmania:A2D1HMRS investigation. Psychiatry Res Neuroimag. 2013;213:235-241.
Dr. Anand is Vice Chairman for Research and Director of the
Mood Disorders Clinical and Research Program in Cleve-
land Clinic’s Center for Behavioral Health and Department
of Psychiatry and Psychology. His specialty interests include
mood and bipolar disorders, depression, brain imaging,
clinical psychopharmacology and personalized medicine.
He can be reached at 216.636.2840 or [email protected].
Dr. Bhattacharyya is an assistant staff member in the
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute,
and in the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment
and Research, Neurological Institute. He can be reached at
216.444.5364 or [email protected].
6 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
C l i n i C A l t R i A l S i n A l z H E i M E R D i S E A S E
CLeveLAnD CLInIC Lou Ruvo CenteR foR BRAIn HeALtH:
‘Multiple Shots on goal’ Strategy Aims to empower Patients Against Alzheimer Disease
By Jeffrey Cummings, MD, ScD, and Kate Zhong, MD
CurrenttreatmentsforAD,whichincludecholinesterase
inhibitors and memantine, offer temporary symptomatic
benefit. They improve cognition, function and behavior
in some patients and delay disease progression in most.
They do not modify the underlying disease process. There
is an urgent need to identify disease-modifying therapies
thatwillpreventAD,delayitsonsetorslowitsprogres-
sion.Inaddition,newagentsareneededtofurther
improveAD’ssymptomaticmanifestations.
Morethan80agentsarecurrentlyinclinicaltrialsforthe
treatmentofsomephaseofAD,includingnoveldisease-
modifying and symptomatic treatments. Cleveland
Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (LRCBH) has
one of the largest clinical trials programs in the United
StatesforADtherapeutics.Ourinnovativemultisite
organization, detailed below, helps develop strategies to
transformtheclinicaltrialsprocess,improvethequality
oftrialsanddevelopnewtherapiesforAD.
Addressing the Pathophysiology of AD
ThemolecularneurobiologyofADisincreasinglywell
understood.Amyloidproteinabnormalitiesinthebrain
are among the first identifiable biological changes in
the disease and are manifested by a reduction in beta
amyloid levels in the CSF and deposition of amyloid
in the brain on amyloid imaging (Figure 1). There is
increasingcelldeathasADprogresses,withlibera-
tion of tau protein into the spinal fluid and exposure of
intercellular neurofibrillary tangles to the CSF, leading
to increases in CSF tau and hyperphosphorylated tau
(p-tau).Neurodegenerationalsoleadstoincreasing
atrophyonMRI.Cerebralmetabolismiscompromised,
as demonstrated by reduced cerebral metabolic activity
on FDG-PET studies. There are biomarkers for the major
milestonesofAD.
Multiple Shots on Goal
Approximately95percentofdrugsaddressingCNS
diseases fail, and disease-modifying interventions have
proved particularly difficult to develop.2 To advance
therapies, it is important to have “multiple shots on goal”
since only a very few test agents become successful drugs.
With this in mind, the LRCBH has developed a balanced
matrix type of clinical trials program, with agents target-
ing multiple disease stages in a variety of formulations
andwithdiversemechanismsofaction(figure2).
Multiple treatment options are being assessed to match
patients’ needs and preferences, from immunotherapies
administered by intravenous or subcutaneous injection
to oral medications to device-based therapies such as
transcranialmagneticstimulation.Dextromethorphan/
quinidine(Nuedexta™)isbeinginvestigatedforits
potential impact on agitation, while other interven-
tions are being assessed for cognitive and functional
outcomes.Anti-amyloiddisease-modifyingtherapies,
non-amyloid targeted disease-modifying therapies and
symptomatic interventions are all being assessed by the
LRCBH clinical trials program (Figure 3).
Empowering Patients
ThefDA’srequirementthatnewtherapieshavetheir
efficacy demonstrated by randomized, placebo-con-
trolledtrialsbeforeapprovaliswellestablished.Oneof
its underappreciated implications is that patients must
be engaged in the drug development process in order for
The challenge posed by Alzheimer disease (AD) is stark: If no means of preventing or delaying AD is identified, the
number of Americans suffering from the disease is projected to rise from 5.3 million today to over 13 million by 2050.1
Figure 1. Amyloid imaging scans show contrasting findings in a patient with Alzheimer-type dementia, with heavy amyloid deposition (left), and in a healthy control subject of similar age (right).
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 7
C l i n i C A l t R i A l S i n A l z H E i M E R D i S E A S E
it to succeed. Patients are thus empowered to contrib-
ute in an essential way to the development of therapies
for the diseases that afflict them. This motivation is
strengthened by the realization that the children and
grandchildren of affected individuals are at increased
riskforADunlessnewinterventionsarefound.
The scope of the LRCBH’s clinical trials program signals
ourcommitmenttoofferingADpatientsbroadoppor-
tunitiesforsuchempowerment.Oneofthewayswe
do so is through a network of trial sites with extensive
nationalreach.TheLRCBHhaslocationsinLasVegas,
Nev.;atClevelandClinic’smaincampusinCleveland;in
Lakewood,Ohio,outsideofCleveland;andinWeston,
fla.ThesesitesformauniqueADclinicaltrialsconsor-
tium that matches patient location with available studies.
The consortium amplifies our ability to engage multiple
patients in clinical trials and accelerate therapeutic
testing,anditpromisestoimprovetrialqualityand
efficacy.
impacting trial Methodology
AleadinggoaloftheLRCBHclinicaltrialsprogramis
to transform trials by identifying methodologies that
improvequalityandacceleratedrugdevelopment.Recent
LRCBH publications address important issues that
impactdrugdevelopmentforAD.Globalizationisoccur-
ring rapidly, but the science of globalization remains
poorly developed.3Avarietyofclinicaltrialdesignshave
alsobeenfostered,bothforADandfornon-ADneuro-
degenerativedisorders.ArecentreviewfromtheLRCBH
highlighted the importance of matching the design
of a clinical trial to the trial’s goal.4 Studies of placebo
groups recently showed that older patients in clinical
trials decline more slowly than younger patients.5 This
has important implications for sample size determina-
tions since a larger number of older patients would be
needed to show a drug-placebo difference compared
with trials enrolling younger subjects. Recent reviews
from the LRCBH have addressed the translation of data
from animal models to human clinical trials,6 use of
repurposedagentstotreatAD7 and use of translational
research methodologies to enhance drug development.8
Summary
AsADprevalencecontinuestoriseatanalarmingrate,
new therapies are urgently needed. The LRCBH is testing
multiple diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in a
balanced matrix approach with a multiple-shots-on-goal
philosophy.Ourdistributednetworkofclinicaltrialsites
utilizing the geography of Cleveland Clinic is an innova-
tive advantage for clinical trials and drug development.
Ourapproachrecognizesthattrialsdependonpatients
acting as citizen-scientists who empower themselves to
help fight the diseases that afflict them. n
Prevention Prodromal AD AD Dementia
ADnI ADnI ADnI
Professional fighters Study Aclarus Dx® blood test Aclarus Dx blood test
Pioglitazone MK-8931 MK-8931
Immunotherapy ACC-001 Immunotherapy ACC-001
Immunotherapy BIIB037
Immunotherapy MABt5102A
Immunotherapy IvIg
Bexarotene
Resveratrol
DM/Q (agitation)
transcranial magnetic stimulation
AC-1204
Amyloid imaging
Biomarker study
Disease-modifying treatment
Symptomatic treatment
Figure 2. Balanced matrix of therapeutics and diagnostics being assessed in the LRCBH clinical trials program. Agents/studies are grouped according to whether they represent prevention approaches in patients with normal cognition, drugs addressing mild cognitive symptoms in patients with prodro-mal AD, or drugs for more severe behavioral and cognitive symptoms in patients with Alzheimer dementia. ADNI = Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimag-ing Initiative; DM/Q = dextromethorphan/quinidine.
8 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
C l i n i C A l t R i A l S i n A l z H E i M E R D i S E A S E
KEy PointS
Clinical trials can empower patients to help overcome the diseases that afflict them and, in the case of AD, threaten their children and grandchildren.
Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (LRCBH) has one of the nation’s most active clinical trials programs for AD, with a repertoire of disease-mod-ifying and symptomatic approaches under investigation for patients at risk of AD and those with prodromal AD or AD dementia.
the LRCBH’s distributed network of clinical trial sites takes advantage of the wide-ranging geography of Cleveland Clinic to expand patient access to investiga-tional therapies and accelerate therapeutic testing.
RefeReNCeS
1.Alzheimer’sAssociation.2013Alzheimer’sdiseasefactsand figures. Alzheimers Dement.2013;9:208-245.
2.BeckerRe,GreigNH.WhysofewdrugsforAlzheimer’sdisease?Aremethodsfailingdrugs?Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010;7:642-651.
3.CummingsJ,ReyndersR,ZhongK.GlobalizationofAlzheimer’sdiseaseclinicaltrials.Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011;3:24-33.
4.CummingsJL,GouldH,ZhongK.AdvancesindesignsforAlzheimer’sdiseaseinclinicaltrials.Am J Neuro-degen Dis.2012;1:205-216.
5.BernickC,CummingsJ,RamanR,SunX,AisenP.AgeandrateofcognitivedeclineinAlzheimerdisease:implica-tions for clinical trials. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:901-905.
6.SabbaghJJ,KinneyJW,CummingsJL.AnimalsystemsinthedevelopmentoftreatmentsforAlzheimer’sdisease:challenges, methods, and implications. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:169-183.
7.ApplebyB,NacopoulosD,MilanoN,ZhongK,CummingsJ.Areview:treatmentofAlzheimer’sdiseasediscoveredin repurposed agents. Dementia Geriatr Cog Disorder. 2013;35:1-22.
8.CummingsJL,BanksS,GaryR,KinneyJ,LombardoJ,WalshR,ZhongK.Alzheimer’sdiseasedrugdevelop-ment: translational neuroscience strategies. CNS Spectr. 2013;18(3):128-138.
Dr. Cummings is Director of Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo
Center for Brain Health. His specialty interests include
Alzheimer disease and drug development. He can be reached
at 702.483.6029 or [email protected].
Dr. Zhong is Senior Director for Research at Cleveland Clinic
Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health. Her specialty interests
include Alzheimer disease, mood disorders and drug develop-
ment. She can be reached at 702.483.6049 or [email protected].
Disclosures
Dr. Cummings has provided consultation to the follow-
ing pharmaceutical or device companies: Abbott, Acadia,
ADAMAS, Anavex, Avanir, Baxter, Bristol-Myers Squibb,
Eisai, Elan, EnVivo, Forest, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline,
Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Neuronix, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer,
Prana, QR, Sanofi, Sonexa, Takeda and Toyama.
Dr. Zhong has provided consultation to the following phar-
maceutical or device companies: Baxter, Janssen and Pfizer.
Figure 3. Organization of the LRCBH clinical trials program according to the mechanism of action targeted.
Amyloid disease-modifying
• Bexarotene
• Immunotherapy
• BACE inhibitor
non-amyloid disease-modifying
• Resveratrol
• Pioglitazone
Symptomatic
• Dextromethorphan/quinidine
• Transcranial magnetic stimulation
• Axona®
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 9
P S y C H o - o n C o l o G y
Recognizing the significant mental health needs of
oncologypatients,theNationalInstitutesofHealthand
theInstituteofMedicine(IOM)assembledamultidisci-
plinary committee to investigate barriers to psychosocial
healthcare in ambulatory oncology centers. The com-
mittee’sfindingswerepublishedina2007IOMreport,
Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial
Needs,1 which outlined a new standard that integrates
psychosocial health services into cancer care. Part of this
new standard calls for routine psychosocial “distress”
screeningofoncologypatients(figure1).TheAmerican
College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer has adopted
theIOMrecommendations,addingevaluationofdistress
asarequisiteforaccreditationeffectivein2015.
Some studies suggest that patients tend not to disclose
their psychological concerns to their medical providers
and that depression and anxiety are underrecognized and
undertreated in oncology settings. Systematic screening,
however, encourages early identification of and interven-
tion for at-risk individuals, offering the opportunity to
mitigate the emotional burden and medical care-related
costs resulting from mental health problems.
Making Screening Systematic
Challenges to the implementation of screening include
enabling easy completion by patients and delivering
clinically relevant results to providers in a rapid, acces-
siblemanner.Asmorehealthcaresystemsincorporate
electronic medical records (EMRs), integrating screening
data into the chart is critical.
Ourpsychosocialoncologyprogramhasdeveloped
ascreeningsystemthatusesauniqueCleveland
Cleveland-designed tool called the Knowledge Program.
The Knowledge Program immediately imports screen-
Distress Screening: A Call to Action
The prevalence of depression is markedly higher in
theoncologypopulation,at25percent,comparedwith
the general population, where lifetime prevalence is
16percent.Ratesofanxietyarenotablyhigheraswell,
particularly in patients with advanced cancer. These
psychiatric disorders directly impact medical care and
may result in prolonged hospitalizations, delays in
starting treatment, reduced adherence to therapy, lower
pain tolerance and a tendency to receive more aggressive
therapies at the end of life. Moreover, individuals with
cancer are three times more likely to commit suicide
than the general population, with poor cancer prognosis
conferring greater risk.
Psycho-oncology update: Innovating an Approach to Systematic Distress Screening in Patients with Cancer
By Beth Gardini Dixon, PsyD, and Isabel Schuermeyer, MD
KEy PointS
Beginning in 2015, routine psychosocial distress screening of oncology patients will be a requisite for accreditation by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer.
Cleveland Clinic’s psychosocial oncology program has developed a screening system that uses an eMR-integrated screening tool to assess patients for psy-chosocial distress, enabling providers to view results at the time of patient visits.
use of this eMR-integrated screening tool has enabled us to gauge whether we are meeting program goals and has guided our selection of screening instruments.
Systematic screening for psychosocial distress in oncol-ogy patients helps uphold standards in care quality and facilitate optimal patient outcomes.
Receiving a cancer diagnosis is a significant stressor for even the most resilient individuals. Factors such as disease
severity, complex treatment regimens and uncertainty about prognosis can magnify distress for patients and their
families. Research has demonstrated that a cancer diagnosis increases the risk for depression, anxiety and reduced
quality of life. not only are these risks present during active oncology treatment, but emerging literature on survivor-
ship suggests that distress may persist beyond the period of active care. new standards in oncology prioritize emo-
tional well-being as a key aspect of treatment, and Cleveland Clinic’s taussig Cancer institute, in collaboration with
the Center for Behavioral Health, is responding with innovative screening strategies.
10 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
P S y C H o - o n C o l o G y
ing results into the EMR. Patients
complete the screening tool on a
tablet computer when checking in for
appointments. Screening informa-
tion is then transferred electronically
into the EMR so that the provider has
the immediate results prior to seeing
the patient. This system allows for
intervention during the appointment
and helps guide referrals to specific
services.
letting Data Drive improvements
Anotherdistinctivefeatureofthe
Knowledge Program-based screen-
ing method involves compilation of
results into a database for analysis.
Data may be sorted according to
multiple variables, such as demo-
graphics, disease type and test
scores. Comparing aggregate data
to expected patterns based on the
published literature has enabled us
to gauge whether we are meeting the
program goals.
During our pilot phase of screening
implementation, this data analysis
capability highlighted limitations of the trial screening
instrument we were using, which appeared to under-
estimate clinically significant distress levels in our
outpatient oncology population. For instance, this instru-
mentfoundonly9percentofpatientsinthefirstquarter
of2013tohavemoderateorhighlevelsofdistress,which
is markedly lower than the expected rate of approxi-
mately35percent.Thesefindingspromptedustorevise
our selection of screening instruments.
ongoing need Calls for a Systems Solution
Psychosocial healthcare needs to be addressed through-
out the continuum of cancer care. Systematically
monitoring and tracking distress — as one element of a
comprehensive psychosocial health services program —
servestoupholdnewqualitystandardsinoncologyand
facilitate optimal treatment outcomes. n
RefeReNCe
1.InstituteofMedicine. Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Needs. Washington, D.C.: The NationalAcademiesPress;2007.
Dr. Dixon is a staff clinical psychologist in the Psycho-Oncol-
ogy Program in Cleveland Clinic’s Taussig Cancer Institute.
She can be reached at 216.442.5229 or [email protected].
Dr. Schuermeyer is Director of Psycho-Oncology and a staff
psychiatrist in Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Behavioral
Health and the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology.
She can be reached at 216.444.5965 or [email protected].
The authors wish to acknowledge the Psycho-Oncology
Program social workers and the Knowledge Program team
for their contributions to the work reported here.
Standard of Psychosocial Care
facilitate effective communication between:
Patient/family
team
Provider
Identify patient/family psychosocial needs
Design and implement plan
follow up, re-evaluate and adjust plan
Coordinate biomedical and psychosocial care
engage patient/family in the management of illness
Link patient/family to services
Figure 1. Model for psychosocial services in oncology. Adapted
from the Institute of Medicine.1
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 11
Making Sense of the Brain’s Weak Magnetic Fields
UnlikefunctionalMRI,whichusesstrongmagnetic
fields, MEG instead measures the extraordinarily weak
magnetic fields generated by brain functions. Using no
radiation or magnetic fields, sensors in a helmet (gradi-
ometersand/ormagnetometers)pickupthemagnetic
fields generated by the brain’s electrochemical activity.
Becausethegeneratedmagneticfieldisquitesmall,
about 1 billion times smaller than the earth’s magnetic
field,itsacquisitionrequiresspecializedelectronicsand
a magnetically shielded room.
MEG offers advantages over electroencephalography
(eeG)inthatitprovidesforeasyacquisitionofvery-high-
density(approximately100-300channels)wideband(DC
–2000Hz)recordingsofcurrentswithinthebrainand
with high dynamic range. Magnetic fields, in contrast to
scalp potentials, suffer minimal attenuation and distor-
tion from the various tissues that the electrical currents
have to cross to reach the scalp surface. Whereas more
frequentlyusedfunctionalimagingmodalities(fMRI,
SPECT and PET) have poor temporal resolution, MEG
records activity in real time with excellent temporal reso-
lution (< 1 ms). Single focal sources can be localized with
goodresolution(1-5mm).
How MEG is used
MeGisfrequentlyusedtohelplocalizeseizuresin
patients with intractable epilepsy as well as to examine
neurophysiological responses (evoked magnetic fields)
tovisual,auditoryandtactilestimuli.AfteraMeGstudy
has been obtained, the information is processed to allow
determination of dipoles that indicate the area in which
the activity (or the highest amount of activity) is occur-
ring. The analyst uses coregistration software to localize
thedipoleonthepatient’sMRI.Theresultisanimage
that identifies the areas (in the case of epilepsy) where
spikes or asynchronous activity were observed during
MeGacquisition(figure1).
The MEG lab at Cleveland Clinic has obtained MEG studies
fromalmost700patientssinceitsinceptionin2008.Our
ongoing research involving MEG is examining language
lateralization, the use of MEG with neurosurgical mapping
techniquestohelplocalizeepileptogeniczonesinpatients
with medically intractable epilepsy, and the development
of algorithms to improve the information obtained.
neurophysiological Responses to Stimuli
Inthecaseofneurophysiologicalresponsestostimuli,
many studies have examined the median nerve response
to electrical stimulation. This research has determined
that different patient populations may respond more
slowly than control subjects due to changes in conduc-
tivitycausedbythediseaseprocess.Otherstudieshave
determined that age is a significant mediating factor to
beconsideredwhenanalyzingMeGresults.Otherfactors
to consider when using MEG include medications the
subject is taking and, in some cases, the subject’s height,
Magnetoencephalography Provides new Window into Brain Connectivity Across Diverse neuropsychiatric Conditions
By Patricia Klaas, PhD, and John C. Mosher, PhD
F u n C t i o n A l i M A G i n G i n n E u R o P S y C H i A t R y
KEy PointS
Meg enables examination of changes in brain activ-ity with greater temporal and spatial resolution than is possible with traditional brain-mapping and imaging modalities.
Meg is increasingly being used in research examining brain connectivity in diverse disease states ranging from depression to schizophrenia to autism.
Cleveland Clinic has one of the most clinically prolific Meg laboratories in the united States and is pursuing research with Meg in multiple applications.
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is useful in a number of patient populations to identify pathways of connectivity
in the brain so that we can better understand why things go wrong when they go wrong. Cleveland Clinic has one
of the most clinically prolific MEG laboratories in the United States and is researching MEG’s use for a number of
applications. this article reviews MEG’s emerging utility for examining brain connectivity across various neuro-
psychiatric conditions.
12 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
F u n C t i o n A l i M A G i n G i n n E u R o P S y C H i A t R y
as taller individuals have longer latencies to median
nerve stimulation due to the necessarily longer path to
thecortex.figure2depictsthemediannerveresponse,
as determined by MEG after processing of the evoked
magneticfield,inthepre-andpostcentralcortexat36
ms. Patients with intractable epilepsy show a great deal
of variability in their response to this stimulation.
Psychiatric Applications
OtherresearchhasusedMeGtoassesspre-attentive
dysfunction in bipolar disorder and has determined
that at the pre-attentive level, information processing is
impaired in patients with bipolar disorder.1 MEG also
enables analysis of temporal correlations or coherence
within a number of populations. Clinical research has
examined neural coherence in dementia and band-
width differences in patients with schizophrenia, and
other studies have sought to develop a neural marker in
patients with depression to help distinguish them from
patients with bipolar disorder. Patients with autism
have been studied to determine whether MEG can help
identify a neural marker2 or if differences exist in connec-
tivity. Studies in connectivity, like the one conducted by
Hinkley et al, have examined the role of corpus callosum
development “in integrating information and mediating
complex behaviors.”3
MeGisanextremelyusefultechniquethatisbeingused
morefrequentlyinresearchexaminingbrainconnectiv-
ityinpopulationswithdepression,Alzheimerdisease,
Parkinson disease, schizophrenia, leukemia, multiple
sclerosisandmanyotherdiseases.Itshightemporaland
spatial resolution allows for examination of changes in
brainactivitywithgreatertemporalresolutionthanfMRI
and greater spatial resolution than EEG. n
RefeReNCeS
1.TakeiY,KumanoS,MakiY,etal.Preattentivedysfunc-tion in bipolar disorder: a MEG study using auditory mismatch negativity. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry.2010;34:903-912.
2.WilliamsMA,SachdevPS.Magnetoencephalographyinneuropsychiatry: ready for application? Curr Opin Psychiatry.2010;23:273-277.
3.HinkleyLBN,MarcoeJ,findlayAM,etal.Theroleofcorpus callosum development in functional connectivity and cognitive processing. PLoS One.2012;7(8):e39804.
Dr. Klaas is an associate staff member in Cleveland Clinic’s
Center for Behavioral Health and Department of Psychiatry
and Psychology. She also has appointments in Cleveland
Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, the Epilepsy
Center and the Department of Neurosciences. Her specialty
interests include epilepsy, magnetoencephalography, neu-
ropsychology and behavior research. She can be reached at
216.444.2450 or [email protected].
Dr. Mosher is a staff member in Cleveland Clinic’s Epilepsy
Center whose specialty interests include magnetoen-
cephalography. He can be contacted at 216.444.3379 or
Figure 1. MEG-enabled dipole localization on MRI demonstrating epileptogenicity (yellow markers).
Figure 2. Activity in the pre- and postcentral cortex, as determined by MEG after processing of the evoked magnetic field, following median nerve stimulation.
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 13
Abstinence-Based Models: the Acute Approach
Most abstinence-based approaches to opiate dependence
presume that patients should enter into residential treat-
ment, where they will be weaned off narcotics during the
“detox” phase of treatment and then spend a few more
weeks in a rehabilitation program. Such programs typi-
callyembracea12-step-basedapproachtoaddressingthe
issues underlying the patient’s addiction.
Abstinence-basedaddictionrehabilitationcenters
abound in the United States and remain the predomi-
nant modality of treatment despite taking an acute-care
approach to what is well recognized as a chronic disease.
Patients who enter such programs are expected to go
away to treatment (usually outside their geographic area)
for approximately four weeks and then return home,
freeofdrugsanddeemed“inrecovery.”Ifsuchapatient
subsequentlyhasanyexacerbationofhisorherchronic
disease that leads to use of drugs — even on a single occa-
sion — the patient is considered a “treatment failure.”
traditional MAt Programs: Effective but impractical
MATprogramsthatusemethadoneastheirmaintenance
medicationarerequiredtobefederallylicensed.federal
restrictions on methadone programs limit their avail-
ability, and most moderately sized metropolitan areas
have only one or two such programs. Patients in these
programs must initially go to the methadone clinic every
day to receive their dose of medication, which presents a
major inconvenience if they have transportation issues or
are trying to reintegrate into the workforce. Many, if not
most, of these clinics are located in crime-afflicted areas,
and savvy drug dealers often loiter around the clinics to
entice patients to abandon recovery and buy their illicit
drugs.Itisnosurprisethat,despitemethadoneclinics’
A D D i C t i o n M E D i C i n E
proven efficacy, it is difficult to sell patients on the idea
of engaging in long-term treatment at these clinics.
MATprogramsthatuseSuboxoneasamaintenance
medication are typically run out of outpatient physician
offices — often in primary care settings, where Suboxone
is provided as a service to opiate-dependent patients by
doctorswhoarenotaddictionologists.AlthoughSuboxone
programs are typically not managed by addiction special-
ists, it is hard to argue with their effectiveness, which
closely parallels that seen with methadone maintenance.
A nontraditional Evidence-Based Approach that Works
ClevelandClinic’sADRChasbeeninexistencefornearly
30yearsandhasarichhistoryoftakingevidence-based
approaches to address the complex issues often inherent
in the treatment of patients suffering from addiction.
OuroutcomeswithSuboxonehaveconsistentlyexceeded
those reported with traditional office-based programs.
For instance, prospective follow-up data from patients
startedonSuboxoneinApril2012thatlookedatnegative
urine drug screens and treatment retention at three and
sixmonthsshowedthatpatientstreatedattheADRChad
outcomes superior to those reported in the literature by
other respected programs2 (Figure 1).
Combined Approach Drives Success
Ourprogram’ssuccessisdrivenbyacombinedapproach
to treatment: We are neither a traditional residential
program nor a typical office-based provider of Suboxone.
We provide inpatient services for those in need of detoxi-
fication,primarilyfromalcoholand/orbenzodiazepines.
Patients who have undergone detoxification or are start-
ing Suboxone typically begin the next phase of treatment
in our partial hospitalization program (PHP), where they
Medication-Assisted treatment with Suboxone: finding Success with a nontraditional Approach to opiate Dependence
By Jason M. Jerry, MD
opiate dependence is a chronic relapsing and remitting illness — few experts will argue this fact. the body of evi-
dence shows that chronic approaches to opiate dependence, such as medication-assisted treatment (MAt) with either
methadone or Suboxone® (buprenorphine-naloxone), are superior to acute-care models that involve detoxification and
residential treatment.1 Yet the addiction treatment field has long been polarized over whether to pursue abstinence-
based approaches or MAt. At Cleveland Clinic’s Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center (ADRC), we believe a fresh
approach to this question is long overdue. A “one size fits all” strategy cannot be employed in real-world clinical set-
tings to effect long-lasting change.
14 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
A D D i C t i o n M E D i C i n E
engagein12-step-basedtreatmentfivedaysaweek.On
completion of the PHP, patients transition into one of
three intensive outpatient programs.
Close monitoring of patients, especially during the criti-
calfirst90days,alsocontributestoimprovedoutcomes.
Patientsarerequiredtoprovideweeklyurinesamples
and are given only one-week prescriptions for Suboxone
throughout their first three months in treatment. Patients
who struggle in treatment are typically moved to a higher
level of care that may involve staying at a local halfway
house if they wish to continue in our program.
Ourprogramsarestaffedbythreeboard-certifiedpsychi-
atrists who are certified medical review officers and also
board-certified in either addiction medicine or addiction
psychiatry. Such heavy staffing in psychiatry allows us to
attend to the psychiatric comorbidities that so commonly
plague those suffering from addictive disorders.
AttheADRC,weprideourselvesondevelopingtreatment
plans for our patients that are consistent with the
evidence base yet tailored to patients’ idiosyncrasies.
The validity of our approach is evidenced by our
outcomes measures, the fact that our program has
thrivedfornearly30years,andthestrongsupportof
alumni who volunteer their time to help those just
entering treatment. n
RefeReNCeS
1.JerryJM,CollinsGB.Medication-assistedtreatmentofopiate dependence is gaining favor. Cleve Clin J Med. 2013;80:345-349.
2.SoeffingJM,MartinDL,fingerhoodMI,etal.Buprenor-phine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year. J Subst Abuse Treat.2009;37:426-430.
Dr. Jerry is a staff psychiatrist in Cleveland Clinic’s Alcohol
and Drug Recovery Center and Clinical Assistant Professor
of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.
His specialty interests include drug and alcohol addiction,
with a focus on novel substances of abuse including synthet-
ic legal intoxicating drugs (“bath salts,” “spice/K2,” phenaz-
epam, etc.). He also works with professional athletes and is
an approved provider for the NBA-NBA Players Association
Anti-Drug Program. He can be reached at 216.363.2357 or
KEy PointS
evidence shows that chronic approaches to opiate dependence are superior to acute-care models, but debate surrounds whether to pursue abstinence-based approaches or medication-assisted treatment (MAt).
Abstinence-based models are limited by taking an acute-care approach to a chronic disease, while tradi-tional MAt programs can be impractical to run or often are not managed by addictionologists.
using a combined approach that draws on elements of Suboxone-based MAt and inpatient services, Cleveland Clinic’s Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center achieves patient outcomes that consistently exceed those reported with office-based MAT.
Neg
ativ
e ur
ine
drug
scr
eens
(%
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Negative Urine Drug Screen RateDuring First Six Months of Treatment
84
70
Cleveland ClinicADRC
(N = 87)
Soeffinget al2
Figure 1. Rates of negative urine drug screens among participants in Cleveland Clinic’s Alcohol and Drug Recovery Center (ADRC) compare favorably with some of the best rates reported in the literature.
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 15
B R A i n S t i M u l A t i o n i n n E u R o P S y C H i A t R i C D i S E A S E B R A i n S t i M u l A t i o n i n n E u R o P S y C H i A t R i C D i S E A S E
Development of Innovative technologies for Brain Stimulation: going Microscopic to overcome earlier Limitations
By John T. Gale, PhD
Despite the success of these technologies, a few techni-
cal and practical limitations have impeded our ability to
take advantage of their full potential. To overcome these
limitations, researchers in Cleveland Clinic’s Department
ofNeurosciences,inassociationwiththeDepartment
of Psychiatry and Psychology, are evaluating a new brain
stimulation technology called microscopic magnetic stim-
ulation(µMS).Ourfindingsthusfarprovidearationalefor
further exploration of µMS as a prospective therapeutic
tool with both preclinical and clinical applications.
Microscopic Magnetic Stimulation: How it Works
This new µMS technology involves the use of millimeter-
to submillimeter-sized coils (Figure 1, left), which avoid
the metal contact needed to modulate brain activity with
electricalstimulationmodalities.Incontrasttothecoils
used in TMS, µMS coils’ small size allows them to be
implanted directly into the brain or in close proximity to
thebrainsurface.Onceimplanted,coilscanbesupplied
with electrical current via implanted impulse genera-
tors, similar to those used for cardiac pacemakers. When
current is applied to a coil, a magnetic field is generated
around the coil (Figure 1, right) that penetrates into the
tissue.Asthemagneticfieldspreads,itcausesachange
in electrical charge around the brain tissue that can
make brain cells change their activities.
induction Coil is not in Contact with Brain tissue
OneofthepotentialusesofµMSistoimprovedelivery
of stimulation to the brain. The principal problem with
standardtechniquessuchasdeepbrainstimulation(DBS)
is that the metal stimulation conductor comes into direct
contact with brain tissue. This interface induces a neuro-
inflammatory response and promotes scarring at the
electrode contacts, which can affect charge densities at the
stimulation site and possibly reduce therapeutic efficacy.
Onewaytoovercomethereductioninchargedensitiesis
simply to increase the amplitude of stimulation.2 However,
increasing stimulation amplitudes might result in
inadvertent activation of surrounding structures, which
can lead to stimulation side effects. Two such side effects
are paresthesias and diplopia, secondary to inadvertent
activation of the medial lemniscus and corticobulbar
fibers, respectively.3
Inadditiontothesepotentialinflammatorycomplica-
tions,performingMRIproceduresonpatientswith
implanted DBS leads calls for specific precautions.
Reports indicate that heating of the leads may cause
tissuedamage.Asisthecasewithinflammatorypro-
cesses, heating occurs as a result of the direct interface
between the stimulation contact and the brain tissue.
Specifically, the cabling of the DBS lead can absorb
radiofrequencyenergyproducedbytheMRIscanner
and transfer this energy (in the form of heat) to the
brain at the site of the leads.4,5
Electrical stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have proved to be beneficial for patients with certain
neurologic disorders, including Parkinson disease, essential tremor and dystonia. these treatments are also being ex-
plored as a surgical option for patients with neuropsychiatric conditions such as major depression and obsessive-com-
pulsive disorder.1
KEy PointS
Current brain stimulation modalities present possible surgical options for neuropsychiatric conditions such as major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder, but technical and practical limitations impede their use at full potential.
A new brain stimulation technology called microscopic magnetic stimulation (µMS) overcomes many of these limitations through use of tiny coils that do not directly contact brain tissue.
Our research group was the first to demonstrate that µMS is capable of activating neuronal circuitry on the systems level, which is an important step toward clini-cal use.
16 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
B R A i n S t i M u l A t i o n i n n E u R o P S y C H i A t R i C D i S E A S E
Incontrast,µMSovercomestheselimitationsbykeeping
the induction coil out of direct contact with the target
tissue. The coil can be enclosed in a biocompatible
coating (such as parylene), which mitigates both the
inflammatoryprocessesandpotentialMRIhazards.In
addition, due to inherent properties of magnetic field
spread, it may be possible to shape the spread of the neu-
ronal activation field to prevent unintended activation of
adjacent brain structures, thus limiting side effects.
tiny Size Allows for implant Flexibility
Althoughdirectelectricalstimulation(stimulationofthe
brain through the scalp) and TMS offer advantages over
invasive technologies, they have limited applications.
Specifically,bothtechnologiesrequireprecisecontact
placement in order to modulate specific brain regions.
Therefore, highly trained personnel are needed to ensure
that contacts are appropriately positioned to maximize
outcomes.Inaddition,TMSrequireslargepowersources
to drive the magnetic fields because the coils are large
andsituatedfarfromthestimulatedtissues.Asaresult,
TMStherapyrequiresthatpatientsmakerepeatedoffice
visits to receive treatment. Together, these drawbacks
limit the feasibility of long-term neuroprosthetic applica-
tions, reducing both their efficacy and accessibility.
Incontrast,thesmallsizeofµMScoilsenablesneurosur-
geons to implant them close to (either within or adjacent
to)thespecificbraintargets.Also,theµMSdevicesuse
farlessenergythandotheTMSdevices.Anotherareain
which µMS has proved effective is in activating the local
neural circuitry of the retina in vitro.6
First in Vivo Evidence of trans-Synaptic neuronal Activation
Inourcurrentstudies,wehavedemonstratedthatµMS
technology is capable of activating neuronal circuitry on
the systems level with use of an in vivo rodent prepara-
tion. Specifically, µMS of the dorsal cochlear nucleus
activatesneuronsoftheinferiorcolliculus(figure2,
top).Additionally,wehavedemonstratedtheefficacyand
characteristics of trans-synaptic activation using differ-
ent amplitudes of stimulation, where higher amplitudes
reduce latencies and decrease variability. These findings
represent an important step toward clinical use, as they
are the first to demonstrate that µMS is capable of trans-
synaptic neuronal activation in vivo.
Computer Simulations of µMS
Inadditionalstudies,weareexaminingandoptimizing
the design of µMS technologies using computer simula-
tions(figure2,bottom).Thesesimulationsallowusto
Figure 1. (Left) Depiction of the size of a µMS coil relative to that of an overlaid human hair. The dimensions of the microcoils illustrated are 1160 × 1120 × 860 µm (0603LS-103XJLB; Coilcraft Inc.; Cary, Ill.). (Right) Schematic of magnetic fields generated by application of electric current to a magnetic coil.
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 17
B R A i n S t i M u l A t i o n i n n E u R o P S y C H i A t R i C D i S E A S E
predict how different designs of µMS technologies will
function prior to their manufacture. This enables us to
design µMS coils with particular shape and size speci-
fications and then test these designs using a computer,
thereby allowing us to commit resources to only the most
promising designs.
other Applications
While this article is focused on the possibility of µMS as
an alternative to DBS, µMS may be useful for a number
of other applications — such as in cochlear, visual and
muscular prosthetic contexts — although these possibili-
ties remain to be tested. We look forward to contributing
to such investigations, as well as to exploring the use of
µMS as a potential tool for investigating the mechanisms
thatunderlieelectricaland/ortranscranialmagnetic
stimulation.7 n
RefeReNCeS
1. BourneSK,eckhardtCA,ShethSA,eskandareN.Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation for obsessive compulsive disorder: effects upon cells and circuits. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012;6:29.
2.ButsonCR,MaksCB,McIntyreCC.Sourcesandeffectsof electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol.2006;117(2):447-454.
3. StarrPA,ChristineCW,TheodosopoulosPV,etal.Implantationofdeepbrainstimulatorsintothesubthalamic nucleus: technical approach and magnetic resonance imaging-verified lead locations. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(2):370-387.
4. AngeloneLM,PotthastA,Segonnef,etal.MetallicelectrodesandleadsinsimultaneouseeG-MRI:specificabsorptionrate(SAR)simulationstudies.Bioelectromag-netics.2004;25(4):285-295.
5. RezaiAR,PhillipsM,BakerKB,etal.Neurostimulationsystem used for deep brain stimulation (DBS): MR safety issues and implications of failing to follow safety recommendations. Invest Radiol. 2004;39(5):300-303.
6.BonmassarG,LeeSW,freemanDK,PolasekM,friedSI,GaleJT.Microscopicmagneticstimulationofneuraltissue. Nat Commun. 2012;3:921.
7. MuggletonN,WalshV.Smallermagnetsforsmarterminds? Trends Cogn Sci.2012;16(9):452-453.
Dr. Gale is an assistant staff member in Cleveland Clinic’s
Center for Neurological Restoration and Department
of Neurosciences. He can be reached at 216.444.9097 or
Figure 2. (Top) Plot of evoked neuronal response to µMS. The plot illustrates overlaid electrophysiologic activity from the inferior colliculus in response to 240 magnetic pulses delivered in the vicinity of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. As shown here, the pulses generated a highly stereotypic artifact (t = 0) and a robust multi-unit response (t = 7 ms). The microcoils used were 21-turn inductors measur-ing 400 × 400 × 600 µm (ELJ-RFR10JFB; Panasonic Electronic Devices Corp. of America; Knoxville, Tenn.). (Bottom) Computer simulation of magnetically induced electrical fields generated during µMS stimulation pulse.
18 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
i n t E n S i V E o u t P A t i E n t t H E R A P y
integrated Skills Approach
We employ an integrated skill-building strategy that
uses cognitive behavioral and dialectical behavioral
approaches to develop the following skills:
• Strategiesforchangingthoughts,feelingsandbehaviors
• Mindfulness
• Copingcapacities
• emotionalregulation
• Realityacceptance
• Crisiscoping
• Interpersonalcommunication
PatientengagementisacornerstoneofourIOPapproach.
Afteraninitialcomprehensivepsychosocialassessment
to determine the patient’s personal goals, we engage the
patient in an ongoing collaborative treatment planning
process. Patient feedback is solicited every day on the
benefit of skills taught, the practical application of skills
to daily living, perceived progress toward goals and any
additional patient needs.
Swift Access, open-Ended Aftercare
AlthoughIOPserviceshavebeenavailableatCleveland
Clinic for more than two decades, we have made it a point
to evolve the program according to patient needs, new
evidence and emerging best practices. Recent changes
thatdistinguishourIOPinclude:
• Dedicationofanindependentlylicensedprofessional
counselor whose exclusive role is to provide liaison
serviceforassessmentofreferralstotheIOP.Theresult
is same-day or next-day access to assessment and admis-
sion for most patients.
• AdditionoftheIOPtoourpsychiatryresidents’rotations
to enhance these trainees’ exposure to management
issuesrelevanttotheIOPanditspatientpopulation.
This finding is from the first five months of outcomes
trackingfortheIOP—comprehensivedatacollection
that was made possible by recent standardization of
treatment and processes across all locations where the
IOPisavailableintheClevelandClinichealthsystem.
ioP at a Glance
TheIOP,whichisoperatedbyClevelandClinic’sCenter
for Behavioral Health, is designed to treat adults with
mood or anxiety disorders in a group therapy setting.
Appropriatepatientsarethosewhoarecapableoffunc-
tioning in their daily lives but who stand to benefit from
more concentrated services than those available from
weekly therapy sessions.
The program is offered three or four days a week and
requiresattendanceingrouptherapyforthreeandahalf
hourseachday.Atreatmentcoursegenerallylastsfour
to six weeks but may be shortened or extended based on
patients’ individual needs and assessment results. Group
sizegenerallyrangesfromeightto12patients.
Program goals include helping patients (1) reduce
moodandanxietydisordersymptoms,(2)regainlost
confidence and (3) achieve greater levels of functioning,
such as returning to work, resuming daily activities and
becoming a contributing member of their family.
The program is run by licensed independent social
workers, counselors and psychiatric nurses in consulta-
tionwithastaffpsychologist.frequentcommunications
with referring providers, including regular patient prog-
ress reports, are a program priority and recognized as
essential to long-term patient success.
outcomes Collection effort Showcases value of an evolving Intensive outpatient Program
By Daniel Jones, PhD
Recent participants in Cleveland Clinic’s intensive outpatient program (ioP) for mood and anxiety disorders demon-
strated an average improvement of more than 2.5 points on the 7-point Clinical Global impression Severity of illness
Scale (CGi).
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 19
P S y C H i A t R y E D u C A t i o ni n t E n S i V E o u t P A t i E n t t H E R A P y
• Provisionofanaftercaregroupcomponenttohelp
patients reinforce and maintain changes they adopted
during therapy. Patients are free to attend this compo-
nent for as long as they wish after completion of the core
program;patientstypicallycontinueforapproximately
three months.
The aftercare component is aligned with the “relapse
prevention contract” we have long asked patients to sign
upondischargefromtheIOP.Thiscontractconfirmsthat
patients understand their illness, recognize its signs and
symptoms, and designate a family member they will turn
toforassistanceasneeded.Similarly,theIOPincludesa
family support group to discuss strategies for relapse pre-
vention and improved communication within the family.
initial outcomes tracking, Future Steps
TheseandotherIOPfeatureswerestandardizedacross
ClevelandClinicin2012,whichpromptedtheongoing
collectionofoutcomesdataforallIOPparticipants.
Asillustratedinfigure1,the63participantsinthe
IOPfromlateJulythroughDecember2012experienced
animprovementinmeanCGIscorefrom5.46attheir
initial assessment for the program (indicating markedly
severeillness)to2.80atprogramdischarge(indicating
mild illness).
Wecontinuetoconductpre-andpost-programCGI
assessments and will report participants’ outcomes
on an annual basis moving forward. Cleveland Clinic
recentlyjoinedtheAssociationforAmbulatoryBehavioral
Healthcare and looks forward to opportunities to share
outcomesdataandotherwiseadvanceIOPcareona
national basis through that and other forums. n
Dr. Jones is a psychologist in the Department of Psychiatry
and Psychology and Director of the Intensive Outpatient
Programs in Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Behavioral
Health. His specialty interests include adult psychotherapy
and relational and integrative approaches to psycho-
therapy for depression and anxiety. He can be reached at
216.587.8373 or [email protected].
KEy PointS
Cleveland Clinic has begun collecting and reporting out-comes of all patients completing its intensive outpatient program (IoP) for comprehensive management of mood and anxiety disorders.
Among the 63 participants in the IOP during the first five months of outcomes collection, mean CGI score improved from 5.46 at initial assessment (indicating markedly severe illness) to 2.80 at discharge from the program (indicating mild illness).
the Cleveland Clinic IoP features open-ended aftergroup care and virtually immediate access through use of a dedicated licensed professional counselor for assess-ment of referrals.
Mea
n C
GI s
core
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Illness Severity Before and After Intensive Outpatient Program (N = 63)
Initial assessment Follow-up assessment
Figure 1. Mean group CGI score improved from 5.46 (indicating marked illness) at initial assessment for the intensive outpatient program (IOP) to 2.80 (indicating mild illness) at program completion (P < .0001) among 63 IOP participants in the first five months of IOP outcomes tracking. The CGI (Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness Scale) is a 7-point scale.
20 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
P S y C H i A t R y E D u C A t i o n
AllstudentscompletedtheNationalBoardofMedical
examiners(NBMe)psychiatrytestattheendoftheir
four-week psychiatry rotation as an objective and
validated measure. They were also asked to assess their
confidence in their clinical note writing and oral presen-
tation skills as well as their opinions about use of the
EMR in medical education.
Call for a Hybrid template
TherewasnodifferenceinNBMetestscoresbetweenthe
two groups. Students’ subjective comments revealed that
thesmarttemplatewasviewedasenablingquickwriting
of patient notes but that the bare-bones template was
perceived as better suited to learning correct preparation
of medical documentation.
The most striking finding was that students appreciated
the use of pre-populated drop-down menus for learning
clerkship-specific material, particularly the terminology
ofpsychiatry.Overall,studentsexpressedapreferencefor
a hybrid template that utilizes some smart functions but
also allows for creation of free-form text.
Do Documentation templates impact training?
Today’s highly structured “smart” EMR documentation
templates automatically import patient health informa-
tion, utilize hundreds of boilerplate text options and
rely on layers of drop-down menu choices. These smart
templates can improve clinical efficiency, but they de-
emphasizethecreationoffree-formtext.AleadingeMR
system with such documentation templates, Epic, is used
by medical students, residents, fellows and attending
physicians at Cleveland Clinic and elsewhere.
Despite the many merits of these documentation tem-
plates, it was unclear to us whether they are ideally suited
for training medical students to document a thorough
history and exam, prepare a differential diagnosis, and
formulate a comprehensive assessment. These are skills
we believe every student should master by the end of his
or her training. The medical literature provides little
guidance on this topic, so we decided to study it ourselves
among third-year medical students from the Cleveland
Clinic Lerner College of Medicine and Case Western
Reserve University during their psychiatry clerkship at
Cleveland Clinic.
test of two templates
ThestudyranfromOctober2011throughDecember
2012andcomparedahighlystructuredsmarttemplate,
whichdidnotrequiremuchdenovoinformationentry,
with a bare-bones template that included only standing
headings (such as chief complaint, history of present
illness,pastmedicalhistory,etc.)andrequiredmuch
more information entry. Sixty-two medical students were
randomized to use either the bare-bones template or the
smart template for each new patient they saw during their
two-week consultation-liaison psychiatry rotation.
Medical Students and the eMR: Improving the educational experience by tailoring templates
By Margo C. Funk, MD
use of the electronic medical record (EMR) is fast becoming standard practice, yet medical students typically do not
have the option of using an EMR documentation template that has been tailored for their training. Within Cleveland
Clinic’s Section of Consultation-liaison Psychiatry, we have developed a documentation template that helps medical
students learn psychiatric content and terminology while still fostering independent and critical thinking.
It was unclear whether standard
templates were well suited to train
students to document a thorough
history and exam, prepare a differ-
ential diagnosis, and formulate a
comprehensive assessment.
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 21
P S y C H i A t R y E D u C A t i o n
Figure 1. Examples of the hybrid documentation template we’ve developed with detailed drop-down menus as well as areas for free-form text, which are indicated by strings of asterisks (***). Panel A shows the “psychiatric review of systems” menu for depression. Panel B shows the same menu for post-traumatic stress disorder, here highlighting a second level of drop-down menu if the student chooses “re-experiencing of trauma.” Panels A and B both highlight the expectation that the student manually creates text for “chief complaint,” “history of present illness (HPI),” “past psychiatric history,” etc. These sections are not auto-populated with information saved in the chart. Panel C shows a nearly completed mental status exam, highlighting use of a drop-down menu for “thought process.”
P S y C H i A t R y E D u C A t i o n
A
B
C
22 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
the EMR as a teaching tool
This study suggests that the EMR documentation
template has strong potential for use as a teach-
ing tool. To provide our medical students with the
richest educational opportunity, we in the Section
of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry have developed a
template specifically for medical student use (Figure
1). Much of it consists of headings and subheadings,
but drop-down menus are provided in areas where
we believe students would benefit from exposure to
more psychiatry-specific content, particularly in the
psychiatric review of systems and the mental status
examination. Rather than viewing drop-down menu
choices as shortcuts, students find them useful as a way
to learn more content and consider all relevant pos-
sibilities when describing psychiatric symptoms and a
patient’s mental status.
Different needs at Different Stages of training
Unlike residents and attending physicians, medical
students are at the beginning of their medical training
and are focused primarily on learning a core set of
skills.Incontrast,residentshavealreadylearnedcore
content and are adjusting to medical practice and effi-
ciency.Itfollowsthatthesegroupshavedifferentneeds
when preparing a medical record and that the template
they use should reflect those differences.
The findings from our psychiatry service are likely
to be relevant for other departments and specialties.
Establishing an EMR template tailored to medical stu-
dents for every service in a hospital would provide an ideal
teachingopportunity,althoughitwouldofcourserequire
effort from educators and clerkship directors. But the
eMRisheretostay,andIchallengemycolleaguesinpsy-
chiatry and other disciplines to consider how a medical
student-tailored documentation template might fit into
theireMRsystems.Ourstudyconfirmsthatinclusionof
such a template is worth the effort in terms of enhancing
preparation of the next generation of physicians. n
Dr. Funk is a consultation-liaison psychiatrist in Cleveland
Clinic’s Center for Behavioral Health, Assistant Professor of
Medicine in the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medi-
cine (CCLCM), Discipline Leader for the CCLCM Psychiatry
Clerkship and Associate Training Director for the Adult
Psychiatry Residency Program. Her specialty interests
include psychiatric management of patients with cardiac
illness, trauma-related disorders, and medical student and
resident education. She can be reached at 216.444.5425 or
P S y C H i A t R y E D u C A t i o n
The EMR is here to stay, so I chal-
lenge my colleagues to consider
how a medical student-tailored
documentation template might fit
into their EMR systems. Our study
confirms that it is worth the effort.
KEy PointS
Although use of the eMR and ”smart” documentation templates are quickly becoming standard practice, templates tailored to the needs of medical students are generally not available.
our study among medical students during their psychia-try clerkship found that they believe they’d learn best from a hybrid documentation template that includes drop-down menus and areas for free-form text.
Student-tailored eMR documentation templates should be considered for all hospital departments responsible for instructing medical students.
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 23
early Intensive Behavioral Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorders Maximizes Mainstream educational Placements
By Thomas W. Frazier II, PhD
the Early Childhood Program within Cleveland Clinic Children’s Center for Autism provides intensive applied behavior
analysis services to children 18 months to 6 years old. these services allow a majority of children who exit the
program to transition to a less intensive educational placement.
The Early Childhood Program, which is also part of the
ClevelandClinicLernerSchoolforAutismforschool-age
children, provides early, intensive behavioral interven-
tion year-round to young children who are diagnosed
withautismspectrumdisorders.Childrenreceive30or
more hours per week of intervention through part-
nership between the education team and the child’s
parents/guardians.
Utilizing the science of applied behavior analysis
and child development principles, an individualized
curriculum is designed to teach communication,
social interaction, play, and a range of functional
and adaptive skills.
improving Mainstream Placements
Sincetheprogramopenedin2002,101studentshave
graduated. The majority of children who have exited
the Early Childhood Program over the past decade have
moved on to mainstream placements with minimal or
no educational supports needed (39 percent) or to less
intensivespecialeducationplacements(26percent)that
donotrequireintensivebehavioralintervention(figure
1).Aminorityofstudents(35percent)continuetoneed
intensive behavioral intervention.
Asacomparison,previousstudiesofintensivebehavioral
intervention programs for preschoolers have found rates of
minimal-supportplacementsofapproximately30percent.
KEy PointS
outcomes from the Center for Autism’s early Childhood Program indicate that young children with autism who attend the program experience substantial improve-ments in their ability to function independently in their future educational placements.
Over the past five years, an increasing percentage of preschoolers have exited to less intensive placements where intensive behavioral intervention is no longer required for student success.
Better language at program entry and larger gains in language early in treatment nearly perfectly predicted more favorable placement at exit.
A student in the Early Childhood Program works 1-to-1 with a behavior therapist during a group art project. Each student works on individual-ized goals that are developed based on his or her abilities and needs.
P E D i A t R i C B E H A V i o R A l H E A l t H
24 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
Perc
enta
ge o
f pre
scho
ol s
tude
nts
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Early Childhood Program Placement Outcomes
Minimal educational support
placement
Less intensive educational support
placement
Intensive behavioral intervention placement
39%
26%
35%
Figure 1. Cumulative Early Childhood Program placement outcomes, 2002 to 2012 (N = 101), show that a majority of graduates exited to less intensive educational placements that did not require intensive behavioral intervention.
Perc
enta
ge e
xitin
g to
le
ss in
tens
ive
supp
ort
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
Percentage of Students in the Early Childhood Program Exiting to Less Intensive Placement
20122011201020092008
57%58%
61%
64% 64%
Figure 2. A steady increase has been observed in the percentage of Early Childhood Program students who exit to educational placements where intensive behavioral intervention is no longer required for student success.
Overthepastfiveyears,anincreasingpercentageof
preschoolers have exited to settings where intensive
behavioralinterventionisnolongerrequiredforstudent
success(figure2).Theseplacementsincludemainstream
classrooms without any additional support or with either
pullout intervention (e.g., individualized instruction in
mathematics or reading) or an aide providing behavioral
and academic support as necessary. Higher baseline
language scores after six months of intervention nearly
perfectly predicted minimal-support placement at exit.
Early intervention Reduces Costs
These findings indicate that young children with autism
who attend the Early Childhood Program experience
substantial improvements in their ability to function
independently, resulting in decreased resource utiliza-
tion and cost to the public education system. n
SUGGeSTeDReADING
GranpeeshehD,TarboxJ,DixonDR.Appliedbehavioranalytic interventions for children with autism: a descrip-tion and review of treatment research. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2009;21:162-173.
DawsonG,RogersS,MunsonJ,etal.Randomizedcontrolled trial of an intervention for toddlers with autism: the Early Start Denver Model. Pediatrics.2009;125(1):17-23.
HowlinP,MagiatiI,CharmanT.Systematicreviewofearlyintensive behavior interventions for children with autism. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil.2009;114(1):23-41.
SmithT,BuchGA,GambyTe.Parent-directed,intensiveearly intervention for children with pervasive developmen-tal disorder. Res Dev Disabil.2000;21(4):297-309.
eikesethS,SmithT,Jahre,eledevikS.Intensivebehavioraltreatment at school for 4–7-year-old children with autism: a 1-year comparison controlled study. Behav Modif. 2002;26(1):49-68.
Dr. Frazier is a staff psychologist in Cleveland Clinic Chil-
dren’s Center for Pediatric Behavioral Health and Center
for Autism. His research interests include studies to better
understand autism symptoms and diagnosis, identification
of autism traits in unaffected relatives, and brain imaging
studies of autism. He can be reached at 216.448.6440 or
P E D i A t R i C B E H A V i o R A l H E A l t H
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 25
Hearts and Minds: offering Behavioral Health Services in a Cardiology Clinic to Boost Patients’ Spirits — and outcomes
By Leo Pozuelo, MD, and Leslie Cho, MD
Among the many factors to be considered in properly diagnosing and treating cardiovascular disease, the patient’s
mental health is perhaps the most overlooked. Cardiac events can be major sources of stress and anxiety, even after
they have been identified and abated.
Inmanycases,cardiaceventswillthrowpatientsfora
loop because these events represent an unexpected brush
withtheirmortality.Additionally,asubsetofpatients
who experience cardiac events have pre-existing depres-
sion or emotional issues that are exacerbated by the
ordeal of the cardiac event.
Despite traditional underappreciation of the impor-
tance of mental health in patients with heart disease,
cardiovascular medicine has progressed to the point
that patients’ emotional coping and wellness are now
increasingly managed along with their physical coping
and wellness.
Here at Cleveland Clinic, we operate a Cardiovascular
Behavioral Health Clinic in which behavioral health
services are located within the Section of Preventive
Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation in our Heart &
VascularInstitute.Theclinicservesasaconsultation
service available to the patient, the treating cardiologist
and the patient’s primary care physician. This design and
structuring of the clinic within our cardiology service
stem from evidence that such co-location of services
improves the overall outcomes of patients with cardiovas-
cular disease.
identifying the need
Aspartofthestandardintakeprocess,patientsin
preventive cardiology and those enrolled in the cardiac
rehabilitation program are evaluated to determine how
well they are coping emotionally in the wake of cardio-
vascular surgery or other potentially traumatic therapies.
Quality-of-lifescorescoupledwithscreeningquestions
on depression and anxiety help determine which patients
stand to benefit from the Cardiovascular Behavioral
Health Clinic.
Such patients often have one or more telltale characteris-
tics, such as difficulty adhering to regimens for doctor’s
appointments, medication-taking and wellness activities
as well as difficulties with mental energy and social or
workengagements.Atthatpoint,itisnolongersufficient
for a cardiologist to simply tell them they are fine. Quality
of life can clearly be affected by physical and emotional
issues, which are common in patients with heart disease.
There is a need for psychiatric intervention, given the prev-
alence of depression after life-changing cardiac events.
Three Major Benefits of a Combined Clinic
Co-location of behavioral health services within a
cardiology clinic promises to yield at least three major
benefits:
• Itvalidateswhatpatientsarealreadyfeeling,helping
them understand that the care team is as interested in
their emotional well-being as in their blood pressure or
cholesterol level.
• Itoffersamorecomprehensiveapproachtodisease,
with the goal of ensuring greater long-term wellness
for patients.
• Itoftencontributestoamorewide-rangingsetofrec-
ommendations for optimal treatment simply by dint of
having behavioral health services under the same roof
Patients who stand to benefit from
such a clinic often have difficulty
adhering to regimens for doctor’s
appointments, medication-taking
and wellness activities.
B E H A V i o R A l H E A l t H i n C A R D i o V A S C u l A R D i S E A S E
26 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
as cardiology services. This is particularly the case for
many elderly patients, who may not want to visit the
psychiatry building because they perceive psychiatric
care as carrying a stigma.
Promoting Resiliency
Althougheachcaseisunique,somegeneralapproaches
to behavioral healthcare are efficacious for many patients
with cardiovascular disease. Chief among them may be
the importance of working with patients to recognize
their strengths and resiliency and to identify steps that
have helped them through difficult times earlier in their
lives. Those types of conversations are time well spent,
as they often help patients understand that they are
equippedtodealwiththestressofheartdisease.
AcliniclikeourCardiovascularBehavioralHealthClinic
can facilitate such conversations and ultimately help
promotepatients’recoveryandimprovetheirquality
of life. n
Dr. Pozuelo leads the Cardiovascular Behavioral Health
Clinic. He is Section Head of Consultation-Liaison Psychia-
try and Vice Chair, Clinical, in the Department of Psychiatry
and Psychology. He can be reached at 216.444.3583 or
Dr. Cho is Section Head for Preventive Cardiology and
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Director of the Women’s Cardio-
vascular Center in Cleveland Clinic’s Heart & Vascular Insti-
tute. She can be reached at 216.445.6320 or [email protected].
KEy PointS
the importance of mental health to the outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease has traditionally been underappreciated, but that has started to change.
Cleveland Clinic operates a Cardiovascular Behavioral Health Clinic within a cardiology clinic to serve as a psychiatric consultation service to patients and their treating physicians.
The benefits of such a clinic include reassurance to patients that their providers care about their emotional well-being, a more comprehensive approach to heart disease and consideration of a wider range of treatment recommendations.
B E H A V i o R A l H E A l t H i n C A R D i o V A S C u l A R D i S E A S E
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 27
electroconvulsive therapy: underutilized Modality Can Be Safe, effective for Severe Mood Disorders in Adolescents
By Joseph Austerman, DO
Effective use of ECT has been demonstrated in adoles-
centssince1942.Yetdespitethelongevityofitsuseand
endorsementbytheAmericanAcademyofChildand
AdolescentPsychiatry,eCTremainshighlystigmatized
and misunderstood.
ECt Knowledge Gaps Persist
Even mental health professionals have knowledge gaps
abouttheuseofeCT.Inasurveyofchildpsychiatrists
andpsychologists,53.8percentreportedtheirknowledge
abouteCTtobeminimal,75percentsaidtheylacked
confidence in giving a second opinion about the treat-
mentmodalityand70percentregardeditasatreatment
of last resort.1
ECT also is not well understood by the public, and few
pediatricpatientsreceivethetreatment.Inastudyin
Switzerland,only1.2percentofarepresentativesample
ofthepublicwasinfavoroftheuseofeCT,and57percent
considered it a harmful treatment.2Inasurveyof113hos-
pitalsinAustralia,among7,469patientswhoreceived
eCT,only0.2percentwereyoungerthan18years.3
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECt) is a highly effective treatment modality for multiple psychiatric and medical illnesses.
Although commonly used in adults, this therapy is significantly underutilized in the adolescent population. Cleveland
Clinic is the only medical center in northeast ohio offering ECt for pediatric patients. the therapy is administered
here by a team of child and adolescent psychiatrists who are accredited in its use.
Determining Appropriate indications
The adult population is referred for ECT most often for
mood disorders, while adolescents are referred most
often for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders. This
contrasts with findings that the adolescent population
responds to ECT as well as, or even better than, the adult
population for mood disorders and psychosis, while
experiencing fewer or the same degree of side effects.
Substantial empirical evidence supports the benefit of
ECT in adolescents in severe, persistent mood disorders,
psychosis or catatonia. There also are multiple reports
demonstrating benefits for self-injurious behavior in
autistic spectrum disorders and Tourette syndrome.4
Aswithadults,eCTshouldbeconsideredinadoles-
cents when there are severe, persistent and significantly
disabling symptoms. Unless there is an urgent need,
such as the refusal to eat or drink, severe suicidality,
uncontrollable mania or florid psychosis, ECT should
be considered only after usual treatment modalities
havefailed.Thereshouldbeatleasttwoadequatetrials
of appropriate psychopharmacologic agents accompa-
nied by other appropriate treatment modalities such as
psychotherapy.2
Best Practices When Administering ECt
Adolescentpatientsshouldundergoafullpsychiatricand
medical evaluation in a standardized fashion when ECT
is being considered (Table 1).2 Collateral information
should be obtained from parents and treatment provid-
ers. Target symptoms should be assessed using reliable
rating instruments.
Before ECT is administered, a comprehensive physical
should be done that includes a complete blood cell count,
differential white blood cell count, thyroid function
test, liver function test, urinalysis and toxicology screen,
When considering ECT,
every patient should receive
an independent evaluation
from a psychiatrist who is
knowledgeable about ECT and
not directly responsible for
treatment of the patient.
A D o l E S C E n t P S y C H i A t R y
28 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
eCGandbrainCT.Aserumurinepregnancytestshould
beobtainedforfemales.Also,itisrecommendedthat
adolescents undergoing ECT have a memory assessment
before treatment. Permission must be obtained from the
parent/guardianandassentobtainedfromthechild.
When considering ECT, every patient should receive
an independent evaluation from a psychiatrist who is
knowledgeable about ECT and not directly responsible
for treatment of the patient. While supportive treat-
ment of adolescents should continue during the course
of ECT whenever possible, ECT should be administered
table 1. Recommended Assessment Protocol in Adolescents with Depression
Steps Actions/notes
Patient selection Symptoms are severe and persistent
failed at least two adequate antidepressant trials accompanied by other appropriate treatment modalities such as psychotherapy
Active suicidality, florid psychosis or life-threatening symptoms such as refusal to eat
Psychiatric assessment Detailed clinical interview incorporating past treatments
Reliable rating instruments administered
Second opinion obtained by a psychiatrist knowledgeable about eCt who is not treating the patient
Cognitive and memory assessment
Medical assessment Complete physical assessment
Laboratory data:• CBC with differential• Thyroid function test• Liver function test• Urinalysis and toxicology
Imaging:• ECG• EEG• CT
Anesthesia preoperative assessment
Consent Complete explanation of the procedure, risks, benefits and alternative treatments to both the patient and the parent/guardian
Monitoring Monitor patients during and after treatment until fully recovered from anesthesia
Monitoring should continue for at least 24 hours after the procedure
Cognitive assessment prior to acute eCt series, immediately after the acute series and three to six months after the acute series
Source: Based on recommendations in ghaziuddin et al2
without concurrent medications, as some psychotropic
medicationsmayaffectthequalityofeCTorconfera
neurocognitive risk with the concurrent use of ECT.2
low incidence of Side Effects
There are no absolute contraindications to the use
ofeCT;however,tumorsoftheCNSassociatedwith
increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure, active chest
infection or recent myocardial infarction are considered
relative contraindications.
A D o l E S C E n t P S y C H i A t R y
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264 29
AfewsideeffectsareassociatedwiththeuseofeCT,
the most common of which are transient: headaches,
delirium lasting less than one hour post-procedure,
hypomanic symptoms and memory loss. Cognitive
effects associated with ECT are comparable to those
in adults, and there are no data to support long-term
cognitive effects.
Oneraresideeffectmayincludetardiveseizuresarising
inthefirst20to48hoursaftereCTisadministered.This
effect was seen more often in those patients experiencing
aprolongedseizure(>180seconds).
Fatality is rare, with an overall fatality rate similar to
thatinadults(0.2per10,000).Theriskofanesthesiaand
complications is believed to be no greater than 1.1 per
10,000incidents,whichiscitedascomparabletotherate
for adults.2
Good Remission Rates in unipolar Depression
ECT in adolescents is most beneficial for the treatment
of severe mood symptoms, acute suicidality, catatonia
and psychosis. Some studies report a remission rate of
approximately60percentfortreatmentofrefractory
unipolar depression.3
AlthougheCTiscommonlymisunderstoodandstigma-
tized, it is a valid, safe and effective treatment modality
for adolescents suffering from mood or psychotic symp-
toms and should be considered as a rational treatment
option. n
RefeReNCeS
1. Shoirah H, Hamoda HM. Electroconvulsive therapy in children and adolescents. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(1):127-137.
2.GhaziuddinN,KutcherSP,KnappP,etal;fortheAACAPWorkGrouponQualityIssues.Practiceparameterforuse of electroconvulsive therapy with adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry.2004;43(12):1521-1539.
3.BlochY,Sobol,D,LevkovitzY,KronS,RatzoniG.Reasons for referral for electroconvulsive therapy: a comparison between adolescents and adults. Australas Psychiatry.2008;16(3):191-194.
4. Wachtel LE, Dhossche DM, Kellner CH. When is electroconvulsive therapy appropriate for children and adolescents? Med Hypotheses. 2011;76(3):395-399.
Dr. Austerman is a staff physician in Cleveland Clinic’s
Center for Pediatric Behavioral Health and Department of
Psychiatry and Psychology. He specializes in the acute care
of medically ill children who require hospitalization for
physical illnesses. He can be reached at 216.445.7656
KEy PointS
electroconvulsive therapy (eCt) is safe and effective for adolescents with severe, persistent and disabling mood disorders.
this treatment modality remains underutilized and mis-understood, preventing patients from receiving effective treatment.
It is important to follow standard guidelines and care paths when referring adolescents for eCt.
A D o l E S C E n t P S y C H i A t R y
30 inSiGHtS | 2013 CLeveL AnDCLInIC.oRg /PSYCHIAtRY
Donald A. Malone Jr., MD
Director, Center for Behavioral Health
Professor and Chairman, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology
Manish Aggarwal, MD
Veena Ahuja, MD
Amit Anand, MD
Kathleen Ashton, PhD
Joseph M. Austerman, Do
Florian Bahr, MD
Sarah Banks, PhD, ABPP-Cn
Joseph Baskin, MD
Scott Bea, PsyD
Aaron Bonner-Jackson, PhD
Adam Borland, PsyD
Minnie Bowers-Smith, MD
Susan Albers Bowling, PsyD
Robert Brauer, Do
Dana Brendza, PsyD
Karen Broer, PhD
Robyn Busch, PhD
Kathy Coffman, MD
Gregory Collins, MD
Edward Covington, MD
Horia Craciun, MD
Roman Dale, MD
Syma Dar, MD
Sara Davin, PsyD, MPH
Ketan Deoras, MD
Beth Dixon, PsyD
Judy Dodds, PhD
Michelle Drerup, PsyD
Jung El-Mallawany, MD
Emad Estemalik, MD
tatiana Falcone, MD
lara Feldman, Do
Darlene Floden, PhD
Kathleen Franco, MD
Margo Funk, MD
Harold Goforth, MD
lilian Gonsalves, MD
Jennifer Haut, PhD, ABPP-Cn
Justin Havemann, MD
leslie Heinberg, PhD
Kelly Huffman, PhD
Karen Jacobs, Do
Joseph W. Janesz, PhD, liCDC
Amir Jassani, PhD
Jason Jerry, MD
Xavier Jimenez, MD
Daniel Jones, PhD
Regina Josell, PsyD
Elias Khawam, MD
Patricia Klaas, PhD
Steven Krause, PhD, MBA
Cynthia S. Kubu, PhD, ABPP-Cn
Richard lightbody, MD
Jane Manno, PsyD
Manu Mathews, MD
Michael McKee, PhD
Douglas Mclaughlin, Do
Julie Merrell, PhD
Amit Mohan, MD
Gene Morris, PhD
Douglas Moul, MD
Donna Munic-Miller, PhD
Kathryn Muzina, MD
Richard naugle, PhD
Mayur Pandya, Do
Michael Parsons, PhD
leopoldo Pozuelo, MD
Kathleen Quinn, MD
ted Raddell, PhD
laurel Ralston, Do
Stephen Rao, PhD
Joseph Rock, PsyD
Michael Rosas, MD
Robert Rowney, Do
Judith Scheman, PhD
isabel Schuermeyer, MD
Cynthia Seng, MD
Jean Simmons, PhD
Barry Simon, Do
Catherine Stenroos, PhD
David Streem, MD
Amy Sullivan, PsyD
Giries Sweis, PsyD
George E. tesar, MD
Mackenzie Varkula, Do
Adele Viguera, MD, MPH
John Vitkus, PhD
Kelly Wadeson, PhD
Cynthia White, PsyD
Molly Wimbiscus, MD
Amy Windover, PhD
Staff Listing | Center for Behavioral Health
CLeveL AnD CLInIC CenteR foR BeHAvIoRAL HeALtH | 866.588.2264
the Cleveland Clinic foundation 9500 euclid Avenue | AC311Cleveland, oH 44195
13
-neu
-586
Resources for Physicians
Physician Directory. view our staff online at clevelandclinic.org/staff.
Same-Day Appointments. Cleveland Clinic offers same-day appointments to help your patients get the care they need, right away. Have your patients call our same-day appointment line, 216.444.CARE (2273) or 800.223.CARE (2273).
track your Patients’ Care online. establish a secure online DrConnect account for real-time information about your patients’ treatment at Cleveland Clinic at clevelandclinic.org/drconnect.
Critical Care transport Worldwide. to arrange for a critical care transfer, call 216.448.7000 or 866.547.1467. Learn more at clevelandclinic.org/criticalcaretransport.
CME opportunities: live and online. visit ccfcme.org to learn about the Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing education’s convenient, complimentary learning opportunities.
outcomes Data. view outcomes books at clevelandclinic.org/outcomes.
Clinical trials. We offer thousands of clinical trials for qualifying patients. visit clevelandclinic.org/clinicaltrials.
Executive Education. Learn about our executive visitors’ Program and two-week Samson global Leadership Academy immersion program at clevelandclinic.org/executiveeducation.
About Cleveland ClinicCleveland Clinic is an integrated healthcare delivery system with local, national and international reach. At Cleveland Clinic, more than 3,000 physicians and researchers represent 120 medical specialties and subspecialties. We are a non-profit academic medical center with a main campus, eight community hospitals, more than 75 northern ohio outpatient locations (including 16 full-service family health centers), Cleveland Clinic florida, Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health in Las vegas, Cleveland Clinic Canada, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City and Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi.
In 2013, Cleveland Clinic was ranked one of America’s top 4 hospitals in U.S. News & World Report’s annual “America’s Best Hospitals” survey. the survey ranks Cleveland Clinic among the nation’s top 10 hospitals in 14 specialty areas, and the top in heart care for the 19th consecutive year.
24/7 ReferralsReferring Physician Hotline 855.REFER.123 (855.733.3712) clevelandclinic.org/refer123Live help connecting with our specialists,
scheduling and confirming appointments,
and resolving service-related issues.
Hospital Transfers800.553.5056
Stay Connected to Cleveland Clinic on…
insights 2013: A publication of the Center for Behavioral Health
Download our NeW Physician Referral App today!Contacting us is now easier than ever before.
With our new free Physician Referral App, you can view all of our specialists and get in touch immediately with one click of your iPhone®, iPad®, or Android™ phone or tablet.
DoWnloAD toDAy at the App Store or Google Play.