institute of combustion and power plant technology...prof. dr. techn. g. scheffknecht institute of...

22
Prof. Dr. techn. G. Scheffknecht Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology Experiences and Results of SO 3 Measurements Performed under Oxy Coal Fired Conditions IEA-GHG – Special Workshop “Addressing the SO2/SO3/Hg and Corrosion Issues in Oxyfuel Combustion Boiler and Flue Gas Processing Units” Rembrandt Hotel, London - 25/26 January 2011 Reinhold Spörl Jörg Maier Günter Scheffknecht [email protected] [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Prof. Dr. techn. G. Scheffknecht

    Institute of Combustion and Power Plant Technology

    Experiences and Results of SO3

    Measurements Performed under

    Oxy‐Coal Fired Conditions

    IEA-GHG – Special Workshop

    “Addressing the SO2/SO3/Hg and Corrosion Issues in

    Oxyfuel Combustion Boiler and Flue Gas Processing Units”

    Rembrandt Hotel, London - 25/26 January 2011

    Reinhold SpörlJörg Maier

    Günter Scheffknecht

    [email protected]@ifk.uni-stuttgart.de

  • 2

    Outline

    1. Background: SO3 generation; H2SO4 formation; Acid dew point;

    Controlled condensation method

    2. Experiences measuring SO3:

    • Choice of the filter material

    • Temperature of the SO3 condenser

    • SOx concentrations in air and oxyfuel firing mode

    • Influence of SCR catalyst on acid due point

    3. Conclusions

    4. Outlook

  • SO3 sources (1/2)

    • Variable amounts of sulfur (e.g. pyrite FeS2) in coal, e.g.:

    Sulfur content in central European brown coals: 0.2 up to 5 % [1]

    • Oxidation of sulfur to SO2 during coal combustion

    • Further oxidation of part of the SO2 to SO3

    Predominant oxidation reactions in the boiler [2]:

    M indicates a caytalyst (e.g. Fe2O3); Most efficient at 700 to 800°C.

    Relatively slow; Equilibrium on left side at high temperatures

    3

    MSO M OSO 32 +→++

    32 SO OSO →+

  • SO3 sources (2/2)

    • SO3 generation mainly depends on:

    − O2 concentration in boiler: possible increase in oxyfuel firings

    − SO2 concentration in boiler: increase by factor 3-4 in oxyfuel firings

    − Presence of catalytically active material (e.g. Fe2O3 in fly ash)

    − Residence time of the flue gas between 700 and 800°C

    • SO2 oxidation takes place:

    −In the boiler and economizer: depending on coal and boiler (in air firings: up to

    1.6% of toal SO2 converted) [3]

    −In the SCR-reactor (in air firings up to 1.25% of total SO2 converted) [3]

    4

  • H2SO4 formation and dew point (1/3)

    • SO3 and H2O form vapour sulfuric acid H2SO4 [4]:

    − Formation starts at about 400°C.

    − At about 200°C almost all SO3 is

    consumed.

    5

    )g(42

    (g)2

    (g)3 SOH OHSO →+

  • H2SO4 formation and dew point (2/3)

    • Condensation of H2SO4 when temperature falls below acid dew

    point temperature: TDew = f(pSO3, pH2O)

    • TDew calculation at IFK according

    to Zarenezhad [5]

    • TDew formerly calculated according

    to Verhoff/Banchero [6] or Okkes [7]:

    −Verhoff/Banchero equation overpredicts TDew

    −Okkes equation underpredicts TDew

    6

  • H2SO4 formation and dew point (3/3)

    • Acid dew points calculated according to Zarenezhad equation:

    • Typical dew points in air fired power plants: 95-150°C

    7

  • Controlled condensation method (1/1)

    • No other flue gas component condensing at 100-200°C

    • Separation of H2SO4 through selective condensation

    • Condenser: Glas coil tempered between water and acid dew point

    • Sample train:

    • Sample analysis by titration or chromatography8

    in out

    H2SO4 condenser

  • Experiences: Choice of filter material (1/5)

    • At IFK in-stack dust removal is considered to be the most reliable

    configuration, to avoid H2SO4 condensation on the filter

    • Possible filter material for in-stack dust removal:

    −Glass wool: glass fibers consisting of SiO2 (approx. 70 %), Al2O3, CaO, K2O,

    MgO and NaO

    −Quarz wool: quarz fibers consisting of >99% SiO2

    9

  • Experiences: Choice of filter material (2/5)

    • Handling of glass and quarz wool:

    −Glass wool:

    cheap

    easy to handle

    −Quarz wool:

    very brittle

    breaks into small fibrous dust when force is applied

    difficult to apply on the filter cartrige of the probe

    possible contamination of the sample by small fibre

    pieces

    10

  • Experiences: Choice of filter material (3/5)

    • Experiments on IFK‘s 20 kW entrain flow reactor (air fired)

    • Firing of 1.5 kg/h El Cerrejon hard coal

    • SO2 content in the flue gas: ~ 1300 mg/m3 (STP)

    • SO3 measurements at a SCR catalyst (Tin • 395°C)11

  • • Sampling with glass wool for dust removal (all samples taken behind catalyst)

    −Variation of the sampling volume:

    acid mist not or late (after 30 min of sampling) visible in H2SO4 collector

    −Addition of SO2 with secondary air (sampling volume 190l (STP)):

    acid mist visible after 10-15 minutes of sampling

    Saturation behaviour

    Experiences: Choice of filter material (4/5)

    12

    No. Sampling volume [l] (STP) SO3 in fluegas [mg/m3] (STP)

    A 96 0.3

    B 218 0.2

    C 247 0.3

    D 349 3.6

    Shorter saturation time

    No. SO2 in fluegas [mg/m3] (STP) SO2 in fluegas [mg/m3] (STP)

    E 5580 9.4

    F 5380 29.9

    G 5200 1.9

    Significant variations

  • Experiences: Choice of filter material (5/5)

    • Sampling with quarz wool for dust removal

    −Sampling volume ~ 200l (STP)

    −Sampling before and behind SCR catalyst:

    acid mist visible after 1-2 minutes of sampling, minor

    variation of concentrations

    13

    No. Sampling position SO3 in fluegas [mg/m3] (STP)

    H Before catalyst 5.8

    I Before catalyst 4.4

    J Behind catalyst 52.0

    K Behind catalyst 53.3

    For comparison (sampling with glass wool)

    B Before catalyst 0.2

    Dust removal by quarz wool

    Dust removal by glass woolNo saturation behaviour with quarz wool

  • Experiences: SO3 condenser temperature (1/2)

    • Temperature of condenser coil between acid and water dew point

    −H2SO4 condensation follows the phase

    equilibrium according to the acid dew point:

    If the condenser coil is tempered to 121°C,

    1.7 ppm H2SO4 remain in the gas phase

    −Temperature far below acid dew point, to

    asure a high level of H2SO4 condensation

    −Temperature high enough above water

    dewpoint to avoid water condensation in coil:

    20-30K above water dew point14

    Water dewpoints for water contents of 12,

    28 and 35 Vol-%

  • Experiences: SO3 condenser temperature (2/2)

    • Water and acid dew points in air and oxyfuel mode measured at

    IFK‘s 500kW PC combustion rig:

    (calculated from H2SO4 and water concentrations)

    − Maximum water dewpoint (with soot blower: water content >35 Vol-%): 75°C

    • Recommended coil temperature:

    −Air firing: 75-80°C

    −Oxyfuel firing: 85-95°C (depending on water concentration)

    15

    Air firing Oxyfuel firing

    Water concentration [Vol-%] 11.8 28.3

    Water dewpoint [°C] 49.1 67.8

    Acid dewpoint [°C] 130-140 ~160

  • Measurements at IFK‘s 500kW combustion rig (1/3)

    • Measurements at IFK‘s 500kW PC combustion rig

    • Firing of ~50kg/h high sulfur brown coal

    • Operation in air and oxyfuel mode16

    Bottomash

    ID fanESPSCR

    Storagetanks

    FD/ RG fan

    O2

    CO2

    Stack

    Air O2 CO2

    Pre-Heater

    Coal feeding

    Air

    By-passes

  • Measurements at IFK‘s 500kW combustion rig (2/3)

    • SO2 concentrations:

    −Concentrations increased by a factor of 2.6 to 3.1 (air : oxyfuel)

    −Maximum SO2 concentrations in oxyfuel firing mode: approx. 11700 mg/m3

    (STP) [reference O2: 6 Vol-%]

    • SO3 concentrations (measured at different positions along the

    flue gas path):

    SO3 concentrations in air firing mode:

    up to 40 mg/m3 (STP) [reference O2: 6 Vol-%]

    High SO3 concentrations in oxyfuel firing mode:

    up to 200 mg/m3 (STP) [reference O2: 6 Vol-%]

    17

  • Measurements at IFK‘s 500kW combustion rig (3/3)

    − Increase of acid dew point over SCR catalyst (qualitative):

    18

    Increase of approx.

    30mg/Nm3

    Increase of approx.

    30mg/Nm3

    ~2 K

    ~15 K

    Air firing

    Oxyfuel firing

  • Conclusions (1/1)

    • Controlled condensation method at IFK:

    −Filter material for in-stack dust removal: Quarzwool

    −H2SO4 condenser coil temperature:

    Air firing: 75-80°C

    Oxyfuel firing: 85-95°C (depending on H2O content)

    • Significantly higher SO3 concentrations in oxyfuel mode

    • Influence of SCR catalyst on acid due point is less pronounced in

    oxyfuel firings

    19

  • Outlook

    • Future research topics:

    −Test and evaluation of continous SO3 analysers (e.g.: Severn Science

    analyser, FTIR)

    −Evaluation of the influence of fly ash in the gas sampling probe on SO3

    measurements

    −Evaluation of the SO3 evolution over the flue gas path in air and oxyfuel

    combustion, e.g.:

    SO3 capture in the ESP

    SO3 formation in the boiler

    Possibility of SO3 enrichment due to flue gas recirculation

    20

  • Literature

    [1] P. ADOLPHI ; M. STÖRR ; P.G. MAHLBERG ; H.H. MURRAY ; E.M. RIPLEY: Sulfur sources and sulfur bonding of some central European attrital brown coals. In: International Journal of Coal Geology 16 (1990), S. 185–188

    [2] T. L. JORGENSEN, H. LIVBJERG, P. GLARBORG: Shorter Communication - Homogeneous and heterogeneously catalyzed oxidation of SO2; In: Chemical Engineering Science 62 (2007), S. 4496 – 4499

    [3] R.K. SRIVASTAVA ; C.A. MILLER ; C. ERICKSON ; R. JAMBHEKAR: Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal fired power plants. In: Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 54 (2004), S. 750–762

    [4] R. HARDMAN ; R. STACY: Estimating Sulfuric Acid Aerosol Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants. Conference on Formation, Distribution, Impact, and Fate of Sulfur Trioxide in Utility Flue Gas Streams, 1998

    [5] B. ZARENEZHAD: New correlation predicts flue gas sulfuric acid dewpoints. In: Oil & Gas Journal 107 (2009), S. 60–63

    [6] F.H. VERHOFF ; J.T. BANCHERO: Predicting dewpoints of flue gases. In: Chemical Engineering Progress 70 (1974), S. 71–72

    [7] A. G. OKKES: Get acid dewpoint of flue gas. In: Hydrocarbon Processing 7 (1987), S. 53–55

    Literature recommendation (background information on SO3 measurement):

    • Workshop Proceedings on Primary Sulfate Emissions from Combustion Sources. Volume I. Measurement Technology., 1978

    21

  • Thank you for your attention!

    22

    IEA-GHG – Special Workshop�“Addressing the SO2/SO3/Hg and Corrosion Issues in �Oxyfuel Combustion Boiler and Flue Gas Processing Units”�Rembrandt Hotel, London - 25/26 January 2011OutlineSO3 sources (1/2)SO3 sources (2/2)H2SO4 formation and dew point (1/3)H2SO4 formation and dew point (2/3)H2SO4 formation and dew point (3/3)Controlled condensation method (1/1)Experiences: Choice of filter material (1/5)Experiences: Choice of filter material (2/5)Experiences: Choice of filter material (3/5)Experiences: Choice of filter material (4/5)Experiences: Choice of filter material (5/5)Experiences: SO3 condenser temperature (1/2)Experiences: SO3 condenser temperature (2/2)Measurements at IFK‘s 500kW combustion rig (1/3)Measurements at IFK‘s 500kW combustion rig (2/3)Measurements at IFK‘s 500kW combustion rig (3/3)Conclusions (1/1)OutlookLiteratureSlide Number 22