institutional assessment implementing electronic medical records in a suboxone clinic
DESCRIPTION
Institutional Assessment Implementing Electronic Medical Records in a Suboxone Clinic. Tonya Anderson NURS 7250. Implementation of Electronic Medical Records. Affordable Care Act American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Meaningful Use. Needs Assessment in Suboxone Clinic. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Institutional AssessmentImplementing Electronic Medical Records in a Suboxone Clinic
Tonya AndersonNURS 7250
Implementation of Electronic Medical Records Affordable Care Act
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Meaningful Use
Needs Assessment in Suboxone Clinic
Need- Electronic Health Record
Drug Addiction Treatment Act
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
Assessment Theory Chaudron
Get started Assess Choose Treatment Periodic Evaluation
Application to Suboxone Clinic
Facility Assessment Change
Improvement
Triggered by problem or opportunity
Change affects several areas of operation
Change Theory Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory
Unfreezing
The moving Stage
Refreezing Stage
Change Theory Roger’s Change Theory
Knowledge Persuasion Decision Implementation Confirmation
Application to Suboxone Clinic
The Change Changing from paper records to
electronic medical records Barriers
Incorporating older paper charts --Time consuming, difficult to read
Privacy Limitations of hardware Internet downtime
Stakeholders Definition- “a person or group that has
an investment , share, or interest in something, as a business or industry” (stakeholder, 2012)
Physician Software company
Reason For The Change Help to meet the DEA guidelines Institute of Medicine goals –effective,
safe, efficient, and individually focused More accurate data, faster service Lower supply costs
Vested Interests Physician
Remote access E-prescribing Comply with Drug Addition Treatment Act
of 2000 Monitor patient numbers Treatment plans Prescription monitoring
Human Drivers Physician
Compliance with the DEA Improve patient outcomes Minimize paper Ensures privacy Allows remote access
Resources Computers Software Internet Scanner Printer/fax
Evaluation Theory Input, Process, Output, Outcome Model
(IPO) Input- evaluate system performance
indicators Process- embracing the plan, design
development, and delivery Output- gather result from training
evaluation Outcome- long term results
Evaluation Theory Kirkpatrick’s Learning Evaluation Model
Reaction Learning Behavior Results
Application to Suboxone Clinic
References Clark, D. (1012, May 4). Kirkpatrick 4-level of
evaluation: Happy sheets? Surely past its sell-by-date [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/kirkpatrick-4-levels-of-evaluation.html
Creasey, T. (2007). Defining change management: Helping other understand change management in relation to project management and organizational change. Change Management Learning Center. Retrieved from http://www.change-management.com/Prosci-Defining-Change-Management.pdf
References Kritsonis, A.(2004-2005). Comparison of change
theories. International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity 8(1), 1-7. Retrieved from http://nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Kritsonis,%20Alicia%20Comparison%20of%20Change%20Theories.pdf
Orr, G. (2003, March 18). [Review of the book Diffusion of Innovations, by Everett Rogers, 1995]. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/class/symbsys205/Diffusion%20of%20Innovations.htm
Stakeholder (2012). In Dictionary.com. Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Stakeholder