institutionalizing continuous quality improvements (cqi)

20
Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI) CCCCIO Conference Student Success Through Quality Educational Practices San Diego, California October 28, 2010 Presentation by: David Longanecker President, Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education EXERPTED CHARTS FROM:

Upload: deepak

Post on 04-Jan-2016

56 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

EXERPTED CHARTS FROM:. CCCCIO Conference Student Success Through Quality Educational Practices San Diego, California October 28, 2010 Presentation by: David Longanecker President, Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

CCCCIO ConferenceStudent Success Through Quality Educational Practices

San Diego, California

October 28, 2010

Presentation by:David LonganeckerPresident, Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE)

CCCCIO ConferenceStudent Success Through Quality Educational Practices

San Diego, California

October 28, 2010

Presentation by:David LonganeckerPresident, Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (WICHE)

EXERPTED CHARTS FROM:

Page 2: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

The Liberal BorrowingsThe Liberal Borrowings

Knocking on the College Door (WICHE)

Beyond Social Justice (WICHE)

National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS) : www.higheredinfo.org.

State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO), SHEF Report, February 2010.

Page 3: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Relationship Between Educational Attainment, Personal Income, and Economic Strength

Relationship Between Educational Attainment, Personal Income, and Economic Strength

Source: NCHEMS

AL

AZ

AR

CA

CO

CT

DE IL

IN

IA

KY

LA

MDMA

MS

NJ

NY

NDOK

OR

SC

SD

UT

VA

WAMN

NH

TN TX

WV

WI

WY

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Pers

onal In

com

e P

er

Capit

a,

20

00

Percent of Adults Age 25-64 with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher

MT

HI

AK

GA

KS

ME NE

NV

NC

OH PAVT

ID

MI

MO

NM

RIFL US

Low Income, High Educational AttainmentLow Income, Low Educational Attainment

High Income, High Educational AttainmentHigh Income, Low Educational Attainment

State New Economy Index (2002)

Top Tier

Middle Tier

Low Tier

Page 4: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Percent of Population Ages 25-64 with a Bachelor’s Degree or HigherPercent of Population Ages 25-64 with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 American Community Survey. Via NCHEMS

Page 5: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Percent of Population Ages 25-64 with an Associate DegreePercent of Population Ages 25-64 with an Associate Degree

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 American Community Survey. Via NCHEMS

Page 6: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Differences in College Attainment (Associate and Higher) Between Younger and Older Adults - U.S. and OECD Countries, 2005

Differences in College Attainment (Associate and Higher) Between Younger and Older Adults - U.S. and OECD Countries, 2005

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Education at a Glance 2007

Page 7: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Differences in College Attainment (Associate and Higher) Between Younger and Older Adults - U.S., 2005

Differences in College Attainment (Associate and Higher) Between Younger and Older Adults - U.S., 2005

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 ACS

Page 8: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

WICHE Projections of High School GradsWICHE Projections of High School Grads

Source: WICHE, Knocking at the College Door: Projections of High School Graduates by State and Race/Ethnicity 1992-2022. 2008.

Page 9: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

WICHE Projections of High School GradsWICHE Projections of High School Grads

Source: WICHE, Knocking at the College Door: Projections of High School Graduates by State and Race/Ethnicity 1992-2022. 2008.

Page 10: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

High School Graduation Rates - Public High School Graduates as a Percent of 9th Graders Four Years Earlier, 2006

High School Graduation Rates - Public High School Graduates as a Percent of 9th Graders Four Years Earlier, 2006

0

20

40

60

80

100

Source: Tom Mortenson, Postsecondary Opportunity Via NCHEMS

Page 11: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

College-Going Rates – First-Time Freshmen Directly Out of High School as a Percent of Recent High School Graduates, 2006

College-Going Rates – First-Time Freshmen Directly Out of High School as a Percent of Recent High School Graduates, 2006

0

25

50

75

Mississip

pi

New

Yo

rk

No

rth D

akota

So

uth D

akota

Massach

usetts

New

Mexico

Co

nn

ecticut

New

Jersey

Min

neso

ta

Geo

rgia

Virg

inia

Kan

sas

Marylan

d

No

rth C

arolina

Louisian

a

Mich

igan

New

Ham

psh

ire

Main

e

Nebraska

Delaw

are

So

uth C

arolin

a

Ten

nessee

Ind

iana

Co

lorado

Alabam

a

Pen

nsylvania

Natio

n

Ken

tucky

Wisco

nsin

Iow

a

Illino

is

Flo

rida

Oh

io

Haw

aii

Oklah

om

a

Mo

ntan

a

Wyo

min

g

West V

irgin

ia

Misso

uri

Arkan

sas

Califo

rnia

Texas

Verm

on

t

Rh

od

e Island

Nevad

a

Wash

ington

Oreg

on

Utah

Alaska

Idah

o

Arizo

na

Source: Tom Mortenson, Postsecondary Opportunity Via NCHEMS

Page 12: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Difference Between Whites and Next Largest Race/Ethnic Group in Percentage of Adults Age 25-34 with an Associate Degree or Higher, 2000

Difference Between Whites and Next Largest Race/Ethnic Group in Percentage of Adults Age 25-34 with an Associate Degree or Higher, 2000

0

10

20

30

40

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, PUMS (based on 2000 Census), Via NCHEMS

Page 13: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Not Much Happens After the Age of 24

Patterns of U.S. High School and College Participation and Completion by Age (Average Annual from 2005 to 2007)Patterns of U.S. High School and College Participation and Completion by Age (Average Annual from 2005 to 2007)

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005-07 American Community Survey (Public Use Microdata Sample)

High School Participation

Undergraduate College Participation – Peaks at Age 19, Levels off at Age 30

Earn High School Diploma or Equivalent – Levels off at Age 21

Complete Undergraduate College Degree – Peaks and Levels off at Age 31

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40AGE

We are left with 13 percent of adults with no high school diploma, and 60

percent with no college degree.

Note: Includes associate and bachelor’s degrees, but not certificates.

Page 14: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Life could have been worseLife could have been worse

Public FTE Enrollment, Educational Appropriations and Total Educational Revenue per FTE, U.S., Fiscal 1983-2008

Source: SHEEO, SHEF 2008

Page 15: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Revenues Per Student from Net Tuition, State, & Local Appropriations Public Research

Revenues Per Student from Net Tuition, State, & Local Appropriations Public Research

$2

9,1

72

$2

4,1

84

$2

3,2

63

$2

2,0

95

$2

1,6

40

$2

1,3

84

$2

0,0

10

$1

9,8

65

$1

9,7

83

$1

9,7

21

$1

9,5

45

$1

9,2

27

$1

8,9

89

$1

8,8

43

$1

8,7

73

$1

8,6

57

$1

8,5

37

$1

7,6

10

$1

7,3

60

$1

7,2

67

$1

6,9

74

$1

6,7

74

$1

6,2

75

$1

6,1

95

$1

6,1

72

$1

6,1

55

$1

6,0

92

$1

6,0

59

$1

6,0

57

$1

5,8

37

$1

5,7

74

$1

5,7

14

$1

5,5

68

$1

5,5

41

$1

5,4

06

$1

5,1

80

$1

5,1

25

$1

5,0

93

$1

5,0

03

$1

4,8

65

$1

4,7

77

$1

4,0

18

$1

4,0

06

$1

3,6

75

$1

3,1

21

$1

2,6

66

$1

2,4

49

$1

2,3

24

$1

1,6

20

$1

1,2

43

$9

,682

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

Alaska

Min

ne

sota

Haw

aiiC

on

ne

cticu

tN

ew

York

Ve

rmo

nt

No

rth C

arolin

aM

assachu

sett

sK

en

tucky

Wyo

min

gM

aryland

Ne

braska

Alab

ama

Califo

rnia

Iow

aD

elaw

areN

ew

Jerse

yTe

nn

esse

eW

ashin

gton

Sou

th C

arolin

aM

aine

Pe

nn

sylvania

Ne

w M

exico

Nati

on

Idah

oIn

dian

aM

ichigan

Misso

uri

Rh

od

e Islan

dK

ansas

Virgin

iaG

eo

rgiaU

tahW

iscon

sinO

klaho

ma

Ne

vada

Oh

ioW

est V

irginia

Arizo

na

Arkan

sasIllin

ois

Florid

aN

orth

Dako

taN

ew

Ham

psh

ireTe

xasLo

uisian

aM

ississipp

iO

rego

nSo

uth

Dako

taM

on

tana

Co

lorad

o

Sources: NCES, IPEDS 2006-07 Finance Files; f0607_f1a and f0607_f2 Final Release Data Files. NCES, IPEDS 2007-08 Institutional Characteristics File; hd2007 Final Release Data File. NCES, IPEDS 2006-07 Enrollment Files; ef2006a, effy2007, and efia2007 Final Release Data Files. Via NCHEMS

Page 16: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Revenues Per Student from Net Tuition, State, & Local Appropriations Public Masters and Baccalaureate

Revenues Per Student from Net Tuition, State, & Local Appropriations Public Masters and Baccalaureate

$17,984 $16,148 $14,587$14,440$14,426

$13,683$12,929

$12,324$12,105$12,011$11,862

$11,443$11,443$11,389$11,284$11,266$11,249$11,063$10,836$10,788$10,778$10,721$10,464$10,405$10,370$10,343$10,312$10,275$10,251$10,179$10,162$10,039

$9,957$9,945$9,933$9,702$9,701$9,630$9,622$9,410$9,185$8,959$8,846$8,748

$8,414$8,400

$7,964$7,877

$7,209$6,311 $5,105

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

$18,000

$20,000

De

laware

Haw

aiiC

on

ne

cticu

tN

orth

Caro

lina

Alaska

Ne

w Je

rsey

Ne

w M

exico

Iow

aM

aryland

Massach

use

tts

Main

eV

erm

on

tV

irginia

Rh

od

e Islan

dA

labam

aM

on

tana

Illino

isW

ashin

gton

Ne

w Yo

rkFlo

rida

Mich

iganSo

uth

Caro

lina

Ke

ntu

ckyO

hio

Mississip

pi

Nati

on

Id

aho

Misso

uri

DC

Kan

sasP

en

nsylvan

iaC

aliforn

iaN

ew

Ham

psh

ireM

inn

eso

taTe

xasIn

dian

aTe

nn

esse

eO

rego

nN

orth

Dako

taA

rkansas

Ne

braska

Wisco

nsin

Ne

vada

Oklah

om

aLo

uisian

aG

eo

rgiaW

est V

irginia

Sou

th D

akota

Arizo

na

Utah

Co

lorad

o

Sources: NCES, IPEDS 2006-07 Finance Files; f0607_f1a and f0607_f2 Final Release Data Files. NCES, IPEDS 2007-08 Institutional Characteristics File; hd2007 Final Release Data File. NCES, IPEDS 2006-07 Enrollment Files; ef2006a, effy2007, and efia2007 Final Release Data Files. Via NCHEMS

Page 17: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Revenues Per Student from Net Tuition, State, & Local Appropriations Public 2-Year

Revenues Per Student from Net Tuition, State, & Local Appropriations Public 2-Year

$14,793$11,197

$10,683$10,287

$9,964$9,953

$9,125$8,844$8,801$8,705$8,625$8,480$8,449$8,411$8,378$8,214$8,067$8,044

$7,772$7,633$7,566$7,509$7,507$7,448$7,432$7,416$7,403$7,329$7,239$7,222$7,117$7,018$6,918$6,895$6,844$6,823$6,714$6,676$6,630$6,510$6,465$6,353

$6,082$6,028$5,970$5,945$5,939$5,712$5,517$5,297

$3,369

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

Wisco

nsin

Haw

aiiW

yom

ing

Marylan

dD

elaw

areC

on

ne

cticu

tV

erm

on

tK

ansas

Ore

gon

Ne

w Yo

rkN

ew

Ham

psh

ireId

aho

Massach

use

tts

Ne

w M

exico

Alaska

Mich

iganP

en

nsylvan

iaN

orth

Dako

taM

inn

eso

taA

rizon

aR

ho

de

Island

Oh

ioU

tahN

orth

Caro

lina

Texas

Nati

on

Mo

ntan

aC

aliforn

iaW

ashin

gton

Main

eN

evad

aA

labam

aIllin

ois

Ne

braska

Misso

uri

Lou

isiana

Ten

ne

ssee

Iow

aA

rkansas

Ne

w Je

rsey

Oklah

om

aSo

uth

Caro

lina

Florid

aG

eo

rgiaM

ississipp

iV

irginia

Sou

th D

akota

Co

lorad

oIn

dian

aK

en

tucky

We

st Virgin

ia

Sources: NCES, IPEDS 2006-07 Finance Files; f0607_f1a and f0607_f2 Final Release Data Files. NCES, IPEDS 2007-08 Institutional Characteristics File; hd2007 Final Release Data File. NCES, IPEDS 2006-07 Enrollment Files; ef2006a, effy2007, and efia2007 Final Release Data Files. Via NCHEMS

Page 18: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Projected State and Local Budget Surplus (Gap) as a Percent of Revenues, 2016

Projected State and Local Budget Surplus (Gap) as a Percent of Revenues, 2016

Source: NCHEMS; Don Boyd (Rockefeller Institute of Government), 2009 Via NCHEMS

-2.1

-2.2

-2.3

-2.3

-2.4

-2.6

-2.7

-2.9 -3

-3.3

-3.5

-3.5

-3.8

-4.1

-4.6

-4.7

-4.8

-4.9 -5

-5.1

-5.2

-5.4

-5.7

-5.7

-5.8

-5.8

-6-6

.2-6

.3-6

.3-6

.7-6

.7-6

.8-7

.2-7

.4-7

.8-8

-8.1

-8.1

-8.5

-8.5

-8.5

-8.7

-8.9

-9.1

-9.4

-9.5

-9.7

-10

.6-1

0.8

-10

.9

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

Mar

ylan

dM

ain

eV

erm

on

tN

ew

Je

rse

yC

on

ne

cticu

tN

ew

Ham

psh

ire

Rh

od

e Is

lan

dN

ort

h D

ako

taW

isco

nsi

nM

assa

chu

sett

sM

ich

igan

Wyo

min

gC

alif

orn

iaO

hio

De

law

are

Kan

sas

Ore

gon

Vir

gin

iaN

ew

Yo

rkM

inn

eso

taW

est

Vir

gin

iaP

en

nsy

lvan

iaIll

ino

isA

lask

aN

eb

rask

aM

on

tan

aU

nit

ed

Sta

tes

Lou

isia

na

Ind

ian

aH

awai

iO

klah

om

aN

ew

Me

xico

Mis

sou

riK

en

tuck

yIo

wa

Sou

th D

ako

taW

ash

ingt

on

Flo

rid

aSo

uth

Car

olin

aA

rkan

sas

Ge

org

iaC

olo

rad

oTe

nn

ess

ee

No

rth

Car

olin

aId

aho

Uta

hA

rizo

na

Ne

vad

aA

lab

ama

Texa

sM

issi

ssip

pi

Page 19: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

State Tax Capacity & EffortIndexed to U.S. AverageState Tax Capacity & EffortIndexed to U.S. Average

Source: State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO)

AL

AK

AZ

AR

CACO

CT

DE

GA HI

IL

IN IAKS

KYLA

ME

MD

MA

MS

MT

NE

NV

NJ

NY

NC

ND

OH

OK

PA

RI

SC

SD

UT

VT

VA

WA

FL

ID

MI

MN

MO

NH

NM

TNTX

WV

WI

WY

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

Sta

te T

ax C

apacity

(Tota

l Taxable

Reso

urce

s Per C

apita

)

State Tax Effort (Effective Tax Rate)

US

OR

Page 20: Institutionalizing Continuous Quality Improvements (CQI)

Productivity: Total Funding per Degree/Certificate (Weighted*, 2006-2007)

Productivity: Total Funding per Degree/Certificate (Weighted*, 2006-2007)

29,0

75

30,6

19

33,2

73

33,7

56

34,3

30

34,5

94

36,4

98

37,8

23

38,3

64

38,3

65

39,5

16

39,5

16

39,9

18

42,1

77

42,1

98

42,4

08

42,6

93

42,8

47

42,8

73

42,9

48

43,8

20

44,2

72

44,3

71

45,8

33

45,9

04

46,5

22

46,8

80

47,4

53

47,6

72

47,7

49

48,6

11

49,8

94

52,4

91

52,5

72

52,8

88

53,5

35

54,5

53

56,0

90

56,2

80

56,8

88

56,9

60

59,4

20

59,4

65

63,8

22

64,9

34

65,9

75

66,6

23

72,8

46

75,7

44

79,7

94

86,0

09

-

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

FloridaC

oloradoW

ashingtonU

tahN

orth Dakota

Oklahom

aW

est Virginia

Montana

South Dakota

KansasG

eorgiaLouisianaW

isconsinIdahoN

ew H

ampshire

IllinoisM

ississippiA

rizonaA

rkansasM

innesotaO

regonKentuckyIow

aV

irginiaM

issouriN

ation

Ohio

IndianaN

ebraskaTexasSouth C

arolinaN

orth Carolina

Michigan

TennesseeN

ew M

exicoC

aliforniaM

ainePennsylvaniaA

labama

New

YorkN

evadaM

arylandVerm

ontN

ew Jersey

Massachusett

sH

awaii

Connecti

cutR

hode IslandD

elaware

Wyom

ingA

laska

Tuition and FeesState and Local

Sources: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance Survey 2008; NCES, IPEDS Completions Survey; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (Public Use MicrodataSamples)

*Adjusted for value of degrees in the state employment market (median earnings by degree type and level)

Sources: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance Survey 2008; NCES, IPEDS Completions Survey; U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (Public Use Microdata Samples)