instruction goals assessment for each student for all students enhancing core reading instruction...
TRANSCRIPT
Instruction
GoalsAssessment
For Each
Student
For All Students
Enhancing Core Reading Instruction Enhancing Core Reading Instruction
for English Language Learners in Grades 2-3 for English Language Learners in Grades 2-3
Institute on Beginning Reading IIInstitute on Beginning Reading II
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 2
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
Oregon Department of Education
Institute for the Development of Educational
Achievement, College of Education, University
of Oregon
U.S. Department of Education,
Office of Special Education Programs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 3
CopyrightCopyright
All materials are copy written and should
not be reproduced or used without
expressed permission of Dr. Scott Baker
or Maria Elena Arguelles. Selected slides
were reproduced from other sources and
original references cited.
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 4
The objectives of today’s session are to:
1. Understand the role of assessment in
Reading First with English Language
Learners (ELLs).
2. Identify instructional practices related to
positive academic outcomes for ELLs.
3. Identify methods to enhance core reading
instruction for ELLs.
Objectives: What You WillObjectives: What You WillLearn and DoLearn and Do
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 5
Scientific Research in EducationScientific Research in Education
A Body of Knowledge: established through analysis of information
collected in specific ways in Early Literacy provides foundation for
Beginning Reading Instruction
An Ongoing Process: providing principles for collecting new information,
plus analysis and interpretation of information in Beginning Reading, provides foundation for
determining ongoing effects
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 6
Satisfy both conceptions of Research An existing body of knowledge indicates their
use (schools acting on the data) should improve outcomes for students Formative Assessments!!
Will be part of ongoing procedures to evaluate effects Summative Assessments!!
The Role of Assessment in Reading The Role of Assessment in Reading First with ELLsFirst with ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 7
Examples from a 2-year study with English Language Learners
Three objectives1. Collect promising student reading measures
with ELLs in Grade 1
2. Systematically observe beginning reading instruction in Grade 1 classrooms
3. Investigate the relationship between instructional practices in reading and student performance on reading measures
Research on How Assessment Research on How Assessment Devices Work with ELLsDevices Work with ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 8
Spanish 266 (60%)
English 85 (19%)
Somali 23 (5%)
Vietnamese 19 (4%)
Hmong 16 (4%)
Cambodian 14 (3%)
Cantonese 12 (3%)
Tagolog 5 (.1%)
Chinese 3 (.1%)
Laotian 2 (.1%)
Primary Languages of Participating Students
Investigating Assessment Measures Investigating Assessment Measures with ELLswith ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 9
Student Performance Measures DIBELS measures at the beginning and end of
the year Phonemic Segmentation Fluency
Nonsense Word Fluency
Oral Reading Fluency
A measure of Reading Comprehension at the end of the year
Other “trial” measures
Investigating Assessment Measures Investigating Assessment Measures with ELLswith ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 10
Systematic Classroom Observations Moderate inference instrument 30 items rated on a 1-7 scale
General effectiveness items Items specifically targeting effective instruction for ELLs Items targeting instruction in Reading / Language Arts
Framework Observers w/ expertise in ELLs and beginning
reading All observations for the duration of the 2.5 hour
reading period
Investigating Assessment Measures Investigating Assessment Measures with ELLswith ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 11
Results from the StudyResults from the Study
Evidence the primary measures had established reliability and predicted outcomes for English
Language Learners
Meaningful variability in performance Fluency as an index of “comprehension” Ability to predict meaningful outcomes Performance patterns that make sense in the
context of other students Providing pictures of growth over time
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 12
Letter Naming Fluency, Fall Grade 1
100806040200
Oral Reading Fluency, Spring Grade 1
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Letter Naming Fluency, Fall Grade 1
100806040200
Oral Reading Fluency, Spring Grade 1
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Native English Speakersr = .52
English Language Learnersr = .62
Evidence for both the Predictive Variable and the Outcome Variable
Predictive Power with Two Predictive Power with Two PopulationsPopulations
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 13
Evidence for Predicting Outcomes with English language learners
English Speakers (n = 85)
ELL Not Spanish (n = 98)
ELL Spanish(n = 265)
LNF Fall G1 .52 .53 .62
PSF Fall G1 .29 .33 .41
NWF Fall G1 .60 .62 .72
Correlations With Oral Reading Fluency, Spring Grade 1
All correlations are significant, p < .01
Results from the StudyResults from the Study
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 14
But What about Comprehension?
English Speakers(n = 85)
ELL Not Spanish(n = 98)
ELL Spanish(n = 227)
LNF Fall G1 .39 .37 .47
PSF Fall G1 .27 .25 .42
NWF Fall G1 .31 .38 .45
Correlations With Reading Comprehension, Spring Grade 1
Results from the StudyResults from the Study
All correlations are significant, p < .01
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 15
ORF Spring Grade 1
160140120100806040200
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Predicting Reading Outcomes Over Time: The Shape of Things To Come
DIBELS SampleEnglish Language Learner Sample
Results from the StudyResults from the Study
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 16
Risk Status at End of Grade 1
DIBELS Sample
(n = 342)
ELL Sample (n = 247)
High:
ORF < 10
0 / 510%
2 / 425%
Moderate:
ORF = 10 - 39
About 64 / 19333 %
12 / 10511%
Low:
ORF > 39
95 / 9897%
67 / 10067%
Students Who Met Grade 2 Benchmark
Relevancy of DIBELS Benchmarks Relevancy of DIBELS Benchmarks for English Language Learnersfor English Language Learners
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 17
Reading Growth of English Language Learners From Grade 1 to 2: The “Matthew Effect” in Action
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
5th 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th 95th
Grade 1 Percentile Rank
Actual ORF
Growth
Results from the StudyResults from the Study
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 18
General Conclusions of Study General Conclusions of Study Findings Related to AssessmentFindings Related to Assessment
Evidence that DIBELS also measures important reading outcomes with English Language Learners
Initial evidence that outcomes of English Language Learners at the end of Grade 1 is an important predictor of future reading performance
If the second point is true then:
A key issue becomes determining what influences reading performance at the end of Grade 1
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 19
General Conclusions of Study General Conclusions of Study Findings Related to AssessmentFindings Related to Assessment
“Potential” Variables that Influence Reading Outcomes
Reading performance at beginning of the year Evidenced by correlations between measures at
beginning and end of the year English Language Learner Status: i.e., ELL or
fluent English speaker Among English Language Learners -- level of
English language proficiency Reading Instruction throughout the year
Also possible that some combination of variables “interact” to influence optimal reading outcomes
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 20
Separate “Predictors” of Grade 1 ORF Benchmark
0102030405060708090
NonsenseWord
Fluency
EnglishProficiency
ExplicitTeaching
ShelteredTeaching
High
ModerateLow
% of Students Meeting
Benchmark
Predictor Variables
Index on Each
Variable
General Conclusions of Study General Conclusions of Study Findings Related to AssessmentFindings Related to Assessment
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 21
Combination of Three Variables Influencing Grade 1 Benchmark Performance
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Very High High Low Very Low
“Index” on 3-Variable Combination
% of Students Meeting
Benchmark
General Conclusions of Study General Conclusions of Study Findings Related to AssessmentFindings Related to Assessment
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 22
Explicit Teaching Improves the Odds of Strong Outcomes
Items from the Observation Instrument: Models skills and strategies during the lesson Makes relationships among concepts overt Emphasizes distinctive features of new concepts Provides scaffolds in how to use strategies, skills,
and concepts Focus of literacy activities changes regularly Adjusts use of English to make concepts
comprehensible
General Conclusions of Study Findings General Conclusions of Study Findings Related to Observations and OutcomesRelated to Observations and Outcomes
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 23
Sheltered Teaching Techniques Improve the Odds of Strong Outcomes
Items from the Observation Instrument Uses visuals and manipulatives to teach content Provides explicit instruction in English language use Encourages students to give elaborate responses Uses gestures and facial expressions in teaching
vocabulary and clarifying meaning of content
General Conclusions of Study Findings General Conclusions of Study Findings Related to Observations and OutcomesRelated to Observations and Outcomes
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 24
The objectives of today’s session are to:
1. Understand the role of assessment in
Reading First with English Language
Learners (ELLs).
2. Identify instructional practices related to
positive academic outcomes for ELLs.
3. Identify methods to enhance core reading
instruction for ELLs.
Objectives: What You WillObjectives: What You WillLearn and DoLearn and Do
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 25
The common instructional practices found across successful classrooms were the following: Many opportunities for students to produce the skill Strategic integration of content Judicious use of differentiated instruction Ample review of skills Specific instruction on vocabulary
Key finding: Highly successful teachers displayed a seamless integration of instructional objectives.
Instructional Practices Related to Instructional Practices Related to Positive Academic OutcomesPositive Academic Outcomes
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 26
The following examples demonstrate the
utilization and integration of the
instructional practices observed during
the study.
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 27
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Practices Used: Student production of skill and content integration.
Instructional Objective: Integrating Phonics and Vocabulary First set of target words included the following:
b oy
en joy
oy ster
Student blended sounds and gave sentences with target words
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 28
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Practices Used: Student production of skill, content integration, and ample review.
Instructional Objective: Integrating phonics and vocabulary Second set of target words included the following: Voice, spoil, noise:
Each word defined by students or the teacher & used in a sentence
Discussion about similarity among words: voice, similar, noise, boy, enjoy, oyster
Students answer questions & discuss Critical objective was to make sure students understood sounds were the
same but spellings were different
Review 30 minutes later: students given definitions and required to identify target words
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 29
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Practices Used: Content integration, ample review, and student production of the skill.
Instructional Objective: Integrating Phonological Awareness and Vocabulary
Sound for the Day: /aw/ (saw, straw, haul) During Instruction: Teacher said sounds slowly & students said
the word Use of different methods of Vocabulary Instruction
Multiple meaning words (e.g., two kinds of “saw”)
Giving and discussing definitions (e.g., discussed meaning of straw)
Multiple methods of understanding (e.g., vivid demonstration of “haul”)
Students had to use each word in a sentence
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 30
Instructional Practices Used: Student production of skill and frequent vocabulary instruction
Instructional Objective: Vocabulary building 7 minutes into the lesson there was a short vocabulary activity Words from upcoming story were written on the board:
Photo — student gives sentence; teacher shows a photograph, discusses, & uses in a sentence
Graph — teacher shows graph of class’s favorite character (Little Miss Muffet); uses different colored chalk to highlight; students explain the term
Elephant — student gives a sentence; discussion of how an elephant is different than other animals
Telephone — two students gave definitions and used in sentences
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 31
Instructional Practices Used: Judicious use of differentiated instruction and opportunities to practice the skill
Instructional Objective: Teaching phonological segmenting
Most Intense Instruction with Students Most At Risk Daily small group instruction with three English language
learners During one lesson the target words were: fat, fit, fast, pit Lesson emphasis on:
students hearing individual sounds;
seeing patterns (beginning /f/, middle vowel);
each student producing each sound multiple times
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 32
Instructional Practices Used: Specific instruction on
vocabulary and opportunities to produce the skill.
Key Factors Related to Building Vocabulary
Focus on a small number of critical words
Multiple exposures to build depth of knowledge
Provide many opportunities for oral & writing practice
Introduce new words before they are encountered in
reading
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 33
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Practices Used: Integrating vocabulary and comprehension instruction, opportunities to produce skill, and specific instruction on vocabulary (previous day)
Instructional Objective: Comprehension with reading the story “Clyde the Monster”
Difficult vocabulary was taught the day before Students wrote vocabulary words in notebooks they would
use the next day
Students read the story with the teacher Then they wrote a letter to Clyde
Teacher modeled extensively
Students required to use specific vocabulary
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 34
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Practices Used: Integrating vocabulary and comprehension instruction, specific instruction on vocabulary and opportunities to produce skill
Instructional Objective: Comprehension with reading the story “Strange Bumps” by Arnold Lobel
Before Reading Activities In preparing to read, students prompted to use “reading
strategies” -- students identified what those strategies were Emphasis on doing “what good readers do”)
Class browses through the book Importance of understanding: “Brain can see what’s
happening in the story” Teacher uses “think alouds” during this warm-up to model
getting ready to read(Lesson continues on next slides)
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 35
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Objective: Comprehension with reading the story “Strange Bumps” by Arnold Lobel (continued from previous slide)
Before Reading Activities Prior to reading the story there was a short vocabulary
lesson Target words included: darkness, pleasant, tonight
Explanations / discussions of target words were short & context specific; usually with synonyms
Students explained word meanings; Teacher gave summary definition of each word
(lesson continues)
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 36
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Objective: Comprehension with reading the story “Strange Bumps” by Arnold Lobel (continued from previous slides)
During Story Reading Activities During the reading of the story, target words were identified
and students and teacher discussed briefly During this initial reading of the story, frequent pauses to
address comprehension
Students’ attention drawn to central question: “What could those bumps be?” (interjected throughout story)
Students required to use clues and “evidence” from the story to discuss this central question and other story-related questions.
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 37
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Practices Used: Opportunities to produce skill and ample review of skills
Instructional Objective: Building fluency
Less commonly observed than instruction on the other essential early literacy skills When observed, teachers provided fluency building
by: Working in pairs or partners for practice Providing specific time for rereading texts
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 38
Positive Instructional Practices Positive Instructional Practices Related to ELLsRelated to ELLs
Instructional Practices Used: Opportunities to produce skill and ample review of skills
Instructional Objective: Building fluency through pairing or partnering students
Short focused interactions -- teacher monitored and listened for “good” reading and discussions
Students took turns reading -- always discussed what was read; Connections made to the text and their own experiences Discussion with partner about what they do when afraid; after reading
“Strange Bumps” with partner Partner work was also a vehicle for language use
Followed by “seminars” with the whole class Strong academic emphasis in partner work
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 39
Application ActivityApplication Activity
Think about this discussion and write down two ideas or instructional practices you can use with your ELL students to improve their reading skills.
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 40
The objectives of today’s session are to:
1. Understand the role of assessment in
Reading First with English Language
Learners (ELLs).
2. Identify instructional practices related to
positive academic outcomes for ELLs.
3. Identify methods to enhance core reading
instruction for ELLs.
Objectives: What You WillObjectives: What You WillLearn and DoLearn and Do
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 41
Essential Skills for ELLs in 2Essential Skills for ELLs in 2ndnd & 3 & 3rdrd GradesGrades
Vocabulary and Language Development
Fluency and Accuracy in Reading Connected Text
Comprehension Skills and Strategies Instructional Features in Analyzing Text
Vocabulary
Grammatical structures
Cohesive devices
Rhetorical devices
Phraseological patterning
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 42
Text 1: Icebergs and GlaciersThe thicker the glacier the faster it moves. That’s
because the greater weight of the glacier causes the crystals of ice to creep more rapidly. Also, a steep glacier will flow much more quickly than one on level land.
Temperature is a third factor that affects the speed of a glacier. The warmer the glacier the faster the ice moves because there is a greater amount of meltwater beneath the ice. In fact, scientists sometimes group glaciers together depending upon whether they are cold or warm. But even “warm” glaciers are still freezing.
From Icebergs and Glaciers, by Seymor Simon ©1993 by Creative Education
Analyzing TextAnalyzing Text
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 43
Text 2: Collecting Rocks and Crystals
Introducing Rocks and CrystalsRocks and crystals are the raw materials of the
Earth’s surface-the material beneath every hill and valley, mountain and plain. Some are just a few million years old. Others are almost as old as the Earth.
What are rocks?Rocks are never far beneath the ground. They are
only exposed on the surface in a few places-such as bare rock outcrops, cliff faces and quarries. But dig down almost anywhere on the Earth’s surface and you will come to solid rock before long.
(lesson continues)
Analyzing TextAnalyzing Text
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 44
Analyzing TextAnalyzing Text
Text 2: Collecting Rocks and Crystals (cont.)
Like the other smaller planets in the solar system, our world is made almost entirely from rock. The Earth is a bit like a perfectly boiled egg-with a semi-liquid yolk or “core,” surrounded by a thick, soft layer called the mantle, and covered by a thin hard shell called the crust. The core in the very center is metal but the crust and the mantel are entirely from rock.
From collecting Rocks and Crystals, by John Frandon ©1999 by Quarto, Inc
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 45
Analyzing TextAnalyzing Text
Text 3: Mourning Cloak Caterpillar
What It Looks LikeThe mourning cloak caterpillar is black with white
speckles and a row of red diamonds on its back with black bristles. It has shiny eyes. It grows about as long as your ring finger.
When this caterpillar becomes a butterfly, its wings are mostly dark-colored, like old-fashioned funeral shawls worn by women. That is how they got the name “mourning cloak.”
From Caterpillars, Bugs, and Butterflies, by Mel Boring ©1996 by NorthWord Press
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 46
Text 4: Volcanoes
Volcanoes that erupt regularly are known as Active Volcanoes. There are about six hundred active volcanoes on the Earth’s surface. However, only fifty to sixty active volcanoes erupt in any given year.
Whether sitting in silence or erupting with violence, volcanoes have intrigued people for thousands of years. In an attempt to explain the immense power and unpredictable behavior of volcanoes, our ancient ancestors created myths about evil gods that lived within volcanoes. When angered, the gods would display their fury with eruptions.
(lesson continues)
Analyzing TextAnalyzing Text
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 47
Analyzing TextAnalyzing Text
Text 4: Volcanoes (cont.)
Today, scientists explain volcanoes without relying on angry gods. However, the true causes for Volcanic Eruptions are as fascinating as the ancient myths.
From Volcanoes, by Michael George ©1993 by Creative Education.
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 48
General Principles for Instruction General Principles for Instruction When Teaching ELLsWhen Teaching ELLs
Instructional Principle Why Important?Provide “think alouds”
Set clear goals for language and content
Tap student’s prior knowledge
Use visuals & manipulatives
Teach key vocabulary
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 49
General Principles for Instruction General Principles for Instruction When Teaching ELLsWhen Teaching ELLs
Instructional Principle Why Important?
Adjust speech
Provide practice and application
Provide corrective feedback
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 50
Focusing on LanguageFocusing on Language
“No matter what subjects teachers are
teaching, no matter what materials they are
covering, they must give some attention to
language every single day and on each and
every subject which is being taught.”
Lily Wong Filmore (2001)
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 51
Distinguishing between different purposes of language used in school settings is important.
Students learning a second language require different periods of time to develop age-appropriate levels of conversational skills when compared to academic language skills (Cummins, 1981). While there will be individual differences, most children approach native-like proficiency of conversational skills in two years, but seven to 10 years of school exposure for are required for the development of academic language skills.
Conversational v. Academic Conversational v. Academic LanguageLanguage
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 52
Focus on a small number of critical words
Emphasize the words over time
Use stories and writing projects as contexts for vocabulary learning
To the extent possible, choose readings containing only a limited number of new words. Readings should be considered comprehensible input i.e. just slightly above the student’s true reading level at present.
(Gersten & Baker, 2000)
Vocabulary & Language Vocabulary & Language DevelopmentDevelopment
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 53
Teach students different word learning and recognition strategies to apply on their own while they are reading.
Use segments of class time in which the teacher directly teaches key vocabulary.
Provide multiple exposures of the word to build depth of knowledge.
Preteach critical vocabulary prior to student
reading (Rosseau, Tam, & Ramnarain, 1993).
Vocabulary & Language Vocabulary & Language DevelopmentDevelopment
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 54
Provide ELLs with frequent opportunities to use oral language in the classroom. Active, daily language use should be structured to
include both conversational and academic discourse (Gersten & Baker, 2000).
Teach students to distinguish and look-up words that seem most essential to the meaning of the text such as those that are repeated four or five times (Birch, 2002).
Teach students how to look at morphological cues within the word that might indicate something about its meaning or part of speech (Osburne & Mulling, 2001).
Vocabulary & Language Vocabulary & Language DevelopmentDevelopment
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 55
Using repeated reading, teacher modeling, and progress monitoring was effective in improving the oral reading fluency, and to a lesser degree, reading comprehension, for at risk, beginning bilingual readers (De la Colina, Parker, Hasbrouk, & Lara-Alecio, 2001).
Disfluent ELL often read syllable by syllable in their native language and may attempt to use this strategy while reading in English.
Purposefully partner students to provide ample opportunities for practice in fluent reading (Klingner & Vaughn, 1996).
Fluency and Accuracy in Reading Fluency and Accuracy in Reading Connected Text Connected Text
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 56
Provide opportunities for choral reading. Choral reading encourages ELL students to read
aloud, provides them with models of pronunciation and rhythm for reading, and prepares them to read the selection on their own (Lapp, James, & Tinajero 1994).
Make explicit the skills good readers use and model how they are applied to reading in English.
Provide opportunities for students to reread books using audiotapes (Blum, Koskinen, Tennant, Parker, Straub, & Curry, 1995).
Fluency and Accuracy in Reading Fluency and Accuracy in Reading Connected Text Connected Text
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 57
Provide explicit instruction in comprehension strategies before, during, and after reading.
Use different levels of questions when discussing text.
Be aware of teacher talk that may be confusing to ELL.
Provide support to students by “thinking aloud” (Gersten & Jiménez, 2002).
Preview new concepts. Use photos, artifacts, and hands-on activities before
the lesson and discuss the concepts after the lesson to clarify and review.
Comprehension Skills and StrategiesComprehension Skills and Strategies
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 58
Use semantic maps that delineate an array of relationships (Reyes & Bos, 1998). Use visuals based on text structures such as think
sheets, story maps, because they help students visualize the abstractions of language. Because the spoken word is fleeting, visual aids such as graphic organizers, concept and story maps, and word banks give students a concrete system to process, reflect on, and integrate information (Gersten & Baker, 2000)
Build background knowledge before reading (Saunders, 1998).
Comprehension Skills and StrategiesComprehension Skills and Strategies
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 59
Comprehension Skills and StrategiesComprehension Skills and Strategies
Actively involve all students and summarize
frequently.
Include opportunities for discussions of read
alouds.
Check comprehension and monitor progress
frequently.
Provide explicit instruction in the physical
presentation of text and/or text structure.
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 60
Engaging students in identifying big ideas in a text and in graphically depicting the relationships among these ideas improves student recall and comprehension of text (RAND, 2002).
Teaching comprehension strategies explicitly improves student outcomes.
There is some evidence that ELLs have more difficulty utilizing context than their monolingual peers (Nagy, McClure, & Montserrat, 1997).
Comprehension Skills and StrategiesComprehension Skills and Strategies
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 61
Key features of text that might present difficulty for ELL students
Vocabulary Grammatical structures Cohesive devices Rhetorical devices Phraseological patterning
(Snow & Wong Filmore, 2001)
The following text selections will be used to illustrate these features.
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 62
Vocabulary
Which words and phrases from the Text 4 are associated with a volcano schema?____________________________________
Which words are associated with geology?____________________________________
Words must be considered in their context Examine the phrases in which words are used How would you call attention to these phrases?
___________________________________________
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 63
Grammatical Structure and Devices
“In an attempt to explain the immense power and unpredictable behavior of volcanoes, our ancient
ancestors created myths about evil gods that lived within volcanoes.”
Who was attempting to explain? What does ancient ancestors mean? What were these people attempting to explain? Why were they attempting to explain it? What does “unpredictable behavior” mean? So how did the ancient ancestors explain the power
and unpredictability of the volcanoes? What were the myths about?
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 64
Grammatical Structure and Devices
Once unpacked, the sentence might look like this:“People in ancient times didn’t understand how volcanoes worked and why they were so powerful. They knew they were powerful, but did not know how they got their power. They could not predict what volcanoes would do. They tried to explain volcanoes by inventing stories about them. They created myths about gods. The gods in these myths were evil. These evil gods lived inside the volcanoes?
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 65
Grammatical Structure and Devices
Relative clauses provide explicit information about someone or something.
“Volcanoes that erupt regularly and evil gods that lived within volcanoes”
Other relative pronouns are
who, whom, which, whose X, and whereSnow & Wong Filmore, 2001
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 66
Cohesive Devices
How could you help your students become aware of various sentence structures?
____________________________________________
Why is it important for ELL students to be aware of differing sentence structures?
____________________________________________
Whether sitting in silence or erupting with violence, volcanoes have intrigued people for thousands of years. In an attempt to explain the immense power and unpredictable behavior of volcanoes, our ancient ancestors created myths about evil gods that lived within volcanoes. When angered, the gods would display their fury with eruptions.
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 67
Rhetorical Devices
What is the writer doing here?
“our ancient ancestors created myths” instead of “ancient myths told about…”
Why is it important to bring ELLs attention to this type of rhetorical device?
Why does the author begin two sentences with the word “however”? How is it used and what does it mean?
________________________________________________________________________________________
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText
Baker and Arguelles © 2003 68
Phraseological Patterning
Academic texts often include phrases such as:
“in any given year,”
“in an attempt to explain,”
What other phrases can you find in our sample passage that might be difficult for an ELL student to understand?
______________________________________________________________
Instructional Features in Analyzing Instructional Features in Analyzing TextText