instructional ethology
DESCRIPTION
CNIE 2008: A methodology for analyzing learning design in commercial digital games.TRANSCRIPT
1
Instructional Ethology
Serious Design of Educational Games
Katrin Becker, PhD
2Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
2
IF...
we want to make good instructional games
THENWe need to look at:
1. good instruction2. good games
3Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
3
Good Instruction
4Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
4
Good Games?
5Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
5
One way to do this is....
6Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
6
Studying the
Masters
7Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
7
Why are these such Why are these such good teachers?good teachers?Amos’n’Andy
The West Wing
8Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
8
Who are the “good
teachers” in games?
9Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
9
Are there game masterpieces?
10Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
10
How can we learn
from COTS games?
11Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
11
My Solution........
12Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
12
Analysis of Commercial Games for Learning
Three fundamental assumptions...
1. That players must learn and indeed do learn new things while playing the game;
2. That successful games are successful at least partially because they facilitate that learning; and
3. That it is possible to examine learning in a digital game without associating what is learned with value-laden educational aims.
13Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
13
Players must learn and indeed do learn new things while playing the game;
14Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
14
Learning in Games
• Already Happening
• Learning is what we DO
• Learning is how we win the game.
15Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
15
Successful games are successful at least partially because they facilitate that learning
16Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
16
Successful GamesFacilitat
e
Learning
17Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
17
It is possible to examine learning in a digital game without
associating what is learned with value-laden educational
aims.
18Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
18
Learning vs. Education
Learning
Value-Neutral
Can be Coincidental
Natural
Internally Motivated*
Education
Value-Laden
Deliberate
Coerced/Persuaded
Externally Motivated*
19Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
19
If games teach, how do they do
it?
And......
20Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
20
How do we study “instructional design” in
COTS games?
21Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
21
Black Box Reverse Engineering
Byrne, E. J. (1992). A Conceptual Foundation for Software Re-engineering. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, Orlando, FL, USA, 9-12 Nov 1992, p. 326-335.
22Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
22
Ethology
23Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
23
Ethology
1. Causation. What are the stimuli that elicit the response, and how has it been modified by recent learning?
2. Function: How does the behaviour impact on the animal's chances of survival and reproduction?
3. Development: How does the behaviour change with age, and what early experiences are necessary for the behaviour to be shown?
4. Evolution: How does the behaviour compare with similar behaviour in related species, and how might it have arisen through the process of phylogeny?
24Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
24
Instructional Ethology
25Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
25
Sample Analysis
26Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
26
Analysis: Morphology
• High conceptual coherence– ‘scores’, game
space, set-up, levels
• ‘Standard’ controls
Note: this process is time consuming – goal is to build more detailed queries about behaviour based on the initial observations.
27Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
27
Analysis: Ethology, Causation (Interaction)
• Use rod• Catch fish• Timing• ‘Line of sight’• Position of avatar• Residents talk
about fishing• Some are easy to
catch; others hard• Some are
common; others rare
Not especially interesting at first glance, but behaviour BECOMES interesting when Reviewed in light of other aspects.
28Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
28
Analysis: Ethology, Development (Ontogeny, Game Flow)
• Very little change in the game over the life of the game the change is almost all in the player
• Effect is predictability• Few penalties beyond
immediate one.
29Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
29
Analysis: Ethology, Evolution
• Previous animal crossing (with adaptations for platform)
• Limited RPG style / sim ancestors
• Format: – Changes in choices (options
include only those that make sense)
– Pockets– Currency
30Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
30
Analysis: Ethology, Function (purpose) – how does it help players?
• Size of fish; Location, season, time of day, shape, sound (frog)
• Contests • Collections
– game keeps track for you– Provides 2 ways to collect
• Bells for fish• Experience.....• Minimal penalties for misses• Effort is rewarded
– can always sell what you catch, even if it’s not what you wanted
31Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
31
32Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
32
33Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
33
Next Steps
• Compare good & bad games• Compare Commercial &
Educational Games• More perspectives• More games• Streamline process
34Instructional EthologyKatrin Becker, CNIE 2008
34
Thanks!