instrumental value theory and the human capital of entrepreneurs 26.5.09

Upload: mario-todorov

Post on 24-Feb-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 Instrumental Value Theory and the Human Capital of Entrepreneurs 26.5.09

    1/22

    Instrumental Value Theory and the Human Capital of Entrepreneurs

    Eli Gimmon and Jonathan Levie

    Eli Gimmon is a Lecturer at Tel-Hai Academic College, Israel and Jonathan Levie is a Reader in the Hunter Centre forEntrepreneurship, niversit! of "trathcl!de# The authors $ould li%e to than% the t$o anon!mous revie$ers and theeditor of the Journal of Economic Issues for their comments#

    Abstract: Given the contribution of Schumpeterian entrepreneurship to technological

    progress and well-being, the accuracy of investment decisions by venture capitalists is a

    societal issue. Venture capitalists nd the human capital of entrepreneurs dicult to assess.

    This paper employs instrumental value theory to assess the value of dierent human capital

    factors to the performance of new ventures. ! meta-analysis of "# previous empirical studies

    that e$amined the eect of founder%s human capital on new venture performance suggested

    that instrumental value theory holds promise as a guide for research on entrepreneurs%

    human capital and new venture performance. &t could also help venture capitalists to ma'e

    better investment decisions, beneting society in general.

    ey!ords: instrumental value theory, entrepreneurship, human capital

    JEL Classi"cation Codes: ("), ()", *"+, , "

    &n institutional economics, entrepreneurs are seen to play a critical role in the conversion of

    technological progress into economic development and human well-being /c0aniel "112

    "11)2 3lein #445. !lthough !lfred arshall and Thorstein Veblen recogni6ed this in the # th

    century, 7oseph Schumpeter /#82 #85 was the rst to describe the role of innovative

    entrepreneurs in the evolution of the economy in detail. Schumpeterian entrepreneurs

    disrupt the status 9uo by introducing new and better ways of doing things. This typically

    re9uires considerable investment of resources to succeed /see 7avary "118 for an e$ample5.

    :or a new venture with little internal nancial reserves to draw on, this means e$ternal

    0

  • 7/25/2019 Instrumental Value Theory and the Human Capital of Entrepreneurs 26.5.09

    2/22

    funding. !s Schumpeter himself pointed out, ;credit is primarily necessary to new

    combinations< /Schumpeter #8, =15.

    !t the e$treme end of Schumpeterian entrepreneurship are new ventures that are so

    innovative and asset-poor that conventional debt nance is not appropriate. ! completely

    dierent form of funding is re9uired, one that shares in the upside gain but also accepts the

    downside ris'. This is venture capital. To illustrate how unusual this form of nancing is, only

    around 4> of !merican start-up funding needs are met by venture capital /?eynolds "11=5.

    @f the " million or so start-up attempts in the Anited States each year, only around 411 are

    invested in by venture capitalists, yet venture-capital-bac'ed rms provide 4> of Bobs in A.S.

    businesses /Shane "1145. !vailability of e$ternal capital, then, is a critical institutional factor

    for Schumpeterian entrepreneurship.

    The accuracy of venture capitalists in pic'ing which Schumpeterian entrepreneurs to

    bac' is a societal issue, since poor Budgment will lead to a loss of the benets that society

    can reap from technological progress. Cot only will society not gain from the innovations

    these Schumpeterian entrepreneurs see' to introduce, but the venture capitalists will nd

    their sources of capital drying up as their losses induce fund managers to invest their money

    elsewhere. uch decision-ma'ing in venture capital is based on intuition and herd behavior

    /Dider ##45. ! wide range of evidence suggests that the accuracy of venture capitalists%

    predictions is not high, with a small number of spectacular successes boosting the return

    rates of some funds and mas'ing a low overall ;hit< rate in the industry /Dachara'is and

    eyer "1115. &ndeed, following poor returns, investment in seed and early-stage private

    sector venture capital funding has been in relative decline recently, particularly in Europe

    /7FFs'elFinen, aula and urray "11=5. &n summary, given the economic importance of

    Schumpeterian entrepreneurship and its dependence on substantial e9uity funding,

    investment choice by venture capitalists is worthy of attention, particularly given the interest

    of institutional economists in value and Budgment.

    Venture capitalists invest based on their Budgment of the human and social capital of the

    entrepreneur/s5, the potential in the technology and the potential in the mar'et /Dachara'is

    1

  • 7/25/2019 Instrumental Value Theory and the Human Capital of Entrepreneurs 26.5.09

    3/22

    and Shepherd "11)5. @ne of the most dicult issues for many venture capitalists is

    assessing the human capital of the founder /*evie and Gimmon "1145. uman capital

    /(ec'er #=)5 has more generally been recogni6ed as a 'ey success factor in new venture

    performance /Stuart and !betti #4=2 art, Stevenson and 0ial ##)5. ! surprising feature of

    the human capital literature is that there appears to be no e$-ante method of predicting

    which of the dierent forms of human capital commonly employed in the entrepreneurship

    literature, and by investors in new ventures, might be e$pected to have an eect on

    performance. &n other words, no commonly accepted theory is routinely used to sort or

    classify founder%s human capital factors e$-ante as relevant or irrelevant to venture

    performance.

    He propose the use of instrumental value theory as interpreted by 7. :agg :oster /Tool

    ##a2 ?anson "1145 as a tool for e&-ante prediction of the eect of dierent forms of

    human capital on new venture performance. &n this article, we test its ability to predict

    performance through a meta-analysis of published empirical studies of founder%s human

    capital and performance. He argue that the use of instrumental value theory is valid in this

    case because accurate choice of Schumpeterian entrepreneurs by venture capitalists is in

    the interests of society generally, not Bust venture capitalists.

    !s (aldwin ?anson /"1145 has remar'ed with specic reference to instrumental value

    theory, applicability is the nal test of the correctness of theories. !lthough applying

    instrumental value theory as an aid to e&-anteprediction might appear to violate 0eweyan

    principles that conte$t is 'ey /0ewey ##2 Gordon ##15 and that instrumental value is

    dynamic /3lein #445, we argue that by applying it in the narrow case of new venture

    performance, and remaining sensitive to alternative interpretations, some degree of useful

    generali6ation is possible. He nd the instrumental criterion helpful as a way of ordering, as

    a rst appro$imation, the value of dierent forms of human capital to Schumpeterian

    entrepreneurship, while recogni6ing that this approach has its critics.

    This study aims to ma'e a contribution to instrumental value theory through illustrating

    its value in classifying human capital that is useful for predicting new venture performance.

    2

  • 7/25/2019 Instrumental Value Theory and the Human Capital of Entrepreneurs 26.5.09

    4/22

    This is important because there are many forms of human capital, and a classication

    enables a theory-driven focus on the human capital that really matters in a particular

    conte$t. The paper also answers a call for further meta-analysis in economics /Iressman and

    ontecinos ##+, 4=#5. ! third contribution is to suggest how the instrumental value

    framewor' can guide further research in areas that have not been addressed before, for

    e$ample by separating out the instrumental and ceremonial value of social capital factors

    such as reputation.

    Instrumental Value Theory and #e! Venture $erformance

    Veblen%s recognition of the importance of technological innovation to social progress, and

    how such progress can be hindered, is a central concern of institutionalism. @ne way in

    which progress can be hindered is what Jlarence !yres /#+, 5 refers to as ceremonial

    ade9uacy,< a 'ind of imitation of technological ade9uacy. e illustrated this with the

    following e$ampleK ;The tribal medicine man purports to be altering the course of events in

    imitation of the tool activities by which technicians really do alter the course of events.

    ?ecogni6ing it ma'es possible a clear dierentiation of technological reality from ceremonial

    fantasy, and so the real values from fancies, or pseudo values.