insurance coverage litigation.i

Upload: jg-gerry-schulze

Post on 30-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    1/75

    INSURANCE COVERAGE

    LITIGATION

    Little Rock

    April 6

    Crown Plaza Little Rock201 S. Shackleford, Little Rock AR 72211

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    2/75

    INSURANCE COVERAGELITIGATION

    COMMON KINDS OF INSURANCE

    COVERAGE DISPUTES J. G. Gerry Schulze

    Baker & Schulze

    [email protected]

    501 537-1000

    501 537-1016

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    3/75

    COMMON KINDS OF DISPUTES

    Basic Principles Underlying All Insurance

    Coverage Disputes

    Insurance is a contract Insurance is a contract of adhesion

    This just means take it or leave it.

    Insurance is heavily regulated by the state

    23-65-101. Unauthorized insurance transactionsprohibited.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    4/75

    Basic Principles

    Read the statute and read the policy

    The statute controls

    If a statute requires a policy to contain a provision,the policy is deemed to contain the provision.

    Whether its there or not.

    Public policy may controlbut not often.

    If the law is silent on the matter, the contractcontrols.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    5/75

    Hiram Tweedle Hypothetical

    Okay, this isnt even close. I

    tried to do a cartoon, but it

    didnt work.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    6/75

    Hiram Tweedle Hypothetical

    What kind of insurance might be involved

    here?

    Workers compensation This seems pretty elementary

    Liability against Bananaberry

    Homeowners?

    Commercial General Liability? Directors and Officers Liability?

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    7/75

    Possible exclusions

    Homeowners

    Business pursuits

    Hes throwing business documents out the window

    Criminal Act?

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    8/75

    Exclusions

    2. Exclusions

    This insurance does not apply to:

    c. Dishonest, malicious, fraudulent, criminal or

    intentional acts, errors or omissions. However, this

    exclusion does not apply to you if such acts, errors

    or omissions were committed by your employee(other than a partner, director, executive officer, or

    stockholder) without your direction or knowledge.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    9/75

    Exclusions

    Paragraph B. EXCLUSIONS is amended by

    the addition of the following:

    This additional insurance does not apply tothe cost of defending:

    1. Any dishonest, fraudulent, intentional, or

    criminal act or omission committed by you or at

    your direction;

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    10/75

    Ordinary Sense

    First, a policy is interpreted in its ordinary and

    popular sense.

    The context is not forgotten. When wordshave a special meaning in the context of

    insurance, that special meaning will not be

    ignored.

    Example: loss

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    11/75

    Elements of Insurance

    Risk Distribution

    Among a substantial number of members

    Through an insurer engaged primarily in the

    business of insurance

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    12/75

    Risk Distribution

    Risk: According to Blacks

    The chance of injury, damage, or loss

    The chance or degree of probability of loss tothe subject matter of an insurance policy

    The amount that an insurer stands to lose

    A person or thing that an insurer considers a

    hazard The type of loss covered by a policy

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    13/75

    Who will suffer the risk?

    Without insurance, the unlucky person who

    suffers the misfortune

    A person who intentionally or negligentlyproximately causes the misfortune to occur to

    others

    Under certain statutory schemes, the party the

    legislature decides should bear the loss

    (Workers Compensation, e.g)

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    14/75

    What risk can be transferred?

    Obviously, the actual misfortune cannot be

    transferred. If someone runs over me in the

    parking lot and breaks my leg, I cant transfer

    the broken leg to him

    Economic loss, and economic compensation

    for other losses is all we can transfer.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    15/75

    Insurance transfers risk

    Insurer work on the basis of statistics

    Actuaries calculate the risk of certain

    eventualities over the population of theinsured

    Insurers fix premium rates to cover losses,

    administrative costs, and other costs

    Bonuses for insurance executives, for example

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    16/75

    Rate Filing

    Insurers file

    with the

    Arkansas

    Insurance

    Commission

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    17/75

    Factors in calculating risk

    To figure out a premium the actuary has to

    consider

    What is the risk to be covered? How frequently will the risk occur?

    How much will it cost to cover the risk?

    What will it cost to administer the program?

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    18/75

    The Insurer

    Primarily in the business of insurance

    Compare warranties on merchandise

    An insurer is in the business of insuring againstrisk of loss

    A manufacturer can guarantee that its widgets will

    work. There is always a risk that the widgets

    wont work. If that risk occurs, the insurer willreplace the widgets. But the manufacturer isnt

    really an insurer

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    19/75

    Underwriters

    Underwriting in this context is just the act of

    assuming a risk by insuring it

    The insurer assumes liability to pay theproceeds on loss

    Historically, there were mutual assessment

    associations. Sometimes it was hard to collect

    when members were assessed. Thats where

    the underwriter came in.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    20/75

    Underwriting

    Lloyds Coffee House in

    London, 1600s, shippers

    would pass around a slip of

    paper with relevant facts.Interested person would write

    on the slip the amount of

    insurance, the rate, and his

    initials. Hence: Underwriting.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    21/75

    Types of Insurance

    In theory just about anything legal could be

    insured

    In practice most insurance actually writtencan be categorized as:

    Life Insurance

    Fire and Casualty Insurance

    Marine and Inland Marine Insurance

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    22/75

    Life Insurance

    Pay on deatheasy enough

    Who is involved:

    Insurer Owner of the policywho can change

    beneficiary

    Owner often is, but is not always the subject of

    the policy, the cestui que vie Beneficiary Who is paid in the event of loss

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    23/75

    Fire and Casualty

    Fire

    Pretty simple concept

    Except that by now this

    insurance also can coverother losses such asweather (lightning, water,etc). There is alsoearthquake, riot, etc.insurance available.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    24/75

    Casualty

    Liability

    Theft/burglary

    Accident

    Health Property damage

    Workers Compensation

    Fidelity and surety bonds

    Car insurance Boat / airplane insurance

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    25/75

    Marine Insurance

    Perils of the sea

    Fairly comprehensive, covering all losses

    except those excluded. Similar, Inland Marine Insurance, covers gaps

    between seas and docks.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    26/75

    Yacht Insurance Policy

    PERILS

    Upon the Hull, Spars, Sails, Tackle, Apparel, Machinery, Boats, and otherFurniture of and in the Yacht hereby insured.

    Touching the adventures and perils which we, the Assurers, are contentedto bear, and do take upon us, they are of the

    seas, men-of-war, fire, enemies, pirates, rovers, assailing thieves, jettisons,letters of mart and countermart, reprisals,

    takings at sea, arrests, restraints and detainments of all kings, princes andpeople, of what nation, condition or quality

    soever, barratry of the Master and Mariners, and of all other like perils,losses and misfortunes, that have or shall

    come to the hurt, detriment or damage of saidY

    acht or any part thereof.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    27/75

    Floater policies

    All risk insurance on personal property not

    situated at a fixed location. Another kind of

    inland marine insurance.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    28/75

    No fault Compensation

    Workers Compensation

    Automobile No Fault

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    29/75

    Policy language: Liability Insurance

    The company will pay on behalf of the

    insured all sums which the insured shall

    become legally obligated to pay as damages

    because of ... the property damage to which

    this insurance applies, caused by an

    occurrence.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    30/75

    Occurrence

    An accident, including continuous repeated

    exposure to conditions, which results in

    bodily injury or property damage, neither

    expected nor intended from the standpoint of

    insured.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    31/75

    Language of Insurance Policies

    Legal Language is a dialect of English

    Special meaning of words--jargon

    Special constructions Subjunctive more common

    Struggle for more precision in language

    Use of magic words

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    32/75

    Plain Language

    The standardized insurance policies aresomewhat plainer than the old ones were

    They are still necessarily confusing, because

    their topics are confusing

    Pay careful attention to the definitions.

    Vizzini:HE DIDN'T FALL?INCONCEIVABLE.Inigo Montoya:You keep using that word. I donot think it means what you think it means.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    33/75

    Ambiguity

    If there is an ambiguity, the contract is

    construed in the light most favorable to the

    insured.

    In most cases, this is the application of the

    contra proferentem rule.

    The fact is that the language of most insurance

    policies is drafted not only before the insured isidentified, but sometimes before even the insurer

    is identified.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    34/75

    Ambiguity

    The rule that a policy is construed in the light

    most favorable to the insured doesnt apply

    unless there is an ambiguity in the first place

    An ambiguity occurs when the language is

    capable of more than one meaning when read

    in context.

    A contract must be interpreted to give effect to allits provisions

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    35/75

    What is ambiguity

    Ambiguity

    Lack of precision and clarity.

    When a reasonable person can understand your

    writing in more than one way.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    36/75

    Ambiguous words

    Example: biweekly. Main Entry: 1biweekly Pronunciation Guide

    Pronunciation: ( )b +Function: adjectiveEtymology: 1bi- + weekly1 : occurring or appearing every two weeks : having a 2-week interval between recurrences : FORTNIGHTLY --now usually used with this meaning in respect to

    publication dates; compareSEMIWEEKLY2 : occurring or appearing twice aweek: SEMIWEEKLY -- used especially of

    transportation schedules "biweekly." Webster's Third New International

    Dictionary, Unabridged. Merriam-Webster, 2002.http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com (3 Mar. 2010).

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    37/75

    Ambiguous punctuation

    Its easier if we step away from insurance for a

    moment. The witness identified defendant Jones, the butler,

    defendant Smith, the cook, and defendant Brown, the

    gardener.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    38/75

    You can fix that, of course.

    Example of the use of semicolon to distinguish

    separate elements

    Correct:

    The witness identified defendant Jones, the butler;

    defendant Smith, the cook; and defendant Brown, the

    gardener.

    Incorrect:

    The witness identified defendant Jones, the butler,

    defendant Smith, the cook, and defendant Brown, the

    gardener.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    39/75

    NOUN PLAGUE

    The National Highway Traffic Safety

    Administrations automobile seat belt interlock

    rule. Garner, Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage, s.v. Noun

    Plague.

    baseball game ticket price increase proposal

    Raymond P. Ward, For the Defense, Dec. 2005, at 74(DRI 2005).

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    40/75

    Some contracts can be interpreted bya jury

    Where interpretation of a contract depends on

    other evidence, such as parol evidence, a jurymay be able to interpret a contract

    That is unlikely to happen with insurance.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    41/75

    Insurance Policies are Interpreted by

    the Court An insurance policy is to be interpreted by the

    court as a matter of law. Smith v. Prudential

    Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 340 Ark. 335, 10

    S.W.3d 846(2000) overrulingFarm Bureau

    Mut. Ins. Co. v. Whitten, 51 Ark. App. 124,

    126-27, 911 S.W.2d 270, 271 (1995).

    Whitten created some confusion because itsuggested that sometimes the interpretation of an

    insurance contract could be left up to a jury

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    42/75

    Distinguish ERISA

    Employee benefit plans governed by the

    Employee Retirement Income Security Act of

    1974 are not governed by insurance law, but

    by ERISA. All these rules of construction go

    out the window.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    43/75

    Parties to an Insurance Policy

    Insurance Company

    Insured

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    44/75

    Others involved

    Claimant/Plaintiff (Third Party)

    Insurance Agent or Broker

    Lawyers

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    45/75

    Structure of an Insurance Policy

    DECLARATIONS PAGE

    Usually stapled to the front

    Blanks filled in for

    Name of insured

    Policy number

    Limits of coverage

    Policy period

    Lists of which documents constitute the policy

    Coverage provided

    Name of agent

    Logo and catchy slogan

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    46/75

    Structure of an Insurance Policy

    Contract (Usually Preprinted)

    Insuring Agreement

    Definitions

    Grant of Coverage

    Exclusions

    Conditions

    Conditions precedent

    Conditions Subsequent Covenants

    Endorsements

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    47/75

    Structure of an Insurance Policy

    Standardized Forms

    The insuring agreements are almost alwaysstandardized forms.

    The Insurance Services Office writes a lot ofthem, but there are other trade associations as well

    Mutual Insurance Rating Bureau

    Insurance Rating Bureau

    National Bureau of Casualty Underwriters Confederated Gobbledygook and Boilerplate

    Conglomerate

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    48/75

    Significance

    The Insured has the burden of proof on coverage

    The Insurer has the burden of proof on exclusions

    With a condition precedent, the insurer need not

    prove prejudice. All the insurer must show is that

    the condition precedent was not met.Fireman's

    Fund Ins. Co. v. Care Mgmt., 2010 Ark. 110.

    Decided after the written materials were written. March 4,

    2010. See the footnote on p. 17. I guessed wrong. TheEighth Circuit guessed right. All I guessed wrong on was

    the insurers strategy, though.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    49/75

    Typical exclusions

    Intentional Act

    Exclusions There are certain instances which we do not

    intend to cover for liability. Under this policy, liability to

    others and medical expenses do not apply to personalinjury or property damage:

    1. Which is expected or intended by an insured.

    CNA Ins. Co. v. McGinnis, 10 Ark. App. 234, 663 S.W.2d 182

    (1994) rev'd CNA Ins. Co. v. McGinnis, 282 Ark. 90, 666 S.W.2d

    689 (1984).

    The test is whether a plain ordinary person would expect

    and intend damage to result from the actions involved.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    50/75

    Typical Conditions

    Notice

    Inventory

    Cooperation

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    51/75

    Typical Endorsements

    Additional coverage

    Commercial policy, computer equipment, etc.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    52/75

    Significance

    I dont think the Arkansas Courts have given

    extraordinary weight to the simple location in

    a policy of a particular provision.

    Courts in other states have rejected the idea

    that you can assign burdens of proof

    reflexively just based on where in a policy a

    particular provision is found. Appleman 3.07-[1].

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    53/75

    Lines of Insurance

    Homeowners

    Casualty/Indemnity

    Automobile Commercial

    Life

    Disability

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    54/75

    FIRST PARTY COVERAGE

    Identifying the insured

    Declarations page

    Definitions page

    Insuring agreement

    IV. DEFINITION OF INSURED

    The unqualified word "INSURED" includes the named insured

    and if the named insured is an individual, his spouse anddependent children residing in the household and also includes: *

    * * *

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    55/75

    Insured

    . . . "insured" means a person or organization

    described under "Persons Insured"; . . .

    Persons Insured: The following are insureds under

    Part 1: * * * (2) any other person using such

    automobile with the permission of the named

    insured, provided his actual operation or (if he is not

    operating) his other actual use thereof is within thescope of such permission, and . . . .

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    56/75

    Insured

    In business policies, an insured may be

    defined as including, "your employees, other

    than your executive directors, but only for

    acts within the course and scope of their

    employment by you.

    Tri-State Ins. Co. v. Sing, 41 Ark. App. 142, 850

    S.W.2d 6 (1993).

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    57/75

    Acts of an insured

    An insurance policy which contains an

    exclusion for acts of "an insured" can refuse

    to pay an innocent insured if the acts of a

    guilty "insured" void the policy.

    Noland v. Farmers Insurance Company, 319 Ark.

    449, 892 S.W.2d 271 (1995).

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    58/75

    Separation of Insureds provision

    Except with respect to the limits of insurance,

    and any rights or duties specifically assigned

    in this coverage part to the first Named

    Insured, this insurance applies:

    (a) As if each named Insured were the only named

    Insured: and

    (b) Separately to each Insured against whomclaim is made or suit is brought.

    Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire

    Insurance Co., 842 F.Supp. 1151 (W.D.Ark. 1994).

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    59/75

    Cause of Loss

    Definition of occurrence in policy.

    "an accident, including continuous or repeated

    exposure to substantially the same general and

    harmful conditions, which results in bodily

    injury or property damage neither expected

    nor intended from the standpoint of the

    insured."

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    60/75

    Definition of Damage

    Property damage in the policy is defined as:

    (1) Physical injury to or destruction of tangible

    property which occurs during the policy period,

    including the loss of use thereof at any time resultingtherefrom, or

    (2) Loss of use of tangible property which has not

    been physically injured or destroyed provided such

    loss of use is caused by an occurrence during thepolicy period.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    61/75

    First Party Coverage

    Protects insureds or their heirs from losses

    Health Insurance

    Disability Insurance

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    62/75

    Third Party Coverage

    Liability Coverage

    Automobile

    Workers Compensation Property Insurance

    Homeowners

    Commercial

    Professional Liability

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    63/75

    Policies that provide both

    As a practical matter, in most circumstances,

    if an entity needs first party coverage, he, she,

    or it needs third party coverage too.

    Many policies have provisions that provide

    both First Party and Third Party coverage

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    64/75

    Homeowners Policies

    First Party coverage on dwelling

    Property damagephysical injury to, destruction of,or loss of use of tangible property. Fire, storm, etc.

    Exclusions Earth movement

    Collapse

    Mold

    War, nuclear hazard Flood

    Business

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    65/75

    Exclusion: Criminal Acts

    We do not cover any bodily injury or property damage intended by, orwhich may reasonably be expected to result from the intentional orcriminal acts or omissions of, any insured person. This exclusion applieseven if:

    (a) such insured person lacks the mental capacity to govern his or herconduct;

    * * * * * *

    (c) such bodily injury or property damage is sustained by a differentperson than intended or reasonably expected; . . .

    This exclusion applies regardless of whether or not such insured person isactually charged with, or convicted of, a crime.

    Allstate Insurance Company v. Burroughs, 914 F. Supp. 308 (W.D. Ark.,1996)

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    66/75

    Exclusion: Business Pursuits

    Business pursuits

    This exclusion provides that the liability coveragedoes not apply "to bodily injury or property

    damage arising out of business pursuits exceptactivities therein which are ordinarily incident tonon-business pursuits." U.S.Fire Insurance Co. v.Reynolds, 11 Ark. App. 141, 667 S.W.2d 664(1984).

    As you can see, there is an exclusion, and anexception to the exclusion.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    67/75

    Commercial General Policies

    Insured: Business, officers, directors, owners,

    Perils: fire, lightning, explosions, theft, smoke

    Exclusions, riot, volcanoes, collapse, etc.

    Coverage for Bodily Injury claims

    Personal Injury Term of art, intangible injuries

    including false arrest, false detention, false

    imprisonment, etc.

    Advertising injury.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    68/75

    Exclusion: Automobile

    Typical exclusion

    Automobile:

    This policy does not apply to bodily injury or property

    damage arising out of the ownership, maintenanceoperation, use, loading or unloading of any motorvehicle owned or operated by, or rented or loaned toany insured; but this provision does not apply to bodilyinjury or property damage occurring on the residentpremises if the motor vehicle is not subject to motorvehicle registration because it is used exclusively onthe residence premises or kept in dead storage on theresidence premises.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    69/75

    Pollution exclusions

    It is agreed that the exclusion relating to the actual, alleged orthreatened discharge, dispersal, release or escape of pollutantsis replaced by the following: (1) Bodily injury or property damage arising out of the actual, alleged

    or threatened discharge, dispersal, release or escape of pollutants.

    (2) Any loss, cost or expense arising out of any governmentaldirection or request that the named insured test for, monitor, clean up,remove contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize pollutants.

    Subparagraph (1) above does not apply to bodily injury or propertydamage caused by heat, smoke or fumes from a hostile fire. As used inthis exclusion, a hostile fire means one which becomes uncontrollable,or breaks out from where it was intended to be.

    Pollutants means any solid, liquid, gaseous thermal irritant orcontaminant, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis,chemicals and waste.

    Waste includes materials to be recycled, reconditioned or reclaimed.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    70/75

    Exclusion: GroomingThis insurance does not apply to bodily injury, property damage,

    personal injury or advertising injury

    arising out of:

    1. The rendering of or failure to render any service, treatment, advice orinstruction related to: a. Any hair removal by electrolysis or any surgical procedure to remove or

    replace hair;

    b. Any application of permanent cosmetic makeup, tattoos or otherimplantation of pigments into skin pores;

    c. Any invasive medical or surgical procedure to improve or alter theappearance of skin, including but not limited to injections, chemical peels,dermabrasion, laser surgery or cryosurgery;

    d. Body piercing, other than piercing of ears;

    e. Diet or physical fitness; however, this exclusion does not apply to theuse of physical fitness facilities if the user is not under the directsupervision of a personal trainer;

    f. Chiropody; or

    g. Tanning the skin; or

    (From a hotel policy)From my legal malpractice policy.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    71/75

    Directors and Officers

    Side A coverage covers losses directlyincurred by the directors and officers whichthe corporation is not required or allowed to

    pay. Side B reimburses the corporation for losses

    incurred by the directors and officers that thecorporation is allowed to pay.

    Side C arose when corporations noticed thatthere was no coverage for their own out of

    pocket losses, which could be substantial.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    72/75

    Errors and Omissions

    Professional liability insurance for:

    Doctors

    Architects Engineers

    Surveyors, accountants, lawyers, agents,

    brokers, bankers, and the like

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    73/75

    Occurrence versus Claims Made

    An occurrence policy covers the insured for

    any occurrence that happens while the policy

    is in force

    A claims made policy covers the insured for

    any claim made while the policy is in force.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    74/75

    Construction Defect

    D. Construction Defect(s) means any actual or allegeddefective, faulty, or delayed construction or any other matterconstituting a construction defect under applicable law,regardless of whether it results from:

    (1)defective or incorrect architectural plans or other designs,

    (2)defective or improper soil testing,

    (3)defective, inadequate or insufficient protection fromsubsoil or earth movement or subsidence,

    (4)construction, manufacture or assembly of any tangibleproperty,

    (5)the failure to provide or pay for any construction-relatedgoods or services, or

    (6)the supervision or management of any construction-relatedactivities.

  • 8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i

    75/75

    Back to Bananaberry analysis

    Is there a homeowners claim here?

    Is he engaged in business or is he just cleaningout his house?

    Is there a criminal acts exclusion? If neither exclusion is good, why should the

    plaintiff bother suing the insurance company?

    Bananaberrys got money. Let him collect from

    his insurer.

    Penalty and attorneys fees.