insurance coverage litigation.i
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
1/75
INSURANCE COVERAGE
LITIGATION
Little Rock
April 6
Crown Plaza Little Rock201 S. Shackleford, Little Rock AR 72211
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
2/75
INSURANCE COVERAGELITIGATION
COMMON KINDS OF INSURANCE
COVERAGE DISPUTES J. G. Gerry Schulze
Baker & Schulze
501 537-1000
501 537-1016
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
3/75
COMMON KINDS OF DISPUTES
Basic Principles Underlying All Insurance
Coverage Disputes
Insurance is a contract Insurance is a contract of adhesion
This just means take it or leave it.
Insurance is heavily regulated by the state
23-65-101. Unauthorized insurance transactionsprohibited.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
4/75
Basic Principles
Read the statute and read the policy
The statute controls
If a statute requires a policy to contain a provision,the policy is deemed to contain the provision.
Whether its there or not.
Public policy may controlbut not often.
If the law is silent on the matter, the contractcontrols.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
5/75
Hiram Tweedle Hypothetical
Okay, this isnt even close. I
tried to do a cartoon, but it
didnt work.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
6/75
Hiram Tweedle Hypothetical
What kind of insurance might be involved
here?
Workers compensation This seems pretty elementary
Liability against Bananaberry
Homeowners?
Commercial General Liability? Directors and Officers Liability?
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
7/75
Possible exclusions
Homeowners
Business pursuits
Hes throwing business documents out the window
Criminal Act?
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
8/75
Exclusions
2. Exclusions
This insurance does not apply to:
c. Dishonest, malicious, fraudulent, criminal or
intentional acts, errors or omissions. However, this
exclusion does not apply to you if such acts, errors
or omissions were committed by your employee(other than a partner, director, executive officer, or
stockholder) without your direction or knowledge.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
9/75
Exclusions
Paragraph B. EXCLUSIONS is amended by
the addition of the following:
This additional insurance does not apply tothe cost of defending:
1. Any dishonest, fraudulent, intentional, or
criminal act or omission committed by you or at
your direction;
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
10/75
Ordinary Sense
First, a policy is interpreted in its ordinary and
popular sense.
The context is not forgotten. When wordshave a special meaning in the context of
insurance, that special meaning will not be
ignored.
Example: loss
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
11/75
Elements of Insurance
Risk Distribution
Among a substantial number of members
Through an insurer engaged primarily in the
business of insurance
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
12/75
Risk Distribution
Risk: According to Blacks
The chance of injury, damage, or loss
The chance or degree of probability of loss tothe subject matter of an insurance policy
The amount that an insurer stands to lose
A person or thing that an insurer considers a
hazard The type of loss covered by a policy
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
13/75
Who will suffer the risk?
Without insurance, the unlucky person who
suffers the misfortune
A person who intentionally or negligentlyproximately causes the misfortune to occur to
others
Under certain statutory schemes, the party the
legislature decides should bear the loss
(Workers Compensation, e.g)
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
14/75
What risk can be transferred?
Obviously, the actual misfortune cannot be
transferred. If someone runs over me in the
parking lot and breaks my leg, I cant transfer
the broken leg to him
Economic loss, and economic compensation
for other losses is all we can transfer.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
15/75
Insurance transfers risk
Insurer work on the basis of statistics
Actuaries calculate the risk of certain
eventualities over the population of theinsured
Insurers fix premium rates to cover losses,
administrative costs, and other costs
Bonuses for insurance executives, for example
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
16/75
Rate Filing
Insurers file
with the
Arkansas
Insurance
Commission
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
17/75
Factors in calculating risk
To figure out a premium the actuary has to
consider
What is the risk to be covered? How frequently will the risk occur?
How much will it cost to cover the risk?
What will it cost to administer the program?
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
18/75
The Insurer
Primarily in the business of insurance
Compare warranties on merchandise
An insurer is in the business of insuring againstrisk of loss
A manufacturer can guarantee that its widgets will
work. There is always a risk that the widgets
wont work. If that risk occurs, the insurer willreplace the widgets. But the manufacturer isnt
really an insurer
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
19/75
Underwriters
Underwriting in this context is just the act of
assuming a risk by insuring it
The insurer assumes liability to pay theproceeds on loss
Historically, there were mutual assessment
associations. Sometimes it was hard to collect
when members were assessed. Thats where
the underwriter came in.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
20/75
Underwriting
Lloyds Coffee House in
London, 1600s, shippers
would pass around a slip of
paper with relevant facts.Interested person would write
on the slip the amount of
insurance, the rate, and his
initials. Hence: Underwriting.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
21/75
Types of Insurance
In theory just about anything legal could be
insured
In practice most insurance actually writtencan be categorized as:
Life Insurance
Fire and Casualty Insurance
Marine and Inland Marine Insurance
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
22/75
Life Insurance
Pay on deatheasy enough
Who is involved:
Insurer Owner of the policywho can change
beneficiary
Owner often is, but is not always the subject of
the policy, the cestui que vie Beneficiary Who is paid in the event of loss
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
23/75
Fire and Casualty
Fire
Pretty simple concept
Except that by now this
insurance also can coverother losses such asweather (lightning, water,etc). There is alsoearthquake, riot, etc.insurance available.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
24/75
Casualty
Liability
Theft/burglary
Accident
Health Property damage
Workers Compensation
Fidelity and surety bonds
Car insurance Boat / airplane insurance
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
25/75
Marine Insurance
Perils of the sea
Fairly comprehensive, covering all losses
except those excluded. Similar, Inland Marine Insurance, covers gaps
between seas and docks.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
26/75
Yacht Insurance Policy
PERILS
Upon the Hull, Spars, Sails, Tackle, Apparel, Machinery, Boats, and otherFurniture of and in the Yacht hereby insured.
Touching the adventures and perils which we, the Assurers, are contentedto bear, and do take upon us, they are of the
seas, men-of-war, fire, enemies, pirates, rovers, assailing thieves, jettisons,letters of mart and countermart, reprisals,
takings at sea, arrests, restraints and detainments of all kings, princes andpeople, of what nation, condition or quality
soever, barratry of the Master and Mariners, and of all other like perils,losses and misfortunes, that have or shall
come to the hurt, detriment or damage of saidY
acht or any part thereof.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
27/75
Floater policies
All risk insurance on personal property not
situated at a fixed location. Another kind of
inland marine insurance.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
28/75
No fault Compensation
Workers Compensation
Automobile No Fault
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
29/75
Policy language: Liability Insurance
The company will pay on behalf of the
insured all sums which the insured shall
become legally obligated to pay as damages
because of ... the property damage to which
this insurance applies, caused by an
occurrence.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
30/75
Occurrence
An accident, including continuous repeated
exposure to conditions, which results in
bodily injury or property damage, neither
expected nor intended from the standpoint of
insured.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
31/75
Language of Insurance Policies
Legal Language is a dialect of English
Special meaning of words--jargon
Special constructions Subjunctive more common
Struggle for more precision in language
Use of magic words
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
32/75
Plain Language
The standardized insurance policies aresomewhat plainer than the old ones were
They are still necessarily confusing, because
their topics are confusing
Pay careful attention to the definitions.
Vizzini:HE DIDN'T FALL?INCONCEIVABLE.Inigo Montoya:You keep using that word. I donot think it means what you think it means.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
33/75
Ambiguity
If there is an ambiguity, the contract is
construed in the light most favorable to the
insured.
In most cases, this is the application of the
contra proferentem rule.
The fact is that the language of most insurance
policies is drafted not only before the insured isidentified, but sometimes before even the insurer
is identified.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
34/75
Ambiguity
The rule that a policy is construed in the light
most favorable to the insured doesnt apply
unless there is an ambiguity in the first place
An ambiguity occurs when the language is
capable of more than one meaning when read
in context.
A contract must be interpreted to give effect to allits provisions
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
35/75
What is ambiguity
Ambiguity
Lack of precision and clarity.
When a reasonable person can understand your
writing in more than one way.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
36/75
Ambiguous words
Example: biweekly. Main Entry: 1biweekly Pronunciation Guide
Pronunciation: ( )b +Function: adjectiveEtymology: 1bi- + weekly1 : occurring or appearing every two weeks : having a 2-week interval between recurrences : FORTNIGHTLY --now usually used with this meaning in respect to
publication dates; compareSEMIWEEKLY2 : occurring or appearing twice aweek: SEMIWEEKLY -- used especially of
transportation schedules "biweekly." Webster's Third New International
Dictionary, Unabridged. Merriam-Webster, 2002.http://unabridged.merriam-webster.com (3 Mar. 2010).
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
37/75
Ambiguous punctuation
Its easier if we step away from insurance for a
moment. The witness identified defendant Jones, the butler,
defendant Smith, the cook, and defendant Brown, the
gardener.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
38/75
You can fix that, of course.
Example of the use of semicolon to distinguish
separate elements
Correct:
The witness identified defendant Jones, the butler;
defendant Smith, the cook; and defendant Brown, the
gardener.
Incorrect:
The witness identified defendant Jones, the butler,
defendant Smith, the cook, and defendant Brown, the
gardener.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
39/75
NOUN PLAGUE
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administrations automobile seat belt interlock
rule. Garner, Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage, s.v. Noun
Plague.
baseball game ticket price increase proposal
Raymond P. Ward, For the Defense, Dec. 2005, at 74(DRI 2005).
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
40/75
Some contracts can be interpreted bya jury
Where interpretation of a contract depends on
other evidence, such as parol evidence, a jurymay be able to interpret a contract
That is unlikely to happen with insurance.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
41/75
Insurance Policies are Interpreted by
the Court An insurance policy is to be interpreted by the
court as a matter of law. Smith v. Prudential
Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 340 Ark. 335, 10
S.W.3d 846(2000) overrulingFarm Bureau
Mut. Ins. Co. v. Whitten, 51 Ark. App. 124,
126-27, 911 S.W.2d 270, 271 (1995).
Whitten created some confusion because itsuggested that sometimes the interpretation of an
insurance contract could be left up to a jury
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
42/75
Distinguish ERISA
Employee benefit plans governed by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 are not governed by insurance law, but
by ERISA. All these rules of construction go
out the window.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
43/75
Parties to an Insurance Policy
Insurance Company
Insured
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
44/75
Others involved
Claimant/Plaintiff (Third Party)
Insurance Agent or Broker
Lawyers
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
45/75
Structure of an Insurance Policy
DECLARATIONS PAGE
Usually stapled to the front
Blanks filled in for
Name of insured
Policy number
Limits of coverage
Policy period
Lists of which documents constitute the policy
Coverage provided
Name of agent
Logo and catchy slogan
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
46/75
Structure of an Insurance Policy
Contract (Usually Preprinted)
Insuring Agreement
Definitions
Grant of Coverage
Exclusions
Conditions
Conditions precedent
Conditions Subsequent Covenants
Endorsements
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
47/75
Structure of an Insurance Policy
Standardized Forms
The insuring agreements are almost alwaysstandardized forms.
The Insurance Services Office writes a lot ofthem, but there are other trade associations as well
Mutual Insurance Rating Bureau
Insurance Rating Bureau
National Bureau of Casualty Underwriters Confederated Gobbledygook and Boilerplate
Conglomerate
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
48/75
Significance
The Insured has the burden of proof on coverage
The Insurer has the burden of proof on exclusions
With a condition precedent, the insurer need not
prove prejudice. All the insurer must show is that
the condition precedent was not met.Fireman's
Fund Ins. Co. v. Care Mgmt., 2010 Ark. 110.
Decided after the written materials were written. March 4,
2010. See the footnote on p. 17. I guessed wrong. TheEighth Circuit guessed right. All I guessed wrong on was
the insurers strategy, though.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
49/75
Typical exclusions
Intentional Act
Exclusions There are certain instances which we do not
intend to cover for liability. Under this policy, liability to
others and medical expenses do not apply to personalinjury or property damage:
1. Which is expected or intended by an insured.
CNA Ins. Co. v. McGinnis, 10 Ark. App. 234, 663 S.W.2d 182
(1994) rev'd CNA Ins. Co. v. McGinnis, 282 Ark. 90, 666 S.W.2d
689 (1984).
The test is whether a plain ordinary person would expect
and intend damage to result from the actions involved.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
50/75
Typical Conditions
Notice
Inventory
Cooperation
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
51/75
Typical Endorsements
Additional coverage
Commercial policy, computer equipment, etc.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
52/75
Significance
I dont think the Arkansas Courts have given
extraordinary weight to the simple location in
a policy of a particular provision.
Courts in other states have rejected the idea
that you can assign burdens of proof
reflexively just based on where in a policy a
particular provision is found. Appleman 3.07-[1].
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
53/75
Lines of Insurance
Homeowners
Casualty/Indemnity
Automobile Commercial
Life
Disability
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
54/75
FIRST PARTY COVERAGE
Identifying the insured
Declarations page
Definitions page
Insuring agreement
IV. DEFINITION OF INSURED
The unqualified word "INSURED" includes the named insured
and if the named insured is an individual, his spouse anddependent children residing in the household and also includes: *
* * *
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
55/75
Insured
. . . "insured" means a person or organization
described under "Persons Insured"; . . .
Persons Insured: The following are insureds under
Part 1: * * * (2) any other person using such
automobile with the permission of the named
insured, provided his actual operation or (if he is not
operating) his other actual use thereof is within thescope of such permission, and . . . .
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
56/75
Insured
In business policies, an insured may be
defined as including, "your employees, other
than your executive directors, but only for
acts within the course and scope of their
employment by you.
Tri-State Ins. Co. v. Sing, 41 Ark. App. 142, 850
S.W.2d 6 (1993).
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
57/75
Acts of an insured
An insurance policy which contains an
exclusion for acts of "an insured" can refuse
to pay an innocent insured if the acts of a
guilty "insured" void the policy.
Noland v. Farmers Insurance Company, 319 Ark.
449, 892 S.W.2d 271 (1995).
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
58/75
Separation of Insureds provision
Except with respect to the limits of insurance,
and any rights or duties specifically assigned
in this coverage part to the first Named
Insured, this insurance applies:
(a) As if each named Insured were the only named
Insured: and
(b) Separately to each Insured against whomclaim is made or suit is brought.
Silverball Amusement, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire
Insurance Co., 842 F.Supp. 1151 (W.D.Ark. 1994).
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
59/75
Cause of Loss
Definition of occurrence in policy.
"an accident, including continuous or repeated
exposure to substantially the same general and
harmful conditions, which results in bodily
injury or property damage neither expected
nor intended from the standpoint of the
insured."
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
60/75
Definition of Damage
Property damage in the policy is defined as:
(1) Physical injury to or destruction of tangible
property which occurs during the policy period,
including the loss of use thereof at any time resultingtherefrom, or
(2) Loss of use of tangible property which has not
been physically injured or destroyed provided such
loss of use is caused by an occurrence during thepolicy period.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
61/75
First Party Coverage
Protects insureds or their heirs from losses
Health Insurance
Disability Insurance
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
62/75
Third Party Coverage
Liability Coverage
Automobile
Workers Compensation Property Insurance
Homeowners
Commercial
Professional Liability
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
63/75
Policies that provide both
As a practical matter, in most circumstances,
if an entity needs first party coverage, he, she,
or it needs third party coverage too.
Many policies have provisions that provide
both First Party and Third Party coverage
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
64/75
Homeowners Policies
First Party coverage on dwelling
Property damagephysical injury to, destruction of,or loss of use of tangible property. Fire, storm, etc.
Exclusions Earth movement
Collapse
Mold
War, nuclear hazard Flood
Business
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
65/75
Exclusion: Criminal Acts
We do not cover any bodily injury or property damage intended by, orwhich may reasonably be expected to result from the intentional orcriminal acts or omissions of, any insured person. This exclusion applieseven if:
(a) such insured person lacks the mental capacity to govern his or herconduct;
* * * * * *
(c) such bodily injury or property damage is sustained by a differentperson than intended or reasonably expected; . . .
This exclusion applies regardless of whether or not such insured person isactually charged with, or convicted of, a crime.
Allstate Insurance Company v. Burroughs, 914 F. Supp. 308 (W.D. Ark.,1996)
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
66/75
Exclusion: Business Pursuits
Business pursuits
This exclusion provides that the liability coveragedoes not apply "to bodily injury or property
damage arising out of business pursuits exceptactivities therein which are ordinarily incident tonon-business pursuits." U.S.Fire Insurance Co. v.Reynolds, 11 Ark. App. 141, 667 S.W.2d 664(1984).
As you can see, there is an exclusion, and anexception to the exclusion.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
67/75
Commercial General Policies
Insured: Business, officers, directors, owners,
Perils: fire, lightning, explosions, theft, smoke
Exclusions, riot, volcanoes, collapse, etc.
Coverage for Bodily Injury claims
Personal Injury Term of art, intangible injuries
including false arrest, false detention, false
imprisonment, etc.
Advertising injury.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
68/75
Exclusion: Automobile
Typical exclusion
Automobile:
This policy does not apply to bodily injury or property
damage arising out of the ownership, maintenanceoperation, use, loading or unloading of any motorvehicle owned or operated by, or rented or loaned toany insured; but this provision does not apply to bodilyinjury or property damage occurring on the residentpremises if the motor vehicle is not subject to motorvehicle registration because it is used exclusively onthe residence premises or kept in dead storage on theresidence premises.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
69/75
Pollution exclusions
It is agreed that the exclusion relating to the actual, alleged orthreatened discharge, dispersal, release or escape of pollutantsis replaced by the following: (1) Bodily injury or property damage arising out of the actual, alleged
or threatened discharge, dispersal, release or escape of pollutants.
(2) Any loss, cost or expense arising out of any governmentaldirection or request that the named insured test for, monitor, clean up,remove contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize pollutants.
Subparagraph (1) above does not apply to bodily injury or propertydamage caused by heat, smoke or fumes from a hostile fire. As used inthis exclusion, a hostile fire means one which becomes uncontrollable,or breaks out from where it was intended to be.
Pollutants means any solid, liquid, gaseous thermal irritant orcontaminant, including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis,chemicals and waste.
Waste includes materials to be recycled, reconditioned or reclaimed.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
70/75
Exclusion: GroomingThis insurance does not apply to bodily injury, property damage,
personal injury or advertising injury
arising out of:
1. The rendering of or failure to render any service, treatment, advice orinstruction related to: a. Any hair removal by electrolysis or any surgical procedure to remove or
replace hair;
b. Any application of permanent cosmetic makeup, tattoos or otherimplantation of pigments into skin pores;
c. Any invasive medical or surgical procedure to improve or alter theappearance of skin, including but not limited to injections, chemical peels,dermabrasion, laser surgery or cryosurgery;
d. Body piercing, other than piercing of ears;
e. Diet or physical fitness; however, this exclusion does not apply to theuse of physical fitness facilities if the user is not under the directsupervision of a personal trainer;
f. Chiropody; or
g. Tanning the skin; or
(From a hotel policy)From my legal malpractice policy.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
71/75
Directors and Officers
Side A coverage covers losses directlyincurred by the directors and officers whichthe corporation is not required or allowed to
pay. Side B reimburses the corporation for losses
incurred by the directors and officers that thecorporation is allowed to pay.
Side C arose when corporations noticed thatthere was no coverage for their own out of
pocket losses, which could be substantial.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
72/75
Errors and Omissions
Professional liability insurance for:
Doctors
Architects Engineers
Surveyors, accountants, lawyers, agents,
brokers, bankers, and the like
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
73/75
Occurrence versus Claims Made
An occurrence policy covers the insured for
any occurrence that happens while the policy
is in force
A claims made policy covers the insured for
any claim made while the policy is in force.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
74/75
Construction Defect
D. Construction Defect(s) means any actual or allegeddefective, faulty, or delayed construction or any other matterconstituting a construction defect under applicable law,regardless of whether it results from:
(1)defective or incorrect architectural plans or other designs,
(2)defective or improper soil testing,
(3)defective, inadequate or insufficient protection fromsubsoil or earth movement or subsidence,
(4)construction, manufacture or assembly of any tangibleproperty,
(5)the failure to provide or pay for any construction-relatedgoods or services, or
(6)the supervision or management of any construction-relatedactivities.
-
8/9/2019 Insurance Coverage Litigation.i
75/75
Back to Bananaberry analysis
Is there a homeowners claim here?
Is he engaged in business or is he just cleaningout his house?
Is there a criminal acts exclusion? If neither exclusion is good, why should the
plaintiff bother suing the insurance company?
Bananaberrys got money. Let him collect from
his insurer.
Penalty and attorneys fees.