integrating resilience and adaptation in eia.pptx [read-only]...02/03/2017 mott macdonald |...
TRANSCRIPT
Phil Le Gouais – Mott MacDonald
IAIA Water Symposium 2nd September 2016
Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
The guide provides a framework for the effective consideration of climate resilience and adaptation in the EIA process
02/03/2017 2Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
Within 20 years we estimate US$200bn of investment each year will be needed globally to combat losses from climate changeGSI and Mott MacDonald CRI
02/03/2017 3Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
Amended EIA Directive
02/03/2017 Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA 4
Increased Reference to “Climate”
Article 3(1): References Land, Soil, Air Water and
Climate
Annex III (screening) – Risk of affect of accident/disaster
(incl Climate)
Annex IV –Reference to both
GHG and Adaptation for inclusion in the
EIA
2014/52/EU
Seven Step Guide to considering Adaptation and Resilience
02/03/2017 Mott MacDonald | Presentation title 5
Key PrinciplesResourcing the EIA to Assess Climate Effects
02/03/2017 6Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
Someone needs to know what they are
talking about!
Familiarity with the datasets and policy
context
Facilitates discussion on emissions
scenarios
Communicates scenarios to wider project/EIA team
Key PrinciplesIdentifying the Future Climate
02/03/2017 7Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
Establishes the Climate Baseline using CURRENT data (e.g. continued validity of UKCP09)
Define a single and accepted projection/emission scenario to use across all disciplines
Interpret these into other baselines
What timeframes are relevant to the project?
Team needs to be clear on assumptions made.
Key PrinciplesBuilding Climate Resilience
02/03/2017 8Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
CCRA•Need to determine vulnerability – usually through a risk based assessment
Planning•Consideration at every stage of the design process – not only in EIA of final option
Buy in
•Need to agree with stakeholders what their concerns are (primarily through scoping)•Need to agree with the proponent what the risk appetite/tolerance is•Reconciling the two may be a challenge
Scales
•Need to consider both chronic issues over the long term (could impact viability or business case)
•Need to consider resilience to extreme events
Agree
•Dialogue with design team is vital to agree issues, understand where genuine resilience issues are and agree how to deal with it
Key PrinciplesIntegrating Adaptation into the ES
02/03/2017 9Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
Emphasis is placed on meaningful consideration of climate risks at scoping stage to ensure appropriate consideration in technical chapters
No explicit recommendation on separate chapter vs integration into existing chapters vs combination of both
Assessments must be proportionate to the risks
Data sources and assumptions must be transparent
Key PrinciplesDeveloping Mitigation and Adaptive Management
02/03/2017 10Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
Plugging the gap between Resilience and Risk
Presents a view of the mitigation hierarchy related to CC
Are there opportunities for the project to create broader resilience (e.g. community)?
Need to consider Adaptive Management approaches
• Longer term risks• Risks with high uncertainty• Where mitigation is not appropriate/cost effective at this time
Residual Challenges
02/03/2017 11Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
•What is significant and what is under-rated?•Legal robustness vs filter of main issues
Proportionality
•Complex, risk based concepts which are difficult to communicate•Outputs of climate analysis not often “useful” or in context of technical assessments
Communication
•CCRA in EIA not done by the designer•Does dealing with CC in EIA isolate it from other uncertainties – demand, energy prices, other baseline prediction uncertainty or design assumptions)?
•How does it fit with SEA?
Integrated Design
•How do you monitor compliance with “adaptive management” over the life of an asset?
Monitoring
Acknowledgements
02/03/2017 12
Co-editors/authors
James Montgomery (Mott MacDonald)Phil Le Gouais (Mott MacDonald)Henry Le Brecht (Mott MacDonald)Josh Fothergill (IEMA)
Inputs and comments
Kay Johnstone (Climate Ready – Env Agency)Alison Walker and Arefa Siddiqi (HS2)Nick Blyth and Ed Barlow (IEMA)Bryony Cunningham (Jacobs)Amy Robinsom (RPS)James Blake (RSK) Richard Halsey (Turley Associates)Jeonghwa Yi (formerly University of Cambridge)Mark Roberts (formerly Wardell Armstrong), andStephen Brindle (Waterman)
Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA
02/03/2017 Mott MacDonald | Integrating Resilience and Adaptation in EIA 13