integrating vehicle, driver and infrastructure...

Integrating vehicle, driver and

infrastructure strategies

Al Bustan Rotana Hotel, Al Rashidya Ballroom A & B

PLENARY SESSION ONE

Plenary Session One

Presentation 1

DEVELOPMENT OF AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY

AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS AS A CHALLENGE FOR

PTI

Managing Director, DEKRA Automobil GmbH, Germany

Gerd Neumann

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

3

Vision Zero – Requirement and challenge

Factors of success:

Development of automotive

engineering

Improvement of infrastructure

Improvement of medical rescue

services

…..

PTI-Contribution:

Support high standard of vehicle safety during „lifetime“ !

Vision Zero

219.032

229.538

233.850236.040

239.328

242.492244.879

205000

210000

215000

220000

225000

230000

235000

240000

245000

250000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

20.000

25.000

30.000

35.000

40.000

45.000

50.000

Bestand an Personenkraftwagen EU25/27

in 1.000

Verkehrstote in EUTraffic deaths in EUAsset of passenger cars EU25/27 in 1,000

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

4

Challenge – Modern vehicle technology

Further development issues: new propulsion system, online diagnosis, telemetry systems, networking of transport mode, Change of vehicles:

entertainment systems on wheels, new mobility concepts, …

20132000 2016 2020 > 2025

Driver assistance system

simple situation

Driver assistance system

complex situation

partly

automated

completely

automated

JumpSte

ps

of

Deve

lopm

ent

highly

automated

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

5

Challenge: Development of Vehicle Safety

Innovation for Vehicle Safety is going to be more quickly marketable

through new electronic systems and IT solutions

Active Safety

PRE-SAFE ®

Crash PreparationPassive Safety

Accident possible Accident is there Crash

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

6

Example Active Safety

Step by step reduction of accident potential and higher influence

of technical safety on the general road safety

Strategy of Avoidance

- Reduce energy

- Turnout

- Remain

- Braking

- Steering

- Not driving back

or sideways

- Emergency Brake Assist.

- Lane Assist.

- Pedestrian recognition

Lane Change Assist.

- Escape - Acceleration - Autonomous systems

Vehicle Action DAS –

Driver Assistance System

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

7

Example: Pre-Safe® and Passive Safety

Source: Daimler AG

knee bag

for the driver

Seat cushion airbag

(executive reclining seat)

-seat belt tensioner

and self adaptive seat belt force

limiter for driver and front passenger

for driver and front passenger

side bags

front

Side bags

fond

BELTBAG

outer fond passengers

seat belt tensioners and

self adaptive seat belt force limiter

on the outer seats of the fond

active belt buckle

outer fond passengerswindow bags

about two seat rowsdriver-airbag

front passenger airbag

with adaptive control

The variety of technical solutions requires new comprehensive PTI test procedures

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

8

Challenge: Telematics

Challenge with highest priority !

International regulations are under

amendment

EU-Example: eCall –

automated emergency call

Obligatory for homologation from 2018

First step testing for PTI implementation

Technology development gives new questions

for the future of PTI - Role of CITA members ?

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

4,5 5,5 6,5 7,5 8,5 9,5 10,5 11,5

9

What is the impact of vehicle innovation on PTI ?

Quo vadis PTI … ?

1980 1990 2010 2018

Inn

ova

tio

n r

ate

–ve

hic

le m

an

ufa

ctu

rin

g

Content of PTI

D increase

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

10

What has to be done ?

Innovation in PTI Technology

PTI ability as homologation standard

continuous amendment of the relevant regulations

…

Which role could CITA play as a global network ?

global

regulations

national

EU

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

11

Important step has been done !

The formulation of joint strategic goals is necessary !

CITA has taken over

an important role in Geneva !

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

12

The way to a realizable strategy ?

Example guidelines Targets Tasks

Picture of the future

MissionVision

From the CITA Vision & Mission to joint targets and measurements

innovation

focus on members

globalisation

integration

support of national government

Joint acting as a success factor :

From the strategy to the implementation…. !

Dr.

Gerd

Neum

ann

-D

EK

RA

Auto

mobil

Gm

bH

13

Thank you !

Plenary Session One

Presentation 2

AUTOMATED/AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES – THE

CHALLENGE FOR TYPE APPROVAL AND VEHICLE

INSPECTION

Chief of Vehicle Regulations and Transport Innovations Section,

Transport Division, UN/ECE, Geneva

Walter Nissler

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

Transport Division

2015 CITA CONFERENCE

Dubai

Automated/autonomous vehicles

The challenge for type-approval and periodic

technical inspections of vehicles

UNECE – Transport Division

Slide 16

Content

I. Automated/autonomous vehicles

II. WP.29

a) WP.29 Activities

b) WP.29 scope and organization

III. The tools of WP.29

a) Vehicle approval/certification: the 1958 and 1998

Agreements

b) Periodic technical inspections(PTI): the 1997 Agreement


Slide 17

Content


II. WP.29

a) WP.29 Activities




Agreements



Slide 18

Vehicle approval/certification regulation challenges Other challenges

• Adapt existing vehicle construction regulations

(WP.29)

• Update existing Regulations

• Define proper HMI concepts

• Identify side effects and address them

• Design new safety concepts

• Address interoperability issues

• Integrate new technologies & standardization work

(e.g. from ITU, ISO, IEC, IEEE)

• Not only hardware but also software to be covered

(modeling of decision making processes at conflict

situations)

• Don’t neglect traditional vehicle safety issues

• Adapt traffic rules? (e.g. safety distances?)

• Adapt infrastructure?

• Address security questions

• Revise responsibility / product liability concepts

• Define expectations of the product / its

Manufacturer

• Implement customer protection updates

• Adapt the role of the insurance companies and

Define balanced relationship between

«driver (owner)» / «Manufacturer» /

«insurance»


Slide 19

PTI challenges Other challenges

• Adapt existing vehicle inspection rules (WP.29)

• ECSS Study as a first approach

• How to include image based systems

• How to inspect radar/distance sensors

• How to inspect positioning systems

• ???

• Integrate new technologies in PTI

• Not only hardware but also software to be covered

(checking of software versions and installation of

mandatory updates)

• Don’t neglect traditional vehicle safety issues

• How to inspect V2V, V2I or V2X communication?

• Can / may we use information generated during the

use of the vehicles for PTI?

• Address data security questions during PTI


Slide 20

Crucial need to

update regulations

constantly to

cover new

technologies and

to harmonize

internationally the

technical

requirements


Slide 21

Content


II. WP.29

a) WP.29 Activities




Agreements



Slide 22

The World Forum for Harmonization of

Vehicle Regulations (WP.29) • UNECE Transport Division: secretariat to WP.29 for more than 60 years

• WP.29 is:

• the unique worldwide regulatory forum for the automotive sector

• administrating three Multilateral UN Agreements

Construction regulations

1958 Agreement – Type Approval Regulations with

mutual recognition of the type approvals

1998 Agreement – Global Technical Regulations

In Use PTI regulations

1997 Agreement – Adoption of Uniform Conditions for

Periodical Technical Inspections of Wheeled Vehicles

and the Reciprocal Recognition of Such Inspection


Slide 23

What is WP.29 doing?

Passive safetyEmissions of pollutants and CO2

Noise Active safety Lighting and light signalling

General safety


Slide 24

The WP.29 structure

General SafetyPassive SafetyActive Safety

GRSP

Pedestrian protection,Head restraints,Child restraint,Truck cab strength

GRSG

Safety of wheelchair users in buses & coaches,Glazing materials,Rear view mirrors

GRPE & GRB

Pollution and Energy

Noise

GRE & GRRF

Lighting and light-signalling

Brakes and running gear

World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)

Environmental protection

Around 40 non-permanent technical groups

Committee for the 1958 Agreement (AC.1)Committee for the 1998 Agreement (AC.3)Committee for the 1997 Agreement (AC.4)

Committee for Coordination of Work (AC.2)


Slide 25

• Agreements open to all Nations of the UN

• Participation open to States, Governmental Organizations (GOs) and

NGOs, but

Decisions are taken by Governments (of CPs)

• No other worldwide organization covers this area

WP.29 is worldwide, unique and transparent


Slide 26

Geographical scope of WP.29


Slide 27

Content


II. WP.29

a) WP.29 Activities


III.The tools of WP.29

a) Short introduction about the 1958 and 1998

Agreements

b) Focus on the 1997 Agreement (PTI)


Slide 28

Principal Elements of the 1958 Agreement

The 1958 Agreement provides:

Eligible Contracting Parties to the 1958 Agreement:

Members of UN

Legal framework for the adoption of uniform UN

Regulations on the vehicle construction

Reciprocal recognition of Type Approval

Approved once and accepted everywhere (CPs)


Slide 29




Members of UN

Legal framework for the adoption of uniform

GTRs, to be transposed nationally

No administrative provisions

(for self certification and homologation)


Slide 30




Members of UN

Legal framework for the adoption of uniform

UN Rules for PTI of vehicles in use

Reciprocal recognition of certificates of such

inspections for cross-border use of vehicles


Slide 31

For environmental issues

For safety inspection


Slide 32

Current PTI regulations (UN Rules)

Commercial vehicles – Vehicles of Category N2 and N3

Coach and busses – Vehicles of Category M2 and M3

(Mass > 3.5t)

Next steps - Amendments in discussions

Scope extension – Including vehicles below 3.5t

i.e. passenger cars and vans

Update of technical provisions – e.g. for cars

Future

Extend content – Include elements relevant for level of PTI (test-equipment, skills & training of inspectors, supervision)

Make it a set of harmonized technical provisions - for vehicles in use derived from those of the 1958 & 1998

Agreements

WP.29 has agreed to update the UN Rules

Status of the 1997 Agreement


Slide 33

Latest developments at WP.29

• New Informal Working Group on PTI

• Established at 165th session March 2015

• Chair: The Netherlands

• Secretariat: CITA

• Main tasks: Establish new Rules on

• Test equipment

• Skills, training and certification of inspectors

• Supervision of test centres


Slide 34

Possible new structure

for WP.29

General SafetyPassive SafetyActive Safety

GRSP

Pedestrian protection,Head restraints,Child restraint,Truck cab strength

GRSG

Safety of wheelchair users in buses & coaches,Glazing materials,Rear view mirrors

GRPE & GRB

Pollution and Energy

Noise

GRE & GRRF

Lighting and light-signalling

Brakes and running gear

World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29)

Environmental protection

Committee for the 1958 Agreement (AC.1)Committee for the 1998 Agreement (AC.3)Committee for the 1997 Agreement (AC.4)

Committee for Coordination of Work (AC.2)

….

Test items, methods, defect assessment

Equipment

Training

Supervision

Vehicle inspection

Around 40 non-permanent technical groups


Slide 35

Contracting Parties to the 1997 Agreement

Signatories, pending ratification: Austria; Belgium; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Denmark; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Ireland; Italy; Portugal; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; United Kingdom


Slide 36

THANK YOUFOR YOUR ATTENTION

World Forum WP.29

http://www.unece.org/trans/main/welcwp29.html

http://www.unece.org/trans/main/welcwp29.html


Slide 37

Plenary Session One

Presentation 3

VEHICLES AND DRIVERS OF THE FUTURE:

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IS NEEDED

President, CIECA, Europe

Kari Hakuli

“Vehicles and drivers of the future:international cooperation is needed”

Dubai, UAE, 14-16 April 2015|

Mr. Kari Hakuli, CIECA President

– International commission for driver testing

– Non governmental platform organization working to:

• develop technical and scientific knowledge about driver education and

assessment.

• develop shared solutions to the safe use of motor vehicles

• share a common understanding

– Founded in 1956

– 69 members in 35 countries

– Core members design and deliver theoretical and practical

driving tests

– Managed by a Board elected by a General Assembly

– Secretariat and offices in Brussels, Belgium

– Financed by annual membership fee

– United Nations consultative status and observer status in

driving licence commitee of EU Commission

CIECA

Our objectives

• Improve road safety

• Improve driving standards

• Contribute to development of road

traffic education

• Protect the environment

• Facilitate mobility

footer

Why did we renew our strategy in 2011?

• We need to meet the challenges of today to make roads safer– Environmental awareness

– Ageing and mobility

– New vehicle technology and intelligent transport systems

– Financial uncertainty

• Issues in a complex system need broader processing

• We are just a part of the system

What did we change?

• We took a broader role in road safety and driving standards

• We changed our statutes to match the new strategy

• We accepted wider range of memberships

• We started to develop partnerships with other relevant organizations in the sector

• We started to build work programs based on the strategy

What happened?

• We have got many new members (29)

• We have more cooperation with other stakeholders

• We are learning new things

• We have established a broader role in the field

• We are more global

• We have more stable financial position

Building more bridges

• A system approach to new vehicle technology

Mercedes-Benz-F-015 concept vehicle

Hype is there already

Autonomous Vehicles

Hype cycle 2015, Gartner inc.

Why cooperation is needed?

• Not just vehicle technical issue, also human factors (safety, usability, acceptability) and infrastructure as well as legal and institutional issues must be envisaged

• Road traffic system is complex and the interactions between the components (vehicle, driver, infrastructure) must be taken into consideration to create a safe system

Who should cooperate?

• Regulators– UNECE: WP1, WP29

– EU: DGMOVE, ENT, ENER, ENV

• Vehicle manufacturing industry

• Vehicle testing and inspection industry

• Road infrastructure developers

• Driver training and testing industry

• Research institutes

• Authorities (licenses and surveillance)

Drivers of the future

• Are there any drivers?

– From driver assisting systems into autonomous vehicles

• Drivers task is changing from manual control to supervision

• Driver education and testing have to adapt

• Vehicles have to adapt to human factors

• Legislation has to adapt more quickly

Conclusions

• It is strategically wise to broaden the horizon, look out of the box and to cooperate

• Rapid development of vehicle technology has fundamental implications for many organizations

• A system approach and cooperation is needed

• CIECA is willing to cooperate and contribute

• Together we are stronger!

Question 1:

What impact will this vehicle innovation have

on roadworthiness inspection?

Answer Choices:

A. Very High

B. High

C. Moderate

D. Quite Low

Question 2:

How important is it that type approval

standards are designed to facilitate in-service

roadworthiness inspection?

Answer Choices:

A. Extremely High

B. High

C. Moderately Important

D. Low Importance

E. Not Important at all

Question 3:

In the future, how important will it be to

coordinate these factors for new initiatives for safe

and sustainable mobility?

Answer Choices:

A. Very Highly Important

B. High Importance

C. Moderately Important

D. Low Importance

E. Not Important At All

Question 4:

How difficult will it be to find appropriate

solutions?

Answer Choices:

A. Very Difficult

B. Moderately Difficult

C. Quite Easy

D. Very Easy

Question 5:

Should roadworthiness standards be tailored to

meet these different needs?

Answer Choices:

A. Standards should be the same worldwide

B. Each region should have different standards

C. Each country should have different standards

D. This is not an important issue

Question 6:

Do you consider that drivers are ready for this

change of role?

Answer Choices:

A. Understand the implications and keen for the changed role

B. Do not understand the implications but still keen for the change

C. Neutral about the changed role

D. Are becoming aware of the implications of this change

E. Not aware if the implications for this change

12:00 – 13:30

PLEASE RETURN PROMPTLY TO YOUR

SEATS FOR PLENARY SESSION TWO

LUNCH

integrating vehicle, driver and infrastructure...

Documents