integration of high resolution satellite data, dem and gis ... · digital interpretation of ......
TRANSCRIPT
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMATICS AND GEOSCIENCES
Volume 5, No 2, 2014
© Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.0
Research article ISSN 0976 – 4380
Submitted on August 2014 published on November 2014 345
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale
mapping – A case study from lower Gangetic alluvial plain of India Tapati banerjee1, Singh S.K.1, Dharumarajan S1, Dipak sarkar2
1N.B.S.S & L.U.P (ICAR), Block – DK, Sector-II, Salt Lake-Kolkata-700 091, West Bengal,
India
2N.B.S.S & L.U.P (ICAR), Amaravati Road, Nagpur-440 010, Maharashtra,
ABSTRACT
The present paper deals with the technique of large scale mapping using satellite data of 5.8m
resolution accompanied by DEM in GIS environment essential for farm level planning and
development. The study area is located in the lower gangetic alluvial plain of India where
elevation ranges from 5 to 14 meter above Mean Sea Level (MSL). Digital interpretation of
IRS P6 LISS IV satellite image in conjunction with Survey of India topographical maps and
ASTERGDEM of 30meter resolution and subsequent ground data helped to prepare PPU
(Physiographic cum photomorphic unit) map which were further correlated with elevation
and NDVI values. Soils occurring in different PPU were examined and PPU-soil relationship
was developed. The technique of mapping thus can be extended through faster as well as
precision mapping at farm level with plot wise information for site-specific management on
cost-effective basis.
Keywords: Large scale mapping, remote sensing, lower gangetic alluvial plain,
Physiographic cum photomorphic unit, PPU-soil relationship
1. Introduction
Over the past few decades planners and researchers are highly concerned with precision
farming and crop management that requires detail inventory and characterization of the farm
or group of farms in order to make realistic, economically viable and environmentally sound
crop production decision. For this purpose large scale mapping (1:25,000 or more) and
database is the prerequisite as because small and medium scale (1:1M to 1:50,000) data pose
problems sometimes not proper due to their coarse resolution. Depending upon the area
concerned, either physiographic mapping and/or soil mapping or both are taken into
consideration based on catena or toposequence concept. In most cases, landform
classification by photo interpretation is considered as the primary step to prepare soil map
since landform delineations are mostly associated directly with natural soil bodies (Buringh
1960). In recent trend, there has been the interest in replacing or supplementing the expert
judgment of the surveyor by the use of digital terrain analysis… (Moore et al 1993; Gessler
et al 1995; Bell et al 2000). Rapid development of remote sensing and GIS provide new
approaches to meet the demand related modeling (Mermut and Egwarnan 2001; Saheli et al.
2003) which allow to express the relationship explicitly and mathematically for rapid
production of output relevant to meet the environment and socio-economic demand. Irvin et
al. (1997) were among the first to use terrain parameters to derive soil landscape elements
and provide more objective basis for production of soil maps. They compared automated
classification of landform with that of the manual delineations by Aerial Photo Interpretation
(API) using a small study area. The surface features associated with different land use/land
cover reflected on satellite image provide good information to delineate boundaries
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 346
accurately through systematic interpretation. This reduces time and traversing for validating
soil boundaries. The present study deals with the technique for large scale mapping using
high resolution satellite data in continuation of the previous work done for the same area
mapped at 1:250,000 (Soil Survey Staff 1992) and 1:50,000 scale (Sarkar et al.2001).
2. Study area
The study area is Polba-Dadpur and Chinsurah-Mogra block of Hugli district in Lower
Gangetic Alluvial plain of India (Figure 1) covering nearly 18,000 ha area. The mean
elevation varies nearly 5 to 14 meter above mean sea level (MSL) and local relief varies from
nearly level plain (0-1% slope) to very gently sloping plain (< 2% slope) developed on the
alluvium borne by Hugli river in the east and Damodar river in the west. The area is
characterized by sub-humid tropical climate with ‘Hyperthermic’ temperature regime; Ustic
soil moisture regime. Paddy is the principal crop followed by vegetables especially potato
and other mixed vegetables, wheat and mustard in rabi season including summer vegetables
with sporadic distribution of plantations like mango, banana etc.
Figure 1: Location map of the study area
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 347
3. Methodology
3.1 Data and Datasets
Map overlay techniques coupled with statistical analysis to describe the quantitative
relationship between landscape components: landform-land use-soil have been worked out as
follows
1. Interpretation of topographical maps and digital elevation model for relief
identification
2. Digital image interpretation for land use and land cover study
3. Ground truth verification and soil sampling
4. Automated data management and analysis in GIS
5. Soil laboratory analysis
6. Farm level soil mapping
Elevation and slope database prepared for the study area combining with ASTERGDEM of
30 meter resolution and topographical maps of 1:50,000 scales having numbers 79A/4, 79A/8,
79B/1 and 79B/5 prepared by Survey of India. Digital interpretation of IRS-P6 LISS IV
satellite image was interpreted using NDVI [(NIR - RED) / (NIR + RED)] techniques for
land use and land cover study. The flow chart for the methodology of large scale mapping is
shown in figureure 2.
Figure 2: Flow chart showing methodology of soil mapping
3.2. Physiographic mapping
A series of maps at 1:250,000 and 1:50,000 scales had been consulted for the study area. As
the study area is small with single morpholithological character i.e. alluvium; morphometry
viz. relief amplitude and slope derived from DEM is considered as basic discriminating
criteria for mapping. The area represents a vast monotonous plain with a relief difference of 0
to 2% as such it poses problems to identify landforms observed in surface form. Therefore
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 348
DEM was used as an additional variable with satellite image as the vegetation/ crop
cultivation is largely governed by altitude which ultimately helps to divide the area into
discrete segments. Following this idea, relationship was established between altitude and land
use after transferring raster properties (DEM) into vector attributes (Land use) in GIS
environment using TNT mips Pro. Finally a detailed PPU (Physiographic-cum-photomorphic
unit) map layer generated and legend was given in continuation of the previous physiographic
legend which was further correlated with NDVI values. In this PPU map first, second and
third letter represents parent material/physiography, fourth letter presents slope, fifth and
sixth letter with subscript of seventh letter (if any) represents landform and lastly eighth
and/or ninth letter with subscript (if any) represents land use with image characteristics
(Figure 3).
Figure 3: Explanation of (a) Physiography cum photomorphic unit and (b) Soil mapping
legend
3.3 Ground truth verification and soil sampling
Ground truth was done to verify the PPU in the field and depending upon the variation of
PPU soil sampling sites were selected. Detailed soil profile study was carried out as per the
norms laid down in the soil survey manual (Soil Survey Staff 1993). Soil samples with auger
boring were done for specific PPU, soils were correlated and series were identified with
phases. Horizon wise soil samples were collected from the representative sites for physical
and chemical analysis as per standard methodology. At each site the variation in
morphological and site characteristics of soils were studied and recorded. The soil samples of
representative soil profile were collected for further studies in the laboratory. Finally soils
were classified according to latest Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff 2003).
3.4 Soil mapping legend
Delineation of soil boundaries was made by observing soil characteristics by auger boring
observation. Soil distributions were mapped at 25,000 scale showing soil series association
and their phases. As the study area represents monotonous flat terrain with negligible relief
difference in slope, erosion and stoniness the phases were identified mainly by surface
texture. Therefore soil legend depicts the name of series (first one to two letters) followed by
surface texture (one to four letters) for phase identification (Figure 3).
4. Results and discussion
As per the physiographic mapping of 1:250,000 scale prepared by NBSS & LUP, the study
area comes under Bengal basin mainly alluvium and have a great impact on geomorphic units
that have occurred under different formation. Two major slope categories were identified i.e.
nearly level plain (0-1%) occupying an area of 1,921.7 ha (50.8% of total study area), very
gently sloping plain (1-2%) cover an area of 11,568.8 ha (41.9% of total study area). Rest of
the area near Hugli river bank comprises of gently sloping (2-3%) area covering nearly
4509.5 ha (7.3% of total study area). The bank of river Hugli (2 to 4 km wide) stands out on
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 349
levee (12 to 14 meter above MSL) which is stable in nature. This levee can be subdivided
into subunits viz. 1) upper levee and 2) lower levee. The upper levee is densely populated and
occupies an area of 4,950 ha. The lower levee which is the back slope of upper levee formed
terraced land with altitudinal range of 10 to 12 meter occupied by plantation. Rest of the area
is level plain which was further subdivided into three categories viz. concave, convex and
straight slope.
4.1 PPU mapping
Different land use/land cover categories were identified in the study area and correlated with
altitude by transferring raster properties (DEM) into vector (Land use). From the relationship
between altitude and land use (Figure-4) it has been observed that major habitation is found
within the altitude of 13 to 14 meters demarcated as Upper levee although habitation is also
distributed sporadically throughout the block. Plantation is found within 11 to 13 meters
marked as Lower levee.
Figure 4: Relationship between altitude and raster cell under different land use category
Paddy growing area is mainly concentrated within 5 to 6 meters marked as level plain with
concave slope which was further differentiated by their high and low moisture status. Potato
growing area with dark pink tone is found to be concentrated within 5 to 8 meters demarcated
as level plain with convex slope. Transition zone between paddy and potato growing area
comprises mixed vegetable growing area having light pink tone as image characteristics are
concentrated within 5 to 7 meters altitude marked as level plain with straight slope. The
elements of PPU include parent material/ physiography, slope with curvature or local relief,
land use and land cover based on which six units were identified (table 1). These PPU were
correlated with NDVI values of field crops and established a definite relation with
physiographic units when compared (Table 2). Although the study area covers nearly 18,000
ha of Polba-Dadpur and Chinsurah-Mogra block of the Hugli district detailed PPU
(Physiographic cum photomorphic unit) map of two clusters has been shown (Figure 5a).
Puinan cluster is located in the western part and Gotu cluster in the eastern part of the block
each covering four villages.
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 350
Figure 5a and 5b: Physiography-cum-photomorphic unit map and soil map of study area
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 351
Table 1: Description of PPU (Physiographic-cum-Photomorphic Unit)
Table 2: Relationship between NDVI and PPU
NDVI Value Field crops PPU
Minimum Maximum
0.0000000 0.0280000 paddy cultivation having low
moisture
Bab4CeP2
0.0280001 0.0650000 paddy cultivation having high
moisture
Bab4CeP1
0.0650001 0.0970000 mixed type of vegetable cultivation Bab4CxV2
0.0970001 0.1428570 vegetable cultivation dominantly
potato
Bab4CxV1
4.2. PPU-soil relationship
Soil is the result of combined activity and reciprocal influence of parent material, plant and
organisms, climate, age of the land and topography. These were termed as soil formers or
factors of soil formations. The relation may be expressed as S= f (cl, o,r,p,t…) where S
denotes any soil property such as pH, nitrogen, clay; cl, environment climate (rainfall,
temperature); o, flora and fauna as biosphere organisms; r, elevation, slope and depth of
water table as relief; p, parent material; and t, time or age of land (Jenny, 1941). Soils of
alluvial plain are formed under mode of formation. The soils identified in each PPU of
Puinan and Gotu cluster are depicted in figure 5b with description of soil mapping units
(Table 3 and 4) and characteristics of different soil series (Table 5).
Sl
no. PPU Description Tone
1. Bab4Le1H Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very
gently sloping upper levee under habitation
Bluish tone
mixed with
red
2. Bab4Le2Pl Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very
gently sloping lower levee under plantation
Dark reddish
tone
3. Bab4CeP1
Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very
gently concave slope under paddy cultivation
having high moisture
Dark bluish
tone
4. Bab4CeP2
Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very
gently concave slope under paddy cultivation
having low moisture
Light bluish
tone
5. Bab4CxV1
Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very
gently convex slope under vegetable cultivation
dominantly potato
Dark pink
6. Bab4CxV2
Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very
gently convex slope under mixed type of
vegetable cultivation
Light pink
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 352
Table 3: Description of Soil mapping units in Puinan Cluster
Map
unit
Soil
Unit
PPU
Units
Soil
series Description Soil Taxonomy
1 Pu-
sil
Bab4Cx
V1
Puinan
Very deep, well drained,
coarse-loamy soils with silt
loam surface texture on
nearly level convex slope
upland with slight erosion
Fine-silty,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Typic
Haplustepts
2 Pu-l
Bab4Cx
V1
Puinan
Very deep, well drained,
coarse-loamy soils with
loam surface texture on
nearly level convex slope
upland with slight erosion
Fine-silty,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Typic
Haplustepts
3 Ra-
sl
Bab4Cx
V1
Ramnaga
r
Very deep, well drained,
fine-loamy soils with sandy
loam surface texture on
nearly level convex slope
upland with slight erosion
Fine-loamy,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Fluventic
aplustepts
4 Da-
sic
Bab4Ce
P1
Dadpur
Very deep, poorly drained,
fine soils with clay surface
texture on nearly level
concave slope lowland with
very slight erosion
Fine,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Typic
Endoaquepts
5 Da-c
Bab4Ce
P2
Dadpur
Very deep, poorly drained,
fine soils with clay surface
texture on nearly level
concave slope lowland with
very slight erosion
Fine,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Typic
Endoaquepts
6 Da-
sicl
Bab4Ce
P1
Dadpur
Very deep, poorly drained,
fine soils with silty clay
loam surface texture on
nearly level concave slope
lowland with very slight
erosion
Fine,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Typic
Endoaquepts
7 Na-
sicl
Bab4Cx
V
2
Natungr
am
Very deep, Moderately well
drained, fine soils with silty
clay loam surface texture on
nearly level transition land
between upland and lowland
with slight erosion
Fine,
mixed,
hyperthermic,
Typic
Endoaquepts
8 Na-
cl
Bab4Cx
V
2
Natungr
am
Very deep, Moderately well
drained, fine soils with clay
loam surface texture on
nearly level transition land
between upland and lowland
with slight erosion
Fine,
mixed,
hyperthermic,
Typic
Endoaquepts
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 353
Table 4: Description of Soil mapping units in Gotu Cluster
Map
unit
Soil
Unit PPU Units
Soil
series Description Soil Taxonomy
1 Da-c
Bab4CeP2
Dadpur
Very deep, poorly drained, fine soils
with clay surface texture on nearly level
concave slope lowland with very slight
erosion
Fine,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Typic
Endoaquepts
2 Da-
sic Bab4CeP1 Gotu
Very deep, poorly drained, fine soils
with clay surface texture on nearly level
concave slope lowland with very slight
erosion
Fine-silty,
mixed
hyperthermic
Fluventic
Haplustepts
3 Da-
sicl
Bab4CeP1
Gotu
Very deep, poorly drained, fine soils
with silty clay loam surface texture on
nearly level concave slope lowland with
very slight erosion
Fine-silty,
mixed
hyperthermic
Fluventic
Haplustepts
4 Ra-l
Bab4CxV1
Ramnagar Very deep, well drained, fine-loamy
soils with loam surface texture on nearly
level convex slope upland with slight
erosion
Fine-loamy,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Fluventic
Haplustepts
5 Ra-sil
Bab4CxV1
Ramnagar Very deep, well drained, fine-loamy
soils with silt loam surface texture on
nearly level convex slope upland with
slight erosion
Fine-loamy,
mixed,
hyperthermic
Fluventic
Haplustepts
6 Go-sil Bab4Le2Pl Gotu
Very deep, well drained, fine silty soils
with silt loam surface texture on nearly
level to very gently sloping levee with
slight erosion
Fine-silty,
mixed
hyperthermic
Fluventic
Haplustepts
7 Go-
sicl Bab4Le2Pl Gotu
Very deep, well drained, fine silty soils
with silty clay loam surface texture on
nearly level to very gently sloping levee
with slight erosion
Fine-silty,
mixed
hyperthermic
Fluventic
Haplustepts
Table 5: Physical and chemical characteristics of soils
Depth
(cm)
Ho
rizo
n Particle size
distribution (%) pH
(1:2.5) EC
OC
(%)
CEC
Cmol (+) Kg-
1
Exchangeable cations
Cmol (+) Kg-1
Sand silt clay Ca+
+
Mg+
+
Na+ K
+
Gotu - Fine-silty, mixed hyperthermic Fluventic Haplustepts
0-15 Ap 2.0 74.4 23.6 6.3 0.11 0.63 16.9 8.8 1.5 0.4 0.2
15-38 2Bw1 0.7 61.7 37.6 6.4 0.07 0.27 19.2 10.0 1.7 0.5 0.2
38-55 2Bw2 0.9 67.5 31.6 6.8 0.17 0.19 18.0 10.0 1.6 0.4 0.2
55-85 3C1 1.2 82.4 16.4 7.2 0.17 0.07 14.0 8.6 1.4 0.4 0.2
85-140 4C2 1.5 49.7 48.8 7.3 0.16 0.24 20.0 12.0 1.6 0.7 0.4
Dadpur - Fine, mixed, hyperthermic, Typic Endoaquepts
0-10 Ap 4.4 41.8 53.8 6.6 0.27 1.1 17.1 9.3 1.6 0.7 0.2
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 354
10-.23 Bw1g 4.5 40.1 55.4 6.7 0.17 0.81 16.8 9.6 1.6 0.8 0.2
23-51 Bw2g 3.9 40.6 55.5 6.8 0.14 0.32 17.0 9.6 1.6 0.8 0.3
51-95 Bw3g 5.7 42.7 51.6 6.7 0.09 0.35 16.7 9.5 1.5 0.7 0.3
95-135 Bw4g 10.1 50.4 39.5 6.6 0.1 0.27 15.8 8.7 1.5 0.5 0.2
Puinan- Coarse-silty, mixed, hyperthermic Typic Fluvaquents
0-10 Ap 15.6 68.7 15.7 4.9 0.11 0.65 8.2 3.9 0.9 0.2 0.1
10-30 A2 10.1 72.2 17.7 5.3 0.14 0.34 8.8 4.0 1.3 0.2 0.1
30-44 2C1 7.8 82 10.2 5.6 0.08 0.13 8.0 3.9 1.2 0.2 0.1
44-84 2C2 10.7 67.6 21.7 5.7 0.07 0.1 10.4 5.0 1.4 0.3 0.1
84-112 2C3 19.6 55.5 24.9 5.9 0.07 0.12 12.0 6.2 1.4 0.3 0.1
112-
148
2C4 21.3 56.1 22.6 5.9 0.08 0.12 12.1 6.4 1.4 0.3 0.1
Ramnagar- Fine-loamy,mixed, hyperthermic Fluventic Haplustepts
0-15 Ap 37.0 43.1 19.9 7.4 0.38 0.69 9.0 5.5 1.1 0.3 0.1
15-32 2Bw1 30.8 37.5 31.7 7.6 0.24 0.17 11.8 7.5 1.4 0.5 0.1
32-56 2Bw2 30.1 39.4 30.5 7.7 0.15 0.20 12.2 8.0 1.4 0.1 9.9
56-91 3C1 44.5 33.7 21.8 7.8 0.13 0.14 9.8 6.6 1.2 0.3 0.1
91-130 3C2 37.9 35.9 26.2 7.7 0.07 0.06 11.4 7.2 1.3 0.4 0.1
Natungram- Fine, mixed, hyperthermic, Typic Endoaquepts
0-13 Ap 13.6 50.5 35.9 5.9 0.29 0.82 14.8 7.8 1.3 0.6 0.4
13-29 Bw1 10.8 46.3 42.9 6 0.36 0.53 14.2 8.0 1.2 0.7 0.2
29-50 2Bw2 7.6 63.6 28.8 6.2 0.4 0.27 16.0 8.8 1.4 1.0 0.2
50-77 2Bw3 7 44.3 48.7 6.3 0.38 0.19 15.7 8.9 1.3 0.9 0.2
77-101 2Bw4 10.4 42 47.6 6.5 0.32 0.27 14.2 8.2 1.3 1.0 0.2
101-
135
3C 24 50.1 25.9 6.7 0.24 0.1 15.9 9.3 1.5 1.0 0.3
4.2.1. Bab4Le2Pl (Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very gently sloping lower
levee under plantation)
Levee soil (Bab4Le2Pl) consists of very deep, well drained very gently sloping levee and
have yellowish brown to dark yellowish brown silt loam to silty clay loam surface soil and
dark brown to very dark grayish brown, silty clay loam to silt loam sub surface soil.
Yellowish brown to dark yellowish brown mottles present in the profiles. Levee soil is mostly
occupied by banana and mango plantation. The levee soil (Gotu series) is a member of fine-
silty, mixed, hyperthermic family of Fluventic Haplustepts.
4.2.2. Bab4CeP1 (Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very gently concave slope
low land under paddy cultivation having high moisture)
The Bab4CeP1 soil (Dadpur series) consists of very deep, poorly drained; very dark grayish
brown to dark brown silt clay to silty clay loam surface soil and dark gray to very dark
grayish, with yellowish brown to dark yellowish brown mottles, having silty clay to clayey
sub surface soil and medium sized iron and manganese concretions are common throughout
the profile. The soil of Bab4CeP1 (Dadpur series) is a member of fine, mixed, hyperthermic
family of Typic Endoaquepts.
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 355
4.2.3. Bab4CeP2 (Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very gently concave slope
under paddy cultivation having low moisture)
The Bab4CeP2 soil (Dadpur series) consists of very deep, poorly drained, very fine texture
soils and have dark brown clayey surface texture with very dark grayish brown to very dark
gray, clay to silty clay texture in subsurface. Medium sized iron and manganese concretions
present throughout the profile. This soil of Bab4CeP2 (Dadpur series) is a member of fine,
mixed, hyperthermic family of Typic Endoaquepts.
4.2.4. Bab4CxV1 (Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very gently convex slope
under vegetable cultivation dominantly potato)
The Bab4CxV1 soil consists of very deep, well drained to moderately well drained, sandy
loam to loam soils on the surface and silty loam to silty clay loam in the sub surface. Two soil
series was identified in Bab4CxV1 unit. Puinan soil series consists of very deep, well
drained, coarse loamy texture in control section. The colour of soil in control section varies
from light yellowish brown to grayish brown. The soils have yellowish brown to dark
yellowish brown mottles in the profile. Puinan soil series is a member of fine-silty, mixed,
hyperthermic family of Typic Haplustepts. Ramnagar soil series consists of very deep, well
drained, fine-loamy texture in control and have dark brown loam to silt loam surface soil dark
brown to very dark grayish brown, clay loam to loam sub surface soil with yellowish brown
to brownish yellow mottles in the profile. Ramnagar soil series is a member of fine-loamy,
mixed, hyperthermic family of Fluventic Haplustepts.
4.2.5. Bab4CxV2 (Bengal basin alluvial plain, nearly level to very gently convex slope
under mixed type of vegetable cultivation)
The Bab4CxV2 soil (Natungram series) consists of very deep, moderately well drained, fine,
dark brown, moderately acidic, silty clay loam to clay loam texture surface soils and dark
brown to very dark gray, silty clay to silt loam texture sub surface soils. Medium sized iron
and manganese concretions are present in the profile. The Bab4CxV2 soil (Natungram series)
is a member of fine, mixed, hyperthermic family of Typic Endoaquepts.
5. Conclusion
From the study it can be concluded that applying the technique of large scale mapping using
high resolution satellite data accompanied by DEM in GIS environment helps developing
PPU-soil relationship for site-specific management on cost-effective basis especially at farm
level. Once the PPU-soil relationship established it can be extended for faster mapping at
precision level with plot wise information on morphology, resource potential and constraints.
6. References
1. Bell, J.C., D.F. Grigaland P.C.Bates. (2000), A soil-terrain model for estimating
spatial patterns of soil organic carbon. P295-310. In J.P.Wilson and J.Gallant (ed.)
Terrain analysis: Principles and applications. Wiley & Sons. New York
2. Buringh, P. (1960), The application of aerial photographs in soil surveys. Manual of
Photographic Interpretation. American Society of Photogrammetry. Washington DC
Integration of high resolution satellite data, DEM and GIS for large scale mapping – A case study from lower
Gangetic alluvial plain of India
Tapati banerjee
International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences
Volume 5 Issue 2, 2014 356
3. Gessler, P.E., I.D.Morre, N.J.McKenzie and P.J. Ryan (1995), Soil landscape
modeling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int J.GIS 9:421-432
4. Irvin. B.J., S.J.Ventura and B.K. Slater. (1997), Fuzzy and isodata classification of
landform elements from digital terrain data in Pleasant Valley, Wisconsin, Geoderma
77:134-154
5. Jenny,H. (1941), Factors of soil formations. New York. Mac Graw-Hill. 1941
6. Mermut A.R., Eswaran,H. (2001), Some major developments in soil science since the
mid 1960s. Geoderma 100:403-426
7. Moore, I.D., P.E. Gessler, G.A., Nielsen, and G.A.Peterson. (1993), Soil attribute
prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci Soc. Am. J. 57:443-452
8. Salehi, M.H., Eghbal M.K., Khademi H. (2003), Comparison od soil variability in a
detailed and a reconnaissance soil map in central Iran. Geoderma 111:45-56
9. Sarkar D., T.H.Das, T.Chattopadhyay & M.Velayutham (2001), Soils of Hugli district
for Optimising Land Use, NBSS & LUP, Nagpur,91p.
10. Soil Survey Staff, (1992), Soils of West Bengal for Optimising Land Use. NBSS Publ.
27b (Soils of India Seties). National Bureau of Soil Survey & Land Use Planning.
11. Soil Survey Staff (1993), Soil Survey Manual, Agriculture Handbook No 18, US
Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA, 437 pp.
12. Soil Survey Staff, (2003), Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 9th edition, USDA.