intellectual property basics thad mcmurray intellectual property manager
TRANSCRIPT
Intellectual Intellectual PropertyPropertyBasicsBasics
Thad McMurrayThad McMurrayIntellectual Property ManagerIntellectual Property Manager
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Types of ProtectionPatent
Design
Utility
Copyright
Trademark / Servicemark
Trade Secret/Know How
What is “Intellectual Property”?What is “Intellectual Property”?
SM
TM
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
IP ProtectionIP Protection
Copyrights Life + 70 years OR 95/120 Life + 70 years OR 95/120 yearsyears
Trademarks Potentially ForeverPotentially Forever
Trade Secrets Potentially ForeverPotentially Forever
Patent 20 years20 years
First steps: Knowledgeable ResearcherKnowledgeable Researcher
Laboratory NotebooksLaboratory Notebooks
Patent DisclosuresPatent Disclosures
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
CopyrightCopyright
A right granted by U.S. Federal lawOriginal expression found in works of authorship fixed in tangible medium
Section 102(a): literary works (including computer programs); musical works; dramatic works; pantomimes and choreographic works; pictorial, graphic and sculptural works; motion pictures and audiovisual works; and,sound recordings and architectural works.
Exclusive Rights:1. Reproduction
2. Preparation of derivative works3. Distribution via public sale, rental, lease or lending4. Public performance or display of works including a literary, musical, dramatic, artistic or digital work
Arises automatically the moment an original work of authorship is fixed in a tangible medium of expression
Last 70 years after author’s death, or 95/120 years
Laboratory NotebooksLaboratory Notebooks
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Laboratory NotebooksLaboratory Notebooks
Bound notebookBound notebook
Sequentially numbered pagesSequentially numbered pages
Record in inkRecord in ink
Cross out, don’t erase (mistakes only)Cross out, don’t erase (mistakes only)
No blank space: lines to bottomNo blank space: lines to bottom
Explain what you feel is novelExplain what you feel is novel
Cross reference (even e-records)Cross reference (even e-records)
Securely affix insertsSecurely affix inserts (sign and date across edge)(sign and date across edge)
Sign and date entries, changes, correctionsSign and date entries, changes, corrections
SecureSecure
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
What should be included?
Instruments used
Experimental data
Concepts and ideas
Procedures and protocols
Formulas and calculations
Content/date of outside collaborations
Raw data/results (both favorable and unfavorable)
Results of brainstorming sessions (identify contributors of novel ideas)
Laboratory NotebooksLaboratory Notebooks
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Identify the project for each entryIdentify the project for each entry
Write complete descriptions, recording all Write complete descriptions, recording all the “little details”:the “little details”:
What was doneWhat was doneWho did itWho did itWhy it was doneWhy it was doneWho suggested itWho suggested itWhat were the resultsWhat were the resultsWhat conclusions can be drawnWhat conclusions can be drawn
Laboratory NotebooksLaboratory Notebooks
Invention DisclosuresInvention Disclosures
First line of protecting your IP
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Disclosure– Protecting IP - Any public disclosure before filing
appropriate intellectual property protection will adversely affect patenting or other forms of protection.
– Give yourself time - initial disclosure assessment can take several months.
• The sooner you submit your disclosure, the easier to fully review invention and secure any intellectual property rights.
• Alert Corporate Counsel or appropriate management of any needs for early disclosure.
– ALWAYS USE an NDA if you must disclose potential IP subject matter.
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Disclosure (con’d)– Evaluation - When you submit a disclosure the
company evaluates it for commercial potential. • This evaluation includes market and patentability
assessments.
– Not all inventions are patentable - For an invention to be patented, it must meet the legal standards of novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness, as outlined by the USPTO.
• An assessment is made for each disclosure. You may be asked to review certain patents and publications to help determine if they impact the patentability of your disclosure.
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Disclosure (con’d)– Insufficient commercial potential - It is important to
understand that even though a discovery may be patentable, the commercial potential may not justify the patent investment.
• There are significant costs associated with patenting. • This is an important consideration in the disclosure
assessment process.
– Copyright - Copyright is another form of intellectual property protection.
• Although a patent application may not be appropriate for certain types of technologies, copyright may be. Computer software is often copyrighted rather than patented.
What is Patentable?What is Patentable?
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Patentable
Compositions of matter
Articles of manufacture
Processes or methods
Computer programs
Business methods
Designs
Plants
Improvements on above
What is Patentable?What is Patentable?
Non-Patentable
Data
Abstract ideas
Laws of nature
Natural phenomenon
Naturally occurring organisms
"Anything Under the Sun that is Made by Man" (U.S. Supreme Court, 1980)
If it is the result of human intervention = patentable subject matterIf it is the result of human intervention = patentable subject matter
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Useful Useful
Novel Novel
NonobviousNonobvious
Enablement & Written DescriptionEnablement & Written Description
Requirements for a PatentRequirements for a Patent
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Inventors should not do any of the following without determining whether patent protection should be sought for the technology:
Display or discuss the invention at a seminar, lecture, workshop, poster presentation or trade show open to the public, or
Disclose the invention without a signed Confidentiality (or Non-Disclosure) Agreement, or
Disclose the invention on inventor’s or University’s web site, or
Submit an article to a journal for publication, or
Publish a manuscript, letter, note or chapter in format available to the public, or
Offer for sale or sell the invention, or
Distribute samples of the product to customers or collaborator, or
Consumer or market test a new product, or
Distribute advertising brochures about the invention, or
Demonstrate a prototype to a public group.
Public Use/Offer for SalePublic Use/Offer for Sale
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
NoveltyNovelty
Published or patented anywhere before invented• Journal, Poster presentation, Non-confidential grant
submission, Abstract, Website, Newspaper, Magazine, TV, etc.
Known or used by others in the U.S.• Thesis defense• Presentation
Offer for sale or used publicly in U.S. more than 1 year before application filed
Patent or described in a printed publication more than 1 year before application filed
Another files an application before your invention date
All ElementsAll Elements
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Non-ObviousnessNon-ObviousnessSingle reference or combination of two or
more
Review scope and content of the art
Look at a person of ordinary skill in the field
Contrast art against the “claimed” invention
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Non-ObviousnessNon-ObviousnessArguments against obviousness:
Long Felt But Unsolved NeedsFailure of OthersPrior Art Teaches AwayCommercial successAll elements of the claimed invention are not taught or
suggested by the reference or combination of references
Proposed modification of the reference renders the reference inoperable***Include in application comparison data with state
of the art and/or failure data
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Non-ObviousnessNon-ObviousnessMore Arguments against obviousness:
There is no reasonable expectation of successThere is no teaching suggestion, or motivation to combine the
referencesCombination of elements is not obviousThe prior art does not work, or does not work as well as the
inventionHistory of failed attemptsTwo or more changes away from the cited reference may/should
be considered undue experimentationSimplification of a process may constitute a patentable inventionSuccess of invention not obvious even if it is “obvious to try” – lack
of complexity of invention is not evidence of obviousness.
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Enablement and Enablement and Written DescriptionWritten Description
“It is not the reward for the search, but the compensation for its successful conclusion,” Brenner court
EnablementSpecification: enough detail to enable one to practice your claimed invention(w/o undue experimentation)
Written DescriptionSpecification: evidence that applicant was in possession of what is claimed
Constructive ReductionAble to describe the invention in such
detail that it would enable one skilled in the art to make and use that which is disclosed
Actual ReductionBuild a working inventionAn experimental machine that
does not demonstrate utility is insufficient
Inventorship, Ownership, Cost & ValueInventorship, Ownership, Cost & Value
It is all about making money
The “quid pro quo” of the patent systemEarly disclosure of technical information for a “patent monopoly”, i.e., exclusive rights
Companies may use patents to Show value. Patents are treated as assets
Sell, trade or use as financial vehicles, treated as a commodity.
For product protection from others use
As negotiating leverage in their questionable infringement on others patents
MotivationMotivation
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
InventorshipInventorship
An inventor is . . .
A person who “conceived” or made a material contribution to the conception of the invention or at least some part of the claimed subject matter
Inventorship is a legal determination
An inventor is not. . .
One who merely suggests an area of research or a desired result
(or simply identifies a problem);
One who only follows the instructions of the person who first
conceived the solution;
Co-authors and investigators listed for an academic paper are not
necessarily “inventors”
Supervisors are not necessarily inventors
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
OwnershipOwnershipIn the U.S. ownership initially rests with inventor!
Assignment:Transfer of ownership
Most universities and companies have statutes or company
rules that require assignment
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
When do I have an invention?When do I have an invention?
You might have an invention if . . .
No one has solved the same problem or addressed the same need . . .
In the same way . . .
To achieve the same result
Two elements of an invention
Mental – constructive reduction
Physical – actual reduction
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
CostsCosts
US ApplicationPatentability Search and Opinion: 1.5-5KPatent Preparation: 4-20K
Fees: 500-1100Patent Prosecution: 4-15KAllowance Fees: 700-1500Maintenance Fees: 500- 4,000
PCT and Foreign Filing: 2K
Foreign National Stage Filings: 3-6K
Translation Costs: 5-10K
Prosecution and Annuities: 4-15K
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
It’s a Patent, But Can You Commercialize It?– Only 2 – 4 % of all patents are ever commercialized– Even in Industry only as high as 10%
It Gets Commercialized, But Does It Get to the Market?– Funding– Distribution– Competition
Does It Make Any $?– For the company?– For investors?
Patent ValuePatent Value
EndEnd
Thanks to UB-STOR for providing this material
What is a PatentWhat is a Patent
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Term is 20 years from filing of application
(Everything before June 1995 – choice of which ever is longer 17 yrs from issue or 20 yrs from filing)
Purpose of a Patent?Purpose of a Patent?
Basic Principle:
Inventor – Discloses invention to public in sufficient detail to show something new and significantly different
Government – Grants inventor right to exclude use by others for some period
Patent Gives Right to EXCLUDEEXCLUDEPrevents others from making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing
Path of PatentingPath of Patenting
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Prepare the application – interview and discussion with patent attorney– Draft claims that are broad but narrow enough to overcome any
prior artFile the ApplicationProsecution – dialogue with the patent office
– Examiner will reject application based on prior art that was found– Applicants supply reasons why the claims are patentable in spite
of the cited artOR
– Amend the claimsAllowance and Issuance
Patent PathPatent Path
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Prosecution Flow ChartProsecution Flow ChartPatent application filed
Examination by USPTO
Patent issues Rejection of Application
2nd examination by USPTO
Patent issues Final rejection
Applicant’s reply
Patent issues
Reverse rejection
Appeal to BPAI
Appeal in District Court or
Fed Circuit
Affirm rejection
Denial
Appeal of Final Rejection
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Invent Prepare Patent Application (interview and discussion with patent attorney) (draft broad claims that do not read on prior art)
File Patent Application with USPTO (Provisional or Non-provisional)
Patent Prosecution Application is Published (Negotiation with USPTO) (18 Months after Filing)
Patent Issues (Patent Exclusivity Starts)
3, 7 and 11 Year USPTO Patent expires 20 years Maintenance Fees from filing date
Patenting Process in the U.S.Patenting Process in the U.S.
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
TimelineTimeline
Inve
nt
Dis
clos
e U.S
. fil
ing
dead
line
Inve
nt
Non
-Pro
visi
onal
Paten
t App
licat
ion
Con
vers
ion
Dec
isio
n
&PC
T (fo
reig
n)
Filin
g D
eadl
ine
File
a U
.S.
Provi
sion
al
Paten
t
Applic
atio
n
1 year
Loss of foreign rights
1 year
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Prior ArtPrior Art
Standard against which you have to establish patentability of your invention
Disclosed in publications;
Known to others before you;
Patented by others before you;
Offered for sale or in use by others;
Published or publicly used or disclosed by you more than one year ago
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Duty to DiscloseDuty to Disclose
37 C.F.R. § 1.56(a) imposes a duty on patent prosecutors to disclose information material to patentability. (IDS)– The duty extends to inventors, legal assigns, patent
attorneys and agents, staff, and anyone involved in the preparation and prosecution of the patent application.
– Need to be sure to pass along references material to patentability to outside counsel
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Public DisclosuresPublic Disclosures
Why are these important?
First to invent – One year grace period to
file patent application
First to file – Patent application must be
filed before ANY public disclosure
Abstracts
Manuscripts
Websites
Oral presentations
Poster presentations
Theses and Dissertations
Grant Awards
Offers for sale
Public Use
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Provisional PatentsProvisional Patents
One year lifespan
Not examined by the USPTO
Do not trigger the 20-year patent term
Establish an early filing date
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is an international agreement that created a system for filing patent applications internationally without having to initially file an application in the patent office of each selected country.
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
Invent
File PCT International Patent Application With USPTO (Often relying on Provisional filing date) Prior Art Search Application is Publishedis Carried Out (18 Months after Filing) National Stage Filing and Prosecution(30 Months After Priority Date)
Patenting Process under the PCTPatenting Process under the PCT
Country 1 Prosecution
Country 1 Patent Issues
Country 2 Prosecution
Country 2 Patent Issues
Country 3 Prosecution
Country 3 Patent Issues
Country 4 Prosecution
Country 4 Patent Issues
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
PCT filing is key to securing “global” patent coverage
Benefits of Using PCTBenefits of Using PCT
PCT filing makes technology
more attractive and valuable
PCT filing reduces overall patenting costs
Thad McMurray, Intellectual Property ManagerThad McMurray, Intellectual Property Manager© 2007, Research Foundation of State University of New York, All Rights
Reserved
USPTO: http://www.uspto.govhttp://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
European Patent Office: http://ep.espacenet.com/
www.wipo.int
www.pat2pdf.com
http://www.google.com/patents
The Invention Blog: http://nip.blogs.com/
Patently-O: http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
Just a Patent Examiner: http://just-n-examiner.livejournal.com/
PHOSITA: http://www.okpatents.com/phosita/
Patent the Progress: http://www.promotetheprogress.com/
PDFs of Patent: http://www.pat2pdf.org/
Useful Patent SitesUseful Patent Sites