interactive white boards do they positively impact education?
If you can't read please download the document
DESCRIPTION
Interactive White Boards Do They Positively Impact Education?. By: Sheri Cooper & Lauren Townsend. Advantages of IWBs. Advantages for Students. Increased Participation Increased Motivation Opportunity to delve into complex and abstract subjects. Advantages for Teachers. Flexibility - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Effectiveness of Smart Board Technology
Interactive White Boards
Do They Positively Impact Education?By: Sheri Cooper & Lauren TownsendAdvantages of IWBsAdvantages for StudentsIncreased ParticipationIncreased MotivationOpportunity to delve into complex and abstract subjects
Advantages for TeachersFlexibilityMultiple ResourcesReaches multiple and diverse students
Disadvantages of IWBsDisadvantages for StudentsQuickly lose appealLess time on contentOne note lessonsDisadvantages for Teachers Technical IssuesTeacher TrainingShifts attention from student to technology
Effectiveness of Smart Board TechnologyEffectiveness of Smart Board TechnologyAs a tool for non-linear learningBy accessing text and media Ability to move back and forth among pagesAbility to present the same information in different ways
Effectiveness of Smart Board TechnologyCombines the benefits of interactive computer use with group learningInternet accessVideosLarge screen
Effectiveness of Smart Board TechnologyAs a tool for multi-modal teachingDescriptiveExperimentalMathematicalFigurativeKinesthetic
Effectiveness of Smart Board TechnologyAs a tool for teaching children with disabilitiesManipulatives Auditory and Visual Cues Interactive videoVarious assessment strategies
Effective Use of Smart Board Technology Effective Use of Smart Board TechnologyMust have adequate training and time to find appropriate softwareProvide incentives to increase IWB skillsVendor trainingIn-service trainingTutorialsCooperative learning among teachers
Effective Use of Smart Board Technologymust be an integral part of the lesson, not something tacked on to be funCreate lessons on the IWBUse features in the software
ReferencesAkbas, O., & Pektas, H. M. (2011). The effects of using an interactive whiteboard on the academic achievement of university students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(2) Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469. doi:10.1080/00131910500279551 Betteney, M. (2009). Interactive white boards. English 4--11, (35), 3-5. Blau, I. (2011). Teachers for "Smart Classrooms": The Extent of Implementation of an Interactive Whiteboard-based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers' Instructional Practices. Interdisciplinary Journal Of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 7275-289.Campbell, M. L., & Mechling, L. C. (2009). Small Group Computer-Assisted Instruction With SMART Board Technology : An Investigation of Observational and Incidental Learning of Nontarget Information. Remedial & Special Education, 30(1), 47-57. Giles, R. M., & Shaw, E. L. (2011). SMART boards ROCK! Science and Children, 49(4), 36-37. Harden-Thew, K. (2012). Transition to school, success and an interactive whiteboard. Practically Primary, 17(1), 34-36. How to afford interactive whiteboards. (2011). Technology & Learning, 31(8), 44-46.Jang, S., & Tsai, M. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327- 338. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003 Manny-Ikan, E., Tikochinski, T. B., Zorman, R., & Dagan, O. (2011). Using the interactive white board in teaching and learning - an evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM pilot project.Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects,7, 249-273.
McNamara-Cabral, M. (2012). Idea bank: How a smart board changed my teaching. Music Educators Journal, 98(3), 26-27. doi: 10.1177/0027432112439669Murcia, K. (2010). Multi-modal representations in primary science: What's offered by interactive whiteboard technology. Teaching Science: The Journal Of The Australian Science Teachers Association, 56(1), 23-29. ad, S. N., [email protected]. (2012). An attitude scale for smart board use in education: Validity and reliability studies. Computers & Education, 58(3), 900-907. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.017 ad, S., & zhan, U. (2012). Honeymoon with IWBs: A qualitative insight in primary students' views on instruction with interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1184-1191. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.010 Trel, Y., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381-394. Whitby, P. S., Leininger, M. L., & Grillo, K. (2012). Tips for Using Interactive Whiteboards to Increase Participation of Students With Disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(6), 50-57. Xin, J. F., & Sutman, F. X. (2011). Using the smart board in teaching social stories to students with autism. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(4), 18-24.