interactive whiteboards for teacher training tuyet hayes the university of hawai‘i at mānoa...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Interactive Whiteboards for Teacher Training
Tuyet HayesThe University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa
How familiar are you with interactive whiteboards?A. I don’t know what it is.B. I have only heard of it.C. I have attended a training or lesson that
used one.D. I have delivered a training or lesson that
used one.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Interactive Whiteboards
IWB are a “conglomeration of all previous educational technologies” (Hall & Higgins, 2005)
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Introduction
Within the next five years, one in every five classrooms worldwide will have an IWB (EFY News Network, 2009)
Introduction
Within the next five years, one in every five classrooms worldwide will have an IWB (EFY News Network, 2009)
IWB market for education/training will total $880 million in 2009, and $2 billion by 2014 (Wainhouse Research, 2010)
Introduction
Within the next five years, one in every five classrooms worldwide will have an IWB (EFY News Network, 2009)
IWB market for education/training will total $880 million in 2009, and $2 billion by 2014 (Wainhouse Research, 2010)
Personal motivations
Research Question
What is the impact of integrated IWB use on participant engagement, learning, and interaction?
Intervention
Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Intervention
Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff
What: VoiceThread training using IWB
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Intervention
Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff
What: VoiceThread training using IWB When: Feb 12 - teacher work day
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Intervention
Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff
What: VoiceThread training using IWB When: Feb 12 - teacher work day Where: St. Andrew’s Priory School
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Intervention
Who: 13 lower school (K-5) faculty and staff
What: VoiceThread training using IWB When: Feb 12 - teacher work day Where: St. Andrew’s Priory School Why: Resources and access
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressorare needed to see this picture.
Instructional Strategies
Modeling/Guided Practice
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Instructional Strategies
Opportunities for interaction
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Data collection: Online surveys
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Data collection: Learner response system
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Results: Engagement
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Results: Engagement
Motivating factors included:– “Cool” interactive pen– “HUGE mousepad”– Polling feature– Ease of switching between applications
Surprise that peers were focused
Results: Interaction
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Results: Interaction
Responses focused primarily on learner response system– “Huge hit” with students– Anonymity– “Game-like” atmosphere– Instant feedback
Results: Interaction
Responses focused primarily on learner response system– “Huge hit” with students– Anonymity– “Game-like” atmosphere– Instant feedback
Also mentioned – Ability to write on the board– Trainer’s ability to troubleshoot
Results: Learning
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Results: Learning
Average Pre-test score: 11% Average Posttest score: 88%
Results: Learning
Average Pre-test score: 11% Average Posttest score: 88%
Features that supported learning:– Large display matched their screens– Teacher at board (easier to
see/hear/interact)– Tools: Pen, annotation ability, LRS
Results: Usefulness
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Results: Usefulness
Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.”
Results: Usefulness
Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.”
Key points– Large display– Instant feedback– Student interaction
Results: Usefulness
Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.”
Key points– Large display– Instant feedback– Student interaction
84% rated 4 or 5 (on 1-5 scale)
Results: Usefulness
Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.”
Key points– Large display– Instant feedback– Student interaction
84% rated 4 or 5 (on 1-5 scale) 84% indicated they would use it at least weekly
Results: Usefulness
Teachers were inspired by “how simple and engaging the whiteboard really is.”
Key points– Large display– Instant feedback– Student interaction
84% rated 4 or 5 (on 1-5 scale) 84% indicated they would use it at least weekly 46% anticipated daily use
Discussion
Small sample
Discussion
Small sample Pre and post survey alignment
Discussion
Small sample Pre and post survey alignment Research study topic confusion
Discussion
Small sample Pre and post survey alignment Research study topic confusion Barriers remain
– Insufficient training– Lack of time to develop materials– Other technologies
Conclusion
IWB can be effective for teacher training– Engagement– Interaction– Learning
Conclusion
IWB can be effective for teacher training– Engagement– Interaction– Learning
Secondary benefits– Increase teacher comfort with IWB– Model effective instructional strategies using
IWB
Quote of the Day
“I’m not afraid to use it now. There are a whole host of possibilities running through my head.”
– Participant
Acknowledgements
Dr. Grace Lin Leslie Arakaki ETEC Faculty at UH
Manoa Peers in ETEC
program Family
