international atomic energy agency can cardiac procedures be graded in complexity and related with...

19
International Atomic Energy Agency Can cardiac procedures be Can cardiac procedures be graded in complexity and graded in complexity and related with dose? related with dose? L 8.3

Upload: gerard-austin

Post on 29-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

International Atomic Energy Agency

Can cardiac procedures be Can cardiac procedures be graded in complexity and graded in complexity and

related with dose?related with dose?

L 8.3

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 2Radiation Protection in Cardiology

Educational ObjectivesEducational Objectives

1. Complexity related factors in cardiac interventions

2. Relationship of patient dose with technical and clinical factors

3. Development of complexity index and its utility

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 3Radiation Protection in Cardiology

factors determining patient’s exposure

adequacy of equipment

fluoroscopy time

cine-angiography time

operator’s experienceprocedure complexity

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 4Radiation Protection in Cardiology

fluoro time: 1 m’ 20 sec

total DAP: 102 dGy

simple case straightforward right

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 5Radiation Protection in Cardiology

difficult caseextreme vessel tortuosity

fluoro time: 20 m’

total DAP: 1074 dGy

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 6Radiation Protection in Cardiology

complexity related factors

• age

• number of vessels treated

• occluded vessels

• previous CABG

• poor Ejection Fraction

quantification never proposed

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 7Radiation Protection in Cardiology

Clinical and technical determinants of the Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of PTCA procedures. Analysis in complexity of PTCA procedures. Analysis in

relation to fluoroscopy time relation to fluoroscopy time (Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 51:1-9)(Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 51:1-9)

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 8Radiation Protection in Cardiology

PTCA characteristicsn 402, 21/06/96-08/05/98 (50% of tot)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350one-lesion

multi-lesion

multivessel

76.3%

15.4%8.2%

Stenting 49% (x procedure)

mean fluoro time 11,5’ ± 8,6’

success 96.5 %

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 9Radiation Protection in Cardiology

patients’ characteristicsn 402, M 72 % age 62±11

one vessel

two vessels

three vessels

34.1%34.9%

31%

6% previous CABG mean EF 58% ± 10

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 10Radiation Protection in Cardiology

clinical factors testedclinical factors tested

• age

• sex

• single or multivessel disease

• EF

• previous CABG

no significant correlation with fluoro time or exposure parameters

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 11Radiation Protection in Cardiology

Weight (seconds) score Constant 159 -

lesion B2 (AHA) 151 - lesion > B2 (AHA) 400 1

IVUS 315 - simple stenting 157 -

bifurcation stenting 331 1,5 ostial stenting 346 0,8

occlusion 3 months 943 2,8 moderate tortuosity 234° -

severe tortuosity 1471 4,9 double balloon technique 350* -

double wire technique 140* -

p< 0.001, p<0.01*, p<0.005°

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 12Radiation Protection in Cardiology

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000

r = 0.576P < 0.0001

complexity index/fluoro time correlationmost significant & less operator-dependent variables

Com

ple

xit

y In

dex

Fluoro time (sec)

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 13Radiation Protection in Cardiology

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

simple medium complex CI = 0 CI 1.5 CI > 1.5

215 119 68

Flu

oro

tim

e (s

ec)

complexity index-based stratification fluoro time

P < 0.0001

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 14Radiation Protection in Cardiology

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

simple medium complex CI = 0 CI 1.5 CI > 1.5

215 119 68

Cin

e fr

ames

(n

)complexity index-based stratification cine frames

P = 0.0377

P = ns

P = 0.001

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 15Radiation Protection in Cardiology

0

50

100

150

200

250

DAP

Gy

* cm

2 complexity index-based stratification total DAP

P < 0.0001

P = 0.0015

215 119 68

simple medium complex CI = 0 CI 1.5 CI > 1.5

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 16Radiation Protection in Cardiology

procedural success rate procedural success rate (402 cases, 50% of total activity)(402 cases, 50% of total activity)

97,6

93,3

89,7

84

86

88

90

92

94

96

98

simple medium complex

%

P = 0.00787

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 17Radiation Protection in Cardiology

fluoro time in different diagnostic fluoro time in different diagnostic procedures (844) procedures (844)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Coro only Coro + LV Right cath. Graft Aortogr

min

ute

s

2.6±3.4 2.7±2.3

6.1±6.0 6.1±4.9

6.8±7.1

65%

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 18Radiation Protection in Cardiology

• In our experience, fluoroscopy time and total DAP were directly related to technical and not to clinical factors

• The weight of these factors can be quantified in order to anticipate the radiation dose needed to treat patients undergoing complex procedures

conclusions (I)conclusions (I)

Lecture 8.3: Complexity 19Radiation Protection in Cardiology

• Comparison of different centers and operators for quality control assessment, as well as the definition of appropriate fluoroscopy time and DAP doses, should take into account complexity indexes

• Further studies in different institutions are warranted to corroborate this data

conclusions (II)conclusions (II)