international conference territorial impact assessment of ... · new ‘kid on the block’...

// What Territorial Impact Assessment of Territorial Cohesion in Italian regions

(Territorial Cohesion, Place based evidence model, Policy evaluation, Inner and metropolitan peripheries, Territorial Planning, Green economy)

Maria Prezioso

International Conference

Territorial Impact Assessment of Territorial Cohesionin Italy and Europe

Rome, 11-12 April 2019University of Rome “Tor Vergata”

PRIN (Research projects of National interest in Human Science – duration: 3 years):“Territorial Impact Assessment of the territorial cohesion in Italian regions. Place evidence model for assessing policies devoted to green economy in inner and metropolitan peripheries” 4/16/2019PowerPoint template 16:92

0- Measure, by a new TIA

method and tool GIS of the distance from the 2020 targets achievable through the Policy of Territorial Cohesion

- Test policy activities 2020 in Italian regions for the territorialized use of the Policy and funds ofCohesion in offering Services of General Interest in inner peripheries

- relaunch a territorialised cohesion policy post-2020

- Insert TIA and TC into a common methodology of sustainable territorial planning (New Territorial Agenda post 2020)

- development of new TC indicators and recommendations towards the green economy development

Research questions (1-2 years):- what TC means for Italy in Europe- how to create a common policy and language able to supportdecision making in Italy

New methodology, tools and placeevidence need 4/16/2019PowerPoint template 16:93

Starting from the status quo ofCohesion Policy at 2017 …

PowerPoint template 16:94 4/16/2019

In a feasible and practical way

TC is a public policy issue

10 Units (more than 60 researchers involved) are holding a close dialogue between them and with:

Institutional GovernamentalObservators- Precidency of Italian Ministries

Council- Agency of Territorial Cohesion- MIT- MATTM- Committe of Regions

and 76 regional/local stakeholders

…EC possible options (toward EU budget 2021-2027): what scenario?

PRIN Methodological Approach Adoption of a complex process by a ‘logical tree’ named STeMA that involves some methods

(geographical, statistical, econometric, math) in order to: i) guarantee simple results, ii) makecoherent integration of instruments, techniques, data, weights/judgements and mapping The process is able to select and produce: indicators, quali-quantitative evaluation, place evidence, territorialised results and policy recommendations It incorporates a TIA method and GIS that follow rules coherent with the EU evaluation

expectations (EP, DG Regio, CoR, etc.) After 2 years of intensive work, the STeMA methodological approach has produced:

- A critical review of scientific and ‘grey’ literature (general and sectoral, concepts, programs, projects, etc.) of the Italian policy framework (national, regional and local) related to the European TC

- Shared definitions, surveys and synthesis of concepts- Selection of 73 indicators (metadata and data) covering Italian NUTS 2 and 3 and mapping- ex ante territorialised evaluation of 4 main determinants (Europe 2020 Strategy: smart, sustainable,

inclusive and spending of funds) by STeMA-T IA- 7 Systemic territorial regional typologies able to territorialise the TIA results of Europe2020 Strategy

The 3rd year will be dedicated to develop the ex post assessment of policies at regional level(2020 evaluation and post), detailed regional analysis and policy recommendations

Some key words are connected to TC

• Cohesion, Cohesion Policy and Territory• Competitiveness and productivity• Sustainability• Diversity (territorial and geographical)• Inclusion and social inclusion• Equity• Territorial Impact Assessment• Inner periphery (in Italy: metro peripheries and internal

areas)• Territorial Capital and Spatial Planning• Green Economy

g g p pTC is

the whole of a society’s inherent values, a place’s implicit identity, the collective and individual feeling of a distinct region (J. Brunhes, C. Vallaux, 1921)

system (G. Jaia,1938) that “contribute to manage, discipline, integrate individual and collective activities”

economic regime (U. Toschi, 1948) “force of the organization … that identify with political territorial units”

Determinant in all cultures, a real value only in western societies’ post-capitalism systems, which exploit it in order to spread, having accepted competition, free market access of all enterprises producing similar goods, and price competitiveness (M. Weber, 1945)

content and category of development (J. Schumpeter, 1954)

complex of principles and institutions on which, in a given historical time, the organization of a state processes of goods and services’ production and distribution is based (W. Sombart, 1967 and the neo-schumpeterians)

capability of spreading settled socio-territorial models, adherence to shared socio-economic principles, potential for positively affecting income, gross domestic product, wealth, interest rate through regional operating Programmes regarding to contents and categories (Prezioso, 2006)

an incremental value resulting from European Cohesion policy (Mairate, 2006);

Discourse that derives from the analysis of a situation, and is also liable to influence that situation (Dühr, Colomb and Nadin, 2010; Elissalde, Santamaria, 2013).

Territorial Cohesion means (PRIN shared definition) objective of the politics of spatial development of the Union territorialises the politics of economic and social cohesion in relationship to the diversity of the contexts strengthens the attention to the territory (place-based evidence) and its territorial capital in a region (geographical) TC level depends from quality, efficiency and identity of the territorial systems

as their interrelations an ability to synergistically combine existing resources valorising the efficiency of the territorial systems an ability to bring out socio-territorial models and governance, adherence to shared principles, the

potential to influence positively income, gross domestic product and wealth regional individualities and capacity to strengthen synergistically the territorial capital it is connected with the knowledge of the territories in order to define: territorialised policies; the integrated

development of the territories understood as spaces in which the life of the citizens takes place; the intersectoral coordination of the policies; a system of multi-level governance, from local to European; cooperation between territories to strengthen European integration.

consistent with the concepts of Sustainability, it may refer to the behavioural relationship between the components of a society and the overall level of economic integration, social and functional, and of decision-making and operational collaboration, towards goals of common utility, achieved between the different components and the different actors within a certain geographical area. Territorial cohesion is the whole of the relations between territories and human groups that inhabit it, for which the human group recognizes and shares within it the territory, the intrinsic values, the kind of life that characterizes it, the socio-political organization built, together and with rules shared and accepted.

… and that TC is linked to territorial efficiency and massAs economic scientists suggest: Barca Report 2009, 2011 and 2018, Science Po 2010, Fitoussi, Stiglitz, Senn Report 2013, BES Composite Index 2013, UrbBES Report 2015:

the closer relationships with GDP is discussed and the capacity building efficiency emerges as main issue

polycentrism (Davoudi, 2004) appears as the better form receipting and increasing TC supported from an horizontal cooperative organisation based on the mass (population, resources, funds)

each “socio-economic system” (urban, rural, urban-rural, peripheral, inner, internal) has the its owenreal expression and dimension of Territorial Cohesion

at different subsidiary level (scales)national

regional

sub-regional

local

TC is ever located and different

Cohesion

MassEfficiency

What TIA, in order to measure and apply a Territorial CohesionPolicy 2020 and post

STeMA_TIA methodology

4/16/2019PowerPoint template 16:911

2 TC

TC is ever localised

PRIN compared models in EU


Producing and important narrativeTIA relates to many dimensions, including: financial, capacity building and better regulation, legislative revision/integration, policies, NOP-ROP, etc.The story is long to tell …. But Geography is on 6° place in the EU for research on TIA which also include SEA and EIA

TIA definitions, concepts, conceptualisation (from research)


TIA as a basic pre-requirement in cross-border projects (ESPON 3.1 2004, p. 428, and 2018)

Measure of Competitiveness in Sustainability (Prezioso in ESPON 3.3 2006)

Generator of Place evidence (Schön, 2009)

‘Novel’ to be applied in large area in order to minimize the costs arising from the lack of political coordination in acting territorial, both horizontally and vertically (Evers, 2011)

Competitive territorial capacity measurement in sustainability on a cohesive basis (Prezioso, 2006, 2008, 2011)

Planning Power Tool (Farinos, 2013)

New ‘kid on the block’ (Madeiros, 2014)

Means of action for Territorial Agenda 2020 and Urban Agenda 2020

Coordination mechanism (Eser, Böhme, 2015)

Ex ante measure of Cohesion Policy (Camagni, 2010; Bböhme et al. 2015) and territorial policy (Prezioso, 2008, 2015, 2018)

TIA in UE


strong narrative background since 2001, TIA constitutes a means and a procedure to support and create awareness in the policy/decision maker

It creates correlation between ‘policy and financing targeting and policy awareness of expected effects

It allows to reduce/overcome the subjective perception of the impact of EU interventions (Petzold, European Committee of regions, 2016)

TIA is applied to policies, funds, CBC, strategies, administrative capacity, legislation, etc.

Questions raised by the EU:- How do European economic and social and investment challenges change using regional TIA?- Institutions and governance: can TIA improve and strengthen public administration and effective management in the use of funds?- Does TIA improve the use of resources for policies? making them more effective and efficient?

STEP 1: TIA Logical Framework of TC by STeMA(Prezioso, Coronato 2017)

Sustainability• Climate Change• Energy• Competitiveness• Biodiversity

Smart• Innovation• Education• Digital Society

Inclusive• Employment• Poverty and

exclusion

(Concepts)• Competitiveness• Territorial

Capital

(Concepts)• Green

economy• Sustainability

(Concepts)Social

Inclusion

In Metropolitan and inner peripheriesTerritorialisation

indicators indicators indicators

Categories

Indicators

Sectors and Types

Determinants

Smart Growth

Education and Human CapitalSupply of educationHuman capital internationalisation

Digital society

Bridging digital divided and digital

transitionTechnological\innovative dissemination

for the enterprises and institutionsSupport to transregional cooperative

projectsUse/development of environmental

friendly techologiesQuality certification and assessment

tools

Innovation and R&D

R&D infrastructuresSupport to BATDevelopment of recycling technologies

and products (circular economy)

Transport/network

Development of telecomunication

networksDevelopment of energy networks

List of Policy

Sustainable growth

Competitiveness and

Economic development

Support Local productive

identityPromotion of a global enterprise

cultureNew business/service

instrumentsInflation/Deflaction controlInternationalisation of good and

services

Natural Resources efficiency

Use of renovable resourcesActive Protection of Natural

resourcesReduction of Natural

Inclusive Growth

Age

Reinvolvement of aging people

Support leisureSocial integrationChild protectionPoverty reductionPolicies dissemination for

transparency and efficency of

burocracyCultural integration

Employment

Homogeneisation of enterprise

costsSupport enterprise creationSupport employer mobilitySupport equal opportunitiesSocial Programme FinancingS f

Brid

ging

dig

ital d

ivid

ed

Tech

nolo

gica

l\inno

vativ

e di

ssem

inat

ion

for t

he e

nter

pris

es a

nd in

stitu

tions

Supp

ort t

o tra

nsre

gion

al c

oope

rativ

e pr

ojec

ts

Use

/dev

elop

men

t of e

nviro

nmen

tal

frien

dly

tech

olog

ies

Qua

lity c

ertif

icat

ion

and

asse

ssm

ent

tool

s

R&D

infra

stru

ctur

es

Supp

ort t

o BA

T

Dev

elop

men

t of r

ecyc

ling

tech

nolo

gies

of

was

te

Supp

ly o

f edu

catio

n

Hum

an c

apita

l inte

rnat

iona

lisat

ion

Rei

nvol

vem

ent o

f agi

ng p

eopl

e

Supp

ort l

eisu

re

Soci

al in

tegr

atio

n

Chi

ld p

rote

ctio

n

Pove

rty re

duct

ion

Polic

ies

diss

emin

atio

n fo

r tra

nspa

renc

y an

d ef

ficen

cy o

f bur

ocra

cy

Cul

tura

l inte

grat

ion

Supp

ort L

ocal

pro

duct

ive

iden

tity

Prom

otio

n of

a g

loba

l ent

erpr

ise

cultu

re

New

bus

ines

s/se

rvic

e in

stru

men

ts

Infla

tion

cont

rol

Inte

rnat

iona

lisat

ion

of g

ood

and

serv

ices

Hom

ogen

eisa

tion

of e

nter

pris

e c

osts

Supp

ort e

nter

pris

e cr

eatio

n

Supp

ort e

mpl

oyer

mob

ility

Supp

ort e

qual

opp

ortu

nitie

s

Dev

elop

men

t of

tele

com

unic

atio

n ne

twor

ks

Dev

elop

men

t of e

nerg

y ne

twor

ks

Incr

ease

of p

hisi

cal a

cces

sibi

lity

Use

of r

enov

able

reso

urce

s

Activ

e Pr

otec

tion

of N

atur

al re

sour

ces

Red

uctio

n o

f Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es

cons

umpt

ion

Nat

ural

haz

ard

prev

entio

n

Ener

gy p

olic

ies

Flex

ible

Mec

hani

sms

(ETS

, CD

M)

Clim

ate

Activ

e Pr

otec

tion

Soci

al P

rogr

amm

e Fi

nanc

ing

Safe

ty

Supp

ort W

elfa

re

Effects Ci Bj' Bj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 3 3 Aumento del livello di produttività 0.00 0 49 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 1

2 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 2 3 1 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 Aumento della domanda di beni e servizi green 0.00 0 42 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2

3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 1 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 Aumento del livello di occupazione nei settori green 0.00 0 46 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 1

4 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 Aumento della salute pubblica 0.00 0 26 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 2

5 1 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 2 Aumento delle attività legate al tempo libero 0.00 0 11 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2

6 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Riduzione dei rif iuti 0.00 0 22 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 2

7 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 Processo produtitvo a basso impatto sull'ambiente 0.00 0 34 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 1

8 1 3 1 2 2 3 1 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Aumento del livello di riciclo dei rif iuti 0.00 0 25 1 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1

9 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Prevenzione dai rischi naturali 0.00 0 40 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 3 2

10 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 1 Riduzione delle polveri sottili 0.00 0 29 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2

11 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 Uso efficiente delle acque 0.00 0 36 2 1 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 1 3 2 3

12 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 Diminuzione del livello di CO2 0.00 0 36 1 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 1 3 3 1 1

13 2 2 3 1 2 3 Miglior livello di perequazione 0.00 0 21 1 2 3 2 2 1 3 2 3 2

14 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 Aumento offerta ecoservizi 0.00 0 25 2 3 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1

15 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 Dimunuzione del livello di povertà 0.00 0 26 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3

16 2 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 Aumento dell'occupazione femminile nei settori green 0.00 0 32 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3

17 2 2 3 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 Aumento del livello di benessere 0.00 0 45 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 1 3 1 1 2 3 2 3

18 3 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 1 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 Efficienza energetica 0.00 0 36 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 2

19 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 Internazionalizzazione 0.00 0 32 3 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 1 2 3 3 1

20 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 Aumento dell'attrattività territoriale nei settori green 0.00 0 19 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 3 2

21 3 3 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 Aumento della connettività culturale green 0.00 0 31 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 2 2 2

22 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Aumento dell'offerta di lavoro green 0.00 0 19 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 2 2

23 2 2 3 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 3 Innovazione di prodotto/processo 0.00 0 28 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 3

24 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 Riduzione del rischio di esclusione sociale 0.00 0 24 1 1 2 2 3 1 3 3 3 2 2 1

25 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 1 3 2 2 1 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Aumento delle infrastrutture materiali ed immateriali green (connettività)

0.00 0 36 3 3 1 3 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3

26 3 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 Aumento degli aiuti pubblici al settore green 0.00 0 50 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 1

27 2 2 1 2 3 1 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 3 3 3 Uso delle rinnovabili 0.00 0 39 2 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 1 3 1

28 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 3 Cambio della Tecnologia sostenibile 0.00 0 28 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 1 2 1

29 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 Aumento della capacità innovativa 0.00 0 34 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 1

30 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 Aumento della formazione nei settori green 0.00 0 26 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 1 1 2

31 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 Aumento attrattività (IDE, turismo, ecc) 0.00 0 21 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 2

32 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 2 2 3 1 2 3 3 Aumento della cooperazione transnazionale 0.00 0 33 1 3 2 3 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 3 3 2

32 37 0 46 40 30 35 44 38 7 8 40 43 14 12 8 16 28 33 22 41 19 11 69 15 23 32 22 22 14 21 31 24 3 33 4 24 25 14 25 14 24 2 14 14 35 34 8 17 14 17 14 22 21 22 22 33 20 8 8 31 30 10 16 25 7 8 22

Stu

dent

i uni

vers

itari

iscr

itti n

ei in

set

tori

gree

n

Pop

olaz

ione

laur

eata

in s

etto

ri gr

een

Indi

ce d

i dip

ende

nza

inno

vativ

a

Uni

vers

ità e

cen

tri d

i Ric

erca

acc

redi

tati

al C

arbo

on F

oot P

rint

Cap

acità

inno

vativ

a

Cer

tific

azio

ne a

mbi

enta

le E

mas

Bre

vetti

ver

di re

gist

rati

allo

Eur

opea

n P

aten

t Offi

ce (E

PO

) (nu

mer

o pe

r milio

ne d

i abi

tant

i)

Num

ero

di li

cenz

e ec

olab

el

Qua

lità

ambi

enta

li di

org

aniz

zazi

one

e di

impr

ese

(n. d

i org

aniz

zazi

oni c

ertif

icat

e IS

O 1

4001

og

ni 1

00.0

00 im

pres

e)P

oten

za e

ffici

ente

lord

a de

lle fo

nti r

inno

vabi

li

Con

sum

i per

set

tore

ver

de

Ene

rgia

pro

dotta

da

font

i rin

nova

bili

Pro

duzi

one

netta

di e

nerg

ia e

lettr

ica

attra

vers

o im

pian

ti ge

oter

moe

lettr

ici,

eolic

i e fo

tovo

ltaic

i

Cap

acità

di e

spor

tare

in s

etto

ri a

dom

anda

din

amic

a

Live

llo d

i esp

orta

zion

i (€)

Live

llo d

i im

porta

nzio

ni (€

)

Acc

essi

bilit

à G

reen

Cos

te n

on b

alne

abili

per

inqu

inam

ento

Den

sità

di p

ista

cic

labi

le

Ser

vio

Car

Sha

ring

Nat

ura

2000

Zone

pro

tette

Age

nda

21

Pro

getto

Sm

art C

ity

VAS

regi

onal

e +

Acco

rdi B

lue

(mar

e e

cost

a)

VIA

regi

onal

e

Vul

nera

bilit

à (s

ism

ica,

idre

olog

ica,

indu

stria

le)

Cap

acità

di a

ttraz

ione

dei

con

sum

i tur

istic

i ver

di

Eco

Par

chi

Gru

ppi d

i ric

erca

inte

nazi

onal

e ne

i set

tori

gree

n

Uni

tà d

i lav

oro

in A

gric

oltu

ra, s

ilvic

oltu

ra e

pes

ca

Uni

tà d

i lav

oro

nei s

ervi

zi g

reen

alle

impr

ese

Pop

olaz

ione

atti

va n

ei s

etto

ri gr

een

Det

razi

one

fisca

le d

el 5

5%

Con

sum

i pro

cap

ite d

i pro

dotti

gre

en

Indi

ce d

ei p

rezz

i al c

onsu

mo

Com

mer

cio

di b

eni g

reen

Com

mer

cio

di s

ervi

zi g

reen

Ince

ntiv

i Fis

cali

Co2

pro

cap

ite n

on e

mes

sa (r

ispa

rmio

pro

cap

ite)

Inve

stim

enti

dire

tti e

ster

i in

gree

n

Ban

da la

rga

per l

e im

pres

e

Azi

ende

zoo

tecn

iche

Opp

ortu

nità

cul

tura

li (v

erdi

)

Turis

mo

verd

e ne

i mes

i non

est

ivi

Pos

ti le

tto a

lber

ghie

ri (v

erdi

)

Stru

tture

rice

ttive

gre

en

Indi

ce d

ei p

rezz

i pro

dotto

Gre

en

Con

sum

i gre

en

GD

P pr

o ca

pite

Inci

denz

a de

lle fa

mig

lie c

on u

n re

ddito

net

to a

l di s

otto

del

la s

oglia

di p

over

tà a

ssol

uta,

per

pr

ovin

cia.

O

ccup

azio

ne fe

mm

inile

nei

set

tori

gree

n

Rifi

uti u

rban

i rac

colti

Rifi

uti u

rban

i sm

altit

i in

disc

aric

a pe

r abi

tant

e

Rifi

uti s

peci

ali r

acco

lti

Rifi

uti s

peci

ali s

mal

titi

Rifi

uti u

rban

i (fra

zion

e um

ida

+ ve

rde)

trat

tati

in im

pian

ti di

com

post

aggi

o

Rac

colta

diff

eren

ziat

a de

i rifi

uti u

rban

i

Acq

ua p

rele

vata

Acq

ua im

mes

sa

Em

issi

one

di C

O2

Sup

eram

ento

sog

lia d

i alla

rme

Tass

o di

feco

ndità

Set

tore

Soc

iale

Live

llo d

i sen

sibi

lità

alla

sos

teni

bilit

à

Live

llo d

i fid

ucia

nel

le is

tituz

ioni

in m

ater

ia g

reen

Fond

i IN

TER

REG

spe

si

Spe

se in

R&S

set

tore

gre

en

Variables

ID data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68

GREEN ECONOMY

Green Economy for Europe 2020 Strategy

Economic development Employment Natural Resources Public HealtClimateTransport/netw orkAgeR&D Human CapitalInnovation

INDICATORS

POLICY EFFECTS

4/16/201920

3Go to logic schema

effects on TC

Territorialization

COMPARE E - E'' PRE-XONDITIONALITY

D Policy impacts B Policy weightsC

Policy

Regional Policy Choice

D' modified policy impacts ꝺ

Regional TC ex ante

E' ex post no territorialised

E'' ex post territorialised

Territorialisation by STFT

Source: Prezioso, 2018

To calculate this ꝺwe created SRFTs

7 SRFTs as base of STeMA TIA 3.0


1. MEGA and Metropolitan Systems in 4 different morphological typologies, with high urban influence andtransnational/national functions able to make cooperation between cities (or city parts) at regional, national,transnational level

2. High Urban influence Systems in 4 different morphological typologies, with transnational/national specialisedfunctions able to make urban-rural cooperation between interconnected areas at regional, national, transnationallevel

3. High Urban influence Systems in 4 different morphological typologies, without specialised functions and lowtransnational/national functions, able to make rural cooperation between authorities in interconnected areas atregional, national, transnational level

4. High Urban influence Systems in 4 different morphological typologies, without specialised functions andtransnational/national functions, not able to make rural cooperation between at regional, national, transnationallevel

5. Low Urban influence Systems in 4 different morphological typologies, with transnational/national specialisedfunctions able to make rural cooperation between interconnected areas at regional, national, transnational level

6. Low Urban influence Systems in 4 different morphological typologies, with regional/local functions, not able tomake rural cooperation between interconnected areas at regional, local level

7. Low Urban influence Systems in 4 different morphological typologies, without specialised functions andtransnational/national functions, not able to make rural cooperation between at regional, national, transnationallevel.

Combining 7 typologies STeMA (Prezioso, 2003, 2006, 2011) revisited taking into account 4 types of territories with geographical diversity (ESPON, 2016), 4 types of inner periphery and 5 FRTs (ESPON, 2017)

IT1079 Toscana 4

IT1080 Massa-Carrara 3

IT1081 Lucca 3

IT1082 Pistoia 3

IT1083 Firenze 2

IT1084 Prato 3

IT1085 Livorno 2

IT1086 Pisa 2

IT1087 Arezzo 6

IT1088 Siena 6

IT1089 Grosseto 6

IT1090 Umbria 6

IT1091 Perugia 5

IT1092 Terni 6

IT1093 Marche 4

IT1094 Pesaro e Urbino 3

IT1095 Ancona 3

IT1096 Macerata 3

IT1097 Ascoli Piceno 3

IT1098 Fermo 6

IT1099 Lazio 1

IT1100 Viterbo 6

IT1101 Rieti 6

IT1102 Roma 1

IT1103 Latina 3

IT1104 Frosinone 3

IT1000 Abruzzo 4

IT1001 L'Aquila 6

IT1002 Teramo 3

IT1003 Pescara 3

IT1004 Chieti 3

IT1005 Molise 6

IT1006 Isernia 6

IT1007 Campobasso 6

IT1008 Campania 3

IT1009 Caserta 3

IT1010 Benevento 3

IT1011 Napoli 1

IT1012 Avellino 3

IT1013 Salerno 2

IT1014 Puglia 4

IT1015 Taranto 3

IT1016 Brindisi 3

IT1017 Lecce 3

IT1018 Foggia 6

IT1019 Bari 2

IT1020 Barletta-Andria-T 6

IT1021 Basilicata 6

IT1022 Potenza 6

IT1023 Matera 6

IT1024 Calabria 4

IT1025 Cosenza 3

IT1026 Crotone 6

IT1027 Catanzaro 3

IT1028 Vibo Valentia 3

IT1029 Reggio di Calab 3

IT1031 Sicilia 3

IT1032 Trapani 3

IT1033 Palermo 2

IT1034 Messina 3

IT1035 Agrigento 3

IT1036 Caltanissetta 3

IT1037 Enna 6

IT1038 Catania 2

IT1039 Ragusa 3

IT1040 Siracusa 3

IT1041 Sardegna 5

IT1042 Sassari 6

IT1043 Nuoro 6

IT1044 Cagliari 2

IT1045 Oristano 6

IT1046 Olbia-Tempio 6

IT1047 Ogliastra 6

IT1048 Medio Campida 6

IT1049 Carbonia-Iglesia 6

N2_03 Italy Territory

IT970 Piemonte 2

IT971 Torino 1

IT972 Vercelli 6

IT973 Biella 3

IT974 Verbano-Cusio- 6

IT975 Novara 3

IT976 Cuneo 6

IT977 Asti 3

IT978 Alessandria 3

IT979 Valle d'Aosta/Va 6

IT980 Valle d'Aosta/Va 6

IT981 Liguria 4

IT982 Imperia 3

IT983 Savona 3

IT984 Genova 1

IT985 La Spezia 2

IT986 Lombardia 1

IT987 Varese 3

IT988 Como 2

IT989 Lecco 3

IT990 Sondrio 6

IT991 Bergamo 3

IT992 Brescia 2

IT993 Pavia 3

IT994 Lodi 3

IT995 Cremona 3

IT996 Mantova 3

IT997 Milano 1

IT998 Monza e della B 3

IT1051 Provincia Auton 6

IT1052 Bolzano-Bozen 6

IT1053 Provincia Auton 5

IT1054 Trento 5

IT1055 Veneto 3

IT1056 Verona 2

IT1057 Vicenza 3

IT1058 Belluno 6

IT1059 Treviso 3

IT1060 Venezia 2

IT1061 Padova 2

IT1062 Rovigo 3

IT1063 Friuli-Venezia G 4

IT1064 Pordenone 3

IT1065 Udine 5

IT1066 Gorizia 3

IT1067 Trieste 2

IT1068 Emilia-Romagna 3

IT1069 Piacenza 3

IT1070 Parma 3

IT1071 Reggio nell'Emi 3

IT1072 Modena 3

IT1073 Bologna 1

IT1074 Ferrara 3

IT1075 Ravenna 3

IT1076 Forlì-Cesena 2

IT1077 Rimini 6

73 basic indicators wereselected to represent the 4 determinants of TC(data, metadata, quantitative values)


3A survey to policy makers, stakeholders, practitioners, civilservantes permitted to better understand the initial knowledge of TC in Italy (ANNEX)


Smart Growth Innovation Vulnerability (IV)

Innovation Status Quo (ISQ) Digital Society (DS) Formazione (F)

Virtual shareholder (VSh)

Virtual Stakeholders (VSt)

Structure for the creation of knowledge

Capitale Umano (CU)

Formazione del Capitale Umano

(FCU)

R&D infrastructures (RDI)

Livello di sviluppo delle telecomunicazioni (LST)

Pene

trazio

ne de

lla

band

a ultra

larga

(BUL

)

Pene

trazio

ne de

lla

band

a ultra

larg

a (BU

L)

PA U

tilizz

ano i

ntern

et (P

AI)

Stru

tture

Edu

cazio

ne

alla c

reaz

ione d

i co

nosc

enza

(PL)

Indice

di di

pend

enza

inn

ovati

va (I

DI)

Popo

lazion

e con

for

mazio

ne te

rziar

ia (P

ET)

Popu

lation

in lif

e lon

g lea

rning

(PLL

)

R&D

Infra

struc

tures

(R

DI)

Livell

o di p

enetr

azion

e de

lla ba

nda l

arga

nella

PA

(BLP

A)

BUL II PAI

PL

IDI

PET

PLL

RDI

BLPA

Inclusive Growth

Variabili strutturali di inclusione (VSI) Capacità formativa inclusiva (CFI)

Capacità di inclusione sociale (CSI) Capacità istituzioni (CI) RES+IS=RESIS

Attitude to social welfare

(ATS)

Variabili economiche

Qualità della vita (QV) Capacità del sistema formativo

Rischio di esclusione sociale (RES)

Inclusione straniera (IS)

Fiducia nella governance

SALBD Tempo libero

Inclusione del sistema

formativo ISF

Esclusione del

sistema formativo

ESF

Rischio di

povertà

Rischio di esclusione giovanile (REG)

LPP+AmReg

PIL+DisRed Cons+IPzC Benessere demografico StlnStud OcStr+TxImSt LPP

Prod

otto I

ntern

o Lor

do pr

o cap

ite S

tanda

rd

Poter

e di a

cquis

to (P

ILpp S

PA)

Dise

guale

distr

ibuzio

ne de

l redd

ito re

giona

le (D

isRed

)

Cons

umo p

ro ca

pite (

Cons

)

Indice

dei p

rezz

i al c

onsu

mo /IP

zC)

Tass

o di fe

cond

ità to

tale (

TFT)

Sper

anza

di vi

ta >6

5 (Sp

Vit)

Tass

o di o

sped

alizz

azion

e (SA

L)

Oppo

rtunit

à cult

urali

(OpC

u)

Tass

o di tu

ristic

ità (T

xTUR

)

Popo

lazion

e con

laur

ea tr

ienna

le /

Popo

lazion

e tota

le (P

TE)

Stud

enti i

n ing

ress

o (St

uln)

Stud

enti i

n usc

ita (S

tuUsc

)

Abba

ndon

o sco

lastic

o (Ab

bSc)

NEET

Livell

o di o

ccup

azion

e

Risc

hio di

pove

rtà as

solut

a (Ri

skPo

cAs)

Tass

o di o

ccup

azion

e giov

anile

Risc

hio di

esclu

sione

mino

ri (Ri

skMi

n)

Resid

enti s

tranie

ri (RS

)

Occu

pati s

tranie

ri (Oc

Str)

Tass

o di im

pren

ditor

i stra

nieri (

TxIm

St)

Occu

pazio

ne fe

mmini

le (P

arOp

)

Asili

nido

Parte

cipaz

ioni a

lle am

minis

trazio

ni re

giona

li (A

mReg

)

Parte

cipaz

ione p

ubbli

ca al

la po

litica

na

ziona

le (P

pEn)

Parte

cipaz

ione a

lle el

ezion

i eur

opee

(PeE

e)

Tass

o di c

oope

razio

ne tr

ansfr

ontal

iera e

tra

nsna

ziona

le (C

OOP)

PILp

p SP

A

DisR

ed

Cons

IPzC

TFT

SpVi

t

SAL

OpCu

TxTU

R

PTE

Stuln

StuU

sc

AbbS

c

NEET

Occ

Risk

PovA

s Oc

cG

Risk

Min

RS

OcSt

r

TxIm

St

ParO

p

AN

AmRe

g

PpEn

PeEe

CfUe

Risorse e Fondi

Vulnerabilità (Vuln) Uso dei Fondi (UF)

Livello di intervento in innovazione e conoscenza (InCon) Livello di intervento in sostenibilità (Sost)

Innovazione competitiva (IC) Capitale umano (CU) Competitivitrà

sostenibile (CS) Qualità della vita (QV) Uso dei fondi di coesione

Livello di cooperazione

R&S Aiuto alla imprese

Formazione professionale Occupazione Sostenibilità

allo sviluppo Diritto alla

mobilità Sport e

tempo libero Diritti sociali Fondi di coesione Cooperazione

Spes

a in r

icerca

e Sv

ilupp

o

Spes

a per

svilu

ppo

econ

omico

e co

mpeti

tività

Spes

a per

occu

pazio

ne

RF_S

pesa

per f

orma

zione

pr

ofess

ionale

Spes

a in s

vilup

po

soste

nibile

Spes

a in t

rasp

orti e

diritt

o all

a mob

ilità

Spes

a in p

olitic

he gi

ovan

ili,

spor

t e te

mpo l

ibero

Spes

a per

diritt

i soc

iali,

politi

che s

ocial

i e fa

migli

a

Fond

i di c

oesio

ne ut

ilizza

ti in

prog

etti

Tass

o di c

oope

razio

ne

trans

fronta

liera

e tra

nsna

ziona

le (C

OOP)

RF_S

pR&

S

RF_S

pSv

Ec

RF_S

pOc

RF_S

pFo

P

RF_S

pSS

RF_T

ra

RF_S

pG

RF_S

pSoc

RF_F

CP

RF_C

OOP

4Ex ante place evidence: at 2018 and comparation with 2011

Smart: Milan and some Lombardia provinces decline in significance, as well as Veneto ones, Po Valley, and Bologna and Florence. South shows resilience!

Sustainability: Veneto provinces (Noth-East), Turin, Florence, Rome and Catania loose positions, as well assismic/risk areas

Funds: Here the change issignificant! Milan and Po Valley, Bologna and its Region and sismic areas decline in significance; South Metropolitancities/areas rise! Sicily loosepositions

General Framework until the end of the PRIN II year: the TIA of reached TC cannot be deemed sufficient in order to support the EU pre-conditionality required to enter in post 2020


5Italy is appelling to N+3In January 2019:- 51 OP co-financed by ERDF and ESF 2014-2020

have submitted (31/12/18) the certification ofexpenditure incurred and the correspondingapplication for reimbursement to the EuropeanCommission

- 3/51 NOP are not meeting TC and expendituretargets:•Research and Innovation•Inclusion•Governance•Some regional ROP

Payments October 2018

PRIN Policy remarksTC helps to satisfy policy needsIntroducing new conceptualterms, it is able to create new balanced and «family» solutionsby europeanisation of planning practice

4/16/201936

6

PRIN is Bridging the gapThis means to find the way to participate:- in implementing the next Territorial Agenda - in applying Urban Agenda The measure of the TC progress is important to make policy/decision institutions responsible in strategic integrated choices of investment for the future and for discussing the proposed architecture of the new Cohesion Policy in the Southern macro-region.This could really be a political and economic progress for Italy

Remove obstacles and barriers


low capability in an efficient spending of Regional Operational Programs (ROPs)

difficulty in the policy elaboration process to catch real needs

difficulty in the selection of appropriate beneficiaries of local investments

limited involvement of territorial stakeholders and citizens

use of unsuitable (no place-based) expenditure monitoring system

lack of well suited territorial assessment tools and other EU instruments

transform Italian localisms into European typologies of geographical diversity towards Green Economy is the PRIN final ambitious (III year) developing a Geography of Cohesion useful to policy/decision makers, stakeholders, practioners, civil servantes, citizens

Special thanks to Maria, Angela and MicheleMaria Prezioso PRIN Principal Investigator (and Unit 1), University of Rome ”Tor Vergata”

www.princoesione.uniroma2.it

Prin 2015 – Rome, 11-12 April 2019

international conference territorial impact assessment of ... · new ‘kid on the block’...

Documents