international school of subnuclear physics erice, 30 aug - 6 sept 2006
DESCRIPTION
Measurement of the CKM angle g with a D 0 Dalitz analysis of the B ± →D (*) K ± decays at BaBar . Nicola Neri INFN Pisa. International School of Subnuclear Physics Erice, 30 Aug - 6 Sept 2006. ( r , h ). a. *. *. *. V td V tb. |V cd V cb |. V ud V ub. *. |V cd V cb |. g. b. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Measurement of the CKM angle with a D0 Dalitz analysis of the
B±→D(*)K± decays at BaBar
International School of Subnuclear PhysicsErice, 30 Aug - 6 Sept 2006
Nicola NeriINFN Pisa
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
2
CKM matrix and Unitarity Triangle
0*** tbtdcbcdubud VVVVVV
CP violation is proportional to the triangle area
,0argcbcd
ubud
VVVVCP violation
Standard Model fits predicts •(64±5 )˚ UTFit - Bayesian•(60±5 )˚CKMFit - Frequentist
•Test SM prediction with tree-level processes
(0,0) (1,0)
(,)
Vtd Vtb*
|Vcd Vcb|*|Vcd Vcb|*
Vud Vub*
tbtstd
cbcscd
ubusud
VVVVVVVVV
VUnitarity of
quark mixing matrix
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
3
ubV
*csVcbV
*usV
bc transition bu transition
A(B-D0 K-) = AB A(B-D0 K-) = ABrB e i(B-)
Gronau, Wyler, Phys. Lett. B265,172 (1991)
D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, A. SoniPhys.Rev. D63 (2001) 036005
A. Giri, Y. Grossman, A. Soffer, J. ZupanPhys.Rev. D68 (2003) 054018
If same final state interference measurement
CKM elements + color suppression
strong phasein B decay
Towards
Critical parameter)()(
sucbAscubArB
f
f
f = KS (Dalitz Analysis)f = CP (GLW)f = DCSD (ADS)
Theoretically and experimentally difficult to determine.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
4
Three-body D decays: Dalitz plot A point of in a three-body decay phase-space can be determined
with two independent kinematical variables. A possible choice is to represent the state in the Dalitz plot
230
1132
20
112 , pKpspKps ss
),( 1312 ss
kinematical Mandelstam variables:
The A(D0 →Ks) amplitude can be written as AD(s12, s13).
(mKS+m2
(MD0-m)2
(mKS+m2
(MD0-m)2
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
5
0D0D
A(B- ) = AD(s12, s13) +rB ei(-+B) AD(s13, s12)
A(B+ ) = AD (s13, s12) +rB ei(+B AD((s12, s13)
CP
|A(B- )|2 =| AD(s12, s13) |2 + rB2 | AD(s13, s12) |2 +
+2rBRe[AD(s12, s13) AD(s13, s12)* ei(-+B)]
AD(s12, s13): fitted on
If rB is large, good precision on
D0 3-body decay Dalitz distribution |AD(s12, s13) |2 (*)
from the Interference term
The method suffers of a two-fold ambiguity BB ,,
Using AD(s12, s13) in B decay amplitude
Assuming CP is conserved in D decays
ccee 00SKD 0* DD with from
s13 (GeV2)
230
12
132
20
12
12 ,
pKpmspKpms ss(*) Def.
s13 (GeV2)
s 12 (G
eV2 )
s 12 (G
eV2 )
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
6
Model Dependent Breit-Wigner description of 2-body amplitudes Three-body D0 decays proceed mostly via 2-body decays (1 resonance + 1
particle) The D0 amplitude AD can be fit to a sum of Breit-Wigner functions plus a
constant term, see E.M. Aitala et. al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 770 (2001) For systematic error evaluation, use K-Matrix formalism to overcome the
main limitation of the BW model to parameterize large and overlapping S-wave resonances.
),(),( 1312013120
ssAeaeassA ri
rr
iD
r
rJrr BWMssA ),( 1312
)(1)(
2ijrrrij
ijr
simMssBW
= angular dependence of the amplitude
depends on the spin J of the resonance r
Relativistic Breit-Wigner with mass dependent width r
where sij=[s12,s13,s23] depending on the resonance Ks-,Ks+,+-. mr is the mass of the resonance
JrM
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
7
The BaBar Isobar model
Good fit in DCS K*(892) region.
BaBar Data with BaBar isobar model fit over imposed.Fit Fraction=1.20
K
KDCS
390K sig events
97.7% purity
00SKD
0* DD
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
8
The BaBar Isobar Model
Mass and widths are fixed to the PDG values. Except for K*(1430), use E791 values and for , `, fit from data.
BaBar model 16 resonances + 1 constant term (Non-resonant).
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
9
Signal events and DATA sample– DATA at (4S) peak 10.580 GeV 316.3 fb-1 (347 M BB
events)– DATA below peak 23.3 fb-1
B
+e-e (4S)
B
X
-K
0SK
0D
Ks
0
0 )(cos
DKsKs
DKsKsKs
xxp
xxp
=1 for signal events
D0 0 ,D0
K-B-
+ -
Ks + -
D*0D0 B- K-
+ -
Ks + -
9.1 GeV 3.0 GeVrate = L·(bb) ~ 1.2·1034cm-2s-1 ·1.1 nb ≳ 13 BB evt/sec
(4S)50% B0B0
50% B+B-
(4S)
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
10
Yields on DATA
D0K D*0K D*0 D0 D*0K D*0 D0
BD0K 39823 signal events ~60% purity mES>5.272 GeV/c2
BD*0K D*0 D0 9713 signal events ~80% purity
BD*0K D*0 D0 9312 signal events ~50% purity
347 million of BB pairs at (4S)
Signal D BB qq
background is >5 times the bkg contribution in each mode. D contribution is negligible after all the selection criteria applied in signal region unless for [D0]K. The error on the Dcontribution is large and can be explained as a statistical fluctuation (accounted for in systematic error)
qq BB
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
11
Dalitz distributions
B- B+
DK D*K (D00)K
D*K (D0)K
B- B+
B- B+ Dalitz plot distribution for signal events after all the selection criteria applied.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
12
CP parameters extractionFit for different CP parameters: cartesian coordinates are preferred base. Errors are gaussian and pulls are well behaving. x= Re[rBexpi(]= rBcos() , y= Im[rBexpi(= rBsin()
The statistical error dominates the measurement.
x*-=rBcos()y*-=rBsin() x*+=rBcos()y*+=rBsin()
CP parameter Resultx-=rBcos()y-=rBsin() x+=rBcos()y+=rBsin()
CP parameter Result
Dalitz model error. Account for phenomenological D amplitude parameterization uncertainty
PDF shapes , Dalitz plot efficiency, qq Dalitz shape Charge correlation of (D0,K) in qq
Main systematics
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
13
Cartesian coordinate results
B+
B-
d
D0K
Direct CPV
B+
B-
D*0K
Direct CP violation d=2 rb(*)|sin|
d
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
14
Experimental systematic errors
Experimental systematics Dalitz model systematics≳Statistical error >>
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
15
Frequentist interpretation of the results
Stat Syst Dalitz
2
1
D0K D*0K
is to be understood in term of 1D proj of a L in 5D.
1 (2) excursion
rB r*B
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
16
Considerations on the results
2
B+
B-
x
y
rB
x≈y≈rb·
rb
rb
() ≈ x/rb
Experimentally we can improve the measurement of the CPcartesian coordinates but the improvement on error of depends on the true value of the rb parameter. Similar behavior for statistical and systematic error.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
17
Conclusions and perspectives• We demonstrated that the measurement of is possible and compatible with SM predictions.•Dalitz method gives the best sensitivity to but…more statisticsis crucial.•If rB≥0.1 we will know the value ≤15% precision with 1 ab-1.
Near Future=73±29 ([15,136]@95%CL) =-107±29 ([-165,-44]@95%CL)
Toy MCrb=0.1 assumed
Dalitz model error projection
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
19
Dalitz model systematics S-wave:
Use K-matrix S-wave model instead of the nominal BW model P-wave:
Change (770) parameters according to PDG Replace Gounaris-Sakurai by regular BW
and K D-wave Zemach Tensor as the Spin Factor for f2(1270) and K*2(1430) BW
K S-wave: Allow K*0(1430) mass and width to be determined from the fit Use LASS parameterization with LASS parameters
K P-wave: Use BJ/psi Ks + as control sample for K*(892) parameters Allow K*(892) mass and width to be determined from the fit
Blatt-Weiskopf penetration factors Running width: consider a fixed value Remove K2*(1430), K*(1680), K*(1410), (1450)
This is a more realistic and detailed estimate of the model systematics !
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
20
Bias on x-, x+ for alternative Dalitz models
Residual for the x-, x+ coordinates wrt the nominal CP fit.
Yellow band is the nominal fit statistical error (x100 Run1-5 statistics)
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
21
Bias on y-, y+ for alternative Dalitz models
Residual for the y-, y+ coordinates wrt the nominal CP fit.
Yellow band is the nominal fit statistical error (x100 Run1-5 statistics)
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
22
Background parameterization: Dalitz shape for background events
● BB and continuum events are divided in real D0 and fake D0. The real D0 fraction is evaluated on qq and BB Monte Carlo counting:
● cross-check on DATA using the mES<5.272 GeV sidebands and fitting the D0 mass.
● For the bkg real D0 : D0 Dalitz signal shape For the bkg fake D0 (combinatorial) 2D symmetric 3rd order polynomial asymmetric
function :• cross-check on DATA using the mES<5.272 GeV and D0 mass sidebands
.BB combinatorics - MC .qq combinatorics – MC
fit function fit function
Asymmetric Asymmetric
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
23
Background parameterization: fraction of true D0
● The real D0 fraction is evaluated directly on DATA using the mES<5.272 GeV sidebands and fitting the D0 mass distribution. The signal is a Gaussian with fixed MeV/c2 (MC value) and MeV/c2 (PDG value).
. DATA (On-Res)
On Monte Carlo we find the fraction for true D0 to be:
MC continuum evt
MC BB events
we use this error for conservative systematic error evaluation
0.2218 0.00970.0255 0.00760.1588 0.0062
Cont
BB
Bkg
RRR
MC BB + qq weighted evt
0.254 0.035dataR
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
24
Background characterization: true D0 and flavor-charge correlation
cc
D0=KS
D0
K- + other particles
e+ e-
estimated on Monte Carlo events 15.064.0 , 018.0164.0
###
00
0
RSBB
RSCont
RS
RRKDBKDB
KDBR
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
25
Final results •We have measured the cartesian CP fit parameters for DK (x±,y±) and D*K (x*± ,y*±)using 316 fb-1 BaBar data:
D0 amplitude model uncertainty Experimental systematicsStatistical error
•This measurement supersedes the previous one on 208 fb-1 with significant improvements in the method and smaller errors on the cartesian CP parameters.•Using a Frequentist approach we have extracted the values of the CP parameters:
is to be understood in term of 1D proj of a L in 5D.
x*-=rBcos()y*-=rBsin() x*+=rBcos()y*+=rBsin()
CP parameter Resultx-=rBcos()y-=rBsin() x+=rBcos()y+=rBsin()
CP parameter Result
Stat Syst Dalitz
1 (2) excursion
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
26
CP Violation in the Standard Model CP symmetry can be violated in any field theory with at least one
CP-odd phase in the Lagrangian This condition is satisfied in the Standard Model through the three-
generation Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) quark-mixing matrix
b
u
W
ubV bt
sc
du
CP-violating phase
23.0
Wolfenstein parameterization: corresponds to a
particular choice of the quark-phase convention
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
27
Unitarity triangle
0*** tbtdcbcdubud VVVVVV(0,0) (1,0)
Vtd Vtb*
|Vcd Vcb|*
CP violation is proportional to the area
,0argcbcd
ubud
VVVV
CP violation
|Vcd Vcb|*
Vud Vub*
()
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
28
CP violation in decay or direct CP violation
BHfA || BHfA ||
For example A=A1+A2: two amplitudes with a relative CP violating phase (CP-odd) and a CP conserving phase (CP-even)
A 2 2
f fA
B B CP violation
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
29
BaBar Detector
DIRC PID)144 quartz bars
11000 PMs
1.5T solenoid
EMC6580 CsI(Tl) crystals
Drift Chamber40 stereo layers
Instrumented Flux Returniron / RPCs/LSTs (muon / neutral hadrons)
Silicon Vertex Tracker5 layers, double-sided sensors
e+ (3.1GeV)
e (9.0 GeV)
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
30
Dalitz: BaBar vs Belle Results HFAGExperiment Mode γ/φ3 (°) δB (°) rB
DK– D→KSπ+π– 53± +15
–18 ± 3 ± 9 146 ± 19 ± 3 ± 23 0.16 ± 0.05 ± 0.01 ± 0.05
Belle‘06 N(BB)=392M
D*K– D*→Dπ0 D→KSπ+π– 53 ± +15
–18 ± 3 ± 9 302 ± 35 ± 6 ± 23 0.18 +0.11–0.10 ± 0.01 ± 0.05
DK– D→KSπ+π– 92 ± 41 ± 10 ± 13 118 ±64 ±21 ±28 <0.142
D*K– D*→D(π0,γ) D→KSπ+π– 92 ± 41 ± 10 ± 13 298 ±59 ±16 ±13 <0.206
BABAR'06 N(BB)=347M
BaBar measurement is very important since it stresses one more time the difficulty to measure in a regime where the uncertainty on rb is quite large.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
31
BaBar vs Belle experimental results
Belle’06 - N(BB)=386M
BABAR'06 - N(BB)=347M
Experimental measurement of the CP parameters x,y is more precise wrt Belle evenwith slightly smaller statistics. Different error on is due to Belle larger central values.
x*-=rBcos()y*-=rBsin() x*+=rBcos()y*+=rBsin()
CP parameter Resultx-=rBcos()y-=rBsin() x+=rBcos()y+=rBsin()
CP parameter Result
x*-=rBcos()y*-=rBsin() x*+=rBcos()y*+=rBsin()
CP parameter Result
x-=rBcos()y-=rBsin() x+=rBcos(y+=rBsin()
CP parameter Result−0.13 +0.17
−0.15 ± 0.02
−0.34 +0.17−0.16 ± 0.03
0.03 ± 0.12 ± 0.01
0.01 ± 0.14 ± 0.01
0.03 +0.07−0.08 ± 0.01
0.17 +0.09−0.12 ± 0.02
−0.14 ± 0.07 ± 0.02
−0.09 ± 0.09 ± 0.01
give
n on
rb
,
give
n on
rb
,
D0 amplitude model uncertainty Experimental systematicsStatistical error
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
32
Outline
Theoretical framework D0 decay amplitude parameterization Selection of the D(*)K events CP parameters from the D0 Dalitz distribution Systematic errors Extraction of Conclusions
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
33
Selection criteria for B±D(*)K± decay modesD0K D*0K (D00) D*0K (D0)
|cos T| <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 |mass(D0)-PDG| <12MeV <12MeV <12MeV |mass(Ks)-PDG| <9MeV <9MeV <9MeV E ----- >30 MeV >100MeV |mass(0)-PDG| ----- <15MeV ----- Kaon Tight Selector Yes Yes Yes |M-PDG| ----- <2.5MeV <10.0MeV cos Ks >0.99 >0.99 >0.99 |E | <30MeV <30MeV <30MeV---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- efficiency 15% 7% 9% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- signal events 398±23 97±13 93±12
cos Ks suppress fake Ks |cos T| suppress jet-like events
Kaon Tight Selector (LH) and |E|<30 MeV suppress D(*) events
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
34
Likelihood for Dalitz CP fit
BBCont,R
fSig,Dh,Cont,BB from data (extended likelihood yields)
A(B-) = |AD(s12,s13) +rBei(-BAD(s13,s12) |2
0
0 0Cont,BB,WrongSig
## #
RS B D KRB D K B D K
True D0 fraction from MC and data (mES sidebands) Charge-flavor correlation
from MC
D0,D0
|AD(s12,s13)|2 |AD(s13,s12)|2
From MC and D0 sideband data
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
35
(D0)K – (D00)K cross-feed From Monte Carlo simulation the cross-feed between the samples is
due to events of (D00)K where we loose a soft and we reconstruct it as a (D0)K.
Since the cross-feed goes in one direction (D00)K (D0)K, it is correct to assign common events to the (D00)K signal sample.
After all the cuts and after this correction applied we expect <5% of signal (D0)K from cross-feed.
A systematic effect to the cross-feed has been assigned adding a signal component according to the (D00)K Dalitz PDF and performing the CP fit.
The systematic bias of the fit with and without (D00)K has been quoted as systematic error.
Negligible wrt the other systematic error sources.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
36
Dalitz model systematic error: K*(1430) parameters
BaBar Isobar model [float] for K*0(1430): Mass =1.495 +/- 0.01 GeVWidth = 183 +/- 9 MeV
E791 Isobar model for K*0(1430): Mass =1.459+/-0.007 GeVWidth = 175 +/- 12 MeV
The Isobar model, the fit prefer small value of K*(1430), both seen in E791 and BaBar, although PDG list the width 294 MeV
Current BaBar model for K*0(1430): Mass =1.412 +/- 0.006 GeVWidth = 294 +/- 23 MeV
PDG(from LASS)
Mass and width are not unique parameters, depend on the parameterization and Non-Resonant model
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
37
K*(892) and K*(1430) with new parameters
Perfect!
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
38
Zemach Tensor vs Helicity model
Monte Carlo simulation using f2(1270)
In Dsthe non-resonant term is much smaller (5%) in Zemach Tensor while the non-resonant term is (25%) if Helicity model is used
MC MCData
Data Ds
D wave systematics
Affects seriously on spin 2
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
39
Dalitz model systematic error: K*(892) parameters In PDG those measurements are from 1970’s. Very low statistics ~5000 events we have ~200000 K*(892) eventsIf we allow mass and width to float, we get the width 46 +/- 0.5 MeV, mass 893 +/- 0.2 MeV
Partial wave analysis of BJ/psi K decay (BaBar) can use as control sample
Mass=892.9+/-2.5 MeV Width=46.6 +/-4.7 MeV
Their values are consistent with our floatedvalues
No S-wave!Very clean measurement
Consider as systematics compared with PDG
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
40
Procedure for Dalitz model systematics
Generate a high statistics toy MC (x100 data statistics) experiment using nominal (BW) model.
The experiment is fitted using the nominal and each alternative model.
Produce experiment-by-experiment differences for all (x,y) parameters for each alternative Dalitz model.
For each CP coordinates, consider the squared sum of the residuals over all the alternative models as the systematic error.
Since the model error increases with the value of rb we conservatively quote a model error corresponding to ~rb+1valuethat we fit on data.
This is a quite conservative estimate of the systematics and we believe it is fair to consider the covariance matrix among the CP parameters to be diagonal.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
41
Sensitivity to points : weight = 1
weight = 2
2
ln( )d Ld
22
2
1( ) ~ln( )d L
d
D0 Ks
DCS D0 K0*(1430)+-
CA D0 K*(892)- +
DCS D0 K*(892)+-
s12 (GeV2)
s
13
(GeV
2 )
Strong phase variation improves the sensitivity to . Isobar model formalism reduces discrete ambiguities on the value of to a two-fold ambiguity.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
42
Reconstruction of exclusive B±D(*)K± decays
D0 0 ,D0 K-B-
+-
Ks + -
B
+e-e
Y(4S)
B
X
-K
0SK
0D
Ks
0
0 )(cos
DKsKs
DKsKsKs
xxp
xxp
D*0D0
=1 for signal events
B- K-
+-
Ks + -
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
43
Background characterization: relative fraction of signal and bkg samples
D0K D*0K - D*0 D0 D*0K - D*0 D0
Signal D BB qq
● Continuum events are the largest bkg in the analysis.We apply a cut |cos(T)|<0.8 and we use fisher PDF for the continuum bkg
suppression. Fisher = F [LegendreP0,LegendreP2,|cos T|,|cos *|]● The Fisher PDF helps to evaluate the relative fraction of BB and continuum
events directly from DATA.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
44
Efficiency Map for D*→D0
SvOutPlaceObjectRed = perfectly flat efficiency Blu = 3rd order polynomial fit
Efficiency is almost flatin the Dalitz plot. The fitwithout eff map givesvery similar fit results.
Purity 97.7%
We use ~200K D* MC sample D0 Phase Space to compute the efficiency map .
2D 3rd order polynomial function usedfor the efficiency map.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
45
Isobar model formalismAs an example a D0 three-body decay D0 ABC decaying through an r=[AB] resonance
D0 three-body amplitude
•We fit for a0 ,ar amplitude values and the relative phase 0 , r among resonances, constant over the Dalitz plot.
can be fitted from DATA using a D0 flavor tagged sample from events selecting with ccee 00
SKD 0* DD
In the amplitude we include FD, Fr the vertex factors of the D and the resonance r respectively.H.Pilkuhn, The interactions of hadrons, Amsterdam: North-Holland (1967)
),(),( 1312013120
ssAeaeassA rri
rr
iD
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
46
Efficiency Map for B->DK (*)
● Because of the different momentum range we use a different parametrization respect to the D* sample.We use ~1M B->D(*)K signal MC sample with Phase Space D0 decay to compute the efficiency mapping.
● Fit for 2D 3rd order polynomial function to parametrize the efficiency mapping:
Efficiency is rather flatin the Dalitz plot. CP Fit without eff map to quote the systematic erroron CP parameters
)()()(),( 2131213
212
313
31231312
213
21221212101312 ssssssessssesseess
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
47
K-Matrix formalism for S-wave1. K-Matrix formalism overcomes the main limitation of the BW model to
parameterize large and overlapping S-wave resonances. Avoid the introduction of not established ´ scalar resonances.
2. By construction unitarity is satisfied
K-matrix D0 three-body amplitude
),( ),( 13120 ,0
2311312 ssAeasFssA rri
spinkspinrrD
SS†=1 S=1+2iT T=(1-iK·)-1K where S is the scattering operator
T is the transition operatoris the phase space matrix
j
23-11j2323231 s si-I jssF PρK F1 = S-wave amplitude
Pj(s) = initial production vector
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
48
The CLEO model
CLEO model 10 resonances + 1 Non Resonant term.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
49
The CLEO modelWith >10x more data than CLEO, we find that the model with 10 resonances is insufficient to describe the data.
BaBar Data refitted using CLEO model.
CLEO model 10 resonances + 1 Non Resonant term.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
50
The BELLE modelBelle model 15 resonances + 1 Non Resonant term. Added DCS K*0,2(1430), K*(1680) and 1 , 2 respect to the CLEO Model. With more statistics you “see” a more detailedstructure.
Added
Added
Added
AddedAdded
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
51
The BELLE model
Not very good fit for DCS K*(892) region.
BELLE Data with BELLE model fitoverimposed.DCS region is quite
important for the sensitivity. See plotin the next pages.
Belle model 15 resonances + 1 Non Resonant term. Added DCS K*0,2(1430), K*(1680) and 1 , 2 respect to the CLEO Model.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
52
The BaBar Model
BaBar model does not include the DCS K*(1680) and DCS K*(1410) because the number of events expected is very small.
DCS K*(1680)K*(1680)
Moreover the K*(1680) and the DCS K*(1680) overlap in the same Dalitz region: the fit was returning same amplitude for CA and DCS!
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
53
The BaBar model
2 fit evaluation of goodness of fit: 1.27/dof(3054).CLEO model is 2.2/dof(3054)Belle model is 1.88/dof(1130)
Total fit fraction: 125.0% CLEO model is 120%Belle model is 137%
The 2 is still not optimal but much better respect to all Dalitz fit published so far.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
54
The BaBar K-matrix modelBaBar Data with BaBar K-matrix model fit over imposed.Fit Fraction=1.11
K
KDCS
opens KK channel
390K sig events
97.7% purity
00SKD
0* DD
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
55
K-Matrix parameterization according to Anisovich, Sarantev
2/
0.10.1 223
023
0
023
0
23223
msssss
sss
fsm
ggs A
A
Ascatt
scattscatt
ijr
jiij
K
scatt
scattprodj
jj ss
sf
sm
g
023
01
232
0.1s
P
igwhere is the coupling constant of the K-matrix pole mto the ith channel 1= 2=KK
3=multi-meson 4= 5= ´.
Adler zero term to accommodate singularities
scattscattij sf 0 , slow varying parameter of the K-matrix element. 1 if 0 if scatt
ij
Pj(s) = initial production vector
I.J.R. Aitchison, Nucl. Phys. A189, 417 (1972)
V.V. Anisovitch, A.V Sarantev Eur. Phys. Jour. A16, 229 (2003)
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
56
The BaBar K-Matrix Model
BaBar K-Matrix model 9 resonances + S-wave term. Total fit fraction is 1.11.
S-wave term
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
57
Extract as much as possible information from data
●Step 1: selection PDF shapes and yieldsFit as many as possible component yields and discriminating variables (PDF) shapes from simultaneous fit to DK and D data
Fix the remaining to MC estimates Selection PDFs: mES, Fisher
●Step 2: Dalitz CP fit to extract CP parameters from the D0 Dalitz
distribution Fix shape PDF parameters obtained in step 1 and perform
Dalitz CP fit alone with yields re-floated Impact of fixing shape PDFs on CP violation parameters is small (systematic error taken into account)
Overview of Dalitz CP fit strategy
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
58
The frequentist method Frequentist (classical) method determines CL regions where the probability
that the region will contain the true point is Determine PDF of fitted parameters as a function of the true parameters:
In principle, fitted-true parameter mapping requires multi-dimensional scan of the experimental (full) likelihood:
Prohibitive amount of CPU, limited precision (granularity of the scan).
Make optimal choice of fitted parameters and try analytical construction for the PDF. Gaussian PDF are easy to integrate!
Cartesian coordinates (x,y) x= Re[rBexpi(]= rBcos() , y= Im[rBexpi(= rBsin()
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
59
The Frequentist PDFSingle channel (D0K o D*0K) Measured parameters (4D): z+=(x+, y+), z-=(x-, y-)Truth parameters (3D): pt=(rB,
D0K-D*0K combination Measured parameters (8D): z+, z-, z*+, z*-
Truth parameters (5D): pt=(rB, r*B, *)
Easy to include systematic error by replacing stat→ tot
G2(z;x,y,x,y,r) is a 2D Gaussianwith mean (x,y) and sigma (x,y)
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
60
Confidence Regions
Integration domain D
●(pt): calculated analytically, PDF is product of gaussians.●We calculate 3D (5D) joint probability corresponding to 1 and 2CL for a 3D (5D) gaussian distribution.●Make 1D projections to quote 1 and 2 regions for rb,rb*,*
CL=1-(pt)
P(data|pt)
Integral
.data
D
.zPt
Example in 1D
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
61
Cartesian coordinates: toy MC
x-
y-
x+
y+ Linear correspondence and errors are well behaving.
Fitted parameters vs Generated parameters.
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
62
Confidence Regions (CR):D0K-D*0K combination
Integration domain D (CR)
CL=1-(pt)
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
63
D0K-D*0K confidence intervalsSingle channel (D0K o D*0K)
D0K-D*0K combination
Central values are the mean of CL the interval
September 1st 2006 Erice
Nicola Neri - International School of Subnuclear Physics
64
BD*K decays help in constraining
0*)*(*0**~ DerDD iB
)(
)(0*
0**
KDBA
KDBArB
2
0(*)0(*)0(*) DD
DCP
As pointed out in Phys.Rev.D70 091503 (2004) for the BD*K decay we have:
From the momentum parity conservation in the D* decay:
1)γCP(1)πCP( 0
DD
DD
*
0*
The effective strong phase shift helps in the determination of
cos21 220*BB rraKDDBBR
cos21 22*BB rraKDDBBR
Opposite CP
eigenstate