interstate tolling: financing reconstruction and shifting to mileage-based user fees
DESCRIPTION
Interstate Tolling: Financing Reconstruction and Shifting to Mileage-Based User Fees. by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation http://reason.org/transportation [email protected]. Why the current interest in tolling?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Interstate Tolling: Financing Reconstruction and Shifting to Mileage-Based User Fees
byRobert W. Poole, Jr.Director of Transportation PolicyReason Foundationhttp://reason.org/[email protected]
Why the current interest in tolling?
Large and growing highway funding shortfall;Vehicle miles traveled have increased 10X as fast as highway lane-miles;Little or no political will to increase fuel tax rates;Surveys show people prefer tolling to tax increases, for new roadways.
Interstate funding shortfallAnnual total Shortfall
Current $20.0B --
Sustain $24.3B $ 4.3B/yr
Improve $43.0B $23.0B/yr
Source: FHWA 2010 C&P Report, 2009 $
Interstate system investment estimates
Rebuild 233 interchange bottlenecks: $128BAdd HOT networks in 19 most-
congested metro areas: $139BReconstruct and modernize long-haul Interstates, starting with key truck routes: $1.5-2.5 trillion?
Advantages of tolls over gas taxes
Tailored to the cost of each roadFairness: those who benefit paySelf-limiting: roads onlySource for adding capacity when neededEnsures long-term maintenanceCan be used to control congestion
Advantages of gas taxLower cost of collection (assumed)
ButForthcoming Reason study estimates cost of all-electronic tolling (AET) can be as low as 5% of revenue collected.And . . . that real cost of fuel tax collection approaches 5% of revenue.
21st-century tolling Permanent funding sourceNo toll booths; all-electronicVariable rates (if congestion)Inflation-adjustedNo impact on state bond ratingHighways as network utility; tolls as utility bills.
Value-added tolling principleDon’t put tolls on “existing” highways.Do use tolls where you add value for highway customers:
New highwayMajor capacity additions Major reconstruction
A reconstructed highway is not “existing capacity.”
Political feasibility?NCHRP Synthesis 377, public opinion & tolling:
Public wants to see valuePublic prefers tangible rationalesPublic cares about use of revenuesPublic learns from experiencePublic uses knowledge & informationPublic believes in equity and fairnessPublic wants simplicity
Public favors tolls over increases in taxes, for needed highway projects.
Wisconsin Interstates tolling study (value-added tolling)
$26B cost to reconstruct and modernize 743-mile system.Assumed baseline toll rates of 5¢/mi. for cars and 20¢/mi. for trucks.Rural Interstates: NPV of revenue =110% of NPV of costsUrban Interstates: NPV of revenue = 71% of NPV of costs.
Urban Typical Sections for Scenario 3
Rural Typical Sections for Scenarios 3 and 4(Also used for HPV configuration analysis)
Interstate & expressway tolling as first phase of MBUFs
Conventional view (Big Bang approach)GPS box in every vehicleProgram led by federal governmentDrawbacks: Big Brother, very high cost
AET for Interstates and expressways:Use current low-cost AETEquip on/off-ramps only; charge per mileFund reconstruction of most important highway infrastructure
Role for public-private partnerships (PPPs)
Especially suited to major projects (mega-projects)Significant risk transfer to concession firm:
Construction riskCompletion riskTraffic & revenue risk
Incentive to design to minimize life-cycle cost, not initial costProper maintenance assured, long-termGrowing U.S. as well as global track record.
Track record of PABs and TIFIA loans on PPP toll projects
Four tolled mega-projects financed during credit-crunch years:Capital Beltway (VA): June 2008 $1.9 billionI-595 (FL): March 2009 $1.6 billionN. Tarrant Express (TX) Dec. 2009 $2.1 billion LBJ I-635 (TX) June 2010 $2.8 billion
Total: $8.4 billion
Needed reforms beyond MAP-21Remove limits on number of reconstructed Interstates with toll finance.Retain current limits on use of toll revenues (supported by highway user groups).Retain recently expanded TIFIA loan program.Remove the $15B cap on tax-exempt private activity bonds (PABs).Facilitate true nationwide AET interoperability.
Conclusions
Large increase in highway investment to modernize Interstates and expressways.Tolling is a better user fee than fuel taxes.Value-added tolling is politically feasible.Reconstruction is not “tolling existing highways.” Congress should open the door to expanded tolling, in the reauthorization bill.
Frequently asked questions1. Isn’t tolling “paying twice? Not if
project can’t be afforded via fuel taxes.2. Isn’t a toll the same as a tax? Not if it’s
a true user fee, used only for the toll project.
3. When do the tolls come off? Never. Will be needed for proper maintenance and eventual reconstruction.