interventional spine service at chi-st. francis: therapeutic and

113
Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and Diagnostic Procedures to Help Your Patients Dr. Nathan Murdoch, MD Heartland Radiology (GIRA) CME presentation September 18, 2015

Upload: vuongnhi

Post on 06-Feb-2017

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and Diagnostic Procedures to Help Your

Patients

Dr. Nathan Murdoch, MD Heartland Radiology (GIRA)

CME presentation September 18, 2015

Page 2: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Disclosure

• Part owner of Grand Island Imaging Center

Page 3: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Objectives • Therapeutic Interventional Spine Procedures

– Epidural Steroid Injections • Cervical, Thoracic, Lumbar, Sacrum • Interlaminar versus Transforaminal

– Facet Injections – Sacroiliac Joint Injections – Intercostal injections – Kyphoplasty – Epidural Blood Patch

• Diagnostic Interventional Spine Procedures – Myelgrams – Discograms – Image guided percutaneous biopsy or disc aspiration – Lumbar Puncture (can infuse Methotrexate for Oncology patients)

Page 4: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Clinical Algorithm: Low Back Pain

Iannuccilli, J, et al. Interventional Spine Procedures for Management of Chronic Low Back Pain—A Primer. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013;30:307–317.

Intra-articular Facet Injection

Page 5: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Epidural Steroid Injections

• Diagnostic and Therapeutic – Precise anatomic delivery of pharmaceuticals

• Radicular Back Pain (nerve symptoms, good literature support)

• Axial Back Pain (limited support in literature) • Anatomy

– Interlaminar vsTransforaminal vs Caudal – Cervicothoracic, Lumbosacral

Page 6: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Epidural Steroid Injections

• Caudal: Least effective in literature – Least precise deposition of pharmaceutical

Johnson, B., et al. Epidurography and Therapeutic Epidural Injections: Technical Considerations and Experience with 5334 Cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:697–705, April 1999.

Page 7: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Epidural Steroid Injections • Interlaminar: (Dorsal epidural space)

– With or without image guidance – Slightly more precise pharmaceutical deposition

Johnson, B., et al. Epidurography and Therapeutic Epidural Injections: Technical Considerations and Experience with 5334 Cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:697–705, April 1999

Page 8: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Epidural Steroid Injections • Transforaminal (supraneural vs infraneural):

– Image guided access to ventral epidural space – Most precise pharmaceutical deposition to pain generators (disc

pathology, nerve impingements) – Diagnostic value

Johnson, B., et al. Epidurography and Therapeutic Epidural Injections: Technical Considerations and Experience with 5334 Cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:697–705, April 1999

Page 9: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Epidural Steroid Injections • Evans 1930: Published “Intrasacral epidural

injection therapy in the treatment of sciatica.” – 100ml fluid injected into the sacral epidural space

diffuses throughout the spinal canal

• Barry and Kendall, 1962: Non-image guided interlaminar technique – “allow maximum concentration… at the level of

the lesion”. *Cleary, M., et al. The flow patterns of caudal epidural in upper lumbar spinal pathology. Euro Spine J. 2011. 20:804-

807. *Johnson, B., et al. Epidurography and Therapeutic Epidural Injections: Technical Considerations and Experience with 5334 Cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:697–705, April 1999 *Barry PJ, Hume Kendall P. Corticosteroid infiltration of the extradural space. Ann Phys Med 1962;6:267–273

Page 10: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Importance of Image Guidance

Page 11: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Importance of Image Guidance

Page 12: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Importance of Image Guidance

Page 13: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

How often IL ESI reaches ventral

• Imaging has helped us define how often material deposited in dorsal epidural space reaches the ventral epidural space

• IL epidural injection has unpredictable epidural spread

• Dorsal injectate reaches ventral epidural space only 47% of the time.

• Ventral epidural space thought to be location of pain generators

Weil, L, et al. Fluoroscopic Analysis of Lumbar Epidural Contrast Spread After Lumbar Interlaminar Injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol 89, March 2008.

Page 14: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Literature: Cervicothoracic • Both TFESI and ILESI have been reported efficacious in treating cervical

radiculitis • Prospective RCTs needed to compare techniques • ILESI reported potential complications: “dural puncture, bloating, nausea

and vomiting, vasovagal reaction, facial flushing, fever, nerve root injury, pneumocephalus, epidural hematoma, subdural hematoma, stiff neck, Cushing’s syndrome, transient paresthesias, hypotension, respiratory insufficiency, transient blindness, epidural abscess, paralysis, cord injury, and death”

• TFESI reported potential complications: “neck pain, transient increased radicular pain, nausea, vasovagal reaction, dural puncture, non-specific headache, transient lightheadedness, dyspepsia, fluid retention, transient global amnesia, vertebral artery injury, paralysis, cord infarction and cerebellar infarction, and death”

Huston, Christopher. Cervical epidural steroid injections in the management of cervical radiculitis: interlaminar versus transforaminal. A review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2009) 2:30–42.

Page 15: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Literature: Lumbosacral • Ghahreman, Ferch, Bogduk. The Efficacy of Transforaminal Injection of Steroids for the Treatment of

Lumbar Radicular Pain. Pain Medicine. 2010. 11: 1149–1168. – Prosective double-blind RCT (n=150). – TFESI pts demonstrated statistically significant pain decrease compared to sham injections, and less future surgery

• Price, et al. Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica. Health Technology Assessment 2005; Vol. 9: No. 33.

– UK National Health Service Cost Effectiveness Study – RCT between 3 unguided lumbar ESI vs placebo (n=228). – Transient improvement in pain & function at 3 weeks, no difference 6-52 weeks – Did not change need for future surgery

• Ackerman, et al. The Efficacy of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniations. ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA. Vol. 104, No. 5, May 2007.

– RCT comparing TFESI, ILESI & Caudal ESI for lumbar radicular pain (n=90). – “The TF route of epidural steroid placement is more effective than the C or IL routes. We attribute this observation to

a higher incidence of steroid placement in the ventral epidural space when the TF method is used.”

• Schaufele, et al. Interlaminar Versus Transforaminal Epidural Injections For The Treatment Of Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniations. Pain Physician Vol. 9, No. 4, 2006.

– Retrospective Case Control Series, TFESI vs ILESI (n=40) – TFESI more favorable than ILESI with short term pain score and long term need for future surgery

Page 16: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Epidural Steroid Injections

• Cervicothoracic: – Both TFESI and ILESI have been reported efficacious in

treating cervical radiculitis – Decision on technique likely more influenced by pt

presentation • Lumbosacral:

– Literature supports TFESI more than ILESI in terms of pain reduction and surgery sparing procedure

– IL may be warranted in certain circumstances (multilevel bilateral symptoms, TF route not anatomically feasible, adjunct to TF injection when TFESI will not spread centrally)

Page 17: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

My Cases: Epidural Steroid Injections Cervical ILESI

• 47 yo male with neck pain and right greater than left C7 radicular symptoms. MRI shows C6/7 disc bulge with bilateral NF stenosis.

• Pre-procedural pain: 9/10 • 48 hour pain: resolved

Page 18: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

C6/7 Cervical ILESI

Dorsal Epidural Fat

Page 19: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

C6/7 ILESI 4 procedure images

Needle Positioned Epidural Contrast Spread

Bilateral Epidural Contrast

Steroid

Circumferential Epidural Spread

Page 20: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Cervical TFESI

• 52 yo M with C5/6 DOC contributing to left C5/6 NFS and left C6 radiculopathy.

• Pre-procedure pain: 8/10 • Immediate Post-Procedure: 0/10 (duration

several days)

Page 21: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left C5/6 TFESI Vert artery Carotid Art

Dorsal Root Gang

Spinal Cord

Page 22: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left C5/6 TFESI

Page 23: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Lumbar ILESI

• 80 yo F with chronic low back pain, axial more than radicular. Multilevel bilateral degenerative changes and spinal stenosis on MRI.

• Pre-procedure pain: 8-9/10 • Post-procedure pain: nearly resolved @ 24hr

(duration: several weeks)

Page 24: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

L2/3 ILESI

Page 25: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

L2/3 ILESI

Loss of resistance, venous opacification

Needle repositioned, epidural contrast

Epidural washout & spread

Page 26: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Lumbar TFESI

• 38 yo M with left paracentral L5/S1 disc protrusion and extrusion.

• Low back pain and radicular left leg pain in left L5 and S1 distribution 8/10

• Immediate Post-Procedure: Pain resolved

Page 27: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

L5/S1 disc protrusion/extrusion Sag T2

Lateral Recess, S1 nerve Neural Foramen, L5 nerve

Ax T2. NF and LR stenosis

Ax T2. Disc extrusion along S1 nerve

Sag T2

Page 28: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left L5 TFESI

Lateral needle placement Contrast Injection

Neural foraminal contrast

Central, ventral epidural contrast

Page 29: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left L5 TFESI

Peripheral contrast

Central, ventral epidural contrast

Page 30: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left L5 TFESI

Central, ventral epidural contrast

Page 31: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left L5 TFESI

Central, ventral epidural contrast

Page 32: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left L5 TFESI

Central, ventral epidural contrast

Page 33: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Facet Syndrome

• Highly innervated synovial joints that can contribute to back and neck pain.

• Facet Joint Syndrome: Signs and Symptoms – Local paraspinal tenderness – Pain with hyperextension, rotation, lateral bend,

straight leg raising – Low back stiffness (greatest in morning) – Low back, hip and thigh cramping pain (above knee)

• No Paresthesias, or radiating pain below knee Silbergleit, R, et al. Imaging-guided Injection Techniques with Fluoroscopy and CT for Spinal Pain Management. Radiographics. 2001. 21:4.

Page 34: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Facet Syndrome: Importance of Imaging

• Helbig and Casey described clinical criteria associated with therapeutic success of facet injections – Back pain with groin or thigh pain – Focal paraspinal tenderness – Pain with ipsilateral extension/rotation – Radiographic evidence of significant facet arthrosis

• Other studies have shown the degree of degenerative facet change on advanced imaging to correlate poorly with response to facet injection

• Quality MRI imaging excludes other source of pain

Helbig T, Casey KL. The lumbar facet syndrome. Spine 1988; 13:61– 64.

Silbergleit, R, et al. Imaging-guided Injection Techniques with Fluoroscopy and CT for Spinal Pain Management. Radiographics. 2001. 21:4.

Page 35: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Facet Syndrome Interventions: Systematic Literature Review

• Intra-articular Facet Injections: – Cervical: limited short-term and long-term – Lumbar: moderate short-term and long-term

• Medial Branch Blockade: – C/T/L spine: moderate short-term and long-term

• Medial Branch Neurotomy: – C & L spine: moderate short-term and long-term – Thoracic: Indeterminite

Boswell, M., et al. A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Facet Joint Interventions in Chronic Spinal Pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10:229-253.

Page 36: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Facet Injections

• Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value • Most important information obtained: Was

the pt’s typical pain relieved? • Standard practice to add long acting steroid

agent to short acting anesthetic • Up to 6 months pain relief

* Fenton and Czervionke. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. Saunders. 2003. Chap. 2.

* Boswell, M., et al. A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Facet Joint Interventions in Chronic Spinal Pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10:229-253.

Page 37: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Facet Injection

• 67 yo M with axial low back pain. MRI shows degerative facets.

• Pre-procedure pain: up to 8/10 • Post-procedure pain: 0/10

Page 38: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Bilat L3/4 and L4/5 facet injections

Page 39: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Bilat L3/4 facet injections

Left Right

Page 40: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Bilat L4/5 facet injections

Page 41: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Medial Branch Block (Facet Denervation)

• Bogduk defined medial branch of dorsal ramus of spinal nerve to innervate facet joint.

• Each facet innervated by medial branch nerve at that level, and level above

• Therefore, facet denervation involves rhizotomy at 2 levels

Silbergleit, R, et al. Imaging-guided Injection Techniques with Fluoroscopy and CT for Spinal Pain Management. Radiographics. 2001. 21:4.

Page 42: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Medial Branch Block • High percentage of

patients will have false positive response to Medial Branch Block

• Require 2 injections with positive response before consider rhizotomy (RFA) – Anesthetic alone or with

steroid • Positive response to

Medial Branch Block: 50-80% reduction in pain

Iannuccilli, J, et al. Interventional Spine Procedures for Management of Chronic Low Back Pain—A Primer. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013;30:307–317.

Page 43: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Medial Branch Radiofrequency Ablation (Facet Denervation)

• Effective when patients have shown positive response to facet injections and medial branch blocks

• Longer pain relief than intra-articular injections (1-2 years)

* Lau, P, Bogduk, N, et al. The Surgical Anatomy of Lumbar Medial Branch Neurotomy (Facet Denervation). Pain Medicine. Vol 5. No. 3. 2004.

* Fenton and Czervionke. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. Saunders. 2003. Chap. 3

Page 44: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

SI Joint Injections

• Low back pain can be difficult to localize • Chronic LBP without radiculopathy • Diagnostic and Therapeutic value • Image-guidance essential for accurate intra-

articular needle tip placement – Only 22% intra-articular injectate with clinical

guidance alone • Immediate pain relief: 50-80% of pts • Duration of pain relief: 10 +/- 5 months

* Fenton and Czervionke. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. Saunders. 2003. Chap. 6.

Page 45: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

SI joint anatomy

• 2 part articulation between sacrum and ilium – Synovial lined cartilaginous joint

• Inferior ½ to 2/3 of joint

– Fibrous articulation

• Obliquity of joint varies along its course, and among individuals

• Innervation of SI joint from dorsal rami of S1-4 nerve roots

* Fenton and Czervionke. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. Saunders. 2003. Chap. 6.

Page 46: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

SI joint injection

• 41 yo F with right SI joint pain clinically.

Page 47: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Right SI joint injection

Synovial irregularity, could indicate synovitis.

Page 48: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Intercostal Nerve Block

• 85 yo F with 8-9/10 left rib pain after spell of coughing. CR and CT show emphysema, otherwise negative.

• Pre-procedure pain: 8-9/10 • Post-procedure pain: 3/10 • 24-hr post procedure pain: 0/10

Page 49: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Intercostal Nerve Block

No left rib fractures

Page 50: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Left 4-7 Intercostal Nerve Block

Page 51: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Kyphoplasty • Vertebral Compression

Fractures • Definition: “a fracture

causing loss of height of the vertebral body either by trauma or by pathology; it occurs most commonly in thoracic and lumbar spines. A common sequela of osteoporosis.”

Image courtesy of Medtronic, Inc.

Stedman’ Concise Medical Dictionary For The Health Professions. 4th Edition. LWW. Philadelphia. 2001. Page 209.

Page 52: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Quality of Life Impairment

• ADL’s limited: 24.6% • Difficulty standing > 2hr: 46.9% • Difficulty bending: 21.9% • Difficulty transitioning in/out of auto: 39.5% • Difficulty putting on socks: 27.2% • Reaching over head: 29.0%

Tosteson et al. Impact of Hip and Vertebral Fractures on Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Osteoporosis International. 2001. 12:1042-49.

Page 53: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Increased Mortality Rate with VCF • FIT trial (Fracture

Intervention Trial) • 6459 postmenopausal

females, age 55-81, with low BMD

• 907 pts with symptomatic fracture

• 3.8 year follow up • 6-fold mortality increase

with hip fx • 9-fold mortality increase

with spine fx – Deaths/1000 person years

Cauley, J, et al. Risk of Mortality Following Clinical Fractures. Osteoporosis International. August 2000, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 556-561

Page 54: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Patient Demographics

• Osteoporosis (84%) – Age related – Medication side-effect – Systemic Illness

• Pathologic fractures (11%) – Primary or Metastatic tumor

• Trauma in Non-Osteoporotic Pts. (5%) • Gender

– Female (69%) – Male (31%)

Layton, Thielen, Koch, Luetmer, Lane, Wald & Kallmes. Vertebroplasty, First 1000 Levels of a Single Center: Evaluation of the Outcomes and Complications. AJNR. 28: 683-89. April 2007.

Page 55: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

VCF Treatment Algorithm

Brunton et al. Vertebral Compression Fractures in Primary Care. Journal of Family Practice. Sep., 2005. 781-88.

MRI Helpful?

Very Important

Page 56: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

VCF Imaging Workup

• Radiographs • MRI • CT • Nuclear Medicine Bone Scan

Page 57: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Radiographs, with comparison

12/27/13 01/15/14

Page 58: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

MRI

* Statistically significant difference in clinical response favoring patients with bone marrow edema (BME) on pretreatment MR imaging over patients without BME.

Voormolen, M, et al. Pain Response in the First Trimester after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures with or without Bone Marrow Edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1579-85.

T8

T12

Page 59: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Sag T1 Sag T2 Sag STIR

Edema

Edema

Fluid Filled Fracture Cleft

MRI

*This retrospective review identified a trend toward better outcomes 6 to 12 months after treatment when compared with individuals whose treated levels did not demonstrate clefts.

Lane, JI, Timothy P. Maus, John T. Wald, et al. Intravertebral Clefts Opacified during Vertebroplasty: Pathogenesis, Technical Implications, and Prognostic Significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1642-46.

Page 60: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT with Bone Scan

*This retrospective paper demonstrated that increased activity identified by bone scintigraphy is highly predictive of a positive clinical response to percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Maynard, AS, Mary E. Jensen, Patricia A. Schweickert, William F. Marx, John G. Short, and David F. Kallmes. Value of Bone Scan Imaging in Predicting Pain Relief from Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1807-12.

L2 L2

L2

Page 61: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Contraindications

• Asymptomatic VB compression fractures • Patient improving with medical therapy • Ongoing local or systemic infection • Retropulsed bone fragment resulting in

myelopathy or symptoms • Spinal canal compromise secondary to tumor

resulting in myelopathy • Uncorrectable coagulopathy • Allergy to bone cement

Kandarpa, K. Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures. 4th Ed. LWW. Philadelphia. 2011. Pages 627-32.

Page 62: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Quality Imaging & Interpretation Matters! Good Clinical Exam Matters!

Sag T1 Sag T2 Sag STIR

Ax T2

MRI images obtained at outside facility

Page 63: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Quality Imaging & Interpretation Matters! Good Clinical Exam Matters!

• Low tesla open MRI: Interpretation: “mild spinal canal narrowing” – I recognized severe canal compromise, with cord

compression – I was suspicious of underling myelopathic changes not

detected by low tesla open MRI • My clinical exam: Patient with new and

progressing lower extremity and bladder neurologic symptoms.

• I called clinician. Case was cancelled. Patient undergoes RT.

Page 64: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

FREE (Fracture Reduction Evaluation)

Boonen, et al. Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures: 2-Year Results From a Randomized Trial. J of Bone and Mineral Research. 26:7. July, 2011. 1627-37.

Page 65: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

FREE Study

• Prospective, randomized non-blinded trial comparing kyphoplasty with non-surgical therapy for treatment of acute VCF. – Feb. 2003-Dec. 2005 – 21 centers in 8 countries – 24 month follow up

• 300 pts enrolled (1279 screened, 232 @ 24 mo) – 149 kyphoplasty (120 @ 24 mo) – 151 non-surgical therapy (112 @ 24 mo)

• Standard practices (analgesics, bed rest, bracing, PT, walking aids, Calcium, Vit. D, antiresorptive or anabolic agents)

Page 66: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

FREE Study

• Inclusion Criteria – Adults with 1-3 acute VCF from T5-L5 – Bone Marrow Edema on MRI – ≥ 15% vertebral height loss – Local investigator determined “painful” – VAS pain score ≥ 4/10 – Pain ≤ 3 months

Page 67: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

FREE Study

Page 68: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

FREE Study

Page 69: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

FREE Study

Page 70: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

FREE Study

* Kyphoplasty patients had 136 fewer limited activity days compared with Non-surgical management control patients.

Page 71: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Impact on Patient Mortality

Edidin, A, et al. Mortality Risk for Operated and Nonoperated Vertebral Fracture Patients in the Medicare Population. JBMR. Vol. 26, No. 7, July 2011, pp 1617–1626.

Page 72: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Impact on Mortality

• 100% U.S. Medicare Data Set from 2005-2008 • 858, 978 VCF patients identified • 119,253 Kyphoplasty patients • 63,693 Vertebroplasty patients • 4 year assessment • Survival determined by Kaplan-Meier

Page 73: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Impact on Mortality

• Percutaneous Cement Augmentation (Vertebroplasty & Kyphoplasty) associated with increased survival compared with non-operated patients

• Kyphoplasty associated with increased survival compared with vertebroplasty

Page 74: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

MZ, 88 yo Female

• 1 month history of acute “1000/10” mid-back pain standing from sitting position

• “Takes my breath away”, “every breath hurts” • Activities of Daily Living limited

– “Walking is impossible” – Unable to complete physical therapy b/c pain

• Narcotics make her nauseated. Tylenol not working.

• Acutely point tender on palpation over T9 • Initial X-rays at clinic office “negative”

Page 75: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Large FOV Sag T2

Acute T9 VCFX

Thoracic Spine MRI, SFMC Grand Island, NE

Old compression fx

Degenerative changes

Page 76: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Sag T1 Sag T2 Sag STIR

Edema

Edema

Fluid Filled Fracture Cleft

Minimal Posterior Retropulsion

Page 77: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

T9 Kyphoplasty, Bone Access Needle Advanced

Page 78: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Co-Axial Manual Drill Advanced

Page 79: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Co-Axial Balloon Inflated

Page 80: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Coaxial Filler Needle, Cement Injected

Page 81: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Needles Removed

Page 82: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Fracture Cleft Filled

Page 83: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Post-Procedure Clinical Results

• Pre-Procedural pain: “1000/10”, “every breath hurts”

• Immediate post-procedure pain score (still on table): “0/10”, “you must have a magic wand”

• 2-hr post procedure pain score: 0/10. – Patient up walking halls with physical therapist,

smiling. – “Boy, I’m sure glad I met you Dr. Murdoch”

Page 84: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Secondary to Nerve Root Sleeve Diverticulum

• Clinical: Postural Headache • Imaging:

– Brain MRI with contrast: features of CSF hypotension

– CT myelogram: Nerve Root Sleeve Diverticulum • Commonly at Cervical/Thoracic junction

• Treatment: – CT guided epidural blood patch directed toward

leak or NRSD

Kranz, J, Gray, L, et al. CT-Guided Epidural Blood Patching of Directly Observed or Potential Leak Sites for the Targeted Treatment of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. May, 2011. 32:832–38.

Page 85: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT-guided Epidural Blood Patch (NRSD)

• 8 patients referred for treatment, with post-procedural imaging

• 7 of 8 had nerve root sheath diverticuli • Symptom duration: 11.5 months (average) • 3 of 8: previous non-targeted epidural blood

patches • All pts demonstrated resolution of postural HA • All treated patients demonstrated resolution of

MRI findings of CSF hypotension Kranz, J, Gray, L, et al. CT-Guided Epidural Blood Patching of Directly Observed or Potential Leak Sites for the Targeted Treatment of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. May, 2011. 32:832–38

Page 86: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT guided Epidural Blood Patch

• 65 yo M with severe postural headaches, 9/10 upright and 2/10 laying down. Imaging evidence of pachymeningeal enhancement, subdural collections, concerning for possible spontaneous CSF hypotension. No trauma. Multilevel nerve root sheath diverticulum in spine on CT myelogram.

• Post-procedural pain: 0/10 • 4 month follow-up: 0/10

Page 87: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Pre-procedural, September 2014

Ax T2 FLAIR Ax T1 post-contrast Cor T1 post-contrast

Page 88: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT Myelogram, looking for CSF leak

• Multiple Nerve Root Sheath Diverticuli

C7/T1 L2/3 L3/4

Page 89: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT guided multi-level Epidural Blood Patch

C7/T1 L2/3

Page 90: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Follow-up MRI 7 months later

Sep, 2014

April, 2015

*Resolution of SD collections, pachymeningeal enhancement, and postural HA

Page 91: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Interventional Spine: Diagnostic

Page 92: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Lumbar CT Myelogram

Page 93: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Cervical Puncture CT Myelogram

Page 94: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Cervical Puncture CT Myelogram

Page 95: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Cervical Puncture CT Myelogram

Page 96: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Discogenic Pain: Discogram

• Contrast injected into disc nucleus pulposus • Clinical Diagnostic Response: assess pain

response with injection • Imaging Diagnostic Value: fluoroscopic and post-

procedural CT imaging. • Discography more sensitive in detecting internal

disc disruption than MRI • Variable clinical utility in terms of clinical decision

making. • Discogenic pain difficult to treat effectively.

* Fenton and Czervionke. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. Saunders. 2003. Chap. 9.

Page 97: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Discogram

• 39 yo F with prior L4/5 Fusion and PL stabilization. Severe persistent low back pain, presumed discogenic etiology based on MRI and clinical assessment

• Discogram ordered for preoperative planning

Page 98: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

MRI- L3/4 annular disc tear above fusion

Sag STIR

Page 99: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Fluoro 1mL each 2mL each 2mL & 2.5mL

Page 100: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT

L2/3 L3/4

Page 101: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Disc Bx and Aspiration

• 61 yo F with extreme LBP

Page 102: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Fluoro

Culture Positive for bacteria.

Page 103: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Flouro Guided Disc aspiration and VB biopsy

• 90 yo male with low back pain • MRI: Compression Fx at L1 (unchanged), VB

edema at L1 and L2, abnormal L1/2 and L2/3 disc signal

• Bone Scan: L1/2 abnormal uptake • Elevated PSA • Elevated CRP (and increasing) • Anticoagulated • Kyphoplasty requested

Page 104: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Disc Aspiration and VB bx

2013 Sag T1 2013 Sag STIR 2015 Sag T1 2015 Sag STIR

L1 L1 L1

L1

Page 105: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Disc Aspiration and VB bx

L1 and L2 increased radiotracer activity

Page 106: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

L1/2 Disc Aspiration

Page 107: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Disc aspiration and VB bx

L2 VB bx L1 VB bone bx

Page 108: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT guided T10 VB bone lesion biopsy

• 76 yo F with hx of smoking, multiple lung nodules and bone lesions, all hypermetabolic on PET-CT.

• Percutaneous T10 VB lesion bx

Page 109: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Lung and Bone lesions

Page 110: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

CT guided T10 VB biopsy

Pathology: Lung CA primary

Page 111: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Works Cited 1. Ackerman, et al. The Efficacy of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniations. ANESTHESIA & ANALGESIA. Vol.

104, No. 5, May 2007. 2. Barr, et al. Position Statement on Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation, A Consensus Statement… JVIR. 2014. 25: 171-181. 3. Barry PJ, Hume Kendall P. Corticosteroid infiltration of the extradural space. Ann Phys Med 1962;6:267–273 4. Berenson, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in

patients with cancer: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. (CAFÉ Study) Lancet Oncol. 2011 Mar;12(3):225-35. 5. Boonen, et al. Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures: 2-Year Results From a Randomized Trial. J of

Bone and Mineral Research. 26:7. July, 2011. 1627-37. 6. Boswell, M., et al. A Systematic Review of Therapeutic Facet Joint Interventions in Chronic Spinal Pain. Pain Physician 2007; 10:229-253 7. Brunton et al. Vertebral Compression Fractures in Primary Care. Journal of Family Practice. Sep., 2005. 781-88. 8. Burge, R, et al. Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025 Journal of Bone and Mineral

Research. Volume 22, Issue 3, pages 465-475, 4 DEC 2006 9. Calmels, V., J.-N. Vallée, M. Rose, and J. Chiras. Osteoblastic and Mixed Spinal Metastases: Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of Percutaneous

Vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:570-74 10. Cauley, J, et al. Risk of Mortality Following Clinical Fractures. Osteoporosis International. August 2000, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 556-561. 11. Cleary, M., et al. The flow patterns of caudal epidural in upper lumbar spinal pathology. Euro Spine J. 2011. 20:804-807. 12. Eck, et al. Comparison of Vertebroplasty and Balloon Kyphoplasty for Treatment of VCFs: a Meta-analysis of the Literature. Spine J. 2008 May-

Jun;8(3):488-97 13. Edidin, A, et al. Mortality Risk for Operated and Nonoperated Vertebral Fracture Patients in the Medicare Population. JBMR. Vol. 26, No. 7, July

2011, pp 1617–1626. 14. Fenton and Czervionke. Image-Guided Spine Intervention. Saunders. 2003. 15. Garfin, et al. Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Painful Osteoporotic Compression Fractures. SPINE. 26:14. 2001. 1511-15. 16. Ghahreman, Ferch, Bogduk. The Efficacy of Transforaminal Injection of Steroids for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain. Pain Medicine.

2010. 11: 1149–1168. 17. Helbig T, Casey KL. The lumbar facet syndrome. Spine 1988; 13:61– 64 18. Huston, Christopher. Cervical epidural steroid injections in the management of cervical radiculitis: interlaminar versus transforaminal. A review.

Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med (2009) 2:30–42. 19. Iannuccilli, J, et al. Interventional Spine Procedures for Management of Chronic Low Back Pain—A Primer. Semin Intervent Radiol 2013;30:307–

317. 20. Jenson, M, Evans, Mathis, Kallmes, Cloft, Dion. Percutaneous Polymethylmethacrylate Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral

Body Compression Fractures: Technical Aspects. AJNR. 18:1897-1904. Nov. 1997.

Page 112: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

21. Johnson, B., et al. Epidurography and Therapeutic Epidural Injections: Technical Considerations and Experience with 5334 Cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:697–705, April 1999.

22. Kallmes, D, et al. A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures. NEJM. 361;6 nejm.org. 8/6/2009. 23. Kandarpa, K. Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures. 4th Ed. LWW. Philadelphia. 2011. Pages 627-32. 24. Klazen, C, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label

randomized trial. Lancet. Pu Online Aug. 10, 2010. 25. Knavel, E., K.R. Thielen, and D.F. Kallmes. Vertebroplasty for the Treatment of Traumatic Nonosteoporotic Compression Fractures . AJNR Am J

Neuroradiol 2009;30:323-27. 26. Kranz, J, Gray, L, et al. CT-Guided Epidural Blood Patching of Directly Observed or Potential Leak Sites for the Targeted Treatment of Spontaneous

Intracranial Hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. May, 2011. 32:832–38. 27. Lane, JI, Timothy P. Maus, John T. Wald, et al. Intravertebral Clefts Opacified during Vertebroplasty: Pathogenesis, Technical Implications, and

Prognostic Significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1642-46. 28. Lau, P, Bogduk, N, et al. The Surgical Anatomy of Lumbar Medial Branch Neurotomy (Facet Denervation). Pain Medicine. Vol 5. No. 3. 2004. 29. Layton, Thielen, Koch, Luetmer, Lane, Wald & Kallmes. Vertebroplasty, First 1000 Levels of a Single Center: Evaluation of the Outcomes and

Complications. AJNR. 28: 683-89. April 2007. 30. Lieberman, IH, et al. Initial Outcome and Efficacy of “Kyphoplasty”…SPINE. 26:14. 1631-8. 2001. 31. Maynard, AS, Mary E. Jensen, Patricia A. Schweickert, William F. Marx, John G. Short, and David F. Kallmes. Value of Bone Scan Imaging in Predicting

Pain Relief from Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1807-12.

32. McDonald, R, A.T. Trout, L.A. Gray, A. Dispenzieri, K.R. Thielen, and D.F. Kallmes. Vertebroplasty in Multiple Myeloma: Outcomes in a Large Patient Series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:642-48.

33. National Osteoporosis Foundation http://www.nof.org. Accessed 4/8/2015. 34. Noble et al. Long Term Opioid Management for Chronic Noncancer Pain. Cochrane, 2010. 35. Pavy-Le Traon, et al. From Space to Earth: Advances in Human Physiology from 20 years of Bed Rest Studied. Eur J Appl Physiol (2007) 101:143–194. 36. Phillips, F, et al. An In Vivo comparison of the Potential for Extravertebral Cement Leak after Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty. SPINE. 27: 19. 2002.

2173-9. 37. Price, et al. Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica. Health Technology Assessment 2005; Vol. 9: No. 33. 38. Schaufele, et al. Interlaminar Versus Transforaminal Epidural Injections For The Treatment Of Symptomatic Lumbar Intervertebral Disc

Herniations. Pain Physician Vol. 9, No. 4, 2006. 39. Silbergleit, R, et al. Imaging-guided Injection Techniques with Fluoroscopy and CT for Spinal Pain Management. Radiographics. 2001. 21:4. 40. Society of Interventional Radiology Commentary on Vertebroplasty and the August Studies in the New England Journal of Medicine. Nov. 24, 2009.

http://www.sirweb.org. Accessed 4/9/15. 41. Stedman’ Concise Medical Dictionary For The Health Professions. 4th Edition. LWW. Philadelphia. 2001. Page 209. 42. Stedman’ Concise Medical Dictionary For The Health Professions. 4th Edition. LWW. Philadelphia. 2001. Page 711. 43. Tosteson et al. Impact of Hip and Vertebral Fractures on Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Osteoporosis International. 2001. 12:1042-49. 44. Voormolen, M, et al. Pain Response in the First Trimester after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression

Fractures with or without Bone Marrow Edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1579-85. 45. Weil, L, et al. Fluoroscopic Analysis of Lumbar Epidural Contrast Spread After Lumbar Interlaminar Injection. Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol 89, March

2008.

Page 113: Interventional Spine Service at CHI-St. Francis: Therapeutic and

Any Questions?

[email protected]