introducing the ecr road map dr paul chapman cranfield school of management
TRANSCRIPT
Introducing the ECR Road MapIntroducing the ECR Road Map
Dr Paul Chapman
Cranfield School of Management
The ECR Road Map
Call to Action
2. Map &Measure
4. Develop Solutions
5. Implement
6. Evaluate
1. Plan
3. Analyse
Source: Beck, A., Bilby, C.A.L., Chapman, P.A. and Harrison, A., (2001) Shrinkage: Introducing a Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain,
ECR Europe: Brussels.
The ECR Road Map
Call to Action
2. Map &Measure
4. Develop Solutions
5. Implement
6. Evaluate
1. Plan
3. Analyse
Call to Action – 1 pagerForegone Income Additional Costs
• Sell more…
• …more often…
• … at higher margin
• Variable costs:
• Fixed costs:
• Others:
Sales opportunity = € Cost opportunity = €
Scope:
Call to Action - Example
Foregone Income Additional Costs• Sell more…
– Wider product range– More store locations
• …more often…– OSA– Frequent ordering– Increase footfall
• … at higher margin– Trade up shoppers– New product lines
• Reduced Shrink• Reduced expenses
– Fixtures
• Less Inventory
Sales opportunity = €15m Cost Saving = € 2m
Scope = Hot product lines / all stores
The ECR Road Map
Call to Action
2. Map &Measure
4. Develop Solutions
5. Implement
6. Evaluate
1. Plan
3. Analyse
Source: Beck, A., Bilby, C.A.L., Chapman, P.A. and Harrison, A., (2001) Shrinkage: Introducing a Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain,
ECR Europe: Brussels.
90%
100%
Number of SKUs
Cu
mu
lati
ve L
osse
s
8% of SKUs account for 30% of loss
20% of SKUs account for 50% of loss
Concentrate on ‘Hot Products’
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Project Charter – 1 Pager• Which Products?
• Process Scope (from where to where?)
• Performance measures and improvement target– Shrinkage - ?? %
– Sales + ??%
• Time Table– Start date
– First results
– Project completion
Project Charter – 1 Pager
• Which Products?– Hot Products
• Process Scope (from where to where?)– Store operations in hot stores
• Performance measures and improvement target– Shrinkage - 50 %
– Sales + 20%
• Time Table– Start date now!
– First results next week
– Project completion 3 months
Board of Directors(Shareholders)
Colleagues
Logistics Service
Providers
Consumers
Customers
Suppliers
Regulatory/ Governmen
t Bodies
Project
Identify Stakeholders
Stakeholder Analysis – 1 pagerPeople or Groups Affected
Names
Level of Com
mitm
ent
Enthusiastic Support
Help It Work
Compliant
Hesitant
Indifferent
Uncooperative
Opposed
Hostile
The ECR Road Map
Call to Action
2. Map &Measure
4. Develop Solutions
5. Implement
6. Evaluate
1. Plan
3. Analyse
Source: Beck, A., Bilby, C.A.L., Chapman, P.A. and Harrison, A., (2001) Shrinkage: Introducing a Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain,
ECR Europe: Brussels.
Distribution Node
Store
Tesco DC, Hungary
Gillette Pack Centre, UK
Gillette DC,Hungary
Tesco store, Hungary
Supply Chain Overview
Break seal in yard
Back lorry on to dock
Unload pallets on to dock
Check number of pallets
Attach pallet label
Move pallet to warehouse location
Check pallet references
Receive products
Put away in warehouse
Pick order then marshal pallets
Load pallets into lorry
Dispatch to CarrefourDist. Ctr
Supply chain process hierarchy
Supplier DC
Retailer DC
Retailer Store
Supply Chain Site Process Steps
Map Process Detail
Lorry Arrives
Check Paperwork & Seal
Unload Delivery
Sign for delivery
Close & Seal Lorry
RetailerDC
SupplierDC
2
1
2
1 3
2
1 3 Retailer Store
Measure Basic Inputs and Outputs of Every Site
The ECR Road Map
Call to Action
2. Map &Measure
4. Develop Solutions
5. Implement
6. Evaluate
1. Plan
3. Analyse
Source: Beck, A., Bilby, C.A.L., Chapman, P.A. and Harrison, A., (2001) Shrinkage: Introducing a Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain,
ECR Europe: Brussels.
FMEA: Risk Assessment
• Step 1. Identify the failure modes in each step of the process– In your group brainstorm for 1 minute per step
– Capture every idea on a separate PostIt Note
• Step 2. Score each failure mode– Use the S / O / D scoring scale
S = severity
O = likelihood of occurrence
D = likelihood of detection
• Step 3. Brainstorm the causes of the highest scoring risk– Use the fishbone diagram
Risk Assessment Table – 1 pager
Process StepPotential Failure
Mode(s)Potential Effect(s)
of Failure S O D RPN
Risk Analysis Scoring
S
1 Single item
2 Case / inner pack
3 Crate / shipper carton
4 Pallet / dolly
5Lorry load
O
1 Yearly or less
2 Monthly
3 Weekly
4 Daily
5Hourly
D
1 Detectable prior to event
2 Detect as it happens
3 Detect at end of day
4 Detect at end of period
5Not detectable
FMEA ExampleProcess Step
Potential Failure Mode(s)
Potential Effect(s) of Failure S O D RPN
Goods moved to secure store-
room
Key is lostStore goods in hall
2 3 1 6
Lock Broken
Free access 2 1 1 2
Door not locked
Free access 2 5 4 40
No room in store- room
Store goods in hall
2 4 3 24Measures EffectMeasures EffectSeveritySeverity
Measures Failure & EffectMeasures Failure & EffectOccurrenceOccurrenceMeasures FailureMeasures FailureDetectionDetection
Fishbone Diagram
• Visual way to represent the relationship between a failure mode and possible causes
• Every failure mode will have several causes
Failure mode
People Materials
Machines Methods
Fishbone Diagram – 1 pager
Door not locked
People Materials
Lock broken
Don’t care, not important
Machines Methods
Unclear instructions
Lost key
Forgot
Key holder on holidayLate delivery to store
Other jobs took priority
Fishbone Diagram Example
Analysis Summary
Process StepPotential Failure
Mode(s)
Potential Effect(s) of
FailureS O D RPN
Goods moved to secure store-
room
Door not locked Free access 2 5 4 40
No room in store- room
Store goods in hall 2 4 3 24
Door not locked
1. FMEA
2. Fishbone
The ECR Road Map
Call to Action
2. Map &Measure
4. Develop Solutions
5. Implement
6. Evaluate
1. Plan
3. Analyse
Source: Beck, A., Bilby, C.A.L., Chapman, P.A. and Harrison, A., (2001) Shrinkage: Introducing a Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain,
ECR Europe: Brussels.
Action Planning
Improvem
ent / Potential O
pportunity ($)
High
Low
Slow/Hard Fast/Easy
Ease of ImplementationChange Project
QuickWin
MajorInitiative
The ECR Road Map
Call to Action
2. Map &Measure
4. Develop Solutions
5. Implement
6. Evaluate
1. Plan
3. Analyse
Source: Beck, A., Bilby, C.A.L., Chapman, P.A. and Harrison, A., (2001) Shrinkage: Introducing a Collaborative Approach to Reducing Stock Loss in the Supply Chain,
ECR Europe: Brussels.
Been There, Done That?
Attributes of Poor Projects
Attributes of Good
Projects
1. List the attributes of projects you have worked on
2. Highlight the key differences between poor projects & good ones
ECR Road Map Principles
• Collaborate and engage all stakeholders• Focus effort on the processes: Products /
Information / Money• Identify greatest oppportunities then target root
causes• Remove the opportunity for loss or error• Evaluate & learn
ECR Road Map Benefits
• Ensures the right resources and people engaged• Better and more sustainable results• Less daunting• More cost efficient• Higher probability of success• Quicker to implement• Lessons can be reapplied to other problems
The End
(or the beginning ….)