introduction and theory of chromatography -...

Download Introduction and Theory of Chromatography - CIREScires1.colorado.edu/jimenez/CHEM-5181/Lect/C1_Intro_Theory.pdf · Introduction and Theory of Chromatography CU- Boulder ... The mobile

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: vuhanh

Post on 07-Feb-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1

    Introduction and Theory of Chromatography

    CU- Boulder CHEM 5181

    Mass Spectrometry & Chromatography

    Prof. Jose L. Jimenez

    Reading: Braithwaite & Smith Chapters 1 & 2Last Updated: Nov. 2013

    2

    Business Items

    Next Tue: invited lecture from Lucas Smith, LECO HW due Tue (could extend some of it, but overlap with

    1st LV HW) FCQs online + our own feedback form, response rate

    counts towards class participation grade for everyone

  • 3

    Chromatogram

    Why is Chromatography So Successful?

    Single-Step Thermogram

    Much higher selectivity, by doing single step over and over

    Ziemann et al.UC-Riverside(now CU-Boulder)

    4

    Schematic of Column Chromatography

    Sequence of events At t=0 we will open the gate and let the analyte into the column Analyte will be carried by mobile phase Analyte may partition to stationary phase Analyte will be detected by its absorption of light at the detector

    Stationary Phase

    Stationary Phase

    MobilePhase

    Detector

    Data to Computer

    Lase

    r

  • 5

    Schematic of Column Chromatography II

    For simplicity, we will assume that the mobile phase moves in steps rather than continuously

    If analyte had no affinity to the stationary phase, it would just follow the mobile phase Emerge at the detector after tM (mobile phase time)

    Stationary Phase

    Stationary Phase

    6

    Schematic of Column Chromatography III

    If analyte has some affinity to the stationary phase, it will be retarded Equilibrium Kinetics

    Molecular mass transfer: diffusion Emerge at the detector after retention time tR

    SP

    MCCK s Distribution Ratio

  • 7

    Mechanisms of Partitioning to the Stationary Phase

    Stick to the surfaceDissolve into the bulk

    Q: (A) Left is Absorption, Right is Adsorption(B) Left is Adsorption, Right is Absorption(C) I dont know

    Fig. from McNair & Miller, Basic Gas Chromatography, Wiley, 1998

    8

    Retention and Mobile Phase Time

    Simplest chromatogram w/ 2 components Unretained peak (tM) Analyte peak (tR) Corrected retention time (tR)

  • 9

    Chromatography Simulator

    http://www.chem.uoa.gr/Applets/AppletChrom/Appl_Chrom2.html

    Investigate- Effect of K- Effect of N- Effect of RR

    10

    Using the Distribution Ratio: Single Step (Plate)

    Mobile phase

    Stationary Phase

    Analyte A

    Analyte B

    Q: If each symbol represents a mol, given 10 cm2 of surface to which analytes adsorb, and 100 cm3of liquid in which analytes are dissolved, what are KA & KB? Large K has more affinity for stationary phase

    Small K has more affinitiy for the mobile phase

  • 11

    The first step in a separationX = 0 , t = 0

    X = 1 , t = 1X = 0 , t = 1Pump

    Q: does molecular-level kinetics matter?

    Key concepts: Enriched in component which prefers mobile phase Not very good separation in 1-step (like thermogram). It is repetition that makes it great.

    12

    Partitioning in Real Chromatography

  • 13

    Factors Influencing Retention are those that influence distribution (equil.)

    Stationary phase: type & properties Mobile phase: composition & properties Intermolecular forces between

    Analyte & mobile phase Analyte & stationary phase

    Temperature

    14

    Intermolecular Forces I Based on electrostatic forces

    Like-attracts like or oil and water (similar electrostatic properties)

    Polar/polar & non-polar/non-polar Molecules with dissimilar properties are not

    attracted Polar retention forces

    Ionic interactions (IC) Hydrogen bonding (permanent dipoles) Dipole-Induced dipole

  • 15

    Intermolecular Forces II (Dipole) Polar forces (cont.):

    Energy of dipole-dipole interaction

    Factor of 10 variation on permanent dipole moment Factor of 104 variation on interaction energies

    As r6 => mainly at the surfaces

    kTrSA

    D 6

    222

    A dipole moment, A: analyte, S: stationary phase

    16

    Intermolecular Forces III (London) Londons Dispersion Forces

    Most universal interaction between molecules Only one for non-polar species

    Due to induced dipoles Relatively weak

    Energy of interaction:

    is the polarizability, I: ionization potential, A: analyte, S: stationary phase

    )(23

    6SA

    SAPAL IIr

    II

  • 17

    Clicker QuestionA. The chemical nature of the mobile phase

    affects distribution in gas-chromatography (GC) & liquid chromatography (LC)

    B. The mobile phase affects distribution in GC but not LC

    C. The mobile phase affects distribution in LC but not GC

    D. The mobile phase affects doesnt affect distribution in either GC or LC

    E. I dont know

    18

    Separating Efficiency Peak WidthAssume Gaussian Peaks FWHM = wh = 2.36HWHM = 1.18

    Base Width of Peak (wb) Width at intersection of

    tangents at inflexion points (+/- ) and the baseline

    wb = 4 95.5% of molecules are

    within wb Assuming that the

    Gaussian model holds!

    Figure 2.3, Braithwaite & Smith

    When in doubt, use NORMDIST in Excel or GAUSS in Igor

  • 19

    Resolution in Chromatography Objective: accurate measurement

    of individual peak areas (spectra) FWHMtRs *2

    What is the resolution if this is a mass spectrum? If it is a chromatogram?

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    46 51 56

    m/z OR t'R

    Sign

    al In

    tens

    ity (A

    rbitr

    ary

    Uni

    ts)

    20

    Clicker Question

    Analysis B is more desirable than AA. In MS & Chrom.B. In MS but not Chrom.C. In Chrom but not MSD. In neither MS nor ChromE. I need a coffee

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 1800

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180

    A B

  • 21

    Resolution vs Peak Integration

    http://www.vias.org/simulations/simusoft_peakoverlap.html

    22

    Can One Have Too Much Resolution?

    5.12.1 sR

  • 23

    What to do if you have too much resolution?

    If you have too much resolution, you can Shorten the column Increase temperature (GC), flow rate=> Shorten the analysis

    24

    Separating Efficiency Peak Asymmetry

    Q: what can cause peak asymmetry?

  • 25

    Separating Efficiency Peak Asymmetry Tailing: some part of the

    stationary phase binds analyte molecules more strongly

    Fronting: some molecules move ahead (inject too much sample => saturate Stat. Phase)

    Peak Asymmetry

    0.9 < As < 1.2 for acceptable chromatography

    h 10%at s abA

    Equations for Calculation of Chromatographic Figures of Merit for Ideal and Skewed Peaks, J.P. Foley and J.G. Dorsey, Anal. Chem., 55: 730-737, 1983

    26

    Separating Efficiency Peak Width II Described by variance 2 (units: s2)

    determined from Gaussian fit to peak Classical chromatography theory

    Separation in N discrete steps (plates)

    or

    Also broadening increases as tR increases:

    and in practice:

    N12

    N1

    NtR

    1 2

    RtN

  • 27

    Height Equivalent of a Plate

    Height Equivalent to One Theoretical Plate (HETP)N

    LH

    Application: Calculate H and N for peak 18, assuming a 60 m column

    A. H ~ 5 mB. H ~ 50 mC. H ~ 500 mD. H ~ 5 mmE. I dont know

    28

    Concept of Peak Capacity ()

    Fig. 4. Mobilitymass plot of a complex mixture containing multiple classes of ions. In this case peptide, DNA, and carbon cluster ions are observed. Lines are superimposed onto the plot to indicate the mobilitymass trends for each class of molecule.

    of IMS-MS for peptides ~ 2600 for LC-FTICR ~ 6 x 107

    PeakIndividualan ofAreaor TimeSeparationfor Available Areaor Time

    Peak capacity of ion mobility mass spectrometry: Separation of peptides in helium buffer gas. Brandon T. Ruotolo, Kent J. Gillig, Earle G. Stone and David H. Russell. Journal of Chromatography B 782, 1-2, 25, 2002, Pages 385-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00566-4

  • 29

    Diffusion: Ficks 1st Law

    dydCDj AAA

    When there is a gradient in concentration of a species that can diffuse in medium

    jA: molecular flux of A (moles cm-2 s-1) CA: concentration of A (moles cm-3) DAB: diffusivity of A in B (cm2 s-1)

    ~ 0.1-0.01 cm2 s-1 in gases~10-5 cm2 s-1 in liquids

    Concentration (y)

    Y (position in SP)

    SP

    Concentration (y)

    Y (position in SP)

    SP

    30

    Clicker Question When an analyte is diffusing in the

    stationary phase, equilibrium will be reached faster

    A. When DA is smallB. When DA is largeC. When SP thickness is largeD. A and CE. I dont know

  • 31

    Mass Transfer Kinetics: Ficks Law

    Stat. Phase

    From Bird, Stewart & Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, 2nd Ed. 2002

    YD

    SW A

    ABAy 00

    dydDj AABAy

    Initially no substance A Pulse at the surface Transient concentration Steady state profile at long

    times

    WAy: mass flux of A A: mass fraction of A DAB: diffusivity of A in B S: surface area; : density

    jAy: molecular mass flux of A

    32

    Situation in Column Chromatography

    Stat. Phase

    t = 1

    t = 2

    Mass transfer takes time => separation + limit on resolution

    t = 3

    t = 4

    t = 5

    t = 6

  • 33

    Diffusion: Ficks 2nd Law

    Conservation of mass for diffusing species in control volume Per unit area

    perpendicular to diffusion

    Concentration (y)

    y (position in SP)

    SP

    outinA jj

    ttyC

    ),( 1

    jin

    joutC(y1,t)

    ytyyCD

    ytyCDy

    ttyC AAA

    ),(),(),( 111

    y1y1+y

    34

    Diffusion: Ficks 2nd Law II

    When things are changing in time:

    Once CA is the same everywhere, we have reached equilibrium in the SP

    Concentration (y)

    y (position in SP)

    SP

    2

    ),(),(y

    tyCDt

    tyC AA

    A

    Q: can we estimate order-of-magnitude of time needed?

  • 35

    Time Scale of Mass Transfer For transfer across SP

    thickness Y Start with:

    Order-of-magnitude analysis

    Simplifying:

    2

    ),(),(y

    tyCDt

    tyC AA

    A

    2YCDC AA

    D

    A

    AD D

    Y 2

    Concentration (y)

    y (position in SP)

    SP

    36

    Numerical Example of Mass Transfer Assume

    Column diameter = 100 m Film thickness: Y = 1 m Diffusivity of analyte in stationary phase

    DAB= 10-6 cm2 s-1 Solubility of A in B is 1% of volume MWA = 100 g mol-1

    Questions What is the time scale of mass transfer? What should be the time scale of flow along 1 mm of the

    column? What is the max. amount of analyte that can be in the

    stationary phase per 1 mm of column length?

  • 37

    Band Broadening Processes

    Non-column broadening Dispersion of analyte in

    Dead volume of injector Connection between injector & column Connection between column & detector

    Emphasis on minimizing dead volume (injectors, fittings)

    Column broadening: Van Demteer model

    Stationary Phase

    Stationary Phase

    Mobile Phase

    Detector

    Lase

    r

    38

    Schematic of Column Chromatography III

    If analyte has some affinity to the stationary phase, it will be retarded Equilibrium Kinetics

    Molecular mass transfer: diffusion Emerge at the detector after retention time tR

    SP

    MCCK s

  • 39

    GC vs. HPLC ColumnsGC HPLC

    Most GC columns do NOT have particles Most HPLC columns do have particles Why?

    A. Particles are needed to prevent liquid flow for being too fastB. Particles are needed in HPLC to shorten diffusion distance in MPC. Particles are not needed in GC because diffusion is very fastD. B & CE. I dont know

    40

    Effect of Mobile Phase velocity on H

    Experiment Repeat the same

    separation, same column and mobile phase

    Determine H vs. flow rate

    Observe an optimum, H increases to both sides

    Goethe: there is nothing more practical than a good theory

    Skoog & Leary, 4th Ed

  • 41

    Van Deemter Model: B Term Longitudinal Diffusion Basically molecular diff., as ifmobile phase was not moving

    Clicker 1A. B term as u B. B term as u C. B term D. Dont know

    )(uf

    Clicker 2. B term isA. more imp in GCB. More imp in HPLCC. Similar importanceD. I dont know

    42

    Van Deemter Model: A Term Broadening

    Eddy diffusion &unequal pathways Molecules may travel unequal distances Particles (if present) cause eddies & turbulence A depends on size of stationary particles (want small) and

    their packing (want uniform) (or coating in TLC plate) GC: 150 m, HPLC: 5-10 m

    PdA ClickerA. A term as u B. A term as u C. A term D. Dont know

    )(uf

  • 43

    Van Deemter Model: C Terms I Accounts for finite time for mass transfer (equil. btwanalyte in stationary and mobile phase not instantaneous) Most important effect in GC & HPLC CS accounts for stationary phase mass transfer

    df: stationary phase film thickness DS: diffusion coeff. of analyte in SP Thinner films reduce mass transfer time& broadening

    But also reduce capacity of the column

    s

    fs D

    dC

    2

    44

    Van Deemter Model: C Terms II CM accounts for mass transfer on themobile phase interface with the SP In packed columns:

    dp is particle diameter In open columns

    dc is column diameter

    M

    PM D

    dC2

    M

    CM D

    dC2

    Clicker 1A. C term as u B. C term as u C. C term D. Dont know

    )(uf

    Clicker 2. CM term isA. More important in GCB. More important in HPLCC. Similar importanceD. I dont know

  • 45

    Van Deemter Model of Band Broadening

    Tries to explain previous experiment H: plate height u: average linear velocity

    H: as small as possible (calculate Hmin?) Some terms decrease, other increase with u

    There should be optimum u There are alternative models (see reading)

    uCuCuBAH MS

    MtLu

    46

    Optimum Mobile Phase Velocity We want N highest, H lowest Do we want something else?

  • 47

    Optimum Mobile Phase Velocity: GC & HPLC

    Q: differences in A, B, C between Supercritical Fluid Chrom. & HPLC?