introduction to bioinformatics: lecture xv empirical force fields and molecular dynamics
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to Bioinformatics: Lecture XV Empirical Force Fields and Molecular Dynamics. Jarek Meller Division of Biomedical Informatics, Children’s Hospital Research Foundation & Department of Biomedical Engineering, UC. Outline of the lecture. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 1
Introduction to Bioinformatics: Lecture XVEmpirical Force Fields and Molecular Dynamics
Jarek MellerJarek Meller
Division of Biomedical Informatics, Division of Biomedical Informatics, Children’s Hospital Research Foundation Children’s Hospital Research Foundation & Department of Biomedical Engineering, UC& Department of Biomedical Engineering, UC
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 2
Outline of the lecture
Motivation: atomistic models of molecular systems Empirical force fields as effective interaction models
for atomistic simulations Molecular Dynamics algorithm Kinetics, thermodynamics, conformational search and
docking using MD Limitations of MD: force fields inaccuracy, long range
interactions, integration stability and time limitations, ergodicity and sampling problem
Beyond MD: other protocols for atomistic simulations
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 3
Molecular systems and interatomic interactions
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 4
Molecular systems and interatomic interactions
helix
strand
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 5
Molecular Dynamics as a way to study molecular motion
What is wrong with the previous pictures? Real molecules “breathe”: molecular motion is
inherent to all chemical processes, “structure” and function of molecular systems
For example, ligand binding (oxygen to hemoglobin, hormone to receptor etc.) require inter- and intra-molecular motions
Another example is protein folding – check out some MD trajectories
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 6
Web watch: folding simulations using MD and distributed computing: Folding@Home
Folding@HomeVijay S Pande and colleagues, Stanford Univ. For example, folding simulations of the villin headpiece …
http://www.stanford.edu/group/pandegroup/folding/papers.html
Some more MD movies from Ron Elber’s group:http://www.cs.cornell.edu/ron/movies.htm
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 7
Two approximations and two families of MD methods
The quantum or first-principles MD simulations (Car and Parinello), take explicitly into account the quantum nature of the chemical bond. The electron density functional for the valence electrons that determine bonding in the system is computed using quantum equations, whereas the dynamics of ions (nuclei with their inner electrons) is followed classically.
In the classical mechanics approach to MD simulations molecules are treated as classical objects, resembling very much the “ball and stick” model. Atoms correspond to soft balls and elastic sticks correspond to bonds. The laws of classical mechanics define the dynamics of the system.
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 8
From quantum models to classical approximations
Born-Oppenheimer approximation, potential energy surface and empiricalforce fields, parametrizing atomistic force fields by combination of ab initio,experiment and fitting …
Ab initio methods: computational methods of physics and chemistry that are based on fundamental physical models and, contrary to empirical methods, do not use experimentally derived parameters except for fundamental physical constants such as speed of light c or Planck constant h.
The NIH guide to molecular mechanics:http://cmm.info.nih.gov/modeling/guide_documents/molecular_mechanics_document.html
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 9
Force fields for atomistic simulations
pairsatom ij
ji
pairsatom ij
ij
ij
ijij
torsionsii
i
anglesii
i
bondsii
iN
r
qqk
rr
ncb
lla
U
612
20
201
4
))cos(1(2
)(2
)(2
),,(
rr
Definition Empirical potential is a certain functional form of the potential energy of a system of interacting atoms with the parametersderived from ab initio calculations and experimental data.
How to get parameters that would have something to do with thephysical reality: experiment and ab initio calculations, also just fitting!
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 10
Dispersion interactions and Lennard-Jones potential
-ij
ij rij
Problem Find that the minimum of van der Waals (Lennard-Jones) potential
Dispersion (van der Waals) interactions result from polarization of electron clouds and their range is significantly shorter than that of Coulomb interactions.
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 11
Time evolution of the system: Newton’s equations of motion
),,( ),,( 1iii
Ni z
U
y
U
x
UUi
rrF r
2
2 )(
dt
tdm iii
rF
))(),(),(()( tztytxt iiii r
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 12
Solving EOM: Coulomb interactions and N-body problem
Solving EOM for a harmonic oscillator – simple …
Potential: U(x)=1/2 k x2 ; Solution: x(t) = A cos(t+)
Problem Show that 2=k/m
Solving EOM for a system with more than two atoms and Coulomb orLennard-Jones potentials – no analytical solution, numerical integration
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 13
Numerical integration of EOM: the Verlet algorithm
2)()()(2)( t
m
tttttt
i
iiii
Frrr
Definition Molecular Dynamics is a technique for atomistic simulationsof complex systems in which the time evolution of the system is followed using numerical integration of the equations of motion.
One commonly used method of numerical integration of motion was firstproposed by Verlet:
Problem Using Taylor’s expansions derive the Verlet formula given above.
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 14
Fast motions and the integration time step
For example, O-H bonds vibrate with a period of about 17 fs
To preserve stability of the integration, t needs to very short -of the order of femtoseconds (even if fastest vibrations are filtered out)
Except for very fast processes, nano- and micro-seconds timescales are required: time limitation and long time dynamics
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 15
Long range forces as computational bottleneck
Long range interactions: electrostatic and dispersion interactionslead (in straightforward implementations) to summation over allpairs of atoms in the system to compute the forces
Environment, e.g. solvent, membranes, complexes
Implicit solvent models: from effective pair energies to PB models
Explicit solvent models: multiple expansion, periodic boundary conditions (lattice symmetry), PME
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 16
Examples of problems and MD trajectories
Thermodynamics: what states are possible, what states are“visited”, statistics and averages for observables, chemical processes as driven by free energy differences between states, MD as a sampling method (different ensembles and the corresponding MD protocols)
Kinetics: how fast (and along what trajectory) the system interconverts between states, rates of processes, mechanistic insights, MD provides “real” trajectories and intermediate states, often inaccessible experimentally
Specific applications: sampling for energy minimization and structure prediction, homology modeling, sampling for free energy of ligand binding, folding rates and folding intermediates etc.
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 17
Ligand diffusion in myoglobin
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 18
Ligand diffusion in myoglobin
JM - http://folding.chmcc.org 19
Molecular Dynamics as a way to study molecular motion
Quantum (first principles) MD is computationally expensive
Empirical force fields as a more effective alternative No chemical change though, problem with
parametrization and numerous approximations (read inherent limitations of empirical force fields)
Commonly used force fields and MD packages: Charmm, AMBER, MOIL, GROMOS, Tinker
Other limitations of MD: long range interactions, integration stability and time limitations, ergodicity and sampling problem