introduction to designing elastomeric vibration isolators christopher hopkins opti 512 08 dec 2009

26
Introduction to Designing Elastomeric Vibration Isolators Christopher Hopkins OPTI 512 08 DEC 2009

Upload: alfred-carr

Post on 17-Dec-2015

231 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Introduction to Designing Elastomeric Vibration Isolators

Christopher HopkinsOPTI 512

08 DEC 2009

Introduction

• Why elastomers?• Key design parameters– Loading– Configuration– Spring rates

• Design considerations• Steps to designing a simple isolator

Elastomers

• An eastomer is any elastic polymer– Silicone Rubber– Butyl Rubber– Fluorosilicone Rubber

• Material selection dependent on application– Ulitimate Loading– Sensitivity to Environment– Internal Properties

Elastomeric Isolators

• Engineered properties can meet specific applications– Modulus of elasticity– Internal dampening

• Homogeneous nature allows for compact forms

• Easily manufactured– Molded– Formed in place

Key Isolator Design Parameters

• Configuration• Loading• Spring rate– Shear, Bulk, and Young’s modulus– Geometry

• Ultimate strength• Internal dampening• Maximum displacement

Simple Isolator Configurations

• Planer Sandwich Form• Laminate• Cylindrical

Spring Rates

• Isolator spring rate sets system resonant frequency– Ratio of resonant frequency to input frequency

plus dampening control amount of isolation• For an elastomer, spring rate is determined by– Shape factor– Loading: shear, compression, tension– Material Properties: bulk, shear, and young’s

modulus

Transmissibility

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30.1

1

10

Transmissibility vs. Frequency Ratio

η = 0.01η = 0.05η = 0.1η = 0.5

fr/f

Tran

smis

sibi

lity

Shape Factor

• Ratio of load area to bulge area• Easy to calculate for simple shapes simply loaded– Planer sandwich forms are simple– Tube form bearings are more difficult, but can be

approximated as a planer form

Shear Spring Rate

• Design isolator to attenuate in shear if possible• Dependent on load area, thickness, and shear

modulus• Shear modulus is linear up to 75%-100% strain• Shear modulus for large shape factors is also

effected by high compressive loads• When aspect ratio exceeds 0.25 a correction factor

is added to account for bending

Compression Spring Rate

• Designed properly, compression can provide high stiffness

• Depends on load area, effective compression modulus, and thickness

• Effective compression modulus– Linear up to 30% strain– Can be tricky to compute

Tension Spring Rate

• Try to avoid having elastomeric isolators in tension– Low modulus– Can be damaged by relatively low loads

• Apply preload avoids this– Easy to do for cylindrical isolators– Must include correction to shape factor

Finding Modulus• Many elastomers are listed with only with

– Durometer Shore hardness– Ultimate strength (MPa or psi)

• Contacting manufacturer may be useful• Perform tests• Shear stress is 1/3 Young’s modulus as poisson’s ratio approaches

0.5• Use Gent’s relation between Shore A hardness and Young’s

modulus (if you gotta have it now)

Effective Compression Modulus, Ec

• Dependent on shape factor, young’s modulus and bulk modulus

• Also know as the apparent compressive modulus• As Poisson’s ratio approaches 0.5, Ec may be

separated into three zones depending on shape factor– For large shape factors: Ec ≈ bulk modulus

– For small shape factors: Ec ≈ young’s modulus– Transisiton zone for intermediate shape factors

Computing Ec

• Gent provides a reference graph• Hatheway found empirically that the transition

zone is (Ec/E) (t/D)∙ 1.583=0.3660– Can calculate Ec or the simple case of a circular

load area of diameter D and thickness t– Find the break points• First break point: (t/D)1.583 = 0.366 (E/E∙ B)• Second break point: (t/D)1.583 = 0.366

Compression Modulus vs. Shape Factor [Gent]

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 1001

10

100

1000

Stiffening vs. Thickness Ratio [Hatheway]Circular Cross Section, Eb=1.2 GPa, E=1.6 Mpa

Thickness Ratio, t/D

Stiffe

ning

Rati

o Ec

/E

Laminate Isolator

• Shear modulus is not effected by shape factor (if aspect ratio is <0.25)

• Effective compression modulus strongly influence by shape factor

• Possible to design an isolator that is very stiff in compression and compliant in shear

Cylindrical Isolator

• Shear– Axial loading– Torsion

• Compression– Radial loading

• Shape factor calculation for compression

Design Considerations

• What is being Isolated?• What are the inputs?• Are there static loads?• What are the environmental conditions?• What is the allowable system response?• What is the service life?

Example Design Process for a Simple Isolator

• Single excitation frequency• Circular cross section, planar geometery• All other components infinitely rigid• Low dampening• Attenuation provided in shear

Design Process

• Specifications– Mass, input vibration, required attenuation, max

displacement• Use transmissibility to determine resonance

frequency and spring rate• Find isolator minimum area (A)– Total number of isolators and max allowable stress

• Select modulus (G)

Design Process (con’t)

• Knowing area (A), modulus (G), and spring rate (ks), calculate thickness (t)– Calculate radius, verify aspect ratio < 0.25 to avoid

bending effect• Find static deflection– Is static plus dynamic deflection < max allowable

deflection?• Find static shear strain– Low strain reduces fatigue (<20%)

Conclusion

• Careful selection of parameters necessary to use methods presented. Can get complicated quick– Low strains– Low loads

• Try to stay clear of the transition zone between Young’s and the bulk modulus

• For multiple input frequencies, need to consider if dampening (η) is necessary

• May need to include considerations other than just isolation– Stresses due to CTE mismatch

References

• P. M. Sheridan, F. O. James, and T. S. Miller, “Design of components,” in Engineering with Rubber (A. N. Gent, ed.), pp. 209{Munich:Hanser, 1992)

• A. E. Hatheway, “Designing Elastomeric Mirror Mountings,”Proc. of SPIE Vol. 6665 (2007)

• Daniel Vukobratovich and Suzanne M. Vukobratovich “Introduction to Opto mechanical design”‐

• A. N. Gent, “On The Relation Between Indentation Hardness and Young’s Modulus,” IRI Trans. Vol. 34, pg.46-57 (1958)

Questions?