introduction to ethics lecture 9 the challenge of cultural relativism by david kelsey

11
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

Upload: candace-hill

Post on 18-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

Introduction to EthicsLecture 9

The Challenge of Cultural Relativism

By David Kelsey

Page 2: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

What is Relativism?

• Different ways of defining Cultural Relativism:– 1. There is no objective standard that can be used to judge one societal code better

than another.

– 2. The moral code of our own society has no special status; it is merely one among many.

– 3. There is no “universal truth” in ethics--that is, there are no moral truths that hold for all peoples at all times.

– 4. The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society; that is, if the moral code of a society says that a certain action is right, then that action is right, at least within that society.

– 5. We should adopt an attitude of tolerance toward the practices of other cultures.

Page 3: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

The Cultural Differences Argument

• The cultural differences argument:– 1. Different cultures have different moral codes.

– 2. Therefore, there is no objective “truth” in morality. Right and wrong are only matters of opinion, and opinions vary from culture to culture.

• Evidence for 1: – The Callatians: ate the dead

– The Greeks: cremation

– The Eskimo: Infanticide

Page 4: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

Arguments against Cultural Relativism: The Cultural Differences Argument isn’t valid

• The argument isn’t valid:– Although 1) is true 2) could still be false.

– The first premise concerns what people believe while the conclusion concerns what really is the case.

– There is no reason to think that if there is a moral truth everyone will know it.

• Reply:– Is the argument meant to be deductive or inductive?

– The missing premise…

Page 5: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

Cultural Relativism and its implausible consequences

• If Cultural Relativism were true:– 1. We could no longer say that the customs of other societies are morally

inferior to our own.• You couldn’t criticize the Nazi’s…

– 2. We could decide whether actions are right or wrong just by consulting the standards of our society.

• To find right action we must simply consult our societies moral code.

• But then on this view we cannot even criticize our own societies moral code.

• But is our societies moral code really perfect?

Page 6: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

One final consequence of Relativism

• 3. The idea of moral progress is called into doubt.– There is no independent standard by which to judge our moral code now

compared to our moral code hundreds of years ago. Thus, neither code is better.

– But haven’t some changes in our moral code been for the better?• Consider the rights of minority groups gained in this country…

– But to say progress has occurred is to say things are better now.

– And further, how do we explain Social Reform: • No progress in changing a societies ideals only in the case that the society isn’t

living up to its ideals…

Page 7: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

There is less disagreement than it seems

• What appears to be disagreement about value is reducible to disagreement of belief about fact.

– Just ask why the apparent disagreement in value occurs and a factual disagreement appears.

– Examples:• A culture in which people think it’s wrong to eat cows.

– They believe the souls of humans inhabit the bodies of cows…

• The Eskimo’s practice infanticide to survive

Page 8: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

All Cultures have some values in common

• Common values:– 1. All cultural groups must value protecting their infants.

• 1. Human infants are helpless and cannot survive if they are not given extensive care for a period of years.

• 2. Therefore, if a group did not care or its young, the young would not survive, and the older members of the group would not be replaced.

• 3. Therefore, any cultural group that continues to exist must care for its young.

– 2. All cultural groups must value truth telling.• Communication in society would break down…

Page 9: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

All societies must prohibit murder

• A 3rd value all societies have in common:

• 3. All cultural groups must prohibit murder.– Individuals would become self sufficient and society would break apart.

• Thus, there are some moral rules that all societies will have in common, because these rules are necessary for society to exist.

Page 10: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

What can be learned from Cultural Relativism?

• What can we learn:– Many of our practices are merely peculiar (relative) to our society.

• Many of our preferences are just social conventions.

• Examples…

– Keep an open mind• So just because we believe some action to be right doesn’t mean it is.

• And just because someone else disagrees with something we believe or do, this doesn’t mean they are incorrect.

Page 11: Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey

Final Thoughts

• Final Thoughts:– Any final thoughts on morality after we have considered Relativism?

• Thoughts?

– My thoughts: • Can we say morality consists of some concepts that are more relative than

others?