introduction to fingerprinting classification 1 authors: veon and oboyle 2007

19
INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and O’Boyle 2007

Upload: claire-mcgrath

Post on 27-Mar-2015

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING

Classification

1

Authors: Veon and O’Boyle 2007

Page 2: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

LOOP• LOOPS

– Comes in– Recurves– Goes back

out same side

– Usually curving around a delta

2

Page 3: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

ARCH

• ARCH– In one side– Rises– Falls– Goes out

the other side

3

Page 4: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

WHORL

• WHORL

– Ridge recurves around 2 deltas

4

Page 5: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

In Depth Classifying8-TYPES

• Looking in depth, there are really 8 basic patterns.

5

Page 6: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

LOOP-In Depth• LOOP-the ridges flow inward and then recurve in the direction of the origin. --A single delta type divergence must be present in front of the recurving ridges

• Radial Loop-Ridges flow from the recurve toward the radius or thumb side of the hand (approximately 5% of all fingerprint patterns)

• Ulnar Loop-Friction ridges flow from and recurve toward the ulna or little finger side of the hand, (Approximately 60% of all fingerprint patterns)“PU”

6

Radial Loop

Ulnar Loop

Page 7: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

ARCH-In Depth• ARCH-Ridges enter on one side of the impression and tend to flow out the other side with a rise in the center

• Plain Arch-Ridges enter, wave or rise and exit smoothly

• Tented Arch-Ridges in the center thrust upward to give an appearance similar to a tent. Inside angle is smaller than 90 degrees

• Both types of arches comprise about 6% of all fingerprint patterns 7

Plain Arch

Tented Arch

Page 8: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

WHORL-In Depth• WHORL-At least two delta type divergences are present with recurving ridges in front of each. (whorls comprise approximately 29% of all fingerprint patterns)

• Plain Whorl-One or more ridges form a complete revolution around the center (2 deltas)

Central Pocket Loop Whorl- Some ridges form a loop pattern which recurves and surrounds a central whorl (1 delta) 8

Plain Whorl

Central PocketLoop Whorl

Page 9: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

Additional Types

• Double Loop-Two separate loops are present, which sometimes surround each other. Sometimes called Double Loop Whorl (ying / yang)

• Accidental-Any pattern which does not conform to any of the previous patterns

9

Double Loop

Accidental

Page 10: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

BEYOND THE PATTERN

FINGERPRINT INDIVIDUALIZATION

Page 11: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

RIDGE ENDING BIFURCATION

LAKE or ENCLOSURE DOT or ISLAND

INDEPENDENT RIDGE SPUR

BRIDGE or CROSSOVER11

Page 12: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

BIFURCATION

12

Page 13: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

SPUR

13

Page 14: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

RIDGE ENDING

14

Page 15: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

BRIDGE

or

CROSSOVER

15

Page 16: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

LAKE

or ENCLOSURE

16

Page 17: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

DOT or ISLAND

INDEPENDENT

RIDGE

17

Page 18: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

• Just the presence of these minutia does not individualize a print

• It is the exact type of minutia as well as the minutia location that individualizes a print

• NO TWO PRINTS HAVE EVER BEEN FOUND TO HAVE THE SAME MINUTIA IN THE SAME PLACE

• Therefore, you can conclude if you are comparing two prints, and they do have the same markings in the same place you must be looking at the same print

What next...

18

Page 19: INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING Classification 1 Authors: Veon and OBoyle 2007

So how many correlations prove a match?• It was in 1918 when Edmond Locard wrote that if 12 points

(Galton's Details) were the same between two fingerprints, it would suffice as a positive identification. This is where the often quoted (12 points) originated.

• Be aware though, there is "NO" required number of points necessary for an identification.

• Some countries have set their own standards which do include a minimum number of points, but not in the United States.

• Most agencies intentionally vary the number of correlations to avoid a standard or pattern

19