introduction to fingerprinting classification 1 authors: veon and oboyle 2007
TRANSCRIPT
INTRODUCTION TO FINGERPRINTING
Classification
1
Authors: Veon and O’Boyle 2007
LOOP• LOOPS
– Comes in– Recurves– Goes back
out same side
– Usually curving around a delta
2
ARCH
• ARCH– In one side– Rises– Falls– Goes out
the other side
3
WHORL
• WHORL
– Ridge recurves around 2 deltas
4
In Depth Classifying8-TYPES
• Looking in depth, there are really 8 basic patterns.
5
LOOP-In Depth• LOOP-the ridges flow inward and then recurve in the direction of the origin. --A single delta type divergence must be present in front of the recurving ridges
• Radial Loop-Ridges flow from the recurve toward the radius or thumb side of the hand (approximately 5% of all fingerprint patterns)
• Ulnar Loop-Friction ridges flow from and recurve toward the ulna or little finger side of the hand, (Approximately 60% of all fingerprint patterns)“PU”
6
Radial Loop
Ulnar Loop
ARCH-In Depth• ARCH-Ridges enter on one side of the impression and tend to flow out the other side with a rise in the center
• Plain Arch-Ridges enter, wave or rise and exit smoothly
• Tented Arch-Ridges in the center thrust upward to give an appearance similar to a tent. Inside angle is smaller than 90 degrees
• Both types of arches comprise about 6% of all fingerprint patterns 7
Plain Arch
Tented Arch
WHORL-In Depth• WHORL-At least two delta type divergences are present with recurving ridges in front of each. (whorls comprise approximately 29% of all fingerprint patterns)
• Plain Whorl-One or more ridges form a complete revolution around the center (2 deltas)
Central Pocket Loop Whorl- Some ridges form a loop pattern which recurves and surrounds a central whorl (1 delta) 8
Plain Whorl
Central PocketLoop Whorl
Additional Types
• Double Loop-Two separate loops are present, which sometimes surround each other. Sometimes called Double Loop Whorl (ying / yang)
• Accidental-Any pattern which does not conform to any of the previous patterns
9
Double Loop
Accidental
BEYOND THE PATTERN
FINGERPRINT INDIVIDUALIZATION
RIDGE ENDING BIFURCATION
LAKE or ENCLOSURE DOT or ISLAND
INDEPENDENT RIDGE SPUR
BRIDGE or CROSSOVER11
BIFURCATION
12
SPUR
13
RIDGE ENDING
14
BRIDGE
or
CROSSOVER
15
LAKE
or ENCLOSURE
16
DOT or ISLAND
INDEPENDENT
RIDGE
17
• Just the presence of these minutia does not individualize a print
• It is the exact type of minutia as well as the minutia location that individualizes a print
• NO TWO PRINTS HAVE EVER BEEN FOUND TO HAVE THE SAME MINUTIA IN THE SAME PLACE
• Therefore, you can conclude if you are comparing two prints, and they do have the same markings in the same place you must be looking at the same print
What next...
18
So how many correlations prove a match?• It was in 1918 when Edmond Locard wrote that if 12 points
(Galton's Details) were the same between two fingerprints, it would suffice as a positive identification. This is where the often quoted (12 points) originated.
• Be aware though, there is "NO" required number of points necessary for an identification.
• Some countries have set their own standards which do include a minimum number of points, but not in the United States.
• Most agencies intentionally vary the number of correlations to avoid a standard or pattern
19