introduction to game theory - adam brandenburger

14
Introduction to Game Theory: Game Trees Version 10/29/17

Upload: others

Post on 08-Dec-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

IntroductiontoGameTheory:GameTrees

Version10/29/17

Page 2: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 2

ASecond“Non-Cooperative”GameModel

Thegametreeisamodelspecifyingwhichplayermovesfirstandwhatpossiblemovesareavailabletothatplayer;whichplayermovesnextandwhatmovesareavailabletothatplayer;andsoon

Alsospecifiedistheinformationavailabletoeachplayerateachofthecontingenciesunderwhichthatplayermightneedtochooseamove

Thisinformationismadeupofanyinformationtheplayerhasaboutpreviousmovesmadebyotherplayers(andbyhimself,ifwewanttoallowforlimitedmemory)andaboutpreviousmovesbyNature(i.e.,chancemoves)

Page 3: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 3

Tic-Tac-ToeRevisited(SymmetrizedGameTree)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tic-tac-toe-game-tree.svg

Page 4: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 4

DefinitionofaStrategy

Astrategy foraplayerspecifies,ateachnode(later:informationset)thatbelongstothatplayer,aparticularmove

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tic-tac-toe-game-tree.svg

A particular strategy for the second mover

Page 5: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 5

EndpointsandOutcomes

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tic-tac-toe-game-tree.svg

Anendpoint

Anoutcome

Ann’spayoff Bob’spayoffWhatifpayoffsarenot‘transparent’totheplayers?Soon!

Page 6: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 6

SimplifiedPoker

Amove(ormoves)byNaturecanbeusedtoexpandtheapplicabilityofthegame-treemodel

�� Ann

Naturepickseachbranchwithprobability1/4

Bet Drop

Aninformationset

�AA AK KKKA

¢

Ann

Bet Drop

� �

K = KingA = AceK = KingA = Ace

Bet Drop Bet Drop

� �Bob Bob

Call Fold Call Fold Call Fold Call Fold

http://slideplayer.com/slide/6274988/

Page 7: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 7

CaseStudy:APolitical‘Game’

Lyndon Johnson was in Houston on February 23 [1937] … when he suddenly saw, on a park bench, a copy of the Houston Post with the banner headline: CONGRESSMAN JAMES P. BUCHANAN OF BRENHAM DIES. He knew at once, he was to recall, that “this was my chance….”

From: TheYearsofLyndonJohnson:ThePathtoPower,byRobertCaro,Vintage,1990,pp.389-399;photofromhttps://media1.britannica.com/eb-media/18/126018-004-EC84F13F.jpg

A strategy, money, an organization --- these would give this unknown candidate [Johnson] a slim chance of victory against every opponent but one. Against that one opponent, nothing could give him a chance. Nothing could offset the sentimental appeal of a vote for Old Buck’s [Buchanan’s] widow.... And it began to look as if she was going to run…. So Lyndon Johnson went … and asked his father’s advice. Sam Johnson [Lyndon’s father] didn’t even have to think before giving it. Recalls Lyndon’s brother: “Lyndon started saying he was thinking of waiting to see what she [Mrs. Buchanan] does, and Daddy says, “Goddammit, Lyndon, you never learn anything about politics.” Lyndon says, “What do you mean?”

Page 8: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 8

CaseStudyCont’d:TwoGameTrees

�B

J

Bwins(afterafight)

Bwins

Run Don’t

Run Don’t�J

Jwins Thirdplayerwins

Run Don’t�

�J

B

Bwins(afterafight)

J wins

Run Don’t

Run Don’t�B

B wins Thirdplayerwins

Run Don’t

Page 9: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 9

CaseStudyCont’d:BackwardInduction

�B

J

Bwins(afterafight)

Bwins

Run Don’t

Run Don’t�J

Jwins Thirdplayerwins

Run Don’t�

�J

B

Bwins(afterafight)

J wins

Run Don’t

Run Don’t�B

B wins Thirdplayerwins

Run Don’t

Page 10: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 10

TheBackward-InductionAlgorithm

• Startatfinaldecisionnodes--- i.e.,atdecisionnodesthatleadonlytoterminalnodesofthetree

• Selectthebestchoicefortherelevantplayerateachofthesenodesandreplacethenodeswiththeresultingpayoffs(toalltheplayers)

• Repeatthisprocessontheprunedtree

• Theprocessendswhenitreachestherootofthetree

Page 11: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 11Rosenthal,R.,“GamesofPerfectInformation,PredatoryPricing,andtheChainStore,”JournalofEconomicTheory,1980,25,92-100;McKelvey,R.,andT.Palfrey,“AnExperimentalStudyoftheCentipedeGame,”1992,Econometrica,60,803-836;http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stick_Figure.jpg

$2$1

Out

$1$4

Out

$4$3

Out

• • •

$17$20

Out Out

In

$20$19

$19$22

InIn

$3$6

Out

�� � � � �In In In

Ann Bob

TheCentipedeGame

Whatdoesthebackward-inductionalgorithmyieldinthistree?

Page 12: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 12

SomeGameTreeTerminologyandFacts

Agametreehasperfect (respectively,imperfect)informationifeveryinformationsetis(respectively,isnot)asingleton

Thebackward-inductionalgorithmappliestoperfect-informationtrees

Agamematrixcanbeviewedasaparticular(‘simultaneous-move’)tree

(Advancedtopicwewillnotpursuehere:Everytreecanbemappedtoa(perhaps,big)matrix,so,what,atadeeperlevel,istherelationshipbetweenthesetwotypesofmodel?)

Y X

X

Ya b

Ann

Bob

α β

c

γ

d

δ�

Ann

Bob

X Y

X XY Y

Page 13: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 13

GameswithUncertaintyAboutPayoffs(akaBayesianorIncomplete-InformationGames)

IfNaturechoosesthebranchlabeledwithprobabilityp,thenBobgetsapayoffof0whenAnnchoosesLandhechoosesr

IfNaturechoosesthebranchlabeledwithprobability1−p,thenBobgetsapayoffof3whenAnnchoosesLandhechoosesr

ThekeyisthatwhenAnngetstomoveLorR,shedoesnotknowwhichareBob’spayoffs

Bob

22

00

11

L R

l r�

Bob

22

03

11

L R

l* r*

Ann

¢

(p) (1−p)

Page 14: Introduction to Game Theory - Adam Brandenburger

10/29/178:59PM 14

ForwardInduction

FirmA hasthepossibilityof(irrecoverably)pre-investingafractiona oftheupfrontinvestmentF neededtoenterthemarket

(Advancedtopicwewillnotpursuehere:Whatisaformalmethodofanalysisthatcapturesforward-inductionreasoning?)

Out In

In

Out 0

0

0

1

1

0

−F

−F Firm A

Firm B Out In

In

Out −aF

0

−aF

1

1

0

−F

−F Firm A

Firm B

! Firm A

No Pre-invest