introduction to quantum & computational chemistry for...
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to Quantum & Computational Chemistry
for Electronically Excited StatesLecture 4
(visit http://www.lcpp.bgsu.edu)
Target: Computer simulations are employed to study the structure and reactivity of single molecules and molecular systems (molecule in solution on in a macromolecular cavity).
Tools: We need a series of software technologies to describe the electronic and geometrical structure of molecules and their time evolution.
hν B
A
Conical Intersection (CI) or“Photochemical Funnel”A*
Excited State
Ground State
Photochemical Reaction Path
Minimum Energy Paths
Energy
Reaction Coordinate
CI
Ground StateExcited State
hν
A*
BA
1966 Zimmerman, 1972 Michl
TS
B
A
CI A*
B
A
Transition Vector (X 1) Branching (or g-h) plane (X1, X2)Stationary Point Singularity
One Product One or More Product
X1
X1X2
Photochemical Reaction Path
νh
254 nmliquid stateunder N2
benzvalene
Benzene Photochemistry
(q.y. 0.02)(e.g. Turro 1986)
(primary) (secondary)(excited state)
prefulvene
Ground state diradical intermediate
N of absorbed photonsN of photoproduct molecules
This conical intersection defines the "prefulvene" path
2.0 Å
1.4 Å
1.4 Å
ground stateallyl radical
Benzene Conical Intersection: Structure
half-broken bond
unpaired electrons
The wavefunction (electronic structure) does not change when passing through the CI.
diradical
Energy
Reaction Coordinate
CI
Ground StateExcited State
ΨAΨB
Kekule
Benzene Conical Intersection:Branching Space
X2= δ
δqψ1 ψ2X1 = δ( E − E )
δ q12
Benzene Conical Intersection:Branching Space
Gradient Difference
(fastest escape from energy degeneracy)
Derivative Coupling
(fastest change in the electronic structure)
Benzene Conical Intersection: Wavefunction
x1 x2
A consequence of the Geometric Phase theorem: the wavefunction (and bonding) changes sign along a loop that contains the intersection !
coupled electrons
coupled electrons
coupled electrons
Benzene Conical Intersection: the branching space
χ
3
1
x1
x2-x1-x2
x1
x2-x1
-x2
χ
1
3
31
Branching space diagram
unstable
unstable
π12
π2π32π4 S1
M*π12
π21π3
1π4 S2
π12
π22π3π4 S0 S0 σ1
2 π1
2π2σ2
S1 σ12
π1π22σ2
the first computations: 1969 Van der Lugt and Oosteroff and 1975 Devaquet et al. found that the point of return to the ground state (M*) is an energy minimum.
A bit of History
Avoded crossing
Cs symmetry
Suggests that the non-crossing rule applies not only to diatomic but also to polyatomic molecules
interpolated and symmetric reaction coordinate
State correlationdiagram
Slow decay (Fermi Golden Rule - coupling of vibrational states)
2A1
1B2
1A1
νh
E. Teller Isr. J. Chem. 7, 227, 1969
“…in a polyatomic molecule the non-crossing rule, which is rigorously valid for diatomics, fails and two electronic states, even if they have the same symmetry, are allowed to cross at a conical intersection..”.
“…radiationless decay from the upper to the lower intersecting state occurs within a single vibrational period when the system “travels” in the vicinity of such intersection points…”
A bit of History
H.C. Longuet-Higgins, “The Intersection of Potential Energy Surfaces in Polyatomic Molecules”, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A., 344, 147-156, 1975
“…thereby disposing of a recent claim that the non-crossing rule for diatomic molecules applies also to polyatomic molecules...”.
Ultrafast deactivation channels are not consistent with stable M* intermediate.
Energy
Reaction Coordinate
CI
Ground StateExcited State
hν
A*
B
A
Photophysics of octatetraene
hν’
1966, Howard Zimmerman
1970, Josef Michl
1974, Lionel Salem
A bit of History
Zimmerman, Michl and Salem were the first to suggest that, in photochemical organic reactions, the point of return M* may correspond to a conical intersection. Zimmerman and Michl call it photochemical funnel.
1982-1988 CASSCF Gradients of the Excited State Energy (Robb, Bernardi, Schlegel and Olivucci). Structure Predicted from Valence Bond Theory
1990 First Conical Intersection “Detected” for the Ethylene Dimerization (Bernardi, Olivucci, Robb). Computation is carried out on the CRAY-XMP in London.
1.47 Å
2.17 Å
2.08 Å
1990-2000: 25 different organic chromophores undergoing 16 different reactions
A bit of History
“statistical” demonstration using quantum chemistry
allow to draw guess structures (eg for pericyclic reactions) !
allow the use optimization methods (eg pseudo Newton-Raphson)
0.0
40
20
0
2A1
1B2
1A1
hν
real crossing between states of the same (A1) symmetry
A bit of History
First application of ab initio CASPT2//CASSCF: s-cis buta-1,3-diene J. Chem. Phys. 1995
excited state minimum energy path
S1
M*S2
S0 S0
S2
Cs symmetry
2A1
1B2 S2
1A1
S1/S0
S2/S1
S1/S0
S2/S1
νh
S1
S0
CI
π12
π2π32π4 S1
M*
Symmetry Based Coordinate
π12
π21π3
1π4 S2
π12
π22π3π4 S0 S0 σ1
2 π1
2π2σ2
S2 σ12
π11π2
1σ2
S1 σ12
π1π22σ2
Gradient Based Coordinate
the van der Lugt and Oosteroff result is consistent with the existence of a conical intersection at the bottom of the S1 energy surfaces
A bit of History
FC
νh
B
A
A*
Computational Tools
Conical InterersectionOptimization (CIO)
Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate (IRC)
Initial Relaxation Direction (IRD)
Energy Minimumand Transition StateOptimization
Trajectory (Classicalor Semi-classical)
2008
“…the use of computational methods to elucidate reaction mechanisms has not really made a major impact on the way in which organic photochemist think about such mechanisms …”
6.13 Some Important and Unique Properties of Conical Intersections
6.12 The Non-Crossing Rule and Its Violations: Conical Intersections and their Visualization
6.30 Concerted Photochemical Pericyclic Reactions and Conical Intersections
5.6 Conical Intersections near Zero-Order Surface Crossings
1990
Photochemical Reaction Path in Textbooks
Turro, N. J. (1990). J. Photochem. Photobiol., A: Chemistry 51 63.
MOLECULAR AND ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE OF THE CROSSING: NATURE OF THE PHOTOCHEMICAL FUNNEL
EXCITED STATE REACTION PATHS: EXCITED STATE DECAY
GROUND STATE RELAXATION PATHS: PHOTOPRODUCT SELECTIVITY
TRAJECTORIES: REACTION TIME SCALES AND QUANTUM YIELDS
Computational Photochemistry
almost routine
feasible !
still unpractical or impossible
wavefunction/density (orbital occupancies)
branching plane
equilibrium geometries,transition states and minimum energy paths
Newton equations of motion
optimization of a singularity
S1
M*
S0 S0
S2
2A1
1B2 S2
1A1
S1/S0
S2/S1S1
M*
S0 S0
S2
2A1
1B2
S2
1A1
S1/S0
Avoided Crossing rule valid !
Avoided Crossing rule invalid
Avoided Crossingrule invalid
Different Electronic States =Different Conical Intersection Structure =
Different Chemistry
- +
+(π π*)2 π π*
Hydrocarbons Schiff bases
S1
νh νh
NH2 NH2+
σ-Bond Making
σ-Bond Breaking
C
Group (or σ-Bond) Exchange
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Bond-Making, Bond Breaking and Group Transfer
1
3
6
1
6
3
Polyenes (and polyene radicals)
Benzene Cyclohexadienes
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Conjugated Hydrocarbons
1.4 1.42.0
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11584-11585
Crossing between the ground state and a (π-π*) doubly excited state
S1
S0 ππ∗
ππ∗
E / k
cal m
ol-1
3 5 7 9
0
10
20
30
40
cyclizations
Z/E isomerization
90°
Selectivity may be due to differences in energy
S1
S0
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Conjugated Hydrocarbons
NH2 (+)1
23
45
NH2 (+)
trans
1
23
45
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Protonated Schiff Bases
cis
Cis Form
Light
Retinal Rhodopsin
Trans Form
NH+1111NH+
(Appears in ca. 200 fs)
- +
1.46 Å
1.40 Å
1.38 Å
1.33 Å
1.38 Å
90°
e-+
Crossing between the ground state and a (π-π*) singly excited state
S1
S0
ππ∗
ππ∗
hν
N+
90°
Newman projection
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Protonated Schiff Bases
X1
X2
NH2+
NH2+
+NH2
+
x1
x2
-x1
-x2
χ
NH2
NH2
N
N
Unstable (TS)
Unstable (TS)
Stretching
Motion Coupled to the Torsion
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Protonated Schiff Bases
χ
x1
x2-x1-x2
NH2
+NH2
breaks thedouble bond homolitically
+
breaks thedouble bond hetherolitically
NH2
NH2
+
NH2
+
+
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Protonated Schiff Bases
1.35
1.461.36
1.43
1.29
MEP co-ordinate (a. u.)
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.00
20
40
60
80
100
hν
1.39
1.391.46
1.42 1.3076.8
(291 nm)
91.2
1.36
1.431.42
1.43 1.30
FC
120
1.42
1.37
1.53
1.37
1.35
24.7
12.5
1.51.37 1.37
1.351.41
S1
S0
0.0
1.35
1.451.36
1.431.29
trans
180.0
S2
CI
Ener
gy (k
cal m
ol-1
)ππ∗
ππ∗
The Chemistry of Conical Intersections:Protonated Schiff Bases
HN
Cα
Cα
O
O
W2
W1
Structure of Bovine (rod) Rhodopsin
Lys296
Glu113
11 12
S. T. Menon, M. Han, T. P. Sakmar, Physiological reviews 2001, 81, 1659.
Lys296
Try265
Glu113
Low Temperature Photochromism in Bovine Rhodopsin
Rh (λmax 498 nm) bathoRh (λmax 543 nm)
580 nm irradiation at 77 K
OpsinHN
Spalink, J. D.; Reynolds, A. H.; Rentzepis, P. M.; Sperling, W.; Applebury, M. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1983, 80, 1887-1891.
-144° (all-trans)
Kukura, P.; Mc Camant, D. W.; Yoon, S.; Wandschneider, D. B.; Mathies, R. A. Science. 2005, 310, 1006-1009.
-8° (11-cis)
Verdegem, P. J. E. et al. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 11316.
HN
Opsin
0.67 q.y.
hνB
A
The Photochemical Funnel is aConical Intersection (CI)
A*
Excited State
Ground State
Zimmerman, Michl, Salem
Bernardi, F., M. Olivucci, M. A. Robb, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 321 328.
“Photochemical” Trajectories
reactive trajectory
non reactive trajectory
Q. Wang, R. W. Schoenlein, L. A. Peteanu, R. A. Mathies, C. V. Shank, Science 1994, 266, 422.
Evolution of the reactive moiety (198 vibrational degrees of freedom) embedded in the protein cavity.
V0 (R)
V1 (R)
Lys296
δε
γ
α
11
913
QM/MMSpecifically
ParametrizedMM Frontier
multiconfigurational QM
Rhodopsin (x-ray structure)
Nicolas Ferré and Massimo Olivucci Theochem, 2003 632, 71-82.
Ferré, N., Cembran, A., Garavelli, M. and Olivucci, M. Theo. Chem. Acc. 2004 112 335-341.
Ferré, N. and Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003 125, 6868-6869.
MM
Retinal chromophore
A QM/MM Protocol for Excited States
Fixed
Relaxed(< 4 Å)
HTot = HMM+HQM+HQM/MM
HQM = Te(r) + Vee(r) + Ven(r,R) + Vnn(R)
HMM = Vmm(rmm)
HQM/MM = Ve/mm(r, rmm) + Vn/mm(rmm,R)
A. Warshel, M. Levitt // Theoretical Studies of Enzymic Reactions: Dielectric, Electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. // J.Mol.Biol. 103(1976), 227-49
o
Rrmm
y
x
z
r
A QM/MM Protocol for Excited States
QM
MM
Frontier
rmm r
R
0 30 60 90 120 S0
S1
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
Frutos, L.-M., Ferré, N. Andruniow, T., Santoro, F. and Olivucci, M. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2007 104 7764.
104 fs
Ene
rgy
(kca
l mol
-1)
Time (fs)
hν (702 nm)
Scaled-CASSCF/Amber Semi-classical Trajectories
Schapiro, I., Ryazantsev, M. N., Frutos, L. M., Ferré, N., R. Lindh, R., Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011 133 3354.
50 fs
15 0 180 21 0
-144° (all-trans)HN
Opsin
OpsinHN
-8° (11-cis)
hν
bathoRh
Rh
Kakitani et al. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998 (120-170 fs)Kandori et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001 (above 100 fs)Polli et al. Nature 2010 (above 70 fs)
D. Polli, P. Altoè, O. Weingart, K. M. Spillane, C. Manzoni, D. Brida, G. Tomasello, Garavelli, M. et al., Nature 2010, 467, 440.
OpsinHN
CASSCF/Amber Semi-classical Trajectory of Rh (200 fs)
Frutos, L.-M., Ferré, N. Andruniow, T., Santoro, F. and Olivucci, M. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2007 7764-7769.
Schapiro, I., Ryazantsev, M. N., Frutos, L. M., Ferré, N., R. Lindh, R., Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011 133 3354.
CW CCW
bicycle-pedal
H H
HOOP
Evolution of the π-Electron Density of Rh
(reactive trajectory)
(Bond reconstitution)
Ener
gy
Reaction Coordinate
CI
Ground StateExcited State
hν
A*
BA
broken π-bond
Schapiro, I., Ryazantsev, M. N., Frutos, L. M., Ferré, N., R. Lindh, R., Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011 133 3354.
Evolution of the π-Electron Density of Rh
(non reactive trajectory)
(Bond reconstitution)
Ener
gyReaction Coordinate
CI
Ground StateExcited State
hν
A*
BA
broken π-bond
HN
Cε
restrained QM atomrestrained
Schapiro, I., Ryazantsev, M. N., Frutos, L. M., Ferré, N., R. Lindh, R., Olivucci, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011 133 3354.
The Mulliken’s dream
“…In conclusion, I would like to emphasize strongly my belief that the era of computing chemists, when hundreds if not thousands of chemists will go to the
computing machine instead of the laboratory for increasingly many facets of chemical information, is
already at hand…”
Robert Mulliken, Nobel Lecture, 1966
Software: Molecular Orbitals rather than Atomic Orbitals for the description of the electronic structure of molecules
Faster computations Slower computations