introduction we analyzed biomedical engineering and bioengineering undergraduate curricula in the us...

1
INTRODUCTION We analyzed biomedical engineering and bioengineering undergraduate curricula in the US at the level of courses. We were interested in the following questions: How much do biomedical engineering programs have in common? What courses are required? What domains are covered? How many credit hours are required in each domain? Does a “core” undergraduate curriculum already exist? How much room is devoted to specialization? Are accredited and non-accredited (often newer) programs different? METHODS Data were curricula of BME programs posted on university websites as being the most current information Counted required courses in engineering and biology Did not consider math, basic chemistry, physics, humanities and social science Counted identifiable courses, so might be undercounting e.g. statistics may be taught in a lab course Converted all curricula to semester credit hour system Average curriculum = 128 credit hrs 71 programs had curricula that could be characterized 40 of 42 accredited programs 31 of 38 non-accredited programs 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% TransportPhenom ena S ignals & S ystem s Instrum entation M aterials S tatistics C om puting C ircuitA nalysis B iology -N on-P hys M echanics P hysiology C urricularSubjects P ercentage ofP rogram s R equring C reditH ours BM E C reditH ours T otalC reditH ours Courses required at ~75% of accredited BME programs. Bars show fraction of programs requiring course (gray) and fraction requiring that the course be taken from BE/BME department (yellow) 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% O ther Freshm an E ngineering D esign S pecialization H ours Imaging O rganic C hem istry Modeling Therm odynam ics C urricularS ubjects P ercentage ofP rogram s R equring C reditH ours BM E C reditHours T otalC reditHours Additional courses required at accredited BME programs “Other” includes courses in Ethics, Engineering Economics, Technical Communication, etc. 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Y ear # ofProgram s Accredited Programs (ABET data) Total Programs (Date of initiation from Whitaker) Course Title Accredited % Non- Accredited % Delta (A – N) Mechanics 93% 71% 22% Thermodynamic s 63% 45% 17% Materials 78% 61% 16% Circuit Analysis 83% 71% 12% Modeling 40% 29% 11% Physiology 98% 87% 10% Imaging 15% 6% 9% Transport Phenomena 70% 68% 2% Instrumentati on 75% 74% 1% Course Title Accredited % Non- Accredited % Delta (A – N) Signals & Systems 73% 74% - 2% Statistics 78% 81% - 3% Biology non- Physiology 88% 97% - 9% Computing 78% 90% - 13% Organic Chemistry 28% 52% - 24% Courses required at accredited BME programs less frequently than at non-accredited BME programs 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 Freshm an E ngineering D esign Imaging O rganic C hem istry M odeling Therm odynam ics TransportPhenom ena S ignals & System s Instrum entation M aterials S tatistics Com puting C ircuitA nalysis B iology -N on-P hys M echanics P hysiology C urricularS ubject R equired C reditH ours B M E C reditH ours Total C reditH ours Credit hours required at accredited BME programs (mean and SD) Credit hours required at non-accredited programs (Mean and SD) 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 Freshm an E ngineering D esign Im aging M odeling Therm odynam ics O rganic C hem istry M aterials TransportPhenom ena C ircuitA nalysis M echanics S ignals & System s Instrum entation S tatistics P hysiology C om puting B iology -N on-Phys C u rricular S ubjec R equired C reditH ours BM E C reditH ours Total C reditH ours Accredited programs Non-accredited programs Mean (SD) credit hrs 12.9 7.3 12.8 6.7 25 th percentile 8 8 Median credit hrs 12 12 75 th percentile 16 18 Option Participants choosing option Students should follow a BME track emphasizing depth in a traditional engineering field 23 (29%) Students should follow a BME track emphasizing depth in a traditional engineering field (as above) or in an emerging area (e.g., cellular engineering, systems biology, tissue engineering). 26 (33%) Students should take advanced bioengineering, guided by recommended sequences, but not formalized as tracks. 17 (22%) Students should be free to choose advanced courses from bioengineering, other branches of engineering, and biology. 12 (15%) SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS There is a de facto core already, which most schools approach, but few if any match exactly. Courses in design, physiology, additional biology, mechanics, circuits, instrumentation, computing, statistics, and materials are all required by at least 75% of BE/BME accredited programs. BME has a broad core; and this matches what both industry and academia want based on survey data (not shown). Accredited and non-accredited programs have similar but not identical curricula. Beyond the core there is room for specialization. Industry should be educated about the existence of this core. Data on the BME Core Curriculum 1 Robert A. Linsenmeier and 1,2 David W. Gatchell 1 Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 2 Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL Third Biomedical Engineering Education Summit Meeting, St. Charles, IL June, 2008 Supported by NSF EEC 9876363 Required courses at accredited programs Differences between accredited and non-accredited programs Courses required at accredited BME programs more frequently than at non-accredited BME programs Specializations or Tracks beyond the core Faculty and industry responses to survey (Delphi study – round 2) Credit hours reserved for tracks or specialization courses Number of programs over time 0% 25% 50% 75% Other Tissue,Cellular& MolecularEngineering Premedicine Mechanical M aterials Science Imaging Electrical Tracks Percentage ofProgram s Non-Accredited Accredited Percentage of programs offering different kinds of tracks

Upload: vanessa-sims

Post on 31-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: INTRODUCTION We analyzed biomedical engineering and bioengineering undergraduate curricula in the US at the level of courses. We were interested in the

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed biomedical engineering and bioengineering undergraduate curricula in the US at the level of courses.

We were interested in the following questions:• How much do biomedical engineering programs have in

common?• What courses are required? What domains are covered?• How many credit hours are required in each domain?• Does a “core” undergraduate curriculum already exist?• How much room is devoted to specialization?• Are accredited and non-accredited (often newer)

programs different?

METHODS

• Data were curricula of BME programs posted on university websites as being the most current information

• Counted required courses in engineering and biology• Did not consider math, basic chemistry, physics,

humanities and social science• Counted identifiable courses, so might be undercounting

• e.g. statistics may be taught in a lab course• Converted all curricula to semester credit hour system

• Average curriculum = 128 credit hrs• 71 programs had curricula that could be characterized

• 40 of 42 accredited programs• 31 of 38 non-accredited programs

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Transport Phenomena

Signals & Systems

Instrumentation

Materials

Statistics

Computing

Circuit Analysis

Biology - Non-Phys

Mechanics

Physiology

Cu

rric

ula

r S

ub

jec

ts

Percentage of Programs Requring Credit Hours

BME Credit Hours

Total Credit Hours

Courses required at ~75% of accredited BME programs.Bars show fraction of programs requiring course (gray) and fraction

requiring that the course be taken from BE/BME department (yellow)

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Other

Freshman Engineering

Design

Specialization Hours

Imaging

Organic Chemistry

Modeling

Thermodynamics

Cu

rric

ula

r S

ub

jec

ts

Percentage of Programs Requring Credit Hours

BME Credit Hours

Total Credit Hours

Additional courses required at accredited BME programs

“Other” includes courses in Ethics, Engineering Economics, Technical Communication, etc.

0

15

30

45

60

75

90

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

# of

Pro

gram

s

Accredited Programs(ABET data)

Total Programs(Date of initiation from Whitaker)

Course Title Accredited %Non-

Accredited %Delta (A – N)

Mechanics 93% 71% 22%

Thermodynamics

63% 45% 17%

Materials 78% 61% 16%

Circuit Analysis 83% 71% 12%

Modeling 40% 29% 11%

Physiology 98% 87% 10%

Imaging 15% 6% 9%

Transport Phenomena

70% 68% 2%

Instrumentation 75% 74% 1%

Course Title Accredited %Non-

Accredited %Delta (A – N)

Signals & Systems

73% 74% - 2%

Statistics 78% 81% - 3%

Biologynon-Physiology

88% 97% - 9%

Computing 78% 90% - 13%

Organic Chemistry

28% 52% - 24%

Courses required at accredited BME programs less frequently than at non-accredited BME programs

0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00

Freshman Engineering

Design

Imaging

Organic Chemistry

Modeling

Thermodynamics

Transport Phenomena

Signals & Systems

Instrumentation

Materials

Statistics

Computing

Circuit Analysis

Biology - Non-Phys

Mechanics

Physiology

Cu

rric

ula

r S

ub

jec

t

Required Credit Hours

BME Credit Hours

Total Credit Hours

Credit hours required at accredited BME programs (mean and SD)

Credit hours required at non-accredited programs (Mean and SD)

0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00

Freshman Engineering

Design

Imaging

Modeling

Thermodynamics

Organic Chemistry

Materials

Transport Phenomena

Circuit Analysis

Mechanics

Signals & Systems

Instrumentation

Statistics

Physiology

Computing

Biology - Non-Phys

Cu

rric

ula

r S

ub

jec

t

Required Credit Hours

BME Credit Hours

Total Credit Hours

Accredited programs

Non-accredited programs

Mean (SD) credit hrs 12.9 7.3 12.8 6.7

25th percentile 8 8

Median credit hrs 12 12

75th percentile 16 18

OptionParticipants choosing

option

Students should follow a BME track emphasizing depth in a traditional engineering field 23 (29%)

Students should follow a BME track emphasizing depth in a traditional engineering field (as above) or

in an emerging area (e.g., cellular engineering, systems biology, tissue engineering).

26 (33%)

Students should take advanced bioengineering, guided by recommended sequences, but not

formalized as tracks.

17 (22%)

Students should be free to choose advanced courses from bioengineering, other branches of

engineering, and biology.12 (15%)

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

• There is a de facto core already, which most schools approach, but few if any match exactly.

• Courses in design, physiology, additional biology, mechanics, circuits, instrumentation, computing, statistics, and materials are all required by at least 75% of BE/BME accredited programs.

• BME has a broad core; and this matches what both industry and academia want based on survey data (not shown).

• Accredited and non-accredited programs have similar but not identical curricula.

• Beyond the core there is room for specialization.• Industry should be educated about the existence of

this core.

Data on the BME Core Curriculum1Robert A. Linsenmeier and 1,2David W. Gatchell

1Northwestern University, Evanston, IL2Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL

Third Biomedical Engineering Education Summit Meeting, St. Charles, IL June, 2008Supported by NSF EEC 9876363

Required courses at accredited programs

Differences between accredited and non-accredited programsCourses required at accredited BME programs more frequently than at non-accredited BME programs

Specializations or Tracks beyond the coreFaculty and industry responses to survey(Delphi study – round 2)

Credit hours reserved for tracks or specialization courses

Number of programs over time

0% 25% 50% 75%

Other

Tissue, Cellular &Molecular Engineering

Premedicine

Mechanical

Materials Science

Imaging

Electrical

Tra

cks

Percentage of Programs

Non-Accredited

Accredited

Percentage of programs offering different kinds of tracks