investigating galaxy evolution with empirical population synthesis

33
Investigating Galaxy Investigating Galaxy Evolution with Empirical Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis Population Synthesis Laerte Sodré Jr. Departamento de Astronomia Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas Universidade de São Paulo Challenges of New Physics in Space Campos do Jordão, 25 – 30 April 2009

Upload: lonato

Post on 12-Jan-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Investigating Galaxy Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis. Laerte Sodré Jr. Departamento de Astronomia Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas Universidade de São Paulo Challenges of New Physics in Space Campos do Jordão, 25 – 30 April 2009. log [OIII] / H b. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

Investigating Galaxy Evolution Investigating Galaxy Evolution with Empirical Population with Empirical Population

SynthesisSynthesis

Laerte Sodré Jr.Departamento de Astronomia

Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas Universidade de São Paulo

Challenges of New Physics in SpaceCampos do Jordão, 25 – 30 April 2009

Page 2: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

2

SEAGal Collaboration(Semi-Empirical Analysis of Galaxies)

• Roberto Cid Fernandes (Florianópolis)• Grazyna Stasinska (Meudon)• LSJ (SP)• Abílio Mateus (SP, Florianópolis)

+ several PhD students:• Natalia Asari (Florianópolis, Meudon)• Juan Torres-Papaqui (INAOE, Florianópolis)• William Schoenell (Florianópolis)• Jean M. Gomes (Florianópolis)• Luis Vega Neme (Córdoba)• Tiago F. Triumpho (SP)• Marcus V. Costa Duarte (SP)• ...

• Cid Fernandes et al., 2005; Sodré et al. 2006; Mateus et al., 2006; Stasinska et al., 2006; Mateus et al., 2007; Cid Fernandes et al., 2007; Asari et al. 2008; Stasinska et al. 2008

log [NII] / H

log

[OII

I] /

H

Page 3: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

3

some questions about galaxy evolution:

• how star formation evolved?

• how metallicity evolved?

• what is the role played by galaxy mass?

• ...

Page 4: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

4

some questions about galaxy evolution:

• how star formation evolved?

• how metallicity evolved?

• what is the role played by galaxy mass?

• ...

• these are examples of problems that can be addressed by spectral synthesis

Page 5: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

5

Empirical Population Synthesis

• Fitting of a set of observables of a given galaxy by means of a linear combination of simpler systems of known characteristics, like individual stars or Simple Stellar Populations (SSP) to recover galaxy properties

Page 6: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

6

Why spectral synthesis?

• SS allows to retrieve the stellar history of galaxies from galaxy spectra

• galaxy spectrum: encodes information on the age and metallicity distributions of the constituent stars

• it is an expression of the galaxy star-formation and chemical history

Page 7: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

7

what is a galaxy spectrum?• energy flux per

wavelength interval

• continuum + absorption lines: stars

• emission lines: ionized gasproduced by star-forming regions or AGNs

Page 8: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

8

Why spectral synthesis?

• SS provides information on:

- Stellar population mix – galaxy history: star-formation, metallicity

- Gas properties – ionizing source: stars x AGN

- Kinematics & Dust – σ* , AV

Page 9: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

9

Model spectrum

Mλ0: synthetic flux at the normalization wavelength λ0 = 4020A

b j,λ: spectrum of the j-th SSP normalized at λ0

(N* SSP)

x j: fractional contribution of the j-th SSP to the model flux at λ0

reddening term (foreground dust): rλ = dex[-0.4(Aλ-Aλ0)](Cardelli, Clayton & Mathis 1989)

Gaussian with dispersion σ*

our approach: code Starlight – chi2 fitting

Page 10: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

10

Spectral base (B&C03):• N* = 45-150 SSP

• 3-6 metallicities

0.2, 1, 2.5 Zsun

(+ 0.005, 0.02, 0.4)

• 15 - 25 ages 0.001 to 13 Gyr (now: up to 18 Gyr)

STELIB library + Padova (1994) tracks + Chabrier (2003) IMF

Page 11: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

11

The SDSS sample

• SDSS: enormous amount of good quality, homogeneously obtained spectra

• Data from DR2 to DR7

samples from 20,000 to ~1,000,000 galaxies

• Median S/N ~14 (range 5 – 30)

Page 12: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

12

Examples:

Observed spectrum, model spectrum, error spectrum, masked pixels

Page 13: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

13

Page 14: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

14

Emission line measurements

• Emission lines are measured from the “pure emission”, residual spectra

• Intensities are computed for many lines

• Galaxies with emission lines are classified according to their position in the BPT diagram ([OIII]/Hβ x [NII]/Hα):

- normal star-forming galaxies

- AGNs

Page 15: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

15

Empirical relations(useful to constrain models and for sanity checks)

relation between the meanstellar metallicity and thenebular metallicity

[O/H]: “empirical methods”(= Tremonti et al. 2004)

Page 16: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

16

Empirical relations

relation between velocitydispersion and stellar mass

Page 17: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

17

Empirical relations

AV (Balmer) ~ 2 AV (Stellar)

Page 18: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

18

Bimodality of the galaxy population

sequence x bimodality

“Early and late, in spite of their temporal connotations, appear to be the most convenient adjectives available for describing relative positions in the sequence”

(Hubble 1926)

• SDSS: Strateva et al. (2001), Kauffmann et al. (2003), ...

• Here: Mateus et al. (2006) * Volume limited sample (M(r) < -20.5)* ~50,000 galaxies (DR2)

Page 19: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

19

Bimodality of the galaxy population• Many galaxy properties present a bimodal

distribution: early-type / late-type • AGN hosts: preference for passive populations, but

everywhere

Page 20: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

20

Bimodality of the galaxy population

• The mean light-weighted stellar age provides a better separation between classes than stellar mass

Page 21: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

21

Galaxy downsizing

• Massive galaxies stoped to form stars more than 10 Gyr ago

• Galaxies forming stars today tend to have low masses

Page 22: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

22

A nature via nurture scenario for galaxy evolution

• Light (SF) is more sensitive to environment than stellar mass

Page 23: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

23

A nature via nurture scenario for galaxy evolution

• Galaxies in dense environments are older and more massive

Page 24: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

24

A nature via nurture scenario for galaxy evolution

• Galaxies in dense environments have more metals

Page 25: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

25

A nature via nurture scenario for galaxy evolution

• PCA: <log t>L log M* log Σ10 log Lr M* /Lr

• Most of the variance in galaxy properties are due to 1) environment and 2) age

• Galaxy evolution is accelerated in denser environments

• Galaxy evolution is accelerated for higher masses

• “Nature” necessarily acts via “nurture” effects (c.f. Abilio)

Page 26: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

26

Chemical enrichment and mass-assembly histories of SF galaxies

Bins inZneb

Cid Fernandes et al. (2007), Asari et al. (2007)

Page 27: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

27

Page 28: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

28

Chemical enrichment and mass-assembly histories of SF galaxies

mass

Z

Page 29: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

29

Chemical enrichment and mass-assembly histories of SF galaxies

• Cid Fernandes et al. (2007), Asari et al. (2007):

- Low Zneb galaxies are slow in forming stars and reached Z* ~1/3 Zsun in the last ~100 Myr

- High Zneb galaxies formed most of their stars long ago, reaching Z* ~1 Zsun several Gyr ago

- Actually, more evidence of downsizing

Page 30: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

30

-bands not fitted in massive ellipticals ... new models will fix this!H–missfit with STELIB ... MILES fixes this!

Ellipticals SF-galaxies

technical challenges:

Residuals ~ within errors, but systematic!

Page 31: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

31

What changes with the new spectral bases???

Refits using CB07 models(MILES + Martins libraries)

2003

2007

2003 2007

SF-galaxies

Ellipticals

Residuals are smallerie., spectral fits are better!!

SFHs are smoother

Mean ages decrease a bit

<Z> increase a bit

Page 32: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

32

new surveys

• SDSS/DR7

• new photometric callibration!

• ~1,000,000 galaxies

• ... more to come!

EUCLID, WFMOS, ...

Page 33: Investigating Galaxy  Evolution with Empirical Population Synthesis

33

some scientific challenges:

• uncertain stages of stellar evolution

• downsizing

• initial mass function

• chemical evolution

• dust evolution

• ...