investigating popular water models albert defusco, ken jordan center for molecular and materials...

21
Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco , Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Upload: cory-thompson

Post on 04-Jan-2016

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Investigating Popular Water

ModelsAlbert DeFusco, Ken Jordan

Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Page 2: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

What are we modeling?

Page 3: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

• ElectrostaticsInteraction of charge densities

• PolarizationDistortions of charge density of one monomer due to the electric field from other monomers

• Exchange / RepulsionShort range interactions

• DispersionLong range interactions

Making Simple Models

Page 4: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Overview

Elec.Elec. Pol.Pol. Rep.Rep. Disp.Disp.

DCDC ChargesSingle dipole

Oxygen: Lennard-Jones

TTM2-RTTM2-R Charges(damped)

Distributed dipoles

Oxygen: R12,R10,R6

AMOEBAAMOEBA MultipolesDistributed

dipolesAll atom Buffered 14-7

DPPDPP ChargesDistributed

DipolesAll atom

exponentialOxygen:

damped R6

Page 5: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Difference PlotsPoint Charges

•compared to MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ

๏ E(DPP)-E(MP2)

Page 6: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Difference PlotsPoint Charges

•compared to MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ๏ E(DPP)-E(MP2)

•large region of difference๏ Two out-of-plane regions

where “lone pair electrons” may reside

Page 7: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Difference PlotsMultipoles

•charge, dipole, quadrupole from MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ calculation

•compared to MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ

๏ E(GDMA)-E(MP2)

Page 8: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Difference PlotsMultipoles

•Very close to MP2

•Can be expensive to implement

Page 9: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Polarizationby induced dipoles

• Induced dipole is the most popular method

•Single site๏ tends to underpolarize

•Distributed polarizability๏ must be damped at short range

•Can be compared to 3-body energies

Page 10: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Polarization EnergySingle site: underpolarized

distributed: over damped

Page 11: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

3-body Decompositionwater hexamer isomers

Page 12: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

3-body Decompositionwater hexamer isomers

Page 13: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

3-body Decompositionwater hexamer isomers

Page 14: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

3-body Decompositionwater hexamer isomers

DPP has only point-charges!DPP has only point-charges!

Page 15: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Repulsion/Dispersion

•Typically just oxygens are allowed to interact๏ Dang-Chang and TTM2-R

•Using all atoms allows for greater geometric flexibility๏ AMOEBA and DPP

Page 16: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Relaxed flap anglesInteraction energy

θd

θa

Page 17: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Relaxed versus fixed

Page 18: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Distributed Point Polarizable Model•Point charges

๏ undamped interaction allows for charge-penetration-like effects

•Distributed induced dipoles๏ improves 3-body interactions

•Repulsion / Dispersion๏ all-atom repulsion

๏ damped R6 dispersion

Page 19: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Acknowledgments

•The Jordan Group

•Dr. Thomas Sommerfeld

•Dr. Daniel Schofield

•Jun Cui

•Valerie McCarthy

Page 20: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Distributed Multipoles

• Based on Stone’s Generalized Distributed Multipole Analysis (GDMA)๏ Point-moment expansion

from ab initio density

• AMOEBA๏ Up to quadrupole on each

atom

๏ scaled to fix dimer geometry

q,µ,Θq,µ,Θ

q,µ,Θq,µ,Θ q,µ,Θq,µ,Θ

Page 21: Investigating Popular Water Models Albert DeFusco, Ken Jordan Center for Molecular and Materials Simulations

Point Charges

• Reproduce experimental dipole

๏ 1.85 Debye

• Negative charge on the M-site

๏ 0.2 Å towards the hydrogens

q+q+q+q+

µµ

2q–2q–