investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the lhc

22
Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC Igor Yazynin Institute for High Energy Physics (Protvino, Russia) Acknowledgements: AB-ABP Collimation working group, collaboration UA9.

Upload: trey

Post on 20-Mar-2016

49 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC. Igor Yazynin Institute for High Energy Physics (Protvino, Russia). Acknowledgements: AB-ABP Collimation working group, collaboration UA9. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation

in the LHC

Igor YazyninInstitute for High Energy Physics (Protvino, Russia)

Acknowledgements: AB-ABP Collimation working group, collaboration UA9.

Page 2: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Outline

• The use of crystal (channeling effect) with optimal collimator gaps.

• The estimation inefficiency of beam cleaning system from any factors was considered.

• The possible variants of application the crystalline targets for beam cleaning in LHC were investigated.

Page 3: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Principal sketch of beam cleaning system

Main collimation systems in LHC:• Betatron cleaning (IR7), (Momentum cleaning (IR3)).

• 6 main radiation sources at 4 systems ( R,Z, and 2 skew).In the Pic. of angular beam distribution we can see 6 sources.

With using crystalline target the distribution of scattering beam changes -> efficiency changes and defined how particles put on collimators.

For decreasing losses may optimize size of gaps. The channeling fraction must be put only one absorber(collimator).

Page 4: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

• Beam sizes and traces protons from crystal for two energies.

Page 5: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Calculation inefficiency of system

R0,mm Z0,mm η0% η1% η2%

1.7 0.0 0.091 0.112 0.098

0 - absolutely secondary collimators1- carbon secondary collimators (phase 1)2 - secondary + tertiary (W) collimators (phase 2)

• First coefficient defined losses only from primary collimators • Losses from secondary collimators • Part losses catch by tertiary collimators • From table we can see that main losses at E=7T defined by particles

escaping from PC.

Collision energy E=7000 GeV, R0’=-0.023 mrad, Impact parameters dR=0.3 um

%091.00 pc%021.001 sc

%014.021 tc

Page 6: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Using channeling effect at LHCin case of phase 1

1 2Fig.1: Angular beam distribution with any orientation of crystal 1-3:

4-images of collimator edges (V=1m/turn, E= 7TeV, R=80m)Bend angle of crystal = 50 urad for case of phase 1 (sizes of collimator gaps).Crystal stand in place of primary collimator and deflect in radial plane.

Fig2.: Inefficiency versus alignment(orientation) of crystal. (E=7 TeV) • Increase efficiency of system in ~10 times• Range of good efficiency -20.5:-23.5 urad.

rad 18,26,220

Page 7: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Using channeling effect at LHCin case of some changing gaps

• Beam distribution on the collimator TCSGb5 and orientation curve for channeling fraction.

• Bend angle of crystal (Si110) = 30 urad, gap of collimator=2mm• Beam size at crystal Rb=1.64mm, Zb=1.23mm

Page 8: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Choice of curve radius

1 2 • 1 - Channeling fraction from curve radius.• 2 – Losses on the crystal, Bend angle of crystal = 30 urad.• Optimum curve radius R~ 70-90 m, length = 2.1-2.7 mm• For energy 7TeV critical radius Rcrit =11.7m, critical ang.

=2.47urad

Page 9: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Phase plane of beam on the collimator TSCb5

1 2 • 1 – Optimal orientation (Angle = -22 urad) (R~ 70m, length = 2.1mm).• 2 – Bad orientation (Angle = 0 urad).• Density of beam on the edge of collimator decrease in ~1000 times• Losses on the crystal = 0.25% (losses on primary collim. ~50%)• Efficiency of collimation system increase in 50-100 times

Page 10: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Global inefficiency of system P=7TeV

• Orientation curve of full proton losses in accelerator for some curve radiuses of crystal. Bend angle = 30 urad.

• Minimum losses is in case R=70m, Ig=0.002%,That in ~ 50 times smaller than usual collimation.

Page 11: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Efficiency of system P=450GeV

1 2• 1 - Orientation curves for channeling fraction I_ch an for losses on

collimator TSGb5 (R = 10m, length = 1.4 mm). • 2 - Orientation curves of global losses and losses on the crystal.• Minimum losses is in case Angle=-95urad, Ig=0.0004%,That in 100 times smaller than usual collimation.

Page 12: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Investigation influence of crystal none perfection on the efficiency of system.

• Thickness of amorphous layer,• Skew parameter (torsion)• Miscut parameter,• Twist parameter(for strip crystal),• Surface parameter,• Offset and optimal position of elements.

Page 13: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

• Efficiency of ideal crystal system• Collimat. Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich%• Real 99.1615 0.1510 0.2580 0.00225 98.71• Absol. 99.3768 0.0868 0.2553 0.00100 98.92• Extraction efficiency defined Iout = Isc –I1mm will consist 99%. • At collimation system with crystal• Losses defined 2 sources: crystal and collimators.

• At optimal orientation, losses from crystal consist > 40% !• All losses definedby nuclear process: elastic and diffraction.•  ------------------------------------------------• E=7TeV, without crystal, gaps of primary collimator = 6 sigma.

Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia% I_global% 9.9533 0.4233 0.0000 0.28667 0.13000• At collimation system with crystal losses decreased in 50

times.

21 kkII colcryglob , 008.0,004.0 21 kk

Page 14: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

• Influence of amorphous layer• S_amor(um) Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • 0 99.1615 0.1510 0.2580 0.00225 98.71• 2 98.8984 0.1539 0.4671 0.003 98.41• 10 97.5932 0.1554 1.5750 0.00625 96.91• Losses at Sam=10um increase in ~3 times, and channeling

efficiency decrease on ~2%.• By orientation curve -> may only estimate collimation efficiency.

• Influence of torsion (skew) parameter• Torsion Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • 0 98.7845 0.2278 0.4208 0.00375 98.17• 0.02 95.1690 0.5708 2.9247 0.01475 92.34• Losses at torsion=0.02mrad/mm increase in 4 times, and

channeling efficiency decrease on 6%.• orientation (Angle= - 21 urad)

Page 15: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Influence of miscut parameter

miscut(mrad) Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich%• 0 99.1615 0.1510 0.2580 0.00225 98.71• 1 95.1298 2.0448 0.5186 0.02088 91.89• -1 99.1456 0.1510 0.2489 0.002 98.68

•Negative miscut angle practically don’t change efficiency of system,•Positive miscut angle = 1mrad in 9 times increase losses. !!!•That explained increasing proton density at edge of collimator•Channeling efficiency will decrease only on 7 % at badly situation of positive miscut,•At negative miscut channeling efficiency don’t change. !!!•We will use such orientation of crystal.

Page 16: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Influence of crystal thickness

• S(mm) Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • 1 99.1615 0.1510 0.2580 0.00225 98.71• 0.1 99.1525 0.1958 0.2446 0.00263 98.63

• For such big energy how in LHC may use very thin crystals 0.2-0.5 mm.

• Then more energy, then smaller scattering particles on crystal.

Page 17: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Influence of collimator’s offset (from gap of collimator TCSGb5)

• Gap(mm) Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • 2.0 99.1615 0.1510 0.2580 0.00225 98.71• 1.8 97.5829 1.9366 0.4025 0.01312 92.59

• Decreasing gap of collimator to 6.35 sigma -> in 6 times increase losses. !!!

• It defined by particles scattering and put with small impact parameter on the collimator.

Page 18: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Influence of PC gap size on the efficiency

• Gap_PC Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • 6.12 96.8994 0.1371 0.2114 0.00350 96.56• 6.3 98.0480 0.1340 0.2170 0.00263 97.8• 6.6 98.3978 0.1365 0.2176 0.00200 98.1• 7.2 98.7761 0.1346 0.2241 0.00200 98.41• 9.0 99.1615 0.1510 0.2580 0.00225 98.71

• When size of gap PC > 6.4 then losses don’t change and for stable work system size of gap stand at level 6.3 – 6.5 sigma.

• Such if crystal destroy the usual collimation system will work.

Page 19: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Using crystal with decreasing curvature

• Optimal orientation (Angle= - 22 urad)• C Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • 0 99.1615 0.1510 0.2580 0.00225 98.71• 1 99.4557 0.0035 0.2787 0.00075 97.7

• Losses decrease in 3 time, channeling efficiency decrease at 1%.

Page 20: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Source of losses only crystal !• Collimat. Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • carbon 99.4557 0.0035 0.2787 0.00075 97.7• absol. 99.6804 0.0015 0.2585 0.00090 97.7• carbon* 99.5100 0.0020 0.2679 0.00000 97.7

• All losses defined by protons go out from crystal !• That protons created in nuclear process; elastic and

diffraction.• Carbon* - case when processes nuclear elastic and

diffraction in crystal off, I_glob = 0 !!!• When will use added cold collimators losses = 0.

Page 21: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Influence of amorphous layer• S_amor(um) Iscr,% I1mm,% Icr% Ia_glob% Ich% • 0 99.4557 0.0035 0.2787 0.00075 97.7• 2 99.2055 0.0061 0.4844 0.00125 97.0• 10 97.8460 0.0151 1.6140 0.00487 95.7

• Losses at Sam=10um increase in ~5 times, and channeling efficiency decrease on ~2%.

• Amorphous layer must be <= 2um

Page 22: Investigation of using the crystalline target in channeling mode for beam collimation in the LHC

Conclusion and proposals:• Using crystals in channeling mode has

advantages for beam cleaning system LHC:1.Efficiency increase in ~100-50 times at

E = 450-7000GeV.2.All none ideality of crystal treatment (amorphous

layer <=2um, torsion <=0.01,miscut, twist) may increase losses in two time.

3.Using crystal with decreasing curvature increase collimation efficiency in 3 time.

4. In collimation system may use only two crystals in horizontal and vertical planes.